Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2017 Dec 19;16:1062–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.12.029

Data set of enzyme fingerprinting of dietary fibre components (arabinoxylan and β-glucan) in old and modern Italian durum wheat genotypes

Michele A De Santis a, Ondrej Kosik b, Diana Passmore b, Zina Flagella a, Peter R Shewry b,, Alison Lovegrove b
PMCID: PMC5760467  PMID: 29326969

Abstract

The data presented are related to the research article entitled “Comparison of the dietary fibre composition of old and modern durum wheat (Triticum turgidum spp. durum) genotypes” (De Santis et al., 2018) [1]. This article provides details of the structures of the major dietary fibre components, arabinoxylan and β-glucan, in semolina and wholemeal flour of old and modern Italian durum wheat genotypes grown in two seasons, determined by enzyme digestion followed by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (enzyme fingerprinting).


Specifications Table

Subject area Agriculture and Biological sciences
More specific subject area Genetic differences and Food Quality
Type of data Tables
How data was acquired Laboratory analysis by High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography (HP-AEC)
Data format Raw, analyzed
Experimental factors The structures of dietary fibre components were determined in wholemeal and semolina from old and recent Italian durum wheat genotypes grown in two field trials
Experimental features Allowed the identification of relationships between fibre structure and the release dates of the genotypes
Data source location Foggia (Italy, 41° 28′ N, 15° 32′E and 75 m a.s.l.), collected in June 2013 and June 2014
Data accessibility Data are available in this article

Value of the data

  • Details of the structures of arabinoxylan and β-glucan determined by the proportions of arabinoxylan oligo-saccharides (AXOS) and glucooligosaccharides (GOS) released by digestion with xylanase 11 and lichenase, respectively

  • Allows comparison of old and recent types of durum wheat: 8 modern cultivars, 3 old cultivars bred before 1949 and 4 old landraces

  • Includes comparison of wholemeal and white flour (semolina) fractions

1. Data

The datasets provide details of the structure of dietary fibre in grains of old and modern Italian durum wheat (Triticum turgidum spp. durum) genotypes, grown in two different crop seasons [1]. Table 1 presents the grain quality traits of the genotypes grown in two seasons while Table 2, Table 3 give details of the structures of arabinoxylan and β-glucan determined by enzymatic fingerprinting of semolina and wholemeal flours. Correlations between grain quality parameters and dietary fibre content and composition are reported in Table 4.

Table 1.

Grain quality traits of old and modern durum wheat genotypes grown in two crop seasons.

Genotype Year of release 1000 kernel weight (g) Test weight (kg hl-1) Grain protein content (% dm) Semolina protein content (% dm) Ash content (% dm)
2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014

old
Dauno III 1900 47.8 45.8 77.4 78.3 15.9 14.3 14.0 13.1 0.77 0.80
old Saragolla 1900 49.2 49.1 80.7 76.7 15.4 16.4 13.6 15.3 0.80 0.76
Russello 1910 48.6 54.9 78.7 79.1 16.5 13.6 14.5 12.3 0.85 0.88
Timilia R.B. 1910 35.8 34.5 80.6 79.2 16.4 13.9 14.8 12.8 0.70 0.88
Cappelli 1915 54.4 48.6 81.3 79.2 16.8 14.5 15.3 13.5 0.82 0.80
Garigliano 1927 56.0 64.1 78.9 76.1 15.4 14.9 13.8 14.3 0.83 0.80
Grifoni 235 1949 53.4 54.9 80.4 75.6 15.6 13.1 12.0 11.1 0.79 0.86
modern
Adamello 1985 55.6 37.8 79.6 67.5 14.0 16.0 12.5 14.8 0.83 0.87
Simeto 1988 47.7 38.3 79.8 69.6 15.4 13.4 14.0 12.1 0.60 0.82
Preco 1995 57.2 31.7 81.6 66.7 13.0 15.9 11.6 14.6 0.87 0.96
Iride 1996 54.1 36.0 82.2 80.5 13.0 11.5 11.3 10.8 0.60 0.86
Svevo 1996 45.8 33.6 82.2 73.6 16.1 15.0 14.8 13.8 0.82 0.73
Claudio 1998 50.8 41.6 84.5 81.8 12.4 11.7 10.6 10.8 0.83 0.60
Saragolla 2004 38.0 43.8 83.0 79.9 12.7 12.0 11.2 11.2 0.74 0.85
PR22D89 2005 57.0 41.4 83.8 74.7 12.6 12.9 10.7 12.2 0.80 0.87
LSD 0.64 0.09 0.04 0.07 0.005

Least significant difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05.

Table 2.

Structures of dietary fibre components in semolina from old and modern Italian durum wheat genotypes, grown in two crop seasons, determined as percentages of AXOS and GOS from enzyme fingerprinting.

Genotypes x x2 x3 x5 xa3xx xa3a3xx xa3xa3xx xa2+3xx xa3a2+3xx xa3xa2+3xx G3:G4 β-glucan peak area
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (ratio) (nC)
2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014

Old
Dauno III 17.5 17.5 18.0 16.0 8.2 8.7 12.6 11.0 13.9 15.0 6.1 6.1 2.4 2.6 14.8 15.9 4.0 4.5 2.5 2.6 2.05 2.57 14,776 12,227
old Saragolla 19.7 22.3 19.8 17.2 8.3 6.9 5.6 4.0 13.6 15.6 6.0 5.5 2.6 2.9 17.2 17.5 4.2 4.9 2.9 3.2 2.25 3.08 14,041 10,262
Russello 19.5 19.3 19.0 15.6 5.5 5.3 11.3 9.9 14.2 16.4 8.0 8.0 2.3 2.6 14.0 15.7 3.7 4.3 2.6 2.8 2.40 2.74 13,027 15,141
Timilia R.B. 19.7 18.7 14.2 12.7 6.8 7.1 9.5 7.5 15.9 17.1 9.1 9.1 2.8 3.1 15.7 17.0 3.8 4.6 2.6 3.0 2.39 2.97 13,011 18,224
Cappelli 18.9 19.9 13.2 16.1 7.6 5.3 13.0 10.1 15.5 14.8 6.7 6.4 2.4 2.4 16.1 17.4 3.9 4.8 2.7 3.0 2.04 2.26 14,414 10,824
Garigliano 20.5 17.8 15.9 15.3 4.4 6.7 10.9 10.1 13.5 15.4 6.7 6.5 2.0 2.5 18.4 18.1 4.6 4.7 3.1 2.9 2.40 2.62 8,272 14,117
Grifoni 235 19.0 18.7 11.5 13.3 4.2 4.4 14.1 10.7 11.9 13.2 6.0 6.0 2.5 2.7 22.1 21.5 5.8 5.9 3.3 3.4 1. 82 2.86 17,720 15,641
modern
Adamello 19.3 20.7 12.9 16.1 6.3 7.3 15.6 10.9 13.8 13.9 5.0 4.1 2.0 2.0 17.1 16.6 4.8 4.9 3.3 3.4 2.30 3.85 16,137 9,224
Simeto 21.4 19.1 15.4 12.2 6.3 5.9 6.7 13.1 15.5 14.7 5.5 5.2 2.2 2.5 18.3 18.9 5.1 5.1 3.5 3.3 2.12 2.79 12,152 10,389
Preco 17.9 20.4 15.6 16.8 10.2 7.8 13.3 9.3 11.6 13.6 6.7 5.1 2.3 2.0 15.6 16.8 4.0 5.0 2.8 3.3 2.22 3.16 14,297 14,460
Iride 18.4 18.9 15.5 15.2 5.6 7.2 14.1 14.3 12.8 14.4 6.9 5.7 2.5 2.1 16.6 14.6 4.3 4.4 3.4 3.3 1.98 2.72 16,059 21,937
Svevo 19.2 20.5 17.6 14.7 6.8 8.0 12.8 12.8 13.5 13.6 4.5 5.1 1.7 1.7 16.6 15.6 4.3 4.6 3.2 3.5 2.20 2.98 19,808 15,693
Claudio 17.8 17.0 13.8 12.2 6.1 6.4 14.6 18.0 14.7 14.4 7.1 6.3 2.4 2.4 16.1 15.7 4.5 4.5 3.1 3.0 2.17 2.73 23,185 22,402
Saragolla 16.1 18.2 12.9 12.9 5.0 7.4 14.2 14.6 14.8 15.0 7.7 6.6 2.5 2.7 17.8 14.9 5.1 4.5 3.7 3.2 2.02 2.64 25,275 21,052
PR22D89 19.0 17.4 11.2 14.3 6.2 8.5 13.4 13.9 16.1 14.7 5.7 5.2 2.2 2.1 18.6 15.8 4.5 4.8 3.0 3.2 2.17 2.71 21,540 20,181
LSD 0.28 0.85 0.25 0.36 0.24 0.15 0.07 0.26 0.08 0.05 0.06 1,163

Least Significant Difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05.

Table 3.

Structures of dietary fibre components in wholemeal flours from old and modern Italian durum wheat genotypes, grown in two crop seasons, determined as percentages of AXOS and GOS from enzyme fingerprinting.

Genotype x x2 x3 x5 xa3xx xa3a3xx xa3xa3xx xa2+3xx xa3a2+3xx xa3xa2+3xx G3:G4 β-glucan peak are
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (ratio) (nC)
2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014

old
Dauno III 25.1 23.9 19.6 37.3 10.0 7.5 5.0 4.3 17.6 11.7 4.1 2.6 1.2 0.7 11.3 7.7 3.0 1.9 3.2 2.4 2.30 2.82 39,190 21,236
old Saragolla 25.1 22.7 21.6 36.9 9.5 8.1 3.6 2.0 16.3 13.0 3.2 2.1 1.2 1.0 12.4 9.1 3.0 2.2 4.0 2.7 2.30 3.36 38,278 18,285
Russello 25.6 27.3 21.2 30.9 9.3 6.5 5.0 4.6 15.9 12.3 4.1 3.8 1.0 0.9 11.3 9.1 3.0 2.1 3.6 2.4 2.44 2.72 40,881 23,568
Timilia R.B. 27.0 20.8 21.5 35.9 7.9 9.4 3.5 4.1 18.1 13.3 4.0 3.8 1.0 0.9 10.4 8.1 2.7 1.9 3.3 2.4 2.42 2.84 55,019 25,195
Cappelli 26.3 21.6 20.9 36.2 10.7 8.8 6.0 4.4 15.3 11.6 3.4 2.7 1.0 0.8 10.7 9.1 2.7 2.1 3.0 2.5 2.36 3.79 30,867 14,613
Garigliano 25.6 21.4 21.5 33.9 7.5 7.4 5.5 4.8 16.3 13.3 3.8 3.0 0.9 0.9 12.5 10.4 2.9 2.3 3.4 2.5 2.70 3.11 33,440 20,228
Grifoni 235 26.0 21.5 18.9 33.1 7.9 7.2 7.3 4.4 15.6 13.1 3.4 2.9 1.0 0.9 13.2 11.4 3.3 2.7 3.4 2.6 2.27 3.97 33,774 23,406
modern
Adamello 27.5 22.7 20.2 39.6 9.0 7.9 6.3 4.0 15.2 10.7 2.6 1.5 0.9 0.7 11.9 8.3 3.0 2.2 3.3 2.5 2.46 5.71 41,590 23,206
Simeto 22.7 28.6 36.7 23.6 10.2 7.2 2.1 4.4 13.4 14.3 2.1 2.5 1.1 0.9 9.7 10.1 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.9 2.56 4.84 21,980 32.461
Preco 24.3 21.9 18.2 37.9 8.4 7.6 5.7 3.0 15.5 11.3 3.9 2.5 1.2 1.7 12.3 9.2 3.2 2.5 7.3 2.5 2.43 3.98 63,886 22,179
Iride 28.5 20.4 24.7 39.1 7.3 9.0 4.5 5.8 15.5 10.5 3.2 1.9 0.9 0.7 9.9 7.4 2.6 2.1 3.3 2.8 2.52 2.80 47,092 33,305
Svevo 26.4 21.8 23.1 37.8 7.4 8.0 4.9 4.1 16.2 10.9 2.6 1.9 0.9 0.9 11.7 9.4 3.1 2.5 3.6 2.6 2.60 3.35 51,950 29,761
Claudio 23.9 21.4 21.7 35.8 10.8 7.3 7.0 5.7 16.2 11.9 3.3 2.6 0.9 1.0 10.0 9.0 2.9 2.5 3.3 2.7 2.52 2.97 60,886 30,866
Saragolla 28.2 20.9 22.9 36.7 8.3 7.7 4.2 5.3 14.9 11.3 2.9 3.1 1.0 1.0 11.1 9.0 3.0 2.3 3.4 3.0 2.55 2.79 52,471 33,626
PR22D89 25.6 20.2 20.3 34.9 8.8 9.2 4.8 4.2 16.8 12.5 3.3 2.8 1.0 0.9 12.5 10.2 3.2 2.5 3.5 2.5 2.46 3.57 57,894 24,381
LSD 1.08 0.78 0.53 0.21 0.37 0.11 0.04 0.34 0.09 0.43 0.10 3,075

Least significant difference (LSD) at P ≤ 0.05.

Table 4.

Correlation matrix of the main kernel quality parameters with year of release and with the content and composition of arabinoxylan (AX) and β-glucan in semolina and wholemeal flours of old and modern durum wheat genotypes.

YR TKW TW Tot-AX WE-AX RV
Grain parameters
TKW −0.24 1.00 0.42 −0.06 −0.30 −0.37
TW −0.02 0.42 1.00 −0.34 −0.76 −0.73
GPC −0.50 −0.08 −0.27 −0.36 −0.33
SPC −0.48 −0.18 −0.33 −0.04 −0.20 −0.48
Ash −0.06 0.03 −0.21 0.36 −0.17 −0.19
Semolina fibre components
Tot-AX 0.05 −0.06 −0.34 1.00 0.44 0.27
WE-AX −0.09 −0.30 −0.76 0.44 1.00 0.78
AX solubility −0.17 −0.29 −0.68 0.04 0.90 0.72
RV 0.14 −0.37 −0.73 0.27 0.78 1.00
%x −0.20 −0.07 −0.36 0.08 0.19 0.23
%x2 −0.36 0.02 −0.14 0.05 0.09 0.11
%x3 0.03 −0.23 −0.16 −0.02 0.27 0.47
%x5 0.60 0.02 0.26 −0.05 −0.22 −0.17
%xa3xx −0.29 −0.16 0.07 −0.18 0.04 −0.08
%xa2+3xx −0.01 0.30 −0.08 0.13 −0.03 −0.11
%xa3a3xx −0.41 0.05 0.45 −0.14 −0.19 −0.34
%xa3xa3xx −0.51 0.08 0.15 −0.04 −0.06 −0.30
%xa3a2+3xx 0.24 −0.06 −0.34 0.18 0.17 0.06
%xa3xa2+3xx 0.64 −0.28 −0.21 0.08 −0.01 0.10
G3: G4 ratio 0.04 −0.47 −0.75 0.17 0.64 0.56
β-glucan peak area 0.51 −0.14 0.47 −0.07 −0.34 −0.29
Wholemeal fibre components
Tot-AX 0.16 0.02 0.15 1.00 0.26
WE-AX 0.57 −0.24 0.01 0.26 1.00
AX solubility 0.53 −0.25 −0.04 −0.06 0.94
%x −0.06 0.22 0.24 −0.12 −0.16
%x2 0.08 −0.44 −0.47 0.16 0.22
%x3 −0.08 −0.07 0.07 −0.06 0.03
%x5 0.18 0.36 0.41 0.30 0.05
%xa3xx −0.21 0.39 0.49 −0.15 −0.23
%xa2+3xx −0.01 0.52 0.30 −0.28 −0.31
%xa3a3xx −0.42 0.39 0.44 0.04 −0.31
%xa3xa3xx 0.01 −0.04 −0.13 −0.29 −0.12
%xa3a2+3xx 0.18 0.35 0.35 −0.19 −0.13
%xa3xa2+3xx 0.13 0.27 0.31 −0.25 −0.05
G3: G4 ratio 0.18 −0.38 −0.83 −0.13 0.10
β-glucan peak area 0.33 0.13 0.55 −0.07 0.11

YR, year of release; TKE, thousand kernel weight; TW, test weight; Tot-AX, total arabinoxylan; WE-AX, water-extractable arabinoxylan; RV, relative viscosity.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Plant material

Grain samples from fifteen Italian durum wheat (Triticum turgidum spp. durum) genotypes, comprising four old landraces (Dauno III, old Saragolla, Russello, Timilia RB), three old cultivars (Cappelli, Garigliano and Grifoni 235) and eight modern cultivars bred after 1985 were analysed. These were obtained from the same two field trial (in 2013 and 2014) as reported in [2], but separate samples of grain were analysed. Plants were grown in a randomized complete block design with three replications on a clay–loam soil at Foggia (Italy, 41° 28′ N, 15° 32′ E and 75 m a.s.l.), as reported previously [2]. The two crop seasons were characterized by different amounts of rainfall during the grain development stage (54 mm and 153 mm respectively in 2013 and 2014).

Wholemeal and semolina flours were prepared using a Cyclotec Tecator 1093 sample mill (sieve 1 mm) and a laboratory mill (Bona, 4 cylinders, sieve 180 µm), respectively. Ash was determined by NIR using an Infratech 1241 Analyser (Foss, Hillerod, Denmark). Nitrogen was determined using the Dumas combustion method using a CNS Combustion Analyser (Leco Corp., St Paul, MN, USA) and % protein calculated as % N×5.7.

2.2. Enzyme fingerprinting of arabinoxylan and β-glucan

Enzyme fingerprinting of AX and β-glucan was as described by [3]. 100 mg aliquots of semolina and wholemeal flours were digested with endo 1,4 β-xylanase (E.C.3.2.1.8) (a xylanase of the GH11 group) and endo 1,3(4) glucanase (lichenase) (E.C.3.2.1.73) (both enzymes from Megazyme, Bray, Ireland) to digest arabinoxylan and β-glucan, respectively. The oligosaccharides were separated by HP-AEC and the peak areas of the arabinoxylan oligosaccharides (AXOS) were expressed as percentages of the total peak areas of all AXOS. The two major gluco-oligosaccharides (GOS) released by enzymatic digestion of β-glucan by lichenase comprised three glucose residues (G3) and four glucose residues (G4). Total β-glucan was therefore calculated as the sum of the G3 + G4 peak areas and the ratio of G3 to G4 fragments calculated.

2.3. Relative viscosity

Aqueous extracts were prepared from semolina as described by [4] but with an additional centrifugation step at 10,000 × g for 10 min at room temperature before filtration. They were stored on ice prior to measurement of relative viscosity (ηrel = t/t0, where t0: flow time of distilled water, 72–74 s) at 30 °C using an automated viscometer (AVS 370, SI Analytics, Germany) fitted with an Ostwald capillary tube (2 ml, diameter 0.4 mm). Values are the means of two extractions with the flow time of each extract being measured five times.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using as factors genotype and crop season. Least significant difference (LSD) was used at P≤0.05. ANOVA and correlation analyses were performed with software JMP (Version 8.0.2, SAS Institute Inc., 2009).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Pasquale De Vita from Consiglio per la Ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca per la Cerealicoltura (CREA-CER−Foggia, Italy) for providing grain seeds.

Acknowledgments

Funding sources

This research was supported by grants from Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca, Italy, projects: PON-PLASS (PONa3_00053). Rothamsted Research receives grant-aided support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the United Kingdom and the work reported here forms part of the Designing Future Wheat Institute Strategic Programme [BB/P016855/1].

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.12.029.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (17.1KB, docx)

References

  • 1.De Santis M.A., Kosik O., Passmore D., Flagella Z., Shewry P., Lovegrove A. Comparison of the dietary fibre composition of old and modern durum wheat (Triticum turgidum spp. durum) genotypes. Food Chem. 2018:304–310. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Santis M.A., Giuliani M.M., Giuzio L., Lovegrove A., Shewry P., Flagella Z. Differences in gluten protein composition between old and modern durum wheat genotypes in relation to 20th century breeding in Italy. Eur. J. Agron. 2017;87:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ordaz-Ortiz J.J., Saulnier L. Structural variability of arabinoxylans from wheat flour. Comparison of water-extractable and xylanase-extractable arabinoxylans. J. Cereal Sci. 2005;42:119–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saulnier L., Peneau N., Thibault J.F. Variability in grain extract viscosity and water-soluble arabinoxylan content in wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 1995;22(1995):259–264. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (17.1KB, docx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES