Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Current Medical Mycology logoLink to Current Medical Mycology
. 2017 Jun;3(2):26–32. doi: 10.29252/cmm.3.2.26

The efficacy of gaseous ozone against different forms of Candida albicans

M Zargaran 1,2, M Fatahinia 1,2, A Zarei Mahmoudabadi 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5763895  PMID: 29354778

Abstract

Background and Purpose:

Ozone is an inorganic molecule with effective antimicrobial properties. Clinical treatment of ozonated water was used for the elimination of Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, endotoxins, and biofilms from root canals. In addition, its therapeutic effects for tinea pedis, ulcers, and leishmaniasis were investigated. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the fungicidal effects of ozone on different forms of C. albicans. In addition, antifungal susceptibility profile of strains was assessed before and after exposure to ozone.

Materials and Methods:

Fifty strains of C. albicans were exposed to gaseous ozone at different times. Furthermore, biofilm formation and germ tube production were evaluated when yeast suspensions were exposed to ozone. In addition, antifungal susceptibility of ozone resistant colonies was investiagted as compared to controls.

Results:

Ozone was highly effective in killing C. albicans in yeast form and inhibition of germ tube formation during 210 and 180 s, respectively. Although with increasing exposure time biofilm production was considerably decreased, resistance to ozone was much higher among vaginal and nail isolates even after 60 min. All the strains were sensitive to fluconazole, caspofungin, and terbinafine pre- and post-ozone exposure. Resistance to amphotericin B was significantly enhanced after exposure to ozone.

Conclusion:

Although ozone was highly effective on the yeast form of C. albicans and it can inhibit the formation of germ tubes in C. albicans, the complete removal of biofilms did not happen even after 60 min. It seems that ozone therapy induces resistance to amphotericin B.

Key Words: Amphotericin B, Candida albicans, Caspofungin, Fluconazole, Gaseous ozone

Introduction

Ozone, trioxygen (O3), is a highly reactive inorganic molecule. It is a natural part of the atmosphere also produced by ozone generators. Although ozone was discovered in the mid-nineteenth century, its medicinal usage was discovered during the recent decades. It was found that ozone is one of the best microorganism killers. As such, it has antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, and anti-parasitic properties [1-3]. In addition, ozonated oils (oleozone) are used in the medical and pharmaceutical products [4] and in textile [3] and food industries [5].

Decontamination of medical wastes in hospitals is another application of ozone that was first proposed by Coronel et al. [6]. Furthermore, in a study, ozonated water reduced the CFU/ml of Candida albicans on denture plates [7]. Some other applications of ozone are disinfection and removing the toothbrushes bristles microbiota [8] and as a fungicidal and detoxifying agent of aflatoxins in peanuts [9]. Some studies have shown that the combination of ozone with chlorhexidine 2% had synergistic effects against C. albicans and Enterococcus faecalis [10]. Moreover, ozonized olive oil showed antifungal activity against dermatophytes such as Microsporum canis and Trichophyton rubrum [11].

Recently, clinical treatments by ozonated water have been used for the elimination of C. albicans [2], E. faecalis [2], endotoxins [2], and biofilms [12] from root canals. In addition, ozonated water is applied for the sterilization of contaminated dental instruments with Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, C. albicans, and Bacillus atrophaeus spores [13]. Therapeutic effects of ozone on arthritis [4], cutaneous infections [1], tinea pedis [14], and ulcers [4] were investigated by different researchers. Zanardi et al. evaluated the effects of ozonated oils for the treatment of cutaneous infections; they concluded that these compounds are highly promising in the treatment of cutaneous infections [1]. Furthermore, in a study on recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, it was found that ozonized distilled water cured the disease among 85% of patients, 10% remained asymptomatic, and only 5% did not respond to ozone therapy [15]. The efficacy of ozonated olive oil against Leishmania promastigote was investigated by Rajabi et al., who noted that its effect was dose dependent [16].

Objectives

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the fungicidal effects of gaseous ozone on some strains of C. albicans in yeast form, germ tube formation, and biofilm production. In addition, antifungals susceptibility profile of the tested strains was assessed before and after ozone exposure.

Materials and Methods

Candida albicans strains

Fifty C. albicans strains originating from different sources were used for the in vitro experiments. Ten isolates from patients with vaginitis, 10 isolates from cases of nail infection, 10 isolates from oral cavity of neutropenic patients, and 10 isolates from urine samples of patients with candiduria were clinically isolates. All the C. albicans strains were previously identified and stored in the Department of Medical Mycology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. All the 40 strains were re-identified using the routine mycological tests including morphology and microscopy on Corn Meal Agar (Difco, USA) with 1% Tween 80, germ tube formation, growth at 45ºC, and green colony production on CHROMagar Candida (CHROMagar Candida, France) [17]. Furthermore, 10 environmental strains of C. albicans were isolated from environmental materials and detected using the above-mentioned tests.

The influence of ozone on the inhibition of Candida albicans growth

An overnight culture of each strain was prepared on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) plates (Biolife, Italy) and incubated at 37ºC. Suspensions were prepared in sterile distilled water and standardized using 0.5 McFarland (1-5×106 CFU/ml). In the present study, gaseous ozone was freshly produced by an ozone gas generator machine (Purus WA600, Canada). The concentration of the produced ozone was 400 mg/h. Eight sterile falcon tubes containing 5 ml of diluted standard yeast suspension (1:2) was prepared (0.5-2.5×106 CFU/ml). Seven suspensions were exposed to gaseous ozone for 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 210 s using flow of ozone gas by a sterile micropipette tip. The eighth suspension falcon was selected as the positive control. Then, 5 µl of each suspension was inoculated on SDA plates and incubated at 37ºC for 48 h. Growth colonies were counted and CFU/ml was calculated [18].

The influence of ozone on the inhibition of germ tube formation of Candida albicans

An overnight culture of the tested C. albicans strains on SDA was prepared, and then a loopful of a colony was suspended in 0.5 ml of fresh human serum. For each strain, seven tubes containing 0.5 ml of yeast suspension were prepared. Six tubes were exposed to gaseous ozone for 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 s and one tube was used as control without ozone exposure (as described above). The tubes were incubated at 37ºC for 3 h, and then they were examined microscopically for germ tube formation. The presence of germ tubes was counted and compared with control (3+) as 3+, 2+, 1+, and negative.

The influence of ozone on biofilm formation of Candida albicans

Biofilm formation was performed as previously described [19]. Briefly, 20 µl of each yeast suspension and 180 µl of SDA supplemented with 8% glucose (Merck, Germany) were added to each microplate well. Seven series of inoculated microplates were prepared. Microplates were incubated at 37ºC for 48 h and then washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in trice. Each microplate was separately put in a sterile zipped plastic bag and exposed to a flow of ozone for 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min. One microplate was selected as positive control. Then, 200 µl of RPMI-1640 (Bio IDEA, Iran) that contained 0.01% resazurin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was added to each well and incubated at 37ºC for 24-48 h. Viable biofilm cells can grow and change the blue color to red.

The influence of ozone on antifungal susceptibility testing

A stock solution of 32 mg/ml for amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), fluconazole (Serva, USA), and terbinafine (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and1.25 mg/ml of caspofungin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Fluka, Germany) and stored at -20ºC. Furthermore, a serial dilution of each antifungal was prepared with RPMI-1640 0.01% resazurin, including amphotericin B from 0.125 to 16 µg/ml, fluconazole from 0.125 to 16 µg/ml, terbinafine from 2 to 256 µg/ml, and caspofungin from 0.03125 to 4 µg/ml.

A standard suspension of overnight growth colonies of each strain was prepared before and after ozone exposure. The suspensions were diluted using RPMI-1640 0.01% resazurin [20]. Then, 100 µl of diluted suspensions and 100 µl of serial dilution of antifungals were inoculated into each microplate well [21, 22]. The microplates were incubated at 37ºC for 24-48 h, and then minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each strain was detected based on indicator changes.

Statistical analysis

The obtained data were calculated as frequency and presented in the four figures and one table. In addition, the sensitivity of isolates to amphotericin B and terbinafine was analysed by using Chi-squared test in SPSS, version 22. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Our results revealed that ozone is highly effective in killing C. albicans since a reduction of the microorganism concentration was observed during the contact time with ozone. This reduction was initially started after 30 s of zone exposure and fully observed after 210 s (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The effect of ozone on colony forming units of Candida albicans

As shown in Figure 2, vaginal and oral isolates were more resistant to ozone followed by nail, environmental, and urine isolates. Our study demonstrated that only urine isolates were fully inactivated at 150 s, whereas the other isolates were completely inhibited after 210 s.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The effect of ozone on Candida albicans from different sources

In the present study, we examined the effect of ozone on germ tube production in C. albicans strains at different times. Our results presented that the production of germ tube in C. albicans could be affected by different exposure times to ozone. In comparison with control (germ tube formation=3+), with increasing exposure time, the total number of germ tubes decreased (30 s). Furthermore, after 150 s exposure to ozone, 24% of the isolates failed to form germ tubes, and germ tube formation was completely inhibited after 180 s (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The effect of ozone on germ tube formation in Candida albicans

The sensitivity of C. albicans biofilm against ozone was also evaluated. Generally, as shown in Figure 4, with increasing exposure time, biofilm formation was considerably diminished. However, resistance to ozone was much higher among vaginal isolates, followed by nail strains. Other strains were completely inhibited at 20 or 30 min.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The effect of ozone on biofilm formation in Candida albicans

The impact of ozone on susceptibility of Candida albicans to antifungals

The tested C. albicans strains were susceptible to fluconazole with MIC ranging from < 0.125 to 4 µg/ml before ozone exposure, whereas this range decreased to <0.125-2 µg/ml after exposure (Table 1). MIC50 and MIC90 of fluconazole against the isolates were respectively 0.5 and 1 for both conditions, pre- and post-ozone therapy. In general, all the isolates were sensitive (MIC ≤ 8 μg/ml) to fluconazole in both conditions. The details of sensitivity of the isolates to caspofungin are presented in Table 1. The effect of caspofungin against the strains was completely similar pre- and post-ozone exposure, that is, all the strains were within the MIC range of <0.031-1 µg/ml. In addition, MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.25 and 0.5 for both conditions, respectively. All the isolates pertainedto the sensitive range (susceptible, MIC < 1) of caspofungin.

Table 1.

MIC range, MIC50, and MIC90 for the isolates against antifungal agents before and after exposure to ozone

Antifungals Isolates sources
Total P Value
Vaginitis
Oral cavity
Nail
Urine
Environment
Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After
Fluconazole MIC range 0.5-4 0.5-1 <0.125-1 <0.125-1 0.25-1 0.25-1 0.5-2 0.5-2 0.5-1 0.5-2 <0.125-4 <0.125-2 No resistant observed
MIC50 0.5 1 <0.125 <0.125 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
MIC90 2 1 <0.125 <0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1
Caspofungin MIC range 0.125-0.5 0.25-0.5 <0.031-0.25 <0.031-0.25 0.0625-0.5 0.0625-0.25 0.25-0.5 0.25-0.5 0.25-1 0.25-1 <0.031-1 <0.031-1 No resistant observed
MIC50 0.25 0.25 0.125 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25
MIC90 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5
Amphotericin B MIC range <0.125-8 <0.125-4 <0.125 <0.125-4 <0.125-16 <0.125-8 <0.125 <0.125-16 <0.125-16 <0.125-8 <0.125-16 <0.125-16 P=0.006
MIC50 <0.125 <0.125 <0.125 <0.125 8 1 <0.125 4 <0.125 1 <0.125 1
MIC90 <0.125 8 <0.125 4 16 8 <0.125 8 <0.125 4 8 8
Terbinafine MIC range <2->256 <2->256 <2->256 <2->256 <2->256 <2->256 <2->256 <2-256 <2-256 <2->256 <2->256 <2->256 P=0.689
MIC50 256 256 <2 <2 256 256 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 4
MIC90 >256 >256 >256 >256 256 >256 256 16 256 >256 >256 >256
Open in a new tab

Although the MIC range of terbinafine against the isolates was similar before and after exposure to ozone (<2 - >256 µg/ml), its MIC50 was considerably different (<2 µg/ml before and 4 µg/ml after exposure). However, there was no significant difference (P=0.689) among the isolates in susceptibility to terbinafine. When the strains were exposed to ozone, their MIC range and MIC90 for amphotericin B were completely similar to the unexposed ones (<0.125-16 and 8 µg/ml). On the other hand, MIC50 was increased from <0.125 to 1 after ozone exposure (Table 1). Overall, there was a significant difference (P=0.006) in the effect of ozone on the sensitivity of the isolates to amphotericin B.

MIC breakpoints set by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute were as follows: for amphotericin B, (susceptible, MIC < 2 μg/ml; resistant MIC ≥2 μg/ml) [23], terbinafine (susceptible, MIC ≤8 μg/ml; resistant, MIC >8 µg/ml) [24], fluconazole (susceptible, MIC ≤ 8 μg/ml; dose dependent, 16-32 μg/ml; resistant, MIC ≥ 64 µg/ml) [25], caspofungin (susceptible, MIC < 1 μg/ml; resistant, MIC ≥ 2µg/ml) [26].

Discussion

Ozone is a chemical compound composed of three oxygen atoms that has higher energy content than atmospheric oxygen. This compound has medicinal (for disinfecting and treating microbial infections and non-microbial diseases), industrial, and agricultural applications [1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 27]. Ozone is used in the treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis [15], and it has synergistic effect with chlorhexidine for the treatment of infected root canals [10].

In the present study, an ozone generator with an output of 6.7 mg/min of ozone started inactivation of the yeasts at 30 s, and fungicidal activity was fully completed after 210 s. In a study by Restaino et al., the inactivation of a 104-106 CFU/ml suspension of C. albicans was observed after 5 min of ozone exposure [5]. da Silva Faria et al. believed that clinical strains of Candida were more resistant to ozone than non-clinical isolates. They found that ozone exposure for 5 min was not fully effective in the inactivation of these types of isolates [18]. Furthermore, in a studyby Cardoso et al., the complete inactivation of C. albicans was observed after 40 min of exposure to ozonated water with 600 ppm ozone [2]. On the other hand, in brushes bristles exposed to ozonated PBS, complete sanitation was observed after 30 min [8]. Our results indicated that the most resistant isolates to ozone were those of the oral cavity and vulvovaginal candidiasis (same effect). Whereas urine isolates of C. albicans were more sensitive to ozone than the other isolates, such that after 150 s of exposure, they were fully inhibited by ozone. It seems that other factors, such as the initial suspension concentration and sources of isolates, could affect fungicidal activity of ozone.

Germ tube formation in C. albicans is the first step in adhesion to host tissues and acrylic surfaces, therefore, it is considered as one of the important pathogenic factors. In a study by Ali et al. on diabetic foot ulcer isolates, germ tube formation in C. albicans was completely inhibited when exposed to 3 ppm for 180 min [28]. In contrast, in our study, germ tube inhibition started at 60 s exposure and completely stopped at 180 s.

The biofilms of C. albicans are resistant to several antifungals and their elimination plays a major role in the treatment of the disease [29]. The previous studies have shown that ozone is a suitable tool for the removal of biofilm from dentures [30]. Therefore, considering the formation of biofilms, especially in catheters, urethral catheters, and dentures, and their resistance to antifungals, it can be stated that ozone gas can help eliminate biofilms. Interestingly, in our study, biofilms produced by vaginal and nail isolates showed greater resistance to ozone than the other isolates, which is in accordance with its yeast form resistance. In a study, 30 min exposure of acrylic dentures to high concentrations of ozonated water at 60°C completely removed Candida biofilms [31]. In another study on yeast biofilm, it was found that the disinfecting action of ozone was less effective than the yeast form [32]. In our study, vaginal and nail isolates were resistant to ozone even after 60 min of exposure, which was confirmed by Müller et al., who believed that ozone was not able to completely eliminate biofilms [33].

Geweely has shown that ozonized olive oil (oleozone) damages DNA and RNA in C. albicans [11]. Furthermore, effect on microorganism extracellular enzymes, as well as oxidation of phospholipids and lipoproteins are the other effects reported by researchers [4]. There are few reports on DNA damages caused by ozone and their association with antibiotic sensitivity. In addition, data regarding susceptibility to antifungal drugs in Candida species exposed to ozone is not available. Therefore, if ozone-resistant isolates are modified and resistant to antifungal drugs, they can aggravate the risk of disease and failure to respond to antifungal drugs. Our study did not reflect any changes in the sensitivity of C. albicans to fluconazole and caspofungin after exposure to ozone. All the isolates were sensitive to both antifungal agents before and after exposure to ozone. Although the number of resistant isolates to terbinafine increased from 23 to 25, this difference was not significant (P=0.689).In contrast, resistance to amphotericin B among C. albicans isolates increased significantly after ozone exposure (P=0.006). Thus, it seems that ozone induces resistance to amphotericin B, while it does not change sensitivity or resistance to other antifungal agents.

Conclusion

Ozone is particularly effective in the growth of the yeast forms of C. albicans and has high fungicidal activity at 210 s exposure. Furthermore, it can prevent the formation of germ tubes in C. albicans; however, the complete removal of biofilms was not possible even after 60 min. It seems that ozone therapy was not effective in inducing resistance to fluconazole, caspofungin, and terbinafine in Candida isolates, with the exception of amphotericin B, against which resistance was significantly enhanced after ozone exposure.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Health Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences for their support.

Author’s contribution

Z. M. and M. F. contributed to study conception and design. M. Z. conducted the experiments. M. Z., M. F., and A. Z.M. performed the data analysis and interpretation of the results. A. Z.M. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M. F. performed the critical revision of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Financial disclosure

This study was derived from an MSc thesis (Mahdis Zargaran) supported by a grant (No: OG 94137) from Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

References

  • 1.Zanardi I, Burgassi S, Paccagnini E, Gentile M, Bocci V, Travagli V. What is the best strategy for enhancing the effects of topically applied ozonated oils in cutaneous infections? Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:702949. doi: 10.1155/2013/702949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cardoso MG, de Oliveira LD, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO. Effectiveness of ozonated water on Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, and endotoxins in root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2008;105(3):e85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ozyildiz F, Karagonlu S, Basal G, Uzel A, Bayraktar O. Micro-encapsulation of ozonated red pepper seed oil with antimicrobial activity and application to nonwoven fabric. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013;56(3):168–79. doi: 10.1111/lam.12028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Elvis A, Ekta J. Ozone therapy: a clinical review. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2011;2(1):66–70. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.82319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Restaino L, Frampton EW, Hemphill JB, Palnikar P. Efficacy of ozonated water against various food-related microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(9):3471–5. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.9.3471-3475.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coronel B, Duroselle P, Behr H, Moskovtchenko JF, Freney J. In situ decontamination of medical wastes using oxidative agents: a 16-month study in a polyvalent intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2002;50(3):207–12. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arita M, Nagayoshi M, Fukuizumi T, Okinaga T, Masumi S, Morikawa M, et al. Microbicidal efficacy of ozonated water against Candida albicans adhering to acrylic denture plates. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005;20(4):206–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2005.00213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bezirtzoglou E, Cretoiu SM, Moldoveanu M, Alexopoulos A, Lazar V, Nakou M. A quantitative approach to the effectiveness of ozone against microbiota organisms colonizing toothbrushes. J Dent. 2008;36(8):600–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Alencar ER, Faroni LR, Soares Nde F, da Silva WA, Carvalho MC. Efficacy of ozone as a fungicidal and detoxifying agent of aflatoxins in peanuts. J Sci Food Agri. 2012;92(4):899–905. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Noites R, Pina-Vaz C, Rocha R, Carvalho MF, Goncalves A, Pina-Vaz I. Synergistic antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine and ozone in endodontic treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:592423. doi: 10.1155/2014/592423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Geweely NS. Antifungal activity of ozonized olive oil (Oleozone) Int J Agri Biol. 2006;8(5):671–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huth KC, Quirling M, Maier S, Kamereck K, Alkhayer M, Paschos E, et al. Effectiveness of ozone against endodontopathogenic microorganisms in a root canal biofilm model. Int Endod J. 2009;42(1):3–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cesar J, Sumita TC, Junqueira JC, Jorge AO, do Rego MA. Antimicrobial effects of ozonated water on the sanitization of dental instruments contaminated with E coli S aureus C albicans or the spores of B atrophaeus. J Infect Public Health. 2012;5(4):269–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Menendez S, Falcon L, Simon DR, Landa N. Efficacy of ozonized sunflower oil in the treatment of tinea pedis. Mycoses. 2002;45(8):329–32. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2002.00780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schwartz A. Ozone therapy in the treatment of recurrent vulvo-vaginitis by Candida albicans. Rev Española Ozonoter. 2015;5(1):99–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rajabi O, Sazgarnia A, Abbasi F, Layegh P. The activity of ozonated olive oil against Leishmania major promastigotes. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2015;18(9):915–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Salehei Z, Seifi Z, Zarei Mahmoudabadi A. Sensitivity of vaginal isolates of Candida to eight antifungal drugs isolated from Ahvaz, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2012;5(4):574–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.da Silva Faria I, Ueno M, Koga-Ito CY, Urruchi WI, Balducci I, Jorge AO. Effects of ozonated water on Candida albicans oral isolates. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2005;4(14):783–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bachmann SP, Vande Walle K, Ramage G, Patterson TF, Wickes BL, Graybill JR, et al. In vitro activity of caspofungin against Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(11):3591–6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.11.3591-3596.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gharaghani M, Rezaei-Matehkolaei A, Zarei Mahmoudabadi A, Keikhaei B. The frequency, antifungal susceptibility and enzymatic profiles of Candida species isolated from neutropenic patients. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9(11):e41446. doi: 10.5812/jjm.41446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reference method for broth dilution abtifungal suceptibility testing of yeasts. M27-A3. 3rd ed. Pennsylvania, USA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Badiee P, Badali H, Diba K, Ghadimi Moghadam A, Hosseininasab A, Jafarian H, et al. Susceptibility pattern of Candida albicans isolated from Iranian patients to antifungal agents. Curr Med Mycol. 2016;2(1):24–9. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.cmm.2.1.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.St-Germain G, Laverdière M, Pelletier R, René P, Bourgault AM, Lemieux C, et al. Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of bloodstream Candida isolates in Quebec: report on 453 cases between 2003 and 2005. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2008;19(1):55–62. doi: 10.1155/2008/634046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rathod VS, Raut JS, Karuppayil SM. In vitro antifungal susceptibility reveals occurrence of azole resistance among clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2012;5(3):170–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pfaller MA. Antifungal drug resistance: mechanisms, epidemiology, and consequences for treatment. Am J Med. 2012;125(1 Suppl):S3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rezaei-Matehkolaei A, Shafiei S, Zarei-Mahmoudabadi A. Isolation, molecular identification, and antifungal susceptibility profiles of vaginal isolates of Candida species. Iran J Microbiol. 2016;8(6):410–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hubbezoglu I, Zan R, Tunç T, Sumer Z, Hurmuzlu F. Antifungal efficacy of aqueous and gaseous ozone in root canals infected by Candida albicans. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2013;6(5):e8150. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ali EM. Ozone application for preventing fungal infection in diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetol Croatica. 2013;42(1):3–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zarei Mahmoudabadi A, Zarrin M, Kiasat N. Biofilm formation and susceptibility to amphotericin B and fluconazole in Candida albicans. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7(7):e17105. doi: 10.5812/jjm.17105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Arita M, Nagayoshi M, Fukuizumi T, Okinaga T, Masumi S, Morikawa M, et al. Microbicidal efficacy of ozonated water against Candida albicans adhering to acrylic denture plates. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005;20(4):206–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2005.00213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wiench R, Ilków A, Dziedzic A, Wojtyczka R, Cieślik-wegemund M, Kubicka-musiał M, et al. The eradication of Candida spp from removable dentures exposed to ozonated water. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:109. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mohammadi Z, Soltani MK, Shalavi S. An update on the management of endodontic biofilms using root canal irrigants and medicaments. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(2):89–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Müller P, Guggenheim B, Schmidlin PR. Efficacy of gasiform ozone and photodynamic therapy on a multispecies oral biofilm in vitro. European J Oral Sci. 2007;115(1):77–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Medical Mycology are provided here courtesy of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES