Abstract
Chronic wounds affect 12–15% of patients with diabetes and are associated with a drastic decrease in their quality of life. Here we demonstrate that purified mature naïve B220+/CD19+/IgM+/IgD+ B cells improve healing of acute and diabetic murine wounds after a single topical application. B cell treatment significantly accelerated acute wound closure by 2–3 days in wild-type mice and 5–6 days in obese diabetic mice. The treatment led to full closure in 43% of chronic diabetic wounds, as compared to only 5% in saline-treated controls. Applying equivalent numbers of T cells or disrupted B cells failed to reproduce these effects, indicating that live B cells mediated pro-healing responses. Topically-applied B cell treatment was associated with significantly reduced scar size, increased collagen deposition and maturation, enhanced angiogenesis and increased nerve growth into and under the healing wound. β-III tubulin+ nerve endings in scars of wounds treated acutely with B cells showed increased relative expression of growth-associated protein 43. The improved healing associated with B cell treatment was supported by significantly increased fibroblast proliferation and decreased apoptosis in the wound bed and edges, altered kinetics of neutrophil infiltration, as well as an increase in TGF-β and a significant reduction in MMP2 expression in wound granulation tissue. Our findings indicate that the timeline and efficacy of wound healing can be experimentally manipulated through the direct application of mature, naive B cells, which effectively modify the balance of mature immune cell populations within the wound microenvironment and accelerate the healing process.
INTRODUCTION
Effective and versatile technologies that facilitate acute and chronic wound healing remain a current unmet medical need. In the United States alone, chronic wounds affect an estimated 6.5 million patients, and numbers are expected to grow due to a sharp rise in the worldwide incidence of diabetes and obesity1. Cellular and tissue-based treatments that can simultaneously modulate inflammation in the wound microenvironment and promote regenerative responses have recently become a focus of wound care therapy development2. In healthy skin, wound healing is divided into four integrated and tightly regulated phases: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and tissue remodeling3. Immune cells infiltrate the wound in a specific and predictable order, with neutrophils and macrophages associated with the inflammation phase, and lymphocytes associated with the proliferation and remodeling phases4. Chronic wounds are thought to become locked in the inflammatory stage of wound healing5, with exaggerated proteolysis in the wound microenvironment mediating lesion stasis6. Moreover, the hypoxic conditions of the chronic wound bed degrade beneficial growth factors, preventing the progression towards the establishment of granulation tissue and extracellular matrix (ECM)3 and full healing.
The role of lymphocytes in wound healing, particularly that of B cells, has received little attention4. However, recent studies indicate that B cells can act as powerful modulators of tissue regeneration7. In addition to their potential to differentiate into antibody-producing plasma cells, B cells can efficiently present antigens to T cells and modulate local immune responses through secretion of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines8. Interestingly, purified B lymphocytes applied exogenously to a lesion were demonstrated to support recovery. B cells isolated from bone marrow and directly inserted into sites of ischemic cardiac injury in a rat model increased cardiac function and tissue repair, performing better than CD117+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)9. Studies that examined the impact of B cells in injury also describe beneficial effects on tissue healing. Splenectomized mice, in which the majority of mature B lymphocytes were removed, show delayed wound healing after skin lesions, while systemic reintroduction of isolated B cells rescued the wound healing phenotype10. An investigation using CD19-deficient animals suggested that hyaluronic acid within wounds may function as an endogenous ligand for toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) on the surface of B lymphocytes, triggering enhanced secretion of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, in a CD19-dependent manner11. These cytokines could in turn promote the production of growth factors within the tissue, aiding the healing process. In femoral fracture healing in mice, a system characterized by scarless regeneration, B cells massively infiltrated the callus region and actively promoted proliferative regeneration through secretion of osteoprotegerin12.
We hypothesized that the introduction of relatively large numbers of B cells (approximately 80,000 cells/mm3), which are typically present only in low numbers (approximately 100 cells/mm3) and are associated with late, proliferative stages of wound healing, could accelerate and support tissue repair. Here, we show for the first time, to our knowledge, that isolated mature naïve B cells can accelerate skin wound closure and improve the quality of the regenerated tissue when applied topically onto the wound bed at the time of injury or after wound chronicization in validated mouse models of diabetic and non-diabetic acute and chronic skin ulcers. B cell treatment was associated with reduced scarring and improved collagen deposition. Accelerated healing was supported by increased proliferation of wound fibroblasts in conjunction with decreased levels of apoptosis in the wound bed and edges and pro-regenerative modulation of cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Acceleration of wound healing was not observed following the application of disrupted B cells, viable T cells, or hematopoietic stem cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mouse models
Wound healing studies were conducted in 7–9 weeks-old male wild-type C57Bl6/J mice and 8–65 weeks-old male B6.BKS(D) – Leprdb/J mice (Jackson Laboratories). Male C57Bl6/J, B6.BKS(D) – Leprdb/J, and FVB-Tg(CAG-luc,-GFP) L2G85Chco/J (all from Jackson Laboratories) were used as isogeneic donors for B and T cell isolation. Animals were maintained under standard laboratory care conditions, at temperatures ranging between 20–23°C, under a 12h:12h light:dark cycle, with ad libitum access to food and acidified water.
Lymphocyte isolation
Mouse spleens were collected in ice cold EasySep™ buffer (STEMCELL Technologies) containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Spleens were dissociated mechanically through a 40 µm cell strainer and the splenocyte suspension was processed for negative B or T cell selection through immunomagnetic separation and retention of non-target cells, using commercially available cell isolation kits (STEMCELL Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. HSC isolation was performed through positive selection and immunomagnetic separation using CD117 MicroBeads, a MiniMACS™ separator, and an MS column (Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.).
Flow cytometry analysis
To assess cell viability after the isolation procedure, the cells were first washed and re-suspended in PBS, and stained using a Zombie UV™ fixable viability kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioLegend, Inc.). The stained cells were washed and re-suspended in PBS containing 1% FBS and 0.01% sodium azide (RICCA Chemical), blocked with FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec) at 10 µl/106 cells, then incubated with the following primary antibodies for 30 minutes at 4°C: FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgM (clone RMM-1), Brilliant Violet 605™-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgD (clone 11–26c.2a), Brilliant Violet 421™-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD19 (clone 6D5), APC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD45R/B220 (clone RA3–6B2), PE-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD22 (clone OX-97), PE/Cy7-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD23 (clone B3B4), Brilliant Violet 510™-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD24 (clone M1/69), APC/Cy7-conjugated rat anti-mouse TER-119/erythroid cells (clone TER-119), Brilliant Violet 711™-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD3 (clone 17A2), Brilliant Violet 785™-conjugated hamster anti-mouse CD11c (clone N418), PE/Dazzle™ 594-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD117/c-Kit (clone 2B8) (all from BioLegend, Inc.), BUV395-conjugated hamster anti-mouse CD69 (clone H1.2F3), APC-R700-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD138 (clone 281-2) (all from BD Biosciences). The cells were subsequently analyzed on an LSRFortessa X-20 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with 355nm, 405nm, 488nm, 561nm, and 640nm laser lines. For each sample, at least 50,000 events were collected for analysis. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software, version 10.2 (TreeStar, Inc.).
Wound model and quantitation of healing
Full-thickness excisional wounds through the dorsal skin were induced as described previously13. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with a cocktail of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg), and the dorsal skin was shaved and depilated. Analgesia was provided pre-operatively with 0.08 mg/kg buprenorphine injected subcutaneously. The dorsal skin was tented and a 5-mm biopsy punch was passed through the skin fold, creating two symmetrical wounds on each side of the back. Each wound had an initial area of approximately 20 mm2. Silicone splints with a square 14 mm by 14 mm outer profile and with an inner diameter of 7 mm were attached around the wounds using Vetbond tissue adhesive (3M). Cell suspensions in PBS or equal volumes of PBS solution alone (saline control) were applied directly onto the wound bed using a manual pipette. Each treated wound received 1.5×106 B cells or T cells (control) in 25 µl PBS. HSC controls received 12,000 purified HSCs per wound to replicate the maximum detected levels of CD117+ HSC contamination observed in negatively-selected B cell isolates (0.8%). The splinted wounds were then covered with Tegaderm™ transparent dressing (3M). High resolution photographs of the wounds (0.018 mm/pixel) were collected at regular intervals and the area of the open wound over time, as well as the area of the visible scar at the end point of each study were assessed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health). The splint area in each image was used to calibrate the measurements of the wound and to control for parallax error. Analysis of the wound areas was performed by experimenters blinded to the treatment conditions.
Histology
Wound biopsies at the end point of the wound healing time course were collected using a 10-mm biopsy punch and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 24–48 hours at 4°C, after which the samples were dehydrated through graded ethanol and xylene washes, and embedded in paraffin. Transverse sections through the wound bed were cut at a thickness of 5 µm, and mounted onto microscopy slides. Serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and with Masson’s trichrome stain for visualizing collagen fibers. Stained slides were digitized at a resolution of 0.25 µm/pixel using an Aperio CS2 scanner (Leica Biosystems). Digitized slides were used for scoring of tissue regeneration and neutrophil infiltration by observers blinded to the treatment conditions. For cellular infiltrate evaluation a minimum area of 3,500 µm2 was examined in each wound region (wound bed, wound edge, and distal).
Immunohistochemistry and confocal imaging
Wound biopsies collected at 0 days (intact), 1 day, 4 days, and 16 days post-injury were fixed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde for 24–48 hours at 4°C, then cryoprotected in 1M sucrose solution for another 24–48 hours at 4°C, and embedded in tissue freezing medium (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Transverse sections through the wound bed were cut at a thickness of 10 µm using a cryostat (Leica Biosystems), and thaw-mounted onto SuperFrost Plus Gold slides (Fisher Scientific). For immunohistochemical detection of antigens, sections were washed through three changes of Tris-buffered saline (TBS) pH 7.4, then permeabilized and blocked by incubation for 1 hour at room temperature with TBS containing 5% bovine serum albumin, 5% FBS, and 0.3% Triton X-100. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution: allophycocyanin-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD45R/B220 (clone RA3–6B2; BioLegend, Inc.), phycoerythrin-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD31 (clone MEC 13.3; BD Biosciences), Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated mouse anti-tubulin β3 (clone TUJ1; BioLegend, Inc.), Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated mouse anti-MMP2 (clone M6303D01; BioLegend, Inc.), Alexa Fluor® 647 rat anti-mouse IL-10 (clone JES5–16E3; BioLegend, Inc.], rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse FGF2 (LifeSpan BioSciences), rat anti-mouse fibroblasts (clone ER-TR7; LifeSpan BioSciences), rabbit polyclonal anti-GAP43 (EMD Millipore), rat monoclonal anti-substance P (EMD Millipore), rabbit polyclonal anti-MMP8 (Bioss Antibodies), chicken polyclonal anti-TGF-β1 (Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-Ki67 (Abcam), and rabbit monoclonal anti-activated caspase 3 (clone C92–605; BD Pharmigen). Unbound primary antibody was removed by 3 rinses for 5 min each in TBS. If unconjugated primary antibodies were used, antigenic sites were visualized by incubating the sections for 2 hours at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488®-conjugated F(ab’)2- goat anti-rabbit IgG, Alexa Fluor 546®-conjugated goat anti-chicken IgY, or Alexa Fluor 555®-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific), diluted 1:200 in blocking solution. Sections were counterstained by incubation with 2 µg/ml of 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindoledihydrochloride (DAPI; Sigma Aldrich) in PBS for 3 min at room temperature. The sections were washed 3 times for 7 min in TBS and embedded using Fluoromount (Novus Biologicals). Antibody controls included incubation of the tissue sections with isotype antibodies and omission of the primary antibody when a secondary antibody was used for visualization. No unspecific signal was detected in the control samples.
Stained tissue sections were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 710 laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with 20×, 40× and 63× objectives. Confocal images were taken at a resolution of 0.1–0.7 µm/pixel and an optical thickness of 0.5–2.2 µm using Zen software (Carl Zeiss).
Image analysis
Photographs of wounds as well as confocal microscopy images were analyzed using standard functions in ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health). In each photograph, the area of the open wound or the surface of the scar, respectively, as well as the area defined by the inner diameter of the silicone splint were measured manually. The known area of the splint was used to convert measurements from pixels to mm2. Confocal images were used to assess cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and neuroregeneration. Cells and cell nuclei were quantified in ImageJ either manually, using the ‘cell counter’ function, or semi-automatically, by subtracting background and converting the image to binary, followed by watershed-based image segmentation to isolate discrete particles, which were then quantified using the ‘analyze particles’ function. Cell counts for specific markers were normalized to total cell counts based on DAPI counterstaining. For quantifying continuous structures, tissue fields of view were outlined manually within each image, and threshold values for hue, saturation, and brightness were applied in order to select optimal intensity windows that unambiguously identified target structures. For quantifying intracellular expression, regions of interest were defined through intensity thresholding of DAPI counterstaining. The total area and mean labeling intensity of the target structures (blood vessels, nerve endings, or cells) was quantified using the ‘analyze particles’ or ‘measure’ functions, and normalized to the area of the analyzed region of interest. Images used for immunolabeling quantification were collected using identical confocal settings. All analyses were performed by observers blinded to the experimental conditions.
Micro-PET/CT imaging
Isolated splenic B cells were incubated for 3 hours at 37°C with protamine-conjugated 89Zr Feraheme nanoparticles14 at a concentration of 100 µg/ml iron. This incubation time was previously determined to be sufficient for labeling the majority of the B cells in suspension (data not shown). To remove unbound nanoparticle, the cells were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 500×g and re-suspended in fresh PBS three times, after which the cells were finally re-suspended in PBS at a concentration of 100,000 cells/µl. Approximately 2 million B cells in 20 µl of PBS, comprising 20 µCi of total radioactivity were applied the wound on the right dorsal side of the animal as described above, while the contralateral wound received an equal volume of PBS. The mice were imaged at regular intervals using an eXplore Vista micro-PET-CT imaging system (GE Healthcare). At the end point of the studies, the animals were euthanized and tissue samples from the treated wound site, the control wound, lymph nodes on each side of the body, the spleen, liver and muscle were collected for measuring residual radioactivity using a 2480 WIZARD2 gamma counter (Perkin Elmer).
IVIS imaging
Splenic B cells were isolated from mice homozygous for the CAG-luc-eGFP L2G85 transgene, which show widespread expression of firefly luciferase and enhanced green fluorescence protein under the CAG promoter (Jackson Laboratories). Approximately 2.2 million luciferase-expressing B cells in PBS were applied to the wound on one side, as described above, while the contralateral wound received an equal volume of PBS. The mice were imaged using an IVIS Lumina II system (Caliper Life Sciences) on the day of the surgery and at regular intervals thereafter for a total of 4 weeks. For each imaging session, anesthesia was induced using 3% isoflurane in oxygen and maintained using 1 L/min of 2–3% isoflurane throughout the imaging session. To visualize luciferase activity, 50 µl of 30 mg/ml aqueous d-luciferin solution (Regis Technologies, Inc.) was injected subcutaneously proximal to the injury site at least 5 minutes before imaging. At the end of the studies, the animals were euthanized and tissue biopsies from the treated wound and the contralateral (control) wound were collected, and processed for immunohistochemistry, as described above.
Statistical analysis
The statistical significance of differences between experimental groups and/or measures was assessed using one-way, two-way, or two-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by post-hoc multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni or Tukey method. Two-way ANOVA with one within-subjects factor (cell type) and one between-subjects factor (genotype; n = 3 animals each, values were averages across three technical replicates) were used for flow cytometry data. Two-way ANOVA with treatment type or dosage as a between-subjects factor (n = 5–30 animals per condition, pooled within genotype across experimental replicates as available) and time point as a within-subjects factor were used for the analysis of timed in vivo wound healing studies. Histological evaluations of scar quality were analyzed using either one-way ANOVA with treatment as the main factor, or two-way ANOVA with treatment as a between-subjects factor and scoring criterion as within-subjects factor. Immunohistochemistry data (n = 3–11 images from independent tissue sections collected from 3–5 animals per condition) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with one between-subjects factor (treatment) and one within-subjects factor (time point, region, or marker), two-way ANOVA with two between-subjects factors (treatment-region combination and time point), or Holm-Sidak method with alpha = 0.05 and without assuming a consistent SD. All reported descriptive statistics are estimated marginal means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). All statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).
Study approval
All animal procedures were performed following the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Massachusetts General Hospital. All efforts were made to reduce the number of animals used and to minimize animal suffering.
RESULTS
Characterization of B cells isolated from the spleen of wild-type (WT) and diabetic (db/db) animals
After negative immunomagnetic selection, the majority of the isolated cells (85–92%) were CD45R/B220+/CD19+ B cells. Erythrocytes represented the major contaminant in all samples, constituting 10–25% of isolated cells. Other cell types represented minor contaminants, comprising less than 1% of the cell isolate. Results indicated very similar profiles between the isolates from WT and db/db mice (F(6, 24) = 0.793, p = 0.584; Fig. S1, Table S1). Further characterization showed that the majority (96.4 ± 0.73%) of the B cells in the isolate were mature naïve IgM+/IgD+ B cells. The composition and the relative proportions of B cell subpopulations did not differ significantly between genotypes (F(1,4) = 1.25, p = 0.326; Fig. S1, Table S2).
A single topical application of enriched mature naïve B cells significantly accelerates wound closure after acute injury in WT and db/db animals
To determine the optimal dosage of B cells for application onto wounds, a dose response study was performed in WT mice using 0.1×106, 0.5×106, 1.5×106, 5×106, or 10×106 B cells per 20 mm2 wound (Fig. S2). An application of 1.5 × 106 B cells was selected as the lowest dosage that showed a significant acceleration of wound closure (F(72, 400) = 2.92, p < 0.0001). To examine the effect of B cell treatment on acute wounds, 1.5×106 negatively-selected B cells, T cells, or only saline were applied onto splinted full-thickness excision lesions immediately after injury. Purified HSCs at a dosage equivalent to the maximum estimated numbers of HSC contamination in negatively selected B cell isolates (0.8%) were included as an additional control in diabetic animals. In WT animals, B-cell-treated wounds closed 2–3 days earlier than either saline or T-cell-treated controls, showing significantly reduced open wound areas after day 2 post-injury (F(16, 360) = 4.747, p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed between the saline control and the T cell treatment (Fig. 1A–B). All wounds eventually closed fully within the observed time interval, with the visible scar size being significantly smaller in B cell-treated wounds (Fig. 2F). In diabetic animals, the regenerative effect of B cells was more pronounced, with B-cell-treated wounds closing 5–6 days earlier than either saline-treated, HSC-treated or T-cell-treated controls, and showing significantly reduced areas after day 6 post-injury (F(52, 780) = 9.184, p < 0.0001). B cells isolated from healthy or diabetic animals performed equally well (Fig. 1C). Notably, approximately 64% of the 50 wounds treated with saline, HSCs, or T cells progressed towards a chronic ulcer phenotype, remaining >50% open up to day 34 post-injury, with only 0.5% of the ulcers fully closed. By contrast, only 7.9% of the 38 B-cell-treated wounds remained >40% open by this time point, with 50% percent of the wounds fully closed (Fig. 1C–D).
We hypothesized that the pro-regenerative effects of B cell application are cell-mediated, and not simply based on the immediate action of molecular factors contained within the cells. To test this hypothesis, wounds were treated either with whole B cells in suspension, or with an equivalent number of B cells that were first disrupted through sonication. Live B cell treatment accelerated wound closure by approximately 3 days (F(16, 136) = 3.446, p < 0.0001), performing significantly better than either equivalent numbers of lysed B cells, or saline control (Fig. 1E–F).
B cell treatment improves the quality of tissue repair
At the end of the wound healing time course, the wounded areas were excised and evaluated histologically for indicators of tissue regeneration, including overall width and thickness of the scar tissue, collagen deposition and maturation, angiogenesis, and nerve growth (see Table S3 for parameters and scoring system). In WT animals, acute B cell treatment was associated with better tissue regeneration and a smaller scar surface (Fig. 2). B-cell-treated wounds scored significantly better than wounds treated with saline or T cells (F(2, 55) = 18.34, p < 0.0001). This benefit was largely due to improved patterning of collagen deposition, with fibers distributed in a reticulated pattern resembling the structure found in intact skin, enhanced angiogenesis, and significantly reduced scar width (F(14, 385) = 2.238, p < 0.01; Fig. 2E). The latter measure corroborated data from area measurements of the visible scar at day 16 post injury, indicating a significantly smaller area of the scars in wounds that had been treated with B cells (F(2, 45) = 21.37, p < 0.0001; Fig. 2F).
In db/db mice, treatment with B cells derived from the spleen of either WT or diabetic syngeneic animals led to reduced scar area and more compact scar tissue, with less vacuolization and inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig. 3). Wounds treated with either WT or db/db B cells scored significantly better than wounds treated with saline or T cells (F(3, 62) = 12.42, p < 0.0001). This improvement was supported by the deposition and maturation of collagen fibers, enhanced angiogenesis and neuroregeneration, defined as the growth of new nerve endings under and into the scar tissue, and significantly reduced scar width (F(21, 434) = 4.353, p < 0.0001; Fig. 3F). As in WT animals, collagen fibers were deposited in a reticulated pattern in the scars of wounds treated with B cells as compared to large parallel bundles observed in controls, particularly after treatment with WT B cells (Fig. 3C’-D’). Area measurements of the visible scar or open wound at day 34 post injury showed significantly lower values in wounds that had been treated with WT or db/db B cells (F(3, 91) = 10.32, p < 0.0001; Fig. 3G).
B cell treatment reactivates proliferative healing in chronic diabetic skin ulcers
To assess whether B cell application can re-initiate healing in a chronic ulcer, wounds were generated on the dorsal skin in obese diabetic mice and treated with saline dressing only. After 10 days all wounds were still open, and most showed rounded, non-proliferative edges typical of chronic ulcers15. At this time-point, the wounds were treated with WT-derived B cells or saline. A rapid reduction of over 50% in the area of the open wound was observed 4 days after B cell application (Fig. 4), and the treated wounds maintained a significant advantage in the closure rate up to 30 days (F(6, 174) = 15.97, p < 0.0001). Over the course of the study, 43% of the wounds treated with B cells closed fully, as compared to only 5% of the saline treated wounds. At 30 days post injury, wounds with at least 50% of the initial surface still open were subjected to a second application of either B cells or saline control (Fig. 4C). B cell treatment again showed a positive effect as compared to saline (F(1, 13) = 6.435, p < 0.05), with a 10% reduction in the open area of the treated wounds. This effect was most pronounced at 4 days post B cell application and was maintained at 8 days (F(2, 26) = 3.889, p < 0.05). B cell application enhanced cell proliferation and migration in the edges of the treated wounds, as indicated by the change in the wound edge morphology from rounded to flat, forming an epithelial tongue which extended towards the wound bed (Fig. 4B, D).
B cells derived from aged db/db mice can accelerate wound healing in aged diabetic animals
To assess the efficacy of B cells that were subjected to prolonged exposure to a diabetic hyperglycemic environment, cells were isolated from aged (15-months-old) obese db/db mice and applied onto acute wounds in 6–15-month-old obese db/db mice. Results indicated that the B cell treatment prevented the initial inflammatory enlargement of the wounds often observed in saline-treated controls, and furthermore led to a significant acceleration of wound closure (F(7, 84) = 21.45, p < 0.0001) and reduced scar size in all animals examined (n = 7; Fig. 4G–H).
Exogenous B cells localize to the wound bed and remain viable up to 2 weeks after application
To examine whether exogenously applied B cells are retained within or migrate away from the site of application, B cells were labeled with 89Zr-protamine-conjugated Feraheme nanoparticles before application onto wound beds. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) scanning of the whole body, showed that the signal remained well-localized within the wound bed up to 13 days (Fig. 5). Some loss of signal at the wound site may occur due to cell death and subsequent diffusion of released nanoparticles. Indeed, when free nanoparticles were applied to the wound bed in the absence of B cells, diffusion of the signal occurred rapidly, leading to an apparent loss of signal intensity at the injury site and increased activity in other organs, including lymph nodes and spleen, by day 14 post application (Fig. 5A–C).
To examine in situ survival of the introduced cells, luciferase-expressing B cells were applied onto the wound bed and the mice were imaged over 24 days. Light emission indicating active enzymatic activity within the applied cells strongly declined after day 6, and reached undetectable levels by day 14 (Fig. 5D–E). These results indicate that the exogenous B cells have a limited life span of up to 2 weeks in situ within the wound bed.
Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue sections collected from the wound site confirmed that the number of B220+ B cells in the wound bed and edges was significantly elevated after exogenous application (F(1, 58) = 37.31, p < 0.0001). The introduced B cells became well integrated into the newly-formed granulation tissue (Fig. S3A–B). B220+ cells were detected in significantly higher numbers in B-cell-treated wounds as compared to saline-treated controls at 1 and 4 days post application (F(3, 58) = 7.987, p < 0.001), but this difference was no longer statistically significant at 17 days (p = 0.353; Fig. S3C).
B cell application is associated with increased fibroblast proliferation, reduced apoptosis in the wound bed and edges and a pro-regenerative wound molecular microenvironment
To examine the mechanism for the accelerated wound healing observed following B cell application, treated and control biopsies collected at 24 hours and 4 days after injury and treatment, were labeled against cleaved caspase-3 and Ki67, as markers of apoptosis or cell proliferation, respectively. Counts were normalized to the overall cell density based on DAPI counterstaining. Results showed a significant decrease in the relative numbers of apoptotic cells in wounds treated with B cells at the time of injury (F(1, 48) = 15.67, p < 0.001; Fig. 6A–C, G). At the same time points, cell proliferation was significantly increased in B-cell-treated tissues as compared to saline controls (F(1, 48) = 23.59, p < 0.0001; Fig. 6D–F, H).
When distinct regions of the wound were analyzed independently 4 days after injury and treatment, high numbers of B cells were associated with increased cell proliferation and reduced apoptosis, in particular in the wound bed and edges (Fig. 7B). In agreement with results indicating limited persistence of exogenous cells at the wound site, proliferating Ki67+B220+ B cells were never observed in situ (Fig. 7A, C). Virtually all mitotic cells were fibroblasts, identified by immunolabeling with a monoclonal antibody raised against mouse fibroblasts, and they were localized proximally to the B cells (Fig. 7A, D). These results indicate that the B cell-mediated acceleration of wound healing is associated with a skewing of the apoptosis-cell proliferation balance in the wound bed and edges, leading to a net addition of cells.
B cell treatment was associated with multiple changes in the molecular microenvironment of the wound bed. At 4 days after injury, a significant increase in TGF-β was observed in cells of the granulation tissue in B cell-treated wounds (F(2, 26) = 7.783, p < 0.01; Fig. S4A–B). No significant changes in expression were observed for other growth factors such as FGF2, or in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 at this time point (Fig. S4E). Conversely, a significant decrease in the expression of MMP2, a major proteolytic enzyme, within and around the cells in the wound bed was observed in B cell-treated wounds as compared to saline controls (F(1, 18) = 45.97, p < 0.001; Fig. S4C–D). No significant change was observed in the expression of MMP8 between B cell treated and control wounds (Fig. S4F). These results further support the view that the application of B cells induces discrete changes in the wound microenvironment that accelerate wound closure.
B cell application accelerates the dynamics of neutrophil infiltration into the wound
To examine the dynamics of inflammatory cell infiltration at the wound site, as related to B cell application, tissue sections from wound biopsies collected at 24 hours, 4 days, 10 days, and 16 days after injury were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and the numbers of neutrophils were analyzed in the wound bed, wound edge and the periphery of the wound biopsy (Fig. S5). Baseline numbers of neutrophils in the intact skin as well as distally to the wound were very low at 1.1×106 and 1.6×106 cells/µm3 (Fig. S5A). In wounds treated with B cells, significantly increased numbers of neutrophils were observed in the wound bed at early time points, particularly at 24 hours when they reached 45 (± 1.1)×106 cells/µm3 as compared to 29 (± 2.8)×106 cells/µm3 (p < 0.0001) in saline-treated controls and, somewhat less pronounced, at 4 days after the injury, decreasing rapidly at later time points. By contrast, saline-treated controls showed less acute neutrophil infiltration early after injury, but the rate of reduction in neutrophil numbers over time was 2.5 times slower than in B cell-treated wounds, as indicated by the linear regression slope (Fig. S5B). By 10 days post injury, the difference in neutrophil numbers reversed, with saline-treated wounds having on average 19 (± 1.8)×106 cells/µm3 while B cells treated wounds showed only 11 (± 3)×106 cells/µm3. Moreover, in the wound edge, the peak of neutrophil infiltration was observed at 1 day in B cell treated wounds with 19 (± 2.6)×106 cells/µm3, but at 10 days in saline-treated controls with 11.5 (± 1.9)×106 cells/µm3. These results suggest an overall acceleration of the acute response to injury in animals treated with B cells.
B cell treatment enhances regeneration of vasculature and nerve fibers in the scar tissue
To investigate whether B cell application alters the trophic environment of the wound and affects long-term regenerative phenomena, including angiogenesis and neuroregeneration, tissue sections collected from healed scar tissue that had been treated with either B cells or saline were labeled with anti-CD31 and anti-β-III tubulin antibodies to visualize endothelial cells and neurites, respectively (Fig. 8). Quantification of the area covered by immunolabeling with either of these markers showed that the acute B cell application was associated with significant increases in the extent of angiogenesis and neuroregeneration within the scar tissue at day 16 post-injury, as compared to saline-treated controls (F(1, 17) = 20.66, p < 0.001; Fig. 8C). These results confirm a broad-impact pro-regenerative effect of exogenous B cells, which appears to lead to a shift in the trophic properties of the wound microenvironment, even at long intervals after injury.
Moreover, nerve endings that grew under and within the scar tissue of wounds that were treated with B cells at the time of injury showed significantly increased expression of growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43), an established marker of axonal regeneration16 (Fig. S6). Regenerating nerve endings were not immunopositive for the neuropeptide substance P, and thus were not peptidergic C fibers17, suggesting that the enhanced neurite growth was likely not associated with detrimental increases in nociceptive sensitivity in the scar tissue (Fig. S6).
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrates for the first time, to our knowledge, that the progression of wound healing in the skin can be positively manipulated by altering the balance of a mature immune cell population, specifically B cells, within the wound microenvironment. While the roles of neutrophils and macrophages in wound healing are well-documented, little is known regarding B cells in this context. Some studies report that no B cells can be found at the site of a lesion18, while others describe only very low cell numbers infiltrating the wound bed10. In the present study, B cells were detected at above-baseline levels at 4 days after injury in saline-treated control wounds, and persisted at that level up to 17 days post injury in WT mice. These results are in agreement with other reports demonstrating the presence of B cells in the wound bed at 3 and 7 days after a skin lesion11, and indicate that B cells do normally infiltrate the wound tissue, albeit in low numbers. Direct application of exogenous B cells shifted the proportion of this lymphocyte population present in the wound bed, and the time after the injury when they become locally abundant.
While no previous study has examined the impact of direct B cell transfer into the wound environment, several studies indicate that circulating B cells play an active role in wound healing10. It has been hypothesized that B cell production of IgG1 immunoglobulins aids in the opsonization of dead cells at the injury site, facilitating their clearance by macrophages10. Mice deficient in the B cell-specific marker CD19 show impaired wound healing, while overexpression of CD19 on B cells accelerates wound closure11. Interestingly, ECM components can induce CD19-dependent TLR signaling in the B cells localized in the wound, which in turn induces the expression of key cytokines such as IL-6, IL-10, and TGF-β11. These factors can directly reduce inflammation and promote the proliferation of fibroblasts and keratinocytes, for example through the TGF-β pathway19, but they can also act indirectly, by regulating skin expression of cytokines and growth factors. Indeed, in the present study, the application of B cells onto acute wounds led to an initial increase in the numbers of neutrophils infiltrating into the wound bed, followed by a rapid decrease. The rate of neutrophil depletion in the granulation tissue of the wound bed was 2.5-fold faster than in saline-treated controls, supporting the hypothesis of an overall acceleration in the timeline of wound healing stages. Interestingly, in CD19−/− knockout mice, both reduced neutrophil infiltration as well as delayed wound healing have been reported11.
An investigation that used direct exogenous application of isolated B lymphocytes at the site of cardiac ischemia showed that intramyocardial injection of B cells into injured myocardium preserved cardiac function by preventing cardiomyocyte apoptosis and stimulating local cell proliferation 9. These results are consistent with the findings of the present study, where B cell application to the wound bed at the time of the lesion was associated with significantly reduced apoptosis and enhanced fibroblast proliferation at 1 and 4 days after injury and treatment. This effect of B cells may be mediated via β-catenin, an important regulator of fibroblast behavior during the proliferative phase of dermal wound repair19.
The results of the present study point to a complex multi-modal modulatory effect of exogenously added B cells in the context of wound healing. In granulation tissue at 4 days post injury, B cell treatment was associated with an increase in the expression of major activating growth factors such as TGF-β, which at this stage is observed predominantly in fibroblasts and wound macrophages. At the same time, the expression of MMP2, a protease whose up-regulation is an indicator of chronic wounds20, was reduced in B cell treated wounds as compared to saline controls. Together, these observations support the notion that the presence of B cells can reduce the proteolytic characteristics of the wound microenvironment, preventing tissue degradation, and at the same time can promote a shift towards a more trophic milieu that can enhance fibroblast proliferation in the granulation tissue.
Application of B cells at the time of injury in the present study was associated with a significant increase in the number of capillaries and nerve endings within the area of the scar over two weeks later. During wound healing, angiogenic capillary sprouts invade the fibrin/fibronectin-rich wound clot and organize into a microvascular network throughout the granulation tissue21. Neutrophils infiltrating at early stages of wound healing have been previously shown to promote angiogenesis22, making the significantly increased neutrophil infiltration at the wound site observed at early time points in B cell-treated wounds a potential indirect mechanism for increased vascularization. Moreover, while B cells are known to secrete some proangiogenic factors upon stimulation, such as TGF-β11, they likely support angiogenesis indirectly, by inducing the secretion of cytokines and growth factors in neighboring fibroblasts and keratinocytes, as observed in the wound bed. Similarly, B cell therapy creates a permissive microenvironment for nerve fiber regrowth. Histological analysis showed that in WT mice, approximately 64% of the wounds (9/14) treated acutely with B cells showed pronounced innervation and cutaneous nerve growth under the scar tissue at 16 days post injury, as compared to only 20% of the wounds (6/30) treated with saline. Interestingly, the converse effect is well documented, as denervation of a skin domain slows the rate of wound healing in that area by reducing the inflammatory infiltrate, including T and B lymphocytes23. These results point to a significant reciprocal neuroimmune crosstalk in the wound microenvironment as observed in lymphoid organs 24, which could be used as a mechanism for regulating neuroregeneration in the context of injury 25. Such an effect will be especially relevant for the treatment of diabetic wounds and ulcers, where main obstacles to healing include vasculopathy and neuropathy1, 26. Importantly, B cells isolated from aged diabetic mice, and applied onto wounds in aged db/db mice, all of which showed pronounced hyperglycemia, still showed unaltered capacity for promoting wound healing, providing a promising option for the development of autologous immunotherapies for patients with diabetes.
In summary, we demonstrate that the topical application of mature, minimally-manipulated B lymphocytes can alter the progression of acute and chronic wounds in a spatio-temporally localized manner. Taken together, these data support the view that the experimental manipulation of the numbers and the timing of B cells arriving at the wound site affects multiple aspects of the inflammatory and proliferative stages of wound healing, modulating and abbreviating the inflammatory phase and inducing a pro-regenerative molecular milieu in the wound bed. These results support the further development of a novel and promising autologous B cell-based immunotherapy that may be applicable to the treatment of difficult to treat acute and chronic wounds including most notably, diabetic foot ulcers.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Paul Papagni, J.D. and Dr. Alexander Justicz, MD from Holy Cross Hospital for guidance and helpful suggestions on the studies. The authors would like to thank Drs. Patrick M. Reeves, Ph.D. and Shaw H. Warren, MD for helpful suggestions and comments on the manuscript, and Drs. Khalid Shah, Ph.D. and Jasneet K. Khalsa, Ph.D. for the generous gift of fLuc-eGFP B cells. This research was supported by the Specialized Histopathology Services Core Facility of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (P30 CA06516). Background Intellectual Property required for performing the research plan was provided by Innovations at Massachusetts General Hospital and Holy Cross Hospital.
Sources of Funding: Funding for these studies was provided through the Trinity Innovation Fund by Holy Cross Hospital, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, the VIC Innovation Fund, and NIH grant 5R01EB017699-03 to CK. Dr. Orgill receives research support from the Gillian Reny Stepping Strong Fund.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
- Ig
immunoglobulin
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- CD
cluster of differentiation
- TLR-4
toll-like receptor 4
- TGF-β
transforming growth factor beta
- IL
interleukin
- HSCs
hematopoietic stem cells
- WT
wild-type
- ANOVA
analysis of variance
- Zr
zirconium
- PET/CT
positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography
- MIP
maximum intensity projection
- CPM
counts per minute
- DAPI
4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
- GAP43
growth-associated protein 43
- FBS
fetal bovine serum
- EDTA
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
- TBS
Tris-buffered saline
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: No competing financial interests exist.
References
- 1.Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17(6):763–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Garwood CS, Steinberg JS. What’s new in wound treatment: a critical appraisal. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(Suppl 1):268–74. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Trøstrup H, Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Høiby N, Moser C. What Is New in the Understanding of Non Healing Wounds Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Therapies. Ulcers. 2013;2013:8. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Park JE, Barbul A. Understanding the role of immune regulation in wound healing. Am J Surg. 2004;187(5A):11S–6S. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00296-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg. 1998;176(2A Suppl):26S–38S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00183-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Trengove NJ, Stacey MC, MacAuley S, Bennett N, Gibson J, Burslem F, et al. Analysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors. Wound Repair Regen. 1999;7(6):442–52. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00442.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hoffman W, Lakkis FG, Chalasani G. B Cells, Antibodies, and More. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(1):137–54. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09430915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li R, Rezk A, Healy LM, Muirhead G, Prat A, Gommerman JL, et al. Cytokine-Defined B Cell Responses as Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2015;6:626. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goodchild TT, Robinson KA, Pang W, Tondato F, Cui J, Arrington J, et al. Bone marrow-derived B cells preserve ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(10):1005–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nishio N, Ito S, Suzuki H, Isobe K. Antibodies to wounded tissue enhance cutaneous wound healing. Immunology. 2009;128(3):369–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03119.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Iwata Y, Yoshizaki A, Komura K, Shimizu K, Ogawa F, Hara T, et al. CD19, a response regulator of B lymphocytes, regulates wound healing through hyaluronan-induced TLR4 signaling. Am J Pathol. 2009;175(2):649–60. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Könnecke I, Serra A, El Khassawna T, Schlundt C, Schell H, Hauser A, et al. T and B cells participate in bone repair by infiltrating the fracture callus in a two-wave fashion. Bone. 2014;64:155–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang X, Ge J, Tredget EE, Wu Y. The mouse excisional wound splinting model, including applications for stem cell transplantation. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(2):302–9. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yuan H, Wilks MQ, El Fakhri G, Normandin MD, Kaittanis C, Josephson L. Heat-induced-radiolabeling and click chemistry: A powerful combination for generating multifunctional nanomaterials. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1219–22. doi: 10.1172/JCI32169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grasselli G, Strata P. Structural plasticity of climbing fibers and the growth-associated protein GAP-43. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:25. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Steinhoff MS, von Mentzer B, Geppetti P, Pothoulakis C, Bunnett NW. Tachykinins and their receptors: contributions to physiological control and the mechanisms of disease. Physiol Rev. 2014;94(1):265–301. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Martin CW, Muir IF. The role of lymphocytes in wound healing. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43(6):655–62. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(90)90185-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bielefeld KA, Amini-Nik S, Alman BA. Cutaneous wound healing: recruiting developmental pathways for regeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(12):2059–81. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1152-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Martins VL, Caley M, O’Toole EA. Matrix metalloproteinases and epidermal wound repair. Cell Tissue Res. 2013;351:255–68. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1410-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tonnesen MG, Feng X, Clark RA. Angiogenesis in wound healing. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2000;5(1):40–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1087-0024.2000.00014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang Y, Li L, Liu Y, Liu ZR. PKM2 released by neutrophils at wound site facilitates early wound healing by promoting angiogenesis. Wound Repair Regen. 2016;24(2):328–36. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Richards AM, Floyd DC, Terenghi G, McGrouther DA. Cellular changes in denervated tissue during wound healing in a rat model. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(6):1093–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02908.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jung WC, Levesque JP, Ruitenberg MJ. It takes nerve to fight back: The significance of neural innervation of the bone marrow and spleen for immune function. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Klebe D, McBride D, Flores JJ, Zhang JH, Tang J. Modulating the Immune Response Towards a Neuroregenerative Peri-injury Milieu After Cerebral Hemorrhage. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2015;10(4):576–86. doi: 10.1007/s11481-015-9613-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Uccioli L, Izzo V, Meloni M, Vainieri E, Ruotolo V, Giurato L. Non-healing foot ulcers in diabetic patients: general and local interfering conditions and management options with advanced wound dressings. J Wound Care. 2015;24(4 Suppl):35–42. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.Sup4b.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.