Review of community pharmacy services: what is being performed, and where are the opportunities for improvement?

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this review was to assess pharmacist and pharmacy services being provided and identify opportunities to improve patient satisfaction.

Methods

Studies published between January 2006 and July 2016 examining patient satisfaction with pharmacy and pharmacist services, which were written in English, were identified in PubMed. Studies were excluded if they only looked at pharmacy student-provided services.

Key findings

A total of 50 studies were ultimately included in the review. Of these studies, 28 examined services traditionally provided by community pharmacists such as dispensing and counseling, while 16 examined a new in-person service being offered by a pharmacy, and the remaining six involved a new technology-assisted service. While study findings were generally positive for patient satisfaction of pharmacy services, several opportunities were identified for pharmacies to improve.

Conclusion

Overall, patient satisfaction is high across pharmacy services; however, this satisfaction is related to prior patient exposure to services and their level of expectation. Pharmacists have multiple opportunities to improve the services they provide, and there are additional services pharmacists may consider offering to expand their role within the health care system.

Introduction

In 2014, health care spending in the United States was three trillion dollars and represented 17.5% of the gross domestic product.¹ There are nearly 300,000 pharmacists in the United States, and as the profession continues to evolve, the role that pharmacists play in the health care system is also evolving.² Health care has shifted to a model of quality care for less cost, as a result of not only legislative action but also an increased emphasis on positive patient outcomes, while also dealing with an overall shortage of health care providers.³ This has provided community pharmacists, who were already highly accessible to patients, an opportunity to become more than medication dispensers. The impact pharmacists can have on patient care can be measured not only by clinical outcomes but also by patient satisfaction with the service. This review sought to analyze the available literature on community pharmacy services not only to identify and evaluate what pharmacies are currently doing well to provide patient satisfaction but also to identify opportunities to improve as a profession.

Methods

A systematic search of literature indexed in PubMed during the 10-year period between 2006 and 2016 was conducted to identify the most recent trends in pharmacy services and patient satisfaction. For the search, the terms “pharmacy services”, “patient satisfaction”, and “community” were used. The term “community” was used to capture both community pharmacies and clinics which may be part of a community pharmacy’s services or in a stand-alone facility but are not clearly described. Results were limited to human studies and articles published in English. Articles were included if

1. The study included an intervention, assessment of current service, or comparison between services.

2. The study service was conducted by pharmacists.

3. The focus of the study was on community pharmacies or outpatient clinics.

4. The study examined a community pharmacy service, such as counseling, care management, and immunizations.

Articles were subsequently excluded for review if

1. The title, abstract, or full text of the article indicated that the article did not discuss an outpatient pharmacy service or only looked at student pharmacists.

2. The article was a case study, review, or meta-analysis.

3. The article only focused on inpatient care.

4. The study intervention was conducted by only pharmacy students.

5. The article discussed guidelines/methods/best practices for the design or implementation of a service without application.

6. The full text could not be obtained.

The process of identifying and reviewing articles is shown in Figure 1. Two levels of review were performed. The first was the literature search conducted using the search terms identified, and then all article titles and abstracts were reviewed. The initial search identified 259 articles, which was subsequently reduced to 104 after reviewing the titles and abstracts. The second review involved evaluating the remaining full articles to identify content that met the inclusion criteria. Another 54 articles were excluded because of the focus of the article or the full text not being available. Ultimately, 50 articles were included for review.

Figure 1.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria.

These articles were subsequently classified by the type of service being provided and the scope of practice for that service to more easily assess patient satisfaction with services and how pharmacists may improve the provision of services. For the purposes of this review, the term “pharmacy service” refers only to services provided in the community or outpatient setting. Services were classified as a standard pharmacist activity (Table 1), such as medication counseling and dispensing; a new in-person service (Table 2), such as providing vaccinations or mental health screenings; or a new technology-assisted service (Table 3), such as electronic medication management and distance counseling. Activities were further classified into four groups; 1) standard practice, which means anything pharmacists were traditionally able to perform; 2) a service that required training specifically for the study but fell within what pharmacists were legally able to do; 3) an expanded practice, which means anything that pharmacists have recently been allowed to do, such as vaccinations; and 4) activities that required a collaborative practice agreement to perform.

Table 1.

Studies involving standard pharmacist’s activities included in the review

Reference	Country	Study focus	Results
Watson et al49 Study type: observational Scope of practice: standard practice	Scotland	Compare health- and cost-related outcomes of consultations for minor ailments symptoms	Convenience of location was the most common reason for choice of consultation setting
Akol et al12 Study type: interview Scope of practice: training specifically for study	Uganda	Assess perspectives on the quality of care and satisfaction with intramuscular administration of contraception by drug store owners	Most were satisfied receiving their contraception from the drug shop and intended to get the next injection from the drug shop
Patricia et al8 Study type: descriptive Scope of practice: standard practice	Portugal	Identify factors that contribute to patients’ pharmacy loyalty	Humanistic-based skills were found to promote customers’ visit to pharmacies
Malewski et al6 Study type: survey Scope of practice: standard practice	USA	Examine urban and suburban community pharmacy populations for similarities and differences in patient satisfaction	Satisfaction with pharmacist’s relationship and service high with no significant differences between locations
Mansell et al25 Study type: evaluation Scope of practice: standard practice	Canada	Assess symptomatic improvement for patients treated by a pharmacist	Patients were very satisfied with their symptomatic improvement and with the service in general
Kjeldsen et al21 Study type: randomized control trial Scope of practice: training specifically for study	Denmark	Investigate if a brief, comprehensive individually targeted intervention for diabetic patients could improve drug therapy implementation in pharmacies	The study showed improvement in patient health, well-being, knowledge, and satisfaction
McMillan et al10 Study type: semi-structured interviews Scope of practice: standard practice	Australia	Explore the attributes of pharmacy choice for people with chronic conditions	Five attributes influenced this choice: patient- centered care, convenience, price, personal traits, and service/medication need
Tan et al20 Study type: pre/post-intervention Scope of practice: standard practice	Australia	Evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist’s consultations based on primary care practices	Patients were highly satisfied with the pharmacist’s consultations and were effective in identifying and resolving medication-related problems
Patterson et al7 Study type: cross-sectional study Scope of practice: standard practice	USA	Identify relationships among pharmacy service use, general and service-specific patient satisfaction, pharmacy patronage motives, and marketing awareness	Study participants were mostly satisfied with the pharmacy services on global and service-specific measures
Jaffray et al52 Study type: randomized control trial Scope of practice: training specifically for study	Scotland	Determine whether trained pharmacists can improve methadone outcomes	It did not significantly reduce heroin use, but there are indications of increased communication and satisfaction
Tran et al14 Study type: interviews Scope of practice: standard practice	Australia	Explore pharmacist–consumer interactions about complementary medicines, with focus on consumer expectations, perceptions, and satisfaction	There was high consumer satisfaction, which was in agreement with pharmacist’s perceptions of consumer satisfaction
Rubio-Valera et al23 Study type: randomized control trial Scope of practice: training specifically for study	Spain	Evaluate the impact of a pharmacist’s intervention on patients who had initiated antidepressant treatment	Patients showed improvement in health- related quality of life, but none in clinical symptoms or pharmacy satisfaction
Kaae et al16 Study type: semi-structured interviews Scope of practice: standard practice	Denmark	Investigate how patients perceive pharmacy counseling at the present time, to develop the patient–pharmacy relationship	Customers favor pharmacy OTC medication counseling and first-time prescriptions, but find it hard to express the role of pharmacies
Collum et al13 Study type: pilot study Scope of practice: standard practice	USA	Describe the satisfaction of patients at high risk for medication misadventures with care communication at a clinic-based pharmacy	Few patients reported the use of recommended communication techniques by the pharmacist
Bosse et al24 Study type: evaluation Scope of practice: standard practice	USA	Evaluate if patient adherence to self-care advice from a pharmacist provides satisfactory symptom relief	Patients felt that it led to greater symptom improvement, and would like to see this service offered all of the time
van Geffen et al17 Study type: survey Scope of practice: standard practice	The Netherlands	Assess patient perceptions of received cardiovascular drug information and counseling	Most were unsatisfied with the information received and reported not experiencing some counseling activities
Naik Panvelkar et al15 Study type: interview Scope of practice: standard practice	Australia	Explore patient preferences for types of pharmacy-based asthma services and identify service aspects that patients prefer	Both naive and experienced patients had a high level of satisfaction
Black et al19 Study type: survey Scope of practice: standard practice	Canada	Determine patient preferences, satisfaction, and perceived stigma related to pharmacists	Traditional pharmacy services were perceived to be of greater importance than some clinical services
Simoens et al4 Study type: survey Scope of practice: standard practice	Belgium	Explore patient experiences of purchasing OTC medications in pharmacies	Patients were satisfied with pharmacy distribution and services related to OTC medications
van Geffen et al18 Study type: descriptive Scope of practice: standard practice	The Netherlands	Examine patients’ perceptions of information received when starting a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, to identify needs and the potential role of the pharmacist	Patients felt that they would benefit from tailored information. Many patients required more concrete and practical information than was provided
Hoffmann et al22 Study type: randomized controlled trial Scope of practice: training specifically for study	Germany	Evaluate the effects of pharmaceutical care for patients with headache or migraine, on both clinical and psychological end points	Most participants described this intervention as helpful and effective and reported that they would recommend pharmaceutical care to others
McAuley et al11 Study type: survey Scope of practice: standard practice	USA	Survey patients with epilepsy about the current and potential role pharmacists play/could play in their care	Patients reported good relationships with their pharmacists, but were concerned about lack of privacy and did not want to pay for services
Du Pasquier and Aslani5 Study type: semi-structured interview Scope of practice: standard practice	Australia	Explore consumers’ attitudes toward, and expectations of, adherence support services in a pharmacy	Participants valued two-way communication and increased consideration of their needs/beliefs, but were hesitant about shared decision making

Abbreviation: OTC, over the counter.

Table 2.

Studies involving new in-person services included in the review

Reference	Country	Study focus	Results
Luder et al42 Study type: prospective, quasi-experimental Scope of practice: training specifically for study	USA	If transition of care has decreased hospital readmission, resolved medication problems, and increased patient satisfaction	A community pharmacist in the usual discharge process improved the quality of care and significantly reduced hospital readmissions
O’Neal et al34 Study type: observational Scope of practice: training specifically for study	USA	Develop and assess a tool evaluating the impact of a pharmacist’s training program from the patients’ perspective	A continuing education program is desired and has the potential to impact the quality of life for migraine and recurrent headache sufferers
Hanes et al35 Study type: survey Scope of practice: expanded practice	Australia	Perspectives of pharmacy staff involved in CPAP and sleep apnea-related services	Respondents felt there was room for improvement in some aspect of CPAP service
Jackson et al40 Study type: survey Scope of practice: collaborative practice agreement	USA	Enhance public access to prophylaxis for Lyme disease and assess patient satisfaction with the pharmacy-based service provided	High level of satisfaction with pharmacy services provided, and no reports of subsequent development of symptoms or major adverse events
Rickles et al38 Study type: evaluation Scope of practice: training specifically for study	USA	Evaluate the impact and patient satisfaction of a pharmacy-based cognitive memory screening and referral program	Cognitive memory screening can be easily incorporated into clinical service offerings in a pharmacy
Breslow39 Study type: observational Scope of practice: training specifically for study	USA	Describe patient attitudes and satisfaction toward pharmacist-administered memory screenings	The majority of participants responded favorably to several aspects of offering memory screening in pharmacies
Hui-Callahan et al28 Study type: prospective Scope of practice: training specifically for study	USA	Determine if diabetic patients who used a financial rewards program in a grocery chain pharmacy had increased rates of self- reported healthy behaviors	Satisfaction was favorable. Participants reported that the program increased behavior awareness and accountability, and motivation to improve health
DiDonato et al37 Study type: prospective cohort Scope of practice: standard practice	USA	Assess the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of pharmacist’s health coaching in the workplace	Wellness coaching by a pharmacist can result in significant improvements in cardiovascular risk factors
Warner et al33 Study type: observational Scope of practice: expanded practice	England	Determine if the inclusion of pharmacies improve vaccination rates and is acceptable to patients	Pharmacies can help increase vaccination rates and has high levels of patient acceptability
American Pharmacists Association29 Study type: observational Scope of practice: training specifically for study	USA	Describe the development and implementation of the Discussions on Taking Medications Diabetes Pilot Program and satisfaction	Small, focused interactions addressing issues of concern to patients could improve patient adherence to medication therapy
Shoukry et al36 Study type: qualitative Scope of practice: standard practice	Australia	Explore the experiences of patients with obstructive sleep apnea who get treatment through pharmacies	High satisfaction with pharmacy services was expressed, with convenience and good service as notable characteristics
Saini et al30 Study type: pre/post-intervention Scope of practice: training specifically for study	Australia	Assess any improvements in knowledge of asthma patients after a tailored education program delivered by pharmacists and sustainability of improvements	Asthma knowledge significantly improved as a result of the service, and patients changed the way they managed their asthma
Mitchell et al27 Study type: longitudinal Scope of practice: training specifically for study	Australia	Evaluate the capacity and effectiveness of trained pharmacists in delivering the Diabetes Medication Assistance Service	Patients reported improvements in knowledge about diabetes self-management, and improved glycemic control and adherence
Hugtenburg et al41 Study type: controlled intervention Scope of practice: standard practice	The Netherlands	Evaluate a comprehensive protocol for discharge care on patient satisfaction as well as on drug use compliance and mortality	Patient counseling at discharge from hospital by pharmacists appears to be meaningful
Lea et al32 Study type: survey Scope of practice: standard practice	Australia	Explore consumer satisfaction associated with the delivery of opioid substitution treatment at pharmacies	Participants expressed a high level of satisfaction with most service aspects, but wanted more privacy
Saini et al31 Study type: repeated measures Scope of practice: training specifically for study	Australia	Compare the effect of a pharmacist-delivered rural asthma management service on health outcomes for people with asthma	Patients had a reduction in the asthma severity and risk of nonadherence to medication scores, and an increase in patients with a written action plan

Abbreviation: CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure.

Table 3.

Studies involving new technology-assisted services included in the review

Reference	Country	Study focus	Results
Butler et al43 Study type: survey Scope of practice: standard practice	USA	Patient satisfaction with medication synchronization	All patients were highly satisfied with medication synchronization program, and it should expand to a wider population
Shaw et al48 Study type: observational Scope of practice: training specifically for study	New Zealand	Examine attitudes toward a new collaborative pharmacy-based model of care for the management of warfarin treatment	The model of care was highly valued by patients and supported by primary care practitioners
Stuurman-Bieze et al45 Study type: pre/post-intervention Scope of practice: training specifically for study	The Netherlands	Determine the effects of a pharmacists’ intervention on the 1-year discontinuation and adherence rates of osteoporosis medication	Program significantly decreased the number of patients discontinuing osteoporosis medication
Stuurman-Bieze et al46 Study type: prospective intervention Scope of practice: training specifically for study	The Netherlands	Assess the effect of a proactive care intervention program and patients’ satisfaction	Patient satisfaction was very high. Pharmacists can contribute to optimal use of chronic medications
Billups et al44 Study type: quasi-experimental Scope of practice: training specifically for study	USA	Compare completeness of medication and blood pressure monitoring for patients requesting medication refills through multiple services	Pharmacists managing chronic medications resulted in more complete medication monitoring compared to others
Beaucage et al47 Study type: randomized controlled trial Scope of practice: standard practice	Canada	Study the impact of a pharmacist’s telephone follow-up intervention on clinical outcomes, pharmaceutical care, and costs for patients undergoing antibiotic treatment	A telephone follow-up is simple and quick, but it did not improve the number of infectious symptoms or the infection severity score

Types of services

The majority (56%) of studies identified for review inclusion examined a pharmacy service that was defined as a standard practice. Only six of these studies were completed in the United States, while the remainder were completed in countries with some type of national health care, such as Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada. As a trusted and accessible health care professional, the community pharmacist is often the first point of contact for patients, particularly for over-the-counter (OTC) products, and patients are generally satisfied with the pharmacist’s interaction.⁴ Patients also rely on pharmacists for medicine information when they cannot get all the information they need from their physicians, which allows pharmacists to have an impact on adherence.⁵ Patient satisfaction is generally high when patients are loyal to pharmacies where they have a good relationship with the staff and appreciate the overall atmosphere of the pharmacy.^6,7 Patients also reported greater pharmacy loyalty when the pharmacist had more relational skills rather than just technical knowledge.⁸ Patient loyalty and satisfaction was found even for patients who get prescriptions filled at a pharmacy that only offered standard brief medication counseling rather than advanced services, such as medication therapy management.⁹ Similar results were found when interviewing patients with chronic diseases specifically, and patients feel pharmacists do a good job addressing concerns related to epilepsy medications.^10,11 Pharmacists in Uganda providing intramuscular contraception were preferred over government providers due to reduced wait times, convenience, and respect they received from the pharmacists, and this reflects other studies that found similar reasons for a positive patient perception of the pharmacy experience, and subsequent patient satisfaction with the services.¹² While interpersonal interactions are a predictor of patient satisfaction with the pharmacy experience, patients also report that pharmacist’s counseling yields a good understanding of their medications, which may, in turn, improve satisfaction.¹³ Despite patients reporting they are satisfied with the information regarding complementary medicine, they also report low expectations of the pharmacist’s knowledge on complementary medicine.¹⁴ As patients experience a service, however, their expectations for the service increase, and the pharmacist may need to do more to produce patient satisfaction, as was seen when patients were interviewed about an asthma service and may be seen for other services as patients begin to recognize their knowledge limitations and what they need in a particular service.¹⁵ Conversely, patients are more satisfied with medication counseling more for OTC products and first-time prescription fills rather than refills.¹⁶ Patients are not always satisfied with the information they receive, however. Patients surveyed about the education they received regarding their cardiovascular medications and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors found that more than half were unsatisfied, and they felt they did not receive enough practical information.^17,18 They also reported a lack of empathy to be a barrier to improved communication, and potentially a limitation on patient satisfaction, with the pharmacist.¹⁸ A similar survey of mental health patients found that patients believe medication education is a more important role for pharmacists than providing medication recommendations, and they perceived the main value of community pharmacists is in their availability, reinforcing that patient satisfaction may be tied to a pharmacist’s accessibility.¹⁹

Patient satisfaction with the interaction and the knowledge provided by the pharmacist is important for pharmacy loyalty; however, satisfaction is not sufficient to produce positive health outcomes. Pharmacists are consistently able to identify medication-related problems and improve medication adherence, which can in turn improve patient outcomes.²⁰ When patients received diabetes-focused medication counseling, those patients who received a more intensive intervention had greater improvement, indicating the importance of pharmacist’s knowledge as a component of care.²¹ Similarly, German pharmacists who counseled patients specifically regarding their headaches produced an increase in mental health and self-efficacy over patients who received usual pharmacy counseling.²² When community pharmacists provided education to patients newly diagnosed with depression, patients reported a higher health-related quality of life but did not report a higher level of satisfaction compared to those who did not receive focused education, despite the improved quality of life.²³ Interventions involving OTC products and minor ailments can also show symptom relief and in the case of pharmacist prescribing for minor ailments, high patient satisfaction as well.^24,25 The same was also found for pharmacist’s counseling on lifestyle modifications and disease prevention; however, one study found that such counseling is rarely provided in rural community pharmacies.²⁶

Only 16 (32%) of studies included in the review looked at a newly developed in-person service offered in a community pharmacy. Approximately half of those studies that looked at a new in-person service were related to medication management, three of which were specific to diabetes. Pharmacists were able to improve patient knowledge about diabetes self-management and made multiple interventions per patient to assist patients in reaching their goals while maintaining a high level of patient satisfaction with the service.²⁷ Similarly, providing diabetic patients a financial incentive for maintaining behavior logs and receiving counseling from pharmacists regarding health behaviors had a high patient satisfaction and improved patient engagement in their care.²⁸ The DOTx. MED study furthered the concept of involving pharmacists in diabetes management conversations by including the pharmacist in dialog between the physician and patient to improve adherence to improve patient control of diabetes and satisfaction with diabetes care.²⁹ The other identified medication management-related studies focused on asthma. Two Australian studies examining patient-tailored interventions for asthma improved knowledge and led to a change in disease management, but unlike the diabetes services, the asthma study found that patient knowledge was maintained for at least a year after the intervention had ended, along with improved asthma outcomes and high patient satisfaction.^30,31 Community pharmacies in Australia may also provide opioid substitution therapy, and patients were highly satisfied with the service they received at the pharmacy.³² Beyond medication and disease state management, pharmacies provide vaccinations, including influenza. A study on the Isle of Wight found that pharmacists provided nearly 10% of influenza vaccinations administered on the island, and the majority of patients approved of the convenience and speed of service associated with receiving vaccinations at a community pharmacy rather than a physician’s office.³³

Other new services provided by community pharmacies included various types of screening/wellness counseling. Education is an important component of community pharmacist’s counseling and care, and some studies examined opportunities to expand education to topics not traditionally integrated in pharmaceutical care. One such study provided continuing education to pharmacists to provide care to those with migraines and recurrent headaches, which found overall there were positive patient perceptions of the pharmacists’ care management, even with a limited sample size.³⁴ Another two articles examined a program where pharmacists provided continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea.^35,36 While there was a pharmacist’s perception of providing a needed service to the community, patients reported that the information they received at diagnosis was not generally sufficient to meet their needs.^35,36 Wellness coaching and counseling provided by community pharmacists can produce significant improvements in cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood glucose measurements with a continuously high level of patient satisfaction.³⁷ Studies of cognitive screening services in community pharmacies have been well received by patients, as those the pharmacist identifies to be at risk could be referred to their physician for further follow-up earlier than they might otherwise be identified, and patients believed it was a good idea for pharmacies to offer memory screenings.^38,39 Expanding pharmacist services further under a collaborative practice agreement allowed pharmacists to screen patients and dispense prophylactic doxycycline, which resulted in no patients developing Lyme disease and patients being highly satisfied with the pharmacist’s interaction.⁴⁰ Pharmacist involvement in transitions of care is also occurring in community pharmacies as a way to improve care and reduce hospital readmissions, but the results have been mixed. One study found pharmacists providing medication reconciliation and counseling for polypharmacy patients upon hospital discharge as part of a multifaceted longitudinal intervention was found to reduce medication costs, but did not impact mortality, but patients who received medication counseling from community pharmacists were more satisfied with the counseling.⁴¹ However, another study of transition of care programs found a significant reduction in hospital readmissions by having pharmacists conduct medication reconciliation and patient education, but no difference in patient satisfaction between those who were seen by a pharmacist and those who were not.⁴²

The remaining six studies (12%) assessed a new technology-assisted pharmacy service. The application of technology to community pharmacy services was predominately limited to systems that facilitate standard pharmacy services, such as filling prescriptions, and as a means of monitoring/recording patient care information as part of a larger intervention.^43–47 A program that synchronized medications and provided automated calls to patients allowed patients to make fewer trips to the pharmacy and had high patient satisfaction while it also allowed pharmacy staff to reduce workload, but the study was limited.⁴³ A community pharmacy with access to a patient’s electronic medical record was able to evaluate laboratory measures and order tests if needed, ultimately reducing the number of medication refills requested that lacked necessary monitoring and improved patient satisfaction related to prescriptions being ready in a timely manner.⁴⁴ Similarly, two Dutch studies looked at adherence for various types of medications and utilized electronic health records to determine whether patients should be contacted about refilling their prescriptions, as part of a larger patient-centered intervention with patients being highly satisfied with the change and indicating that the pharmacy was the only place where they had received information related to medication effectiveness.^45,46 Taking patient care a step further, one study found that use of a phone call to follow up on antibiotic use is effective in identifying drug-related problems, but it was not found to improve symptoms patients experienced or patient satisfaction.⁴⁷ Another study examined the implementation of an anticoagulation service that incorporated clinical decision support in community pharmacies and found that patients preferred it for convenience and access, and physicians appreciated the time saved.⁴⁸

Opportunities for improvement

While many studies noted patients were satisfied with the services they received from a community pharmacy, the results were not universal, and there are opportunities for pharmacies to improve upon offered services or expand into new areas. Access is often cited as a reason for receiving or preferring services at a community pharmacy, but that could lead to increased workload for pharmacies.^33,48 While patients are generally happy with their pharmacists, there are differences in perceived access between urban and suburban areas, which pharmacists may be able to address through greater awareness of population differences.⁶

Services offered by a pharmacist often require additional pharmacist’s time or resources, and that should be considered in developing a new service. Training pharmacists to provide repeated review and education on diabetes self-management can have a noticeable improvement in achieving patient goals, but it requires pharmacist’s time and commitment.²⁷ Focused interventions that involved motivational interviewing can increase not only patient adherence but also the time pharmacists need to spend with individual patients.²⁹ However, there is an opportunity to potentially limit the intervention to a few visits over a period of several months and maintain lasting effects, but it has not been heavily explored.³⁰

In addition to the time requirement for pharmacy staff, some services may require additional financial resources, either as a way to incentivize patients or obtain the equipment and resources needed. Providing financial incentives serves to motivate patients, and that expenditure may ultimately be recovered through additional patient spending in the store where the pharmacy is located, but it has not been demonstrated.²⁸ Providing services with equipment, such as CPAP machines, can be expensive for pharmacies initially to obtain a stock of machines.³⁵ However, initial information on the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea may be lacking and provide an opportunity for pharmacists to give patients more education, even without providing the CPAP machines.³⁶

Pharmacists can play a significant role in reducing hospital readmissions, but it requires a well-established line of communication with physicians, which is often lacking in the community setting.⁴² Patients struggle to understand the role of medication counseling and find limited benefit for counseling on medication refills, which can limit the benefit pharmacists can provide to patients through repeated medication counseling.¹⁶ Conversely, pharmacists are effective at providing OTC counseling that leads to improved patient outcomes; however, patients may not want their physician to be made aware of their OTC use, and that can put the pharmacist in a difficult situation between the patient and the physician.^4,24 Collaborative practice agreements can improve access for patients in rural areas, but care must be taken to select programs, which will benefit a significant number of patients.⁴⁰

Patients who participate in a screening that finds they have some level of risk are more inclined to pay for the screening service in an accessible location, such as a community pharmacy, and use of memory screenings in the pharmacy that are easy and quick to use can be extremely useful for patients.^38,39 Similarly, new services may have limited adoption in community settings when the time required for training is large or has limited flexibility, such as training that must be completed at a different location.³⁴ Patients who experience a basic service are likely to be satisfied with the service, but patients who experience more specific or tailored service may have different perceptions of what constitutes quality pharmacy experiences and require more from their pharmacist to be satisfied with the encounter.⁹ Further, offering unique services may not be enough to draw new patients to a pharmacy, and pharmacists should work on developing strong relationships with patients in order to improve loyalty.⁷ A patient-centered approach can also improve retention of patients with chronic diseases.¹⁰ Patients may also benefit from better literacy-based communication techniques.³³ Tailoring information and counseling to fit patient needs may improve the experience further.^17,22

Improvements in laboratory measurements were are not always found to be related to improvements in quality of life, and that could also limit patient satisfaction.³⁷ While patients who receive an intensive intervention may have more improvement, there has not been a demonstrated reduction in hospital admissions or doctor visits, limiting the impact to the overall health care costs.²¹ Similarly, the positive impacts were limited for patients receiving antidepressant counseling, and there was no statistically significant improvement in clinical symptoms, despite patients reporting a higher quality of life.²³ There was also only a modest improvement in medication costs when pharmacists provided medication reconciliation and counseling post hospital discharge, and no associated improvement in mortality, but patients may still report high satisfaction with the service.⁴¹ Those starting a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor perceived a need for more tailored and actionable information regarding their medication use, and a lack of perceived empathy can limit the pharmacist–patient relationship.¹⁸ Mental health patients may also perceive a gap in care regarding how to stop a medication or the side effects or issues they experience as a result of taking a medication, and pharmacists are well placed to address that gap.¹⁹ Patients are not receiving focused education about their epilepsy from pharmacists but are open to pharmacists being involved in their care beyond medications.¹¹

Conversely, when pharmacists are able to provide medications for minor ailments, patients experience improvement at a lower cost, but most of the ailments studied were generally self-limiting, so the pharmacist’s impact may be overstated even though patients felt the pharmacist’s interaction was beneficial.^25,49 While pharmacists were effective at identifying medication-related problems in the primary care clinic, the interventions provided to improve adherence were patient education and counseling, which can be performed in the retail setting as well, perhaps with greater effect.²⁰ Patients may need more information in order to establish adherence, and pharmacists must be aware of specific patient needs to appropriately provide that information.⁵ A patient-centered approach to medication management services can improve patient satisfaction, but it can result in increased costs to the health care system.^50,51 Maintaining a high level of professionalism and service is important for patient perceptions of pharmacy services, but as their exposure increases, their expectations and preferences increase as well, meaning that services may not be one-size-fits-all over an extended period of time.¹⁵ Patients have a low expectation for a pharmacist’s ability to provide complementary medicine information, and it may be an area where pharmacists can improve patient satisfaction.¹⁴ Pharmacists can promote greater patient loyalty not only through professionalism but also through greater relational skills.⁸ In addition, patient groups, such as drug users, who experience a stigma from pharmacists are not as satisfied with their pharmacy services, but motivational interviewing may help overcome this stigma to improve patient perceptions of the pharmacist’s interaction.^32,52 Even without an intensive pharmacist’s intervention, patients may experience satisfaction with pharmacy services just by talking with pharmacists about their medications and disease states.³¹ Few patients receive health promotion information from pharmacists, particularly in rural settings, and providing additional education for pharmacists could lead to a benefit for their patients.²⁶ Pharmacies providing intramuscular contraception to patients generally provided injections to patients who were returning customers rather than new customers, indicating pharmacists may be better placed to maintain a patient base rather than expand, although pharmacies providing emergency contraception may gain new patients due to the ease of access compared to clinics.^12,53

Community pharmacies are beginning to utilize technology in the provision of care, but it is still limited. As the society becomes more reliant upon technology, pharmacies may need to embrace the innovations and use them to greater advantage in order to improve pharmacy services and potentially increase patient satisfaction. Effective incorporation of technology can be as simple as using a phone call to follow up with patients to build patient rapport and identify problems, but requires pharmacy time and has not been shown to improve patient symptoms.⁴⁷ Patients may feel that pharmacists are providing the services more for financial reasons rather than to improve patient care or be concerned about fragmented care when pharmacists provide more services, and that must be kept in mind when pharmacists consider new or changing services, particularly when technology is involved.⁴⁸

Conclusion

As the role of pharmacists as health care providers expands, community pharmacies are providing more services to patients. While patients are generally satisfied with the services they receive from community pharmacists, their expectations are sometimes low and increase as patient exposure to advanced services increased. Pharmacists can have a greater impact on patient satisfaction through greater interpersonal skills than through the provision of new services; however, patients may be expanding their perceptions of how community pharmacists can be involved in their care beyond medication dispensing and counseling.