Abstract
In biological systems, there are many signal transduction cascades in which a chemical signal is transferred as a series of chemical events. Such successive reaction systems are advantageous because the efficiency of the functions can be finely controlled by regulatory enzymes at an earlier stage. However, most of artificial responsive molecules developed so far rely on single-step conversion, whose response speeds have been difficult to be controlled by external stimuli. In this context, developing artificial conversion systems that have a regulation step similar to the regulatory enzymes has been anticipated. Here we report a novel artificial two-step structural conversion system in which the response speed can be controlled based on a regulatory enzyme-like strategy. In this system, addition of fluoride ion caused desilylation of the siloxycarboxylate ion attached to a helical complex, resulting in the subsequent helicity inversion. The response speeds of the helicity inversion depended on the reactivity of the siloxycarboxylate ions; when a less-reactive siloxycarboxylate ion was used, the helicity inversion rate was governed by the desilylation rate. This is the first artificial responsive molecule in which the overall response speed can be controlled at the regulation step separated from the function step.
Introduction
In responsive molecules using a chemical stimulus, binding with a chemical species causes a structural change that leads to responsive functions (Fig. 1a). Representative examples in biological systems are allosteric enzymes1,2, which undergo a structural change upon binding with an effector, resulting in a responsive function. There are also many artificial responsive molecules using chemical species as the trigger3–8, and some of them are used to drive molecular machines9–11. In these systems, the response speeds are determined by the intrinsic reaction rates of the structural conversion, which are usually difficult to change without changing the reaction conditions.
Figure 1.
Concept and design of responsive functional systems based on a regulatory enzyme-like strategy. (a) One-step structural conversion for responsive function. (b) Multi-step structural conversion for responsive functions. The function activity (reaction rates) may be controlled at an earlier step called the regulation step. (c) Design of a new artificial system for helicity inversion mediated by desilylation of the coordinating siloxycarboxylate ions at the regulation step.
In biological systems, there are cascade systems in which a chemical signal is transferred as a series of chemical events prior to the structural changes leading to their functions (Fig. 1b)12–21. A significant feature of such successive reactions is that they have a regulatory enzyme (or a rate-limiting enzyme) that controls the efficiency of the functions not at the final function step, but at an earlier stage. This preceding step is important for fine-tuning of the overall activity. In artificial functional systems, however, there are rare examples of such signal transduction cascades whose functions are controlled at a prior stage in a series of two or more successive chemical events. Nevertheless, such a cascade system is advantageous, because a regulation step, which could control the overall response speed and/or time profiles of the functions, can be separated from the final function step (Fig. 1b). This would enable not only to switch on and off the functions, but also to set the activity at any level. In addition, the unique time-programmable features would be introduced in discrete functional molecular systems; such a time-programmable material, which has recently attracted increasing attention, has been achieved only in supramolecular aggregate systems22. In this context, developing artificial conversion systems that have a regulation step similar to the regulatory enzymes found in biomolecules has been anticipated.
Thus, we designed a novel simplified artificial system for a signal transduction cascade that enables a two-step conversion using fluoride ion as the signal input. The fluoride ion causes desilylation of a chiral siloxycarboxylate ion during the first step and this conversion controls the response speeds of the helicity inversion of dynamic helical complex LZn3La23–25 during the final step (Fig. 1c). Helicity inversion is one of the basic and important structural conversions26–34, because helical structures35–39 are ubiquitous structural motifs in various types of substances. In the present LZn3La system, the helicity is sensitively affected by structural differences in the chiral carboxylate ions40,41, whereas the helicity inversion rate is not significantly affected (thus called the intrinsic helix inversion rate, hereafter). These facts inspired us to design a system in which helicity inversion is driven by a slow chemical transformation in the coordinating carboxylate ions. In fact, there have been several helical metal complexes that can change their helix inversion rates23,42,43 by replacing the central metal ion. The time-programming in these systems needs to change the intrinsic helix inversion rates, whereas the helix inversion rates of the present system can be controlled at the regulation step without changing the intrinsic helix inversion rates. We now report this new type of two-step structural conversion in which the response speed of the helicity inversion at the final function step was effectively controlled at the regulation step using siloxycarboxylate ions with different reactivities.
Results and Discussion
Requirements for the F−-triggered helicity inversion in this system is that the carboxylate ions before and after the desilylation should induce opposite helicities of the LZn3La. Thus, we investigated the CD spectra of LZn3La in the presence of several chiral carboxylic acids (S1·H, S2·H, H1·H, and H2·H) (Fig. 2). DABCO (1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane) was used to deprotonate these carboxylic acids. We have already demonstrated that chiral carboxylate ions such as H1 − and H2 − efficiently shift the P/M equilibrium of the LZn3La helix and that two molecules of these carboxylate ions can interact with LZn3La from the CD spectroscopic titration experiments40,41. When the siloxycarboxylate ion, S1 − or S2 −, was present, a negative Cotton effect was observed at 350 nm, which is indicative of the (M)-helicity of LZn3La based on a comparison with related complexes44–47. In contrast, a positive Cotton effect was observed at 350 nm when the hydroxycarboxylate ion, H1 − or H2 −, was present under the same conditions. The observed differences in the signs of the Cotton effect should be attributed to the opposite preference of the (M)- and (P)-forms. Consequently, the-hydroxycarboxylate ions and the corresponding siloxy derivatives induced opposite helicities although they have the same stereoconfiguration. Therefore, we expected that, if the silyl group in S1 − and S2 − is removed by the reaction with fluoride ion, a responsive helicity inversion should take place.
Figure 2.
CD spectra of LZn3La (0.20 mM, acetonitrile/chloroform, 9:1, path length 1 mm, 295 K) in the presence of 3 equiv of chiral carboxylic acids (S1·H, S2·H, H1·H, and H2·H) and 3 equiv of DABCO.
Indeed, the addition of fluoride ion caused significant changes in the CD spectra. While the siloxycarboxylate ion S1 − induced a negative Cotton effect at 350 nm attributable to the (M)-helicity of LZn3La (Fig. 3a,i), the Cotton effect started to immediately decrease after the addition of 3 equiv of fluoride ion. The intensity decreased with approximate first-order kinetics and turned positive after 30 min. The spectral changes were almost completed after 100 min (Fig. 3 b,i) to result in a CD spectrum similar to that of the (P)-helical LZn3La in the presence of H1·H and DABCO (Fig. 2). This suggested that the siloxycarboxylate ion S1 − coordinating to LZn3La was converted into the desilylated derivative H1 −. This was clearly evidenced by the ESI-MS peak (m/z = 611.0 for [LZn3La + H1]2+) observed in the solution after reaction with the fluoride ion (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Figure 3.
CD spectral observation of helicity inversion triggered by F– addition. (a) CD spectral changes of LZn3La (0.20 mM, acetonitrile/chloroform, 9:1, path length 1 mm, 295 K) in the presence of siloxycarboxylic acid (3 equiv) and DABCO (3 equiv) after the addition of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (i, 3 equiv for S1·H; ii, 4 equiv for S2·H). (b) Time course of the CD intensity changes (352 nm).
Interestingly, the structures of the siloxycarboxylate ions significantly affected the response speeds of the helicity inversion. We similarly prepared the (M)-helical LZn3La complex by using the mandelate-based siloxycarboxylate ion S2 − in place of the lactate-based S1 −. This helical complex, LZn3La with S2 −, also showed a gradual decrease in the CD intensity after the addition of 3 equiv of fluoride ion, but the reaction was so slow that the CD signal did not turn positive even after 720 min (Supplementary Fig. S5). When the amount of fluoride ion was increased from 3 equiv to 4 equiv (Fig. 3a,ii), the helicity was inverted as observed for LZn3La with S1 −. However, the reaction was still significantly slow compared to the LZn3La–S1 − system; the CD signal turned positive after 120 min, but it took 650 min to complete the reaction (Fig. 3b,ii). The resultant CD spectrum ( + 23.9 mdeg at 350 nm, Fig. 3a,ii) was very similar to that of LZn3La in the presence of H2·H and DABCO ( + 23.7 mdeg at 350 nm, Fig. 2). This indicated that the siloxycarboxylate ion S2 − coordinating to LZn3La underwent desilylation to give the hydroxycarboxylate H2 −. This was confirmed by the ESI-MS peak after the reaction (m/z 641.9 for [LZn3La + H2]2+, Supplementary Fig. S6).
As already described, it is clear that the helicity inversion of LZn3La was triggered by the fluoride ion via the desilylation of S1 − or S2 − coordinating to the LZn3La helical complex. However, the LZn3La–S1 − system showed significantly faster response than the LZn3La–S2 − system. This difference should mainly arise from the different reactivity of the silyl groups in the carboxylate ions S1 − and S2 − toward the fluoride ion. In the case of the lactate-based S1 −, the silyl group was completely removed within 3 min (Supplementary Fig. S4), which was evidenced by the 1H NMR analysis. Since the observed half-life of the CD intensity changes (t 1/2 ≈ 20 min) was much longer than that of the desilylation (t 1/2 < 1 min), the response speed of the helicity inversion should be governed by the intrinsic helix inversion rate of the LZn3La scaffold44,45 (Fig. 4a). On the other hand, the 1H NMR analysis indicated that the desilylation of S2 − was very slow; the unreacted S2 − still remained even after 120 min (Supplementary Fig. S7). It should be noted that the observed response speed of the helicity inversion is much slower than the intrinsic helix inversion rate of the LZn3La scaffold. Obviously, the observable overall response speed of the helicity inversion is controlled at the desilylation step (Fig. 4b). Therefore, the helicity inversion of LZn3La was triggered by the fluoride ion, and the response speed was controlled at the regulation step of the signaling cascade by using the siloxycarboxylate ion without changing the intrinsic helix inversion rate.
Figure 4.
Schematic drawing for the helicity inversion triggered by F– addition. (a) R = Me (S1 −). The desilylation rate is very fast and the overall helicity inversion rate is governed by the intrinsic helicity inversion rate. (b) R = Ph (S2 −). The desilylation rate is slower than the intrinsic helicity inversion rate and governs the overall helicity inversion rate.
In summary, we have developed a new artificial signal transduction cascade system for controlling the helicity inversion speeds. The fluoride ion triggered two successive chemical events, e.g., desilylation of the siloxycarboxylate ions followed by helicity inversion of the LZn3La dynamic helix. The overall response speed was efficiently controlled at the regulation step of the signaling cascade, just like regulatory enzymes in biological systems, by using the slower desilylation of the siloxycarboxylate ions without changing the intrinsic helix inversion rates. Before this study, the control of the response speeds of functional molecules had been believed to require modification of their parent molecular framework. Our research of the function tuning at the regulation step in a signal transduction cascade could be applied to a variety of functional molecular systems that can control the response speed without altering the intrinsic nature of the functional molecules. In addition, this fine-tuning of the response speeds would open the way to new chemistry in which molecular machinery motions and chemical functions are controlled in a time-programmable fashion.
Methods
General procedures
All chemicals were reagent grade and used without further purification. Column chromatography was performed with Kanto Chemical silica gel 60 N (spherical, neutral). 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE600 spectrometer (600 MHz), a Bruker DPX400 (400 MHz), or a Bruker AVANCE400 spectrometer (400 MHz). In NMR measurements, tetramethylsilane was used as an internal standard (0 ppm). CD spectra were recorded on a JASCO J-820 spectropolarimeter at 295 K. Mass spectra (ESI-TOF, positive mode) were recorded on an Applied Biosystems QStar Pulsar i spectrometer.
Silylation of ethyl lactate (Fig. 5)
Under nitrogen atmosphere, tert-butyldimethylchlorosilane (10.0 g, 66.3 mmol) was added to a solution of (S)-ethyl lactate (7.2 mL, 63 mmol) and imidazole (5.15 g, 75.6 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (40 mL). The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. After addition of water, the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated to dryness. The crude oily product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, ethyl acetate/hexane, 2:100) to give ethyl (S)-2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)propanoate (E1 48) (15.6 g, quant.) as colorless oil, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.07 (s, 3 H), 0.10 (s, 3 H), 0.91 (s, 9 H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H), 1.39 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 4.14–4.21 (m, 2 H), 4.31 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1 H).
Figure 5.
Synthetic schemes for S1·H and S2·H.
Preparation of a stock solution of (S)-2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)propanoic acid (S1·H; Fig. 5)
An aqueous solution of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (49.3 mg, 1.17 mmol in 4 mL of water) was added dropwise to a solution of ester E1 (119 mg, 0.510 mmol) in THF (4 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature and then concentrated. The solution was acidified to pH 4–5 with aqueous KHSO4 solution (1 M) and extracted with chloroform. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and filtered. The product S1·H48 was stored as chloroform solution, because S1·H gradually decomposes without solvent. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.15 (s, 6 H), 0.94 (s, 9 H), 1.46 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 4.36 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H) (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Silylation of mandelic acid (H2·H; Fig. 5)
Under nitrogen atmosphere, tert-butyldimethylchlorosilane (307 mg, 2.04 mmol) was added to a solution of (S)-mandelic acid (H2·H, 96.0 mg, 0.631 mmol) and imidazole (190 mg, 2.79 mmol) in dry DMF (2 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 32 h at room temperature. After addition of water, the mixture was extracted with diethyl ether. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated. The crude oily product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, ethyl acetate/hexane, 3:7) to give ethyl (S)-2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-2-phenylacetate (E2 49) (230 mg, 0.605 mmol, 95%) as pale yellow oil, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.01 (s, 3 H), 0.11 (s, 3 H), 0.14 (s, 3 H), 0.19 (s, 3 H), 0.82 (s, 9 H), 0.91 (s, 9 H), 5.14 (s, 1 H), 7.26–7.33 (m, 3 H), 7.44–7.47 (m, 2 H).
Preparation of a stock solution of (S)-2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-2-phenylacetic acid (S2·H; Fig. 5)
A solution of potassium carbonate in 50% aqueous methanol (1 M, 30 mL) containing ester E2 (116 mg, 0.305 mmol) was heated to reflux for 1 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solution was concentrated. The residue was acidified to pH 4–5 with diluted hydrochloric acid (0.5 M) and the solution was extracted with chloroform. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and filtered. The product S2·H49 was stored as chloroform solution, because S2·H gradually decomposes without solvent. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ –0.02 (s, 3 H), 0.13 (s, 3 H), 0.94 (s, 9 H), 5.20 (s, 1 H), 7.34–7.43 (m, 5 H) (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Helicity inversion by F– addition
A chloroform solution of the siloxycarboxylic acids (S1·H or S2·H, 3 equiv) was added to an acetonitrile solution of LZn3La40 in the presence of DABCO (3 equiv). After 5 min, an acetonitrile solution of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (3 or 4 equiv) was added to the solution and the time course of the CD spectral changes was investigated. The solvent ratio of the solution was adjusted to be acetonitrile/chloroform = 9:1.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article (and its Supplementary Information files) and from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number JP16H06510 and JP26288022), Japan, and Kanazawa University CHOZEN Project.
Author Contributions
S.S. Conducted all of the synthesis and characterization of the materials as well as spectroscopic measurements. S.A. initiated and guided this work discussing with T.N. All three authors participated in the writing and editing of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-16503-1.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Shigehisa Akine, Email: akine@se.kanazawa-u.ac.jp.
Tatsuya Nabeshima, Email: nabesima@chem.tsukuba.ac.jp.
References
- 1.Ricard J, Cornish-Bowden A. Co-operative and allosteric enzymes: 20 years on. Eur. J. Biochem. 1987;166:255–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13510.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fastrez J. Engineering allosteric regulation into biological catalysts. ChemBioChem. 2009;10:2824–2835. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200900590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tabushi I. Artificial allosteric systems. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988;60:581–586. doi: 10.1351/pac198860040581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nabeshima T. Regulation of ion recognition by utilizing information at the molecular level. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1996;148:151–169. doi: 10.1016/0010-8545(95)01164-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Takeuchi M, Ikeda M, Sugasaki A, Shinkai S. Molecular design of artificial molecular and ion recognition systems with allosteric guest responses. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001;34:865–873. doi: 10.1021/ar0000410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schneider H-J. Efficiency parameters in artificial allosteric systems. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016;14:7994–8001. doi: 10.1039/C6OB01303A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nabeshima T. Construction of cooperative and responsive supramolecular systems for molecular functional modulation. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2010;83:969–991. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.20100017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang D-W, Zhao X, Li Z-T. Aromatic amide and hydrazide foldamer-based responsive host−guest systems. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014;47:1961–1970. doi: 10.1021/ar5000242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang M, Yan X, Huang F, Niu Z, Gibson HW. Stimuli-responsive host–guest systems based on the recognition of cryptands by organic guests. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014;47:1995–2005. doi: 10.1021/ar500046r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ariga K, Ito H, Hill JP, Tsukube H. Molecular recognition: from solution science to nano/materials technology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:5800–5835. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35162e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cheng C, Stoddart JF. Wholly synthetic molecular machines. ChemPhysChem. 2016;17:1780–1793. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201501155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Traut, T. Allosteric Regulatory Enzymes (Springer, New York, 2008).
- 13.Kemp BE, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase, super metabolic regulator. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2003;31:162–168. doi: 10.1042/bst0310162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wendel AA, Lewin TM, Coleman RA. Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferases: Rate limiting enzymes of triacylglycerol biosynthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1791:501–506. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shantz LM, Pegg AE. Translational regulation of ornithine decarboxylase and other enzymes of the polyamine pathway. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1999;31:107–122. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(98)00135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kavanagh KL, Jörnvall H, Persson B, Oppermann U. The SDR superfamily: functional and structural diversity within a family of metabolic and regulatory enzymes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008;65:3895–3906. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Galili G. Regulation of lysine and threonine synthesis. Plant Cell. 1995;7:899–906. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.7.899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bolger GB. Molecular biology of the cyclic AMP-specific cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: a diverse family of regulatory enzymes. Cell. Signalling. 1994;6:851–859. doi: 10.1016/0898-6568(94)90018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schreurs M, Kuipers F, van der Leij FR. Regulatory enzymes of mitochondrial β-oxidation as targets for treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Obes. Rev. 2010;11:380–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00642.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kent C. Regulatory enzymes of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis: a personal perspective. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2005;1733:53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2004.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ross EM, Wilkie TM. GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins: regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) and RGS-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000;69:795–827. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Korevaar PA, et al. Pathway complexity in supramolecular polymerization. Nature. 2012;481:492–496. doi: 10.1038/nature10720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Akine, S., Taniguchi, T., Matsumoto, T. & Nabeshima, T. Guest-dependent inversion rate of a tetranuclear single metallohelicate. Chem. Commun. 4961–4963 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 24.Akine, S. & Nabeshima, T. Cyclic and acyclic oligo(N2O2) ligands for cooperative multi-metal complexation. Dalton Trans. 10395–10408 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Akine S. Novel ion recognition systems based on cyclic and acyclic oligo(salen)-type ligands. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2012;72:25–54. doi: 10.1007/s10847-011-0026-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rich A, Zhang S. Z-DNA: the long road to biological function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003;4:566–572. doi: 10.1038/nrg1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fuertes MA, Cepeda V, Alonso C, Pérez JM. Molecular mechanisms for the B–Z transition in the example of poly[d(G–C)•d(G–C)] polymers. A critical review. Chem. Rev. 2006;106:2045–2064. doi: 10.1021/cr050243f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kang YK, Jhon JS, Park HS. Conformational preferences of proline oligopeptides. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:17645–17655. doi: 10.1021/jp0629792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Maeda K, Morino K, Yashima E. Macromolecular helicity inversion of poly(phenylacetylene) derivatives induced by various external stimuli. Macromol. Symp. 2003;201:135–142. doi: 10.1002/masy.200351116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yashima E, Maeda K. Chirality-responsive helical polymers. Macromolecules. 2008;41:3–12. doi: 10.1021/ma071453s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Crassous J. Chiral transfer in coordination complexes: towards molecular materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:830–845. doi: 10.1039/b806203j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Crassous J. Transfer of chirality from ligands to metal centers: recent examples. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:9684–9692. doi: 10.1039/c2cc31542d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Canary JW. Redox-triggered chiroptical molecular switches. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:747–756. doi: 10.1039/b800412a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Miyake H, Tsukube H. Coordination chemistry strategies for dynamic helicates: time-programmable chirality switching with labile and inert metal helicates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:6977–6991. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35192g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1995).
- 36.Piguet C, Bernardinelli G, Hopfgartner G. Helicates as versatile supramolecular complexes. Chem. Rev. 1997;97:2005–2062. doi: 10.1021/cr960053s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Albrecht M. “Let’s twist again”—double-stranded, triple-stranded, and circular helicates. Chem. Rev. 2001;101:3457–3497. doi: 10.1021/cr0103672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hill DJ, Mio MJ, Prince RB, Hughes TS, Moore JS. A field guide to foldamers. Chem. Rev. 2001;101:3893–4011. doi: 10.1021/cr990120t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yashima E, Maeda K, Iida H, Furusho Y, Nagai K. Helical polymers: synthesis, structures, and functions. Chem. Rev. 2009;109:6102–6211. doi: 10.1021/cr900162q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sairenji S, Akine S, Nabeshima T. Dynamic helicity control of single-helical oligooxime metal complexes by coordination of chiral carboxylate ions. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014;55:1987–1990. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sairenji S, Akine S, Nabeshima T. Dynamic helicity control of a single-helical oligooxime complex and acid–base-triggered repeated helicity inversion mediated by amino acids. Chem. Lett. 2014;43:1107–1109. doi: 10.1246/cl.140263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Miyake H, Kamon H, Miyahara I, Sugimoto H, Tsukube H. Time-programmed peptide helix inversion of a synthetic metal complex triggered by an achiral NO3− anion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:792–793. doi: 10.1021/ja0768385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gregoliński J, et al. Helical lanthanide(III) complexes with chiral nonaaza macrocycle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:17761–17773. doi: 10.1021/ja805033j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Akine, S., Matsumoto, T. & Nabeshima, T. Spontaneous formation of a chiral supramolecular superhelix in the crystalline state using a single-stranded tetranuclear metallohelicate. Chem. Commun. 4604–4606 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 45.Akine S, Hotate S, Matsumoto T, Nabeshima T. Spontaneous enrichment of one-handed helices by dissolution of quasiracemic crystals of a tetranuclear single helical complex. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:2925–2927. doi: 10.1039/c0cc04998k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Akine S, Hotate S, Nabeshima T. A molecular leverage for helicity control and helix inversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:13868–13871. doi: 10.1021/ja205570z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Akine S, Sairenji S, Taniguchi T, Nabeshima T. Stepwise helicity inversions by multisequential metal exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:12948–12951. doi: 10.1021/ja405979v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mayer SC, Ramanjulu J, Vera MD, Pfizenmayer AJ, Joullié MM. Synthesis of new didemnin B analogs for investigations of structure/biological activity relationships. J. Org. Chem. 1994;59:5192–5205. doi: 10.1021/jo00097a022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bremner JB, Perkins DF. Synthesis of functionalised azecine and azonine derivatives via an enolate assisted aza Claisen rearrangement. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:2659–2665. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2005.01.061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article (and its Supplementary Information files) and from the corresponding author on reasonable request.





