ABSTRACT
Caedibacter taeniospiralis is an obligate endosymbiont living in the cytoplasm of Paramecium tetraurelia. C. taeniospiralis causes the so-called killer trait, eliminating intraspecific competitors of its host when released into the medium by the concerted action of the unusual protein structure R-body (refractile body) in addition to an as-yet-unknown toxin.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Caedibacter taeniospiralis (Thiotrichales, Gammaproteobacteria) lives in the cytoplasm of its host, Paramecium tetraurelia (Ciliophora). This unicellular, relatively large (150-µm) eukaryote separates vegetative and sexual functions, possesses germline and somatic nuclei, and is a long-established model in genetics and epigenetics research (1). A special feature of the Paramecium-Caedibacter symbiosis is the “killer trait.” A proportion of the endosymbiont population produces an unusual protein structure, the R-body (refractile body) (2). This structure, most likely acting as a delivery device for an unidentified toxin, is responsible for killing symbiont-free, sensitive paramecia after the ingestion of bacteria released from infected strains (3). Caedibacter-harboring cells are protected from the lethal effect of their symbionts. Cultivation of C. taeniospiralis outside its host has not been accomplished so far.
Total DNA was isolated from exponentially growing paramecia. Their infection status was verified by fluorescence in situ hybridization, which enabled detection of intracellular C. taeniospiralis 51T, as described elsewhere (4). To minimize contamination from food bacteria, P. tetraurelia cultures (strain 51K = CCAP 1660/3F) were fed with β-lactam-hypersensitive Escherichia coli ΔtolC (5) and treated with 10 µg ml−1 ampicillin before DNA isolation (6). Library preparation for whole-genome sequencing used the tagmentation procedure (7). We generated a library of ~500 to 800 bp for subsequent sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq instrument (2 × 300 nucleotides [nt]). After assembly using the ABySS-pe program (8), 24 contigs were assigned to the genome of C. taeniospiralis. These can be differentiated from the host genome by their nearly identical coverage and by their GC content of 41.5%, diverging to the host genome’s GC content of 28% (9). Draft genome sequences had a total sequence length of 1.3 Mb (N50, 55.531 bp), including the previously known plasmid, pKAP, of 41.7 kb (10). The genome contains three rRNA clusters in 16S-23S-5S configurations.
Gene annotation of the draft sequence was carried out using Prodigal (11), tRNAscan-SE (12), and RNAmmer (13) software tools. Next to 36 tRNA genes, 1,080 protein coding sequences could be identified, of which, 787 could be functionally annotated by a similarity search against the eggNOG database with the eggNOG-mapper software (14).
The genome sequence of C. taeniospiralis strain 51K will improve our understanding of this organism and its symbiotic interaction with P. tetraurelia, including and in addition to the killer trait. The availability of this sequence information enables phylogenomic analyses of the genus Caedibacter and will provide a valuable resource for the identification and analysis of toxin candidates, which might have unusual biological properties that explain the need for the R-body as a delivery device.
Accession number(s).
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number PGGB00000000. The version described in this paper is version PGGB01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the German Science Foundation (grant SI1397/3-1) and the Research Innovation Fund of the Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg.
We are grateful to Jasmin Kirch and Astrid Petersen for their assistance.
Footnotes
Citation Zaburannyi N, Grosser K, Gasparoni G, Müller R, Schrallhammer M, Simon M. 2018. Draft genome sequence and annotation of the obligate bacterial endosymbiont Caedibacter taeniospiralis, causative agent of the killer phenotype in Paramecium tetraurelia. Genome Announc 6:e01418-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01418-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Simon M, Plattner H. 2014. Unicellular eukaryotes as models in cell and molecular biology: critical appraisal to their past and future value. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 309:141–198. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800255-1.00003-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schrallhammer M, Schweikert M. 2009. The killer effect of Paramecium and its causative agents, p 1–21. In Fujishima M. (ed), Endosymbionts in Paramecium, microbiology monographs. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schrallhammer M, Galati S, Altenbuchner J, Schweikert M, Görtz HD, Petroni G. 2012. Tracing the role of R-bodies in the killer trait: absence of toxicity of R-body producing recombinant E. coli on paramecia. Eur J Protistol 48:290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dusi E, Krenek S, Schrallhammer M, Sachse R, Rauch G, Kaltz O, Berendonk TU. 2014. Vertically transmitted symbiont reduces host fitness along temperature gradient. J Evol Biol 27:796–800. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lagkouvardos I, Shen J, Horn M. 2014. Improved axenization method reveals complexity of symbiotic associations between bacteria and acanthamoebae. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:383–388. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.DOE Joint Genome Institute 2012. Bacterial DNA isolation CTAB protocol. http://1ofdmq2n8tc36m6i46scovo2e.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/JGI-Bacterial-DNA-isolation-CTAB-Protocol-2012.pdf.
- 7.Picelli S, Björklund AK, Reinius B, Sagasser S, Winberg G, Sandberg R. 2014. Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects. Genome Res 24:2033–2040. doi: 10.1101/gr.177881.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJ, Birol I. 2009. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res 19:1117–1123. doi: 10.1101/gr.089532.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Aury JM, Jaillon O, Duret L, Noel B, Jubin C, Porcel BM, Ségurens B, Daubin V, Anthouard V, Aiach N, Arnaiz O, Billaut A, Beisson J, Blanc I, Bouhouche K, Câmara F, Duharcourt S, Guigo R, Gogendeau D, Katinka M, Keller AM, Kissmehl R, Klotz C, Koll F, Le Mouël A, Lepère G, Malinsky S, Nowacki M, Nowak JK, Plattner H, Poulain J, Ruiz F, Serrano V, Zagulski M, Dessen P, Bétermier M, Weissenbach J, Scarpelli C, Schächter V, Sperling L, Meyer E, Cohen J, Wincker P. 2006. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444:171–178. doi: 10.1038/nature05230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jeblick J, Kusch J. 2005. Sequence, transcription activity, and evolutionary origin of the R-body coding plasmid pKAP298 from the intracellular parasitic bacterium Caedibacter taeniospiralis. J Mol Evol 60:164–173. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lowe TM, Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W54–W57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lagesen K, Hallin PF, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2017. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol 34:2115–2122. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]