Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: Protein Expr Purif. 2017 Jan 18;132:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2017.01.007

Expression of a soluble truncated Vargula luciferase in Escherichia coli

Eric A Hunt a,b,1, Angeliki Moutsiopoulou a,b,1, David Broyles a, Trajen Head a, Emre Dikici a, Sylvia Daunert a, Sapna K Deo a,*
PMCID: PMC5772761  NIHMSID: NIHMS857056  PMID: 28108349

Abstract

Marine luciferases are regularly employed as useful reporter molecules across a range of various applications. However, attempts to transition expression from their native eukaryotic environment into a more economical prokaryotic, i.e. bacterial, expression system often presents several challenges. Specifically, bacterial protein expression inherently lacks chaperone proteins to aid in the folding process, while Escherichia coli presents a reducing cytoplasmic environment in. These conditions contribute to the inhibition of proper folding of cysteine-rich proteins, leading to incorrect tertiary structure and ultimately inactive and potentially insoluble protein. Vargula luciferase (Vluc) is a cysteine-rich marine luciferase that exhibits glow-type bioluminescence through a reaction between its unique native substrate and molecular oxygen. Because most other commonly used bioluminescent proteins exhibit flash-type emission kinetics, this emission characteristic of Vluc is desirable for high-throughput applications where stability of emission is required for the duration of data collection. A truncated form of Vluc that retains considerable bioluminescence activity (55%) compared to the native full-length protein has been reported in the literature. However, expression and purification of this luciferase from bacterial systems has proven difficult. Herein, we demonstrate the expression and purification of a truncated form of Vluc from E. coli. This truncated Vluc (tVluc) was subsequently characterized in terms of both its biophysical and bioluminescence properties.

Keywords: Vargula luciferase, Truncated protein, Bioluminescence, Bacterial expression

1. Introduction

Numerous marine luciferases, such as those from Renilla reniformis, Gaussia princeps, and Cypridina noctiluca [19], are commonly used as bioluminescent reporters across a range of applications such as biosensing, reporter gene assays, and gene expression studies. Another such reporter is Vargula luciferase (Vluc), from the ostracod crustacean Vargula hilgendorfii also known as the “sea firefly.” In 1989, Thompson et al. successfully cloned the cDNA for Vluc and expressed the full-length protein in a mammalian cell system. The complete primary sequence of Vluc consists of 555 amino acids, with two unique potential sites of glycosylation in its native organism [10,11]. The native substrate for Vluc, Vargula luciferin (vargulin), is also referred to as Cypridina luciferin due to the fact that the same substrate is utilized by the Cypridina noctiluca luciferase (Cluc) for bioluminescence emission. Although this substrate is similar to the more common luciferase substrate, coelenterazine, minor differences are observed in the substituents located around a conserved imidazopyrazine skeleton. However, the bioluminescent reaction for both substrates proceeds through a common dioxetanone intermediate that emits around 462 nm [12]. An important characteristic of Vluc bioluminescence is the extended, glow-type emission of light [13,14]. This unique kinetic property makes Vluc a desirable reporter for imaging and various bioluminescent assays, specifically allowing for the time-resolved, multiplexed detection of multiple targets.

Based on the determined sequence of the Vluc cDNA, it was established that the full-length protein contained two homologous domains, each with notable similarity to the photoprotein aequorin from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria [15]. This is a feature shared by many of marine luciferases including Gaussia, Metridia, and Cypridina. In terms of emission intensity, Vargula luciferase is significantly brighter (10- to 20-fold) as a gene reporter than the commonly utilized firefly luciferase. The unique substrate utilized by Vluc allows for its use as a multiplex reporter in conjunction with coelenterazine-dependent luciferases [16]. Additionally, the glow-type bioluminescence of Vluc provides a means to develop multiplexed systems based on time resolution of different luciferase signals. In 1996, Maeda et al. demonstrated that a fusion consisting of protein A with the N-terminal homologous domain of Vluc (P28-C312) could be expressed in a mammalian system, and retained ~40% of the full-length wild-type Vluc bioluminescent activity [10]. This fusion containing truncated Vluc (tVluc) enabled the bioluminescence-based detection of the anti-protein A antibody, opening up a range of novel applications for tVluc. However, the production of Vluc in bacterial systems has thus far remained elusive. Inouye and Sahara provide the only example of soluble Vluc production in E. coli, achieved through cold shock expression of a fusion consisting of the luciferase and a synthetic IgG-binding domain as a solubilizing partner [17]. However, the resulting fusion showed no bioluminescence activity, likely a result of improper protein folding. Moreover, inclusion of a fused solubility partner can lead to undesirable effects in downstream applications, such as binding interference or reduction of reporter activity. Although such additions can be subsequently removed via proteolytic cleavage, this process requires additional reagents and the necessity of a secondary purification step, reducing overall protein yield.

Thus, a major consideration for the successful soluble expression of Vargula luciferase in a bacterial system involves the proper folding of the protein – specifically the precise formation of cysteine-cysteine bonds. The truncated form of Vluc (tVluc), representing the N-terminal homologous domain of the full-length luciferase, contains only 16 of the 34 cysteine residues found in the wild-type protein. This reduction in possible disulfide bond formation requirements could make production in a bacterial system without a solubilizing partner more feasible, while simultaneously facilitating downstream applications that may require bioconjugation or cellular delivery. In this study, we demonstrate the successful bacterial expression of tVluc in a soluble and active form from E. coli and provide a complete characterization of its bioluminescent properties. It is believed that this work will help guide the further development of Vluc and Cluc luciferase variants for more efficient expression and purification from bacterial systems.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Molecular cloning

The 555 amino acid sequence for Vluc was obtained from the NCBI GenBank (accession number AAA30332, “luciferase [Vargula hilgendorfii]”) and was used to create the tVluc sequence for expression in E. coli. The signal peptide, which was identified using the online prediction tool provided by the Center for Biological Sequencing Analysis at the Technical University of Denmark [18], was predicted to be the first 15 amino acids of the native sequence and was not present in the truncated sequence.

The tVluc sequence used in this study consists of 302 amino acids with a theoretical molecular weight of 33.3 kDa and includes the Pro28–Cys312 segment of the native sequence with an N-terminal 6xHis tag and factor Xa cleavage site. The sequence was synthesized commercially (GeneCopoeia Inc., Rockville, Maryland) following codon optimization for expression in an E. coli host and inserted into the pCold-I Cold Shock Expression System vector (Takara Bio. Inc., Japan) using the NdeI (CA*TATG) and XhoI (C*TCGAG) restriction sites of the multiple cloning site (Fig. 1). The resulting pCold-I::tVluc (ptVluc) plasmid was then transformed into the cloning strain NEB5-α (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts) for propagation and storage.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The pCold-I Cold Shock Expression System introduces an N-terminal 6xHis tag followed by a factor Xa cleavage site for tag removal following purification. The gene of interest inserted into the multiple cloning site is under the control of the cspA promoter and lac operon for expression control. The vector imparts ampicillin resistance through the ampr gene encoding β-lactamase.

2.2. Expression and purification from Escherichia coli

After propagating the ptVluc via bacterial growth at 37 °C, the plasmid was purified using a QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California) and transformed into three different expression strains: NEB Express (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts), Origami 2 (Novagen - EMD Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts) and SHuffle® Express (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts). As a preliminary step to culture expansion, small cultures were prepared for overnight growth at 37 °C by inoculating 5 mL of Miller LB supplemented with 0.1 mg/mL ampicillin from glycerol stocks of tVluc for each of the three expression strains. Following overnight growth, the small cultures were centrifuged at 4000 × g, resuspended in fresh media supplemented with 0.1 mg/mL ampicillin, and used to inoculate large 250 mL cultures.

2.2.1. Protocol for NEB express

Large 250 mL cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.6 in Miller LB supplemented with 0.1 mg/mL ampicillin before initiating cold-shock on ice for 1 h. Cultures were then induced with a final concentration of 1 mM IPTG, followed by growth at 15 °C for 48 h. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 4000 × g and 4 °C for 20 min and resuspended in a lysis buffer of 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0, 300 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM imidazole, and 0.05% (vol.) polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate (Tween-20). The cells were lysed, following which the insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 17,000 × g and 4 °C for 20 min, and the supernatant was filtered by syringe through a 0.22 μm filter. The filtered crude protein was then incubated with 500 μL of Ni–NTA agarose (Qiagen, Valencia, California) per culture at 4 °C for 2 h, collected on a Pierce Centrifuge Column (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York) by gravity flow, and washed with 2 column volumes of a wash buffer of 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0, 300 mM sodium chloride, and 20 mM imidazole. The protein was then eluted in 500 μL increments with a stepwise gradient of imidazole in 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0, 300 mM sodium chloride (four column volumes were collected at each stepped concentration).

2.2.2. Protocol for Origami 2 expression

Large 250 mL cultures were grown to an OD600 of 1.6 in Terrific broth supplemented with 0.1 mg/mL ampicillin prior to induction of cold-shock on ice for 1 h. The media was then replenished, and overnight induction at 15 °C was initiated using a final concentration of 0.1 mM IPTG. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 4000 × g and 4 °C for 20 min and resuspended in a lysis buffer of 50 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM imidazole, 1% (vol.) nonyl phenoxypolyethoxylethanol (NP-40), 0.2% (vol.) Tween-20, and 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (β-ME). The cell suspension was supplemented with 1× ProBlock Gold Bacterial Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Gold Biotechnology Inc., St. Louis, Missouri) to prevent protein degradation following cell lysis. The insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g and 4 °C for 30 min, and the supernatant was filtered by syringe through a 0.22 μm filter.

The filtered crude protein was then incubated with 250 μL of Ni–NTA agarose per 250 mL culture at 4 °C for 1–2 h, collected on a centrifuge column by gravity flow, washed with 10 column volumes of lysis buffer followed by 20 column volumes of wash buffer containing 50 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM sodium chloride, and 20 mM imidazole. The protein was then eluted with elution buffer of 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM sodium chloride, and 150 mM imidazole in 1-column volume increments.

2.2.3. Protocol for SHuffle® express expression

SHuffle® Express proceeded similarly to the protocol for Origami 2, except that the large cultures were grown to an OD600 of 1.2 and were induced with a final concentration of 0.5 mM IPTG. The protein was bound to the Ni–NTA agarose for 30–45 min and subsequently purified in the same manner.

All purifications were analyzed by SDS-PAGE using 4–20% gradient Mini- PROTEAN® TGX Precast Gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, California) under denaturing conditions with running buffers containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).

The purified tVluc was then dialyzed into either phosphate buffered saline (PBS) consisting of 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.2 and 150 mM sodium chloride or a CD buffer consisting of 5 mM potassium phosphate and 25 mM ammonium sulfate pH 7.8, depending on the intended application following purification. Slide-A-Lyzer Dialysis Cassettes (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York) with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of 10 kDa were used.

2.3. Characterization of bioluminescence spectra

Bioluminescence measurements were carried out in a 96-well black polystyrene non-binding microplate (Greiner Bio-One Inc., Monroe, North Carolina). Cypridina luciferin (vargulin) was purchased from NanoLight Technology (Prolume Ltd., Pinetop, Arizona).

Briefly, 100 μL of 600 μM vargulin was injected into 100 μL of purified luciferase at a concentration of ~3.5 μM, and the spectrum was recorded. Using a CLARIOstar® microplate reader (BMG LAB-TECH GmbH, Ortenberg, Germany), the spectrum was scanned from 380 to 650 nm using 1 s/nm integration. Five separate spectra were recorded and averaged using GraphPad Prism 6 to produce the final spectrum.

2.4. Kinetic studies

Decay kinetics were obtained using a POLARstar® Optima (BMG LABTECH GmbH, Ortenberg, Germany). The emission filter was set to “lens” (i.e. no filter) and total light was collected for all measurements. All kinetic measurements were carried out in 96-well black polystyrene non-binding microplates (Greiner Bio-One Inc., Monroe, North Carolina). Cypridina luciferin (vargulin) was purchased from Nanolight Technology (Prolume Ltd., Pinetop, Arizona). Briefly, 100 μL of luciferase was added to a 96-well microplate at a concentration of 1.4 μM. The bioluminescent emission was quantified by integrating the signal in 10-second intervals for 20 min. At 30 s, 100 μL of 100 μM vargulin was injected to begin the reaction.

2.5. Circular dichroism spectroscopy

Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy was performed on a Jasco J-815 Circular Dichroism Spectropolarimeter using a 0.1 cm path length quartz cuvette. tVluc was dialyzed into CD buffer and diluted to a concentration of 0.05 mg/mL. The spectrum was acquired from 260 to 185 nm using the parameter set described in Table 1.

Table 1.

Parameter used for the circular dichroism spectroscopy.

Parameter Value
Scan Mode Continuous
Scan Speed 50 nm/min
Data Pitch 0.5 nm
Bandwidth 2 nm
D.I.T 2 s
Accumulations 5

2.6. Computational analysis of structure

All analysis of the CD spectrum was performed using DichroWeb (Department of Crystallography, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College, University of London, United Kingdom) [19]. The CDSSTR analysis program [20] was used to generate secondary structure assignments for tVluc using reference sets 3, 4, 6, 7, SP175, and SMP180. The CDSSTR analysis program was chosen as it provided the best fit to experimental data; however, all analysis programs available through DichroWeb including SEL-CON3, CONTIN, VARSLC, and K2D were evaluated. Data input for the analysis was limited to the wavelength range of 240–185 nm.

2.7. Vluc expression from mammalian cells

HEK293T cells were transfected with the plasmid, pCMV-VargLuc vector (Targeting Systems, El Cajo, CA) using the Xfect (Takara Bio Inc., Mountain View, CA) transfection reagent protocol. The cells were cultured using Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (ThermoFischer Scientific, Waltham, MA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), antibiotic and antimycotic in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. After 2 days of incubation, the culture supernatant was collected for the bioluminescence characterization of the expressed protein. The protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE using 4–20% gradient Mini- PROTEAN® TGX Precast Gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, California) under denaturing conditions with running buffers containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).

The pure, full-length Vluc was then dialyzed into phosphate buffered saline (PBS) consisting of 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.2 and 150 mM sodium chloride. Slide-A-Lyzer Dialysis Cassettes (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York) with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of 10 kDa was used.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular cloning of truncated Vargula luciferase

The pColdI::tVluc vector (ptVluc, Fig. 1b) was created by inserting a codon-optimized gene for tVluc into the pCold-I cold shock expression vector (Fig. 1a).

3.2. Expression and purification of truncated Vargula luciferase from E. coli

We evaluated three expression hosts of E. coli; NEB Express, Origami 2 and SHuffle® Express. Utilizing the NEB Express system, protein bands corresponding to tVluc were observed during SDS-PAGE analysis, but were extremely faint with protein elution beginning at 40 mM imidazole and completing before the 60 mM imidazole wash aliquot (data not shown). This result indicated that the N-terminal 6xHis tag may have been sequestered internally, while the observed lack of bioluminescent activity in the presence of vargulin suggested overall protein misfolding.

In contrast, the tVluc product obtained from Origami 2 expression showed a band observed in SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 2) corresponding to overexpressed and successfully isolated tVluc. Although bioluminescent activity of the protein-containing fraction was high (as verified from bioluminescence emission upon substrate addition), these elution fractions contained numerous contamination bands indicating overall poor purity of the recovered tVluc.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Molecular weight analysis of tVluc expressed in Origami 2 E. coli. Analysis of band migration was done using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and GraphPad Prism 6. The main over-expressed band was calculated to be 34 kDa. The theoretical molecular weight of tVluc is 33.3 kDa. The 66 kDa band may be evidence of dimerization. Lanes 1–2) flowthrough; 3) lysis buffer wash; 4) Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard; 4) wash buffer wash; 6–9) elution fractions.

Subsequently, a third strain of E. coli, SHuffle® Express was attempted for expression of tVluc. Expression from this strain produced active tVluc in an exceptionally pure form from the soluble fraction (Fig. 3), yielding approximately 1.5 mg of pure protein per 1 L culture. Because of its purity and yield, subsequent characterization of the bacterially-expressed tVluc was performed on protein obtained using this expression system.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Purification of tVluc from SHuffle® Express E. coli. Lanes 1) Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard; 2) flowthrough; 3) lysis buffer wash; 4) wash buffer wash; 5–7) elution fractions. The purified band was calculated to have a molecular weight of 35 kDa, while the theoretical molecular weight of tVluc is 33.3 kDa.

The SDS-PAGE analysis results from expression in both Origami 2 and SHuffle were further utilized to determine the molecular weight of the purified tVluc. From the expression performed in Origami 2 cells, four prominent bands were chosen from the elution fractions of the tVluc purification. The migration of each band in the Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, California) was measured using Photoshop CS6 and plotted with automated curve fitting in Prism 6 to extrapolate a precise molecular weight value for the over-expressed bands (Fig. 2). The most prominent over-expressed band was calculated to be 34 kDa, approximately the theoretical molecular weight of tVluc. Additionally, a 66 kDa band was observed, potentially representing the dimerization between individual tVluc monomers. A similar calculation was performed using SDS-PAGE analysis of purified tVluc from expression in Shuffle® Express cells (Fig. 3). As before, the migration of the bands of the protein standard were measured, and a molecular weight of approximately 35 kDa for purified tVluc was extrapolated from the resulting curve fit, corroborating the results demonstrated in the Origami 2 expression and purification.

As further confirmation of the successful purification of tVluc from Origami 2, Western blot analyses were performed using an anti-6xHis epitope tag antibody (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York) and an anti-Cypridina luciferase epitope antibody (antibodies-online Inc., Atlanta, Georgia). Because both Vargula and Cypridina luciferases share a high degree of homology (85% identity and 94% similarity in two sequences), we speculated that the polyclonal anti-cypridina antibody would be capable of binding tVluc. The anti-6xHis epitope tag antibody blot confirmed that largest over-expression band that was observed at ~34 kDa (Fig. 3) represented tVluc produced from the pCold-I cold shock expression system (Fig. 4). Although the anti-Cypridina blot did not generate any readable signal, the purified tVluc includes only the N-terminal domain of the full-length Vluc protein. Thus the epitope targeted by this antibody may have potentially been removed with truncation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Western blots of tVluc expressed in Origami 2 E. coli using anti-6xHis tag (left) and anti-Cluc (right) primary antibodies. No binding was observed for the anti-Cluc antibody, potentially due to epitope removal following truncation.

3.3. Expression and characterization of Vargula luciferase from HEK293T mammalian cells

Full-length Vluc was expressed using mammalian HEK293T cells. We observed only a single band at the expected size for full-length Vluc after loading the cell supernatant to the SDS-PAGE gel (Fig. 5a). It wasn’t required to do any purification since the protein was excreted selectively into the culture media of the mammalian HEK293T cells. Although the yield of the protein was low, the observed protein purity indicated a lack of need for further purification. This was sufficient for use as a control in our study. However, we would like to point out this method may not be appropriate for practical applications. We measured the bioluminescence activity of the full-length Vluc, and compared these values with the purified tVluc from SHuffle® Express E. coli (Fig. 5b). The bioluminescence activity of the purified tVluc was 45% of the full-length Vluc.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

a) SDS-PAGE gel of expression of Vluc from HEK293T mammalian cells. Lanes 1: Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard and Lane 2 the expressed Vluc. The band was calculated to have approximately a molecular weight 66 kDa. b) The bioluminescence activity of the matched concentration of full-length Vluc from HEK293T compared with the purified tVluc expressed from SHuffle® Express E. coli.

3.4. Secondary structure analysis of truncated Vargula luciferase by circular dichroism spectroscopy

After isolating purified tVluc expressed from SHuffle® Express, a CD spectrum was obtained was obtained from 260 to 180 nm (Fig. 6a) and analyzed by the CDSSTR analysis package to generate secondary structure assignments for the luciferase (Fig. 6b). The online secondary structure prediction server Phyre2 [21] was able to model ~65% of residues with a >90% confidence level (data not shown). While these types of ab initio structure analyses can vary widely in their accuracy, it was reassuring to note that the predicted model exhibited ~8% αr character and ~20% βr character. These values correspond well with the CDSSTR secondary structure assignments calculated from the obtained CD data (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(a) CD spectrum for tVluc and (b) secondary structure assignments made using the CDSSTR analysis program from DichroWeb.

3.5. Bioluminescent characteristics of truncated Vargula luciferase

Characterization of the bioluminescence properties of tVluc began with the acquisition of a complete bioluminescence emission spectrum (Fig. 7). Immediately following injection of vargulin into a sample of purified tVluc, emission intensity was measured from 380 to 650 nm. The emission profile of the purified tVluc exhibited a characteristic broad emission, with a maximum bioluminescence emission intensity occurring at approximately 510 nm.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Bioluminescence emission spectra of tVluc expressed using SHuffle® Express E. coli.

Examining the kinetic parameters of the tVluc bioluminescence, we determined that the purified protein exhibited a glow-type bioluminescent emission with a half-life of over two hours (Fig. 8b). The bioluminescence reaction occurs rapidly upon injection of the vargulin substrate and is well suited for high-throughput analytical applications where extended signal lifetime is necessary to compensate for delays in signal acquisition following simultaneous substrate injection.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

(a) The extended emission kinetics of tVluc with vargulin substrate. (b) The half-life was shown to extend beyond two hours.

4. Discussion

Within, we have presented a method for the soluble expression and successful purification of a truncated variant of Vargula luciferase (tVluc) from a prokaryotic (bacterial) system. The unique composition of the Vluc molecule, specifically the presence of numerous disulfide bonds within its tertiary structure, required that some specific considerations be made for the successful isolation of the tVluc reporter. These considerations included the choice of expression plasmid, expression temperature, fusion partners, etc. For example, the cold shock expression system, pColdI, was chosen for production of tVluc in E. coli due to the fact that growth at reduced temperature will slow the rate of protein production, thereby encouraging proper folding and reducing aggregation [22]. By using this expression vector with three different strains of E. coli, we examined various routes for maximum efficiency of tVluc production.

From SDS-PAGE analysis of NEB Express system as well as from the lack of the bioluminescent activity we concluded that N-terminal 6xHis tag might have been sequestered internally. On the other hand, the Origami 2 and SHuffle® Express gave promising results based on the resulting high bioluminescence activity.

The tVluc product obtained from Origami 2 was dramatically more tolerant of immobilized-metal affinity chromatography (IMAC), and stayed bound to the Ni–NTA agarose until eluted with a high concentration of imidazole giving the overexpression band (Fig. 2). This improvement was attributed to the thioredoxin reductase (trxB) and glutathione oxidoreductase (gor) mutations present in Origami2, which likely contributed to proper disulfide formation for the expression of active tVluc. Although the bioluminescent activity was high, the elution fractions contained numerous contamination bands, demonstrating that background protein expression was still a significant impediment to obtaining usable protein in this E. coli strain. Additionally, Origami 2 is derived from E. coli K12, and it is possible that it exhibits higher protease activity than other strains.

As such, a third strain of E. coli was attempted for expression of tVluc. Unlike the previously used cell lines, SHuffle® Express is an E. coli B strain which, in addition to being a trxB/gor mutant, also constitutively expresses a chromosomal copy of the disulfide bond isomerase DsbC. This enzyme is usually found in the periplasm of Gram-negative bacteria and functions to aid in the rearrangement of incorrectly formed disulfides [23]. Expression from this strain produced active tVluc in an exceptionally pure form from the soluble fraction (Fig. 3), yielding approximately 1.5 mg of pure protein per 1 L culture.

The similarity in predicted and observed protein structure composition lend validity to the assessment that tVluc is folding in a relatively consistent and predictable manner within the bacterial cytoplasmic environment. Although the remaining portion of the secondary structure was classified as disordered, this can result from solubility issues in low ionic strength buffer, and the truncation itself may lead to a more fluid tertiary structure in the absence of substrate. Further investigation using synchrotron radiation CD (SRCD) would be warranted only if tertiary structure variability was evident analytically.

In addition to the structural data obtained for this bacterial-expressed tVluc variant, the bioluminescence properties of the protein were also characterized. The bioluminescence activity of the newly isolated and purified tVluc has a 45% loss in activity compared to the full-length Vluc (Fig. 5b). This observation is congruent with findings in the literature which reported similar bioluminescence emission differences between the full-length and truncated Vluc variants [10]. The analysis of the bioluminescence emission spectrum revealed a broad peak with an emission maximum occurring at 510 nm (Fig. 8a). In comparison to the previously reported value for wild-type Vluc [24], this represents an approximately 50 nm red-shift. As demonstrated in Fig. 8b, tVluc exhibited a stable, glow-type emission following the addition of substrate, similar to the kinetics observed in full-length Vluc [11]. From this measurement, it was calculated that the isolated protein possessed an emission half-life of approximately two hours in buffer. Moreover, the ability to express and isolate tVluc in a bacterial system provides many advantageous benefits to its future incorporation into a range of bioluminescence-based reporter systems.

5. Conclusion

This work represents the first report of a successful expression and purification of a functional Vargula luciferase variant in a prokaryotic (bacterial) system. Critically, we have demonstrated that great care must be taken in the design and implementation of tVluc expression to ensure that the cytoplasmic environment and expression conditions are amenable to proper disulfide formation during folding. This bacterially-expressed tVluc was isolated as both soluble and pure, and exhibited a glow-type bioluminescent emission with a half-life of over two hours. This truncated form of the luciferase is slightly smaller than Renilla luciferase (39.5 kDa), providing potential for its use in biosensor-based applications where size is a critical factor [25]. This expression of tVluc in E. coli will be a guide for further production of Vargula and Cypridina luciferase variants, which will have unprecedented value in the design and implementation of multiplexed reporter systems.

Acknowledgments

SKD would like to thank the National Institute of General Medical Science funding (R01GM047915), the State of Florida Department of Health and the National Science Foundation (CHE-1506740). S.D. thanks the Miller School of Medicine of the University of Miami for the Lucille P. Markey Chair in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

Abbreviations

Vluc

Vargula luciferase

tVluc

truncated Vargula luciferase

Cluc

Cypridina noctiluca luciferase

LB

Luria Broth

OD

Optical density

IPTG

isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactopyranoside

Ni–NTA

Ni 2-nitrilotriacetic acid

NP-40

nonyl phenoxypolyethoxylethanol

β-ME

10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol

SDS-PAGE

sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PBS

phosphate buffered saline

MWCO

molecular weight cutoff

CD

Circular Dichroism

IMAC

immobilized-metal affinity chromatography

trxB

thioredoxin reductase

gor

glutathione oxidoreductase

SRCD

synchrotron radiation CD

References

  • 1.Wu C, Kawasaki K, Ohgiya S, Ohmiya Y. Syntheses and evaluation of the bioluminescent activity of (S)-Cypridina luciferin and its analogs. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:753–756. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hunt EA, Deo SK. Bioluminescent stem-loop probes for highly sensitive nucleic acid detection. Chem Commun. 2011;47:9393–9395. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13495g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hunt EA, Moutsiopoulou A, Ioannou S, Ahern K, Woodward K, Dikici E, Daunert S, Deo SK. Truncated variants of Gaussia luciferase with tyrosine linker for site-specific bioconjugate applications. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26814. doi: 10.1038/srep26814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kumar M, Zhang DH, Broyles D, Deo SK. A rapid, sensitive, and selective bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based nucleic acid sensing system. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;30:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cissell KA, Rahimi Y, Shrestha S, Deo SK. Reassembly of a bioluminescent protein Renilla luciferase directed through DNA hybridization. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:15–19. doi: 10.1021/bc8003099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cissell KA, Rahimi Y, Shrestha S, Hunt EA, Deo SK. Bioluminescence-based detection of MicroRNA, miR21 in breast cancer cells. Anal Chem. 2008;80:2319–2325. doi: 10.1021/ac702577a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Verhaegen M, Christopoulos TK. Recombinant Gaussia luciferase. Over-expression, purification, and analytical application of a bioluminescent reporter for DNA hybridization. Anal Chem. 2002;74:4378–4385. doi: 10.1021/ac025742k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kumar M, Kovalski L, Broyles D, Hunt EA, Daftarian P, Dikici E, Daunert S, Deo SK. Design and development of high bioluminescent resonance energy transfer efficiency hybrid-imaging constructs. Anal Biochem. 2016;498:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.11.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scott D, Dikici E, Ensor M, Daunert S. Bioluminescence and its impact on bioanalysis. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif. 2011;4:297–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061010-113855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maeda Y, Ueda H, Kazami J, Kawano G, Suzuki E, Nagamune T. Truncation of Vargula luciferase still results in retention of luminescence. J Biochem. 1996;119:601–603. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thompson EM, Nagata S, Tsuji FI. Cloning and expression of Cdna for the luciferase from the marine ostracod Vargula-hilgendorfii. P Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:6567–6571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.17.6567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dobbs Megan, Hughes Douglas, Narahari Janaki, Choi Jae, Los Georgyi, Webb Brian. Simultaneous Dual-emission Detection of Luciferase Reporter Assays. BMG LABTECH. 2013:A.N. 233. http://www.bmglabtech.com/en/applications/
  • 13.Kricka LJ. Chemiluminescent and bioluminescent techniques. Clin Chem. 1991;37:1472–1481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.A new secreted luciferase optimized to advance cell based reporter technology, http://www.invivogen.com/review-lucia.
  • 15.Thompson EM, Nagata S, Tsuji FI. Cloning and expression of cDNA for the luciferase from the marine ostracod Vargula hilgendorfii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:6567–6571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.17.6567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tannous BA, Kim DE, Fernandez JL, Weissleder R, Breakefield XO. Codon-optimized Gaussia luciferase cDNA for mammalian gene expression in culture and in vivo. Mol Ther. 2005;11:435–443. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Inouye S, Sahara Y. Soluble protein expression in E. coli cells using IgG-binding domain of protein A as a solubilizing partner in the cold induced system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;376:448–453. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.08.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:953–971. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Whitmore L, Wallace BA. Protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopy: methods and reference databases. Biopolymers. 2008;89:392–400. doi: 10.1002/bip.20853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sreerama N, Venyaminov SY, Woody RW. Estimation of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra: inclusion of denatured proteins with native proteins in the analysis. Anal Biochem. 2000;287:243–251. doi: 10.1006/abio.2000.4879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJE. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rosano GL, Ceccarelli EA. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:172. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haebel PW, Goldstone D, Katzen F, Beckwith J, Metcalf P. The disulfide bond isomerase DsbC is activated by an immunoglobulin-fold thiol oxidoreductase: crystal structure of the DsbC-DsbD alpha complex. Embo J. 2002;21:4774–4784. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Thompson EM, Nagata S, Tsuji FI. Vargula-hilgendorfii luciferase - a secreted reporter enzyme for monitoring gene-expression in mammalian-cells. Gene. 1990;96:257–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hunt EA, Deo SK. Bioluminescent stem-loop probes for highly sensitive nucleic acid detection. Chem Commun (Camb) 2011;47:9393–9395. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13495g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES