Abstract
S100A11, a member of S100 calcium-binding protein family, is associated with the numerous processes of tumorigenesis and metastasis. In the present study, the role of S100A11, and its possible underlying mechanisms in cell proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle distribution in human pancreatic cancer were explored. Immunohistochemical analyses of S100A11 and phosphorylated (p)-AKT serine/threonine kinase (AKT) were performed in 30 resected specimens from patients with pancreatic cancer. PANC-1 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-S100A11 or treated with 50 µmol/l LY294002 for 48 h. Cell proliferation was determined using a cell counting kit-8 assay, whereas apoptosis and cell cycle distribution were determined by flow cytometry analysis. The mRNA and protein levels of S100A11, and AKT were determined using semi quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and western blot analyses, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that the expression levels of S100A11 and p-AKT were positively correlated (r, 0.802; P<0.05). Compared with the control group, S100A11 overexpression significantly promoted PANC-1 cell proliferation and reduced the percentage of early apoptotic cells. Flow cytometric analysis indicated that the proportion of PANC-1 cells in the S phase was significantly elevated and cell percentage in the G0/G1 phase declined in response to S100A11 overexpression (all P<0.05). S100A11 overexpression also significantly increased AKT mRNA and p-AKT protein expression levels (both P<0.05). The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, LY294002, significantly inhibited PANC-1 cell proliferation, promoted apoptosis and caused G1/S phase arrest in PANC-1 cells (all P<0.05). These findings together suggest that S100A11 promotes the viability and proliferation of human pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cells through the upregulation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Thus, S100A11 may be considered as a novel drug target for targeted therapy of pancreatic cancer.
Keywords: S100A11, AKT serine/threonine kinase phosphorylation, pancreatic cancer, cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle distribution
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant cancer type with a median survival of 3–6 months and a 5-year survival rate of <5% worldwide (1–4). In 2015, compared with Western countries, the incidence of pancreatic cancer in China increased significantly. In 2010, 34,509 men and 23,226 women succumbed to pancreatic cancer in China (5). Furthermore, in 2015, 62.9% of pancreatic cancer cases are diagnosed at stages I or II, and 37.1% of cases at stages III and IV (6). Chemotherapy is one of the main first-line treatments for advanced pancreatic cancer (7). However, controversy remains regarding its use due to its invasive nature (8). Hence, it is necessary to develop strategies, and identify novel potential pharmacological targets at the molecular level, which are involved in the signaling pathways associated with the occurrence, development and metastasis of pancreatic cancer.
S100A11 is a member of S100 calcium-binding protein family. Interaction of S100A11 with calcium leads to conformational changes of S100A11 protein resulting in the exposure of its hydrophobic region. This region in turn binds to the target protein to transduce the regulated signals of calcium-dependent cells. Thus, S100A11 protein is involved in multiple biological processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, signal transduction, cell adhesion, extracellular matrix remodeling and cell mobility (9–11). At present, it has been demonstrated that S100 protein is associated with the occurrence, development and metastasis of tumors (12). The S100 gene is located in the chromosome region Iq21. Tumor genes in this region are frequently recombined, which may easily cause loss-of-control of S100 gene expression (13). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the expression of S100A11 is upregulated in the early stage of pancreatic cancer and decreases with the progression of pancreatic cancer (13). S100A11 may serve as a significant tumor marker for pancreatic cancer and high expression of S100A11 is an unfavorable predictor for prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection (14–16).
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT serine/threonine kinase (AKT) pathway is involved in the growth, differentiation, and proliferation of somatic and cancer cells (17). Activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway may result in increased tumor cell proliferation and the inhibition of tumor cell apoptosis (17,18). As a key protein in the pathway, AKT serves an important role in regulating cell viability, growth and proliferation (17,18). PI3K is an upstream effector of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, and may induce the activation of AKT through phosphorylating threonine and/or serine residues. PI3K inhibitor LY294002 is able to inhibit AKT phosphorylation (18). It has been reported that the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is significantly active in pancreatic cancer cells (19). Additionally, immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that the phosphorylated (p)-AKT positive rate was 46% in pancreatic cancer tissues, which was significantly higher compared with that in normal pancreatic tissues (17). Therefore, it has been considered that p-AKT is associated with poor prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer (20). In vitro and in vivo experiments have suggested that the blockade of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway significantly impairs the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells, promotes its apoptosis and induces cell cycle arrest (21).
Furthermore, in normal human keratinocytes, AKT phosphorylation is inhibited through downregulation of S100A11 expression in the cells, which leads to a decrease in AKT activity, indicating that S100A11 is involved in AKT activation (22). Therefore, we hypothesized that S100A11 is associated with the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in the occurrence and development of pancreatic cancer. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of S100A11 overexpression on cell proliferation, cell apoptosis and cell cycle distribution in pancreatic cancer cells, and to explore potential mechanisms associated with the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
Materials and methods
Patients and tissue specimens
Pancreatic paraffin samples were provided by the Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (Nantong, China). There were 30 resection specimens from patients with pancreatic cancer hospitalized between January 2010 and June 2013 (male:female, 17:13; median age, 67 years; age range, 41–85 years. The incised margins were all >1 cm. Pathological diagnosis of all the cases was clear, and all the clinicopathological data were complete. None of the patients recruited in the present study had received radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or any other treatment prior to surgery. The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University approved the present study. All patients provided written informed consent for the use of their medical records and tissue specimens for research purposes.
Immunohistochemical analysis
The tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene twice for 5 min at room temperature and then rehydrated using a graded ethanol series (100, 95, 80 and 70%; 5 min at room temperature for each concentration). Subsequently, the endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by soaking in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min at room temperature. Thereafter, the sections were processed in 10 mmol/l citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and were heated to 121°C in an autoclave for 20 min to retrieve the antigen. After being rinsed with PBS (pH 7.2), 10% goat serum (Seebio Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China) was added and incubated at room temperature for 1 h to block the non-specific reactions. The sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse anti-human S100A11 monoclonal antibody (cat. no. WH0006282M1; diluted 1:100; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and rabbit anti-human p-Akt monoclonal antibody (cat. no. 4060; diluted 1:100; Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). Negative control slides were also processed in parallel using a non-specific IgG (cat. no. 18015; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at the same concentration as the primary antibody. All slides were processed using the peroxidase antiperoxidase method (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). After being rinsed with PBS, the peroxidase reaction was visualized by incubating the sections with 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride for 5 min at room temperature. The sections were then rinsed with water, counterstained with hematoxylin for 1 min at room temperature, then dehydrated and coverslipped.
Immunohistochemical evaluation
All of the immunostained sections were evaluated in a blinded manner by three independent experienced observers without any knowledge on the clinicopathological features of the patients. For assessment of S100A11 and p-AKT, five fields (magnification, ×40) in each specimen were selected randomly, and nuclear staining was examined using a light microscope. By counting the number of cells per field of view, the rate of cells expressing S100A11 and p-AKT was calculated; meanwhile, the staining intensity was observed. The positively stained areas were noted as those with light yellow to brown particles, and the specific expression in each case was defined using the staining intensity score and percentage of positively stained cells. The staining intensity scoring (according to the degree of color) was as follows: 0, no staining; 1, pale yellow diffused distribution from cytoplasm to cytoplasmic membrane; 2, brown distribution with fine granular; 3, brown or dark brown distribution with coarse granular from cytoplasm to cytoplasmic membrane as well as nucleus. The percentage of positively stained cells was categorized as follows: 0, <5%; 1, 5–25%; 2, 26–50%; 3, 51–75%; 4, >75%. The score of each patient was calculated as the staining intensity score × positively stained cells score. In 50% of the samples, staining was repeated twice to avoid technical errors, but similar results were obtained in these samples.
Cell culture
The human pancreatic cancer PANC-1, Bxpc-1 and AsPC-1 cell lines were purchased from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were maintained in RPMI-1,640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin mixture (all from Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at 37°C with 5% CO2.
S100A11 overexpression
RNA was extracted from PANC-1 using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA), and cDNA was synthesized via reverse transcription (RT) with the Sensiscript RT kit (Qiagen, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cDNA was used as the template to amplify the S100A11 gene using the S100A11 primers as follows: Forward, 5′-CTCGGATCCGCCACCATGGCAAAAATCTCCAGCCCTACAG-3′ (BamH I) and reverse, 5′-GCCGCTCGAGGGGTCCTCAGGTCCGCTTCTG-3′ (Xhol I). The control gene (β-actin) primers were as follows: Forward, 5′-AAGTACTCCGTGTGGATCGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-ATGCTATCACCTCCCCTGTG-3′. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) theremocycling parameters were as follows: 95°C for 30 sec followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 45 sec and 55°C for 45 sec. The PCR product was run using agarose gel electrophoresis, and was then extracted and purified. The purified DNA and pcDNA3.1/myc-HisA (eukaryotic expression vector, Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) were digested using the restriction enzymes BamH I-HF, Xhol I (both from New England BioLabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). The digested insert (PCR product) and vector (pcDNA3.1/myc-HisA) were ligated using T4 DNA ligase (New England BioLabs, Inc.). Subsequently, the ligation product was transformed into E.coli competent cells and the competent cells were plated onto Luria-Bertani broth (LB) plates. On the second day, the white colonies were picked from the LB plates, followed by plasmid extraction and sequencing. Finally, the plasmid was named as pcDNA3.1-S100A11. Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to transfect PANC-1 cells with 2.5 µg pcDNA3.1-S100A11 and pcDNA3.1 empty vector.
Drug application
PANC-1 cells were seeded into 96-well plates (5×103 cells/well). After 24 h, the medium was removed and replaced with LY294002 (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) dissolved in 50 µmol/l dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) according to a previous protocol (19). The concentration of LY294002 used in experiments was 50 µmol/l, and was incubated with cells for 48 h at 37°C.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation was measured by a commercial Cell Counting kit (CCK)-8 (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan) following the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, PANC-1 cells were seeded onto 96-well cell culture plates at a concentration of 2×104 cells/well in 100 µl culture medium as aforementioned, and were grown overnight. CCK-8 reagent (10 µl) was added to a subset of wells and incubated for 2 h at 37°C and the absorbance reading was taken using an automated plate reader under the detection wavelength of 450 nm.
Cell cycle distribution determined by flow cytometric analysis
For cell cycle analysis, cells were harvested, washed once in PBS, fixed with 70% ethanol at −20°C overnight and then incubated with 1 mg/ml RNase A for 30 min at 37°C. Subsequently, the cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI; 50 µg/ml; BD Biosciences) in PBS-Triton X100 for an additional 20 min at 4°C, and analyzed using the BD FACScan flow cytometer with CellQuest acquisition and analysis programs (FlowJo 10; FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA). Finally, the proportions of cells in the G0/G1, S and G2/M phases were determined.
Cell apoptosis determined by flow cytometric analysis
PANC-1 cell apoptosis was detected using an Annexin V-FITC/PI staining assay. Flow cytometry analysis of apoptotic cells was performed using an Annexin V-FITC/PI staining kit (BD Biosciences). After washing with cold PBS, the cells were resuspended in binding buffer (100 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, and 25 mM CaCl2) followed by staining with Annexin V-FITC/PI at room temperature in the dark for 15 min. Apoptotic cells were then evaluated by gating PI and Annexin V-positive cells on a FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences). Annexin V was set as the horizontal axis and PI was set for the vertical axis. Early apoptotic cells were located in the lower right quadrant of the flow cytometric dot plot.
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA from PANC-1 cells was extracted using a TRIzol extraction kit (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using the ThermoScript RT-PCR system (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The primer sequences were as follows: S100A11 forward, 5′-GAGTCCCTGATTGCTGTCTTC-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGGGTCCTTCTGGTTCTTTG-3′; AKT forward, 5′-GGTATTTTGATGAGGAGTTCACG-3′ and reverse, 5′-GAGTAGGAGAACTGGGGGAAGT-3′; β-actin forward, 5′-AAGTACTCCGTGTGGATCGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-ATGCTATCACCTCCCCTGTG-3′. Thermocycling conditions were as follows: 94°C for 45 sec, 55°C for 45 sec, 72°C for 30 sec for a total of 30 cycles. After amplification, the products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel (cast in the presence of ethidium bromide) and the intensity of the bands was analyzed with Quantity One software (version 4.62; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).
Western blot analysis
PANC-1 cells were lysed in the lysis buffer (1 M Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, 1% Nonidet P-40, 10% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5 M EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and then centrifuged at 4°C, 10,000 × g for 30 min to collect the supernatant. Protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Equal amounts (0.6 mg/lane) of protein were separated with 10% gel using SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidine difluoride filter membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were then blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBS with 0.05% Tween 20 for 2 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the membrane was incubated for 12 h at 4°C with primary antibodies, including anti-S100A11 (1:500; cat. no. WH0006282M1; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), anti-p-AKT (1:500; cat. no. 4060; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), anti-AKT (1:1,000; cat. no. 4685; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and anti-β-actin (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA). Next, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG (1:4,000; anti-mouse IgG, cat. no. 7076; anti-rabbit IgG, cat. no. 7074; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoblotting bands were visualized by chemiluminescence (NEN Life Science Products, Inc., Boston, MA, USA). The band density was measured using a computer-assisted image-analysis system (Image Lab Software 5.2.x; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and was normalized against the β-actin level.
Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM, Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of mean of at least three independent experiments. For statistical analysis, data analysis was performed using a Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance with the Student-Newman-Keuls test. The expression levels of S100A11 and p-AKT in the pancreatic tissues were analyzed using Pearson's correlation analysis. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Correlation between S100A11 and p-AKT expression in human pancreatic paraffin tissue samples
Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that S100A11 was highly expressed in the cytoplasm and to a less extent in the nucleus, while p-AKT was expressed primarily in the cytoplasm with brown yellow or brown staining (Fig. 1A and B). Pearson correlation analysis revealed that the levels of S100A11 and p-AKT were positively correlated (r, 0.802; P<0.05; Fig. 1C) among the 30 cases of pancreatic tissues.
Effects of S100A11 overexpression on cell proliferation, cell apoptosis and cell cycle distribution in PANC-1 cells
To examine the role of S100A11 on the proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle regulation of pancreatic cancer cells, semi-quantitative RT-PCR was used to analyze the expression profile of S100A11 in different pancreatic cancer cell lines including PANC-1, Bxpc-1 and AsPC-1 cells. The results demonstrated that PANC-1 had a relative low expression of endogenous S100A11 among these cell lines (Fig. 2). Accordingly, PANC-1 cell line was chosen for subsequent S100A11 overexpression experiments. Compared with the control group, the expression of S100A11 mRNA and protein in the cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-S100A11 was significantly increased (Fig. 3A and B). Through the CCK-8 experiment, the optical density was measured. Compared with cells transfected with the pcDNA3.1 empty vector, transfection with 2.5 µg pcDNA3.1-S100A11 significantly promoted the proliferation of PANC-1 cells (P<0.05; Fig. 3C). Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis was used to determine the level of apoptotic cell death of control and S100A11-overexpressing PANC-1 cells. The early apoptotic rate (%) in the lower right quadrant of the flow cytometric dot plot in the cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-S100A11 was significantly reduced (1.18±0.12 vs. 5.83±0.30% in the control; P<0.05; Fig. 3D). To further explore the involvement of S100A11 in the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells, the cell cycle distribution of control and S100A11-overexpressing PANC-1 cells was detected (Fig. 3E). The proportion of cells in G0/G1 phase in pcDNA3.1-S100A11 and pcDNA3.1 groups was 68.81±5.42, and 78.68±6.21%, respectively (P<0.05), while the proportion of cells in the S phase was 20.48±2.37 and 10.81±2.65%, respectively (P<0.05).
Effects of S100A11 overexpression on AKT mRNA expression, p-AKT and total AKT protein expression in PANC-1 cells
To further investigate the association between S100A11 and AKT, the mRNA and protein expression levels of AKT were analyzed. Compared with the empty vector group, AKT mRNA expression was significantly higher in the pcDNA3.1-S100A11 group (Fig. 4A; P<0.05). In addition, the protein levels of p-AKT and total AKT were significantly higher in the S100A11 overexpression group (Fig. 4B; P<0.05).
Effects of PI3K inhibitor LY294002
LY294002 significantly inhibited the AKT mRNA expression and p-AKT protein expression when compared with the corresponding negative controls (Fig. 5A and B; P<0.05). However, no significant differences were noted in the mRNA of S100A11, and protein expression levels of S100A11 and total AKT (Fig. 5A and B). PANC-1 cells were treated with 50 µmol/l of LY294002 for 12, 24, 48 and 72 h, followed by CCK-8 analysis. It was demonstrated that LY294002 treatment resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability from 86.2% at 12 h to 37.4% at 72 h (Fig. 5C). As LY294002 treatment inhibited cell viability, the effect of LY294002 on PANC-1 cell apoptosis and cell cycle distribution was further examined. The proportion of early apoptotic cells was 21.36±2.34% in the lower right quadrant of the scatter plot in the LY294002 group, which was significantly higher compared with the proportion of early apoptotic cells in the control group (1.18±0.12%; P<0.05; Fig. 5D). Compared with the control group, LY294002 treatment led to an increase of cells in the G0/G1 phase from 70.62±4.21 to 81.51±4.33%, while the proportion of cells in the S phase significantly decreased from 8.75±2.13 to 3.61±2.05% (both P<0.05; Fig. 5E).
Discussion
S100A11 is widely expressed in multiple tissues and exists as a noncovalent homodimer with an anti-parallel conformation. The binding of Ca2+ triggers conformational changes of S100A11, which facilitates its interaction with target proteins. S100A11 has been reported to be overexpressed in numerous different types of human cancer, including renal cell carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma (23–26). Our previous study revealed that S100A11 serves an important role in the development and prognosis of pancreatic cancer (15). However, the exact role of S100A11 in the pancreatic cancer remained unknown. In order to investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the tumor-promoting role of S100A11 in the occurrence and development of pancreatic cancer, an in vitro model of S100A11 overexpression in pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cells was successfully constructed. High expression levels of S100A11 are able to regulate cell cycle progression and the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells (12,14). The results of the present study revealed that the overexpression of S100A11 significantly promoted human pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cell proliferation, reduced the percentage of early apoptotic cells, and enhanced the G1/S phase transition of pancreatic cancer cells. These results were consistent with previous studies of ovarian and lung tumors (27,28).
The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway serves an important function in the development of pancreatic cancer (19–21). However, it remains unclear whether the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway participated in the action of S100A11 in pancreatic cancer. Firstly, immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the correlation between S100A11 and p-AKT, which suggested a positive correlation between of S100A11 and p-AKT expression in the pancreatic cancer tissues of 30 cases. Furthermore, using an in vitro cell model, it was demonstrated that the overexpression of S100A11 significantly increased AKT mRNA expression, and total AKT and p-AKT protein expression. In order to further investigate the association between S100A11 and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer, PANC-1 cells were treated with LY294002, a specific inhibitor of PI3K. Through the specific inhibition of PI3 catalytic activity, LY294002 treatment leads to the dephosphorylation of downstream AKT at T308 and S473 residues (29). It has been acknowledged that the dephosphorylation of AKT inhibits cell growth and induces cell apoptosis. In the current study, LY294002 was employed to inhibit the phosphorylation of AKT, thereby specifically inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway. The results from the present study revealed that LY294002 treatment significantly inhibited cell proliferation, and promoted cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase in PANC-1 cells. These results were supported by previous studies in human keratinocyte cells, which reported that the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is involved in S100A11-triggered signal transduction (22,30). Of note, it was demonstrated that treatment with LY294002 significantly attenuated AKT mRNA expression and the protein expression of p-AKT. However, the mRNA of S100A11, and protein expression levels of S100A11 and total AKT were not affected. Through AKT is rapidly activated through protein phosphorylation, certain studies have also documented that increased levels of total AKT is a hallmark of tumor cells (31–33). The mRNA and protein levels of AKT are regulated by complex mechanisms, and involve numerous signaling molecules, including glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β, Twist, microRNA (miR)-185 and miR-203 (34–37). Therefore, we hypothesized that LY294002 may regulate the activities of these molecules, particularly GSK-3β, which is a well-known AKT substrate, thus exerting an influence on AKT mRNA expression, but not on the total AKT protein expression. However, the potential mechanism underlying this effect remains elusive and warrants further investigation.
To conclude, the results of the current study demonstrated that S100A11 promoted human pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cell proliferation through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. LY294002 was able to significantly inhibit the proliferation of PANC-1 cells, and induce apoptosis through the PI3K/AKT pathway without affecting the expression of S100A11 mRNA and protein levels, suggesting that existence of S100A11 activity upstream of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. However, the specific mechanism regarding the role of S100A11 in the development of pancreatic cancer requires further studies. S100A11 may serve as a potentially effective target in pancreatic cancer therapy.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by grants from the Natural Youth Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81502055), The Health Project of Jiangsu Province (grant no. H201624), The Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK20161286) and The Social Development Foundation of Nantong City (grant nos. MS22016056, MS22015062, HS2014072 and MS22015044).
References
- 1.Ryan DP, Hong TS, Bardeesy N. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1039–1049. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1404198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zell JA, Rhee JM, Ziogas A, Lipkin SM, Anton-Culver H. Race, socioeconomic status, treatment and survival time among pancreatic cancer cases in California. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:546–552. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lau MK, Davila JA, Shaib YH. Incidence and survival of pancreatic head and body and tail cancers: A population-based study in the United States. Pancreas. 2010;39:458–462. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181bd6489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Quaresma M, Coleman MP, Rachet B. 40-year trends in an index of survival for all cancers combined and survival adjusted for age and sex for each cancer in England and Wales, 1971–2011: A population-based study. Lancet. 2015;385:1206–1218. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61396-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lin QJ, Yang F, Jin C, Fu DL. Current status and progress of pancreatic cancer in China. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:7988–8003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.7988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yu J, Blackford AL, Dal Molin M, Wolfgang CL, Goggins M. Time to progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from low-to-high tumour stages. Gut. 2015;64:1783–1789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Polyak K, Lee MH, Erdjument-Bromage H, Koff A, Roberts JM, Tempst P, Massagué J. Cloning of p27Kip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and a potential mediator of extracellular antimitogenic signals. Cell. 1994;78:59–66. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90572-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yang F, Di Y, Li J, Wang XY, Yao L, Hao SJ, Jiang YJ, Jin C, Fu DL. Accuracy of routine multidetector computed tomography to identify arterial variants in patients scheduled for pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:969–976. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Arumugam T, Logsdon CD. S100P: A novel therapeutic target for cancer. Amino Acids. 2011;41:893–899. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0496-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hung KW, Chang YM, Yu C. Resonance assignments of Ca2+-bound human S100A11. Biomol NMR Assign. 2013;7:211–214. doi: 10.1007/s12104-012-9412-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sakaguchi M, Huh NH. S100A11, a dual growth regulator of epidermal keratinocytes. Amino Acids. 2011;41:797–807. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0747-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ji YF, Huang H, Jiang F, Ni RZ, Xiao MB. S100 family signaling network and related proteins in pancreatic cancer (Review) Int J Mol Med. 2014;33:769–776. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ohuchida K, Mizumoto K, Ohhashi S, Yamaguchi H, Konomi H, Nagai E, Yamaguchi K, Tsuneyoshi M, Tanaka M. S100A11, A putative tumor suppressor gene, is overexpressed in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5417–5422. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen H, Xu C, Jin Q, Liu Z. S100 protein family in human cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2014;4:89–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xiao MB, Jiang F, Ni WK, Chen BY, Lu CH, Li XY, Ni RZ. High expression of S100A11 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an unfavorable prognostic marker. Med Oncol. 2012;29:1886–1891. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-0058-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Donato R, Cannon BR, Sorci G, Riuzzi F, Hsu K, Weber DJ, Geczy CL. Functions of S100 proteins. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13:24–57. doi: 10.2174/1566524011307010024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yamamoto S, Tomita Y, Hoshida Y, Morooka T, Nagano H, Dono K, Umeshita K, Sakon M, Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, et al. Prognostic significance of activated Akt expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2846–2850. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-02-1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jiang H, Fan D, Zhou G, Li X, Deng H. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor (LY294002) induces apoptosis of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:34. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Asano T, Yao Y, Zhu J, Li D, Abbruzzese JL, Reddy SA. The PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway is activated due to aberrant Pten expression and targets transcription factors NF-kappaB and c-Myc in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:8571–8580. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chadha KS, Khoury T, Yu J, Black JD, Gibbs JF, Kuvshinoff BW, Tan D, Brattain MG, Javle MM. Activated Akt and Erk expression and survival after surgery in pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:933–939. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Roy SK, Srivastava RK, Shankar S. Inhibition of PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways causes activation of FOXO transcription factor, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer. J Mol Signal. 2010;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1750-2187-5-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sakaguchi M, Sonegawa H, Murata H, Kitazoe M, Futami J, Kataoka K, Yamada H, Huh NH. S100A11, an dual mediator for growth regulation of human keratinocytes. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:78–85. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-07-0682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gabril M, Girgis H, Scorilas A, Rotondo F, Wala S, Bjarnason GA, Ding Q, Evans A, Tawedrous E, Pasic M, et al. S100A11 is a potential prognostic marker for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016;33:63–71. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9758-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Woo T, Okudela K, Mitsui H, Tajiri M, Rino Y, Ohashi K, Masuda M. Up-regulation of S100A11 in lung adenocarcinoma-its potential relationship with cancer progression. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Anania MC, Miranda C, Vizioli MG, Mazzoni M, Cleris L, Pagliardini S, Manenti G, Borrello MG, Pierotti MA, Greco A. S100A11 overexpression contributes to the malignant phenotype of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:E1591–E1600. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang G, Wang X, Wang S, Song H, Sun H, Yuan W, Cao B, Bai J, Fu S. Colorectal cancer progression correlates with upregulation of S100A11 expression in tumor tissues. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:675–682. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0464-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu Y, Han X, Gao B. Knockdown of S100A11 expression suppresses ovarian cancer cell growth and invasion. Exp Ther Med. 2015;9:1460–1464. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hao J, Wang K, Yue Y, Tian T, Xu A, Hao J, Xiao X, He D. Selective expression of S100A11 in lung cancer and its role in regulating proliferation of adenocarcinomas cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;359:323–332. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-1026-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gong C, Liao H, Wang J, Lin Y, Qi J, Qin L, Tian LQ, Guo FJ. LY294002 induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of cancer stem-like cells from human osteosarcoma via down-regulation of PI3K activity. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:3103–3107. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.7.3103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Foertsch F, Teichmann N, Kob R, Hentschel J, Laubscher U, Melle C. S100A11 is involved in the regulation of the stability of cell cycle regulator p21 (CIP1/WAF1) in human keratinocyte HaCaT cells. FEBS J. 2013;280:3840–3853. doi: 10.1111/febs.12378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vara JA Fresno, Casado E, de Castro J, Cejas P, Belda-Iniesta C, Gonzalez-Baron M. PI3K/Akt signalling pathway and cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30:193–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2003.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vivanco I, Sawyers CL. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:489–501. doi: 10.1038/nrc839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Le Page C, Koumakpayi IH, Alam-Fahmy M, Mes-Masson AM, Saad F. Expression and localisation of Akt-1, Akt-2 and Akt-3 correlate with clinical outcome of prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1906–1912. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nemoto T, Kanai T, Yanagita T, Satoh S, Maruta T, Yoshikawa N, Kobayashi H, Wada A. Regulation of Akt mRNA and protein levels by glycogen synthase kinase-3beta in adrenal chromaffin cells: Effects of LiCl and SB216763. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;586:82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.02.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tsitoura E, Wells AU, Karagiannis K, Lasithiotaki I, Vasarmidi E, Bibaki E, Koutoulaki C, Sato H, Spandidos DA, Siafakas NM, et al. MiR-185/AKT and miR-29a/Collagen 1a pathways are activated in IPF BAL cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:74569–74581. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li J, Chen Y, Zhao J, Kong F, Zhang Y. miR-203 reverses chemoresistance in p53-mutated colon cancer cells through downregulation of Akt2 expression. Cancer Lett. 2011;304:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cheng GZ, Chan J, Wang Q, Zhang W, Sun CD, Wang LH. Twist transcriptionally up-regulates AKT2 in breast cancer cells leading to increased migration, invasion and resistance to paclitaxel. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1979–1987. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]