Skip to main content
Eurosurveillance logoLink to Eurosurveillance
. 2018 Jan 11;23(2):17-00821. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.2.17-00821

Detection of mcr-4 positive Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in clinical isolates of human origin, Italy, October to November 2016

Edoardo Carretto 1, Flavia Brovarone 1, Paola Nardini 1, Giuseppe Russello 1, Daniela Barbarini 2, Stefano Pongolini 3, Carlo Gagliotti 4, Alessandra Carattoli 5, Mario Sarti 6
PMCID: PMC5770850  PMID: 29338810

Abstract

In this study we report the detection of the recently described mcr-4 gene in two human isolates of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. The strains were isolated from faecal samples of two Italian patients with gastroenteritis, collected in 2016. The identified mcr-4 genes (variant mcr-4.2) differed from the mcr-4 gene originally described in a Salmonella strain of swine origin from Italy. Salmonella species could represent a hidden reservoir for mcr genes.

Keywords: mcr-4, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, colistin resistance, human, mobile colistin resistance, Italy


In the context of an analysis into the epidemiology of mobile colistin determinants, we investigated a collection of 106 human clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. These isolates were obtained between January 2016 and October 2017 in two main hospitals in Emilia Romagna, Italy, namely IRCCS Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia and Sant’Agostino-Estense Hospital of Baggiovara. These isolates had originally been selected on the basis of their reduced susceptibility to colistin (MIC ≥ 2 mg/L). Among the 67 Escherichia coli, 27 Klebsiella pneumoniae, six Salmonella species and six other Enterobacteriaceae collected, we detected the mcr-4 gene in two human isolates of S. enterica subsp. enterica monophasic variant of serovar Typhimurium. The mcr-4 gene was not detected in any other isolate of the above collection; further analyses for other mcr genes are ongoing in these and additional isolates.

Description of the isolates

The two Salmonella strains were isolated from faecal samples of outpatients with gastroenteritis who were referred to the Sant’Agostino-Estense Hospital. The first specimen, named AB-160, was collected in October 2016, the second one (AB-243) in November 2016. Patient data did not reveal any social, nosocomial or epidemiological links between the two patients. The disease was self-limiting and did not require hospitalisation or supportive therapy. According to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints [1], the two isolates showed the same susceptibility profile on an automated instrument (Vitek-2, BioMérieux, France) and were resistant to ampicillin, piperacillin and colistin and susceptible to other beta-lactams.

After their isolation, the strains were serotyped by the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-Romagna (IZSLER) following the White–Kauffmann–Le Minor scheme by slide agglutination with O and H antigen-specific sera (DID, Milan, Italy; Biogenetics, Padua, Italy). Both strains were identified as S. enterica subsp. enterica monophasic variant of serovar Typhimurium with antigenic formula 4,[5],12:i:- [2]. PFGE was performed according to the PulseNet protocol with XbaI digestion [3], and restriction profiles were analysed by BioNumerics 7.5 (Applied Maths, Saint-Martens – Latem, Belgium). The two isolates had different pulsotypes (AB-160: STYMXB.0083 and AB-243: STYMXB_PR.1681) but those were very similar, with a single band difference.

Colistin resistance was initially detected by using the automated instrument Vitek-2 (BioMérieux, France). They were confirmed in two different centres by using BMD-based commercial systems (SensiTest Colistin, Liofilchem, Italy, and Sensititre, ThermoFisher, US) and also with BMD performed in the IRCCS Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova of Reggio Emilia according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [4] and EUCAST (ISO standard method 20776-1) [5]. Three reference strains (E. coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and E. coli NCTC 13846) were used as controls for susceptibility testing. Both Salmonella strains had a MIC for colistin of 8 mg/L by using SensiTest Colistin and the reference BMD, whereas Sensititre documented MICs of 4 mg/L and 8 mg/L for isolate AB-160 and AB-243, respectively.

Detection of mcr-4

The DNA of the isolates was extracted using UltraClean microbial DNA isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories, US). The presence of mcr genes was investigated by different PCRs with previously described primers [6-10]. Both Salmonella isolates were positive for the mcr-4 gene, using the internal primers Mcr-4 FW and Mcr-4 RV [7], and negative for the other four mcr genes. On these two isolates, the external primers Mcr-4 ext FW and Mcr-4 ext RV [7], targeting a fragment between 104 bases upstream of the start codon and 91 bases downstream of the stop codon of the mcr-4 gene, gave no positive amplification. Furthermore, primers targeting the repB gene of the ColE10 plasmid did not give any amplification product [7].

To better characterise these mcr-4 genes, we designed two additional primers derived from the sequence of the mcr-4 gene published in GenBank, accession number NG_055659.1. The forward primer was Mcr4Fw_Out (AATGAGGTCAAGCTAGTAT) corresponding to bases 54–72 of NG_055659.1 (located at 47 to 29 bases upstream of the mcr-4 start codon), and the reverse primer was Mcr4Rv_Out (ATATGTCACCCCTAAGATAA), matching bases 1,744–1,763 of NG_055659.1 (located at 18 to 37 bases downstream of the mcr-4 stop codon). The annealing temperature was 54 °C.

An amplification product was obtained for both isolates and sequenced using both the above primers and previous internal primers. A sequence of 1,630 bp, identical for the two isolates, was obtained and deposited in GenBank with the accession number MG581979. MG581979 was a perfect match with the sequence NG_055659.1 across 1,629 bp, with a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at position 1,001 of MG581979 (A to G), causing a transition of Q to R at amino acid position 331. This mutation defines this allele which we refer to as mcr-4.2.

Discussion

Colistin is currently considered as the last-choice treatment for human infection caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, despite well documented side effects and toxicity. Until recently, colistin resistance was extremely rare, mostly because of chromosomal mutations. In 2016, the first plasmid-mediated resistance to colistin was reported with the discovery of the mcr-1 gene which encodes a phosphoethanolamine transferase [10]. Since then, different studies, based on retrospective analysis of strain collections, have demonstrated that this gene has a worldwide distribution [11], suggestive of a period of undetected dissemination. Currently, at least 12 different mcr-1 gene variants have been acknowledged in GenBank (from mcr-1.1 to mcr-1.12: KP347127.1; KX236309.1; KY400027.1; KY041856.1; KY271416.1; KY352406.1; KY488488.1; KY685070.1; KY685071.1; MF176238.1; KY853650.1; LC337668.1). Furthermore, four additional mcr genes with varying homology to mcr-1 have been discovered and named mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 [6-9]. The mcr-4 gene was first described in 2017 in an Italian strain of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica (monophasic variant of serovar Typhimurium 4,[5],12, i:-) of swine origin isolated in 2013 [7].

To our knowledge, this is the first report of mcr-4-positive bacterial isolates of human origin. The two Salmonella species belonged to the same serovar as the first mcr-4-positive Salmonella strain reported in a pig slaughtered in Italy [7]. That study had also reported 11 mcr-4-positive E. coli strains of animal origin in Spain and in Belgium, suggesting a dissemination of the novel gene among European countries and highlighting the need to evaluate possible risk and burden for human health [7]. The presence of the different mcr-4.2 variant, the lack of amplification with external primers located outside of the coding sequence and the negative result for the ColE10 plasmid suggest that the genetic background of the mcr-4 gene in our two human isolates is different from that in the Salmonella R3445 of animal origin [7]. Further analysis through whole genome sequencing is in progress to investigate the genetic homology of the two human isolates and their phylogenetic relatedness with the Salmonella isolate of veterinary origin.

This serovar of Salmonella is involved in most cases of human infection in the Emilia-Romagna region (personal communication: Stefano Pongolini, regional reference laboratory for surveillance of enteric pathogens at IZSLER, July 2017). Particularly in the period from July to August 2014, pulsotype STYMXB.0083 spread extensively thorough the provinces of Reggio Emilia and Modena (personal communication: Stefano Pongolini, IZSLER section of Parma, July 2017). On that occasion, the source of infection was identified as a pork product contaminated with the same Salmonella genotype as the human isolates. Since one of our strains had the pulsotype STYMXB.0083, further studies on the possible spread of mobile colistin resistance in a larger set of Salmonella strains, at least in our area, would be helpful to assess the risk to human health.

As demonstrated by the wide distribution of mcr-1 worldwide [11], it could be hypothesised that also mcr-4 has been spreading for many years undetected among Enterobacteriaceae in animals in European countries, with occasional transmission to humans. Rates of colistin resistance could be underestimated owing to the poor performance of different automated systems used routinely in clinical microbiology laboratories [12,13]. Epidemiology and distribution of mcr genes among animal and human isolates should be further investigated to evaluate their dissemination and possible transmission to strains which harbour other resistance determinants, such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases, as already demonstrated [12]. Acquisition of mobile colistin resistance by multidrug-resistant microorganisms in clinical settings would represent a serious problem for treatment and infection control [14]. Salmonella could represent a hidden reservoir for mobile colistin resistance determinants, considering the intensive use of colistin in animal farming that may have contributed to the selection of colistin-resistant strains [7]. Further studies and implementation of surveillance policies (improvement of laboratory methods for correct evaluation of phenotypical colistin resistance, e.g. by using BMD-based techniques as first-line antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and epidemiological analyses at local and national level, based on molecular detection of the different mobile resistance determinants, e.g. by multiplex PCRs) may be useful to understand the complexity and extent of the circulation of the different mcr genes and their impact in human health [15].

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Emilio Scotti for his helpful technical support in sequencing procedures. The authors thank Dr Jonathan M Tyrrell for his support in revising the manuscript.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Authors’ contributions: This study was designed by EC and AC. Isolates were collected by MS. Experimental work was done by EC, FB, GR, DB, SP. Data were analysed and interpreted by EC, DB, SP and AC. The manuscript was drafted by EC and PN, revised by EC, AC and SP and was reviewed by all authors.

References

  • 1.The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 7.1, 2017. Växjö: EUCAST; 2017. Available from: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_7.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf
  • 2.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Microbiology of the food chain. Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella. Part 3: Guidelines for serotyping of Salmonella spp. ISO/TR 6579-3:2014. Geneva: ISO; 2014. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/56714.html
  • 3.Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Standard operating procedure for PulseNet PFGE of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Escherichia coli non-O157 (STEC), Salmonella serotypes, Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri. Atlanta: CDC; 2013. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pdf/ecoli-shigella-salmonella-pfge-protocol-508c.pdf
  • 4.Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 27th ed. CLSI supplement M100S. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2017. Available from: https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/
  • 5.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO-20776-1:2006 Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems - Susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices - Part 1: Reference method for testing the in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against rapidly growing aerobic bacteria involved in infectious diseases. Geneva: ISO; 2006. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/41630.html
  • 6.Borowiak M, Fischer J, Hammerl JA, Hendriksen RS, Szabo I, Malorny B. Identification of a novel transposon-associated phosphoethanolamine transferase gene, mcr-5, conferring colistin resistance in d-tartrate fermenting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(12):3317-24. 10.1093/jac/dkx327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carattoli A, Villa L, Feudi C, Curcio L, Orsini S, Luppi A, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-4 gene in Salmonella and Escherichia coli, Italy 2013, Spain and Belgium, 2015 to 2016. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(31):30589. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.31.30589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xavier BB, Lammens C, Ruhal R, Kumar-Singh S, Butaye P, Goossens H, et al. Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(27):30280. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.27.30280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yin W, Li H, Shen Y, Liu Z, Wang S, Shen Z, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli. MBio. 2017;8(3):e00543-17. 10.1128/mBio.00543-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):161-8. 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schwarz S, Johnson AP. Transferable resistance to colistin: a new but old threat. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(8):2066-70. 10.1093/jac/dkw274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chew KL, La MV, Lin RTP, Teo JWP. Colistin and polymyxin B susceptibility testing for carbapenem-resistant and mcr-positive Enterobacteriaceae: comparison of Sensititre, MicroScan, Vitek 2, and Etest with broth microdilution. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(9):2609-16. 10.1128/JCM.00268-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin - problems detected with several commercially available products. In: EUCAST warnings concerning antimicrobial susceptibility testing products or procedures. Växjö: EUCAST; 2017. Available from: http://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria/warnings/
  • 14.Delgado-Blas JF, Ovejero CM, Abadia-Patiño L, Gonzalez-Zorn B. Coexistence of mcr-1 and blaNDM-1 in Escherichia coli from Venezuela. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(10):6356-8. 10.1128/AAC.01319-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. Available from: https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publications/enterobacteriaceae-risk-assessment-diseases-caused-by-antimicrobial-resistant-microorganisms-europe-june-2016.pdf

Articles from Eurosurveillance are provided here courtesy of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

RESOURCES