Abstract
The mammalian Hippo signaling pathway has been implicated in the self-renewal and differentiation of stem and progenitor cells. MST1 and MST2 (MST1/2) are core serine-threonine kinases in the Hippo signaling pathway, one of which, MST1, has been extensively investigated for its role in T cell and myeloid cell function. These studies have identified MST1 as a promising therapeutic target in immunological disease. However, the roles of MST1/2 in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) function in vivo are not fully understood. Here, we report that mice with a conditional deletion of Mst1/2 exhibit impaired hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) function under stress condition. Furthermore, Mst1/2 deletion markedly altered mature cell output. Therefore, MST1/2 are indispensable for maintenance as well as function of stem and progenitor cells under steady state conditions and with transplantation stress.
Introduction
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) mainly reside in the microenvironments in the bone marrow (BM), where they pass through multiple developmental steps to produce mature blood cells1,2. During hematopoietic stresses, such as injury, infection and niche disruption, HSCs become activated and participate in tissue generation, maintenance, and repair2,3. Under homeostatic conditions, HSCs preserve the potential for long-term self-renewal that retains stemness during division4 and the capacity for subsequent reconstitution5. However, under stress condition such as serial transplantation, HSCs can lose their capacity for self-renewal and reconstitution, a phenomenon referred to as stem cell exhaustion5. For the successful bone marrow transplantation, HSCs have to be engrafted into bone microenvironment and then be expanded. In other words, the key factors for reconstitution of HSC transplantation is the efficiency of HSC engraftment/homing and retention in the BM niche6. HSC homing and engraftment depend on the chemotactic axis7.
The Hippo pathway regulates the self-renewal and differentiation of stem and progenitor cells, and plays key roles in controlling organ size and regeneration8–12. Mammalian sterile-20 kinase 1 and 2 (Mst1/2), mammalian homologs of Hippo, are a core pair of serine-threonine kinase in the Hippo signaling pathway that regulate the cell cycle and apoptosis13–16. MST1/2 have also been implicated in hepatocellular sarcoma, intestinal adenocarcinoma, and lymphoma. Mst1/2 are expressed in most organs as well as the hematopoietic system17. Early studies identified an important role for MST1 and RAPL, an alternatively spliced form of RASSF5 (Ras association domain family member 5) that interacts with MST1, in lymphocyte trafficking and migration through integrin signaling18. Studies of Mst1-deficient mice have demonstrated that MST1 regulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through FOXO3A (forkhead box O3A), thereby preventing apoptosis of peripheral T cells14. In addition, it was recently shown that MST1/2 are capable of regulating NF-κB signaling in myeloid cells under conditions of infection19. MST1/2 also participate in the regulation of hematopoietic and endothelial progenitors in Xenopus20. These observations indicate that MST1/2 are important in hematopoietic cells; however, little is known about the roles of MST1/2 in HSC regulation.
In this study, we found that Mst1/2 control the production of mature hematopoietic cells. In addition, HSCs were functionally impaired in mice in which Mst1/2 were conditionally deleted, as evidenced by alterations in the steady-stated HSC population in BM and impaired function of Mst1/2-deficient HSCs under stress conditions. Mst1/2-deficient cells also showed a poor ability to engraft into BM compared with control cells. These data suggest that inefficient engraftment of Mst1/2-deficient BM cells in a transplantation setting is attributable to decreased homing ability. Collectively, our findings suggest that MST1 and MST2 regulate HSC function.
Material and Methods
Animal studies
Mst1Floxed/Floxed mice, kindly provided by Dr. T. Kinashi (Kansai Medical University), were interbred with conventional Mst2-knockout mice, after which Mst1fl/fl;Mst2-/-;Mx1-Cre mice were generated by crossing with a Mx1-Crestrain mouse21,22. For induction of Cre expression, Mst1fl/fl;Mst2-/-;Mx1-Cre mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with pIpC (polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid) every 2 days for 2 weeks23,24. For BM transplantation, lethally irradiated recipient mice were intravenously (i.v.) transplanted with competitor BM cells (0.5–2×106) from CD45.1 mice and test BM cells (0.5–2×106) from control or Mst1/2 double-knockout (DKO) mice. All mice were kept in a specific pathogen-free facility at Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST). The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of KAIST approved all of the following research protocols (approval ID: KA2010–23), including the surgical procedures and animal care, and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Flow cytometric analysis
Flow cytometry was performed as described previously24. BM cells were collected from femurs and tibias by flushing with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer, consisting of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 0.1% sodium azide. Splenocytes were obtained by mincing spleens on a 40-μm cell strainer with FACS buffer. Peripheral blood cells were collected from the tail vein or heart. White blood cell preparations were obtained after lysing red blood cells with an ammonium-chloride-potassium (ACK) lysis buffer. White blood cells were detected with biotin-conjugated antibodies against CD4 (RM4–5), CD8a (53–6.7), GR1 (RB6–8C5), CD11b (3A33), B220 (RA3–6B2), Nk1.1 (PK136) and TER119; LSKs (Lin−Sca1+cKit+ cells) were detected using Sca1-PE-Cy7 (D7) and cKit-APC (2B8) antibodies.
BrdU incorporation assay
Cells were obtained from mice 4 hours after injecting with BrdU (100 mg/kg, i.p.). Cells were then fixed, permeabilized and immunostained for cell surface markers (as detailed above) and BrdU using a BrdU FITC kit (BD Biosciences) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
Short-term engraftment assay
Short-term engraftment assays were performed by transplanting 3 × 107 BM cells from Mst1/2-deficient or control (CD45.2+) mice into CD45.1+ mice. Three weeks after transplantation, donor cell chimerism was examined in BM, spleen, and thymus.
Homing assay
Homing assays were performed by transplanting carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labeled BM cells (4 × 106) from Mst1/2-deficient or control mice into lethally irradiated recipient mice. Sixteen hours after transplantation, CFSE+ cells were assessed in BM, spleen, and peripheral blood (PB).
Colony Formation Assays
For assessing hematopoietic progenitor cell activity, BM, spleen, and PB cells were counted and plated in methylcellulose medium (M3434, STEMCELL Technologies)24. The colony number is counted 7 days after plating.
Statistics
Sample sizes required for experiments were estimated based on preliminary results. No blinding or randomization was performed for any of the experiments. The statistical significance of differences between population means was assessed by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, unless otherwise indicated. Statistically significant differences (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01) for pairwise comparisons between the indicated data points are shown. Statistical comparisons between individual data points and groups were not performed. The Kaplan-Meier log-rank test was used to analyze mouse survival data.
Results
Effects of Mst1/2 conditional deletion on mature cell subsets under homeostatic conditions
To investigate the role of MST1 and MST2 in HSPCs, we crossed Mst1floxed/floxed;Mst2−/− mice with Mx1-Cre transgenic mice21,22 in which Cre recombinase is activated by administration of pIpC24. Consistent with previous studies on lymphopenia14, B cells were dramatically decreased in the BM, spleen and peripheral blood (PB) from Mst1floxed/floxed;Mst2−/−;Mx1-Cre mice (referred to as DKO; Fig. 1A). However, mild T cell lymphopenia was detected (data not shown). We also found that DKO mice showed erythropenia in the BM and myeloid expansion in BM, spleen, and PB (Fig. 1A).
The absolute numbers of Lin−Sca1+cKit+ cells (LSKs), HSCs (Lin−Sca1+cKit+CD150+CD48−), and cycling HSCs (Lin−Sca1+cKit+CD150+CD48+) among BM cells from DKO mice were greater than those from control mice (Fig. 1B and Fig. S2). In addition, lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitors (LMPPs; Lin− Sca1+cKit+CD34+FLT3+), common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs; Lin− Sca1lowcKitlow CD127+), common myeloid progenitors (CMPs; Lin−Sca1−cKit+CD34+CD16/32−) and granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs; Lin−Sca1−cKit+CD34+CD16/32+) among BM cells from DKO mice were also increased in number, exhibiting increases comparable to or slightly less than those of HSCs (Fig. 1B). Mst1/2 deletion also led to a decrease in megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors (MEPs; Lin−Sca1−cKit+CD34−CD16/32−) in the BM and a concomitant decrease in the number of erythroid cells in the BM (Fig. 1A,B). Finally, Mst1/2-deficient progenitors could grow ex vivo into colonies than that of control (Fig. 1C).
This HSC expansion phenotype also manifested in conventional Mst1-knockout mice. Notably, the absolute numbers of each HSC compartment in Mst1-deficient mice were also increased owing to a similar or slightly increased number of total BM cells compared with that in wild-type (WT) mice (Fig. S1A). However, conventional Mst2-knockout mice showed a modest increase in HSCs and progenitors (Fig. S1B). These results suggest that MST1/2 could function to limit the size of the HSC pool.
The expansion of HSC-enriched populations in Mst1/2-DKO mice is caused by increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis
To determine the cause of increased HSCs, we performed BrdU-incorporation assays in vivo. The proliferative activity of the HSC compartments, LSK and LSKFLT3-, were both increased in Mst1/2-DKO mice (Fig. 2A,B). It has been reported that MST1/2 kinases are crucial in mediating/promoting apoptosis under conditions that stimulate apoptosis17. Therefore, we analyzed whether altered apoptosis could contribute to the expansion of HSCs in Mst1/2-DKO mice. We found that there were fewer apoptotic (annexin V+/DAPI−) cells in HSC compartments from the Mst1/2-DKO mouse (Fig. 2C,D). These data indicate that MST1/2 maintain HSC pools in vivo through regulation of proliferation and apoptosis.
HSCs were not exhausted in 6-month-old Mst1/2-DKO mice
Increased proliferation of HSCs leads to stem cell exhaustion, as exemplified by conditional Pten-deficient mice, which show stem cell depletion within 6 weeks after induction of Pten knockout (pIpC injection)25. To determine whether stem cells are depleted in Mst1/2-deficient mice, we analyzed the frequency of cells in HSC compartments 6 months after induction of Mst1/2 deletion by injection of pIpC (Fig. 3A and B). The frequencies of LSKs, HSCs and cycling HSCs were increased to levels similar to those in 3-week-old DKO mice, indicating that Mst1/2 DKO does not cause stem cell exhaustion. These data suggest that expansion of HSC numbers continued after Mst1/2 deletion and that the pools of these cells were maintained. Further, B cells were dramatically decreased in the BM, spleen and peripheral blood (PB) from in 6-month-old DKO mice as described before26 (Fig. 3C). We also found that DKO mice showed erythropenia in the BM and myeloid expansion in BM, spleen, and PB from in 6-month-old DKO mice. Collectively, we speculate that the reason why MST1/2 may expand HSC without exhaustion might be because MST1 and 2 modulate several functionally important targets in the other pathways that regulate an HSC program.
MST1/2 are required for HSC function under conditions of stress
To further test the function of Mst1/2-deficient HSCs, we transplanted BM cells from pIpC injected control or Mst1/2-DKO (CD45.2 cells) mice together with competitor cells into lethally irradiated CD45.1 mice. Competitors provided normal mature blood cells after reconstitution. Three weeks after transplantation, mice transplanted with Mst1/2-deficient cells displayed significantly diminished repopulation of mature blood cells compared with WT controls (Fig. 4A). This was caused by a decrease in HSCs and progenitor compartments of Mst1/2-deficient cells in transplanted recipient compared with control recipients (Fig. 4B). To examine donor chimerism of test cells following transplantation, we monitored repopulation maintenance in mice for 4 months. All cell lineages were detected throughout this period after transplantation, although the populations were lower than those in controls (Fig. 4C) and Mst1/2-deficient HSPCs were less well maintained at 4 months (Fig. 4D).
To determine whether Mst1/2-deficient HSCs are capable of surviving under secondary stress conditions, we performed a second transplantation of primary transplanted control and Mst1/2-deficient cells. We found that each hematopoietic cell lineage was less effectively reconstituted by Mst1/2-deficient HSCs. As was the case for primary transplantation, the reconstitution efficiency of secondarily transplanted Mst1/2-deficient cells was lower than that of control cells (Fig. 4E). These results indicate that MST1 and MST2 regulate BM engraftment efficiency.
The reduced homing activity of Mst1/2-deficient cells results in defective engraftment
Engraftment efficiency can be determined by homing ability and/or proliferation/differentiation. Based on the increased HSC proliferation in Mst1/2-deficient mice, we suspected a defect in homing ability or engraftment efficiency of Mst1/2-deficient cells. To test short-term engraftment, we transplanted control or Mst1/2-deficient BM cells into non-irradiated CD45.1 recipient mice and examined donor cell chimerism in BM, spleen and thymus 3 weeks post-transplantation. Mst1/2-deleted HSPCs showed a decreased frequency of donor cell chimerism compared with controls (Fig. 5A,B). We further assessed the homing ability of Mst1/2-deficient BM cells by transplanting CFSE-labeled control or Mst1/2-deficient BM cells into lethally irradiated CD45.1 recipient mice and examining CFSE+ cells in BM, spleen and PB 16 hours post-transplantation. Fewer resident Mst1/2-deficient cells were found in BM, spleen, and PB of recipient mice compared with transplanted control cells (Fig. 5C). Collectively, these data suggest that the regulation of HSC engraftment by MST1 and MST2 is due, at least in part, to effects on the homing step.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that an Mst1/2 deficiency leads to defects in the hematopoietic system. First, we found that Mst1/2 deletion markedly altered mature cell output. Conditional Mst1/2-deficient mice exhibited severe B cell lymphopenia, and an increase in the myeloid cell population and mild erythropenia in BM, spleen, and PB. Second, we found that the loss of Mst1/2 caused an increase in the steady state HSC population, a phenotype attributable to increased proliferation and reduced apoptosis of HSCs. However, stem cell exhaustion was not observed in 6-month-old Mst1/2-DKO mice, indicating that Mst1/2-deficient HSCs had expanded and were capable of maintaining their pools in the BM. Third, Mst1/2 knockout in HSCs did not induce hyperplasia or spontaneous hematopoietic neoplasms up to the time of death (D.H. Lee, D. Lee and D.S. Lim, unpublished data).
We further found that the function of Mst1/2-deficient HSCs was impaired under stress conditions. Mst1/2-deficient recipient mice exhibited fewer mature cells in PB and significantly decreased HSC chimerism in BM compared with controls. Interestingly, Mst1/2-deleted BM cells showed a decreased frequency of donor cell chimerism and differences in their short-term engraftment (3 weeks) and homing (16 hours) ability compared with controls under acute transplantation stress conditions. These data suggest that the inefficient engraftment of Mst1/2-deficient BM cells in the acute stress transplantation setting is attributable to decreased homing ability. Collectively, our findings suggest that Mst1 and Mst2 regulate HSC function in a setting of acute stress.
Numerous studies have reported that MST1 and MST2 are important in T cell migration18,27,28. By extension, it is reasonable to suggest that MST1 and MST2 are also essential for HSC migration into BM and adhesion to the BM microenvironment. Consistent with this, Mst1/2-deficient HSCs accumulated abnormally in PB and spleen, a phenomenon caused by defective HSC retention in the BM niche. Accordingly, we suggest that MST1 and MST2 will prove to be key factors for improving future human HSC transplantation therapies using cord blood or adult blood. In summary, MST1 and MST2 control the production of mature hematopoietic cells and play an indispensable role in the maintenance and function of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Creative Research Initiative Program (2010–0018277 to D.S.L.), the Convergence Medical Institute of Technology R&D Project Pusan National University Hospital (CMIT2017–02 to D.L.), the UDEOG Yoon Duck Byung Foundation (to D.L.), and Pusan National University Research Grant, 2017 (to D.L.), the Korea Foundation for Cancer Research (KFCR-2013–003 to D.H.L.) and Individual Basic Science & Engineering Research Program (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03935764 to D.H.L.). The data reported in this manuscript are tabulated in the main paper and in supplementary materials.
Author Contributions
D.H.L. and T.S.K. designed research, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. D.L. and D.S.L. directed research and wrote the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-19637-y.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Dongjun Lee, Email: lee.dongjun@pusan.ac.kr.
Dae-Sik Lim, Email: daesiklim@kaist.ac.kr.
References
- 1.Adams GB, Scadden DT. The hematopoietic stem cell in its place. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:333–337. doi: 10.1038/ni1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scadden DT. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature. 2006;441:1075–1079. doi: 10.1038/nature04957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Trumpp A, Essers M, Wilson A. Awakening dormant haematopoietic stem cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:201–209. doi: 10.1038/nri2726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Orford KW, Scadden DT. Deconstructing stem cell self-renewal: genetic insights into cell-cycle regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:115–128. doi: 10.1038/nrg2269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Purton LE, Scadden DT. Limiting factors in murine hematopoietic stem cell assays. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ratajczak MZ, Suszynska M. Emerging Strategies to Enhance Homing and Engraftment of Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 2016;12:121–128. doi: 10.1007/s12015-015-9625-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pelus LM, Fukuda S. Chemokine-mobilized adult stem cells; defining a better hematopoietic graft. Leukemia. 2007;22:466–473. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2405021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Camargo FD, et al. YAP1 increases organ size and expands undifferentiated progenitor cells. Curr Biol. 2007;17:2094–2094. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pan DJ. Hippo signaling in organ size control. Gene Dev. 2007;21:886–897. doi: 10.1101/gad.1536007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mo JS, Park HW, Guan KL. The Hippo signaling pathway in stem cell biology and cancer. Embo Rep. 2014;15:642–656. doi: 10.15252/embr.201438638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hayashi S, Yokoyama H, Tamura K. Roles of Hippo signaling pathway in size control of organ regeneration. Dev Growth Differ. 2015;57:341–351. doi: 10.1111/dgd.12212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Irvine, K.D. & Harvey, K.F. Control of Organ Growth by Patterning and Hippo Signaling in Drosophila. Csh Perspect Biol7 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Zhou D, et al. The Nore1B/Mst1 complex restrains antigen receptor-induced proliferation of naive T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:20321–20326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810773105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Choi J, et al. Mst1-FoxO signaling protects Naive T lymphocytes from cellular oxidative stress in mice. PLoS One. 2009;4:e8011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou D, et al. Mst1 and Mst2 maintain hepatocyte quiescence and suppress hepatocellular carcinoma development through inactivation of the Yap1 oncogene. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:425–438. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou D, et al. Mst1 and Mst2 protein kinases restrain intestinal stem cell proliferation and colonic tumorigenesis by inhibition of Yes-associated protein (Yap) overabundance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:E1312–1320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110428108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thompson BJ, Sahai E. MST kinases in development and disease. J Cell Biol. 2015;210:871–882. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201507005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Katagiri K, Imamura M, Kinashi T. Spatiotemporal regulation of the kinase Mst1 by binding protein RAPL is critical for lymphocyte polarity and adhesion. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:919–928. doi: 10.1038/ni1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Geng J, et al. Kinases Mst1 and Mst2 positively regulate phagocytic induction of reactive oxygen species and bactericidal activity. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:1142–1152. doi: 10.1038/ni.3268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haramoto Y, Takahashi S, Nejigane S, Michiue T, Asashima M. Hippo signaling components, Mst1 and Mst2, act as a switch between self-renewal and differentiation in Xenopus hematopoietic and endothelial progenitors. Int J Dev Biol. 2013;57:407–414. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.130010st. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kuhn R, Schwenk F, Aguet M, Rajewsky K. Inducible gene targeting in mice. Science. 1995;269:1427–1429. doi: 10.1126/science.7660125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Park D, et al. Endogenous bone marrow MSCs are dynamic, fate-restricted participants in bone maintenance and regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee D, Kim T, Lim DS. The Er71 Is an Important Regulator of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Adult Mice. Stem Cells. 2011;29:539–548. doi: 10.1002/stem.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kalaitzidis D, et al. Amino acid-insensitive mTORC1 regulation enables nutritional stress resilience in hematopoietic stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:1405–1413. doi: 10.1172/JCI89452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yilmaz OH, et al. Pten dependence distinguishes haematopoietic stem cells from leukaemia-initiating cells. Nature. 2006;441:475–482. doi: 10.1038/nature04703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bai XM, et al. Mst1 positively regulates B-cell receptor signaling via CD19 transcriptional levels. Blood Adv. 2016;1:219–230. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016000588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dang TS, et al. Defective Leukocyte Adhesion and Chemotaxis Contributes to Combined Immunodeficiency in Humans with Autosomal Recessive MST1 Deficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2016;36:117–122. doi: 10.1007/s10875-016-0232-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mou F, et al. The Mst1 and Mst2 kinases control activation of rho family GTPases and thymic egress of mature thymocytes. J Exp Med. 2012;209:741–759. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.