Graphical abstract
Keywords: Radionuclides, Tiles, Hazard indices, Annual effective dose rate
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the activity concentration of natural radionuclides (226Ra, 232Th and 40K) for fifteen (15) different brands of tile samples used for building purposes in Nigeria. The tile samples were analyzed using High purity Germanium gamma detector. The mean activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K were observed to be 61.1 ± 5.5 Bq/kg, 70.2 ± 6.08 Bq/kg and 514.7 ± 59.8 Bq/kg respectively. Various hazard indices such as absorbed dose rate, external and internal hazard index, annual effective dose rate, Gamma activity Index (Iγ) and Alpha Index (Iα) were calculated. The obtained results showed that the mean radium equivalent activity (Raeq), the absorbed dose rate (D), external and internal hazard index, the annual effective dose (AEDR) equivalent, Gamma activity Index (Iγ) and Alpha Index (Iα) were: 204.42 Bq/kg, 177.61 nGyh−1, 0.55, 0.77, 0.96 mSvyr−1, 0.74 and 0.32 respectively. The average value of radium equivalent obtained in this study is less than that of the recommended value of 370 Bq/kg but the average values of the other radiological hazards for some samples are found to be slightly above international recommended values except Hex, Hin and AEDE which are within the international reference value of unity. The measured concentrations of these radioactive materials were correlated with other previous result obtained from similar tile materials used in other countries and found to be in good agreement with the international standard, however, the tiles are recommended for decoration purposes in Nigeria.
Method details
Humans society have always been exposed on daily basis to natural radionuclides such as 232Th, 226Ra and 40K [1]. These radionuclides in the series are headed by 226Ra (238U) and are relatively less important from a dosimetric point of view [2]. The origin of these materials is the Earth's crust, but they find their way into building materials, air, water, food and the human body itself. The world wide average indoor effective dose due to gamma rays from building materials is estimated to be about 0.4 mSv per year [[3], [4]]. Globally, building materials that contain radioactive nuclides have been used for many decades. As individuals spend more than 80% of their time indoors, the internal and external radiation exposure from building materials creates prolonged exposure situations [5]. The external radiation exposure is caused by the gamma emitting radionuclides, which in the uranium series mainly belongs to the decay chain segment starting with 226Ra. The internal (inhalation) radiation exposure is due to 222Rn, and marginally to 220Rn, and their short lived decay products, exhaled from building materials into the room air [4]. Papastefanou et al. [6] carried out a study in Greece on building materials, which showed that out of the investigated building materials such as tiles which are by product of granite, phosphogypsum etc. are highly radioactive materials for which the absorbed dose rate in indoor air becomes up to five times higher than the dose criterion. Such radioactive materials contribute significantly to radiation exposure because they comprise gamma and beta emitters [[7], [1]]. Building materials, derived from rock, sand, soil and byproduct of industry, often contain varying amounts of natural radionuclides [[8], [9], [10]]. The knowledge of the natural radioactivity level of building materials is important for determination of population exposure to radiation. Furthermore, knowledge of this radioactivity is useful in setting the standards and national guidelines for the use and management of these materials and in assessing the associated radiation hazard to human health [11]. The natural radioactivity level of building materials can vary considerably according to the geological locations and geochemical characteristics of those materials. Due to the increasing social concern, the natural radioactivity level of building materials has been reported in many countries [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]]. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the activity concentration of natural radioactivity content in the commonly used building materials such as tiles of various types and sizes in Nigeria and to estimate the radiation hazards associated to individuals by using radium equivalent activity, external and internal hazard indexes, indoor air absorbed dose rate and annual effective dose rate. The results are compared with the internationally reference values to ascertain the safer tiles useful for building purpose in Nigeria.
Materials and methods
Samples
Total numbers of 15 samples of various tiles which include foreign and locally produced were used for this study. These tiles are Virony (china), Gomez (Spain), BN Ceramics (Nigeria), Virony Rustic (China), PNT Ceramics (Nigeria), Pamesa (Spain), Virony (China), Virony (China) Rustic Glass, Iris (Italy), Golden Crown Ceramics (Nigeria), Royal Ceramics (Nigeria), Royal Crown(Nigeria), Goodwill Super Polish (Nigeria), BN Ceramics (Spain) and Goodwill Ceramics (Nigeria). This is shown in Table 1 with their sample names, sample ID and country. The tiles samples used for this work were purchased from the Nigerian commercial markets. Initial labeling and cataloguing was done for easy identification. The tiles were broken into smaller pieces so as to allow further processing. All the samples were crushed using the Pascall Engineering Lab milling machine to pulverizable size. After each tile sample was crushed, the crusher or lab milling machine was thoroughly cleaned with high pressure blower (Wolf from Kango Wolf power tools, made in London, type 8793 and serial no: 978A) before the next sample was crushed, to avoid cross contamination of the samples.
Table 1.
Tiles of different types and country of origin used in Nigeria.
Sample Name | Country | Sample ID |
---|---|---|
Virony | China | 40 × 40 |
Gomez | Spain | 40 × 40 |
BN Ceramics | Nigeria | 60 × 60 |
Virony Rustic | China | 40 × 40 |
PNT Ceramics | Nigeria | 30 × 30 |
Pamesa | Spain | 600 × 300 |
Virony | China | 30 × 30 |
Virony Rustic Glass | China | 40 × 40 |
Iris | Italy | 33.3 × 33.3 |
Golden Crown Ceramics | Nigeria | 25 × 30 |
Royal Ceramics | Nigeria | 40 × 40 |
Royal Crown | Nigeria | 30 × 30 |
Goodwill Super Polish | Nigeria | 60 × 60 |
BN Ceramics | Spain | 45 × 45 |
Goodwill Ceramics | Nigeria | 40 × 40 |
A very fine power was achieved from the pulverized samples, but for homogeneity, a 250 μm sieve size was used and 1 kg of the sieved sample was weighed out. It was then placed in polythene nylon and labeled accordingly. High density polyethylene bottles (HDPB) were used to package the samples for radioactivity study. The bottles were washed with water and detergent and then rinsed six times with ordinary borehole water before finally rinsing with distilled water. The sieved samples of tiles that were contained in each bottle weighed 200 g.
Gamma ray detection system for this study
The analysis was carried out using the gamma ray spectrometry facilities at the Nuclear Lab. Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. A high resolution spectrometer was used for the measurement of the gamma energy spectrum of emitted gamma-rays in the energy range between 50 keV and 2000 keV. The gamma ray spectrometry consists of a high purity germanium (HPGe) detector with a counting efficiency of 20%, a resolution of 1.8 keV for 1332 keV gamma ray emission of 60Co. The detector used in gamma ray measurements was Canberra GC2018 with Genie-2000 software. The gamma detector was cooled by liquid nitrogen at 77 K for the purpose of reducing leakage current and thermal noise, and its warm-up sensor is coupled to the high voltage detector bias supply. The pre-amplifier was placed inside a lead shield to reduce background radiation [23]. The decay isotopes, gamma energy and gamma disintegrations are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
The decay Isotopes, Gamma-ray Energy and Gamma disintegration.
Radioactive Series | Decaying Isotopes | Gamma-ray Energy (keV) | Percentage of Gamma Disintegration (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Uranium | 214Pb (for 238U decay series) | 352.0 | 35 |
214Bi (for 238U decay series) | 609.4 | 43 | |
Thorium | 208Tl (for 232Th decay series) | 583.1 | 30 |
228Ac (for 232Th decay series) | 911.1 | 29 | |
Kalium | 40K | 1460.8 | 10.68 or 11 |
Standard sample preparation for gamma spectrometry
The IAEA standard sample Thorium Ore (S-14) and Lake Sediment (SL-2) were used as reference materials and mixed with SiO2 in Marinelli beakers. The Uranium and Thorium contents from S-14 are 29 ppm and 610 ppm respectively. A weight of 20.00 g from Sample IAEA S-14 was thoroughly mixed with 100.00 g of SiO2 in a Marinelli beaker (Coded as S-14). After mixing with SiO2, the Uranium and Thorium concentrations are 4.63 ppm and 97.3 ppm respectively. The IAEA standard sample SL-2 was used to calculate the specific activity of potassium (K). It has a specific activity of 240 Bq kg−1. Another Marinelli beaker containing a weight of 74.18 g of SL-2 was mixed with 100.00 g of SiO2 (Coded as SL-2). This provides background for standard samples. The IAEA standard samples used in this study are presented in Table 3.
Table 3.
IAEA standard samples used in this study.
Standard Sample Code | Concentrations |
||
---|---|---|---|
U (ppm) | Th (ppm) | K (Bq/kg) | |
S-14 (Thorium ore) | 29 | 610 | – |
SL-2 (Late sediment) | – | – | 240 |
Calculation of 238U and 232Th in thorium ore (IAEA S-14) and 40K in lake sediment (IAEA SL-2)
238U:
(1) |
232Th:
(2) |
(3) |
40K:
(4) |
Measurement of gamma-ray radioactivity from the tiles samples used in this study
The tiles imported and produced in Nigeria of different brands purchased from different suppliers, were prepared according to IAEA TRS-295 [24]. The samples were sealed and stored for four weeks to achieve secular equilibrium between radium and its progeny [[25], [26], [27]]. Under the conditions of secular equilibrium, 232Th concentration was determined from the average concentration of 208Tl using the 583 keV peak and 228Ac by using the 911 keV peak. 238U was determined from the average concentrations of the 214Pb by using the 352 keV peak and 214Bi by using the 609 keV peak [[25], [26], [27]]. The 1460 keV peak was used to determine the concentration of K. Each sample was put into a shielded HPGe detector and measured for 21600 s. The background gamma-ray spectrum of the detection system was determined with an empty Marinelli beaker under identical conditions, and was subtracted from the spectra of each sample. The specific activity was determined by comparing with IAEA standard samples S-14 (Thorium ore) and SL-2 (Lake Sediment). The concentration of the 238U and 232Th was determined using Eqs. (5) and (6). Eqs. (7) and (8) were used for 40K
(5) |
where
Csamp = concentration of sample collected (ppm)
Cstd = concentration of the standard sample (ppm)
Wstd = weight of the standard sample (g)
Wsamp = weight of the sample collected (g)
Nsamp = net counts of the photopeak area of the sample collected
Nstd = net counts of the photopeak area of the standard sample.
The uncertainty of the sample concentration was calculated by using the accurate approach by [30,28].
(6) |
Conversion factors were used to convert ppm to Bq kg−1. [238U; 1 ppm = 12.35 Bq kg−1; 232Th; 1 ppm = 4.06 Bq kg−1]. Whereas 1% of 40K = 313 Bq kg−1 [24].
The specific activity of potassium was calculated by using the formula:
(7) |
where
Asamp = the specific activity of the sample collected (Bq Kg−1)
Astd = the specific activity of standard sample (Bq Kg−1)
Wstd = the weight of the standard sample (Kg)
Nsamp = the net counts of the photopeak area for the sample collected
Wsamp = the weight of the sample collected (Kg)
Nstd = the net counts of the photopeak area for the standard sample.
The uncertainty of the specific activity of potassium was calculated by using the following formula:
(8) |
Results and discussions
Radionuclides determination
Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3 illustrates the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K for various tiles samples used for building in Nigeria. The outcome of the activity concentration values for these radioactive materials (226Ra, 232Th and 40K) and their mean activities are shown in Table 2. The measured mean activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K radionuclides in various tiles samples were observed to be 61.1 ± 5.5 Bq/kg, 70.2 ± 6.08 Bq/kg and 514.7 ± 59.8 Bq/kg respectively. Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3 describe the relationship between specific concentration activities of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K and the various tiles samples respectively. From Table 4, it was observed that activity concentration of 226Ra of the sample tiles ranged between 37.5 ± 3.6 Bq/kg and 241 ± 25.3 Bq/kg with PNT ceramics tile having the highest value of 241 ± 25.3 Bq/kg (Fig. 1), while the lowest concentration activity of 226Ra is found in Pamesa tile type sample (Spain) with value of 30.5 ± 4.1 Bq/kg, followed by BN ceramic tile which is produced in Nigeria where the activity concentration was 37.5 ± 3.6 Bq/kg. Except for PNT ceramics tile, all other tile samples are within the permissible value that ranged between 30 and 200 Bq/kg [31] for 226Ra. Highest concentration activities of 232Th were found to be Virony tile type imported from China with the value of 126.5 ± 9.1 Bq/kg, followed by BNT ceramic tiles imported from Spain and BNT ceramic tiles which was locally produced in Nigeria with values of 104.5 ± 8.3 Bq/kg and 101.5 ± 8.2 Bq/kg respectively. The lowest 232Th activity concentration was found to be Royal crown tile (Nigeria) with value of 41 ± 3.6 Bq/kg. Fig. 3 shows the highest values of 40K activity which are 940 ± 115.1 and 650 ± 81.4 Bq/kg for tile samples Iris and Pamesa from Italy and Spain respectively. Comparing the concentration activity value of 40K with the [31] report, it shows that the values are within permissible value of 160–1410 Bq/kg. A comparative analysis with the previous investigation conducted in different parts of the world has been shown in Table 5.
Fig. 1.
Concentrations of 226Ra for various tiles samples used for building in Nigeria.
Fig. 2.
Concentrations of 232Th for various tiles samples used for building in Nigeria.
Fig. 3.
Concentrations of 40K for various tiles samples used for building in Nigeria.
Table 4.
Activity concentrations in Bq/kg of commercial tiles samples used in Nigeria.
Sample Name | Sample size | Activity Concentration (Bq/kg) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
226Ra | 232Th | 40K | ||
Virony (China) | 40 × 40 | 55.5 ± 4.2 | 126.5 ± 9.1 | 530 ± 65.1 |
Gomez (Spain) | 40 × 40 | 57.5 ± 4.2 | 75 ± 8.1 | 450 ± 52.1 |
BN Ceramics (Nig) | 60 × 60 | 37.5 ± 3.6 | 101.5 ± 8.2 | 670 ± 70.2 |
Virony Rustic (China) | 40 × 40 | 59.5 ± 4.1 | 41.5 ± 3.6 | 480 ± 52.1 |
PNT Ceramics | 30 × 30 | 241 ± 25.3 | 77.5 ± 8.1 | 510.0 ± 62.6 |
Pamesa (Spain) | 600 × 300 | 30.5 ± 4.1 | 64 ± 4.1 | 650 ± 81.4 |
Virony (China) | 30 × 30 | 55 ± 4.2 | 52 ± 4.2 | 440 ± 42.1 |
Virony (China) Rustic Glass | 40 × 40 | 42.5 ± 3.6 | 63 ± 4.1 | 390 ± 50.1 |
Iris (Italy) | 33.3 × 33.3 | 59.5 ± 4.2 | 79 ± 8.3 | 940 ± 115.1 |
Golden Crown Ceramics (Nig) | 25 × 30 | 49.5 ± 3.1 | 57.5 ± 4.6 | 460 ± 50.4 |
Royal Ceramics (Nig) | 40 × 40 | 65.5 ± 5.4 | 44 ± 4.1 | 390 ± 50.2 |
Royal Crown | 30 × 30 | 51.5 ± 3.7 | 41 ± 3.9 | 440 ± 42.1 |
Goodwill Super Polish (Nig) | 60 × 60 | 44 ± 3.6 | 51.5 ± 4.5 | 270 ± 30.5 |
BN Ceramics (Spain) | 45 × 45 | 55 ± 4.2 | 104.5 ± 8.3 | 570 ± 67.3 |
Goodwill Ceramics (Nig) | 40 × 40 | 62 ± 5.2 | 74.5 ± 8.1 | 530 ± 65.1 |
Average concentration | 61. 1 ± 5.5 | 70.2 ± 6.08 | 514.7 ± 59.8 | |
Range | 30.5–241.0 | 41.5–126.5 | 270.0–940.0 |
Table 5.
Comparative analysis of activity concentrations in Bq/kg of commercial tiles samples used in different countries.
Countries | Activity Concentration (Bq/kg) |
Reference | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
226Ra |
232Th |
40K |
|||||
Range | Average | Range | Average | Range | Average | ||
Pakistan | 63.1–123.9 | 83.4 | – | – | 144.1–834 | 403.5 | [32] |
Egypt (Lecico and El-Gawhra) | 41.7–60.7 | 52.2 | 30.7–47.1 | 39.1 | 195–680 | 480 | [33] |
Qena (Egypt) | 40–230 | 126 | 10–130 | 72 | 80–600 | 300 | [34] |
Algeria | 55 | – | 41 | – | 410 | [35] | |
Egypt (Cleopatra Factory) | 71.2–86 | 76.1 | 63.3–68.7 | 66.2 | 900–1018 | 962 | [36] |
China | 63.5–131.4 | – | 55.4–106.5 | – | 63.5–131.4 | – | [37] |
Italy | – | 56 | – | 43 | – | 440 | [38] |
Cameroon | 11.3–13.13 | 12 | 18.63–22.64 | 20 | – | 319 | [13] |
Palestine | 45.4–102.0 | 73.7 | 38.8–78.3 | 58.2 | 363–871.2 | 624 | [39] |
Yemen | 0–549 | 131.88 | 13–267 | 83.55 | 24–869 | 400.7 | [1] |
Nigeria | 37.5– 241.0 | 61. 1 | 41.5–126.5 | 70.2 | 270.0–940.0 | 514.7 | Present study |
Exposure risk assessment
Radioactivity equivalent (Raeq)
The radionuclides distribution such as 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in tiles are not homogeneous. Comparing the concentrations and assessing the health risk hazard of the tile materials, the radioactive activity equivalent (Raeq). The radioactivity equivalent is defined generally as [29]
Raeq = ACRA + 1.43ACTh + 0.077ACK | (9) |
where ACRA, ACTh and ACK are the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K respectively in Bq/kg. Eq. (9) is based on the fact that 370 Bq/kg of 226Ra, 259 Bq/kg of 232Th and 4810 Bq/kg of 40K produce the same gamma ray dose equivalent [13]. The maximum value of Radioactivity equivalent must be less than 370 Bq/kg in order to maintain the external dose <1.5 mGy/yr [12]. The values of radioactivity equivalent are shown in Table 6. The measured value ranged between138.44 and 391.10 Bq/kg with mean value of 204.42 Bq/kg which is less than the recommended value of 370 Bq/kg by UNSCEAR [3] and International Atomic Energy Agency [31].
Table 6.
Radiation indices of the various tiles samples used in Nigeria.
Sample No. | Sample Name | Raeq(Bq/kg) | D(nGyh−1) | Hex | Hin | AEDR (mSv/yr) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17 | Virony (China) | 277.21 | 232.61 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 1.30 |
18 | Gomez (Spain) | 199.40 | 171.40 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.94 |
19 | BN Ceramics | 234.24 | 199.75 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 1.12 |
20 | Virony Rustic (China) | 155.81 | 138.79 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.73 |
21 | PNT Ceramics | 391. 10 | 347.77 | 1.06 | 1.71 | 1.77 |
22 | Pamesa (Spain) | 172.07 | 150.46 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.83 |
23 | Virony (China) | 163.24 | 143.00 | 0.44 | 0.59 | 0.77 |
24 | Virony (China) Rustic Glass | 162.62 | 139.60 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.77 |
25 | Iris (Italy) | 244.85 | 216.84 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 1. 18 |
26 | Golden Crown Ceramics (Nigeria) | 167.15 | 145.59 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.79 |
27 | Royal Ceramics (Nigeria) | 158.45 | 139.86 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 0.74 |
28 | Royal Crown (Nigeria) | 144.01 | 127.68 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 0.68 |
29 | Goodwill Super Polish (Nigeria) | 138.44 | 118.73 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.65 |
30 | BN Ceramics (Spain) | 248.33 | 211.15 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 1. 17 |
31 | Goodwill Ceramics (Nigeria) | 209.35 | 181.39 | 0.57 | 0.73 | 0.99 |
32 | Average | 204.42 | 177.61 | 0.55 | 0.73 | 0.96 |
Range | 138.44–391. 10 | 118.73–347.77 | 0.37–1.06 | 0.49–1.71 | 0.65–1.77 |
Absorbed dose rate
The indoor air absorbed dose rate (D) as a result of emission of gamma ray from the natural radioactive materials in the building materials (such as tiles) is estimated based on the [40] report as shown in Eq. (10)
D(nGyh−1) = 0.92CRa + 1.1CTh + 0.08Ck | (10) |
where CRa, CTh and Ck the activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K respectively in Bq/kg. The value obtained for absorbed rate ranged from 118.73 to 347.77 nGyh−1 as shown in Table 6 with average value of 177.61 nGyh−1. It was observed that PNT ceramic tile have the highest absorbed dose rate of 347.77 nGyh−1 while Goodwill super polish tile have the lowest value of 118.73 nGyh−1 for the absorbed dose rate. Further observation shows that the values of absorbed dose rate for the entire sample tiles are more than the recommended value of 55 nGyh−1 [41] and 84 nGyh−1 by [3] respectively.
External and internal hazard index
Exposure of radiation due to radionuclides such as 226Ra, 232Th and 40K may be external and internal. The hazard which is defined in relation to external and internal hazard is represented by Hex and Hin respectively and can be determined using Eqs. (11) and (12) [12]:
Hin = (CRa/370) + (CTh/259) + (CK/4810) | (11) |
Hex = (CRa/185) + (CTh/259) + (CK/4810) | (12) |
where CRa, CTh and CK are activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K, respectively in Bq/kg. The index value for Eq. (11) should be less than 1 or negligible in order for the external hazard to be acceptable to the public [12]. The maximum value of unity for Hex corresponds to the limit 370 Bq/kg for Radioactivity equivalent. For the safe use of a building material in the dwellings construction, Hin should be less than unity. The calculated values of the Hex and Hin for tile samples used are shown in Table 6. The values ranged between 0.37 and 1.06 with mean value of 0.55 for external hazard (Hex) while the values for internal hazard (Hin) range from 0.49 to 1.71. The obtained result for Hex for PNT ceramic tile is above recommended limit of unity as well as Hin which is almost twice the recommended value. The results for other tile samples are less than unity and are in agreement with the recommended international values.
Annual effective dose rate
In determining the annual effective dose, the coefficient of conversion factor (0.7SvGy−1) from the absorbed dose in air to the effective dose received by individual and the indoor occupancy factor 0.8 as proposed by [3] are used. The annual effective dose rate (AED) is calculated using Eq. (13):
AEDR (mSvy−1) = D (nGyh−1) × 8760 (h) × 0.8 × 0.7 (SvGy−1) × 10−6 | (13) |
The annual effective dose rate of the tiles used for this study is shown in Table 6 which ranged from 0.65–1.77 mSvy−1 but it was observed that some samples such as Virony (China), BN ceramic (Nigeria), PNT ceramics (Nigeria), Iris (Italy) and BN ceramic (Spain) have values of 1.30 mSv/yr, 1.12 mSv/yr, 1.77 mSv/yr, 1.18 mSv/yr and 1.17 mSv/yr respectively, which exceeded international standard value of 1 mSv/yr while other samples are within the recommended value. It was further observed that concentration of 232Th and 40K might have contributed to the high annual effective dose rate value observed in Virony tile sample while 226Ra and 40 K, 232Th and 40K, 40K, 232Th and 40K contributed to the other tiles samples whose annual effective dose rate is higher than higher the recommended value of 1 mSv/yr.
Gamma index determination (Iγ)
Gamma index is used to evaluate the γ-radiation hazard related to the natural radionuclide in the particular samples under investigation. The gamma index representation (Iγ) is estimated using Eq. (6) as presented by [42].
Iγ = CRa/300 (Bqkg−1) + CTh/200 (Bqkg−1) + CK/3000 (Bqkg−1) | (14) |
The estimated results are presented in Table 7. The controls on the radioactivity of building materials according to RP122 [40] is based on the dose criterion for control and exemption. The dose effective that is above the criterion level of 1 mSvy−1 should be taken into consideration for radiation protection. It is generally recommended that effective doses due to building materials should not exceed 1 mSvy−1 with respect to the outdoor background. Higher doses should be accepted only in highly specific circumstances where materials are locally used. For excess doses in the range 0.3–1 mSvy−1, controls are recommend, while building materials should be exempted from all restrictions, concerning their radioactivity, if the excess gamma radiation originated from them increases the annual effective dose of a member of the public by 0.3 mSv at the most. The gamma activity index is used to identify whether a dose criterion is met [39]. This gamma activity index accounts for the ways and amounts in which the materials used in building, with limit value of their indices not exceeding the recommended value and depends on the dose criterion shown in Table 7. The gamma activity index ≤1 corresponds to annual effective dose less than or equal to 1 mSvy−1, while gamma activity index ≤0.5 corresponds to 0.3 mSvy−1 if the materials are used in bulk quantity. At the same time, gamma activity index ≤6 corresponds to annual effective dose of 1 mSvy−1 and gamma activity index ≤6 2 corresponds to an annual effective dose ≤0.3 mSvy−1 for superficial materials such as tiles which is made in Nigeria vary from 0.49 mSvy−1 (Goodwill Super Polish) to 1.36 mSvy−1 (PNT ceramics) with average value of 0.74 mSvy−1. All the values presented here are below the criterion which corresponds to the protection level of effective maximum dose of 1 mSv, except PNT ceramic.
Table 7.
Gamma activity and alpha indices of the various tiles samples used in Nigeria.
Sample No. | Sample Name | Gamma activity Index(Iγ)(Sv yr−1) | Alpha Index (Iα) |
---|---|---|---|
17 | Virony (China) | 0.99 | 0. 28 |
18 | Gomez (Spain) | 0.72 | 0. 29 |
19 | BN Ceramics | 0.86 | 0.19 |
20 | Virony Rustic (China) | 0.57 | 0. 29 |
21 | PNT Ceramics | 1.36 | 1.21 |
22 | Pamesa (Spain) | 0.64 | 0.15 |
23 | Virony (China) | 0.59 | 0.28 |
24 | Virony (China) Rustic Glass | 0.58 | 0.21 |
25 | Iris (Italy) | 0.91 | 0. 29 |
26 | Golden Crown Ceramics (Nigeria) | 0.61 | 0.24 |
27 | Royal Ceramics (Nigeria) | 0.57 | 0.32 |
28 | Royal Crown (Nigeria) | 0.52 | 0. 26 |
29 | Goodwill Super Polish (Nigeria) | 0.49 | 0.22 |
30 | BN Ceramics (Spain) | 0.89 | 0.28 |
31 | Goodwill Ceramics (Nigeria) | 0.76 | 0.31 |
32 | Average | 0.74 | 0.32 |
33 | Range | 0.49–1.36 | 0.19–1.21 |
Determination of alpha index (Iα)
The assessment of the alpha index is another important aspect of hazard assessment that deals with the estimation of that excess alpha radiation due to radon inhalation originating from building materials. The alpha index calculated using Eq. (15) [[38], [7]] is:
Iα = CRa/200 (Bqkg−1) | (15) |
where CRa is the activity concentration of radium Bqkg−1 in building materials. If the radium activity level in building material exceeds the values of 200 Bqkg−1 there is possibility that the radon exhalation from the material could cause indoor radon concentrations exceeding Bqm−3. Table 5 present the values for alpha index. The International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) recommends an activity level of 200 Bqm−3 for radon in dwellings [43]. At the same time, if this radium activity level is below 100 Bqkg−1, it shows that radon exhalation from building materials may not likely cause indoor concentration greater than 200 Bqm−3 [7]. It is reported that the recommended exempted value and the recommended upper limit for radon concentrations are 100 Bqkg−1 and 200 Bqkg−1 respectively in building materials [44]. It is noted that the upper limit of radon concentration (Iα) is equal to 1 [45]. The results of the present study show that the radon concentration varies from 0.19 to 1.21 respectively with average value of 0.32 for the tiles used in Nigeria.
Conclusions
The measurement of natural radionuclides and its associated radiological hazards from 15 investigated tiles samples used in Nigeria for buildings purposes were evaluated using gamma ray spectrometry. The following conclusions can be drawn:
-
1.
The mean activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K have been found to be in the range of 30.5 ± 4.1–241.0 ± 25.3, 41.5 ± 3.6–126.5 ± 9.1 and 270 ± 30.5–940 ± 115.1 Bq/kg respectively. On the average, activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K were found to be below recommended value.
-
2.
The radium equivalent activity for most of the tiles samples used is less than the recommended value of 370 Bq/kg set in by [3] report except PNT ceramic tile sample with a value of 391. 10 Bq/kg.
-
3.
The absorbed dose rate in air was found to range from 118.73 to 347.77 nGyh−1 with mean value of 177.61 nGyh−1, which is higher than international values of 55 nGyh−1 according to [41] and 84 nGyh−1 according to [3] by a factor of 3.2 and 2.1, respectively.
-
4.
The average value of Hex and Hin are 0.55 and 0.73 respectively which is lower than unity as recommended by [3] except for tile sample PNT ceramic.
-
5.
The result of annual effective dose rate show higher value in tile samples Virony (China), BN ceramic (Nigeria), PNT ceramic (Nigeria), Iris (Italy), BN ceramic (Spain) above recommended value of 1 mSv/yr but on the average value the annual effective dose rate is within the recommended limit. From the above result, it shows that the imported tiles such as Virony china, Iris (Italy) and BN ceramics (Spain) for building purposes should be monitored for other materials before a comprehensive conclusion will be drawn for its usage in Nigeria.
-
6.
The mean values of gamma activity index and alpha index for the tiles used in Nigeria are 0.74 Sv yr−1 and 0.32 Sv yr−1 respectively except for the PNT ceramics and this tile should be monitored before usage for building purposes.
Acknowledgements
The researchers appreciate Covenant University Ota for the grants given to embark on this research for the safety of our nation through Research Management Center Grant Scheme Number: CUCRID/VC/17/02/02/06-FS. Also, appreciation goes to Radiation Geophysics Research Group, Department of Physics, Covenant University Ota, for their scientific contribution to this work.
Contributor Information
E.S. Joel, Email: emmanuel.joel@covenantuniversity.edu.ng.
O. Maxwell, Email: maxwell.omeje@covenantuniversity.edu.ng.
References
- 1.Amin S.A., Naji M. Natural radioactivity in different commercial ceramic samples used in Yemeni buildings. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2013;86:37–41. [Google Scholar]
- 2.UNSCEAR . UN; New York: 1993. Exposure From Natural Sources of Radiation. Report to the General Assembly. [Google Scholar]
- 3.UNSCEAR . UN; New York: 2000. Sources, Effects, and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sharma N., Singh J., Esakki S.C., Tripathi R.M. A study of the natural radioactivity and radon exhalation rate in some cements used in India and its radiological significance. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2016:47–56. [Google Scholar]
- 5.ICRP Protection of the public in situations of prolonged radiation exposure. Ann. ICRP. 1999;29(1–2) (Publication 82, Elsevier Sciences, B.V. International Commission on Radiological Protection) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Papastefanou C., Stoulos S., Manolopoulou M. The radioactivity of building materials. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2005;266:367–372. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xinwei L., Lingqing W., Xiaodan J., Leipeng Y., Gelian D. Specific activity and hazards of Archeozoic–Cambrian rock samples collected from the Weibei area of Shaanxi, China. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2006;118:352–359. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Matiullah Ahad A., Rehman S., Rehman S., Faheem M. Measurement of radioactivity in the soil of Bahawalpur Division, Pakistan. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2004;112:443–447. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rahaman S., Matiullah Mujahid A.S., Hussain S. Assessment of radiological hazards due to the presence of natural radionuclides in samples of building materials collected from the northwestern areas of Pakistan. J. Radiol. Prot. 2008;28:205–212. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/28/2/004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sharaf J.M., Hamideen M.S. Measurement of natural radioactivity in Jordanian building materials and their contribution to the public indoor amma dose rate. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2013;80:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lu X., Chao S., Yang G. Determination of natural radioactivity and associated radiation hazard in building materials used in Weinan, China. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2014:62–67. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beretka J., Mathew P.J. Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial waste sand by-products. Health Phys. 1985;48:87–95. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198501000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ngachin M., Garavaglia M., Giovani C., Njock M.G.K., Nourreddine A. Assessment of natural radioactivity and associated radiation hazards in some Cameroonian building materials. Radiat. Meas. 2007;42:61–67. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Faheem M., Mujahid S.A., Matiullah Assessment of radiological hazards due to the natural radioactivity in soil and building material samples collected from six districts of the Punjab province-Pakistan. Radiat. Meas. 2008;43:1443–1447. [Google Scholar]
- 15.El-Taher A., Makhluf S., Nossair A., AbdelHalim A.S. Assessment of natural radioactivity levels and radiation hazards due to cement industry. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2010;68:169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hussain H.H., Hussain R.O., Yousef R.M., Shamkhi Q. Natural radioactivity of some local building materials in the middle Euphrates of Iraq. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2010;284:43–47. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mavi B., Akkurt I. Natural radioactivity and radiation hazards in some building materials used in Isparta, Turkey. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2010;79:933–937. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moharram B.M., Suliman M.N., Zahran N.F., Shennawy S.E., ElSayed A.R. External exposure doses due to gamma emitting natural radionuclides in some Egyptian building materials. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2012;70:241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Al-Sulaiti H., Alkhomashi N., Al-Dahan N., Al-Dosari M., Bradley D.A., Bukhari S., Matthews M., Regan P.H., Santawamaitre T. Determination of the natural radioactivity in Qatarian building materials using high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometry. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 2011;652:915–919. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Damla N., Cevik U., Kobya A.I., Celik A., Celik N., Yıldırım I. Assessment of natural radioactivity and mass attenuation coefficients of brick and roofing tile used in Turkey. Radiat. Meas. 2011;46:701–708. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ravisankar R., Vanasundari K., Chandrasekaran A., Rajalakshmi A., Suganya M., Vijayagopal P., Meenakshisundaram V. Measurement of natural radioactivity in building materials of Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India using gamma-ray spectrometry. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2012;70:699–704. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tufan M.Ç., Dişci T. Natural radioactivity measurements in building materials used in Samsun, Turkey. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2013;156:87–92. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nct047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tsoulfanidis N. Taylor and Francis; 1995. Measurement and Detection of Radiation. [Google Scholar]
- 24.IAEA . International Atomic Energy Agency; 1989. Technical Reports, Series No: 295. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alnour I., Wagiran H., Ibrahim N., Laili Z., Omar M., Hamzah S., Idi B.Y. Natural radioactivity measurements in the granite rock of quarry sites, Johor, Malaysia. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012;81(12):1842–1847. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ibrahim N.M., El Abd, Ghani A.H., Shawky S.M., Ashraf E.M., Faruk M.A. Measurement of radioactivity level in soil in Nile Delta and Middle Egypt. Health Phys. 1993;4:620–627. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199306000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Maxwell O., Wagiran H., Ibrahim N., Lee S.K., Soheil S. Comparison of 238U 232Th, and 40K in different layers of subsurface structuresion Dei-Dei and Kubwa, Abuja, North Central Nigeria. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2013;91:70–80. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Supian B.S., Evans C.J. 1992. Statistics and Nuclear Counting: Theory, Problems and Solutions Statistics and Errors in Measurements. pp. 26–35. [Google Scholar]
- 31.International Atomic Energy Agency . 2003. Extent of Environmental Contamination by Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) and Technological Options for Mitigation, Technical Reports Series No. 419, STI/DOC/010/419. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tufail M., Ahmed N., Almakky S., Zafar M., Khan H. Natural radioactivity in the ceramic used in dwellings as construction material. Sci. Total Environ. 1992;127(3):243–253. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Higgy R. Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University; Cairo, Egypt: 1995. Measurements and Analyses of Low Level Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials and Evaluation of Its Environmental Impact. Ph.D. Thesis. pp. 130–136. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ahmed N. Measurements of natural radioactivity in building materials in Qena City—Upper Egypt. Proceedings of the 4th Radiation Physics Conference; Alexandria—Egypt; 1999. pp. 15–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Amarani A., Tahtat M. Natural radioactivity in Algerian building materials. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2001;54(4):687–689. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00304-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hilal M. Faculty of Science, University of Mansoura; Egypt: 2002. Nuclear Spectroscopic Measurements for Different Environmental Radiations. Ph.D. Thesis. (p. 138) [Google Scholar]
- 37.Xinwei L. Radioactivity level in Chinese building ceramic tile. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2004;112(2):323–327. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Righi S., Bruzzi L. Natural radioactivity and radon exhalation in building materials used in Italian dwellings. J. Environ. Radioact. 2006;88:158–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dabayneh K.M. Natural radioactivity in different commercial ceramic samples used in Palestine buildings as construction materials. Herbron Univ. Res. J. 2008;3(2):49–58. [Google Scholar]
- 40.EC . Radiation Protection. 1999. Radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials; p. 112. [Google Scholar]
- 41.UNSCEAR . United Nations; New York: 1998. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiations. [Google Scholar]
- 42.OECD (Organization for Economic Co- operation and Development) 1979. Exposure to Radiation from Radioactivity in Building Materials. (Report by a group of experts of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency) [Google Scholar]
- 43.ICRP Protection against Rn-222 at home and at work. Ann. ICRP. 1994;23(2):1–48. (ICRP publication 65; Ann [367]) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.RPA . Statens stralskyddsinstitut; Stockholm: 2000. Naturally Occurring Radiation in the Nordic Countries: Recommendations. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tufail M., Nasim A., Sabiha J., Tehsin H. Natural radioactivity hazards of building bricks fabricated from soil of two districts of Pakistan. J. Radiol. Prot. 2007;27:481–492. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/27/4/009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]