Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2017 Nov 14;15(1):813–820. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7399

MicroRNA-9 enhances sensitivity to cetuximab in epithelial phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma cells through regulation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2

Fei Xue 1,✉, Yuntian Liang 1, Zhenrong Li 1, Yanhui Liu 2, Hongwei Zhang 1, Yu Wen 1, Lei Yan 1, Qiang Tang 1, Erhui Xiao 1, Dongyi Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC5772877  PMID: 29399149

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most widespread malignant human tumors worldwide. Treatment options include radiotherapy, surgical intervention and chemotherapy; however, drug resistance is an ongoing treatment concern. In the present study, the effects of a microRNA (miR/miRNA), miR-9, on the sensitivity of HCC cell lines to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, cetuximab, were examined. miR-9 has been proposed to serve a role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. In the present study, bioinformatics analyses identified the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2 (eIF-5A-2) as a target of miR-9. The expression levels of miR-9 and eIF-5A-2 were examined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and HCC cell lines were transfected with miR-9 mimics and inhibitors to determine the effects of the miRNA on cell proliferation and viability. The miR-9 mimic was revealed to significantly increase the sensitivity of epithelial phenotype HCC cells (Hep3B and Huh7) to cetuximab, while the miR-9 inhibitor triggered the opposite effect. There were no significant differences in sensitivity to cetuximab observed in mesenchymal phenotype HCC cells (SNU387 and SNU449). Cells lines displaying high expression levels of eIF-5A-2 were more resistant to cetuximab. Transfection of cells with a miR-9 mimic resulted in downregulation of the expression of eIF-5A-2 mRNA, while an miR-9 inhibitor increased expression. When expression of eIF-5A-2 was knocked down with siRNA, the effects of miR-9 on cetuximab sensitivity were no longer observed. Taken together, these data support a role for miR-9 in enhancing the sensitivity of epithelial phenotype HCC cells to cetuximab through regulation of eIF-5A-2.

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, microRNA-9, cetuximab, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2, drug resistance

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common primary malignancies of the liver, the third leading cause of cancer-associated mortalities after stomach and lung cancer, and the sixth most common neoplasm worldwide (1,2). Current treatments for HCC include chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical intervention. However, drug resistance is a growing concern as a result of the increased application of chemotherapeutics (3). Determining the molecular mechanisms underlying drug resistance in HCC cells is therefore imperative.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are small, non-coding RNAs that modulate post-transcriptional gene expression by binding to the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of target mRNAs, in addition to being involved in the regulation of essential cellular processes, including proliferation, diversification, metastasis and apoptosis, particularly in cancer development and progression (4–6). Aberrant miRNA expression has demonstrated potential as a prognostic or diagnostic marker in various types of cancer, including breast, non-small cell lung and colon cancer (7–10). The expression levels of miRNAs reflect the developmental lineage and differentiation state of tumors (11). Studies have demonstrated that miR-185 suppresses cell growth and epithelial-mesenchymal transition progression by targeting Six2, providing a novel target for the molecular treatment of liver malignancies (12). It has been demonstrated that a loss of miR-211 expression, and consequently uncontrolled secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine overexpression, may drive progression of HCC (13).

Previous studies have indicated that the levels of miR-9 are downregulated in certain types of cancer, such as ovarian cancer, gastric cancer and neuroblastoma (14–17); however, it has also been revealed that the expression of miR-9 is upregulated in colorectal, breast, lung and laryngeal squamous cell cancer types (18–22). Other studies have indicated that miR-9 may serve a major role in tumor progression and tumorigenesis (23). The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 (eIF-5A-2), located at 3q26, is one of the most frequently observed chromosomal alterations in ovarian carcinoma (24). Overexpression of eIF-5A-2 has also been observed in other solid tumors and has been defined as an adverse prognostic marker in HCC (25), ovarian carcinoma (26), bladder carcinoma (27) and non-small cell lung cancer (28), and as a metastasis-promoting factor in HCC (29) and colorectal carcinoma (30). In the present study, an miRNA target prediction website, TargetScan (www.targetscan.org), was used to identify potential targets of miR-9. The 3′UTR of eIF-5A-2 was identified as a potential target, and examination of the sequence of the 3′UTR of eIF-5A-2 identified multiple potential sites for interaction with miR-9. The mechanisms underlying the role of miR-9 in the regulation of HCC cells have not been characterized. We hypothesized that miR-9 may affect the expression of eIF-5A-2 and, furthermore, may regulate the sensitivity of epithelial HCC cells to cetuximab.

The present study investigated the effects of miR-9/eIF-5A-2-regulated cetuximab sensitivity in HCC cell lines and monitored the expression of miR-9 and eIF-5A-2 mRNA. We aimed to investigate whether or not miR-9, through regulating the expression of eIF-5A-2, may affect the sensitivity of HCC cells with an epithelial phenotype to cetuximab.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Human HCC cell lines (Hep3B, Huh7, SNU387 and SNU449) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). Huh7 cells (epithelial phenotype HCC) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). SNU387 and SNU449 cells (mesenchymal phenotype HCC) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Hep3B cells (epithelial phenotype HCC) were cultured in minimum essential medium (MEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. All cells were maintained under 5% CO2 at 37°C in a humidified incubator. Cetuximab and the miR-9 mimic and inhibitor were all purchased from Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). The eIF-5A-2 siRNA and negative control siRNA were designed by and purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA). Furthermore, TargetScan (www.targetscan.org) was to predict the associated miRNAs for eIF-5A-2. Briefly, we opened TargetScan was opened and the human species chosen. The gene symbol eIF-5A-2 was searched to obtain the predicted associated miRNAs.

siRNA transfections

HCC cell lines were transfected with eIF-5A-2 siRNA (100 nM; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.; forward, 5′-TATGCAGTGCTCGGCCTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTGGAACATCCATGTTGTGAGTAGA-3′) or a negative control siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The transfection medium (Opti-MEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was replaced with complete medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) 6 h after transfection, and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. All treatments were initiated 24 h after transfection.

Cell viability assay

HCC cell lines or siRNA-transfected HCC cell lines were seeded onto 96-well plates at a density of 5×103 cells/well. The medium was replaced with the corresponding serum-free medium for 24 h to synchronize the cells, prior to the culture medium being replaced with complete medium containing the drug at the indicated concentrations (Cetuximab: Hep3B, 2,229 µg/ml; Huh7, 2,564 µg/ml; SNU387, 3,182 µg/ml; SNU449, 2,450 µg/ml) for 48 h at 37°C. Following treatment, 10 µl Cell Counting kit-8 solution was added and the cells were incubated at 37°C for a further 3 h. Subsequently, absorbance at 450 nm was measured using an MRX II microplate reader (Dynex Technologies, Inc., Chantilly, VA, USA). Relative cell viability was calculated as a percentage of the untreated controls.

Western blot analysis

To extract proteins after 48 h of treatment, cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) containing protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was added to harvested HCC cells in an ice bath. Cells were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C following the lysis. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration was measured with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). The protein samples (40 µg/lane) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked with Tris-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) containing 5% bovine serum albumin at 37°C for 2 h, and incubated overnight at 4°C with the eIF-5A-2 primary antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; ab150439; diluted 1:1,000 in TBST). The membranes were washed 3 times with TBST and were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Abcam; ab97051; 1:2,000) for 2 h at room temperature. The protein bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK). Bands were quantified by densitometry using Image Lab version 5.0 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.; cat no. 5174S; diluted 1:2,000 in TBST) was used as an internal control.

5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation assay

HCC cell lines were seeded onto 96-well plates at a density of 5×103 cells/well in their respective growth medium. The medium was replaced with the corresponding serum-free medium to synchronize the cells. After 24 h, the serum-free medium was replaced with growth medium containing drugs at the aforementioned concentrations (Cetuximab: Hep3B, 2,229 µg/ml; Huh7, 2,564 µg/ml; SNU387, 3,182 µg/ml; SNU449, 2,450 µg/ml) for 48 h. Cell proliferation was assessed through an EdU assay using the Click-iTEdU Imaging kit (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocols, and cells were counterstained with 100 µl Hoechst 3342 at room temperature for 30 min in the dark.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from Hep3B, Huh7, SNU387 and SUN449 cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA, USA) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using Prime Script reagent RT kit (Takara Biotechnology, Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) and the following thermocycling conditions: 42°C for 2 min, 15 min at 37°C and 5 sec at 85°C. Expression of eIF-5A-2 mRNA was normalized to U6 and relative quantification was performed using the comparative 2−ΔΔCt method (31). SYBR Green PCR (Takara Biotechnology, Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) was performed at 95°C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 sec and annealing at 60°C for 30 sec. All reactions were performed in triplicate. The primers were as follows: eIF-5A-2 forward, 5′-TATGCAGTGCTCGGCCTTG-3′, and reverse, 5′-TTGGAACATCCATGTTGTGAGTAGA-3′; and miR-9, 5′-TCTTTGGTTATCTAGCTGTATGA-3′. Negative control: Sense, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ and antisense, 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Comparisons between 2 independent groups were performed using Student's t-test P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-9 regulates the sensitivity of HCC cells with an epithelial phenotype to cetuximab

To assess whether miR-9 acted in a synergistic or antagonistic manner with cetuximab, HCC cell lines were treated with cetuximab alone, or cetuximab with an miR-9 mimic or inhibitor for 48 h. A CCK-8 assay was then used to assess the cytotoxicity of cetuximab. As demonstrated in Fig. 1A and B, compared with cetuximab treatment alone, the addition of a miR-9 mimic significantly increased the sensitivity to cetuximab, while the addition of a miR-9 inhibitor significantly decreased the sensitivity of epithelial phenotype HCC cells (Hep3B and Huh7). In the mesenchymal phenotype HCC SNU387 and SNU449 cells, no significant differences were observed among the groups (Fig. 1C and D). EdU incorporation assays were also performed to determine the effects on proliferation of each treatment condition. The results revealed that the proliferation of HCC cells (Fig. 1E and F) was significantly reduced following treatment with cetuximab plus the miR-9 mimic and significantly increased following treatment with cetuximab plus the miR-9 inhibitor in the Hep3B and Huh7 cells. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the mesenchymal phenotype HCC cells (Fig. 1G and H). Taken together, these results demonstrate that miR-9 may enhance the sensitivity of epithelial phenotype HCC cells to cetuximab.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Overexpression of miR-9 enhances sensitivity of epithelial HCC cells to cetuximab. (A-D) Viability of HCC cells treated with cetuximab in the presence of a miR-9 mimic or inhibitor. (E-H) Photomicrographs and bar charts depicting EdU staining and relative EdU-positive ratios, respectively, of HCC cells following treatment with cetuximab, with cetuximab plus a miR-9 mimic or with cetuximab plus miR-9 inhibitor for 48 h. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. control, Hep3B: PmiR-9 mimic+Cet=0.0025, PmiR-9 inhibitor+Cet=0.0295, Huh7: PmiR-9 mimic+Cet=0.0356, PmiR-9 inhibitor+Cet=0.0480. All experiments were performed ≥3 times. miR-9, microRNA-9; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; EdU, 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; Cet, cetuximab.

miR-9 regulates the expression of eIF-5A-2

Bioinformatics analysis using Targetscan software suggested that eIF-5A-2 was a target gene of miR-9 (Fig. 2A). RT-qPCR was used to determine the miR-9 and eIF-5A-2 mRNA expression in HCC cell lines (Fig. 2B). Mesenchymal phenotype SNU387 and SNU449 cell lines were revealed to exhibit higher miR-9 expression than the epithelial phenotype Hep3B and Huh7 cell lines. The expression of eIF-5A-2 was negatively associated with the expression of miR-9 in the HCC cells. RT-qPCR was then performed to evaluate the effects of miR-9 on the expression of eIF-5A-2 mRNA. eIF-5A-2 mRNA expression was markedly decreased when HCC cells were transfected with the miR-9 mimic, compared with that in cells transfected with the negative control mimic. By contrast, transfection with an miR-9 inhibitor enhanced the expression of eIF-5A-2 mRNA (Fig. 2C). RT-qPCR was used to determine the expression of miR-9 following treatment with an miR-9 mimic or inhibitor, the results demonstrated that miR-9 expression was increased after transfection with miR-9 mimic and was decreased after transfected with miR-9 inhibitor compared with the control (Fig. 2D). Western blot analysis demonstrated downregulation of eIF-5A-2 in miR-9 mimic-transfected HCC cells and upregulation of eIF-5A-2 in miR-9 inhibitor-transfected HCC cells (Fig. 2E).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

miR-9 modulates expression of eIF-5A-2 in HCC cell lines. (A) miR-9 target site in eIF-5A-2 predicted by TargetScan. (B) Expression of miR-9 and eIF-5A-2 mRNA in HCC cells as determined by RT-qPCR. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs. Huh7; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs. Hep3B. (C) eIF-5A-2 expression in HCC cells following treatment with a miR-9 mimic or inhibitor as determined by RT-qPCR. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs. the control. (D) Expression levels of miR-9 following treatment with a miR-9 mimic or inhibitor as determined by RT-qPCR. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs. the control (E) Western blot analysis was used to detect eIF-5A-2 expression in the various HCC cell lines in the presence of the miR-9 mimic, inhibitor and control. *P<0.05 vs. negative siRNA. miR-9, microRNA-9; eIF-5A-2; eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction; miRNA, microRNA; UTR, untranslated region.

Knockdown of eIF-5A-2 enhances cetuximab sensitivity in epithelial phenotype HCC cells

To determine whether altered expression of eIF-5A-2 may affect the sensitivity of HCC cells to cetuximab, eIF-5A-2 siRNA or a negative control siRNA were transfected into the HCC cell lines. Western blot analysis was used to examine the knockdown efficiency (Fig. 3A). A CCK-8 assay was then used to measure cell viability following treatment with cetuximab. It was revealed that knockdown of eIF-5A-2 significantly improved cetuximab-induced growth inhibition in epithelial HCC cells (Fig. 3B and C), but had no significant effect on mesenchymal HCC cells (Fig. 3D and E). These data suggest that eIF-5A-2 is involved in the sensitivity of epithelial HCC cells to cetuximab.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Sensitivity of HCC cell lines to cetuximab. (A) Western blot analysis of eIF-5A-2 expression in eIF-5A-2 siRNA-transfected cells. GAPDH served as a loading control. Knockdown of eIF-5A-2 enhanced the sensitivity of the epithelial phenotype HCC cells, (B) Hep3B and (C) Huh7, to cetuximab, but had no significant effect on the mesenchymal phenotype HCC cells, (D) SNU387 and (E) SNU449. *P<0.05 vs. negative siRNA. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; eIF-5A-2; eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2; siRNA, small interfering RNA.

miR-9 regulates the sensitivity of epithelial phenotype HCC cells to cetuximab through eIF-5A-2

In order to determine whether or not miR-9 enhanced the sensitivity of epithelial HCC cells to cetuximab through regulation of eIF-5A-2, HCC cells were transfected with eIF-5A-2 siRNA and the viability of HCC cell lines treated with cetuximab alone, with cetuximab plus a miR-9 mimic or with cetuximab plus a miR-9 inhibitor, for 48 h was measured. The results demonstrated that silencing of eIF-5A-2 resulted in no significant differences in the viability of cells treated with cetuximab with or without a miR-9 mimic or an inhibitor (Fig. 4A-D). Therefore, we hypothesized that miR-9 increased the sensitivity of these cells to cetuximab through the regulation of eIF-5A-2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Cytotoxicity of cetuximab or cetuximab plus an miR-9 mimic or inhibitor in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, (A) Huh7, (B) Hep3B, (C) SNU387 and (D) SNU449, treated with eIF-5A-2 siRNA. miR-9, microRNA-9.

Discussion

miRNAs are a family of small interfering RNAs that modulate gene expression in a sequence-specific manner (32). miRNAs have been revealed to serve critical roles in cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis and drug resistance (32). Several studies have demonstrated that upregulation of miR-9 expression is associated with enhanced tumor cell invasion and a poor prognosis (33,34). These studies support a role for miR-9 as an oncogene in these tumor types. Notably, miR-9 has also been reported as a tumor suppressor in various human cancer types. These studies have demonstrated that miR-9 may inhibit cancer cell proliferation. Taken together, these data indicate that miR-9 may act either as an oncogene or as a tumor suppressor. In the present study, the effects of miR-9 on HCC cells were examined and miR-9 overexpression was revealed to inhibit HCC cell proliferation. A CCK-8 assay was used to determine the effect of miR-9 on cell viability following treatment with cetuximab. An miR-9 mimic significantly increased the sensitivity of epithelial phenotype HCC cells to cetuximab, while an miR-9 inhibitor significantly decreased cetuximab sensitivity in these cells.

eIF-5A-2 serves important roles in cell proliferation, metastasis and apoptosis, and is considered as a novel oncogene (28). Accumulating evidence has demonstrated upregulated expression of eIF-5A-2 in a number of cancer types, such as bladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and colon cancer (35–37). Inhibition of eIF-5A-2 may decrease invasion and metastasis, and enhance the therapeutic efficacy of drugs in HCC cells (38,39). Cetuximab, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of EGFR, is used to treat several cancer types (40); for example, it is used for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (41,42). It has been demonstrated that combination treatment with the eIF-5A-2 inhibitor, GC7, enhances cetuximab sensitivity by inhibiting eIF-5A-2 in non-small cell lung cancer (43). Studies identified activated EGFR as a potential determinant that promoted the resistance of HCC cells to sorafenib, while inhibition of EGFR with cetuximab increased the efficacy of sorafenib (44). Furthermore, a novel signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 inhibitor, NSC 74859, enhanced the anti-proliferative activity of cetuximab in HCC (45). However, single use of cetuximab was only slightly effective in clinical trials and drug resistance may be an issue. It is therefore imperative to increase the cytotoxicity of cetuximab in the treatment of HCC. In the present study, Huh7 cells were the most resistant to cetuximab among all the HCC cell lines. Notably, the eIF-5A-2 mRNA expression in the Huh7 cells was higher than that in the other HCC cell lines. The siRNA-mediated silencing of eIF-5A-2 resulted in enhanced sensitivity of the HCC cells to cetuximab. We also confirmed that inhibition of eIF-5A-2 could enhance the cytotoxicity of cetuximab in HCC. These discoveries indicate that eIF-5A-2 may be involved in cetuximab resistance in HCC cell lines. In the present study, miR-9 overexpression was revealed to downregulate the expression of eIF-5A-2 mRNA, while an miR-9 inhibitor increased eIF-5A-2 mRNA expression. These findings indicate that miR-9 may regulate the expression of eIF-5A-2. Additionally, the effects of miR-9 on cetuximab sensitivity were revealed to be eliminated by knockdown of eIF-5A-2 with siRNA.

In summary, the present study demonstrated that overexpression of miR-9 downregulated the expression of eIF-5A-2 and enhanced the sensitivity of epithelial phenotype HCC cells to cetuximab. Taken together, these results indicate that the use of miR-9 may serve as a potential therapeutic approach for HCC in the future.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81273260), the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (grant no. 162300410274) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. LQ13H160006).

References

  • 1.Faloppi L, Scartozzi M, Maccaroni E, Di Pietro Paolo M, Berardi R, Del Prete M, Cascinu S. Evolving strategies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: From clinical-guided to molecularly-tailored therapeutic options. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sapisochin G, de Sevilla EF, Echeverri J, Charco R. Management of ‘very early’ hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhotic patients. World J Hepatol. 2014;6:766–775. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i11.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thomas RK. Overcoming drug resistance in ALK-rearranged lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1250–1251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1316173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Selcuklu SD, Donoghue MT, Rehmet K, de Souza Gomes M, Fort A, Kovvuru P, Muniyappa MK, Kerin MJ, Enright AJ, Spillane C. MicroRNA-9 inhibition of cell proliferation and identification of novel miR-9 targets by transcriptome profiling in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:29516–29528. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.335943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Song Y, Li J, Zhu Y, Dai Y, Zeng T, Liu L, Li J, Wang H, Qin Y, Zeng M, et al. MicroRNA-9 promotes tumor metastasis via repressing E-cadherin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5:11669–11680. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:857–866. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cui EH, Li HJ, Hua F, Wang B, Mao W, Feng XR, Li JY, Wang X. Serum microRNA 125b as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker for advanced NSCLC patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2013;34:309–313. doi: 10.1038/aps.2012.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Perell K, Vincent M, Vainer B, Petersen BL, Federspiel B, Møller AK, Madsen M, Hansen NR, Friis-Hansen L, Nielsen FC, Daugaard G. Development and validation of a microRNA based diagnostic assay for primary tumor site classification of liver core biopsies. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xin H, Li X, Yang B, Zhang L, Han Z, Han C. Blood-based multiple-microRNA assay displays a better diagnostic performance than single-microRNA assay in the diagnosis of breast tumor. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:12635–12643. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2587-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schetter AJ, Leung SY, Sohn JJ, Zanetti KA, Bowman ED, Yanaihara N, Yuen ST, Chan TL, Kwong DL, Au GK, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles associated with prognosis and therapeutic outcome in colon adenocarcinoma. JAMA. 2008;299:425–436. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.4.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834–838. doi: 10.1038/nature03702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhu SM, Chen CM, Jiang ZY, Yuan B, Ji M, Wu FH, Jin J. MicroRNA-185 inhibits cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting Six2. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20:1712–1719. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Deng B, Qu L, Li J, Fang J, Yang S, Cao Z, Mei Z, Sun X. MiRNA-211 suppresses cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting SPARC in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26679. doi: 10.1038/srep26679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 14.Guo LM, Pu Y, Han Z, Liu T, Li YX, Liu M, Li X, Tang H. MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1. FEBS J. 2009;276:5537–5546. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tsai KW, Liao YL, Wu CW, Hu LY, Li SC, Chan WC, Ho MR, Lai CH, Kao HW, Fang WL, et al. Aberrant hypermethylation of miR-9 genes in gastric cancer. Epigenetics. 2011;6:1189–1197. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.10.16535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang H, Qi M, Li S, Qi T, Mei H, Huang K, Zheng L, Tong Q. microRNA-9 targets matrix metalloproteinase 14 to inhibit invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis of neuroblastoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:1454–1466. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zheng L, Qi T, Yang D, Qi M, Li D, Xiang X, Huang K, Tong Q. microRNA-9 suppresses the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells through targeting cyclin D1 and Ets1. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Muraoka T, Soh J, Toyooka S, Maki Y, Shien K, Furukawa M, Ueno T, Tanaka N, Yamamoto H, Asano H, et al. Impact of aberrant methylation of microRNA-9 family members on non-small cell lung cancers. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1:185–189. doi: 10.3892/mco.2012.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang J, Zhao H, Tang D, Wu J, Yao G, Zhang Q. Overexpressions of microRNA-9 and microRNA-200c in human breast cancers are associated with lymph node metastasis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2013;28:283–288. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu S, Jia S, Xu P. MicroRNA-9 as a novel prognostic biomarker in human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:5523–5528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou X, Marian C, Makambi KH, Kosti O, Kallakury BV, Loffredo CA, Zheng YL. MicroRNA-9 as potential biomarker for breast cancer local recurrence and tumor estrogen receptor status. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhu L, Chen H, Zhou D, Li D, Bai R, Zheng S, Ge W. MicroRNA-9 up-regulation is involved in colorectal cancer metastasis via promoting cell motility. Med Oncol. 2012;29:1037–1043. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-9975-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sun J, Fang K, Shen H, Qian Y. MicroRNA-9 is a ponderable index for the prognosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:17748–17756. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Clement PM, Johansson HE, Wolff EC, Park MH. Differential expression of eIF5A-1 and eIF5A-2 in human cancer cells. FEBS J. 2006;273:1102–1114. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05135.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee NP, Tsang FH, Shek FH, Mao M, Dai H, Zhang C, Dong S, Guan XY, Poon RT, Luk JM. Prognostic significance and therapeutic potential of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:968–976. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang GF, Xie D, Liu JH, Luo JH, Li LJ, Hua WF, Wu HM, Kung HF, Zeng YX, Guan X. Expression and amplification of eIF-5A2 in human epithelial ovarian tumors and overexpression of EIF-5A2 is a new in dependent predictor of outcome in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112:314–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Luo JH, Hua WF, Rao HL, Liao YJ, Kung HF, Zeng YX, Guan XY, Chen W, Xie D. Overexpression of EIF-5A2 predict s tumor recurrence and progression in pTa/pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:896–902. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01126.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.He LR, Zhao HY, Li BK, Liu YH, Liu MZ, Guan XY, Bian XW, Zeng YX, Xie D. Overexpression of eIF5A-2 is an adverse prognostic marker of survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:143–150. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tang DJ, Dong SS, Ma NF, Xie D, Chen L, Fu L, Lau SH, Li Y, Li Y, Guan XY. Overexpression of eukaryotic initiation factor 5A2 enhances cell motility and promotes tumor metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2010;51:1255–1263. doi: 10.1002/hep.23451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhu W, Cai MY, Tong ZT, Dong SS, Mai SJ, Liao YJ, Bian XW, Lin MC, Kung HF, Zeng YX, et al. Overexpression of EIF5A2 promotes colorectal carcinoma cell aggressiveness by upregulating MTA1 through C-myc to induce epithelial-mesenchymaltransition. Gut. 2012;61:562–575. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: Small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:522–531. doi: 10.1038/nrg1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sun Z, Han Q, Zhou N, Wang S, Lu S, Bai C, Zhao RC. MicroRNA-9 enhances migration and invasion through KLF17 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2013;7:884–894. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ye M, Du YL, Nie YQ, Zhou ZW, Cao J, Li YF. Overexpression of activated leukocute cell adhesion molecule in gastric cancer is associated with advanced stages and poor prognosis and miR-9 deregulation. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11:2004–2012. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xie D, Ma NF, Pan ZZ, Wu HX, Liu YD, Wu GQ, Kung HF, Guan XY. Overexpression of EIF-5A2 is associated with metastasis of human colorectal carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shek FH, Fatima S, Lee NP. Implications of the use of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) for prognosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Hepatol. 2012;2012:760928. doi: 10.1155/2012/760928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wei JH, Cao JZ, Zhang D, Liao B, Zhong WM, Lu J, Zhao HW, Zhang JX, Tong ZT, Fan S, et al. EIF5A2 predicts outcome in localised invasive bladder cancer and promotes bladder cancer cell aggressiveness in vitro and in vivo. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:1767–1777. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lou B, Fan J, Wang K, Chen W, Zhou X, Zhang J, Lin S, Lv F, Chen Y. N1-guanyl-1,7-diaminoheptane (GC7) enhances the therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin by inhibiting activation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2 (eIF5A2) and preventing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319:2708–2717. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu RR, Lv YS, Tang YX, Wang YF, Chen XL, Zheng XX, Xie SZ, Cai Y, Yu J, Zhang XN. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2 regulates the migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via pathways involving reactive oxygen species. Oncotarget. 2016;7:24348–24360. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Iida M, Brand TM, Starr MM, Huppert EJ, Luthar N, Bahrar H, Coan JP, Pearson HE, Salgia R, Wheeler DL. Overcoming acquired resistance to cetuximab by dual targeting HER family receptors with antibody-based therapy. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:242. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:567–578. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cuninham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, Santoro A, Best D, Mueser M, Harstrick A, Verslype C, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–345. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang X, Jiang R, Cui EH, Feng WM, Guo HH, Gu DH, Tang CW, Xue T, Bao Y. N1-guanyl-1,7-diaminoheptane enhances the chemosensitivity of NSCLC cells to cetuximab through inhibition of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2 activation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20:1244–1250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ezzoukhry Z, Louandre C, Trécherel E, Godin C, Chauffert B, Dupont S, Diouf M, Barbare JC, Maziere JC, Galmiche A. EGFR activation is a potential determinant of primary resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:2961–2969. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen W, Shen X, Xia X, Xu G, Ma T, Bai X, Liang T. NSC 74859-mediated inhibition of STAT3 enhances the anti-proliferative activity of cetuximab in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2012;32:70–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES