Narrative medicine to improve the management and quality of life of patients with COPD: the first experience applying parallel chart in Italy

Abstract

Purpose

Poor adherence to therapy and the failure of current smoking cessation programs demonstrate that the current management of COPD can be improved, and it is necessary to educate physicians about new approaches for taking care of patients. Parallel chart is a narrative medicine tool that improves the doctor–patient relationship by asking physicians to write about their patients’ lives, thereby encouraging reflective thoughts on care.

Patients and methods

Between October 2015 and March 2016, 50 Italian pulmonologists were involved in the collection of parallel charts of anonymous patients with COPD. The narratives were analyzed according to the Grounded Theory methodology.

Results

In the 243 parallel charts collected, the patients (mean age 69 years, 68% men) are described as still active and as a resource for their families (71%). The doctor–patient relationship started as difficult in 50% of cases, and younger age and smoking were the main risk factors. The conversations turned positive in 78% of narratives, displaying deeper mutual knowledge, trust for the clinicians’ ability to establish effective therapy (92%), support efforts to quit smoking (63%), or restore patients’ activities (78%).

Conclusion

All the physicians concurred that the adoption of innovative parallel charts was useful for improving clinical care and worthy of official inclusion in protocols for the management of COPD.

Introduction

Disease characteristics and implications

COPD is a preventable and treatable chronic respiratory disease associated with several systemic effects and comorbidities that may contribute to its severity.¹ COPD was the fourth leading cause of death worldwide in 2000, and figures suggest it will become the third leading cause by 2020.²

The primary symptom of COPD is dyspnea, or breathlessness, which is perceived by patients as distressing, frightening, and often has a negative influence on quality of life and physical activity.^3,4 Studies suggest that COPD is perceived by patients as a disability⁵ and “not as a disease but as a health problem” related to lifestyle, and this perception has a negative impact on adherence to treatment.⁶

While a definitive cure for COPD does not yet exist, the disease can be adequately controlled through therapy and smoking cessation, especially if diagnosed in the early stages. However, adherence to treatment is extremely low, with rates of <50% in Europe and America, and this has detrimental effects on patients’ quality of life and disease progression.^7–9 In economic terms, valuable National Health Service resources are wasted due to the increased rate of relapses, hospitalizations, and related costs.¹⁰

Several studies have demonstrated the positive effects of a strong doctor–patient relationship and the benefits of good communication for patients’ compliance with treatment.^11–14 Such communication can help physicians overcome harmful patient preconceptions, beliefs, and low disease literacy that underlie resistance to treatment.¹⁵ The effectiveness of treatment is also influenced by patients’ beliefs and choices regarding smoking.^16,17 Literature shows that, despite contemporary antismoking strategies, 80% of patients relapse after 1 year.^18,19 The only effective solution to prevent relapse seems to be support through counseling.^19,20 In conclusion, the current management of COPD can be improved and it is necessary to educate physicians about new ways to manage their patients.²¹

Narrative medicine: a novel approach for gaining insight

Narrative medicine is a broad-spectrum approach for addressing the emotional and sociological aspects of persons affected by disease, and other stakeholders involved (health care professionals, caregivers, and family members). It originates in an analysis of the doctor–patient relationship through the evaluation of narratives collected from the parties involved.²² This practice aims to gain insight and provide an understanding of how a person lives with his/her illness, considering the many facets of the patient’s care.²³ In service of this goal, narrative medicine relies on the use of several narration tools: one of such tools conceived specifically for collecting physician feedback and narration is the “parallel chart”. The parallel chart was first implemented in daily practice by Charon,²⁴ and it is conceived as a space in which clinicians can collect their impressions in plain language as a supplement to the extremely technical and quantitative medical reports.^24,25 The parallel chart facilitates reappraisal of the paradigm of patient care, expanding the physician’s focus beyond clinical data to envision the person as a whole.^26,27 The parallel chart is intended to be a private document where professionals can freely express their feelings toward patients, and they have the right to decide if they want to share their narration and with whom.²⁴

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the doctor–patient relationship and its impact on patient life and care alliance. The second objective was to highlight the spheres of illness and sickness of COPD according to the perception of physicians. More broadly, this study aimed to gain knowledge of how to improve the quality of care through the use of parallel charts.

Methods

Participants and study design

From November 2015 to March 2016, 50 Italian pulmonologists participated in the study. Each physician was invited to attend a seminar on narrative medicine, and then write at least five parallel charts. The parallel chart included prompts that followed a semi-structured narrative plot representing a chronological series of events; prompts were included to help the clinicians overcome writer’s block²⁸ (Box 1). The parallel chart was created by a dedicated board composed of pulmonologists and experts in narrative medicine, particularly in research, who were also involved in the interpretation of the results.²⁹ Clinicians had the choice to write the parallel chart with or without the prompts, but, to be eligible for the study, the personalized chart had to deal with 1) a relationship of the physician with a COPD patient who he/she had worked with for at least 6 months and 2) a patient who he/she has seen at least twice. Pulmonologists wrote the parallel chart after at least two visits and they could choose to write it immediately after the visit or later in the privacy of their own homes, which offered more time to write and reflect. There was no maximum or minimum length required for the narratives.

Narratives were collected through the Typeform online survey platform³⁰ and at the end of the survey period, raw and anonymous data were downloaded as a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. All data were self-reported and submitted anonymously. All narratives and instruments were written in Italian; the authors did the translation of the plot and the narratives extracts within the boxes and the translation company T&t SAS di Tina Attubato revised it.

All pulmonologists informed their general managers about the study, signed the informed consent, and submitted anonymous data on their patients. The research was managed in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Fondazione Don Gnocchi did not express an opinion because it considered our work as a consensus meeting report.

Box 1. The semi-structured plot suggested for writing the parallel chart.

The first encounter with the patient was […] The patient seemed […] and he/she told me […] So I had […]. During the communication of the diagnosis I think the patient felt […] and so I felt […] I thought […] and I had […]

During the following visits […] The patient told me that at home […] Inside the family […] And outside […] His/her activities […] I thought […] And I had […] I felt […]

Today, taking care of this person is […] From the patient I’m learning that […] For the future I wish […] For the future, I hope that he/she […] Thanks for your time, energy, and thoughts. A last question: how did you feel about writing the parallel chart? […]

Population size, data, and text analysis

Sociodemographic variables were analyzed with descriptive statistics (mean, ranges, and classes), and frequencies were reported as percentages.

Narratives, written in the local language (Italian), were analyzed using the Grounded Theory approach³¹ for qualitative interpretation of texts. In order to reduce bias in their interpretation, analyses were conducted via triple-blind reading through three independent research phases.³² The first reading allowed us to define the cluster and the nodes for coding. The second reading was carried out with a specific qualitative data software program (QSR NVivo 10; QSR International, Melbourne, Australia), which enables thorough textual analysis of recurring words and semantic expressions, facilitating analyses of large volumes of narrative data.^33,34

In addition to the Grounded Theory approach, a thematic analysis was carried out in accordance with the disease classification by the anthropologist Arthur Kleinman.³⁵ Based on his definitions, three clusters of narratives were identified as follows:³⁶

• “disease-centered” narratives – focused on the clinical and mechanistic point of view, with technical language and dry text which is not open to emotional considerations;

• “illness-centered” narratives – focused on living with a particular condition, with open language and narration that flows from an emotional, familiar, and social point of view;

• “sickness-centered” narratives – focusing on the external and publically visible aspects of living unhealthily.

This method, based on the Grounded Theory and classic narrative medicine classifications, has been used previously.^28,36

Results

Physicians’ profile

The study involved 50 Italian pulmonologists who wrote up a mean of 4.88 parallel charts each, for a total of 244 narratives on 244 people living with COPD, of which only one was excluded from the analysis because it was not intelligible. Clinicians spent, on average, 27 minutes writing one parallel chart. The sample of physicians consisted of 58% men, with a mean age of 50 years, which is representative of the population of Italian physicians.³⁷ The study participants mainly came from the public health care sector, 76% specialized in respiratory diseases, 12% in internal medicine, and 12% in other disciplines; 68% had chosen their specialization because of their passion for the area (Table 1).

Table 1.

Personal details and profile of the 50 physicians involved in the study

Physician characteristics	Physician (N=50)
Women, % (n)	42 (21)
Men, % (n)	58 (29)
Mean age	50 (min: 34, max: 65)
Professional years	17 (min: 1, max: 35)
Region of origin, % (n)
Northern Italy	40 (20)
Central Italy	24 (12)
Southern Italy	36 (18)
Work setting, % (n)
Working in a hospital	50 (25)
Working in a local public health care facility	38 (19)
Working in a private clinic	8 (4)
Working as private practitioner	4 (2)
Specialization, % (n)
Respiratory diseases	76 (38)
Internal medicine	12 (6)
Others	12 (6)
Reason for choosing this specialization, % (n)
Passion	68 (34)
Direct experience	14 (7)
Opportunity	12 (6)
Random	6 (3)

The profile of the patients described by physicians

The patients described in the parallel charts by participating physicians were mainly males (68%) with a mean age of 69 years (Table 2). Among them, 70% were married and only 14% of the narratives were about patients with no offspring, which is consistent with the statistics from the Italian Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) for this age group.³⁸ Physicians described mainly patients with a high level of education, which instead is not consistent with the ISTAT data for this age group.³⁸ Twenty-four percent of patients still worked or were self-employed, and 49% of them were smokers or ex-smokers.

Table 2.

Personal details and profile of the 243 patients described in the parallel charts

Patients’ characteristics	Patients (N=243), % (n)
Women	32 (78)
Men	68 (167)
Age
<54	7 (17)
55–64	22 (54)
65–74	38 (92)
75–84	26 (63)
≥85	7 (17)
Marital status
Married	70 (140)
Widow/widower	15 (30)
Single	9 (18)
Divorced	6 (13)
Family status
Children and grandchildren	57 (138)
Children	22 (53)
Nephews/nieces	7 (17)
No children or nephews/nieces	14 (34)
Education
Primary school	18 (43)
Junior high school	28 (68)
High school	37 (90)
Bachelor’s/Master’s	17 (41)
Employment status
Employed	12 (29)
Self-employed	12 (29)
Retired	64 (155)
Not working	12 (30)
Smoking habits
Nonsmoker	51 (124)
Ex-smoker	10 (24)
Smoker at the first visit	39 (95)

Patients mainly represented the second, third, and fourth stages of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease functional classification system.¹⁷ They had lived with COPD for an average of 9 years, but pulmonologists had been treating them for an average of 4 years, since ~50% of them were previously treated at other centers (Table 3).

Table 3.

Onset of COPD and staging according to the functional classification of GOLD

Characteristics of the disease	Patients (N=211)
Mean age at diagnosis	61 (min: 18, max: 85)
Years living with COPD	9 (min: 0, max: 36)
Years treated by the current physician	3.8 (min: 0, max: 20)
Gold I, % (n)	3 (6)
Gold II, % (n)	32 (68)
Gold III, % (n)	37 (78)
Gold IV, % (n)	28 (59)

Abbreviation: GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.

The language of parallel charts

Analyzing the parallel charts in their entirety, the themes can be classified as illness-centered in 71% of the narratives, 18% describe only the disease, while 11% of the narratives present an integration of the two aspects. Sickness is present together with illness in 22% of the parallel charts and is mainly cited in reference to the issue of smoking and the use of oxygen therapy (Table 4).

Table 4.

Classification of the parallel charts among disease, illness, and sickness

Parallel charts (N=241)	Illness	Illness and disease	Disease	Sickness
Whole narrative, % (n)	71 (171)	11 (26)	18 (43)	22 (53)
Top 100 words used for the description of the first encounter, %	43	NA	57	NA
Top 100 words used for the description of the relationship today, %	69	NA	31	NA

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

By analyzing the 100 most frequently used words in the entire text of the 243 parallel charts, however, the terminology used belonged primarily to the sphere of the disease. By analyzing the 100 most frequently used words in the part of the narratives referring to the present relationship, in only 31% of cases pulmonologists used terms associated with the sphere of the disease, a significant decrease compared to those used for the description of the first encounter (57%).

Relationships with patients

From the parallel charts, 80% of physicians actively listened to patients while trying to understand the needs of the person, while 20% stereotyped their patients (Table 5).

Table 5.

Classification of the type of relationship established by physicians

Type of relationship	Doctor–patient relationship (N=243), % (n)
Stereotyping	20 (49)
Active listening	80 (194)

In 51% of the narratives, doctors described patients with whom the relationship had been easy from the first meeting, while for the remaining 49% the first visit was difficult. Throughout the duration of care, 26% of difficult relationships evolved into relationships based on trust and respect between the pulmonologist and the patient with COPD (Table 6). From the analysis of the narratives (explained in the “Age” and “Smoking” sections), the factors influencing the relationship were mainly the patients’ smoking habits and age, while the quality of relationship impacted adherence and effectiveness of therapies, as well as the resumption of activities.

Table 6.

Relations with people with COPD “today” in the narratives, analyzed according to the age at diagnosis and their smoking habits

Patients’ characteristics	Easy, % (n)	Evolving from difficult to easy, % (n)	Remained difficult, % (n)
Overall narratives	51 (124)	26 (63)	23 (54)
Patient age at diagnosis
<45	22 (2)	44 (4)	33 (3)
45–54	40 (19)	26 (12)	34 (16)
55–64	49 (38)	21 (16)	31 (24)
65–74	62 (34)	27 (15)	11 (6)
75–85	80 (12)	20 (3)	–
Smoking habits
Smoker	15 (5)	12 (4)	74 (25)
Nonsmoker or ex-smoker	62 (90)	24 (35)	14 (20)
Stopped smoking after the first visit	47 (29)	39 (24)	15 (9)

In terms of the language used by physicians, the parallel charts in which the doctor–patient relationship is described as evolving from difficult to easy contained both disease and illness-centered elements (Table 7). This blended language was not only more effective than the use of the disease-only terminology, but it also seemed to be more effective in being able to overcome a difficult relationship than the use of only the illness-centered style.

Table 7.

Evolution of relationships (from difficult to easy, or difficult throughout), stratified by language classifications and by physician age

Characteristics related to physicians	Evolving from difficult to easy, % (n)	Remained difficult, % (n)
Language
Disease	33 (6)	67 (12)
Disease and illness	69 (11)	31 (5)
Illness	55 (46)	45 (37)
Physicians’ age
<40	33 (8)	67 (16)
40–50	58 (19)	42 (14)
>50	60 (36)	40 (24)

The doctor–patient relationship was not influenced by gender. The ability to change a difficult relationship into a positive one was less common in physicians under 40, who referred more to disease terminology (Table 7).

Age

Upon communication of the diagnosis of COPD, we observed a correlation between the patients’ age and the evolution of the relationship: the beginning of the process was easier for older patients, whereas the percentage of relationships starting in a difficult manner increased with decreasing age (reaching 77% when people were <45 at the time of diagnosis; Table 6). From the analysis of the narratives, it appears that physicians faced more resistance in achieving acceptance of the disease from younger patients.

Smoking

From the analysis of the 92 parallel charts related to patients who were smokers, only 28% of health care professionals used an empathetic approach to encourage smoking cessation or refer patients to rehabilitation in antismoking centers. In 72% of cases, however, pulmonologists made use of threats, which were effective for 35% of patients and ineffective for the remaining 37%. A total of 63% of patients stopped smoking while in care with the reporting physician (Box 2).

The type of doctor–patient relationship is strictly linked to the success in smoking cessation: the group of smokers who continued smoking despite the diagnosis of COPD had a difficult relationship with their pulmonologist in 74% of cases. The failure of the patients’ smoking cessation led physicians to feel more distressed and irritated by such patients (Table 6).

Smoking was closely linked to the sphere of sickness, because patients were often described as being perceived as the “cause of their own disease” by both physicians and society: 66% of sickness narratives were related to patient smokers. The relationships that began with difficulties and anger led pulmonologists to not be willing to accept and understand the person they took care of, nor did it foster an effective path toward the containment or termination of the smoking addiction.

Box 2. Example of extracts randomly selected by the researcher from the pool of parallel charts describing the smoking situation.

Smoking (empathetic help) 28%	Smoking (functional threat) 35%
“We talked a lot about what cigarettes meant to him and especially the possible fear of having to quit because of health problems – which were becoming important.” “I’ve prescribed him the same therapy but have changed the trade name of the drug and, instead of imposing the care in an authoritarian manner, I tried to use a more friendly and reassuring approach, which eventually led him to promise a reduction of cigarettes to 10 per day.”	“I suggest the patient have periodic checkups but above all to hold to the intention of abstaining from smoking.” The answer: “Doctor I’m sure, after hearing what you told me, ie, that you do not assist smokers, I would not have had the courage to come return to visit, now or never.” “Several times in my life as a doctor, I thought back to that moment: I do not know if it was me being very convincing, or if he was ready and he just needed a confirmation of what he already knew, that smoke had ruined his lungs.”
Smoking (nonfunctional threat) 37%
“Are you still smoking!? Don’t you understand that if you keep doing like this, you’ll die next time? And who will take care of your granddaughter?” I said, sounding a bit threatening. “What should I tell you Doctor? I can’t … I enjoy smoking too much to quit!! And then … among my bridge companions there is one who smokes more than me and is 79 years old! So … why should everything come upon me?” “For him smoking was unavoidable, he was not going to stop and explaining to him what could be the consequences of this choice served no purpose. He knew it very well and really did not care!”

Pharmacological treatments

Reference to therapy was present in most parallel charts (85%), while rehabilitation and respiratory physiotherapy were scarcely mentioned (only 10% of charts). Efficacy of therapies was described in 73% of the narratives, 92% with a positive outcome (Box 3).

However, when the relationship was difficult, therapy was revealed to be ineffective or did not lead to an improvement perceived by patients in 44% of cases (Figure 1). Forty-nine percent of the narratives mentioning therapy focused on adherence to treatment. On average, 80% of cases of adherence to treatment were mentioned, although this percentage varied depending on the quality of the doctor–patient relationship. When relationships were positive, all the patients achieved a “therapeutic alliance,” while in cases of difficult relationships, 74% of patients did not comply with their prescriptions, mainly using drugs on an “as needed” basis.

Figure 1.

Effectiveness of therapies (on the left) and adherence to treatment (on the right) as reported within the narratives according to the difficulty of the relationship.

Box 3. Example of extracts randomly selected by the researcher from the pool of parallel charts describing the therapies.

Therapies

“The new association, would have allowed the bronchodilatation of the battered survivor alveoli of M., similar to a hot air balloon that rises to the sun after winning the force of gravity. […] She proudly told me her favorite moments: the time spent with her baby, the two weekly appointments at the Anti-Smoking Centre that allowed her to consume as few as three cigarettes a day, and then the minute, upon awakening, after taking her inhalation therapy, a harbinger of new energy, longer breaths of pleasure in climbing the stairs without difficulty.” “Today curing this person has become easy: every time I see him in the clinic we speak more of our problems than of his disease which is well controlled by treatment. Eventually, this led us in recent years to established a relationship of friendship.” “It has unleashed a backlash so annoying that I thought was not worth it to engage that much given the behavior and her feeling of frustration was moving to me because while I was talking about health, therapeutic output, percentage improvements in vital parameters, she replied she was angry because it was almost Christmas time and she did not know how to go to buy gifts for her girlfriends.” “The patient was oriented toward taking medication as needed, with therapeutic overlap between drugs prescribed by different doctors, arbitrary suspension, integrations with fancy aerosol of cortisone and mucolytic.”

Activities

Despite the mean age of patients being 69 years, patients were described in charts as still very active, full of interests, and often with an essential role in the family. Indeed, in 71% of the parallel charts physicians described the activities that patients had to give up or restrict because of their COPD symptoms (Box 4). These activities were divided among household activities, such as cooking and dressing (11%), activities that involved leaving the house (59%), such as gardening, work, city walks, shopping, exhibitions and theaters, and babysitting, or activities that required a high physical strain (30%), such as sports or travel.

Thanks to the treatment and support of doctors, these activities were resumed in 78% of cases; however, this percentage dropped to <35% in the subgroup burdened with a difficult relationship (Figure 2). Therefore, it is possible that the quality of the doctor–patient relationship has a direct impact on the ability to resume activities despite the disease; one possible explanation is the ability of physicians to identify and share patients’ goals when the relationship is positive.

Figure 2.

Restoration of activities according to the difficulty of the relationship.

Relationships with patients’ family members

The patient’s family was mentioned in 75% of the 243 parallel charts (Box 5); 17% of the patients lived alone. Relationships with lonely patients were often marked by sadness and tenderness, since physicians perceived their sense of loneliness and their need to be accepted and understood.

In 20% of the parallel charts, family members – often the patient’s spouse – served as caregivers at the visits and actively intervened, speaking in place of or in addition to the patient. Their presence was sometimes welcomed by doctors, who considered the relative an ally whose contributions helped the physician to understand the patient’s symptoms and possible targets for improvement; in other cases, the physician felt irritated by their intrusiveness. Relationships between patients and their family members were considered difficult in 22% of cases, while 61% of the patients with COPD could rely on a united and supportive family throughout treatment.

In 33% of the narratives, patients were in charge of taking care of grandchildren, disabled children, sick spouses, or “fragile” family members, which served as a stimulus for healing and improving COPD symptoms. For this group, being able to resume their caregiving activities was not only a personal need, but also a collective need for their entire family, since in their absence the role would have had to be performed by a paid professional.

Box 4. Example of extracts randomly selected by the researcher from the pool of parallel charts describing the activities.

Activities

“The husband takes care of everything, treating her like a porcelain doll.” “She noticed that she could go shopping with less fatigue. She was taking her grandchildren to school and each time she felt happiness – as if it were the first time. Though, she had stopped traveling.” “He was a former heavy smoker, with a poor quality of life that prevented him to devote himself to his ‘favorite’ hobbies: the care of his garden and walking. […] R.E. has not had exacerbations for a long time, he completes his gardening independently and above all he breathes without effort.” “When she came back one of the last times I saw her smile … she was finally able to take a walk to the shopping streets without dyspnea; she told me that for some time she had been a normal person …” “The first time the patient had traveled with oxygen, he had felt uncomfortable; but then he saw other people (especially foreigners, he had noticed) travel despite the need for oxygen, wheelchairs, walkers or other and he had calmed down.”

Physicians’ experience of the parallel chart

Sixty-five percent of physicians reported that they learned new aspects about their patients, thanks to the use of parallel chart (Box 6). Only 14% of pulmonologists reporting learning about only clinical aspects, while the majority of doctors also reported learning about aspects such as empathy, strength, positivity, and the importance of family. Fifteen percent of physicians, despite having a difficult relationship with their patient, stated that they were better able to recognize her/his errors and limits through writing the narrative and were thus able to have a better prospective for handling similar situations in the future.

Secondly, 74% of physicians declared that this experience made them realize they would be interested in improving themselves and develop a greater capacity for listening and empathy. However, 6% would have preferred to have more time to dedicate to the visits, while 20% of pulmonologists desired some improvements from the scientific point of view.

In conclusion, the physicians involved in the project described the parallel chart as a positive experience through which they were able to reflect and obtain new knowledge to improve their relationships and management of care. In addition, 42% of pulmonologists said that writing was helpful and hoped to be able to continue to apply narrative medicine in their daily practice.

Box 5. Example of extracts randomly selected by the researcher from the pool of parallel charts describing family relationship.

Family relationship

“They did anything to not make him feel like a burden, even if he had to walk slowly or stop because of breathlessness.” “Everyone scolded her because she continued smoking.” “He had recently moved to his daughter’s house to help her, as she had just separated from her husband, and was without a steady job, she would have to take care of three children by herself.” “Slowly, arm in arm with her husband (who always accompanies her) the lady enters the ambulatory clinic in a very serene way.” “I remember the first time he came into the studio with his wife, who began to talk extensively about all her husband’s problems while he was sitting in silence. After about 30 minutes of monologue I got up and I asked the lady to sit on the couch for the visit. She answered, ‘but the sufferer is my husband,’ and I still remember that he smiled.”

Discussion

Overall, this narrative experience was evaluated as positive by all of the participants, across specialties and professional age groups. The analysis of the feedback from physicians highlighted the usefulness of the parallel chart, as a narrative medicine tool, for encouraging the physicians to reflect on their relationships with people with COPD. This tool allowed physicians to focus on key ways in which the relationship evolved in a positive or negative way, and gain insight on the true needs of patients. Reflective writing, in fact, has been demonstrated to help establish empathic doctor–patient relationships.³⁹ It has already been included in several medical school training curricula, resulting in significant improvements in the physician’s clinical practice.⁴⁰ Unfortunately, writing requires time and, as reported in the results, physicians completed the parallel chart in 30 minutes on average. This means that it would be difficult to implement this tool in daily practice in Italy for all patients, due to practical time constrains. On the other hand, reflective writing could be implemented as a resource when pulmonologists have to deal with difficult cases to help them appreciate the critical importance of the relationship.

Box 6. Example of extracts randomly selected by the researcher from the pool of parallel charts describing the reflections made by pulmonologists within this project.

From the patient, I’m learning that …

“I’d like to be towards others as cheerful as he was for me.” “I wish I could avoid requesting clinical tests that have the only aim of reassuring the patient, since they belong to defensive medicine, and are potentially dangerous, such as in the case of imaging diagnostics.” “Listening is the first step to trust … and trust towards the physician is the piece of the puzzle that can allow a cure.” “Every case has its peculiarities. More complex cases are certainly the most challenging. Exceptional cases require we use unconventional approaches.” “[Patient name initial] taught me how much strength there is in despair, how much courage in continuing to live, despite there being many, many reasons to let go.”

The experience of writing

“The parallel chart is the only way that I could have expressed all the humanity of a relationship between people that goes far beyond the simple doctor–patient contact.” “Pleasantly surprised … I felt closer to my patients.” “I felt like someone who needs to communicate their results to others and succeeded in doing so.” “I felt frustrated in realizing that the solution to an acute problem was only a fraction of what the patient would have needed. However, having told his story I also felt relieved: although the story of a man like many others – his will not be lost.” “I felt the importance of my choices and my behavior on others and the influence of others on my choices and my behaviors.”

The study showed the significance of a linguistic (lexical and semantic) switch from a disease-centered description to a more patient-centered one. The issue of the language used by physicians with patients has been a relevant topic for ~20 years, and focused initially on the need for a change in the terminology used within routine checkup appointments, switching from disease-centered to more patient-centered medicine.⁴¹ Nevertheless, physicians are still struggling to avoid using technical terminology with their patients, and in some cases, this has proven to be an obstacle in the establishment/consolidation of the relationship with their patients. Indeed, our findings revealed that the physicians who used strictly disease-related terminology were those who reported the most difficult relationships with patients. Conversely, physicians who used both disease and illness-related terms in their narrations achieved the best results in overcoming difficult relationships. Furthermore, the parallel charts revealed a higher appreciation by patients of physicians who demonstrated both technical and empathic skills. Young pulmonologists (under 40) were found to have more difficulty in relating to patients than older clinicians: this could be explained by the strictly evidence-based medicine training carried out in recent years.⁴² As seen in Table 3, however, doctors have learned to use terminology more related to daily life. This change offers some proof of the fact that the writing of parallel charts helped doctors reflect on the lives of patients with COPD, as well as their own emotions and thoughts in relation to different situations.

According to our results, a critical factor in the doctor–patient relationship seemed to be patient smoking habits: smoking was perceived as the leading cause of sickness by doctors, who felt immediately uncomfortable when they had to treat a hard smoker. When the pulmonologist was able to overcome this initial discomfort, and listen to the patient, he or she was able to find a strategy to encourage the patient to end their dependence. In some cases, the most efficient strategy proved to be the use of threats; in other situations, patients were referred to smoking addiction rehabilitation centers, while others gained sufficient benefits from conversations with the doctor. These findings indicate that the same approach cannot be effective for (or imposed upon) all patients; rather, doctors should use dialogue and listening to identify the best approach for the individual.

Finally, these findings identified a previously overlooked aspect of COPD treatment: patients who returned to being active and resumed their regular activities, despite initial difficulties related to the symptoms of the disease, showed higher adherence to treatment. There are a few previously published studies on patients’ perception of COPD, but they all focus on a small number (10–15) of people with a severe form of the disease or who are in the acute phase.^5,43–45

Analysis of the parallel charts also showed that better patient management is achieved when physicians are able to identify and share patient’s personal goals, like being able to take care of their nephews or riding their bike. The ISTUD Foundation is currently conducting a follow-up study to better understand this aspect of pulmonologists’ perception.

Within the narratives, the working environment or environmental risk factors were scarcely mentioned, whereas there was a strong focus on smoking habits. This result confirms the findings from another study in which patients stated that their pulmonologists focused only on their smoking as a triggering factor for COPD.⁵

A limitation of this study was the lack of direct testimonies from the patients with COPD about their illness experience, since only the physicians’ point of view was recorded. The ISTUD Foundation is now completing another study that includes the voices of patients with COPD and their caregivers.⁴⁶ On the other hand, this study is innovative and particularly important considering that most studies in narrative medicine collect narratives from patients rather than from physicians. Therefore, this study represented a precious opportunity to obtain a snapshot of the current perceptions of Italian pulmonologists, although they may not be a nationally representative sample.⁴⁷ The parallel charts allowed us to understand how physicians reason, feel, and act when caring for patients with COPD, providing useful suggestions for possible areas of improvement.

Conclusion

This study showed that a positive relationship based on listening and understanding can help patients be more adherent to treatment, improve their lifestyle, resume activities that were interrupted because of failing health, and improve their quality of life. Doctors who are able to go beyond the strictly clinical aspects of care and to accept and understand people with COPD can limit the barriers to treatment and achieve satisfying results in the form of improved treatment adherence.