Abstract
Background
Mitochondrial reprogramming has emerged as a hallmark of cancer pathobiology. Although it is believed this reprogramming is essential for cancer cells to thrive, how it supports cancer pathobiology is unclear. We previously generated colonic ρ0 (rho0) cells with reduced mitochondrial energy function and acquired their transcriptional signature. Here, we utilized a bioinformatics approach to identify their changes linked to cancer pathobiology.
Methods
Human colon cancer HCT116 cells, control and ρ0, were used for qPCR. Bioinformatics analysis: GeneCards, Kaplan-Meier Survival, GENT, cBioPortal.
Results
The colonic ρ0 transcriptome was linked with proliferation, DNA replication, survival, tumor morphology, and cancer. Among differentially expressed transcripts, 281 were regulators or biomarkers of human colon cancer especially those with inflammatory microsatellite instability (MSI). We identified and validated novel transcripts in ρ0 cells with altered expression in human colon cancer. Among them DGK1, HTR7, FLRT3, and ZBTB18 co-occurred with established regulators of human colon cancer pathobiology. Also, increased levels of DGKI, FLRT3, ZBTB18, and YPEL1 as well as decreased levels of HTR7, and CALML6 were linked to substantially poorer patient survival.
Conclusion
We identified established and novel regulators in colon cancer pathobiology that are dependent on mitochondrial energy reprogramming and linked to poorer patient survival.
Keywords: colon cancer, mitochondria, ρ0 (rho0) cells, transcriptome
INTRODUCTION
Metabolic reprogramming has emerged as a new hallmark of cancer progression validating cancer as a metabolic disease [1, 2]. While mechanisms associated with increased glycolysis (Warburg effect) have re- emerged as a focus of cancer research, metabolic reprogramming associated with mitochondria, dynamic organelles known as powerhouses of the cell [3], is not well understood. It is believed that transformed cells would be unable to thrive without mitochondrial reprograming and emerging findings suggest that mitochondrial pleiotropic functions could be critical for cancer progression [2, 4]. As alterations in mitochondrial function could have profound effects on diverse cellular function, understanding the consequences of reprogramming in the pathobiology of cancer is required to define novel mechanisms and reliable targets for new treatment options.
Colon cancer, the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. (http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/), accounts for more than 694,000 annual deaths worldwide [5]. Colon cancer is driven in part by the microenvironment including imbalances in gut microbiota, inflammation, and obesity [6, 7]. Additional contributing factors in transformed colonic cells include genetic and epigenetic alterations in oncogenes, tumor suppressors, and signaling pathways. Such dysregulation is found with p53, APC, Wnt, KRAS, and PI3K, which consequently favor cellular transformation, proliferation, survival, and subsequent metastasis [8, 9]. Recent findings have revealed that some of these pathways or regulators also have metabolic function. For example, p53 controls various metabolic pathways including glycolysis, lipid metabolism, and mitochondrial function [4, 10]. Limited studies have shown that in some colon cancer cells, the presence of p53 in the mitochondria enhances DNA polymerase function while its deletion leads to disruption of the organelles activity and structure [11, 12], supporting the interconnection between regulators of colon cancer progression and mitochondrial function. Emerging findings have demonstrated colon cancer is associated with mitochondrial DNA deletions, mutations, and migration to the nucleus [3, 13, 14]. However, the role of alterations in mitochondrial function and underlying mechanisms in driving colon cancer are mainly unclear.
Mitochondria, energy producing organelles, utilize their respiration machinery for ATP synthesis (OXPHOS) from the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and fatty acid β-oxidation [15, 16]. Mitochondria play additional roles in cellular homeostasis by controlling production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), metabolites, and diverse cell signaling including those linked with calcium and cell death [3, 16]. Dysregulation in these mitochondrial functions, such as increased ROS levels, have been shown to foster tumor cell growth and survival [16]. More recent findings show that also dysfunction in mitochondrial biogenesis, networking, signaling, metabolism of fatty acids, and mitophagy are also associated with tumor growth [3, 16, 17], highlighting the role of this organelle in cancer pathobiology. It is plausible that dynamic mitochondrial function influences nuclear gene expression and methylation [18, 19], thus affecting oncogenes, tumor suppressors, and signaling pathways associated with tumor growth. Cells devoid of mitochondrial DNA, known as ρ0 (rho0), are a reliable model to study cellular function dependent on mitochondria [20], so we generated and characterized human colon cancer ρ0 (rho0) cells [21]. As ρ0 cells are resistant to ROS production and apoptosis [20, 22-24], it is logical to anticipate that the transcriptome of human colonic ρ0 cells is mainly dependent on loss of mitochondrial energy function. However, the characteristics of global transcriptomic changes in these cells with reduced mitochondrial energy function in human colon cancer pathobiology is poorly understood and understudied.
Here, by employing next generation RNA sequencing and a bioinformatics approach we identified in colonic ρ0 cells transcriptomic changes mediated by reduced mitochondrial energy function. We found substantial similarity between the transcriptomes of ρ0 cells and human colon cancer, especially those associated with microsatellite instability (MSI). Also, while a considerable number of established regulators of colon cancer depend on mitochondrial energy function, we also identified novel transcripts whose altered expression was linked to lower patient survival. These findings could facilitate understanding of new mechanisms behind colon cancer pathobiology mediated by mitochondrial energy reprogramming and also establish reliable biomarkers and targets for more efficient diagnosis and treatment options.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In colonic cells reduced mitochondrial function leads to altered nuclear gene expression associated with cancer
Although dysfunction in mitochondrial pleotropic functions have been associated with tumor growth [3, 16, 17], the role of mitochondrial energy reprograming in cancer pathobiology is not well understood. Lower mitochondrial ATP production is associated with colon cancer cell proliferation [25]. We found that decreased ATP synthase subunit ATP5A1, the enzyme responsible for catalyzing ATP production, is linked with considerably reduced colon cancer patient survival (Fig 1A) (p < 0.05). Since this supports a critical role for reduced mitochondrial energy function in colon cancer pathobiology, we analyzed in colonic ρ0 cells with decreased mitochondrial ATP production [21] if differentially expressed (DE) transcripts were associated with human colon cancer. Utilizing Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), we found that these DE transcripts were linked with cancer and cellular functions associated with cell cycle, proliferation, DNA replication and repair, cellular movement, cell survival, and tumor morphology (Fig 1B) (FDR < 0.05). In addition to gastrointestinal related pathobiology, IPA also revealed that reproductive, endocrine, and cardiovascular system disease phenotypes were affected by reduced mitochondrial function (Fig 1B) (FDR < 0.05). The association of ρ0 DE transcripts with cancer of multiple tissues could be due to common mechanisms shared among cancers. Also, it is plausible that reproductive and endocrine pathobiology is a result of the co-dependency of mitochondrial functions with hormone receptor signaling while cardiovascular pathology might be consequence of mitochondrial regulation of calcium levels [4]. Moreover, IPA revealed a considerable similarity between DE transcripts of ρ0 cells and human colon cancer (Fig 1C), especially those tumors annotated for MSI, a characteristic defined by ineffective DNA repair leading to hypermutation associated with an inflammatory tumor phenotype [26]. At the signaling level, there was similarity in a number of activated inflammatory pathways including IL-8, IL-6, NFκB, and IL-17 as well as those driving cancer including HGF, PDGF, TGF, PAK, and Integrin signaling (Fig 1C) (FDR < 0.05). The possible mechanisms mediated by mitochondria that lead to colon MSI cancer are unclear. There is a positive correlation between mitochondrial DNA mutation and nuclear MSI in stomach cancer [27]. It could be possible that the MSI phenotype of parental HCT116 cells might contribute to the ρ0 transcriptome and similarities shared with MSI human colon cancer, however, their DE transcripts utilized for analysis met a stringent threshold. For example, alteration in expression of established MSI “driver” genes, such as MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1), did not meet the statistical threshold and thus was not a part of ρ0 DE transcripts used for analysis. Also, as emerging findings show that mitochondria function could impact inflammation and nuclear DNA replication [21, 26, 28], we speculate, that in colonic ρ0 cells DE associated with MSI phenotype could be the consequence of both inflammation and aberrant DNA replication. Moreover, it is important to consider the colonic ρ0 transcriptome might also be driven by parental HCT116 cell mutations in K-ras and β-catenin genes (KRAS, CNNTB1) [29], Thus we performed unsupervised hierarchical clustering of activated canonical pathways from ρ0 transcriptomes with parental HCT116 cells and colon cancer RKO cells with wild-type K-ras and β-catenin. We found a considerably higher transcriptional overlap between parental HCT116 and RKO cells than with ρ0 cells (IPA) (Fig 1D), suggesting that the ρ0 transcriptome is influenced notably more by reduced mitochondrial function than by mutational alterations these cells may carry. Together these data demonstrate that in colon cancer cells, reduced mitochondrial function leads to nuclear transcriptional changes associated with dysregulation of multiple cellular functions leading to inflammatory MSI cancer.
Figure 1. Low mitochondrial energy function promotes cancer signaling.
A) In human colon cancer, patient survival was plotted for median mRNA expression of mitochondrial ATP5A1 (PROGgeneV2) (p < 0.05). B) Disease and biological functions associated with human colonic ρ0 transcriptome (IPA, FDR < 0.05). C) Top canonical pathways activated in human colonic ρ0 cells associated with colon cancer with MSI phenotype (TCGA) (IPA, FDR < 0.05). D) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of canonical pathway activation from transcriptomes of ρ0, HCT116 control, and RKO colon cancer cells (IPA).
Reduced mitochondrial function mediates expression of regulators, biomarkers, and novel facilitators of colon cancer
Next, we identified in the colonic ρ0 cells transcripts involved in the pathobiology of colon cancer. IPA recognized 281 transcripts that were associated with human colorectal adenocarcinoma including 20 currently recognized as biomarkers for diagnostic purposes (Supplemental 1). Among these transcripts were members of the mucin, matrix metallopeptidase, claudin, fibronectin, ankyrin, vimentin, and cyclin dependent kinase families suggesting mitochondrial dysregulation affects multiple cellular functions. Whether expression of these transcripts is directly or indirectly regulated by mitochondria needs to be determined, our analysis indicates that energy reprograming of this organelle plays a central role in the pathobiology of colon cancer.
Furthermore, we identified novel transcripts in the colonic ρ0 transcriptome that are involved in various cell functions, but have not been recognized in cancer pathobiology (genecards.org). Elevated levels of diacylglycerol kinase iota (DGKI), fibronectin leucine rich transmembrane protein 3 (FLRT3), zinc finger and BTB domain containing 18 (ZBTB18 (or ZNF238)), and yippee like 1 (YPEL1) were observed, while transcripts decreased in expression included 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 7 (HTR7) and calmodulin like 6 (CALML6). Changes in expression in colonic ρ0 cells of selected transcripts, DGKI and FLRT3, were verified by qPCR (Fig 2A). As a positive control of elevated transcripts measured in ρ0 cells, Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 16 (IFI16), known to be involved in colon cancer [30], was confirmed (Fig 2A). Moreover, we found that expression of these transcripts was connected with established drivers of human colon cancer pathobiology as they had 135 co-occurring or mutually exclusive expression patterns, of which 24 co-occurred in a significant pattern (Fig 2B) (p < 0.05). For example, in human colon cancer tissues DGKI, a regulator of lipid signaling, and HTR7, a neurotransmitter receptor, were coordinately expressed with each other and with EPAS1 and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1 (PTGS1). Expression of FLRT3, involved in cell adhesion and receptor signaling, co-occurred with arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase (ALOX5), and insulin like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3); ZBTB18, a transcriptional repressor, with cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A). Together, we showed that mitochondrial function mediated expression of novel transcripts involved in diverse cellular function co-occur with expression of established regulators of colon cancer.
Figure 2. Novel transcripts from colonic ρ0 cells are co-expressed with established regulators of colon cancer.
A) RNA from HCT116 cells, control and ρ0, was used for quantitative PCR of selected transcripts: novel (DGKI and FLRT3) and established (IFI16) (n=4, *p < 0.05 relative to control). B) Co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity plots for differentially expressed selected transcripts in ρ0 cells and known regulators and biomarkers of colorectal cancer (TCGA, cBioPortal, p < 0.05).
Expression of novel transcripts dependent on reduced mitochondrial function in human colon cancer tissues is associated with poor survival
As the function of these six DE transcripts in ρ0 cells is unexplored we assessed if their levels were altered in human colon cancer tissues across 2,500 individual patient microarray samples from the GENT database. We found in human colon cancer relative to normal tissues that elevated DGKI, FLRT3, ZBTB18 and YPEL1 transcripts were also increased, while attenuated HTR7 and CALML6 transcripts were lowered (Fig 3A). Their altered expression was also observed in cancers of other digestive tissues such as stomach, liver, and pancreas as well as in reproductive tissues, yet their expression appears to vary based on tissue type. Also, we found that among human colon cancer elevated DGKI, FLRT3, ZBTB18 and YPEL1 transcripts were particularly dysregulated in roughly 13% of patients (Fig 3B). Furthermore, a combined increase in DGKI, FLRT3, ZBTB18, and YPEL1 levels as well as a combined decrease in HTR7 and CALML6 levels were associated with significantly poorer patient survival (Fig 4A,B, p < 0.05). Together, we identified that six novel regulators of diverse cellular function, transcriptionally dependent on mitochondrial activity, are involved in colon cancer pathobiology. Although the mechanisms utilized by these novel regulators in colon cancer pathobiology needs to be determined we hypothesized that they might be directly or indirectly facilitating the disease. DGKl has functions in lipid metabolism and its increase was found in hepatocellular carcinoma [31]. It is plausible that increased DGK1 function creates lipids as building blocks for membranes of highly proliferative cancer cells and lipid signaling could promote inflammation associated with MSI phenotype [32]. Dysregulation of FLRT3 and ZBTB18, as a transmembrane protein and transcriptional repressor, could have broad implications in cancer pathobiology. It is recently reported that ZBTB18 is associated with glioblastoma progression [33]. Furthermore, the role of HTR7, a serotonin receptor, in cancer is largely unknown, yet it has been recently implicated in macrophage activity and inflammation [34], both important in the tumor inflammatory microenvironment [35]. CALML6 regulates calcium levels [36], which was recently suggested as a potentially new target to galvanize tumor suppressors for cancer treatment [37]. Also, regulators of calcium levels are implicated in the inflammatory response as well as cancer signaling [38, 39]. Lastly, YPEL1, a member of the YPEL family, localizes to the centrosome and plays a role in cell division [40], which could support cancer progression, yet the mitochondria-YPEL-centrosome axis needs further understanding. We speculate that decreased YPEL1 levels could lead to aberrant centrosome function thereby driving genomic instability as seen with MSI colon cancer. Moreover, since altered expression patterns of these novel regulators are variable among cancers of different tissues we speculate this could be mediated by influences from the surrounding microenvironment. Specifically, the ability of cancer cells to uptake functional mitochondria from surrounding cells [41] reveals that dynamic mitochondrial reprogramming with cancer pathobiology could be cancer-tissue specific, requiring further exploration of their function in this regard.
Figure 3. Novel transcripts from colonic ρ0 cells have altered expression across human cancer tissues.
A) Expression of DGKI, FLRT3, ZBTB18 and YPEL1 is increased while expression of HTR7 and CALML6 is decreased in human colon cancer tissues relative to normal across the GENT database. Boxes (red – cancer and green – normal) show the median and 25th and 75th percentiles, whereas dots represent outliers; the horizontal red and green dashed lines represent average expression values for each selected gene across normal and tumor tissues. Colon cancer has been highlighted in the dashed blue box. B) Alterations in expression of the four selected transcripts increased in ρ0 cells among human colon cancer tissues. Individual transcripts are represented as rows, whereas individual colon cancer cases are shown as columns (TCGA, cBioPortal).
Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of human colon cancer patients with alterations in novel transcripts from colonic ρ0 cells.
(A) Poorer patient survival was linked with increased levels of DGKI, FLRT3, ZBTB18, and YPEL1 expression (PROGgeneV2) (p < 0.05). (B) Poorer patient survival was linked with decreased levels of HTR7 and CALML6 expression (PROGgeneV2) (p < 0.05).
Collectively, we found in colonic cells that reduced mitochondrial energy function leads to transcriptomic changes associated with human colon cancer pathobiology, especially those with MSI. We also identified that a substantial number of established regulators linked to colon cancer are dependent on mitochondrial reprograming. Furthermore, we demonstrated novel transcripts with altered expression in human colon cancer tissues correlate with reduced patient survival. Alterations in mitochondrial pleiotropic functions are found to facilitate diverse human diseases including cancer; thereby, becoming a prime area of research in the past decade. This wide spectrum of diseases includes diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, leigh syndrome, neuropathy, mitochondrial myopathy, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and Huntington's diseases [4, 16, 21, 42]. Emerging findings support that reprograming of mitochondrial pleiotropic functions facilitate cancer pathobiology, which could also underlie ethnic differences in tumor diversity and aggressiveness seen in colon cancer [2, 4, 16]. These findings provide insights into novel signaling mechanisms mediated by mitochondrial reprograming favoring cancer pathobiology and provide the potential opportunity for a new therapeutic approach for cancer treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Tissue culture and human colon cancer ρ0 (rho0) cells
Human colon cancer HCT116 cells (ATCC) were cultured in McCoy's 5A media (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Human colon cancer HCT116 ρ0 (rho0) cells were propagated in media containing 15% FBS, 100µM pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 50µg/ml uridine (Sigma-Aldrich), and 2.5µM ethidium bromide and passaged 8-10 times [20]. Loss of mitochondrial DNA was confirmed by PCR as described before [21]. Before experimental procedures, cells were incubated overnight in media without serum.
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, sequencing, clustering, differential expression, and pathway analysis
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, sequencing, differential expression testing, and pathway analysis were performed as described before [21, 43]. Sequencing data for this study is available through NCBI's Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number SRP093357. Raw transcriptomic reads from RKO colon cancer cells were obtained from SRA study SRP074476 (accession numbers: SRR3479758, SRR3479759, SRR3479760). After alignment and transcript quantification was performed as referenced above, transcriptomes from ρ0 cells, HCT116 control, and RKO cells were subject to unsupervised hierarchical clustering using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Qiagen Inc.). The transcriptional signature of colonic ρ0 cells was compared to expression data derived from human colorectal cancer (CRC) samples (GSE4183, NCBI GEO). For comparison of the colonic ρ0 cell expression signature against expression data from inflammatory human microsatellite instable (MSI) human colon cancers, quantified RNA-seq data was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov) [44] via Firebrowse (firebrowse.org).
qPCR
Total RNA was extracted with QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen) followed by reverse transcription employing the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Oligo-dT12-18 primers according to the standard protocol [21, 43]. The following primers were used for quantification of cDNA specifically binding FLRT3 (FLRT3-FOR 5′-GGTATTGCGGGTGCAAGATG-3′, FLRT3-REV 5′-GCCATCCCACGAACCTTTTC-3′), DGKI (DGKI- FOR 5′-CAGGTCTCGTACAGGAAAGCA-3′, DGKI REV-5′-ACTCCACTCCAAAGTCGCTC-3′), IFI16 (IFI16-FOR 5′-GAAGTGCCAGCGTAACTCCT-3′, IFI16-REV 5′-ACCTCAAACACCCCATTCACA-3′), and HPRT1 (HPRT1-FOR 5′-GACCAGTCAACAGGGGACAT-3′, HPRT1-REV 5′-AACACTTCGTGGGGTCCTTTTC-3′). Relative levels of mRNA were calculated with HPRT1 as the housekeeping gene using the comparative Ct method.
Gene function and analysis
Gene function in human health and disease was assessed using GeneCards (www.genecards.org).
Kaplan-Meier survival plots
Survival analysis of human CRC adenocarcinoma patients for selected genes was accomplished by PROGgeneV2 [45] (http://www.compbio.iupui.edu/ proggene). PROGgeneV2 survival was determined for individual genes or gene signatures from the following cohorts GSE41258, GSE17537, GSE17536. Cohorts were bifurcated using median expression of each gene or gene signature of interest.
GENT
Gene expression across normal and tumor tissues was accomplished using the GENT database for cancer bioinformatics [46] (http://medical-genomics.kribb.re.kr/GENT/). This database has collected public expression depositories from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Array Express using the Affymetrix U133 platforms.
cBioPortal for cancer genomics
The cBioPortal for human cancer genomics (www.cbioportal.org) was employed for generation of OncoPrints and co-expression and mutual exclusivity plots of selected transcripts in human colorectal adenocarcinoma patient samples [47] (TCGA COAD). Selected genes were analyzed using a z-score threshold of ±2, meaning that selected transcripts were significantly altered (up or down) at least 2 standard deviations away from their mean expression in human colon cancer (RNA-seq V2 RSEM; Case Set: All Tumors (629 patients /633 samples)).
Statistical analysis
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student- Newman-Keuls post-test or Student's unpaired t test were used for statistical analysis employing GraphPad Instat 3 software (GraphPad Software). All data are shown as means ± S.E. for a sequence of experiments and a p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS TABLE
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center DNA Sequencing Facility for providing next generation sequencing facilities and services.
Abbreviations
- DGKI
diacylglycerol kinase iota
- FLRT3
fibronectin leucine rich transmembrane protein 3
- ZBTB18
zinc finger and BTB domain containing 18
- YPEL1
yippee like 1
- HTR7
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor
- CALML6
calmodulin like 6
- CRC
colorectal cancer
- MSI
microsatellite instability
- GEO
Gene Expression Omnibus
- TCGA
The Cancer Genome Atlas
- IPA
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis
- GENT
Gene Expression across Normal and Tumor tissue
- FDR
false discovery rate
Footnotes
Author contributions
SH, HP, and SDS - conception and design of research; SH, HP, and CC - performed experiments; SH, HP, HN, NU, MB, and SDS - analyzed data; SH and HP - prepared figures; SH, ZP, EF, SEC, and SDS - interpreted results; SDS - wrote the manuscript; all authors approved final version of manuscript.
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS
Suzana D. Savkovic wishes to disclose ownership in Pegasus Biosolution, LLC. No other conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
GRANT SUPPORT
This work is supported by an NIH RO1 award (CA160809).
REFERENCES
- 1.DeBerardinis RJ, Chandel NS. Fundamentals of cancer metabolism. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1600200. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600200. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim A. Mitochondria in Cancer Energy Metabolism: culprits or Bystanders? Toxicol Res. 2015;31:323–30. doi: 10.5487/TR.2015.31.4.323. https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2015.31.4.323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Suliman HB, Piantadosi CA. Mitochondrial Quality Control as a Therapeutic Target. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68:20–48. doi: 10.1124/pr.115.011502. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.115.011502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Choudhury AR, Singh KK. Mitochondrial determinants of cancer health disparities. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;47:125–46. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.05.001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pietrzyk L, Torres A, Maciejewski R, Torres K. Obesity and Obese-related Chronic Low-grade Inflammation in Promotion of Colorectal Cancer Development. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:4161–68. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.10.4161. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.10.4161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marchesi JR, Dutilh BE, Hall N, Peters WH, Roelofs R, Boleij A, Tjalsma H. Towards the human colorectal cancer microbiome. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Polakis P. Wnt signaling in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4:a008052. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008052. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a008052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Cancer-susceptibility genes. Gatekeepers and caretakers. Nature. 1997;386(761):763. doi: 10.1038/386761a0. https://doi.org/10.1038/386761a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Berkers CR, Maddocks OD, Cheung EC, Mor I, Vousden KH. Metabolic regulation by p53 family members. Cell Metab. 2013;18:617–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.06.019. https://doi.org/10.1016/jcmet.2013.06.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Achanta G, Sasaki R, Feng L, Carew JS, Lu W, Pelicano H, Keating MJ, Huang P. Novel role of p53 in maintaining mitochondrial genetic stability through interaction with DNA Pol gamma. EMBO J. 2005;24:3482–92. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600819. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhou S, Kachhap S, Singh KK. Mitochondrial impairment in p53-deficient human cancer cells. Mutagenesis. 2003;18:287–92. doi: 10.1093/mutage/18.3.287. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/18.3.287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen T, He J, Shen L, Fang H, Nie H, Jin T, Wei X, Xin Y, Jiang Y, Li H, Chen G, Lu J, Bai Y. The mitochondrial DNA 4,977-bp deletion and its implication in copy number alteration in colorectal cancer. BMC Med Genet. 2011;12:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-12-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Srinivasainagendra V, Sandel MW, Singh B, Sundaresan A, Mooga VP, Bajpai P, Tiwari HK, Singh KK. Migration of mitochondrial DNA in the nuclear genome of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Genome Med. 2017;9:31. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0420-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-017-0420-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boekema EJ, Braun HP. Supramolecular structure of the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:1–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R600031200. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R600031200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vyas S, Zaganjor E, Haigis MC. Mitochondria and Cancer. Cell. 2016;166:555–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chourasia AH, Boland ML, Macleod KF. Mitophagy and cancer. Cancer Metab. 2015;3:4. doi: 10.1186/s40170-015-0130-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-015-0130-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li K, Neufer PD, Williams RS. Nuclear responses to depletion of mitochondrial DNA in human cells. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:C1265–70. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1995.269.5.C1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Smiraglia DJ, Kulawiec M, Bistulfi GL, Gupta SG, Singh KK. A novel role for mitochondria in regulating epigenetic modification in the nucleus. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7:1182–90. doi: 10.4161/cbt.7.8.6215. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.7.8.6215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.King MP, Attardi G. Human cells lacking mtDNA: repopulation with exogenous mitochondria by complementation. Science. 1989;246:500–03. doi: 10.1126/science.2814477. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2814477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Heller S, Penrose HM, Cable C, Biswas D, Nakhoul H, Baddoo M, Flemington E, Crawford SE, Savkovic SD. Reduced mitochondrial activity in colonocytes facilitates AMPKα2-dependent inflammation. FASEB J. 2017;31:2013–25. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600976R. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201600976R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Arnould T, Mercy L, Houbion A, Vankoningsloo S, Renard P, Pascal T, Ninane N, Demazy C, Raes M. mtCLIC is up-regulated and maintains a mitochondrial membrane potential in mtDNA-depleted L929 cells. FASEB J. 2003;17:2145–47. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0075fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sidoti-de Fraisse C, Rincheval V, Risler Y, Mignotte B, Vayssière JL. TNF-alpha activates at least two apoptotic signaling cascades. Oncogene. 1998;17:1639–51. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202094. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chevallet M, Lescuyer P, Diemer H, van Dorsselaer A, Leize-Wagner E, Rabilloud T. Alterations of the mitochondrial proteome caused by the absence of mitochondrial DNA: A proteomic view. Electrophoresis. 2006;27:1574–83. doi: 10.1002/elps.200500704. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200500704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sánchez-Aragó M, Chamorro M, Cuezva JM. Selection of cancer cells with repressed mitochondria triggers colon cancer progression. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:567–76. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq012. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgq012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1073–81. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp127. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Habano W, Sugai T, Nakamura SI, Uesugi N, Yoshida T, Sasou S. Microsatellite instability and mutation of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA in gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:835–41. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70169-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70169-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mourier T, Hansen AJ, Willerslev E, Arctander P. The Human Genome Project reveals a continuous transfer of large mitochondrial fragments to the nucleus. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18:1833–37. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003971. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Morin PJ, Sparks AB, Korinek V, Barker N, Clevers H, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC. Science. 1997;275:1787–90. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5307.1787. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5307.1787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.van de Wetering M, Francies HE, Francis JM, Bounova G, Iorio F, Pronk A, van Houdt W, van Gorp J, Taylor-Weiner A, Kester L, McLaren-Douglas A, Blokker J, Jaksani S, et al. Prospective derivation of a living organoid biobank of colorectal cancer patients. Cell. 2015;161:933–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Revill K, Wang T, Lachenmayer A, Kojima K, Harrington A, Li J, Hoshida Y, Llovet JM, Powers S. Genome-wide methylation analysis and epigenetic unmasking identify tumor suppressor genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2013(145):1424–1435. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.055. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.055 e1421-1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Currie E, Schulze A, Zechner R, Walther TC, Farese RV., Jr Cellular fatty acid metabolism and cancer. Cell Metab. 2013;18:153–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.05.017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.05.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fedele V, Dai F, Masilamani AP, Heiland DH, Kling E, Gätjens-Sanchez AM, Ferrarese R, Platania L, Soroush D, Kim H, Nelander S, Weyerbrock A, Prinz M, et al. Epigenetic Regulation of ZBTB18 Promotes Glioblastoma Progression. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15:998–1011. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0494. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.de Las Casas-Engel M, Corbí AL. Serotonin modulation of macrophage polarization: inflammation and beyond. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;824:89–115. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07320-0_9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07320-0_9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lewis CE, Pollard JW. Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments. Cancer Res. 2006;66:605–12. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4005. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Plattner H. Molecular aspects of calcium signalling at the crossroads of unikont and bikont eukaryote evolution—the ciliated protozoan Paramecium in focus. Cell Calcium. 2015;57:174–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.12.002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2014.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Raynal NJ, Lee JT, Wang Y, Beaudry A, Madireddi P, Garriga J, Malouf GG, Dumont S, Dettman EJ, Gharibyan V, Ahmed S, Chung W, Childers WE, et al. Targeting Calcium Signaling Induces Epigenetic Reactivation of Tumor Suppressor Genes in Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76:1494–505. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2391. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lee GS, Subramanian N, Kim AI, Aksentijevich I, Goldbach-Mansky R, Sacks DB, Germain RN, Kastner DL, Chae JJ. The calcium-sensing receptor regulates the NLRP3 inflammasome through Ca2+ and cAMP. Nature. 2012;492:123–27. doi: 10.1038/nature11588. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nussinov R, Wang G, Tsai CJ, Jang H, Lu S, Banerjee A, Zhang J, Gaponenko V. Calmodulin and PI3K Signaling in KRAS Cancers. Trends Cancer. 2017;3:214–24. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.01.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2017.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hosono K, Sasaki T, Minoshima S, Shimizu N. Identification and characterization of a novel gene family YPEL in a wide spectrum of eukaryotic species. Gene. 2004;340:31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Katrangi E, D'Souza G, Boddapati SV, Kulawiec M, Singh KK, Bigger B, Weissig V. Xenogenic transfer of isolated murine mitochondria into human rho0 cells can improve respiratory function. Rejuvenation Res. 2007;10:561–70. doi: 10.1089/rej.2007.0575. https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2007.0575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pagliarini DJ, Rutter J. Hallmarks of a new era in mitochondrial biochemistry. Genes Dev. 2013;27:2615–27. doi: 10.1101/gad.229724.113. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.229724.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Penrose HM, Heller S, Cable C, Nakhoul H, Baddoo M, Flemington E, Crawford SE, Savkovic SD. High-fat diet induced leptin and Wnt expression: RNA-sequencing and pathway analysis of mouse colonic tissue and tumors. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38:302–11. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgx001. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgx001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cancer Genome Atlas N, and Cancer Genome Atlas Network Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487:330–37. doi: 10.1038/nature11252. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Goswami CP, Nakshatri H. PROGgene: gene expression based survival analysis web application for multiple cancers. J Clin Bioinforma. 2013;3:22. doi: 10.1186/2043-9113-3-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-3-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shin G, Kang TW, Yang S, Baek SJ, Jeong YS, Kim SY. GENT: gene expression database of normal and tumor tissues. Cancer Inform. 2011;10:149–57. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S7226. https://doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S7226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, Sun Y, Jacobsen A, Sinha R, Larsson E, Cerami E, Sander C, Schultz N. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6:l1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2004088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




