Abstract
Aims: Excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) may increase the prevalence of obesity and other metabolic risk factors. However, data regarding the relationship between SSB consumption and metabolic risk factors are insufficient in Chinese children. Hence, we aimed to explore the association between SSB consumption and cardio-metabolic risk factors in children aged 7–18 years living in South China.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a total of 2,032 children aged 7–18 years were enrolled, including 1,013 boys and 1,019 girls. Based on a multistage cluster sampling, five elementary and four secondary schools in Guangzhou, China were included. Fasting blood glucose levels, lipid profiles, and anthropometric characteristics were evaluated. Information on demography, dietary, and physical activities were self-reported.
Results: Overall, 34.7% participants were non-drinkers and 21.6% consumed more than 120 mL/day SSB. The body mass index (19.43 ± 0.18 kg/m2) and triglyceride concentration (0.96 ± 0.03 mmol/L) were higher and high-density lipoprotein concentration (1.32 ± 0.31 mmol/L) was lower in consumers than in non-consumers (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, in contrast to non-consumers, the adjusted odds ratio of SSB consumption more than 120 mL/day was 2.08 (95% CI: 1.21–3.54) for obesity, 1.83 (95% CI: 1.25–2.69) for abdominal obesity, and 1.70 (95% CI: 1.02–3.06) for hypertriglyceridemia in consumers.
Conclusion: A positive association between SSB consumption and the risks of obesity and hypertriglyceridemia was observed in children living in South China, which suggests that high SSB consumption enhances the risk of cardio-metabolic risk factors and the consequent cardio-metabolic diseases.
Keywords: Sugar-sweetened beverages, Obesity, Lipid profile
Introduction
With the rapid economic growth and drastic global shifts in diet and lifestyle, the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related cardiovascular risk factors in children, including hypertension and abnormal lipid and elevated fasting glucose levels, have increased evidently worldwide in the recent decades1–3). According to the Chinese National Survey on Constitution and Health in Students, the combined prevalence of obesity and overweight in Chinese children aged 7–18 years had reached 19.2% in 20104). Meanwhile, Chinese children have also experienced a significant increase in the prevalence of other cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, impaired fasting glucose, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) during the past several years5–8). Considering that these health problems not only affect the metabolic and psychosocial status in the short term but also contribute to a higher risk for consequent cardiovascular diseases in adulthood, it is important to determine valid measures for the prevention of obesity and other cardiovascular disorders in children.
Energy-dense diets, brought about by improved economic conditions, have been considered to be one of the determinants of the rapid increase of obesity as well as other cardiovascular risk factors9). As one of the important types of energy-dense diets, excessive sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption may bring about heavy energy intake and would be strongly associated with obesity and obesity-related risk factors. Several studies have reported a positive relationship between SSB consumption and obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults and children, while others have not10–14). A study has revealed that an extra cup of SSB per day would increase the risk of obesity by 1.6 times in American children aged 11.7 years on average15). A similar study on the relationship between excessive SSB consumption and obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors was limited to Chinese children. Most of the previous studies mainly focused on the frequency of SSB consumption and sugar and energy intake from SSB. Additionally, effective policies were put forth to control SSB consumption in other countries, such as an additional 20% tax on SSB in Australia16), whereas no official measures were carried out in China. Therefore, we conducted this study mainly to estimate SSB consumption and to explore the relationship between daily SSB consumption and the risks of obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors in children living in South China to provide evidences to put forth SSB controlling policies in China.
Methods
Study Design and Sample
The study was designed as a cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from a baseline survey that was performed in a national multi-centered project on school-based health lifestyle interventions against obesity among Chinese children and adolescents during 2013 and 201417). The initial sample included 2,878 children recruited from five elementary and four secondary schools in Guangzhou. Children aged 7–18 years and those who completed the anthropometric measurement, questionnaire assessment, and blood sample collection were eligible to participate in this study (n = 2,157). Participants were excluded if they refused to finish anthropometric measurement, questionnaire assessment, and blood sample collection, if their data for SSB consumption were missing, or if they had acute or chronic diseases (n = 125). The final sample consisted of 2,032 children. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Peking University. Written informed consents were obtained from both students and their legal guardians.
Anthropometric Measurement
Anthropometric measurements of height, weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure were all made by experienced clinicians and nurses according to standardized methods. Participants were requested to be in light clothing during the measurements. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a fixed stadiometer. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a level scale and then body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Waist circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a flexible tape in the standing position after a gentle respiration, taking the umbilical scar as the reference. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures of children were measured in a seated position using a sphygmomanometer. The meanof two consecutive measures was used in the analyses.
Assessment of SSB Consumption and Lifestyle Factors
The self-reported questionnaire in this study included questions regarding general demographic information (age and gender), physical activities (mainly including vigorous-intensity and moderate-intensity activities), sedentary behavior, sleep duration, dietary information, SSB consumption, and the attitudes of teachers and schools of the children toward SSB consumption. To estimate SSB consumption and frequency, the question was put forth as: “How many days and how many servings of SSB did you have last week? (SSB include carbonated drinks, juices, and sports and sweet tea beverages. One serving of SSB was approximately equal to 250 mL.)”. For dietary information, similar questions regarding the consumption of fruit, vegetable, and meat were asked (One serving of the fruit, vegetable, and meat was approximately equal to the palm size of an adult). Children were also asked questions regarding their teachers' and schools' attitudes toward SSB consumption, including “Does your teacher allow you to bring the SSB into the classroom?” and “Can you buy SSB in the canteen or the stores of your school?” For physical activities, moderate-intensity (those having 3–6 metabolic equivalents) and vigorous-intensity (those having > 6 metabolic equivalents) activities were estimated by giving examples. The question asked was as follows: “How many days and how many hours per day did you perform vigorous-intensity (such as running, basketball, football, and physical fitness activities) and moderate-intensity (such as table tennis, moving something light, and dancing) activities last week?” For sedentary behavior, the question was as follows: “How many hours and minutes did you sit and lie (excluding sleeping) per day?” For sleeping duration, children were asked the question: “How many hours do you sleep per day?” Sleep duration per day was categorized into four groups (< 7.0, 7–9, 9–11, and > 11 h/day). All these questions were previously tested and validated.
Lipid and Glucose Concentrations in Serum
Venous blood samples were drawn after an overnight fast. Both serum and plasma were collected by centrifugation at 3000 r/min for 10 min at 4°C and thereafter, stored at −80°C until analysis. The serum concentrations of glucose and lipids (triglyceride, high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol) were determined using commercial colorimetric kits (Biosino Biotechnology Company Ltd, Beijing, China) and an automated analyzer (Hitachi Co Ltd). These analyses were performed in specialty laboratories accredited by the Peking University. For all laboratory methods, the inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were below 5%.
Definition of Obesity and Other Cardio-Metabolic Risk Factors
According to the guidelines of the Working Group on Obesity in China, obesity and overweight were defined as BMI ≥ 95th and 85th percentile using age- and gender-specific cutoff points, respectively18, 19). Abdominal obesity was defined as WC ≥ 90th percentile using age and gender-specific cutoff points20).
Other cardio-metabolic risk factors, including hypertension, abnormal fasting glucose and lipid levels, dyslipidemia, and MetS, were mainly defined using the MetS criteria proposed by Cook et al21). Hypertension was defined as either SBP or DBP ≥ 90th percentile using age-, gender-, and height-specific cutoff points22). Elevated fasting glucose level was defined as the fasting glucose level ≥ 5.6 mmol/L. Hypertriglyceridemia was defined as TG ≥ 1.7 mmol/L. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as TC ≥ 5.18 mmol/L. Dyslipidemia was defined as having one or more of the following abnormal lipids levels: TG ≥ 1.7 mmol/L, TC ≥ 5.18 mmol/L, HDL ≤ 1.03 mmol/L, and LDL ≥ 3.36 mmol/L21, 23). MetS was defined as meeting three or more of the following criteria: abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, TG ≥ 1.7 mmol/L, HDL-C ≤ 1.03 mmol/L, and fasting serum glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/L21).
Statistical Analysis
The data bank was established by Epidata 3.0 software (The Epidata Association, Odense, Denmark). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS 19.0, Chicago, USA). Characteristics of the participants were first presented as number and percentage in different categories. The average SSB consumption among the categories of different characteristics was presented as mean and standard error. The quartiles calculated by the software were then applied to determine SSB consumption levels. Chi-square test was used to determine the difference between categorical variables, while t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for the comparison of continuous variables among the four SSB consumptions. Post hoc Dunnet's t-test was applied to examine the intergroup differences. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between SSB consumption and cardiovascular risk factors in both crude and adjusted models controlling for age, gender, and physical activities. A two-sided P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
SSB Consumption Among Categories of Different Characteristics
A total of 2,032 children were included in this study, including 1,013 boys and 1,019 girls. Their age ranged from 6 to 18 years (69.0% ranged from 6 to 12 years and 31.0% from 13 to 18 years). In these participants, 230 (11.3%) children were overweight, 178 (8.8%) were obese, and 423 (20.8%) were with higher waist circumference. The mean SSB consumption in all participants was 90.45 ± 3.55 mL/day. SSB consumption even reached 138.51 ± 4.96 mL/day per consumer. Overall, 34.7% participants were non-drinkers, 21.7% reported that they consumed more than 120 mL per day (which approximately equals more than 3 servings a week), and 9.5% consumed more than 250 mL per day. Table 1 shows SSB consumption of children in different categories of the characteristics including gender, age, nutritional status, fasting glucose level, lipid profile, their teacher's and school's attitude toward their SSB drinking behavior, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and sleeping duration. Children having higher SSB consumption were more likely to be boys and to have higher age and lower sleeping duration. Their SSB drinking behaviors were more likely to be not prohibited by their teachers and schools. However, no statistical significance in SSB consumption was revealed among children with different nutritional statuses, physical activities, and fasting glucose and lipids levels.
Table 1. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and characteristics of the participants (n = 2032).
Characteristics | Categories | Amount |
SSBs intake (ml/day) |
P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | mean | SE | |||
Gender | Boys | 1013 | 49.9 | 112.04 | 6.03 | < 0.001 |
Girls | 1019 | 50.1 | 69.00 | 3.66 | ||
Age | 6–12 y | 1402 | 69.0 | 64.21 | 2.95 | < 0.001 |
13–18 y | 630 | 31.0 | 148.86 | 8.96 | ||
BMIa | Underweight | 276 | 13.6 | 73.38 | 7.45 | 0.099 |
Normal | 1345 | 66.2 | 90.00 | 4.61 | ||
Overweight | 230 | 11.3 | 106.91 | 10.58 | ||
Obese | 178 | 8.8 | 100.64 | 10.45 | ||
WCb | Normal | 1609 | 79.2 | 87.78 | 4.05 | 0.143 |
High | 423 | 20.8 | 100.61 | 7.35 | ||
TCc | Normal | 1790 | 88.1 | 92.48 | 3.92 | 0.121 |
High | 242 | 11.9 | 75.44 | 7.09 | ||
LDL-Cd | Normal | 1877 | 92.4 | 91.32 | 3.77 | 0.274 |
High | 155 | 7.6 | 79.97 | 9.62 | ||
TGe | Normal | 1930 | 95.0 | 89.01 | 3.58 | 0.076 |
High | 102 | 5.0 | 118.1 | 20.65 | ||
HDL-Cf | Normal | 1788 | 87.7 | 88.14 | 3.69 | 0.130 |
Low | 249 | 12.3 | 107.04 | 11.90 | ||
SBPg | Normal | 1917 | 94.3 | 91.03 | 3.72 | 0.342 |
High | 115 | 5.7 | 80.90 | 9.94 | ||
DBPh | Normal | 1904 | 93.7 | 90.86 | 3.71 | 0.659 |
High | 128 | 6.3 | 84.40 | 11.75 | ||
FSGi | Normal | 2002 | 98.5 | 90.20 | 3.59 | 0.566 |
High | 30 | 1.5 | 107.14 | 27.82 | ||
Teacher's attitude | Allow | 350 | 17.2 | 144.76 | 11.38 | < 0.001 |
Not allow | 1662 | 81.8 | 79.14 | 3.54 | ||
School's attitude | Allow | 876 | 43.1 | 117.18 | 6.66 | < 0.001 |
Not allow | 1134 | 55.8 | 70.45 | 3.62 | ||
MVPAj | < 2 h/day | 1455 | 71.6 | 87.97 | 3.85 | 0.104 |
≥2 h/day | 170 | 8.4 | 115.8 | 16.54 | ||
Sleep duration | < 9 h/day | 1453 | 71.5 | 93.90 | 4.19 | < 0.001 |
≥9 h/day | 410 | 20.2 | 61.15 | 7.08 |
BMI = Body mass index
WC = Waist circumference
TC = Total cholesterol
LDL-C = low-density lipid protein cholesterol
TG = Triglyceride
HDL = High-density lipid protein cholesterol
SBP = Systolic blood pressure
DBP = Diastolic blood pressure
FSG = Fasting serum glucose
MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activities
Characteristics of the Participants Stratified by SSB Consumption
Characteristics of the participants stratified by SSB consumption are shown in Table 2. Compared with that in the girls, the percentage of participants consuming more than 120 mL/day was significantly higher and percentage of non-drinkers was much lower in boys. When analyzing the consumption by different age groups, the number of participants who consumed more than 120 mL/day reached 37.6% in those aged between 13 and 18 years and 14.5% in those aged between 6 and 12 years. Participants whose SSB drinking behaviors were allowed had a higher percentage of SSB consumption per day and a lower percentage of non-drinkers than those whose SSB drinking behaviors were prohibited by their teachers and schools. When the nutritional characteristics was analyzed, the differences of nutrition status and lipid profile were displayed among children with different SSB consumption levels; those who drank more than 120 mL/day had a significantly higher BMI, waist circumfer ence, and levels of TG and HDL-C than non-drinkers. No significant differences were observed in fruit and vegetable consumption, sedentary behavior, and fasting serum glucose levels between these groups.
Table 2. Characteristics of the participants by Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption levels.
Characteristics | SSBs intake |
P | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-drinker | ∼ 36 ml/day | ∼ 120 ml/day | ≥120 ml/day | ||||||
(n = 705) |
(n = 403) |
(n = 484) |
(n = 440) |
||||||
N or mean | % or SE | N or mean | % or SE | N or mean | % or SE | N or mean | % or SE | ||
Gender | < 0.001 | ||||||||
Boys | 329 | 32.5 | 173 | 17.1 | 231 | 22.8 | 280* | 27.6 | |
Girls | 376 | 36.9 | 230 | 22.6 | 253 | 24.8 | 160* | 15.7 | |
Age | < 0.001 | ||||||||
6–12 y | 545 | 38.9 | 329 | 23.5 | 325* | 23.2 | 203* | 14.5 | |
13–18 y | 160 | 25.4 | 74 | 11.7 | 159* | 25.2 | 237* | 37.6 | |
Teacher's attitude | < 0.001 | ||||||||
Allow | 89 | 25.4 | 47 | 13.4 | 101* | 28.9 | 113* | 32.3 | |
Prohibit | 608 | 36.6 | 352 | 21.2 | 378* | 7.8 | 324* | 19.5 | |
School's attitude | < 0.001 | ||||||||
Allow | 256 | 29.2 | 144 | 16.4 | 218 | 24.9 | 258* | 29.5 | |
Prohibit | 438 | 38.6 | 257 | 22.7 | 260 | 22.9 | 179* | 15.8 | |
Sedentary behavior (h/d) | 5.28 | 0.17 | 5.16 | 0.21 | 5.49 | 0.19 | 5.56 | 0.21 | 0.479 |
Fruit intake (portion/d) | 1.29 | 0.05 | 1.21 | 0.05 | 1.19 | 0.04 | 1.33 | 0.05 | 0.805 |
Vegetable intake (portion/d) | 2.19 | 0.06 | 1.87 | 0.07 | 1.88 | 0.06 | 2.08 | 0.07 | 0.091 |
Meat intake (portion/d) | 1.58 | 0.05 | 1.44 | 0.06 | 1.67 | 0.07 | 2.13 | 0.08 | < 0.001 |
BMI (kg/m2)a | 17.47 | 0.14 | 17.11 | 0.16 | 18.12* | 0.16 | 19.43* | 0.18 | < 0.001 |
WC (cm)b | 62.76 | 0.39 | 62.11 | 0.51 | 64.89 | 0.48 | 69.00 | 0.18 | < 0.001 |
TC (mmol/L)c | 4.25 | 0.03 | 4.34 | 004 | 4.29 | 0.04 | 4.18 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
LDL-C (mmol/L)d | 2.34 | 0.03 | 2.45* | 0.03 | 2.38 | 0.03 | 2.30 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
TG (mmol/L)e | 0.86 | 0.01 | 0.84 | 0.01 | 0.91 | 0.02 | 0.96 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
HDL-C (mmol/L)f | 1.38 | 0.01 | 1.43* | 0.01 | 1.38 | 0.02 | 1.32* | 0.31 | < 0.001 |
SBP (mmHg)g | 96.82 | 0.37 | 95.78 | 0.45 | 97.23 | 0.42 | 99.60 | 0.48 | < 0.001 |
DBP (mmHg)h | 61.56 | 0.28 | 61.37 | 0.20 | 61.76 | 0.30 | 63.36 | 0.34 | < 0.000 |
FSG (mmol/L)i | 4.57 | 0.03 | 4.55 | 0.02 | 4.62 | 0.03 | 4.61 | 0.03 | 0.227 |
BMI = Body mass index
WC = Waist circumference
TC = Total cholesterol
LDL-C = low-density lipid protein cholesterol
TG = Triglyceride
HDL = High-density lipid protein cholesterol
SBP = Systolic blood pressure
DBP = Diastolic blood pressure
FSG = Fasting serum glucose
The pair-wise difference was significant in contrast with that of the non-drinkers at 0.05 level.
SSB Consumption and Risk of Nutrition-Related Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Considering nutrition-related cardiovascular risk factor including obesity, dyslipidemia, pre-hypertension, and high fasting glucose levels as dependent variables and SSB consumption as the independent variable, the results of logistic analyses are displayed in Table 3. After adjustment of age, gender, physical activities, sleeping duration, sedentary behavior, and dietary information, children having more SSB per day had significantly higher rates of obesity. SSB consumption more than 120 mL/day was associated with a 108% higher risk of obesity [odds ratio (OR): 2.08, 95% CI: 1.21–3.54], 83% of abdominal obesity (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.25–2.69), and 70% of hypertriglyceridemia (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.02–3.06).
Table 3. Odds ratios of cardiovascular risk factors in children and adolescents in sugar-sweetened beverages of each Quartiles.
Quartiles of SSB intake |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-drinker |
∼ 36 ml/day |
||||||
Prevalence | Crude OR | Adjusted OR | Prevalence | Crude OR | Adjusted OR | ||
(%) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (%) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | ||
Obesity | 7.9 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 6.5 | 0.80 (0.49, 1.29) | 1.06 (0.59, 1.34) | |
Overweight | 10.2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.2 | 0.99 (0.66, 1.49) | 0.83 (0.49, 1.41) | |
Abdominal obesity | 18.9 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 18.1 | 0.95 (0.69, 1.31) | 1.00 (0.66, 1.50) | |
Hypertension | 10.2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.2 | 0.99 (0.66, 1.49) | 1.09 (0.64, 1.85) | |
Hypertriglyceridemia | 4.4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4.0 | 0.90 (0.50, 1.67) | 0.76 (0.37, 1.58) | |
Hypercholesterolemia | 10.5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 15.6 | 1.58 (1.10, 2.27) | 1.81 (1.15, 2.85) | |
High LDL-C Levelb | 7.0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9.9 | 1.48 (0.95, 2.28) | 1.62 (0.95, 2.77) | |
Low HDL-C Levelc | 12.6 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.7 | 0.83 (0.56, 1.22) | 0.96 (0.59, 1.58) | |
High FSG Leveld | 1.0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.0 | 1.00 (0.29, 3.44) | 1.31 (0.28, 5.98) | |
Dyslipidemia | 25.2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 26.8 | 1.08 (0.82, 1.43) | 1.24 (0.86, 1.76) | |
MetSe | 2.7 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.2 | 0.83 (0.37, 1.84) | 0.76 (0.26, 2.23) |
Quartiles of SSB intake |
Ptrend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
∼ 120 ml/day |
≥ 120 ml/day |
||||||
Prevalence | Crude OR | Adjusted OR | Prevalence | Crude OR | Adjusted OR | ||
(%) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (%) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | ||
Obesity | 9.3 | 1.19 (0.79, 1.79) | 1.08 (0.61, 1.90) | 11.6 | 1.51 (1.02, 2.27) | 2.08 (1.21, 3.54) | 0.024 |
Overweight | 10.7 | 1.05 (0.73, 1.54) | 1.25 (0.79, 1.99) | 14.8 | 1.52 (1.06, 2.18) | 1.56 (0.97, 2.52) | 0.033 |
Abdominal obesity | 21.7 | 1.19 (0.89, 1.59) | 1.18 (0.81, 1.72) | 25.5 | 1.50 (1.10, 1.95) | 1.83 (1.25, 2.69) | 0.006 |
Hypertension | 8.3 | 0.79 (0.53, 1.19) | 0.81 (0.47, 1.38) | 11.1 | 1.10 (0.75, 1.62) | 1.19 (0.70, 2.02) | 0.975 |
Hypertriglyceridemia | 4.8 | 1.60 (0.98, 2.59) | 1.18 (0.63, 2.20) | 7.3 | 1.71 (1.03, 2.84) | 1.70 (1.02, 3.06) | 0.045 |
Hypercholesterolemia | 13.0 | 1.28 (0.89, 1.83) | 1.42 (0.90, 2.24) | 9.5 | 0.90 (0.60, 1.34) | 1.04 (0.61, 1.79) | 0.746 |
High LDL-C Levelb | 7.2 | 1.04 (0.67, 1.64) | 1.11 (0.63, 1.95) | 7.0 | 1.02 (0.64, 1.62) | 1.17 (0.63, 2.18) | 0.870 |
Low HDL-C Levelc | 11.6 | 0.91 (0.63, 1.29) | 0.80 (0.50, 1.28) | 13.9 | 1.11 (0.79, 1.58) | 0.88 (0.55, 1.42) | 0.631 |
High FSG Leveld | 2.7 | 2.75 (1.09, 6.95) | 2.30 (0.65, 8.16) | 1.4 | 1.37 (0.46, 4.13) | 0.95 (0.20, 4.54) | 0.190 |
Dyslipidemia | 28.5 | 1.18 (0.91, 1.53) | 1.20 (0.86, 1.68) | 26.4 | 1.06 (0.81, 1.39) | 0.98 (0.68, 1.42) | 0.465 |
MetSe | 1.9 | 0.68 (0.31, 1.53) | 0.68 (0.25, 1.88) | 3.6 | 1.36 (0.69, 2.68) | 1.41 (0.59, 3.34) | 0.564 |
Adjusted OR have adjusted age, gender, physical activities, sedentary behavior and dietary information.
LDL-C = low-density lipid protein cholesterol
HDL-C = High-density lipid protein cholesterol.
FSG = Fasting serum glucose
MetS = Metabolic syndrome
Bold text: Significant OR was revealed at 0.05 level.
Discussion
Studies in adults have demonstrated that excessive SSB consumption would largely contribute to weight gain and elevated risk of cardiovascular disorders, such as hypertension, MetS, and diabetes24–26). However, studies regarding the relationship between SSB consumption and the risks of obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors were insufficient in Chinese children. In the present study, we analyzed daily SSB consumption in children living in South China and observed that excessive SSB consumption greatly contributed to increased BMI, WC and TG levels, increased risk of obesity (including abdominal obesity), and hypertriglyceridemia in children aged between 7 and 18 years.
The per capita daily SSB consumption was 90.45 ± 3.55 mL in this study. Compared with the data of other countries, daily SSB consumption was more than 63 mL in 9–14 years old Korean children, but much lower than 127 mL in 2–16 years old Australian children27). In addition, the current study suggested that 65.3% Chinese children had at least one SSB serving per week, while only 9.5% had one or more SSB servings per day. Nevertheless, the data from 2009 and 2010 reported that 64.3% youth had daily SSB consumption in the United States, which was much higher than the consumption in Chinese children28). These findings revealed that the SSB consumption by children was quite lower in Asian countries than in Western countries, which can be partly explained by regional disparities in the dietary pattern.
The present study has shown that over 120 mL SSB consumption per day would contribute to elevated values of BMI and WC. Besides, it was estimated that over 120 mL of SSB consumption per day would lead to an increase in the risk of obesity and abdominal obesity by 1.8 and 1.6 times, respectively, in Chinese children, which suggests a positive relationship between excessive SSB consumption and the risk of obesity. This finding was similar to a previous study in American children15). Additionally, previous studies in Chinese children have demonstrated that high and regular SSB consumption was associated with higher prevalence of obesity29), which is consistent with our findings. Because SSB are energy-dense foods with a low satiety and has an incomplete compensation for energy intake, it leads to excessive energy intake and weight gain11).
Meanwhile, convincing evidences in adults also suggested that SSB consumption was associated with other cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension25), type 2 diabetes24), MetS26), elevated TG level, and decreased HDL-C level30), implying that excessive SSB consumption enhances the risk of cardio-metabolic disorders. However, the conclusions were inconsistent in children and adolescents. In this study, the positive association between high SSB consumption and risk of hypertriglyceridemia was revealed. High SSB consumption was associated with an increased triglyceride and decreased HDL-C levels. These findings are consistent with a previous study conducted in children31). Most studies supported that when fructose is added to SSB, it would have a detrimental effect on metabolism and thus, increases cardio-metabolic risks32, 33). The underlying mechanism might be that increased intake of fructose enhances TG synthesis by providing glycerol and acyl in fructose catabolism34). However, no significant associations were observed between SSBs consumption and hypertension, MetS, and impaired fasting glucose levels in this study as well as in previous studies conducted in children. It is unclear whether SSB consumption leads to the occurrence of these risk factors in childhood.
Although SSB consumption in Chinese children was quite lower than that in American children in the current study, it might increase in the future with rapid economic development. Excessive SSB consumption would bring about serious health problems. Hence, preventive measures to reduce SSB consumption in Chinese children should be carried out. Approaches to limited access to SSB and advertising of SSB was adopted in several countries, such as Australia and Britain16, 35); however, there was a lack of valid policies in China. In this study, teachers' and schools' attitudes were strongly associated with SSB consumption of Chinese children. This could be explained by the fact that Chinese children spent most of their time at school and were largely influenced by the school, teacher, as well as their classmates. Consequently, advices from teachers and schools would be a great help for lifestyle establishment in Chinese children, apart from similar policies in other countries.
Several limitations in our study need to be mentioned. Firstly, because this was a cross-sectional study, the causal sequence underlying the relationships between iron metabolic parameters and dyslipidemia can hardly be detected. Secondly, the self-reported questionnaire were used to collect data on physical activities and dietary information of the previous week. Hence, the data might be affected by memory bias. However, using self-reported questionnaire to collect data is practical and eligible for application in a large population study among children. Also, given that the risk is affected by not only teachers' and schools' attitudes but also parents' attitudes, further study on the effect of parents' attitude is required.
Conclusions
In conclusion, excessive SSB consumption is positively associated with higher risks of obesity (including abdominal obesity) and hyper hypertriglyceridemia in children living in South China, which suggests that SSB consumption in children should be controlled. Besides, because teachers' and schools' attitudes may impact SSB consumption in Chinese children, promoting healthy lifestyle in schools may be effective in reducing obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors in these children.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
The authors declared no potential conflict of interest.
Funding
This project has been funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.81302424), Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No.2015A030313175), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No.20130171120056), Special Research Grant for Non-profit Public Service of the Ministry of Health of China (Grant No. 201202010), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in SYSU (Grant No. 15ykpy09). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1). Xi B, Bovet P, Hong YM, Zong X, Chiolero A, Kim HS, Zhang T, Zhao M: Recent blood pressure trends in adolescents from China, Korea, Seychelles and the United States of America, 1997–2012. Journal of hypertension, 2016; 34: 1948-1958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2). Han JC, Lawlor DA, Kimm SY: Childhood obesity. Lancet, 2010; 375: 1737-1748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3). Lee AM, Gurka MJ, DeBoer MD: Trends in Metabolic Syndrome Severity and Lifestyle Factors Among Adolescents. Pediatrics, 2016; 137: e20153177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4). Sun H, Ma Y, Han D, Pan CW, Xu Y: Prevalence and trends in obesity among China's children and adolescents, 1985–2010. PloS one, 2014; 9: e105469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5). Liang YJ, Xi B, Hu YH, Wang C, Liu JT, Yan YK, Xu T, Wang RQ: Trends in blood pressure and hypertension among Chinese children and adolescents: China Health and Nutrition Surveys 1991–2004. Blood pressure, 2011; 20: 45-53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6). Ding W, Dong H, Mi J: [Prevalence of dyslipidemia in Chinese children and adolescents: a Meta-analysis]. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxing-bingxue zazhi, 2015; 36: 71-77 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7). Fu JF, Liang L, Gong CX, Xiong F, Luo FH, Liu GL, Li P, Liu L, Xin Y, Yao H, Cui LW, Shi X, Yang Y, Chen LQ, Wei HY: Status and trends of diabetes in Chinese children: analysis of data from 14 medical centers. World journal of pediatrics: WJP, 2013; 9: 127-134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8). Ye P, Yan Y, Ding W, Dong H, Liu Q, Huang G, Mi J: [Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Chinese children and adolescents: a Meta-analysis]. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi, 2015; 36: 884-888 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9). Johns DJ, Lindroos AK, Jebb SA, Sjostrom L, Carlsson LM, Ambrosini GL: Dietary patterns, cardiometabolic risk factors, and the incidence of cardiovascular disease in severe obesity. Obesity, 2015; 23: 1063-1070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10). Scharf RJ, DeBoer MD: Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Children's Health. Annual review of public health, 2016; 37: 273-293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11). Pereira MA: Sugar-sweetened and artificially-sweetened beverages in relation to obesity risk. Advances in nutrition, 2014; 5: 797-808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12). Hu FB, Malik VS: Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: epidemiologic evidence. Physiology & behavior, 2010; 100: 47-54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13). Stanhope KL: Sugar consumption, metabolic disease and obesity: The state of the controversy. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences, 2016; 53: 52-67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14). Newby PK, Peterson KE, Berkey CS, Leppert J, Willett WC, Colditz GA: Beverage consumption is not associated with changes in weight and body mass index among low-income preschool children in North Dakota. J Am Diet Assoc, 2004; 104: 1086-1094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15). Ludwig DS, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL: Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet, 2001; 357: 505-508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16). Veerman JL, Sacks G, Antonopoulos N, Martin J: The Impact of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Health and Health Care Costs: A Modelling Study. PloS one, 2016; 11: e0151460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17). Chen Y, Ma L, Ma Y, Wang H, Luo J, Zhang X, Luo C, Wang H, Zhao H, Pan D, Zhu Y, Cai L, Zou Z, Yang W, Ma J, Jing J: A national school-based health lifestyles interventions among Chinese children and adolescents against obesity: rationale, design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial in China. BMC public health, 2015; 15: 210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18). Group of China Obesity Task F : [Body mass index reference norm for screening overweight and obesity in Chinese children and adolescents]. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi, 2004; 25: 97-102 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19). Ji CY: Report on childhood obesity in China (1)--body mass index reference for screening overweight and obesity in Chinese school-age children. Biomedical and environmental sciences: BES, 2005; 18: 390-400 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20). Ma GS, Ji CY, Ma J, Mi J, Yt Sung R, Xiong F, Yan WL, Hu XQ, Li YP, Du SM, Fang HY, Jiang JX: Waist circumference reference values for screening cardiovascular risk factors in Chinese children and adolescents. Biomedical and environmental sciences: BES, 2010; 23: 21-31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21). Cook S, Auinger P, Li C, Ford ES: Metabolic syndrome rates in United States adolescents, from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2002. The Journal of pediatrics, 2008; 152: 165-170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22). National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in C and Adolescents : The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 2004; 114: 555-576 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23). Yoon JM: Dyslipidemia in children and adolescents: when and how to diagnose and treat? Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition, 2014; 17: 85-92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24). Teshima N, Shimo M, Miyazawa K, Konegawa S, Matsumoto A, Onishi Y, Sasaki R, Suzuki T, Yano Y, Matsumoto K, Yamada T, Gabazza EC, Takei Y, Sumida Y: Effects of sugar-sweetened beverage intake on the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance: the Mihama diabetes prevention study. Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology, 2015; 61: 14-19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25). Jayalath VH, de Souza RJ, Ha V, Mirrahimi A, Blanco-Mejia S, Di Buono M, Jenkins AL, Leiter LA, Wolever TM, Beyene J, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ, Sievenpiper JL: Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and incident hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2015; 102: 914-921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26). Ejtahed HS, Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Azizi F: Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Is Associated with Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Endocrinology and metabolism, 2015; 30: 334-342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27). Clifton PM, Chan L, Moss CL, Miller MD, Cobiac L: Beverage intake and obesity in Australian children. Nutrition & metabolism, 2011; 8: 87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28). Kit BK, Fakhouri TH, Park S, Nielsen SJ, Ogden CL: Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999–2010. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2013; 98: 180-188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29). Shang XW, Liu AL, Zhang Q, Hu XQ, Du SM, Ma J, Xu GF, Li Y, Guo HW, Du L, Li TY, Ma GS: Report on childhood obesity in China (9): sugar-sweetened beverages consumption and obesity. Biomedical and environmental sciences: BES, 2012; 25: 125-132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30). Hernandez-Cordero S, Barquera S, Rodriguez-Ramirez S, Villanueva-Borbolla MA, Gonzalez de Cossio T, Dom marco JR, Popkin B: Substituting water for sugar-sweetened beverages reduces circulating triglycerides and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in obese but not in overweight Mexican women in a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of nutrition, 2014; 144: 1742-1752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31). Van Rompay MI, McKeown NM, Goodman E, Eliasziw M, Chomitz VR, Gordon CM, Economos CD, Sacheck JM: Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Is Positively Associated with Baseline Triglyceride Concentrations, and Changes in Intake Are Inversely Associated with Changes in HDL Cholesterol over 12 Months in a Multi-Ethnic Sample of Children. The Journal of nutrition, 2015; 145: 2389-2395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32). Richelsen B: Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardio-metabolic disease risks. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2013; 16: 478-484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33). Vos MB, Kaar JL, Welsh JA, Van Horn LV, Feig DI, Anderson CA, Patel MJ, Cruz Munos J, Krebs NF, Xanthakos SA, Johnson RK, American Heart Association Nutrition Committee of the Council on L, Cardiometabolic H, Council on Clinical C, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Y, Council on C, Stroke N, Council on E, Prevention, Council on Functional G, Translational B and Council on H : Added Sugars and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Children: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2016; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34). Basciano H, Federico L, Adeli K: Fructose, insulin resistance, and metabolic dyslipidemia. Nutrition & metabolism, 2005; 2: 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35). Elliott-Green A, Hyseni L, Lloyd-Williams F, Bromley H, Capewell S: Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging. BMJ open, 2016; 6: e011295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]