Abstract
The Chlorobiales are anoxygenic phototrophs that produce solid, extracellular elemental sulfur globules as an intermediate step in the oxidation of sulfide to sulfate. These organisms must export sulfur while preventing cell encrustation during S0 globule formation; during globule degradation they must find and mobilize the sulfur for intracellular oxidation to sulfate. To understand how the Chlorobiales address these challenges, we characterized the spatial relationships and physical dynamics of Chlorobaculum tepidum cells and S0 globules by light and electron microscopy. Cba. tepidum commonly formed globules at a distance from cells. Soluble polysulfides detected during globule production may allow for remote nucleation of globules. Polysulfides were also detected during globule degradation, probably produced as an intermediate of sulfur oxidation by attached cells. Polysulfides could feed unattached cells, which made up over 80% of the population and had comparable growth rates to attached cells. Given that S0 is formed remotely from cells, there is a question as to how cells are able to move toward S0 in order to attach. Time-lapse microscopy shows that Cba. tepidum is in fact capable of twitching motility, a finding supported by the presence of genes encoding type IV pili. Our results show how Cba. tepidum is able to avoid mineral encrustation and benefit from globule degradation even when not attached. In the environment, Cba. tepidum may also benefit from soluble sulfur species produced by other sulfur-oxidizing or sulfur-reducing bacteria as these organisms interact with its biogenic S0 globules.
Keywords: microbe–mineral interactions, green sulfur bacteria, elemental sulfur, motility, time-lapse, microscopy
Introduction
Solid elemental sulfur (S0) is an intermediate in the microbial oxidation of sulfide or thiosulfate to sulfate. Some sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) are able to both produce and degrade globular S0, often as a required intermediate step in the complete oxidation of sulfide to sulfate. The SOB are physiologically and phylogenetically diverse (Friedrich et al., 2001; Gregersen et al., 2011), and as a result, so are the ways and means of sulfur globule production and degradation. One of the most significant variations in SOB is where sulfur globules are deposited: intracellularly or extracellularly (Dahl & Prange, 2006). The green sulfur bacterium (GSB) Chlorobaculum tepidum, the model organism of the Chlorobiales, produces and degrades extracellular S0 globules (Chan et al., 2008c; Overmann & Garcia-Pichel, 2013). Because Cba. tepidum and other Chlorobiales deposit S0 globules extracellularly, several obstacles must be overcome in both production and degradation stages of globule metabolism. Despite the fundamental nature of these obstacles, little is understood about the spatial relationships and interactions between Cba. tepidum and S0 globules.
In the production of globules, sulfide is oxidized in the periplasm of these Gram-negative bacteria to S0 and must be exported outside of the cell through some mechanism (Gregersen et al., 2011; Hanson et al., 2015). This mechanism should also prevent the encrustation of cells by the mineral. For iron-oxidizing microbes, strategies evolved to avoid encrustation include the formation of extracellular structures (Chan et al., 2011), cell surface tuning (Saini & Chan, 2013) and changing cellular microenvironments (Hegler et al., 2010). These strategies work to direct mineral formation away from the cell surface, allowing cells to avoid complete entombment. In contrast to Fe-oxidizing microbes, strategies used by SOB to avoid encrustation are currently unknown.
Once sulfide has been depleted, Cba. tepidum will begin to oxidize S0. How S0 in extracellular globules is accessed by cells is not well understood. However, two general mechanisms have been proposed: direct contact and at-a-distance degradation (Chan et al., 2008a; Lloyd, 2003). Direct contact requires physical contact between the surface of the cell or cellular appendages (e.g. pili). This is analogous to the metal-reducing mechanisms of Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1, where outer membrane cytochromes are implicated in the direct-contact reduction of Mn(IV) and Fe(III) (Beliaev & Saffarini, 1998; Myers & Myers, 1992; Shi et al., 2009). At-a-distance mechanisms require the excretion of reducing substances or electron carriers that can act on solid substrates some distance from the cell. In the Fe-reducer Geobacter sulfurreducens, dissolved cytochromes can shuttle electrons to less accessible electron acceptors such as Fe(III) oxides (Lloyd et al., 1999). In other Fe-reducing bacteria, humic substances, flavins and anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate can also serve as electron shuttles (Fuller et al., 2014; Gralnick & Newman, 2007; Lovley et al., 1996; Marsili et al., 2008).
Studies of other SOB have suggested a direct contact mechanism for insoluble sulfur degradation. Allochromatium vinosum, a purple sulfur bacterium, requires attachment to use exogenously provided solid sulfur substrates (Franz et al., 2007). In addition, Mangold et al. (2011) suggest that unattached cells of Acidithiobacillus caldus, a chemotrophic sulfur oxidizer, are starved compared with cells attached to biologically produced S0 particles. Within the GSB, Chlorobaculum parvum has also been shown to require contact with elemental sulfur in order to utilize it (Donà, 2011).
Recently, we reported the ability of Cba. tepidum to grow on biogenic S0 globules as the sole photosynthetic electron donor and demonstrated that cellular attachment was required for growth on S0 (Hanson et al., 2015). Building on those methods and results, here we use time-lapse light microscopy and electron microscopy to characterize the spatial relationships and attachment dynamics of Cba. tepidum cells and S0 globules during both globule production and degradation. We show that attachment of cells and sulfur globules is dynamic and largely transient. These observations are in contrast to reports of mostly attached globules that were referred to as ‘functionally intracellular’ in some other Chlorobiales (Then & Trüper, 1984; Trüper & Genovese, 1968; van Gemerden, 1986). We propose a model of sulfur globule production and degradation in Cba. tepidum that includes a combination of both direct contact and remote mechanisms to explain our results. This model can account for the growth of attached and unattached cells, and the production and degradation of both attached and unattached sulfur globules.
Methods
Cba. tepidum cultures.
Cba. tepidum strain WT2321 was used in all cultures and grown in either Pf-7 medium (Chan et al., 2008c) or sulfur-free Pf-7 medium where thiosulfate and sulfide were initially omitted and individual tubes were amended with 2.5 mM sulfide prior to inoculation. All culture media were buffered to pH 6.9–7.0 with 10 mM Bis-Tris-propane. Standard growth conditions were 47 °C and 20 µmol photons m−2 s−1 from GE incandescent bulbs, as measured with a light meter equipped with a quantum PAR sensor (LI-COR). Primary cultures from cryo-stocks were grown under these conditions for 40–48 h, and then used to inoculate secondary cultures used in time-lapse imaging or electron microscopy.
Time-lapse light microscopy.
Live cultures of Cba. tepidum were loaded into borosilicate rectangular capillary tubes (VitroCom). Capillaries were then sealed at both ends with epoxy and mounted on a glass slide for viewing on a Zeiss AxioImager Z1 light microscope. The microscope stage was fitted with a heated glass plate (Tokai Hit) set to 47 °C. An objective lens heater (Tokai Hit) set to 37 °C was used on a ×40 EC Plan NeoFluar lens with a numerical aperture of 0.75 and resolution of 0.45 µm (Zeiss). A shield was placed around the microscope to minimize thermal drift. Light was provided at approximately 20 µmol photons m−2 s−1 from GE incandescent bulbs over the course of the time-lapse experiments. Light flux was measured as described above. All time-lapse imaging was done under phase contrast at ×400 total magnification with a Zeiss Axiocam Mrm camera, and AxioVision software was used to capture images every minute for hour-long experiments.
The effect of light on cell motion was tested by incubations without a light source except the brief illumination used only during imaging (76 ms per image). The effect of cell viability on motion was tested by fixing cells with 2.5 % glutaraldehyde prior to capillary loading, with illumination as described above.
Image analysis.
Time-lapse microscopy images were analysed in Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012) and Volocity software (PerkinElmer). Cells and sulfur were separated via image thresholding for counts and interaction analyses. Automated counts were compared against manual counts to confirm reliability of the thresholding method for analysis. Fiji was also used to construct time-lapse montages. Brightness and contrast of micrographs were adjusted for clarity. The 2D Particle Distribution plugin from the BioVoxxel suite was used to determine the spatial relationships between sulfur globules (Brocher, 2015). This plugin determines if particles distributed on a 2D plane are likely to be randomly distributed, self-avoiding or clustered. Nearest neighbour distances were calculated for each particle and compared against the theoretical nearest neighbour distance. The median nearest neighbour distance was statistically compared with the theoretical one using an F-test and then evaluated with a Welch’s t-test. The plugin uses statistical hypothesis tests to determine if the estimated interaction is significant. Cell movement was tracked in time-lapse movies using the Manual Tracking plugin in Fiji. Movie images were aligned and individual cells were tracked every 10 min throughout the course of the time-lapse.
Cryo-scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy.
Samples were prepared for cryo-scanning electron microscopy (cryoSEM) either on filters or on ACLAR (Honeywell/Allied Signal), a fluoropolymer film. Filtered samples were prepared by carefully pipetting culture onto 0.2 µm pore size polycarbonate filters (Millipore) and gently washed with deionized water. For ACLAR samples, strips of ACLAR were autoclaved and added to tubes, which were then filled with S-free Pf7 medium in an anaerobic chamber. Tubes were then stoppered and sealed, followed by headspace exchange and pressurization to 10 p.s.i. (~69 kPa) with 5 % CO2 + 95 % N2 gas passed through heated copper. At least 24 h prior to inoculation, ACLAR tubes were amended with 2.5 mM sulfide. ACLAR tubes were then inoculated, with care taken to inject inoculum over the ACLAR strip. Tubes were incubated as described above, but secured horizontally in the water bath. Following incubation, the ACLAR strip was removed and cut to size for imaging. Samples were mounted onto specimen holders with Tissue Freezing Medium (Electron Microscopy Sciences).
Samples were plunged into liquid nitrogen slush and transfered under vacuum to the Gatan Alto 2500 cryo chamber at a temperature of −120 °C. Samples were then sublimated for 10 min at −90 °C followed by cooling to −120 °C. A thin layer of gold–palladium was sputtered onto the samples. The samples were then transferred into a Hitachi S-4700 field-emission scanning electron microscope for imaging.
For transmission electron microscopy imaging, formvar/carbon-coated 400 mesh copper grids were glow discharged with a Pelco easiGlow system to render the surface hydrophilic. The grid was then floated on a drop of sample for several seconds, washed on four drops of filtered deionized water and then negatively stained with 2 % aqueous uranyl acetate. Samples were imaged on a Zeiss Libra 120 transmission electron microscope equipped with a Gatan Ultrascan 1000 CCD camera.
Reduced sulfur compound analysis by HPLC.
Cultures were grown in sulfur-free Pf-7 medium with either 2.1 mM sulfide or 9.1 mM biogenic S0 [purified as described by Hanson et al. (2015)] as the sole electron donor. Samples for analysis were taken during the exponential growth phase before the electron donor was exhausted. Cells and globules were removed by centrifugation (16 400 g, 2 min) and a sample of the supernatant was immediately used for bimane derivatization following previously described methods (Chan et al., 2008c). This method can quantify thiosulfate, sulfite and sulfide at concentrations >1 µM. Polysulfides are detected by this method, but cannot be accurately quantified (Rethmeier et al., 1997). The polysulfide standard was prepared by adding an anoxic sulfide solution to solid S8 (2 : 1 molar ratio of S8/sulfide) in a sealed tube under an atmosphere of 5 % CO2 + 95 % N2.
Results
Motility in Cba. tepidum results in dynamic interactions with S0 globules
We used time-lapse light microscopy of live Cba. tepidum cultures to determine how the spatial relationships of Cba. tepidum cells and S0 globules changed over time. The attachment of cells to S0 globules was dynamic, with attached cells frequently detaching and reattaching, sometimes to multiple globules. As a result, some globules within the population were observed to be free from cells for over six consecutive hours during both production and degradation stages. Multiple cells would also attach to a single globule, with some remaining attached over time, and others attaching to the globule for only several minutes. Considering the consistent observations of attachment and detachment of cells to S0 globules and movement between different globules, we questioned how a microbe that is considered non-motile could cover distances of tens of micrometres. Cells tracked in live, illuminated cultures moved an average total distance of 26 µm and an average net distance of 7 µm (Fig. 1a, Video S1, available in the online Supplementary Material) over 6.5 h. To rule out Brownian motion as the primary cause of cellular motion, we performed equivalent time-lapse experiments on live cells in the dark, as well as glutaraldehyde-killed cells in light, at 47 °C; in both cases, cells showed no net movement (Fig. 1b, c; Videos S2 and S3). These results clearly demonstrate that Cba. tepidum is motile.
Fig. 1.
Cell movement paths for (a) an illuminated, live culture (Video S1); (b) a live culture in the dark (Video S2); and (c) an illuminated, glutaraldehyde-killed culture (Video S3). Cell paths were tracked for the duration of the time-lapse (6 h 40 min, 10 h and 10 h, respectively), and overlaid on the final frame of the time-lapse (line represents the path, dot represents final position). Nearly all cells in the illuminated, live culture moved; the few cells that did not appear to move were attached to globules, which remained in fixed positions. Cell paths in killed and dark cultures never exceeded the diameter of the final position marker (d=1.6 µm). All cultures were heated at 47 °C during imaging.
To find a genetic basis for the observed cellular movement, the Cba. tepidum genome was examined for the presence of genes that might confer motility. A cluster of 18 genes (CT0425–CT0442) encoding homologues of type IV pilin subunits, pilus assembly proteins and hypothetical proteins is present in the Cba. tepidum genome. Type IV pili are responsible for twitching motility and tight surface adherence (Burrows, 2012; Kachlany et al., 2001). We observed the presence of structures with similar dimensions to type IV pili in Cba. tepidum cells using TEM imaging (Fig. 2). Twitching motility is driven by ATPases that polymerize and depolymerize pilin subunits. Polymerization extends the pilus from the cell, allowing it to attach to a surface, while depolymerization pulls the cell along the attached pilus (Maier & Wong, 2015). This cluster contains two candidate ATPases involved in protein secretion (CT0433 and CT0434) along with orthologues of subunits required for type IV pilus assembly (CT0435 and CT0436). The annotation for gene CT0437 notes that it contains an authentic frameshift mutation. We sequenced CT0437 in our laboratory strain of Cba. tepidum; the sequence matched the published genome perfectly (data not shown). The amino acid sequence derived from CT0437 is homologous to the type IV leader peptidase superfamily (peptidase A24, pfam01478), which is involved in the maturation of pilin subunits in diverse organisms (Berry & Pelicic, 2015). Because the frameshift mutation leaves the peptidase gene product largely intact, we expect the gene cluster to be sufficient for the motility we observe in Cba. tepidum.
Fig. 2.
(a) TEM micrograph of a Cba. tepidum cell with pili (black arrowheads). (b) Annotated genomic region of Cba. tepidum that encodes four type IV pilin subunits and assembly machinery. Shading indicates gene product function as noted in the key. Genes with annotated frame shifts are noted with asterisks and those that display significant primary amino acid sequence similarity are indicated by joined arrows.
S0 globule nucleation and growth can occur at a distance from cells
We tracked the formation of globules in the production stage using time-lapse phase contrast light microscopy (Fig. 3). S0 globules first became visible within the first 30 min of illuminated incubation, upon reaching approximately 0.5 µm in diameter, just over the 0.45 µm resolution of the lens used for imaging, and appeared phase-dark at this size. No new globules became visible after this point and the existing globules increased in apparent diameter. S0 globules transitioned to phase-bright once they exceeded 1 µm in diameter.
Fig. 3.
Time-lapse montage of S0 globules (white arrowheads) growing without contact from cells (black arrowheads). A fourth S0 globule is in view, but receives transient cell contact (white arrows). While the montage is shown at 25 min intervals, images were taken at 1 min intervals and no contact was observed for the duration of the montage. The full movie is available as Video S1.
Globules became visible and grew in size at a distance from cells, in some cases without any contact by cells throughout the entire production stage (Fig. 3, Video S1). Over 50 % of globules received only transient cell contact throughout the lifetime of the globule. The largest distance observed between a newly formed globule and a cell was approximately 8 µm, with typical distances closer to 4 µm (Fig. S1). In rare cases, globules became visible and grew with cells attached for much of the production stage. Growth rates were similar for globules always in cell contact versus those never in cell contact (Fig. S2) and globule growth rates did not depend on the number of cells in close proximity (Fig. S3). However, because total globule growth was similar to the imaging resolution (0.45 µm), no statistical evaluation could be made.
Cells outnumbered S0 globules for the duration of the time-lapse experiment. The ratio of cells to globules in the production stage was 1.5–2.5, increasing in that range over time as cells divided, but no new globules formed. The spatial distribution of globules in the time-lapse field of view was non-random and clustered (P<0.001) based on the median nearest neighbour distance compared with a theoretical random distribution. In addition, the distribution of globules and cells in relation to one another was non-random (P<0.001) and suggests that globules form near cells. Using HPLC analysis of bimane-derivatized supernatants of S0-producing cultures (Rethmeier et al., 1997), we observed two soluble thiol-containing compounds that exhibited retention times identical to those of polysulfides in a standard (Fig. 4a); these appeared to transiently accumulate during S0 production (Fig. S4A). Taken together, these observations suggest that cells contribute to a pool of dissolved forms of sulfur from which a set of globules nucleate in the very early stages of sulfide oxidation and continue to grow by accretion.
Fig. 4.
Representative HPLC traces of culture supernatants from S0-producing Cba. tepidum culture grown on sulfide as the sole electron donor (a) and S0-degrading (b) cultures grown on biogenic S0 as the sole electron donor. Traces for a polysulfide standard and a sulfur-free PF-7 medium blank are overlaid for comparison. The presence of polysulfide-1 and polysulfide-2 peaks are evident for the S0-producing culture, while the presence of only one peak with a retention time similar to polysulfide-1 is observed for the S0-degrading culture.
Attachment of some cells to S0 globules is required for globule degradation
During S0 globule degradation, fewer than 20 % of cells were attached to S0 globules at any one time, which agreed with previous measurements of Cba. tepidum cultures (Hanson et al., 2015). In theory, there could be globules smaller than the 0.45 µm resolution limit; however, we have never observed small S0 globules in cryoSEM images of S0-degrading cultures. Cells grew and divided during S0 globule degradation whether they were attached to S0 globules or not (Fig. 5, Video S4). S0 globules were degraded while in contact with cells. Unexpectedly, we also observed S0 globules that were degraded without any contact from cells over the duration of the degradation stage (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
(a) Time-lapse montage of S0 globule degradation. White arrowheads show the degradation of a globule without cell contact; black arrowheads show the degradation of a globule always in contact with a cell. White arrows show an unattached cell growing, and then dividing at 470 min. These observations are observed throughout the 1 min interval time-lapse experiment. The full movie is available in Video S4. (b) Average rate of cell elongation in micrometres per hour for cells unattached and attached to S0 globules. Cells were measured starting at 240 min of growth. Measurements were taken every 5 min until the experiment concluded at 565 min of growth; n=6 per condition. (c) Relationship between the number of S0 globules within a 10 µm radius of a cell and the rate of that cell’s elongation. Data points include both attached and unattached cells.
We compared the rates of elongation for cells both attached and unattached to sulfur globules and found that there was no difference between the two populations. However, there was a weak, but statistically significant, positive relationship between cell elongation rate and globule proximity (R2=0.338, P=0.047) (Fig. 5). Doubling times were calculated from the cells that could be tracked from division as a daughter cell to a second division as a parent cell. Doubling times ranged from 2.5 to 3.2 h for both attached and unattached cells, comparable with the 2.1–2.3 h doubling times observed in batch cultures of Cba. tepidum (Chan et al., 2008b; Morgan-Kiss et al., 2009; Wahlund et al., 1991).
To understand how unattached cells were able to grow, we looked for soluble sulfur intermediates in Cba. tepidum cultures that could feed unattached cells during the S0 globule degradation stage (Truper & Fischer, 1982; Van Gemerden, 1984). Within the culture supernatants, we detected an HPLC peak corresponding to polysulfide (Fig. 4b). This peak increased during S0 degradation relative to controls (cells in sulfur-free medium and uninoculated medium with S0), from 0 to 30 h (Fig. S4B, C).
S0 globule morphology over time
S0 globules appeared smooth and round during the globule production stage, as observed by cryoSEM. Some S0 globules in contact with cells deformed slightly, suggesting possible attraction between the cell and globule, while S0 globules not in contact with cells remained roughly spherical (Fig. 6a, b). This may reflect the pliability and ‘liquid’-like properties of early-stage S0 globules. The attachment point between cells and globules frequently occurred on the poles of the cell.
Fig. 6.
CryoSEM micrographs showing S0 globule texture and morphology through the production and degradation stages. (a, b) Production-stage S0 globules and wild-type Cba. tepidum cells attached. (c) Partially degraded biogenic S0 globule with attached wild-type Cba. tepidum cells (panel C from Hanson et al., 2015; reproduced here for comparison with production-stage globules).
S0 globule morphology was observed in cultures of wild-type Cba. tepidum grown on purified biogenic S0 as the sole electron donor [described by Hanson et al. (2015)]. Partially degraded S0 globules in these cultures were markedly different from globules observed during formation. Degradation presented as a corrosion-like morphology, with shallow and deep pits in the globule surface (Fig. 6c). This morphology highlights the fact that the apparent diameter of globules in phase contrast microscopy may not represent the true volume and morphology of S0 globules, particularly in the degradation stage. When cells were observed in association with degraded globules, the size of the pits was smaller than the attached surface of the cell. This suggests that such degradation is not a result of burrowing cells. The pits are often regularly distributed across the globule surface and do not appear concentrated at the location of attached cells. This suggests previous, transient contact by cells, and/or degradation of S0 globules by a dissolved phase.
Discussion
By characterizing the spatial relationships and physical dynamics of Cba. tepidum–S0 globule interactions, we have been able to constrain the mechanisms of globule production and degradation. We found that Cba. tepidum deposits and dissolves S0 globules effectively both with contact and at a distance. The discovery of twitching motility partially explains how Cba. tepidum accesses extracellularly deposited S0 globules. The observations of S0 globule growth and degradation at a distance from cells can be explained by the polysulfides we observed in culture supernatants. Polysulfides have long been suggested to play a role in the production and degradation of S0 globules (Brune, 1995; Franz et al., 2009; Truper & Fischer, 1982; van Gemerden, 1984; Visscher & van Gemerden, 1988). To our knowledge, this paper provides the first evidence for the presence of polysulfides in Cba. tepidum S0-producing and S0-degrading cultures. Our observations support the hypothesis that polysulfides are key intermediates of both S0 globule formation and degradation, which enables Cba. tepidum to overcome the challenges of mineral production and degradation.
An updated model of S0 globule production and degradation in Cba. tepidum
Based on our findings, we have developed an updated model of S0 globule production and degradation by Cba. tepidum (Fig. 7). In this model, Cba. tepidum cells oxidize sulfide to polysulfides, which diffuse into the surrounding medium. Chains of sulfur, for example polysulfides and organic polysulfanes, can cyclize (Brune, 1995; Eckert et al., 2003; Garcia & Druschel, 2014; Kleinjan et al., 2003; Steudel, 2003), consistent with the existence of S8 rings in biogenic S0 globules (George et al., 2008; Pickering et al., 2001; Prange et al., 2002). The pattern of rapid S0 globule nucleation, followed by growth but no new visible globule production, can be explained by aggregation and Ostwald particle ripening. S8 rings can quickly aggregate into very small condensed forms of sulfur (Steudel et al., 1988; Steudel, 1996, 2003), with a critical nucleus size as low as 30 nm (Chaudhuri & Paria, 2010). Attraction between these clusters causes further aggregation (Garcia & Druschel, 2014). In Ostwald ripening, growth of larger particles occurs at the expense of smaller particles, due to differences in surface energetics (Gilbert et al., 2003). These processes have been shown in theoretical and experimental work to govern abiotic elemental sulfur particle growth (Garcia & Druschel, 2014).
Fig. 7.
Model of S0 globule production and degradation in Cba. tepidum. During globule production, cells oxidize sulfide (HS−) to a pool of intermediate, soluble polysulfide. This pool can then accrete into globules. When sulfide is exhausted, globule degradation begins. Attached cells oxidize S0 globules and produce polysulfide intermediates. These intermediates can then (a) degrade globules at a distance from cells, and (b) feed unattached cells.
When sulfide is exhausted, cells switch to S0 globule oxidation. While cells that are attached to globules can degrade them through direct contact, we have also observed that unattached cells grow and that many S0 globules shrink in the absence of any cell contact. These observations require that soluble compounds participate in S0 degradation by Cba. tepidum. We suggest that attached cells initiate globule degradation, producing polysulfides. Polysulfides in the medium can then carry out several functions: (1) diffuse into other cells and reach inner membrane Dsr proteins that are required for S0 utilization by Cba. tepidum (Holkenbrink et al., 2011), and (2) reductively open S8 rings in S0 globules, releasing more polysulfides. These functions are consistent with our observations that unattached cells grow and S0 globules degrade in the absence of any cell contact.
Dissolved intermediates as agents of globule production and dissolution at a distance
Our observations indicate that nearly all Cba. tepidum cells were growing and dividing during S0 globule formation and must be producing a sulfur byproduct. Our detection of polysulfides suggests that they serve as a soluble intermediate and direct mineral nucleation and S0 globule growth away from Cba. tepidum cells. This idea is supported by the production of fewer S0 globules than cells, suggesting that multiple cells contribute to the formation of a single globule. By directing mineral nucleation away from the cell surface, Cba. tepidum is able to avoid encrustation. This is in contrast to Fe oxidation and biomineralization at neutral pH, in which Fe oxides are at least initially in direct contact with cells, such as stalks (Chan et al., 2011). This is probably because Fe(III) is typically insoluble at neutral pH, and no soluble intermediate exists to facilitate remote nucleation. In sulfur oxidation, the existence of soluble intermediates allows for remote mineral formation and growth.
Because globules are often formed at a distance from cells, it is important to consider how exactly the cells are able to find and/or utilize their sulfur when sulfide is exhausted and the S0 globule degradation stage begins. Previous work has shown that Cba. tepidum will not grow on biogenic S0 as a sole electron donor if cells and S0 are separated by a dialysis membrane, suggesting that direct contact with S0 globules is required for growth (Hanson et al., 2015). With this requirement, there are significant challenges in finding and accessing sulfur in the degradation stage.
Our results show that these challenges can be addressed by a subpopulation oxidizing sulfur at a distance from globules. It is important to note that globule degradation and sulfur oxidation may have some overlap, but are not inherently the same process. We hypothesize that attached Cba. tepidum cells can dissolve S0 through direct contact with globules and that these attached cells produce soluble intermediates, with polysulfides the most likely candidate based on our HPLC data. If flavins or other cellular metabolites could mediate interactions between Cba. tepidum and S0 at a distance, then dialysis culture should have been successful, as in the case of other organisms (Fuller et al., 2014; Gralnick & Newman, 2007; Lovley et al., 1996; Marsili et al., 2008). Because Cba. tepidum cannot grow when separated from S0, a model such as the one shown in Fig 7., involving both direct contact and remote S0 utilization, is required.
Implications for GSB in the environment
Why would a microbe store S0 globules extracellularly? Transient attachment suggests that cells and globules are not well attached to each other, and so this could result in other microbes pirating Cba. tepidum sulfur. However, if, as we suggest, attached cells produce soluble intermediates during S0 globule degradation, presumably other SOB could do the same and feed unattached Cba. tepidum cells. The S0 globules may also be reduced by sulfur-reducing microbes to sulfide, which is the preferred electron donor for Cba. tepidum, thereby creating a closed syntrophic sulfur cycle. This interaction has been observed between Chlorobium vibrioforme strain 1930 and Desulfuromonas acetoxidans (Warthmann et al., 1992). In either case, extracellular storage would not represent a loss, and could in fact be an advantage, as Cba. tepidum cells would still reap benefits from the sulfur globules they produced.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funds from the University of Delaware Research Foundation and NSF grant MCB-1244373 to T. E. H. and C. S. C., as well as NSF grant GRFP-0750966 to A. T. L. It also utilized infrastructure resources provided by grants from the National Science Foundation EPSCoR programme (EPS-0814251) and National Institutes of Health INBRE programme (2 P20 RR016472-09) from the National Center for Research Resources. We thank Shannon Modla for help with TEM sample preparation and imaging, Mike Moore and Jeff Caplan for helpful discussions during development of the methods of the time-lapse microscopy setup, and Jeff Caplan for assistance with time-lapse image analysis. We also thank Kara Hoppes, Erin Field, Shingo Kato and Sean McAllister for helpful discussion and comments on the manuscript.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary File 1
Supplementary Data
Supplementary File 2
Supplementary Data
Supplementary File 3
Supplementary Data
Supplementary File 4
Supplementary Data
Supplementary File 5
Abbreviations:
- cryoSEM
cryo-scanning electron microscopy
- GSB
green sulfur bacteria
- SOB
sulfur-oxidizing bacterium
References
- Beliaev A. S., Saffarini D. A.(1998). Shewanella putrefaciens mtrB encodes an outer membrane protein required for Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. J Bacteriol 1806292–6297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berry J. L., Pelicic V.(2015). Exceptionally widespread nanomachines composed of type IV pilins: the prokaryotic Swiss Army knives. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39fuu001. 10.1093/femsre/fuu001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brocher J.(2015). The BioVoxxel image processing and analysis toolbox. In European BioImage Analysis Symposium Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
- Brune D. C.(1995). Isolation and characterization of sulfur globule proteins from Chromatium vinosum and Thiocapsa roseopersicina. Arch Microbiol 163391–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bryant D. A., Frigaard N. U.(2006). Prokaryotic photosynthesis and phototrophy illuminated. Trends Microbiol 14488–496. 10.1016/j.tim.2006.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burrows L. L.(2012). Pseudomonas aeruginosa twitching motility: type IV pili in action. Annu Rev Microbiol 66493–520. 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chan L.-K., Morgan-Kiss R., Hanson T. E.(2008a). Genetic and proteomic studies of sulfur oxidation in Chlorobium tepidum (syn. Chlorobaculum tepidum). Sulfur Metabolism in Phototrophic Organisms, 357–373. Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Chan L.-K., Morgan-Kiss R., Hanson T. E.(2008b). Sulfur oxidation in Chlorobium tepidum (syn. Chlorobaculum tepidum): genetic and proteomic analyses. Microbial Sulfur Metabolism, 117–126. Edited by Dahl C., Friedrich C. G.Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Chan L.-K., Weber T. S., Morgan-Kiss R. M., Hanson T. E.(2008c). A genomic region required for phototrophic thiosulfate oxidation in the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium tepidum (syn. Chlorobaculum tepidum). Microbiology 154818–829. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/012583-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chan C. S., Fakra S. C., Emerson D., Fleming E. J., Edwards K. J.(2011). Lithotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria produce organic stalks to control mineral growth: implications for biosignature formation. ISME J 5717–727. 10.1038/ismej.2010.173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhuri R. G., Paria S.(2010). Synthesis of sulfur nanoparticles in aqueous surfactant solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 343439–446. 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dahl C., Prange A.(2006). Bacterial sulfur globules: occurrence, structure and metabolism. Inclusions in Prokaryotes 21–51. Edited by Shively J. M.Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Donà C.(2011). Mobilization of sulfur by green sulfur bacteria: physiological and molecular studies on Chlorobaculum parvum DSM 263. Chemie der Universität Bremen, Bremen. [Google Scholar]
- Eckert B., Okazaki R., Steudel R., Takeda N., Tokitoh N., Wong M.(2003). Elemental sulfur and sulfur-rich compounds II. Top Curr Chem 23132–98. [Google Scholar]
- Franz B., Lichtenberg H., Hormes J., Modrow H., Dahl C., Prange A.(2007). Utilization of solid ‘elemental’ sulfur by the phototrophic purple sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum: a sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. Microbiology 1531268–1274. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/003954-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franz B., Gehrke T., Lichtenberg H., Hormes J., Dahl C., Prange A.(2009). Unexpected extracellular and intracellular sulfur species during growth of Allochromatium vinosum with reduced sulfur compounds. Microbiology 1552766–2774. 10.1099/mic.0.027904-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedrich C. G., Rother D., Bardischewsky F., Quentmeier A., Fischer J.(2001). Oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds by bacteria: emergence of a common mechanism? Appl Environ Microbiol 672873–2882. 10.1128/AEM.67.7.2873-2882.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frigaard N.-U., Dahl C.(2008). Sulfur metabolism in phototrophic sulfur bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol 54103–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuller S. J., McMillan D. G., Renz M. B., Schmidt M., Burke I. T., Stewart D. I.(2014). Extracellular electron transport-mediated Fe(III) reduction by a community of alkaliphilic bacteria that use flavins as electron shuttles. Appl Environ Microbiol 80128–137. 10.1128/AEM.02282-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia A. A., Druschel G. K.(2014). Elemental sulfur coarsening kinetics. Geochem Trans 15. 10.1186/s12932-014-0011-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- George G. N., Gnida M., Bazylinski D. A., Prince R. C., Pickering I. J.(2008). X-ray absorption spectroscopy as a probe of microbial sulfur biochemistry: the nature of bacterial sulfur globules revisited. J Bacteriol 1906376–6383. 10.1128/JB.00539-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilbert B., Zhang H., Huang F., Finnegan M. P., Waychunas G. A., Banfield J. F.(2003). Special phase transformation and crystal growth pathways observed in nanoparticles. Geochem Trans 420–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gralnick J. A., Newman D. K.(2007). Extracellular respiration. Mol Microbiol 651–11. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05778.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gregersen L. H., Bryant D. A., Frigaard N. U.(2011). Mechanisms and evolution of oxidative sulfur metabolism in green sulfur bacteria. Front Microbiol 2. 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson T. E., Bonsu E., Tuerk A., Marnocha C. L., Powell D. H., Chan C. S.(2015). Chlorobaculum tepidum growth on biogenic S0 as the sole photosynthetic electron donor. Environ Microbiol. 10.1111/1462-2920.12995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hegler F., Schmidt C., Schwarz H., Kappler A.(2010). Does a low-pH microenvironment around phototrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria prevent cell encrustation by Fe(III) minerals? FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74592–600. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00975.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holkenbrink C., Barbas S. O., Mellerup A., Otaki H., Frigaard N. U.(2011). Sulfur globule oxidation in green sulfur bacteria is dependent on the dissimilatory sulfite reductase system. Microbiology 1571229–1239. 10.1099/mic.0.044669-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kachlany S. C., Planet P. J., Desalle R., Fine D. H., Figurski D. H., Kaplan J. B.(2001). flp-1, the first representative of a new pilin gene subfamily, is required for non-specific adherence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Mol Microbiol 40542–554. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02422.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleinjan W. E., de Keizer A., Janssen A. J.(2003). Biologically produced sulfur. Elemental Sulfur and Sulfur-Rich Compounds I 167–188. Edited by Steudel R.Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. [Google Scholar]
- Lloyd J. R.(2003). Microbial reduction of metals and radionuclides. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27411–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lloyd J. R., Blunt-Harris E. L., Lovley D. R.(1999). The periplasmic 9.6-kilodalton c-type cytochrome of Geobacter sulfurreducens is not an electron shuttle to Fe(III). J Bacteriol 1817647–7649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lovley D. R., Coates J. D., Blunt-Harris E. L., Phillips E. J. P., Woodward J. C.(1996). Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration. Nature 382445–448. 10.1038/382445a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Maier B., Wong G. C.(2015). How bacteria use type IV pili machinery on surfaces. Trends Microbiol 23775–788. 10.1016/j.tim.2015.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mangold S., Valdés J., Holmes D. S., Dopson M.(2011). Sulfur metabolism in the extreme acidophile Acidithiobacillus caldus. Front Microbiol 2. 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsili E., Baron D. B., Shikhare I. D., Coursolle D., Gralnick J. A., Bond D. R.(2008). Shewanella secretes flavins that mediate extracellular electron transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1053968–3973. 10.1073/pnas.0710525105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan-Kiss R. M., Chan L. K., Modla S., Weber T. S., Warner M., Czymmek K. J., Hanson T. E.(2009). Chlorobaculum tepidum regulates chlorosome structure and function in response to temperature and electron donor availability. Photosynth Res 9911–21. 10.1007/s11120-008-9361-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myers C. R., Myers J. M.(1992). Localization of cytochromes to the outer membrane of anaerobically grown Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1. J Bacteriol 1743429–3438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Overmann J., Garcia-Pichel F.(2013). The phototrophic way of life. The Prokaryotes, 203–257. Edited by Rosenberg E., DeLong E. F., Lory S., Stackebrandt E., Thompson F.Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Pibernat I. V., Abella C. A.(1996). Sulfide pulsing as the controlling factor of spinae production in Chlorobium limicola strain UdG 6038. Arch Microbiol 165272–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pickering I. J., George G. N., Yu E. Y., Brune D. C., Tuschak C., Overmann J., Beatty J. T., Prince R. C.(2001). Analysis of sulfur biochemistry of sulfur bacteria using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Biochemistry 408138–8145. 10.1021/bi0105532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prange A., Chauvistré R., Modrow H., Hormes J., Trüper H. G., Dahl C.(2002). Quantitative speciation of sulfur in bacterial sulfur globules: X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveals at least three different species of sulfur. Microbiology 148267–276. 10.1099/00221287-148-1-267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rethmeier J., Rabenstein A., Langer M., Fischer U.(1997). Detection of traces of oxidized and reduced sulfur compounds in small samples by combination of different high-performance liquid chromatography methods. J Chromatogr A 760295–302. 10.1016/S0021-9673(96)00809-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saini G., Chan C. S.(2013). Near-neutral surface charge and hydrophilicity prevent mineral encrustation of Fe-oxidizing micro-organisms. Geobiology 11191–200. 10.1111/gbi.12021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi L., Richardson D. J., Wang Z., Kerisit S. N., Rosso K. M., Zachara J. M., Fredrickson J. K.(2009). The roles of outer membrane cytochromes of Shewanella and Geobacter in extracellular electron transfer. Environ Microbiol Rep 1220–227. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00035.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steudel R.(1996). Mechanism for the formation of elemental sulfur from aqueous sulfide in chemical and microbiological desulfurization processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 351417–1423. 10.1021/ie950558t [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Steudel R.(2003). Aqueous sulfur sols. Elemental Sulfur and Sulfur-Rich Compounds I, 153–166. Edited by Steudel R.Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. [Google Scholar]
- Steudel R., Göbel T., Holdt G.(1988). The molecular composition of hydrophilic sulfur sols prepared by acid decomposition of thiosulfate. Z Naturforsch C 43203–218. 10.1515/znb-1988-0212 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Then J., Trüper H. G.(1984). Utilization of sulfide and elemental sulfur by Ectothiorhodospira halochloris. Arch Microbiol 139295–298. 10.1007/BF00408369 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Truper H. G., Fischer U.(1982). Anaerobic oxidation of sulphur compounds as electron donors for bacterial photosynthesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 298529–542. 10.1098/rstb.1982.0095 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Trüper H. G., Genovese S.(1968). Characterization of photosynthetic sulfur bacteria causing red water in Lake Faro (Messina, Sicily). Limnol Oceanogr 13225–232. 10.4319/lo.1968.13.2.0225 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Van Gemerden H.(1984). The sulfide affinity of phototrophic bacteria in relation to the location of elemental sulfur. Arch Microbiol 139289–294. 10.1007/BF00408368 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- van Gemerden H.(1986). Production of elemental sulfur by green and purple sulfur bacteria. Arch Microbiol 14652–56. 10.1007/BF00690158 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Visscher P. T., van Gemerden H.(1988). Growth of Chlorobium limicola f. thiosulfatophilum on polysulfides. Green Photosynthetic Bacteria, 287–294. Edited by Olson J. M., Ormerod J. G., Amesz J., Stackebrandt E., Trüper H. G.Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Wahlund T. M., Woese C. R., Castenholz R. W., Madigan M. T.(1991). A thermophilic green sulfur bacterium from New Zealand hot springs, Chlorobium tepidum sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 15681–90. 10.1007/BF00290978 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Warthmann R., Cypionka H., Pfennig N.(1992). Photoproduction of H2 from acetate by syntrophic cocultures of green sulfur bacteria and sulfur-reducing bacteria. Arch Microbiol 157343–348. 10.1007/BF00248679 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary File 1
Supplementary File 2
Supplementary File 3
Supplementary File 4
Supplementary File 5