Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017 Aug 19;59(1):30–37. doi: 10.1002/em.22122

In vivo Pig-a and micronucleus study of the prototypical aneugen vinblastine sulfate

Svetlana L Avlasevich 1, Carson Labash 1, Dorothea K Torous 1, Jeffrey C Bemis 1, James T MacGregor 2, Stephen D Dertinger 1
PMCID: PMC5773054  NIHMSID: NIHMS928613  PMID: 28833575

Abstract

The Pig-a assay is being used in regulatory studies to evaluate the potential of agents to induce somatic cell gene mutations and an OECD test guideline is under development. A working group involved with establishing the guideline recently noted that representative aneugenic agents had not been evaluated, and to help fill this data gap Pig-a mutant phenotype and micronucleated reticulocyte frequencies were measured in an integrated study design to assess the mutagenic and cytogenetic damage responses to vinblastine sulfate exposure. Male Sprague Dawley rats were treated for twenty-eight consecutive days with vinblastine dose levels from 0.0156 to 0.125 mg/kg/day. Micronucleated reticulocyte frequencies in peripheral blood were determined at Days 4 and 29, and mutant cell frequencies were determined at Days −4, 15, 29, and 46. Vinblastine affected reticulocyte frequencies, with reductions noted during the treatment phase and increases observed following cessation of treatment. Micronucleated reticulocyte frequencies were significantly elevated at Day 4 in the high dose group. Although a statistically significant increase in mutant reticulocyte frequencies were found for one dose group at a single time point (Day 46), it was not deemed biologically relevant because there was no analogous finding in mutant RBCs, it occurred at the lowest dose tested, and only 1 rat exceeded an upper bound tolerance interval established with historical negative control rats. Therefore, whereas micronucleus induction reflects vinblastine’s well-established aneugenic effect on hematopoietic cells, the lack of a Pig-a response indicates that this tubulin-binding agent does not cause appreciable mutagenicity in this same cell type.

Keywords: Pig-a gene, mutation, aneugen, micronuclei, genotoxicity

Introduction

Lack of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored protein(s) on the cell surface of hematopoietic cells can be used as a reporter of phosphatidylinositol glycan-class A (Pig-a) gene mutation [Araten et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2001; Bryce et al., 2008; Miura et al., 2008; Rondelli et al., 2013]. Flow cytometric analysis, in conjunction with antibodies against GPI-anchored cell surface markers such as CD59, allows one to score the incidence of non-fluorescent mutant cells relative to fluorescent wild-type cells. To date, studies involving rodent models have mainly focused on circulating erythrocytes, as these cells are easily obtained in sufficient quantity via small volume blood draws [Gollapudi et al., 2015]. The low blood volume requirement, the Pig-a assay’s compatibility with commonly used rodent strains, and the relatively low cost of these studies relative to other test systems makes this assay particularly attractive for studies of somatic cell mutations [Dobrovolsky et al., 2010; Schuler et al., 2011].

The in vivo Pig-a assay has been evaluated in international trials comprised of industry, regulatory agencies, and academia, with important expertise and organizational support provided by the Health and Environmental Science Institute’s Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee (HESI-GTTC), as well as the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) [Schuler et al., 2011; Gollapudi et al., 2015]. Data generated to date demonstrate that with proper training inter- and intra-laboratory reproducibility as well as intra-laboratory repeatability of erythrocyte-based Pig-a assays are very high [Dertinger et al., 2011a; Kimoto et al., 2013 and 2016; Gollapudi et al., 2015; Johnson et al., 2016; Raschke et al., 2016]. Furthermore, experience to date with reference genotoxicants indicates that flow cytometric analysis is capable of detecting treatment-related increases in the frequencies of mutant phenotype cells in the context of both short-term as and more protracted exposure schedules [Dertinger et al., 2012; Kimoto et al., 2016].

Acceptance of the rodent Pig-a in vivo gene mutation assay for regulatory applications requires documentation of responses to genotoxic chemicals that have been shown to act by different mechanisms of action. In 2013 the IWGT Pig-a Workgroup called attention to the fact that to their knowledge aneugens had not been tested [Gollapudi et al., 2015]. To address this gap we chose to study vinblastine sulfate (VB), a vinca alkaloid used to treat a variety of cancers. VB is regarded as a potent aneugen, and this is attributable to its tubulin-binding properties that interfere with microtubule assembly and consequently leads to malsegregation of chromosomes during cell division. The agent’s genotoxic mode of action is therefore most clearly documented at the chromosome level, especially aneugenicity via chromosome lag and/or non-disjunction. For example multiple reports document that VB and other vinca alkaloids induce in vivo micronucleus formation in erythrocyte-based assays [Vanparys et al., 1990; MacGregor et al., 2006], whereas single strand breaks and other lesions detected in the Comet assay are negative [Recio et al., 2010]. Furthermore, using an in vitro assay system (tk+/− mouse lymphoma assay) in conjunction with DNA sequencing as well as microsatellite markers and whole chromosome probes, Honma and colleagues observed that VB-induced trifluorothymidine-resistant colonies were the result of allelic loss and not the result of tk locus gene mutation [Honma et al., 2001].

The studies described above suggest that an X-chromosome-residing reporter such as Pig-a will not reliably detect loss of gene function resulting from chromosome malsegregation-type events, whereas the micronucleus endpoint, conducted with cells of the same origin, should be responsive to VB’s aneugenic mode of action. The experiments described herein were performed to directly test this hypothesis, and thereby contribute to a better understanding of the type(s) of genotoxic activities detected by rodent Pig-a assays.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

VB (CAS No. 143-67-9) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO. Reagents used for flow cytometric enumeration of mutant erythrocytes (RBCCD59−) and mutant reticulocytes (RETCD59−) were from Rat MutaFlow® Kits and included Anticoagulant Solution, Buffer Solution, Nucleic Acid Dye Solution (contains SYTO® 13), Anti-CD59-PE, and Anti-CD61-PE (Litron Laboratories, Rochester, NY). Reagents used for flow cytometric MN-RET scoring (Anticoagulant Solution, Buffer Solution, DNA Stain, Anti-CD71-FITC and Anti-CD61-PE Antibodies, RNase Solution, and Malaria Biostandards) were from In Vivo Rat MicroFlow® Kits (Litron Laboratories). Additional supplies included Lympholyte®-Mammal cell separation reagent from CedarLane, Burlington, NC; Anti-PE MicroBeads, LS Columns, and a QuadroMACS Separator from Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany; and CountBright Absolute Count Beads and fetal bovine serum (FBS) from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA.

Animals, Treatments, Blood Harvests

Experiments were conducted with the oversight of the University of Rochester’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA. Rodents were allowed to acclimate for approximately one week, and their age at the start of treatment was approximately 7 weeks. Water and food were available ad libitum throughout the acclimation and experimental periods. VB was prepared at 0.714 mg/mL in 0.9% saline and 1mL aliquots were frozen at −20°C until use. For each of 28 consecutive days of administration, one aliquot was thawed and added to 0.9% saline to prepare working solutions of 0, 0.003125, 0.00625, 0.0125, 0.025 mg/mL. Administration was by intraperitoneal injection at 5 mL/kg body weight/day, for final dose levels of 0, 0.015625, 0.03125, 0.06125, or 0.125 mg/kg/day. Dose levels were chosen based on an 8-day dose range-finding experiment. Even so, during the definitive study morbidity became evident by Day 18 and only 2 of 6 rats in the highest dose group were treated beyond Day 22 for the intended 28 days.

Peripheral blood was collected four days before the first administration (i.e., Day −4) and mutant cell frequencies in these pre-dose blood samples were used to exclude animals that exhibited unusually high spontaneous frequencies. Rats with RETCD59− or RBCCD59− frequencies above the following upper bound values were deselected from the study: > 2.9 RETCD59− and/or > 2.9 RBCCD59− per million. These limit values correspond to one-sided 95% tolerance intervals (alpha = 0.05) [Vardeman, 1992], and provide coverage for 99% of future results based on a historical control database that includes 756 individual rats. Once sufficient numbers of animals were identified for the study, they were randomly assigned to treatment groups (n = 6 per group).

Peripheral blood samples were also collected on Days 4, 15, 29, and 46. In all cases, blood was obtained by nicking a lateral tail vein with a surgical blade after animals were warmed briefly under a heat lamp. Approximately 200 μL of free-flowing blood were collected directly into heparinized capillary tubes (Fisher Scientific, CAT no. 22-260-950). For Pig-a analyses, 80 μL of each blood sample were transferred to tubes containing 100 μL kit-supplied heparin solution where they remained at room temperature for less than 2 hr until leukodepletion as described previously [Dertinger et al., 2012]. For the MN-RET endpoint, 30 μL of each whole blood sample were transferred to tubes containing 100 μL kit-supplied heparin solution where they remained at room temperature for less than 2 hrs, after which they were fixed with ultracold methanol [Torous et al., 2003].

Micronucleated Reticulocytes: Sample Preparation, Data Acquisition

MN-RET and reticulocyte (RET) frequencies were scored for Day 4 and 29 blood samples via flow cytometry according to the In Vivo Rat MicroFlow Kit manual, these procedures are described in detail previously [Torous et al., 2003; Dertinger et al., 2004]. MN-RET frequency measurements were based on the acquisition of approximately 20,000 CD71-positive RET per blood sample. Instrument setup and calibration was performed using kit-supplied biological standards (P. berghei-infected blood cells) [Tometsko et al., 1993]. A BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer running CellQuest Pro v5.2 software was used for data acquisition and analysis.

Pig-a Mutation: Sample Preparation, Data Acquisition

RETCD59− and RBCCD59− frequencies were determined using Day −4, 15, 29, and 46 blood samples via immunomagnetic depletion of wild-type erythrocytes and flow cytometric analysis, as described previously [Dertinger et al., 2011b, 2011c, 2012]. In addition to reducing analysis times to 4 minutes per sample, immunomagnetic depletion made it practical to evaluate many times more cells than is otherwise feasible. For instance on Day 29, an average of 201 × 106 RBCs and 5.72 × 106 RETs per sample were evaluated for the CD59-negative phenotype.

Pig-a sample labeling and washing steps utilized deep-well 96 well plates from Axygen Scientific (cat. no. P-DW-20-C) to facilitate more efficient parallel processing. Flow cytometric analyses were also conducted using 96 well plates (U-bottom, Corning, cat. no. 3799) and the BD High Throughput Sampler (HTS) provided automated, walk-away flow cytometric analysis. These variations are described in the Rat MutaFlow Instruction Manual, v140403 (www.litronlabs.com).

An Instrument Calibration Standard was generated on each day of data acquisition. These samples contained approximately 50% wild-type and 50% mutant-mimic erythrocytes, and as described previously, provided a means to rationally and consistently define the location of CD59-negative cells [Phonethepswath et al., 2010]. A BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer running Diva v6.1.2 software was used for data acquisition and analysis.

Calculations, Statistical Analyses

The formulas used to calculate RBCCD59− and RETCD59− frequencies based on pre- and post-immunomagnetic column data are described in the MutaFlow manual (www.litronlabs.com). The frequency of RETs and MN-RET were initially calculated as percentages, and the incidence of mutant phenotype cells were converted to number per 106 cells. All %RET, %MN-RET, mutant cell frequencies, averages, and standard error calculations were performed in Excel Office X for Mac® (Microsoft, Seattle, WA).

For statistical evaluations, %MN-RET and RBCCD59− and RETCD59− frequencies (number per 106) were log(10) transformed. Since zero RETCD59− values were occasionally observed, a 0.1 offset was added to each RETCD59− per 106 number prior to log transformation. Each time point was studied separately, where the effect of treatment on these transformed MN-RET, RBCCD59−, and RETCD59− data was compared to vehicle control using Dunnett’s multiple comparison t-tests in the context of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model (JMP, v12.0.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Significance was evaluated at the 5% level using a one-tailed test for increases relative to vehicle control. These same analyses were performed with %RET data as well, however in these cases data were not log transformed, and the tests were two-tailed.

When Dunnett’s test indicated a significant increase to %MN-RET, RBCCD59−, or RET CD59−, two additional analyses were conducted to assess the biological relevance of the finding. Specifically, for each endpoint and time point in question, the entire set of MN-RET, RBCCD59− or RETCD59− data were evaluated for a dose-related increase. This assessment was performed with JMP’s ANOVA platform, and required a regression effect to be statistically significant using an alpha value of 0.025. Additionally, for any significant treatment group, individual animal’s values were compared against the distribution of historical negative control data in order to evaluate the proportion of animals that exhibited elevated frequencies. As with the study inclusion criteria described above, the Pig-a upper bounds tolerance intervals equal 2.9 RETCD59− × 10−6 and 2.9 RBCCD59− × 10−6. The MN-RET upper bounds tolerance interval (i.e., 0.19%) was based on 212 individual Sprague Dawley rats, a one-sided test with 95% coverage, and an alpha value of 0.05.

Results

Exposure to VB for 28 consecutive days resulted in a reduction to weight gain for the high dose animals (Table I). VB toxicity also significantly reduced RET frequencies (Figure 1). Day 4 %RET, measured during the micronucleus analyses, were significantly reduced in the high dose animals. On Day 15 two high dose rats’ RET frequencies were so low (0.05 and 0.39%) that they precluded estimation of RETCD59− frequencies. Additional indications of bone marrow toxicity were observed on Day 46, when the 0.03125 and 0.125 mg/kg/day groups exhibited significantly lower and higher values relative to concurrent vehicle controls, respectively. In the case of the high dose group, this effect likely reflects compensatory erythropoiesis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Percent reticulocyte (%RET) values are shown for individual rats exposed to one of five dose levels of vinblastine. Data corresponding to blood samples harvested on Days 4, 15, 29, and 46 are shown in panels A, B, C and D, respectively. Panels C and D each show 4 open circle (○) data points that correspond to high dose group rats that were not exposed to vinblastine for the entire 28 days of treatment due to their moribund condition. Green horizontal lines are mean values. Two-tailed Dunnett’s test results are shown to the far right of each graph, where statistically significant differences relative to the concurrent vehicle control group are shown by dose levels written in italicized black text as opposed to red text, and by grey circles as opposed to red circles. Circles’ diameters represent 95% confidence intervals.

RETCD59− frequencies are shown in Figure 2. When evaluated by pair-wise tests, only the low dose group at the Day 46 time point was significantly elevated relative to concurrent vehicle controls. The Day 46 RETCD59− data did not exhibit a significant positive trend (p = 0.5338). Furthermore, only 1 rat in this group of 6 exceeded the historical negative control distribution (Figure 3). Thus, the one slightly elevated RETCD59− group mean was considered not to be biologically significant. No statistically significant increases in RBCCD59− frequencies were observed (Figure 4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mutant reticulocyte (RETCD59−) frequencies are shown for individual rats exposed to one of five dose levels of vinblastine. Note that RETCD59− values (no. per million) have been log(10) transformed. Data corresponding to blood samples harvested on Days 15, 29, and 46 are shown in panels A, B and C, respectively. Panels B and C each show 4 open circle (○) data points that correspond to high dose group rats that were not exposed to vinblastine for the entire 28 days of treatment due to their moribund condition. Green horizontal lines are mean values. One-tailed Dunnett’s test results are shown to the far right of each graph, where statistically significant increases relative to the concurrent vehicle control group are shown by dose levels written in italicized black text as opposed to red text, and by grey circles as opposed to red circles. Circles’ diameters represent 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Historical control mutant reticulocyte (RETCD59−) frequencies (no. mutant cells per million) are graphed for each of 756 male Sprague Dawley rats. These naïve control rats were the same strain and approximate age (7 weeks) used in the current study. One sided (upper bound) tolerance intervals were calculated from these data based on log(10) transformed data, 95% coverage, alpha 0.05. The resulting tolerance interval, back transformed for the purposes of this graphical representation, equals 2.9 × 10−6 Mut RET, and is illustrated in this graph as a dashed line. Individual rat’s Mut RET data for the one statistically significant group (i.e., low dose, Day 46) from the current study are shown at the far right, as red triangles. Only one of these low dose group animals exceeded this upper bound tolerance interval.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mutant erythrocyte (RBCCD59−) frequencies are shown for individual rats exposed to one of five dose levels of vinblastine. Note that RBCCD59− values (no. per million) have been log(10) transformed. Data corresponding to blood samples harvested on Days 15, 29, and 46 are shown in panels A, B and C, respectively. Panels B and C each show 4 open circle (○) data points that correspond to high dose group rats that were not exposed to vinblastine for the entire 28 days of treatment due to their moribund condition. Green horizontal lines are mean values. One-tailed Dunnett’s test results are shown to the far right of each graph. Circles’ diameters represent 95% confidence intervals. No statistically significant increases relative to the concurrent vehicle control group were observed.

VB increased the frequency of MN-RET at the Day 4 time point in the 0.125 mg/kg/day dose group (Figure 5). A positive trend test was evident (p = 0.0032), and the majority of high dose animals (4 of 6) exhibited %MN-RET that exceeded the upper bound 95% tolerance interval (see Figure 6). Day 29 MN-RET showed no statistically significant effect, likely due to the fact that treatment was discontinued in all but 2 high dose group rats beyond Day 22. The two animals that were treated for the intended 28 days exhibited slightly elevated %MN-RET (0.14 and 0.18% MN-RET), but this is difficult to interpret based on only two individual rats. For comparison, the vehicle control averaged 0.11% MN-RET, with SEM of 0.008 and a range of 0.09 to 0.13%.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Micronucleated reticulocyte (MN-RET) frequencies are shown for individual rats exposed to one of five dose levels of vinblastine. Note that MN-RET values (%) have been log(10) transformed. Data corresponding to blood samples harvested on Days 4 and 29 are shown in panels A and B, respectively. Panel B shows 4 open circle (○) data points that correspond to high dose group rats that were not exposed to vinblastine for the entire 28 days of treatment due to their moribund condition. Green horizontal lines are mean values. One-tailed Dunnett’s test results are shown to the far right of each graph. Statistically significant increases relative to the concurrent vehicle control group are shown by dose levels written in italicized black text as opposed to red text, and by grey circles as opposed to red circles. Circles’ diameters represent 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Historical control micronucleated reticulocyte (MN-RET) frequencies (%) are graphed for each of 212 male Sprague Dawley rats. These vehicle control rats were the same strain and approximate age (7 weeks) used in the current study. One sided (upper bound) tolerance intervals were calculated from these data based on log(10) transformed data, 95% coverage, alpha 0.05. The resulting tolerance interval, back transformed for the purposes of this graphical representation, equals 0.19% MN-RET, and is illustrated in this graph as a dashed line. Individual rat’s MN-RET data for the one statistically significant group (i.e., high dose, day 4) from the current study are shown at the far right, as red triangles. The majority of the high dose group animals (4 of 6) exceeded this upper bound tolerance interval.

Discussion

Rodent-based Pig-a mutation assays have been undergoing systematic validation on an international level, with promising results [Dertinger et al., 2011a; Kimoto et al., 2013 and 2016; Gollapudi et al., 2015]. Among the important advances made, the compatibility of erythrocyte-based assays with several mammalian species has been demonstrated [Dobrovolsky et al., 2009, 2011; Bhalli et al., 2011a; Dertinger et al., 2015; Labash et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2016; Olsen et al., 2017]. The suitability of acute versus more protracted treatment schedules has been investigated [Dertinger et al., 2012; Gollapudi et al., 2015; Kimoto et al., 2016]. The effect of sex on baseline and mutagen-induced frequencies was also considered [Labash et al., 2015]. The assay has been successfully adapted to immortalized cells for in vitro screening purposes [Krüger et al., 2015, Nicklas et al., 2015; Rees et al., 2017]. Importantly, DNA sequencing results support the phenotype-genotype basis of the assay [Komoto et al., 2011; Byrne et al., 2014; Revollo et al., 2015; Krüger et al., 2016]. Much progress has also been made in regard to the number and types of chemicals investigated in the in vivo Pig-a assay, including structurally related mutagen/non-mutagen pairs [Bemis et al., 2015; Labash et al., 2016], potent clastogens [Bhalli et al., 2013a], and promutagens that must undergo metabolic activation to form DNA-reactive intermediates [Bhalli et al., 2011b and 2013b; Shi et al., 2011; Dertinger et al., 2012; Avlasevich et al., 2014; Stankowski et al., 2015; Kikuzuki et al., 2016; Koyama et al., 2016].

While the expansion of chemical classes tested has occurred at an impressive rate, to our knowledge no tubulin-binding aneugens have been studied to date. While loss of the X-chromosome (where the Pig-a locus resides) could conceivably result in the GPI anchor-deficient phenotype, we deemed this unlikely for erythroid precursor and progenitor cells that must exhibit sustained self-renewal and terminal differentiation capacities to affect peripheral blood compartment mutant RET and RBC frequencies. This view is in agreement with the IWGT Pig-a Working Group which noted the assay may not be sensitive to aneugenicity since such events would likely lead to cell death and not mutation [Gollapudi et al., 2015]. This study provides the needed data to establish the relative sensitivity of the Pig-a and micronucleus assays to a prototypical tubulin-binding aneugen.

In agreement with VB’s known genotoxic mode of action, Day 4 MN-RET frequencies were significantly elevated. While a statistically significant increase in RETCD59− was found for one dose group at a single time point, its biological relevance is not supported because there was no analogous finding in mutant RBCs, and it occurred only at the lowest dose tested. Also, only 1 rat exceeded an upper bound value established with historical negative control rats. Thus, while VB causes cytogenetic damage to hematopoietic cells in vivo, it does not appear to cause appreciable mutagenicity to this same cell type. These results lend further support the complementary nature of the micronucleus and Pig-a assays, two endpoints that are easily combined into the same study and that utilize a small volume of peripheral blood taken from a single collection.

Table 1.

Vinblastine Dose (mg/kg/day) Mean Weight Gain, Day 1–29 (grams) % of Control
0 146 100
0.015625 157 107
0.03125 140 96
0.0625 144 98
0.125* 118 81
*

These data only include the two rats that were treated for the intended 28-days.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS; grant no. R44ES021973). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIEHS.

Footnotes

Author contributions

S.D.D., J.C.B. and J.T.M. primarily designed these studies. S.L.A., C.L. and D.K.T. executed various aspects of the experiments. S.D.D. primarily wrote the manuscript, with significant input from all authors.

Disclosure

S.L.A., C.L., D.K.T., J.C. and S.D.D. are employees of Litron Laboratories, and J.T.M has been a paid consultant. Litron holds patents covering flow cytometric methods for scoring micronucleated reticulocytes and sells kits based on this technology (In Vivo MicroFlow®). Litron holds patents covering flow cytometric methods for scoring GPI anchor-deficient erythrocytes and sells kits based on this technology (In Vivo MutaFlow®).

References

  1. Araten DJ, Nafa K, Pakdeesuwan K, Luzzatto L. Clonal populations of hematopoietic cells with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria genotype and phenotype are present in normal individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:5209–5214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avlasevich SL, Phonethepswath S, Labash C, Carlson K, Torous DK, Cottom J, Bemis JC, MacGregor JT, Dertinger SD. Diethylnitrosamine genotoxicity evaluated in Sprague Dawley rats using Pig-a mutation and reticulocyte micronucleus assays. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2014;55:400–406. doi: 10.1002/em.21862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhalli JA, Pearce MG, Dobrovolsky VN, Heflch RH. Manifestation and persistence of Pig-a mutant red blood cells in C57BL/6 mice following single and split doses of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011a;52:766–773. doi: 10.1002/em.20682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhalli JA, Shaddock JG, Pearce MG, Dobrovolsky VN, Cao X, Heflich RH, Vohr H-W. Report on Stage III Pig-a mutation assays using benzo[a]pyrene. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011b;52:731–737. doi: 10.1002/em.20675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhalli JA, Shaddock JG, Pearce MG, Dobrovolsky VN. Sensitivity of the Pig-a assay for detecting gene mutation in rats exposed acutely to strong clastogens. Mutagenesis. 2013a;28:447–455. doi: 10.1093/mutage/get022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhalli JA, Ding W, Shaddock JG, Pearce MG, Dobrovolsky VN, Heflich RH. Evaluating the weak in vivo micronucleus response of a genotoxic carcinogen, Aristolochic acids. Mutat Res. 2013b;753:82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bemis JC, Labash C, Avlasevich SL, Carlson K, Berg A, Torous DK, Barragato M, MacGregor JT, Dertinger SD. Rat Pig-a mutation assay responds to the genotoxic carcinogen ethyl carbamate but not the non-genotoxic carcinogen methyl carbamate. Mutagenesis. 2015;30:343–347. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geu084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bryce SM, Bemis JC, Dertinger SD. In vivo mutation assay based on the endogenous Pig-a locus. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008;49:256–264. doi: 10.1002/em.20379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Byrne M, Bennett RL, Cheng X, May WS. Progressive genomic instability in the Nup98-HoxD13 model of MDS correlates with loss of the Pig-a gene product. Neoplasia. 2014;16:627–633. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cao Y, Yang L, Feng N, Shi O, Xi J, You X, Yin C, Yang H, Horibata K, Honma M, Qian B, Weng W, Luan Y. A population study using the human erythrocyte PIG-A assay. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2016;57:605–614. doi: 10.1002/em.22040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen R, Eshleman JR, Brodsky RA, Medof ME. Glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored protein deficiency as a marker of mutator phenotypes in cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61:654–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dertinger SD, Camphausen K, MacGregor JT, Bishop ME, Torous DT, Avlasevich S, Cairns S, Tometsko CR, Menard C, Muanza T, Chen Y, Miller RK, Cederbrant K, Sandelin K, Pontén I, Bolcsfoldi G. Three-color labeling method for flow cytometric measurement of cytogenetic damage in rodent and human blood. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2004;44:427–435. doi: 10.1002/em.20075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dertinger SD, Phonethepswath S, Weller P, Nicolette J, Murray J, Sonders P, Vohr H-W, Shi J, Krsmanovic L, Gleason C, Custer L, Henwood A, Sweder K, Stankowski LF, Jr, Roberts DJ, Giddings A, Kenny J, Lynch AM, Defrain C, Nesslany F, van der Leede B-JM, Van Doninck T, Schuermans A, Tanaka K, Hiwata Y, Tajima O, Wilde E, Elajouji A, Gunther WC, Thiffeault CJ, Shutsky TJ, Fiedler RD, Kimoto T, Bhalli JA, Heflich RH, MacGregor JT. International Pig-a gene mutation assay trial: Evaluation of transferability across fourteen laboratories. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011a;52:690–698. doi: 10.1002/em.20672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dertinger SD, Bryce SM, Phonethepswath S, Avlasevich SL. When pigs fly: Immunomagnetic separation facilitates rapid determination of Pig-a mutant frequency by flow cytometric analysis. Mutat Res. 2011b;721:163–170. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dertinger SD, Phonethepswath S, Weller P, Avlasevich S, Torous DK, Mereness JA, Bryce SM, Bemis JC, Bell S, Portugal S, Aylott M, MacGregor JT. Interlaboratory Pig-a gene mutation assay trial: Studies of 1,3-propane sultone with immunomagnetic enrichment of mutant erythrocytes. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011c;52:748–755. doi: 10.1002/em.20671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dertinger SD, Phonethepswath S, Avlasevich SL, Torous DK, Mereness J, Bryce SM, Bemis JC, Bell S, Weller P, MacGregor JT. Efficient monitoring of in vivo Pig-a gene mutation and chromosomal damage: Summary of 7 published studies and results from 11 new reference compounds. Toxicol Sci. 2012;130:328–348. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dertinger SD, Avlasevich SL, Bemis JC, Chen Y, MacGregor JT. Human erythrocyte PIG-A assay: An easily monitored index of gene mutation requiring low volume blood samples. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015;56:366–377. doi: 10.1002/em.21924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dobrovolsky VN, Shaddock JG, Mittelstaedt RA, Manjanatha MG, Miura D, Uchikawa M, Mattison DR, Morris SM. Evaluation of Macaca mulatta as a model for genotoxicity studies. Mutat Res. 2009;673:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dobrovolsky VN, Miura D, Heflich RH, Dertinger SD. The in vivo Pig-a gene mutation assay, a potential tool for regulatory safety assessment. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2010;51:825–835. doi: 10.1002/em.20627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dobrovolsky VN, Elespuru RK, Bigger CAH, Robison TW, Heflich RH. Monitoring humans for somatic mutation in the endogenous PIG-A gene using red blood cells. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011;52:784–794. doi: 10.1002/em.20667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gollapudi BB, Lynch AM, Heflich RH, Dertinger SD, Dobrovolsky VN, Frötschl R, Horibata K, Kenyon MO, Kimito T, Lovell DP, Stankowski Leon F, Jr, White PA, Witt KL, Tanir JY. The in vivo Pig-a assay: A report of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) Workgroup. Mutat Res. 2015;783:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson GE, Yamamoto M, Suzuki Y, Adachi H, Kyoya T, Takasawa H, Horibata K, Tsutsumi E, Wada K, Kikuzuki R, Yoshida I, Kimoto T, Maeda A, Narumi K. Measuring reproducibility of dose response data for the Pig-a assay using covariate benchmark dose analysis. Mutat Res. 2016;811:135–139. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Honma M, Momose M, Sakamoto H, Sofuni T, Hayashi M. Spindle poisons induce allelic loss in mouse lymphoma cells through mitotic non-disjunction. Mutat Res. 2001;489:101–114. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00167-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kikuzuki R, Sato H, Fujiwara A, Takahashi T, Ogiwara Y, Sugiura M. Evaluation of the RBC Pig-a assay and the PIGRET assay using benzo[a]pyrene in rats. Mutat Res. 2016;811:86–90. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kimoto T, Suzuki K, Kobayashi XM, Dobrovolsky VN, Heflich RH, Miura D, Kasahara Y. Manifestation of Pig-a mutant bone marrow erythroids and peripheral blood erythrocytes in mice treated with N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea: direct sequencing of Pig-a cDNA from bone marrow cells negative for GPI-anchored protein expression. Mutat Res. 2011;723:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kimoto T, Horibata K, Chikura S, Hashimoto K, Itoh S, Sanada H, Muto S, Uno Y, Yamada M, Honma M. Interlaboratory trial of the rat Pig-a mutation assay using an erythroid marker HIS49 antibody. Mutat Res. 2013;755:126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kimoto T, Horibata K, Miura D, Chikura S, Okada Y, Ukai A, Itoh S, Nakayama S, Sanada H, Koyama N, Muto S, Uno Y, Yamamoto M, Suzuki Y, Fukuda T, Goto K, Wada K, Kyoya T, Shigano M, Takasawa H, Hamada S, Adachi H, Uematsu Y, Tsutsumi E, Hori H, Kikuzuki R, Ogiwana Y, Yoshida I, Maeda A, Narumi K, Fujishi Y, Morita T, Yamada M, Honma M. The PIGRET assay, a method for measuring Pig-a gene mutation in reticulocytes, is reliable as a short-term in vivo genotoxicity test: Summary of the MMS/JEMS-collaborative study across 16 laboratories using 24 chemicals. Mutat Res. 2016;811:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Krüger CT, Hofmann M, Hartwig A. The in vitro PIG-A gene mutation assay: mutagenicity testing via flow cytometry based on the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) status of TK6 cells. Arch Toxicol. 2015;89:2429–43. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1413-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Krüger CT, Fischer BM, Armant O, Morath V, Strähle U, Hartwig A. The in vitro PIG-A gene mutation assay: glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-related genotype-to-phenotype relationship in TK6 cells. Arch Toxicol. 2016;90:1729–36. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1707-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Koyama N, Yonezawa Y, Nakamura M, Sanada H. Evaluation for a mutagenicity of aristolochic acid by Pig-a and PIGRET assays in rats. Mutat Res. 2016;811:80–85. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Labash C, Avlasevich SL, Carlson K, Torous DK, Berg A, Bemis JC, MacGregor JT, Dertinger SD. Comparison of male versus female responses in the Pig-a mutation assay. Mutagenesis. 2015;30:349–357. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geu055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Labash C, Avlasevich SL, Carlson K, Berg A, Torous DK, Bryce SM, Bemis JC, MacGregor JT, Dertinger SD. Mouse Pig-a and micronucleus assays respond to N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea, benzo[a]pyrene, and ethyl carbamate, but not pyrene or methyl carbamate. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2016;57:28–40. doi: 10.1002/em.21965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. MacGregor JT, Bishop ME, McNamee JP, Hayashi M, Asano N, Wakata A, Nakajima M, Saito J, Aidoo A, Moore MM, Dertinger SD. Flow cytometric analysis of micronuclei in peripheral blood reticulocytes: II. An efficient method of monitoring chromosomal damage in the rat. Toxicol Sci. 2006;94:92–107. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Miura D, Dobrovolsky VN, Kasahara Y, Katsuura Y, Heflich RH. Development of an in vivo gene mutation assay using the endogenous Pig-A gene: I. Flow cytometric detection of CD59-negative peripheral red blood cells and CD48-negative spleen T-cells from the rat. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008;49:614–621. doi: 10.1002/em.20414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nicklas JA, Carter EW, Albertini RJ. Both PIGA and PIGL mutations cause GPI-a deficient isolates in the Tk6 cell line. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015;56:663–73. doi: 10.1002/em.21953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Olsen A-K, Dertinger SD, Krüger CT, Eide DM, Instanes C, Brunborg G, Hartwig A, Graupner A. The Pig-a gene mutation assay in mice and human cells: A review. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2017 doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12806. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Phonethepswath S, Franklin D, Torous DK, Bryce SM, Bemis JC, Raja S, Avlasevich S, Weller P, Hyrien O, Palis J, MacGregor JT, Dertinger SD. Pig-a mutation: Kinetics in rat erythrocytes following exposure to five prototypical mutagens. Toxicol Sci. 2010;114:59–70. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Raschke M, Igl BW, Kenny J, Collins J, Dertinger SD, Labash C, Bhalli JA, Tebbe CC, McNeil KM, Sutter A. In vivo Pig-a gene mutation assay: Guidance for 3Rs-friendly implementation. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2016;57:678–686. doi: 10.1002/em.22060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Recio L, Hobbs C, Caspary W, Witt KL. Dose-response assessment of four genotoxic chemicals in a combined mouse and rat micronucleus (MN) and Comet assay protocol. J Toxicol Sci. 2010;35:149–162. doi: 10.2131/jts.35.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rees BJ, Tate M, Lynch AM, Thornton CA, Jenkins GJ, Walmsley RM, Johnson GE. Development of an in vitro PIG-A gene mutation assay in human cells. Mutagenesis. 2017;32:283–297. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gew059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rondelli T, Berardi M, Peruzzi B, Boni L, Caporale R, Dolara P, Notaro R, Luzzatto L. The frequency of granulocytes with spontaneous somatic mutations: A wide distribution in a normal human population. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rovollo J, Pearce MG, Petibone DM, Mittelstaedt RA, Dobrovolsky VN. Confirmation of Pig-a mutation in flow cytometry-identified CD48-deficient T-lymphocytes from F344 rats. Mutagenesis. 2015;30:315–324. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geu030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schuler M, Gollapudi BB, Thybaud V, Kim JH. On the need and potential value of the Pig-a in vivo mutation assay—A HESI perspective. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011;52:685–689. doi: 10.1002/em.20687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shi J, Krsmanovic L, Bruce S, Kelly T, Paranjpe M, Szabo K, Arevalo M, Atta-Safoh S, Debelie F, Klug LaForce M, Sly J, Springer S. Assessment of genotoxicity induced by 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) or diethylnitrosamine (DEN) in the Pig-a, micronucleus and Comet assays integrated into 28-day repeat dose studies. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011;52:711–720. doi: 10.1002/em.20678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stankowski LF, Jr, Aardema MJ, Lawlor TE, Pant K, Roy S, Xu Y, Elbekai R. Integration of Pig-a, micronucleus, chromosome aberration and comet assay endpoints in a 28-day rodent toxicity study with urethane. Mutagenesis. 2015;30:335–342. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gev013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tometsko AM, Torous DK, Dertinger SD. Analysis of micronucleated cells by flow cytometry. 1. Achieving high resolution with a malaria model. Mutat Res. 1993;292:129–135. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(93)90140-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Torous DK, Hall NE, Murante FG, Gleason SE, Tometsko CR, Dertinger SD. Comparative scoring of micronucleated reticulocytes in rat peripheral blood by flow cytometry and microscopy. Toxicol Sci. 2003;74:309–314. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vanparys P, Vermeiren F, Sysmans M, Temmerman R. The micronucleus assay as a test for the detection of aneugenic activity. Mutat Res. 1990;244:95–103. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(90)90056-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vardeman SB. What about the other intervals? The American Statistician. 1992;46:193–197. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES