Abstract
Background
Early detection of the platelet storage lesion is still a challenge in transfusion practice. Using flow cytometry, we evaluated the appearance of the storage lesion, based on the expression of platelet activation markers, in total platelets and platelet populations.
Materials and methods
Buffy-coat-derived platelet concentrates were stored under standard conditions for 5 days. The expression of activation antigens CD42b, CD36, CD62p and phosphatidylserine on total platelets and populations of small, medium-sized and large platelets was analysed by flow cytometry on storage days 1, 3 and 5.
Results
The activation/lesion on total platelets and each platelet population was detected on storage day 3, by the increased expression of CD36. On the same day, increased expression of CD42b and CD62p was detected, but only on large platelets. Small and medium-sized platelets had increased CD62p expression only on day 5. Externalisation of phosphatidylserine was not detected.
Discussion
Evaluation of the level of expression of various activation markers on different platelet populations could be an additional valid analysis in cell quality control of platelet concentrates, and in the assessment of novel approaches to platelet concentrate manipulation.
Keywords: platelet storage lesion, platelet glycoproteins, flow cytometry, buffy coat
Introduction
Platelet transfusion therapy is widely used to prevent haemorrhage in patients with thrombocytopenia and platelet disorders occurring as the consequence of bone marrow failure in malignant or non-malignant haematological diseases, during radio- and chemotherapy for haematological malignancies and solid cancers, and in patients undergoing major surgical interventions1. Notwithstanding the great benefits, platelet transfusions are responsible for more than 25% of transfusion-related adverse events2. Platelet concentrates (PC) are currently prepared by two methods: (i) production of PC collected from single donors through an aphaeresis method, and (ii) from whole blood as platelet rich-plasma or buffy-coat-derived platelet concentrates (PC-BC). Once prepared, PC are stored in the liquid state at 22±2 °C, with permanent rotation or rocking. The average platelet life-span in vivo is 7–10 days3 and accordingly, PC have a short shelf-life of maximally 5 or 7 days. The quality of PC is profoundly affected by the collection/processing methods, ex vivo manipulation (such as pathogen reduction), and by contaminating leucocytes. Besides, during storage the number of platelets decreases, their morphology changes and their functions become impaired. Damage accumulated during PC storage, i.e. the platelet storage lesion, compromises the haemostatic function of PC and is also responsible for transfusion-related adverse effects2,4–6.
Early and precise detection of the platelet storage lesion is still a subject of great interest in transfusion practice. Various laboratory tests are used to monitoring the quality of stored platelets through analysis of their morphology, biochemistry and functions4,7. Although liquid stored platelets show evidence of activation, they are effective in stopping or preventing haemorrhage even when there is not an evident increase in their numbers in peripheral blood, highlighting that there is a lack of appropriate analytical techniques to study insufficiently defined functional characteristics of platelet8. Although it is not routinely used, flow cytometry analysis of the expression of major platelet glycoproteins (GPIb, GPIIb-III, GPIX) responsible for adhesive and cohesive functions of platelets, i.e. initial adhesion of platelets to the subendothelial matrix, platelet spreading on the subendothelium and aggregation3,9, can be used to estimate these cells’ haemostatic function4,10. Activated platelets release the content of their intracellular granules and so their activation can be estimated by measuring the level of proteins released from the granules into the extracellular fluid7. At the same time, flow cytometry detection of intra- and extracellular antigens (CD63, CD62p, CD36, sCD40L) specific for platelets granules, and negatively charged phospholipids on the external surface of platelet membranes, can be an important additional tool for analysis of platelet activation3,10. Moreover, it has been shown that changes in the expression of platelet surface molecules detected by flow cytometry are correlated with the changes in platelet function parameters determined by standard laboratory tests, confirming that flow cytometry can be used in the quality control of PC8,11–13.
Platelets are not an identical set of cells, but comprise several populations of different ages and in different functional states3. Platelet populations can be identified and analysed separately by flow cytometry14. In this study we analysed the impact of 5 days of liquid storage on the expression of major glycoproteins and activation markers by PC-BC platelet populations.
Material and methods
Preparation of buffy-coat-derived platelet concentrates
Blood samples were taken from seven randomly selected male, 19- to 27-year old, blood donors, with normal clinical data, who had not taken preparations of acetylsalicylic acid in the preceding 7 days. Blood units (450±45 mL) were collected into quadruple plastic bag systems (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with citrate-phosphate-dextrose, saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol. The time to collect each investigated unit was less than 6 minutes. The buffy coats were isolated from whole blood, no later than 2 hours after the collection, by 10 minutes of centrifugation at 3,890 g (Hettich-Roto Silenta RP, Hettich Tuttlingen, Germany) and additionally separated with an automatic cell processor EX-30 (Terumo Corporation). By further centrifugation at 377 g for 5 minutes and processing, PC were obtained from the buffy coats. On average, a PC-BC contained 50–60 mL of platelets suspended in autologous plasma, at a concentration of 471±274×109/L15. The PC-BC were kept for 5 days in a Cooled Orbital Incubator thermostat (Gallenkamp, Loughborough, United Kingdom) at the temperature of 22±2 °C with permanent horizontal shaking. Platelet samples were taken aseptically (with syringes) immediately after the PC-BC had been prepared (day 1), and on days 3 and 5 of storage.
Platelet count and platelet morphological score
The platelet counts were determined by an analyser (Technicon H-3 System, Technicon, Tarrytown, NY, USA), while the morphological properties of platelets were studied with a phase-contrast microscope (Polyvar, Austria). The values of the platelet morphological score (PMS) were determined according to the percentage of platelet having different shapes. In each PC-BC unit, 100 platelets were analysed. Numerical values assigned to different morphological types were: balloons=0, dendrites=1, spheres=2 and disks=4.
Hypotonic shock response test
Platelet viability was assessed by the hypotonic shock response (HSR) test as described by Odink and co-workers16. The whole-blood aggregometer model 560 (Chrono-Log Corporation, Havertown, PA, USA) was calibrated by measuring light transmittance with platelet-poor plasma. A gently mixed suspension of PC-BC in platelet-poor plasma (PPP, 200 μL) was prepared and stirred by a magnetic bar in two aggregometer cuvettes for 10 minutes. Next, 200 μL of distilled water were added to the first cuvette containing the PC-BC and PPP. After adding the water, the decrease of the optical density at 610 nm (OD610) was followed and recorded until it reached its lowest level and then for the subsequent 10 minutes, as the OD610 rose again. An identical OD610 recording was made in parallel for the sample in the second cuvette, to which isotonic saline was added instead of water. The percentage of HSR was determined using the formula:
Activity of lactate dehydrogenase
The cell lysis/damage in PC-BC during 5 days of liquid storage was estimated on the basis of the level of the extracellular activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). In brief, supernatants of aseptically taken PC-BC samples were obtained by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 1,500 g. The level of LDH in the supernatants was determined on a Hitachi 912 automatic analyser (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) with the commercially available spectrophotometric Roche Hitachi-LDH Assay (Roche Diagnostics).
Platelet aggregation
Platelet aggregation was measured by Born’s optical method17, using the laboratory aggregometer (BCT-Behring Coagulation Timer; DADE-Behring, Marburg, Germany). The samples were warmed to 37 °C and stirred by a magnetic bar. The aggregometer was calibrated by measuring light transmittance through a turbid mixture of PC-BC re-suspended in autologous plasma at the concentration of 2.5×105/mL, and then by measuring light transmittance through PPP. Light transmittance through the PC-BC suspension was marked as 0%, and that through PPP as 100%.
One of the following agonists was then added to the PC-BC samples: 20 μM adenosine diphosphate (ADP), 200 μg/mL collagen, 10 μM epinephrine (all from DADE-Behring) and 150 μg/mL ristocetin, (Helena Biosciences Europe, Sunderland, England). The aggregation monitoring time was 10 minutes. After adding an agonist for aggregation to the PC-BC sample, light transmittance increased because the suspension became less turbid as aggregation proceded. The maximum level of aggregation, expressed as % of aggregation, was determined using the formula:
Detection of soluble platelet release markers
Concentrations of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), soluble P-selectin, soluble annexin, platelet factor 4 (PF4), and β-thromboglobulin (β-TG) in supernatants of PC-BC (obtained after the precipitation of platelets by centrifugation, and stored at −70 °C) were determined with commercially available enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). The Quantikine Human TGF-β1 Immunoassay DB 100 (assay range: 31.20–2,000 pg/mL) was obtained from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA. The human soluble P-selectin ELISA (assay range: 2.19–140 ng/mL) was obtained from Bender MedSystems Diagnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria. The Zymutest Annexin V (assay range: 0.1–120 ng/mL) was obtained from Hyphen BioMed, Andresy, France. Enzygnost PF4 (assay range: 2–60 ng/mL) was from Behringwerke AG, Marburg, Germany, while the Asserachrom β-Thromboglobulin test (assay range: 10–40 IU/mL) was produced by Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres Cedex, France. All analyses were performed in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions. Optical density was measured in a 96-well plate reader BioTek ELx800 (Absorbance reader, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).
Flow cytometric analysis
For analysis of the expression of platelet surface markers, we used the following fluorochrome (FITC or PE) conjugated monoclonal antibodies: BD Pharmingen CD42a (anti-GPIX/CD42a), (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA), PM6/248 (anti-GPIIb-IIIa/CD41) (Serotec, Oxford, United Kingdom), CLB-MB45 (anti-GPIbα/CD42b), CLB-AK-6 (anti-GP140 P-selectin/ CD62p), CLB-gran/12 (anti-GP53/CD63) and CLB-IVC7 (anti-GPIV/CD36) (CLB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands).
The samples of PC-BC were taken using a sterile syringe after 2 hours of standing on a shaker (day 1) and on the third and fifth day of storage. Cells were counted with an automatic blood cell counter and a volume containing 25×106 platelets was mixed with 200 μL of 1% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes, for fixation. Fixed cells were re-suspended in 1 mL phosphate-buffered saline. Monoclonal antibodies were added in 100 μL of the fixed cell suspensions containing 2.5×105 fixed platelets, and incubated for 30 minutes, in the dark, at room temperature. Once the incubation had finished, platelets were washed by centrifugation, re-suspended in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.3 mM EDTA and 0.1% bovine serum albumin, and analysed using a flow cytometer (Epics XL flow cytometer, Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL, USA). The flow cytometer was subjected to the routine daily setup procedures, verification of its optical alignment together with fluidic stability (with FLOW-CHECK™ 770 fluorospheres) and standardisation of detector functions (with FLOW-SET™ 770 fluorospheres), all contained in the setup kit (PC7 setup kit, Beckman Coulter; Coulter Corporation). Instrument linearity was checked with an Immuno-Brite™ Standards kit (Beckman Coulter). Colour compensation was verified with the QuickCOMPkit (Beckman Coulter). Platelets were identified according to their forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) characteristics. As described by Di Pumpo and co-workers14, for every sample an electronic gate was drawn around total platelets and the large, medium-sized and small platelet populations. The results were shown as FSC/logSSC histograms and fluorescence intensity/cell count histograms. Values of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI, i.e. the number of the analysed molecules per cell) and the percentage of platelets expressing the analysed antigens were also given.
The externalisation of phosphatidylserine was analysed based on the binding of annexin V. Platelets were diluted ten-fold in fresh 10 mM HEPES buffer with 2.5 mM CaCl2, immediately before the analysis. The diluted platelets (5 μL) were lightly mixed with 250 μL of annexin V-FITC solution (1 mg/mLAnnexin V-Fluos, Roche Diag. Mannheim, Germany) in annexin V binding buffer (10mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4). After in incubation for 5 minutes at room temperature in the dark, 250 μL of annexin V binding buffer were added, and the cells were analysed immediately. The results are presented as MFI values and as the percentage of positive platelets.
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as the mean±standard deviation (SD). The statistical significance of differences between two groups was determined by the paired two-tailed Student’s t-test. All statistical analyses were carried out using the OriginPro 8 programme (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Differences in p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Effect of 5 days of liquid storage on basic indices of platelet quality
Data in Table I show that the platelet count in the PC-BC analysed remained stable over the 5-day storage period. However, the decreasing PMS values indicate that the number of disc-shaped platelets progressively decreased. The level of extracellular LDH, a marker of platelet damage/lysis9, was low on day 1, but increased on day 3, and remained unchanged until the end of storage. The results of the HSR test show that the percentage of PC-BC platelets with preserved capacity to recover shape after hypotonic stress decreased progressively during storage. Decreased platelet aggregation was detected on day 3, after which stayed aggregation remained unchanged until day 5.
Table I.
Influence of 5 days of liquid storage on in vitro parameters of platelet quality in buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates.
Day | Basic PC indices | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Number (109/L) | PMS | LDH (U/L) | HSR (%) | ||
1 | 471±274 | 364±24 | 139±26 | 69±15 | |
3 | 421±230 | 288±17* | 212±17* | 49±12* | |
5 | 411±222 | 138±16 †,‡ | 234±25 † | 36±11 †,‡ | |
| |||||
Day | Platelet aggregation (%) | ||||
| |||||
ADP | Epinephrine | Collagen | Ristocetin | ||
| |||||
1 | 71±14 | 63±19 | 67±17 | 85±7 | |
3 | 33±10* | 30±6* | 35±15* | 75±7* | |
5 | 31±9 † | 29±6† | 27±10† | 76±12† | |
| |||||
Day | Soluble mediators | ||||
| |||||
TGF-β (ng/mL) | P selectin (ng/mL) | Annexin (ng/mL) | PF4 (μg/mL) | β-TG (IU/mL) | |
| |||||
1 | 2.0±0.3 | 29±7 | 0.7±0.2 | 128±35 | 151±81 |
3 | 3.3±1.5 | 31±12 | 1.4±0.5 | 438±244 | 760±295* |
5 | 7.0±4.4 | 53±29 | 3.9±1.8 †,‡ | 1,385±383 †,‡ | 1,346±249 †,‡ |
PMS: platelet morphological score; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; HSR: hypotonic shock response; TGF-β: transforming growth factor β; PF4: platelet factor-4; β-TG: β thromboglobulin. The data are shown as the mean±SD of seven platelet concentrate units. Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between:
the 1st and 3rd days;
the 1st and the 5th days;
the 3rd and the 5th days.
Effect of 5 days of liquid storage on the concentration of soluble mediators in platelet concentrates
The levels of TGF-β and P-selectin in the PC-BC supernatants were unchanged during the 5-day storage period. Increased annexin and PF4 concentrations were detected on day 5. The concentration of β-TG increased on day 3 of storage, and continued to rise until the end of storage.
Flow cytometry follow-up of the influence of 5 days of liquid storage on platelets
As shown in Figure 1, flow cytometry was used to study the PC-BC during the entire storage period, focusing on three populations: small, medium-sized and large platelets. On day 1 the populations of small, medium-sized and large platelets accounted for 67±6%, 22±3% and 8±3% of the total number of platelets, respectively. After 3 days of storage we detected a significant decrease in the number of medium-sized platelets only. After 5 days of storage there were significant reductions in the numbers of medium-sized and large platelets, while the number of small platelets increased significantly.
Figure 1.
The influence of 5 days of liquid storage on platelet subpopulations in buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates (PC-BC).
(A) FCS/SSC diagrams of an individual PC-BC. (B) Cumulative results of seven PC-BC. Horizontal brackets indicate a statistically significant change in the percentage of platelets belonging to a particular platelet population; ***p<0.001; **p<0.01.
The expression of major platelet glycoproteins (CD42a, CD41) and platelet activation markers (CD42b, CD36, CD62p, and externalised phosphatidylserine) was analysed. Representative fluorescence intensity/ cell count histograms showing changes in the platelet expression of CD41 and CD62p during storage are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The expression of platelet membrane antigens CD41 and CD62p in buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates (PC-BC) during 5 days of liquid storage - flow cytometry analysis.
Cell count/fluorescence intensity histograms are of one representative PC-BC. Grey plot: day 1; solid line: day 3; dashed line: day 5. The total platelets (plt) and platelet subpopulations with large, medium an small volume were identified based on FSC/log SSC values as it was shown in Figure 1.
Numeric flow cytometry data (% of positive cells and MFI values) for total platelets and the platelet populations are given in Table II and Table III, respectively.
Table II.
Influence of 5 days of liquid storage on the membrane expression of major glycoproteins and activation markers on total platelets in buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates.
Marker | Day | Positive platelets (%) | MFI |
---|---|---|---|
CD41 / GPIIb-IIIa | 1 | 99 ±1 | 27±3 |
3 | 97±2§ | 23±3* | |
5 | 98±1† | 21±2 †,‡ | |
CD42a / GPIX | 1 | 99±1 | 6.2±0.7 |
3 | 96±3* | 8.0±1.2* | |
5 | 97±2|| | 8.1±0.8 † | |
CD42b / GPIbα | 1 | 96±3 | 5.5±2.4 |
3 | 95±3* | 6.6±1.4 | |
5 | 96±1 | 6.4±0.9 | |
CD36 / GPIV | 1 | 91±4 | 9±2 |
3 | 94±3* | 13±4* | |
5 | 94±2† | 19±5†,‡ | |
CD62p / P selectin / GP/140 | 1 | 7±2 | 2.4±0.5 |
3 | 8±2 | 2.7±0.3 | |
5 | 15±5†,‡ | 2.5±0.3 | |
Phosphatidylserine | 1 | 4.4±0.9 | 60±23 |
3 | 6.7±3.6 | 45±21 | |
5 | 5.5±2.0 | 40±19‡ |
The data are shown as the mean±SD of seven platelet concentrate units. Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between:
the 1st and 3rd days,
the 1st and 5th days, and
the 3rdand 5th days.
Difference close to statistical significance (0.05<p<0.06) between:
the 1st and 3rd days and
the 3rd and 5th days. MFI: mean fluorescence intensity.
Table III.
Influence of 5 days of liquid storage on the expression of major glycoproteins and activation markers on platelet populations in buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates.
Marker | Day | Positive platelets (%) | Mean fluorescence intensity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Small | Medium | Large | Small | Medium | Large | ||
CD41 / GPIIb-IIIa | 1 | 98±1 | 99±1 | 95±2 | 25±3 | 33±4 | 44±6 |
3 | 96±3§ | 95±6 | 92±8 | 22±3* | 27±4* | 35±6* | |
5 | 98±1 | 97±1† | 91±4† | 20±2†,‡ | 28±3† | 45±9‡ | |
CD42a / GPIX | 1 | 98±1 | 98±1 | 96±2 | 5.9±0.7 | 7.3±0.8 | 9.1±1.0 |
3 | 94±4* | 94±7§ | 90±10 | 7.2±1.5* | 9.6±1.7* | 12.4±3.1* | |
5 | 96±1† | 96±1† | 91±5† | 7.8±0.5† | 10.9±0.9† | 17.0±2.7†,‡ | |
CD42b /GPIbα | 1 | 96±3 | 98±2 | 95±3 | 5.1±2.2 | 6.9±3.1 | 9.4±4.1 |
3 | 94±4* | 94±6§ | 92±8 | 6.1±1.3 | 8.6±1.8§ | 12.2±2.7* | |
5 | 95±1 | 96 ±2 | 92±4† | 6.1±0.9 | 9.0±1.2 | 13.8±1.9† | |
CD36 / GPIV | 1 | 94±2 | 97±2 | 94±4 | 8±2 | 11±2 | 17±4 |
3 | 95±3* | 97±2* | 96 ±2 | 11±3* | 16±5* | 24±7* | |
5 | 96±1† | 98±1† | 97±2 | 16±4†,‡ | 23±6†,‡ | 46±11†,‡ | |
CD62p / P selectin / GP 140 | 1 | 8±2 | 9 ±1 | 11±3 | 2.5±0.4 | 3.6±0.6 | 5.4±3.1 |
3 | 9±3 | 9 ±3 | 8±2* | 2.9±0.4* | 4.2±1.7 | 5.6±2.8 | |
5 | 18±6†,‡ | 20±8†,‡ | 25±10†,‡ | 2.5±0.3‡ | 3.5±0.6 | 6.0±4.5 | |
Phosphatidylserine | 1 | 7.3±3.5 | 2.2±0.8 | 1.6±1.1 | 66±25 | 56±24 | 52±22 |
3 | 9.8±5.4 | 3.9±2.2§ | 4.5±3.8 | 48±21 | 46±15 | 46±18 | |
5 | 8.7±4.7 | 3.0±1.6 | 2.6±2.0 | 42±21‡ | 50±20 | 76±29 |
The data are shown as the mean±SD of seven platelet concentrate units. Platelet populations were identified as shown in Figure 1. Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between: (*) the 1st and 3rd days, (†) the 1st and 5th days, and (‡) the 3rd and 5th days. Difference close to statistical significance (0.05<p<0.06) between: (§) the 1st and 3rd days.
The results show that the expression of analysed platelet surface molecules on total platelets, as a rule, reflects their expression on small platelets but differs from that on large platelets. Thus, the expression (MFI) of major platelet glycoprotein CD41 (GPIIb-IIIa) on total platelets decreased progressively during the 5 days of storage, mirrored by a progressive decrease of CD41 expression on small platelets. In contrast, the expression of CD41 on medium-sized and large platelets was decreased on day 3 but then remained unchanged until the end of storage on medium-sized platelets, but increased on large platelets, so that the MFI value of CD41 expressed on large platelets on day 5 of storage reached the level recorded on day 1.
The expression of CD42a (GPIX) on total platelets increased significantly on day 3, and stayed unchanged until day 5. The same pattern of CD42a expression was detected for small and medium-sized platelets, whereas on large platelets the expression continued to increase until the end of storage. The expression of CD42b (a major platelet glycoprotein but also an activation antigen) on total platelets, as well as on small and medium-sized platelets, remained unchanged during storage. However, CD42b expression on large platelets was increased on day 3, and remained at the same level until day 5.
When the percentages of platelets expressing major glycoproteins were analysed, it was found that the percentages of CD42a- and CD42b-positive total platelets were slightly, but significantly, reduced only on day 3, whereas on the day 5 the percentages had returned to their initial values. The same pattern of CD42b reactivity was shown for the populations of small and medium-sized platelets, while a decrease in the percentage of CD42b-positive large platelets was detected only on day 5. The CD42a reactivity for platelet populations differed from that of total platelets. Thus, a significantly reduced number of CD42a-positive small platelets was detected on day 3 and reduced numbers of CD42a-positive medium-sized and large platelets was detected on day 5. A decreased percentage of CD41-positive cells was detected among the total platelets and populations of medium-sized and large platelets. No significant change was detected in the percentage of CD41-positive small platelets during the storage conditions applied storage.
Platelet activation during the 5 days of storage was assessed based on the expression of CD36, CD62p activation markers and the externalisation of phosphatidylserine. The results show that the applied storage conditions induced no externalisation of phosphatidylserine on total platelets or on any of the platelet populations. No significant increase in the percentage of CD62p-positive total platelets was detected before day 5. The same pattern of expression was observed for small and medium-sized platelets, whereas an increased percentage of large CD62p-positive platelets was detectable already on day 3. The increased percentage of CD36-positive total platelets was detected on day 3, reflecting the increased CD36 positivity on small and medium-sized platelets. The percentage of CD36-positive cells among the population of large platelets did not change during storage. The level of CD36 expression (MFI) increased progressively during storage and the pattern of expression was the same for total platelets and the platelet populations.
Discussion
In the Institute for Transfusiology and Haemobiology of the Military Medical Academy, PC-BC are prepared as pools of six individual donations. In this study we analysed the changes in the expression of surface membrane markers on platelets from seven individual PC-BC during 5 days of liquid storage at 22±2 °C. Using laboratory tests recommended by the Food and Drug Administration18,19 we showed that the values of basic parameters of platelet quality detected in this study were within the norms proposed by Serbian National Regulations20.
Flow cytometry is a sensitive method, used for single-cell level analysis of activation and reactivity of circulating platelets, for the diagnosis of inherited and acquired platelet disorders, and for monitoring the effects of antiplatelet agents7. Flow cytometry has also been considered as an appropriate method for evaluating the quality of PC after whole blood processing, filtering, liquid state storage, or cryopreservation8,21–23. When flow cytometry analysis of whole blood is performed, it is recommended that platelets are identified (i.e., gated) based on their scatter properties and reactivity with antibodies to some pan-platelet glycoproteins24. Other blood cells are present in trace amounts in PC15,25 and platelets could be gated based on their forward scatter and side scatter properties4,26. In our study we used this approach to identify platelets and then confirmed their identity by their expression of pan-platelet glycoproteins CD41 (GPIIb-IIIa) and CD42a (GPIX). Flow cytometric analysis of total platelets showed increased expression of the CD36 activation marker on day 3 of storage.
The CD62p activation marker was detectable on day 5, whereas the externalisation of phosphatidylserine was not detected. Activation of platelets in our PC-BC on day 3 of storage was also confirmed by standard tests. Our results are in accordance with the results of other researchers showing that expression of platelet activation markers correlates with platelet activation parameters detected by standard laboratory tests, confirming that flow cytometry can be used as an additional method for the quality control of PC8,11–13. Furthermore, flow cytometry is less labour-intensive and less time-consuming than standard laboratory tests and our results and the results of our colleagues confirm that in certain conditions, flow cytometry might be a significant assurance for monitoring platelet storage lesion.
The quality of PC-BC can be influenced by many factors: the method used to separate the platelets from whole blood, temperature, transport time, bag disposal, bag agitation device, pre-storage, centrifugation, pooling, etc. According to Garraud and co-workers2 there are 5 million combinations of individual parameters that can influence PC-BC quality. It is, therefore very difficult to compare our results directly with those of other research groups11,27–33 and we think that each blood transfusion centre should establish its own “in-house” reference range for the assessment of platelet storage lesion (as proposed by Daskalakis and co-workers34 for the analysis of platelets of patients with bleeding diatheses).
Platelets are not homogenous cells, and based on their size, i.e. forward scatter properties, we identified, and separately analysed three populations of large, medium-sized and small platelets. This type of flow cytometric analysis of platelet populations was previously performed in a study of inherited platelet disorders14. The results of our study show that MFI values for all analysed surface molecules increased as follows: small platelets < medium platelets < large platelets. We assume that the number of molecules of the analysed markers per surface area is the same in all populations of platelets and that MFI values increase with the size of the platelets, so the results obtained were those expected. It has been suggested that MFI values could be expressed as a normalised fluorescence ratio to volume (i.e., FSC value)14 in order to eliminate the influence of platelet size on the overall fluorescence intensity. We did not express fluorescence intensity as the MFI/FCS ratio either for total platelets or for the platelet populations, because the influence of the volume on fluorescence intensity was minimised by determining, for each of the analysed PC, a specific FSC/SSC gating parameter of total platelets and platelet populations on day 1 and keeping it at the same level during analysis on storage days 3 and 5. By keeping the FCS constant we analysed platelets of exactly the same size during the entire storage period and recorded the MFI value that reflected the overall fluorescence intensity.
To our knowledge, our group and that of Södergren and co-workers35 are the first to use this approach in the analysis of platelet storage lesion. According to Smyth (2014)3, young platelets, recently released by megakaryocytes, are larger and denser, and undergo remodelling in the circulation, in part by shedding some of their surface components. The storage time-dependent decrease in the number of large platelets in PC-BC, shown in our study, confirms the in vitro ageing. Södergren and co-workers35 showed that stored platelets (prepared by aphaeresis) undergo further fragmentation, but this phenomenon cannot be detected before the 12th day of storage. They also proposed recording fragmentation into platelet subpopulations as a potential marker for the platelet storage lesion. Our results show that, based on the expression of CD42b and CD62P on platelet populations, signs of activation can be detected much earlier. Thus, changing levels of CD42b and CD62P expression were not detected on small and medium-sized platelets. However, their increased expression and, therefore, activation was detected on large platelets on day 3 of storage.
In our study, we did not find increased expression of phosphatidylserine on stored platelets or their subpopulations, in accordance with the results of Södergren and co-workers35, who did not find different expression of phosphatidylserine or lysosomeassociated membrane protein-1 on populations of stored platelet (prepared by aphaeresis) in resting state but only after stimulation with different platelet agonists.
Conclusions
In the last few years there have been many attempts to analyse the platelet storage lesion by various highly sophisticated physicochemical methods36–46. Although these methods have provided very important data on platelet biology their use in routine haematological diagnosis or control of PC quality is still unlikely. Standard laboratory tests (platelet count, PMS, HSR, aggregometry, swirling, pH measurement, PO2, PCO2, extracellular LDH activity, soluble platelet release markers) and flow cytometry remain powerful and widely available techniques for platelet analysis17. We believe that our results and the results of other authors14,35 confirm that flow cytometric analysis of platelet populations could be an additional method for routine quality control of liquid-stored platelets, but also for testing new additive solutions, cryoconservation protocols and cryoprotectants. This study shows that expression of activation markers (CD42b and CD62P) in stored PC can be detected only in the population of large platelets. Expression of activation markers analysed in this study and expression of other markers such as CD63, activated CD41 (GPIIb-IIIa), and the mediator of vascular inflammation sCD40L47 in specific platelet populations were shown to be useful in early/timely detection of the platelet storage lesion and prevention of serious adverse transfusion effects including transfusion-related acute lung injury. Further studies are warranted to investigate a possible correlation between flow cytometric analysis of platelet populations, PMS and the haemostatic response of the platelet transfusion recipient.
Acknowledgements
The Authors thank Dr. Patrizia Noris (Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy) and Dr. Cesare Perotti and Dr. Claudia Del Fante (Immunohaematology and Transfusion Service, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy), for their help and useful advice on the platelet flow cytometric investigations.
Ristocetin was a gift from Helena Biosciences Europe, Sunderland, England. Asserachrom β-Thromboglobulin was a gift from Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres Cedex, France. Human sP-selectin ELISA was a gift from Bender MedSystems Diagnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria. Zymutest Annexin V was gift from Hyphen BioMed, Andresy, France. TGF-β1 Immunoassay DB 100 was a gift from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA. BD Pharmingen CD42a monoclonal antibody was donated by Mrs. Dragica Paunovic from Terumo, Belgium. CLB-MB45, CLB-AK-6, CLB-gran/12, and CLB-IVC7 monoclonal antibodies were a gift from CLB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PM6/248 monoclonal antibody was a gift from Serotec, Oxford, UK, and Annexin V-FITC was a gift from Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany.
Footnotes
Funding and resources
This work was supported by the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia (Grant VMA/06-10B.20) and by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant N. 175062).
Authorship contributions
DVu designed the research, performed experiments, analysed data, and prepared the manuscript; VI analysed data, prepared and wrote the manuscript; DVo and VS performed experiments and analysed data; MT critically read the manuscript; BB oversaw the project and assisted with preparation of the manuscript.
The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Stroncek DF, Rebulla P. Platelet transfusions. Lancet. 2007;370:427–38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61198-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Garraud O, Cognasse F, Tissot JD, et al. Improving platelet transfusion safety: biomedical and technical considerations. Blood Transfus. 2016;14:109–22. doi: 10.2450/2015.0042-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smyth SS. Platelet structure and function in hemostasis and thrombosis. In: Greer JP, Arber DA, Glader B, et al., editors. Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business; 2014. pp. 389–410. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tynngård N. Preparation, storage and quality control of platelet concentrates. Transfus Apher Sci. 2009;41:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van der Meer PF. Platelet concentrates, from whole blood or collected by apheresis? Transfus Apher Sci. 2013;48:129–31. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gardiner EE, Andrews RK. Platelet receptor expression and shedding: glycoprotein Ib-IX-V and glycoprotein VI. Transfus Med Rev. 2014;28:56–60. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pakala R, Waksman R. Currently available methods for platelet function analysis: advantages and disadvantages. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2011;12:312–22. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2010.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang C, Mody M, Herst R, et al. Flow cytometric analysis of platelet function in stored platelet concentrates. Transfus Sci. 1999;20:129–39. doi: 10.1016/s0955-3886(99)00022-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cleverly DC. Platelet function in hemostasis and thrombosis. In: Greer JP, Arber DA, Glader B, et al., editors. Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business; 2014. pp. 411–27. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Michelson AD, Barnard MR, Krueger LA, et al. Evaluation of platelet function by flow cytometry. Methods. 2000;21:259–70. doi: 10.1006/meth.2000.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Metcalfe P, Williamson LM, Reutelingsperger CP, et al. Activation during preparation of therapeutic platelets affects deterioration during storage: a comparative flow cytometric study of different production methods. Br J Haematol. 1997;98:86–95. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.1572983.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang J, Yi X, Liu M, et al. Correlation between the in vitro functionality of stored platelets and the cytosolic esterase-induced fluorescence intensity with CMFDA. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0138509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tynngård N, Wallstedt M, Södergren AL, et al. Platelet adhesion changes during storage studied with a novel method using flow cytometry and protein-coated beads. Platelets. 2015;26:177–85. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2014.891728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Di Pumpo M, Noris P, Pecci A, et al. Defective expression of GPIb/IX/V complex in platelets from patients with May-Hegglin anomaly and Sebastian syndrome. Haematologica. 2002;87:943–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vučetić D. PhD thesis. Military Medical Academy; Belgrade: 2007. [In Serbian.] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Odink J, Brand A. Platelet preservation v. survival, serotonin uptake velocity, and response to hypotonic stres of fresh and cryopreserved platelets. Transfusion. 1977;17:203–39. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1977.17377196351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Born GV. Aggregation of blood platelets by adenosine diphosphate and its reversal. Nature. 1962;194:927–9. doi: 10.1038/194927b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Murphy MF, Pamphilon DH. Practical Transfusion Medicine. 1st ed. Oxford; Chichester; Hoboken: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Michelson AD. Platelets. 3rd ed. London; Waltham; San Diego: Elsevier Inc; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ministry of Health of Republic of Serbia. Guide to the Preparation, Use and quality Assurance of Blood Components. 16th edition. [In Serbian: Vodič za pripremu, korišćenje i obezbeđenje komponenata krvi]. 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Balint B, Vučetić D, Trajković-Lakić Z, et al. Quantitative, functional, morphological and ultrastructural recovery of platelets as predictor for cryopreservation efficacy. Haematologia (Budap) 2002;32:363–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Balint B, Paunović D, Vučetić D, et al. Controlled-rate versus uncontrolled-rate freezing as predictors for platelet cryopreservation efficacy. Transfusion. 2006;46:230–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00706.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Balint B, Vucic M, Todorovic M, et al. Radically reduced ex vivo cell activation by using “in-line” filtered whole blood as a source of platelet concentrate. Blood Transfus. 2014;12:440–2. doi: 10.2450/2014.0225-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Velzen JF, Laros-van Gorkom BA, Pop GA, et al. Multicolor flow cytometry for evaluation of platelet surface antigens and activation markers. Thromb Res. 2012;130:92–8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Milenković Lj, Balint B, Škaro-Milić A, et al. [The role and morphology of thrombocyte concentrates prepared from a buffy coat]. Vonosanit Pregl. 1995;52:18–24. [In Serbian.] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Beard MJ, Jeewa Z, Bashir S, et al. Comparison of platelet activation in platelet concentrates measured by flow cytometry or ADVIA 2120. Vox Sang. 2011;101:122–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2011.01469.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sandgren P, Hansson M, Gulliksson H, et al. Storage of buffy-coat-derived platelets in additive solutions at 4 degrees C and 22 degrees C: flow cytometry analysis of platelet glycoprotein expression. Vox Sang. 2007;93:27–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00912.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sandgren P, Callaert M, Shanwell A, et al. Storage of platelet concentrates from pooled buffy coats made of fresh and overnight-stored whole blood processed on the novel Atreus 2C+ system: in vitro study. Transfusion. 2008;48:688–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01593.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sandgren P, Hild M, Sjödin A, et al. Storage of buffy-coat-derived platelets in additive solutions: in vitro effects on platelets prepared by the novel TACSI system and stored in plastic containers with different gas permeability. Vox Sang. 2010;99:341–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Costa EJ, Guimarães TM, de Almeida NC, et al. Comparison of cytokine levels and metabolic parameters of stored platelet concentrates of the Fundação Hemominas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2012;34:94–9. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20120029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Plaza EM, Lozano ML, Guiu IS, et al. Evaluation of platelet function during extended storage in additive solution, prepared in a new container that allows manual buffy-coat platelet pooling and leucoreduction in the same system. Blood Transfus. 2012;10:480–9. doi: 10.2450/2012.0112-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vignoli A, Giaccherini C, Marchetti M, et al. Tissue factor expression on platelet surface during preparation and storage of platelet concentrates. Transfus Med Hemother. 2013;40:126–32. doi: 10.1159/000350330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Quintero M, Núñez M, Mellado S, et al. Evaluation of store lesion in platelet obtained by apheresis compared to platelet derived from whole blood and its impact on the in vitro functionality. Transfus Apher Sci. 2015;53:293–9. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2015.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Daskalakis M, Colucci G, Keller P, et al. Decreased generation of procoagulant platelets detected by flow cytometric analysis in patients with bleeding diathesis. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2014;86:397–409. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Södergren AL, Tynngård N, Berlin G, et al. Responsiveness of platelets during storage studied with flow cytometry formation of platelet subpopulations and LAMP-1 as new markers for the platelet storage lesion. Vox Sang. 2016;110:116–25. doi: 10.1111/vox.12324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Thiele T, Sablewski A, Iuga C, et al. Profiling alterations in platelets induced by Amotosalen/UVA pathogen reduction and gamma irradiation--a LC-ESI-MS/MS-based proteomics approach. Blood Transfus. 2012;10( Suppl 2):s63–70. doi: 10.2450/2012.010S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thiele T, Iuga C, Janetzky S, et al. Early storage lesions in apheresis platelets are induced by the activation of the integrin αIIbβ3 and focal adhesion signaling pathways. J Proteomics. 2012;76:297–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pienimaeki-Roemer A, Ruebsaamen K, Boettcher A, et al. Stored platelets alter glycerophospholipid and sphingolipid species, which are differentially transferred to newly released extracellular vesicles. Transfusion. 2013;53:612–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.von Papen M, Gambaryan S, Schütz C, et al. Determination of ATP and ADP Secretion from Human and Mouse Platelets by an HPLC Assay. Transfus Med Hemother. 2013;40:109–16. doi: 10.1159/000350294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Perales Villarroel JP, Figueredo R, Guan Y, et al. Increased platelet storage time is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired platelet function. J Surg Res. 2013;184:422–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Prudova A, Serrano K, Eckhard U, et al. TAILS N-terminomics of human platelets reveals pervasive metalloproteinase-dependent proteolytic processing in storage. Blood. 2014;124:e49–60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-04-569640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bello-López JM, Ibáñez-Cervantes G, Fernández-Sánchez V, et al. Propagation capacity of bacterial contaminants in platelet concentrates using a luciferase reporter system. Transfus Apher Sci. 2015;52:326–31. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2015.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Johnson L, Marks D. Treatment of platelet concentrates with the mirasol pathogen inactivation system modulates platelet oxidative stress and NF-κB activation. Transfus Med Hemother. 2015;42:167–73. doi: 10.1159/000403245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Paglia G, Sigurjónsson ÓE, Rolfsson Ó, et al. Comprehensive metabolomic study of platelets reveals the expression of discrete metabolic phenotypes during storage. Transfusion. 2014;54:2911–23. doi: 10.1111/trf.12710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Paglia G, Sigurjónsson ÓE, Rolfsson Ó, et al. Metabolomic analysis of platelets during storage: a comparison between apheresis- and buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates. Transfusion. 2015;55:301–13. doi: 10.1111/trf.12834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pontes TB, de Moreira-Nunes CF, Maués JH, et al. The miRNA profile of platelets stored in a blood bank and its relation to cellular damage from storage. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Aloui C, Prigent A, Sut C, et al. The signaling role of CD40 ligand in platelet biology and in platelet component transfusion. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:22342–64. doi: 10.3390/ijms151222342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]