Abstract
Purpose: To establish small-sized superparamagnetic polymeric micelles for magnetic resonance and fluorescent dual-modal imaging, we investigated the feasibility of MR imaging (MRI) and macrophage-targeted in vitro.
Methods: A new class of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) and Nile red-co-loaded mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION polymeric micelles was synthesized to label Raw264.7 cells. The physical characteristics of the polymeric micelles were assessed, the T2 relaxation rate was calculated, and the effect of labeling on the cell viability and cytotoxicity was also determined in vitro. In addition, further evaluation of the application potential of the micelles was conducted via in vitro MRI.
Results: The diameter of the mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION polymeric micelles was 33.8 ± 5.8 nm on average. Compared with the hydrophilic SPIO, mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles increased transversely (r2), leading to a notably high r2 from 1.908 µg/mL-1S-1 up to 5.032 µg/mL-1S-1, making the mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles a highly sensitive MRI T2 contrast agent, as further demonstrated by in vitro MRI. The results of Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) and Prussian blue staining of Raw264.7 after incubation with micelle-containing medium indicated that the cellular uptake efficiency is high.
Conclusion: We successfully synthesized dual-modal MR and fluorescence imaging mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION polymeric micelles with an ultra-small size and high MRI sensitivity, which were effectively and quickly uptaken into Raw 264.7 cells. mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION polymeric micelles might become a new MR lymphography contrast agent, with high effectiveness and high MRI sensitivity.
Keywords: SPIONs, polymeric micelles, macrophage-targeted, fluorescence imaging, MRI.
Introduction
The early detection and accurate evaluation of benign and malignant lymph nodes are very important for tumor staging and treatment planning. Lymphadenectomy is considered essential in addition to surgical treatment, and lymph node involvement is also a strong prognostic predictor of patient's outcome 1, 2, 3. Although the diagnostic value of this conventional technique is limited, MRI is the most effective diagnostic technique for the detection of lymph node metastases. However, the sensitivity and accuracy are relative low due to the detection criteria of lymph node metastases that mainly depend on insensitive size and morphology 4, 5. As a result, the normal sized metastatic lymph node is often missed, and it is also difficult to distinguish enlarged inflammatory lymph nodes from metastatic lymph nodes 6. Considerable effort has been made to solve these problems in recent years. To date, lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MR imaging for lymph node imaging has been given increased attention, and most of the focus has been on superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) 7, 8. At the same time, polymeric micelles display many advantages, including a small size, a long half-life, and easy passive targeting. Additionally, as an MR contrast agent, we can obtain polymeric micelles with the property of macrophage targeting by controlling the particle size and superparamagnetism by loading SPIO. Furthermore, we can load Nile red into core micelles to establish small-sized, superparamagnetic, dual-modal polymeric micelles, to evaluate the macrophage uptake efficiency of micelles in vitro, and investigate the feasibility of MRI in vitro.
As a blood pool contrast agent, SPIO can improve the sensitivity and soft-tissue contrast 9, 10, 11. In theory, the contrast agent can be administered by two methods in lymph node MR imaging: local injection and intravenous administration. Additionally, the agent particles enter the lymph nodes by two distinct pathways: first, by direct transcapillary passage from high endothelial venules into the medullary sinuses of lymph nodes, followed by engulfment of the particleswithin the lymph nodal parenchyma byphagocytic cells, which is also the major pathway; second, the particles, through nonselective endothelial transcytosis, cross permeable capillaries into the interstitial space, from where the particles drain into the lymph nodes via the lymphatic system; subsequently, the particles are taken up from the interstitium by lymphatic vessels and are transported to regional lymph nodes 12. Thus far, there is scant published literature about intravenous administration, and most of the literature focused on local injection 8, 13. Compared with local injection, intravenous administration has gained increased attention because it enables systemic lymph node imaging, rather than local imaging, by local injection. However, for intravenous administration, the crucial point is that when the diameter of the agent article is great than 40 nm, the agent will be mainly uptaken by the liver and spleen macrophages of the reticuloendothelial system and is rarely absorbed by lymph node macrophages. However, if the size of the agent article is smaller than 40 nm, the situation will be opposite. Based on this situation, in the past several years, lymphotropic nanoparticles loaded with SPIO are a relatively new class of MR contrast agents with unique properties allowing them to be used in a wide variety of clinical applications 7, 14. However, there are few studies concerning such small-sized lymphotropic nanoparticles loaded with SPIO.
This study gives full consideration to the new trend in the development of molecular imaging, using nano biotechnology and molecular imaging. By loading hydrophobic SPIO nanoparticles and Nile red into polymeric micelles assembled from the telodendrimer mPEG-b-dendritic oligo-cholic acid (mPEG-Lys3-CA4), we developed superparamagnetic polymeric micelles with a small size (smaller than 40 nm in diameter) for MR and fluorescent dual-modal imaging to investigate the feasibility of MR imaging and the early detection of occult lymph node metastasis. It is expected to provide a new strategy for the targeted therapy of lymph node metastasis, with great theoretical research significance and clinical potentials.
Materials and Methods
Materials
α-Methoxy-ε-hydroxy-poly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG-OH, Mn = 2 kDa), Di-tert-butoxycar- bonyl-L-lysine (Boc-Lys(Boc)-OH), N-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt), 2-(1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium (HBTU), N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) and anhydrous dimethylformamide (DMF) (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as received. Cholic acid (CA) and trifluoracetic acid (TFA) were purchased from J&K Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Dialysis bags (MWCO: 3.5 kDa, 14 kDa) were purchased from Shanghai Green Bird Technology Development Co., Ltd., China. Chloroform (CHCl3), methanol and diethyl ether were of analytical grade and were purchased from Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory, China. mPEG-NH2 was synthesized as previously reported 15.
Methods
Synthesis of the telodendrimer mPEG-b-dendritic oligo-cholic acid (mPEG-Lys3-CA4)
The biocompatible amphiphilic telodendrimer was synthesized via solution-phase condensation reactions from mPEG2k-NH2 as previously reported 16. First, Boc-Lys(Boc)-OH (1.5 equiv) was coupled onto the N-terminal of PEGusing HBTU (1.5 equiv) and HOBt (1.5 equiv) as coupling reagents in DMF overnight. The completion of the reaction was confirmed by the Kaiser test: a yellow color (no blue color) indicates no remaining amino groups. The targeted molecules were precipitated and washed three times with cold diethyl ether.
Subsequently, the Boc groups were removed by treating with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) at a polymer concentration of 1 g/10 mL. After stirring for 30 min at room temperature, the mixture was precipitated into cold diethyl ether, and the precipitate was filtered, washed with diethyl ether, and vacuum-dried to obtain mPEG-Lys. Afterwards, an additional repeat reaction described above was carried out to generate a second generation of dendritic polylysine on one end of PEG (mPEG-Lys3). Finally, CA molecules (6.0 equiv) were coupled to the N-terminal of PBLA-Lys3 via an amidation reaction with HBTU (6.0 equiv) and HOBt (6.0 equiv) as coupling reagents. The reaction was proceeded in DMF overnight and then was precipitated and washed by cold methanol followed by filtering and vacuum-drying to finally obtain mPEG-Lys3-CA4 (Mn = 3.9 kDa, calculated from the 1H NMR spectrum).
Synthesis of hydrophobic Fe3O4 nanoparticles
The T2contrast of hydrophobic Fe3O4 nanoparticles—that is, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs)—with the diameter of 4-6 nm were synthesized as previously reported 17. Briefly, iron(III) acetylacetonate (2 mmol), 1,2-hexadecanediol (10 mmol), oleic acid (6 mmol) and oleylamine (6 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of benzyl ether in a reaction flask with magnetic stirring under argon. Next, the mixture was heated to 200 ○C, kept for 2 h, and finally refluxed at 300 ○C for an additional 1 h. Subsequently, the black solution was cooled to room temperature under the protection of argon, precipitated into ethanol (200 mL) and then centrifuged (6000 rpm, 3 min) to collect the precipitate. The obtained products were dissolved in 20 mL of hexane, centrifuged (12000 rpm, 6 min) to remove large aggregations, and precipitated into ethanol (200 mL) for another time. Finally, the black-brown nanoparticles were redispersed into hexane and stored at 4 ○C.
Preparation of Nile red/SPIO co-loaded Michelle (mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIONs)
To prepare the SPIONs and Nile red co-loaded micelles, 1 mg of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO), 0.2 mg of Nile red and 20 mg of polymer (PEG-Lys3-CA4) were co-dissolved in 2 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and chloroform (v:v = 1:3). Under sonication (VCX130, Sonics, USA, 20 kHz, 40% power level), the above solution was added dropwise 20 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After the organic solvent chloroform was removed by rotary evaporation, the solution was filtered through a syringe filter (pore size: 450 nm) to eliminate free SPIO, Nile red and large aggregates, followed by ultrafiltration using a MILLIPORE centrifugal filter device (MW cutoff: 100 kDa) to remove DMSO and other hydrophilic impurities. In the meantime, we also prepared Nile red-loaded micelles—that is, mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR micelles—in the same way.
1H NMR spectra measurements
1H NMR spectra were carried out to confirm the synthesis of the designed telodendrimer mPEG-b-dendritic oligo-cholic acid using a Varian Unity 300 MHz spectrometer and CDCl3-d or DMSO-d6 as the solvent at room temperature.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements
The sizes and zeta potentials of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles were measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS). The measurements of the particle size and zeta potential were carried out using90 Plus/BI-MAS equipment (Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, USA) at 25 ºC. Additionally, a standard electrophoresis mini-cell from Brookhaven was used for the measurement of zeta potentials. The data of particle size and zeta potential were collected using an auto-correlator with detection angles of scattered light at 90º and 15º, respectively. For each sample, the data were represented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of five measurements.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements
TEM imaging was obtained at room temperature using a Hitachi model H-7650 TEM operated at 80 kV to determine the morphology characteristics of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles. Samples were prepared by drying a drop (5 μL, 0.5 mg/mL) of the sample solution on a copper grid coated with amorphous carbon, followed by blotting with filter paper after 1 h. For the negative staining of samples, 10 μL of uranyl acetate solution (2 wt% in water) was added to the copper grid; after 1 min, the grid was blotted with a piece of filter paper. The grid was finally dried overnight at room temperature inside a desiccator before TEM observation.
Measurement of SPIO loading and the Nile red content
The iron and Nile red content of the micelles was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry (ASS, Z-200, Hitachi, Japan) and fluorescence spectroscopy (PE-LS55; PerkinElmer Ltd., United Kingdom), respectively. Briefly, before mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIONs were suspended in 1 M HCl solution to allow for polymer degradation and complete dissolution, it was first weighed, and then the iron concentration was determined at a specific Fe-absorption wavelength (248.3 nm) based on a previously established calibration curve. The SPIO loading density was calculated as the ratio of iron oxide over the total weight of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIONs.
T2 relaxivities of Nile red/SPIO-co-loaded micelles and hydrophilic SPIO
Magnetization measurements were performed using a clinical 3.0-T MRI scanner (GE compony Discovery MR750) with an 8 circular head coil at room temperature. Fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted images (T2WI) and T2-mapping were acquired, and T2- mapping was also acquired using single section multi-spin-echo sequences. The detailed acquisition parameters of T2-weighted images were as follows: TR/TE= 5000/111 ms, FOV=100 mm, matrix of256*256, section thickness of2 mm, and region of interest (ROI) of 28 mm2. A ROI was selected in each sample, and the T2 relaxation times were obtained. MR imaging was achieved using Nile red/SPIO co-loaded micelles (mPEG- Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIONs micelles) and hydrophilic SPIO both with different Fe3+ concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 µg/mL. The transversal relaxation times (T2) of the SPIO polymer and hydrophilic SPIO using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as solvent were measured using MRI, and we evaluated the MRI sensitivity as assessed by the measurement of T2 relaxivities. The T2 relaxivities of the SPIO polymer and hydrophilic SPIO were calculated from the slope of the linear plots of the r2 relaxation rates (1/T2) versus Fe concentration. The increase in the r2 relaxation rates (1/T2) with increasing Fe3+ concentration was analyzed by the linear least squares regression analysis.
Cell Preparation
Raw264.7 cells (mouse macrophage cell line) were obtained from Cyagen Bioscience Technology Co. (Guangzhou, China) and were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM; Gibco, New York, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, New York, NY, USA), 1% penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 U/mL). Raw264.7 cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
In vitro cytotoxicity test
The cytotoxicity of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles and mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR micelles was investigated using the methylthiazolyl- diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell proliferation assay. Approximately 10,000 Raw264.7 cells were seeded into each well of the 96-well plates and were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere for 6 h. Next, Raw264.7 cells were incubated for 36 h in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in culture medium supplemented with a series of concentrations of mPEG-Lys3-CA4- NR/SPION micelles and mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR micelles; the final concentrations of iron in the mPEG-Lys3-CA4- NR/SPION micelleswere 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160 µg/mL (the mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION and mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR micelle concentrations were both 0, 108.8, 217.5, 435, 870, 1740, and 3480 µg/mL).Next, MTT reagent (Sigma, 0.5%; 20 µl per well) was added, followed by incubation for 4 h. The medium was discarded, and 150 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well. After shocking for 15 min with a shaking table, the absorbance at 570 nm was recorded using a microplate reader (SpectraMaxM5; Molecular Devices, CA, USA). Cell viability was determined by the following equation: Cell viability (%)¼ (Ni/Nc) 100, where Ni and Nc are the absorbances of surviving cells treated with and without PEG-Lys3-CA4-SPIONs micelles, respectively.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)
Raw264.7 cells were inoculated into Petri dishes at a density of 50,000 cells per dish for 6 h. Next, the medium was discarded, and 2 mL of culture medium was added containing mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles at a Nile red concentration of 1 µg/mL, followed by incubation at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 8 h. Thereafter, the cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then were fixed with 4% glutaraldehyde for approximately 15 min, followed by washing the cells again, and nuclei were stained blue with DAPI (10 µg/mL) for approximately 2 min. The cells for microscopic observation using a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV1000; OLYMPUS, Japan) to identify the micelles inside cells. Nile red was excited at 485 nm with an emission at 595 nm. Images were processed using the IBM Graphics workstation.
Prussian blue staining
Approximately 50,000 Raw264.7 cells were seeded into each well of 6-well plates, and two groups were designed: the time group and concentration group. The time group was incubated for 2 h, 4 h, 6 h and included mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles with an iron concentration of 40 µg/mL; the concentration group was incubated for 6 h and included mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles with some iron concentrations of 10, 20, and 40 µg/mL. For each group, they were all incubated in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in culture medium at 37℃. Subsequently, Raw264.7 cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then were fixed with 4% glutaraldehyde for approximately 15 min. The medium was discarded, and then 2 mL of Prussian blue solution (1% hydrochloride:1% potassium ferrocyanide (II) trihydrate=1:1) was added, followed by incubation for 30 min and washing of the Raw264.7 cells with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The cells were washed three times again with PBS, and iron staining was subsequently observed using an inverted optical microscope.
In vitro MR imaging
For in vitro MR imaging, 5×106Raw264.7 cells were seeded into each well of the 6-well plates. The concentration group was incubated in culture medium that included mPEG-Lys3-CA4- NR/SPION micelles with different iron concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 20, 40 µg/mL for 6 h, and the time group was inoculated in culture medium that included mPEG- Lys3- CA4- NR/SPION micelles with different iron concentrations of 40 µg/mL for 0 h, 0.5 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 8 h. Both groups were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The labeled cells were re-suspended in 500 µl of 0.5% agarose gel (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium) and then were transferred into EP (200 µl) tubes. In vitro MRI measurements were performed using a clinical 3.0 T MRI scanner (GE company Discovery MR750) with an 8 circular head coil at room temperature. Fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted images (T2WI) and T2-mapping were acquired, and T2- mapping also used single section multi-spin-echo sequences. The detailed acquisition parameters of T2-weighted images were as follows: TR/TE=5000/111 ms; FOV=100 mm; Matrix: 256*256; section thickness: 2 mm, ROI= 28 mm2. T2-maps were acquired using the following parameters: TR=5000; TE =6.4、12.8、19.1、25.5、31.9、38.3、44.7、and 51.0 s; Matrix: 256*256; section thickness: 2 mm, ROI= 28 mm2. One ROI was selected in each sample, and the values of T2 relaxation times were obtained.
Statistical Analyses
The T2 relaxivities and viability assay results were compared using unpaired Student t test. One-way analysis of variance was used to calculated the change in the T2 signal. P values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. All calculations were performed using Statistical Product, Service Solutions (SPSS) software (Version 21), GraphPad Prism 6 software and Image-Pro Plus 6.0.
Results and Discussion
Preparation and characterization of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION nanoparticles
The biocompatible amphiphilic telodendrimer (mPEG-Lys3-CA4) was synthesized via solution-phase condensation reactions from mPEG2k-NH2 as previously reported 16 [See: J. T. Luo, K. Xiao, Y. P. Li, J. S. Lee, L. F. Shi, Y. H. Tan, L. Xing, R. H. Cheng, G. Y. Liu, K. S. Lam, Bioconjugate Chem. 2010, 21, 1216-1224]. It was synthesized by multistep chemical reactions as shown in Figure 1. Previous studies have shown that the PEG covering the SPIONs could increase the bio-stability 18.
Figure 2 shows the 1H NMR spectra of (i) mPEG-Lys(Boc)2, (ii mPEG-Lys, (iii) mPEG-Lys3-(Boc)4 and (iv) mPEG-Lys3 in CDCl3. The major resonance peaks of the copolymer in the 1H spectra fit well into the expected chemical structure: 3.38 ppm (s, -OCH3of PEG, a), 3.45-3.76 ppm (m, -CH2CH2Oof PEG, b), 1.47-2.08 ppm (m, -CHCH2CH2CH2CH2NH- of lys, c, d and e), 3.10 ppm (m, -CHCH2CH2CH2CH2NH- of lys, f), 1.42 ppm (s, -CH3 of Boc, g). The presence and absence of characteristic shifts of protons in the Boc group indicated the success of reactions coupling Boc-Lys(Boc)-OH and removing the Boc group, respectively. The grafting efficiency of Boc-Lys(Boc)-OH in mPEG-Lys(Boc)2 and mPEG-Lys3-(Boc)4 were 95% and 89%, respectivelyper the integral area ratio of protons from the Boc group and methylene group in PEG.
Figure 3 indicates that the major CA proton shifts appeared at 0.56, 0.80 and 0.91 ppm, demonstrating the successful synthesis of CA. Figure 4 reveals the GPC curves of mPEG-Lys3 and mPEG-Lys3-CA4 in THF at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The two polymers showed a unimodal molecular weight distribution in their GPC chromatograms, and the final polymer showed an obviously higher molecular weight than the prepolymer, indicating that the CA molecules were coupled onto mPEG-Lys3 successfully.
All results demonstrated that the synthesis of mPEG-Lys3-CA4 was successful, and GPC and 1 H NMR measurements indicated that the copolymers with a desirable molecular weight and polymer dispersity were synthesized via multi-step chemical reactions. The molecular weight and polymer dispersity index (PDI) of mPEG-Lys3 and mPEG-Lys3-CA4 are shown in table 1. The polymer dispersity index of mPEG-Lys3 is 1.04, which is smaller than that of mPEG-Lys3-CA4 (1.07).
Table 1.
Polymer | Mna | Mnb | Mw/Mnb |
---|---|---|---|
mPEG-Lys3 | 2500 | 3100 | 1.04 |
mPEG-Lys3-CA4 | 3900 | 4900 | 1.07 |
a calculated by 1H NMR; b measured by GPC.
The T2 contrast of hydrophobic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with the diameter of 4-6 nm was synthesized as previously reported 17. Briefly, a simple but effective method, the high-temperature decomposition method, was adopted to obtain hydrophobic Fe3O4 nanoparticles, and this method can make them water soluble and biocompatible. Figure 5 describes the telodendrimer mPEG-b-dendritic oligo-cholic acid (mPEG-Lys3-CA4) being introduced to encapsulate the SPIONs and Nile red. The Fe3O4 nanoparticle size was approximately 4-6 nm. Dynamic light scattering was adopted to analyze and determine the diameters of PEG-Lys3-CA4-NR and mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIO micelles, and the results are shown in Figure 6, which shows the size and size distribution of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR micelles and mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIO micelles. The hydrodynamic diameter of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR micelles was 24.2 ± 3.3 nm, which was close to the diameter of blank micelles (21.8 ± 1.9 nm, data not shown in the figure). However, when SPIO was loaded into the micelle, the data came to 33.8 ± 5.8 nm. Since dynamic light scattering measurement provides information about the size of particles, the increase in the particle diameter upon micellar encapsulation apparently could be attributed to the hydrodynamic radius of the polymeric coating on the iron oxide nanoparticles. The hydrodynamic size of nanoparticles in physiological fluids is very important because it is known to significantly affect not only their plasma half-life time but also their biodistribution and pharmacokinetic properties. A previous study noted that the capillary diameter of the reticuloendothelial system is approximately 50 nm 19; in our study, the micelle diameter was smaller than 40 nm, and the small appropriate sizes made the micelles target lymphaden for effective diagnosis. Magnetic nanoparticles for MR signal enhancement must be well defined in structure and size because the size can affect the MR signals. In our research, as shown in Figure 7, transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) observation of both mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR micelles and mPEG-Lys3-CA4- NR/SPIO micelles and the images indicated that both types of micelles were spherically shaped with a uniform size, which was in line with that detected by DLS (Scale bars = 50 nm) and the encapsulation of clustered SPIONs inside the inner aqueous core of the micelles. The loading contents of SPIO and Nile red ofmPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles were 4.4% and 0.9%, respectively, and the zeta potential of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles was -0.01±3.5 as shown in table 2.
Table 2.
micelles | SPIO loading (%) | Nile red loading (%) | Size (nm) | Zata (mV) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIONs | 4.4±0.2 | 0.9±0.1 | 33.8 ± 5.8 | -0.01±3.5 | |
mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR | 24.2±3.3 | 0.11±2.2 | |||
Safety and effectiveness of labeling
The cytotoxicity of the mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles and mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR micelles was further revealed using the MTT cytotoxicity assay in Raw 264.7 cells. As shown in Figure 8, the Nile red-loaded micelles did not show obvious cell growth inhibition even at very high concentrations of micelles, reaching 3,500 µg/mL. When coated with SPION, the cytotoxicity was increased, but the Nile red/SPION co-loaded micelles did not affect the cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells at the highest concentration of 875 µg/mL (the iron concentration was 40 µg/mL), and mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIO micelles negatively affected the Raw 264.7 cell viability at iron concentrations from 40 to 180 µg/mL in a dose-dependent manner—that is, the cytotoxicity will increase with the increase in Fe3+ concentration. Although the cytotoxicity of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles was slightly high, we have indicated that 40 µg/mL is sufficient for magnetic resonance imaging.
The Nile red fluorescence emission spectra for mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles are shown in Figure 9. As the incubation time was from 0.5 h up to 8 h, the imaging indicated that the Nile red/SPIO co-loaded micelles were uptaken into cells, and the absorbed quantity was gradually increased when the incubation time was prolonged: the absorption showed a maximum value when the incubation time was 6 h, and there were no significant changes when the incubated time was 8 h compared with that of 6 h. The results indicated that the incubation time of 6 h was most favorable for cell labeling, and increasing the incubation time did not significantly improve the cellular uptake of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIO micelles. Otherwise, the cells incubated with mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIO micelles showed very strong fluorescence, indicating that the micelles were effectively delivered into the Raw264.7 cells. Prussian blue staining was also performed to evaluate the cellular uptake ability of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPIO micelles. As shown in Figure 10, it was also demonstrated that the micelles were effectively uptaken into the cells, and the absorbed quantity was gradually increased when the incubation time was prolonged and when the iron concentration was increased.
Magnetization and MRI sensitivity of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles
Based on the basic principle of MR imaging, the different content of water hydrogen nuclei in different organizations results in different image contrast along the longitudinal and transverse planes of the applied magnetic field. Consequently, like other MRI contrast agents that can increase the MRI signal intensity by shortening the hydrogen longitudinal relaxation time (T1) or decreasing the signal intensity by shortening the hydrogen transverse relaxation time (T2), as a superparamagnetic contrast agent, SPIO can significantly decrease the signal intensity by shortening the hydrogen transverse relaxation time (T2) and can cause darkening of the interfered regions. A normal lymph node with phagocytic function can take a substantial amount of contrast agent particles and, therefore, significantly reduce the T2 signal intensity of MRI. However, in the metastasis of lymph nodes, the macrophages are decreased due to the normal tissue being replaced by tumor cells 13, 20, 21, the fewer macrophage cells, the less contrast agent uptake, which can therefore result in a decrease that maintains relatively high signal intensity. Based on this fact, our micelles of mPEG- Lys3- CA4- NR/SPIONs can be used to better contrast between the diseased and healthy tissues. In our study, the transverse relaxivities r2 were calculated to determine the effect of the SPIO-polymer (mPEG- Lys3- CA4- NR/SPIONs micelles) and hydrophilic SPIO, reflecting the ability of the SPIO-polymer (mPEG- Lys3- CA4- NR/SPION micelles) and hydrophilic SPIO to alter the T2 of water protons. Additionally, higher r2 leads to better effectiveness of a T2 agent.
As revealed in Figure 11, Figure 11A shows the T2-weighted imaging of mPEG-Lys3- CA4-NR/SPION micelles (SPIO-polymer) and hydrophilic SPIO using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as the solvent at different Fe3+ concentrations as assessed on a 3.0T MRI scanner, and the MRI signal intensity of both was decreased significantly across the entire experiment with Fe3+ concentration ranging from 0 to 4 µg/mL. In other words, the higher the concentration of Fe3+ is, the lower the MRI signal intensity will be. Furthermore, Figure 11B and Figure 11C indicated that, compared with the hydrophilic SPIO, mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles increase transversally(r 2), leading to a notably high r 2 from 1.908 µg/mL-1S-1 up to 5.032 µg/mL-1S-1, making the mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles a highly sensitive MRI T2 contrast agent.
As shown in Figure 12, Figure 12A shows the T2-weighted imaging and T2 map of Raw264.7 cells inoculated with culture medium containing mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles and an Fe3+ concentration of 40 µg/mL for 0, 0.5 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 8 h, and the imaging was assessed on a 3.0T MRI scanner. The T2MI signal intensity was decreased when the incubation time was prolonged, and the T2 value had a minimum value when the incubation time was 6 h (Figure 12B); there were no marked changes when the incubation time was 8 h compared with that of 6 h. The result was consistent with that previously reported. Figure 12C shows the T2 weighted imaging and T2 map of Raw264.7 cells inoculated with culture medium containing mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles with different Fe3+ concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 20, 40 µg/mL for 6 h. The results in Figure 12C and Figure 12D indicated MRI T2 shortening with the increase in Fe3+ concentration. The signal reduction rates were 19.8%, 37.2%, 59.4%, and 77.5% when the Fe3+ concentrations were 5, 10, 20, and 40 µg/mL, respectively, compared with the blank control group.
MRI T2 shortening in the presence of mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION micelles is closely related to several factors such as the Fe3+ concentration inside the core, diameter of the nanoparticles, surface charge, functional groups on the particle surface, and water-accessible surface area. Basically, MRI T2 shortening is associated with the increase in Fe3+ concentration. Additionally, recent reports have demonstrated that the r2 values can be increased by clustering SPIO agents within nanocontainers such as polymeric micelles 22 or liposomes 23. In these cases, whatever the dilution factor applied to the solution, the local Fe3+ concentration is high and maintainable. Particularly, multiple magnetic nanoparticles encapsulated inside the hydrophobic core of one micelle can form a closed packing structure, resulting in much stronger T2 effects than micelles containing a single particle at the same iron concentration 24. However, such a type of micellar encapsulation does not change the local Fe3+ concentration; thus, this may not be the major reason leading to the remarkably increased r2 noted in the present study. Otherwise, when the particle size is decreased to the critical value, the agent changes from a multiple domain state to a single domain state—that is, the magnetic nanoparticle is similar to a giant paramagnetic atom and can respond fast to the external magnetic field, leading to high magnetic sensitivity. In addition, the phenomenon that r2 increases significantly may be explained by the large magnetic field heterogeneity around the nanoparticle through which water molecules diffuse.
To date, although several SPIO-related nanoparticle MRI contrast agents have been reported until now, the development of SPIO-related nanoparticles combined with a super small size and high MRI sensitivity is still receiving much attention. In our study, we have successfully synthesized mPEG-Lys3-CA4 micelles co-loaded with SPIO and Nile red into cores that combined relatively high MRI sensitivity and a super small particle size (less than 35 nm). In a recent study, Qin et al. have reported a highly sensitive T2 contrast agent prepared by coating a single SPIO nanoparticle with Pluronic F127 copolymers 25. However, in theirstudy, the nanoparticle diameter was approximately 70 nm. The major limitation of our study is that the in vivo performance was not tested, and further follow-up of our study will be undertaken using in vivo experiment.
Conclusions
By loading hydrophobic superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) and Nile red into core micelles, we developed mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NR/SPION polymeric micelles with anultra-small size and high MRI sensitivity for MR and fluorescent bimodal lymphography, demonstrating a desirably super small size (<40 nm) and high MRI T2 sensitivity superior to that of hydrophilic SPIO. Our results revealed mPEG-Lys3-CA4-NE/SPIONs with high MRI sensitivity and a super small particle size that are expected to provide a new strategy for the targeted therapy of lymph node metastasis and great theoretical research significance and clinical potentials. Further vivo study will be undertaken in future.
Acknowledgments
This research was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271561) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2015A030313173).
Abbreviations
- MR
magnetic resonance
- MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
- SPIONs
superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
- SPIO
superparamagnetic iron oxide
- CLSM
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
- mPEG
cl-Methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)
- mPEG-Lys3-CA4
mPEG-b-dendritic oligo-cholic acid
- NR
nile red
- TEM
Transmission electron microscopy
- Boc-Lys(Boc)-OH
Di-tert-butoxycarbonyl-L-lysine
- CA
Cholic acid
- NMR
nuclear magnetic resonance
- CDCl3
deuterochloroform
- DMSO
dimethyl sulfoxide
- TEM
Transmission electronic microscopy
- MTT
methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide
- CLSM
Confocal laser scanning microscopy.
References
- 1.Okholm C, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP. Status and prognosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with cardia cancer -A systematic review. Surg Oncol. 2014;23(3):140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mukesh G. Harisinghani, Saksena, Elena Brachtel, et al. MR Lymphangiography: Imaging Strategies to Optimize the Imaging of Lymph Nodes with Ferumoxtran-101.RadioGraphics. 2004;24:867–878. doi: 10.1148/rg.243035190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Quint LE, Bogot NR. Staging esophageal cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2008;8(Suppl A):33–42. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2008.9007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Atula TS, Varpula MJ, Kurki TJ. et al. Assessment of cervical lymph node status in head and neck cancer patients: palpation, computed tomography and low field magnetic resonance imaging compared with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Eur J Radiol. 1997;25:152–161. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(96)01071-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hilton S, Herr HW, Teitcher JB. et al. CT detection of retroperitoneal lymphnode metastases in patients with clinical stage Itesticular nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: assessment of size and distribution criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:521–525. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.2.9242768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Anzai Y, Piccoli CW, Outwater EK. et al. Evaluation of neck and body metastases to nodes with ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR imaging: phase III safety and efficacy study. Radiology. 2003;228:777–788. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2283020872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mansi A. Saksena, Anuradha Saokar, et al. Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MR imaging(LNMRI) technique for lymph node imaging. European Journal of Radiology; 2006. pp. 367–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shiozawa M, Kobayashi S, Sato Y. et al. Magnetic resonance lymphography of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer using superparamagnetic iron oxide: a feasibility study. Breast Cancer. 2014 Jul;21(4):394–401. doi: 10.1007/s12282-012-0401-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu C, Miranda-Nieves D, Ankrum JA. et al. Tracking mesenchymal stem cells with iron oxide nanoparticle loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. Nano Lett. 2012;12:4131–4139. doi: 10.1021/nl301658q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bull E, Madani SY, Sheth R. et al. Stem cell tracking using iron oxide nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:1641–1653. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S48979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Neri M, Maderna C, Cavazzin C. et al. Efficient in vitro labeling of human neural precursor cells with superparama-gnetic iron oxide particles: Relevance for in vivo cell track-ing. Stem Cells. 2008;26:505–516. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weissleder R, Elizondo G, Wittenberg J. et al. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: an intravenous contrast agent for assessing lymph nodes with MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;175:494–498. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Motomura K, Ishitobi M, Komoike Y. et al. SPIO-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of metastases in sentinel nodes localized by computed tomography lymphography in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(12):3422–3429. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1710-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang YX, Hussain SM, Krestin GP. Superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents: physicochemical characteristics and applications in MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:2319–2331. doi: 10.1007/s003300100908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang Y, Xiao H, Fang J. et al. Construction of negatively charged and environment-sensitive nanomedicine for tumor-targeted efficient siRNA delivery. Chem. Commun. 2016;52:1194–1197. doi: 10.1039/c5cc09181k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Luo JT, Xiao K, Li YP. et al. Well-defined, size-tunable, multifunctional micelles for efficient paclitaxel delivery for cancer treatment. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010;21:1216–1224. doi: 10.1021/bc1000033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wen XH, Wang Y, Zhang F. et al. In vivo monitoring of neural stem cells after transplantation in acute cerebral infarction with dual-modal MR imaging and optical imaging. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4627–4635. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Torchilin VP, Papisov MI. Why do poly-ethylene glycol-coated liposomes circulate so long? J Liposome Res. 1994;4(3):725–739. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim DK, Mikhaylova M, Wang FH. et al. Starch-coated super-paramagnetic nanoparticles as MR contrast agents. Chem Mater. 2003;15:4343–4351. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mizokami D, Kosuda S, Tomifuji M. et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography to detect a sentinel lymph node in tongue cancer patients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2013;133(4):418–423. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.744143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ishiyama K, Motoyama S, Tomura N. et al. Visualization of lymphatic basin from the tumor using magnetic resonance lymphography with superparamagnetic iron oxide in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30(2):270–275. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200603000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nasongkla N, Bey E, Ren JM. et al. Multifunctional polymeric micelles as cancer-targeted, MRI-ultrasensitive drug delivery systems. Nano Letters. 2006;6:2427–2430. doi: 10.1021/nl061412u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yuan JJ, Armes SP, Takabayashi Y. et al. Synthesis of biocompatible poly[2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine]-coated magnetite nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2006;22:10989–10993. doi: 10.1021/la061834j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ai H, Flask C, Weinberg B. et al. Magnetite-loaded polymeric micelles as ultrasensitive magnetic-resonance probes. Adv Mater. 2005;17(16):1949–1952. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Qin J, Laurent S, Jo YS. et al. Coating nanocrystals with amphiphilic thermosensitive copolymers. Adv Mater. 2007;19:1874–1874. doi: 10.1002/anie.200900489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]