Skip to main content
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2016 Oct 11;25(1):57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.10.002

Changes in carotenoid and chlorophyll content of black tomatoes (Lycopersicone sculentum L.) during storage at various temperatures

Me-Hea Park 1,, Peerapong Sangwanangkul 1, Dong-Ryeol Baek 1
PMCID: PMC5775087  PMID: 29379358

Abstract

Black tomatoes have a unique color and higher lycopene content than typical red tomatoes. Here, black tomatoes were investigated how maturation stage and storage temperature affected carotenoid and chlorophyll accumulation. Immature fruits were firmer than mature fruits, but failed to develop their distinctive color and contained less lycopene when stored at 8 °C. Hunter a* values of black tomatoes increased with storage temperature and duration; storage of immature fruits at high temperature favored lycopene accumulation. Chlorophyll levels of black tomatoes declined during storage, but differences between mature and immature tomatoes stored at 12 °C were minimal. β-Carotene levels of black tomatoes increased during early storage, but rapidly declined beginning 13 d post-harvest. The highest lycopene and chlorophyll levels were observed in mature black tomatoes stored at 12 °C for 13 d; these conditions also yielded the best quality fruit. Thus, the unique pigmentation properties of black tomatoes can be precisely controlled by standardizing storage conditions.

Keywords: Skin color, Lycopene, β-Carotene, Pigment, Maturity, Storage temperature

1. Introduction

Tomatoes are consumed globally as healthy fresh fruits and processed food. They play a key role in the human diet because of the high functionality of many of their constituent compounds. Tomato ranked first as the major source of lycopene followed by β-carotene and vitamins C and E (García-Closas et al., 2004). Carotenoids, which are plant pigments, act as antioxidants that prevent oxidative modification of human plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (Oshima et al., 1996). Lycopene is the most effective antioxidant for radical scavenging among the carotenoids (Mortensen and Skibsted, 1997). Lycopene and β-carotene are also major contributors to tomato fruit pigmentation, as they are responsible for the deep red and orange colors of the pericarp tissue, respectively (Tijsken and Evelo, 1994). The change in fruit color during tomato ripening is due to a transition from chloroplasts to chromoplasts, which is brought about by chlorophyll degradation and carotenoid synthesis (Liu et al., 2009). Lois et al. (2000) reported two enzymes are coordinated especially in controlling carotenoid synthesis during the ripening of tomato fruit. The D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase (DXS) which is responsible for chlorophyll synthesis in green tissue and carotenoid synthesis during early fruit ripening and phytoene synthase (PSY1), a fruit specific isoform, that regulates carotenogenes is showing an increase in gene expression level during fruit ripening.

Carotenoid synthesis, particularly lycopene accumulation, correlates with tomato fruit color (Cox et al., 2003) and is significantly affected by storage temperature. Chlorophyll levels are sensitive to low temperature and are thus used as a chilling injury index (Hershkovitz et al., 2005). Fruits stored at 8 °C fail to develop a robust red color (Gómez et al., 2009, Javanmardi and Kubota, 2006). By contrast, storage at 12 °C or 17 °C for up to 21 d engenders an optimal color in cherry tomatoes (Fuchs et al., 1995). The optimal ripening condition for the typical standard-size red tomatoes is slightly higher, and lies between 18 °C and 21 °C. Temperature below 5 °C and 10 °C for longer than 7 and 14 d, respectively, prevents ripening and full color development (Suslow and Cantwell, 2013). Changes in pigmentation during postharvest storage may affect the quality of the tomato fruit because its skin color is associated with ripening stage and a marketable flavor. However, the levels of lycopene, phenolic compounds (flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acids), and antioxidant activity are significantly influenced in a variety- and maturity stage-dependent manner (Martínez-Valverde et al., 2002). Generally, the recommended harvest time for typical red tomatoes is at the mature green, breaker or pink stages, as this favors a long shelf life and is associated with optimal fruit firmness. However, immature fruit does not fully develop its flavor during ripening (Wills and Ku, 2002). In contrast, harvesting at the colored stage in which lycopene content is high is associated with a flavorful fruit, albeit with a shorter shelf life.

The black tomatoes are reported to have a blackish red skin with higher lycopene content (185 mgkg−1) compared to both typical red tomatoes (Martínez-Valverde et al., 2002, Raffo et al., 2006, Seo et al., 2013). Unlike typical red tomatoes, the black tomatoes retain chlorophyll along with lycopene synthesis and develop a noticeable blackish-red skin (Ekelund and Jönsson, 2011). During ripening of the ‘Kumoto’ black tomatoes, reduced chlorophyll degradation results from a green-fresh (gf) mutation (Hu et al., 2011). However, the mechanisms of carotenoid synthesis and chlorophyll degradation during ripening under low temperature storage conditions remain unclear. Furthermore, the contribution of these bio-molecules to fruit quality and the storability of the black tomatoes are still unclear. In this study, therefore, black tomatoes were investigated the effects of storage temperature and storage time on the levels of carotenoid and chlorophyll accumulation in fruit harvested at different stages of maturity. Our results provide clear guidelines for the proper storage conditions required to provide high-quality black tomatoes for consumers.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant material and treatment condition

Black tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. ‘Hei’) were planted in a plastic house in Jeollanam-do, Damyang, South Korea. ‘Hei’ is a cultivar of red with black flesh; originated from the cross of two inbred lines, TUKI separated from ‘Kame’ and TLB separated from tomato collected in Europe. The fruit shape is round and fruit color is blackish red. Immature (40–50% maturity; dark green color) and mature (70% maturity; conventional harvest stage of blackish red color) fruits were harvested on July 10th, 2014 and stored separately at 8 °C, 12 °C or 20 °C for 20 d.

2.2. Quality evaluation

Weight loss was repeatedly measured in three replicates (tray). Each replicate contained 15 fruits. Skin color from two opposite of each fruit was measured using a color difference meter (Minolta CR-400 model, Osaka, Japan) and reported according to Hunter’s scale; L, a and b values and a ratio of a/b. The firmness of each peeled fruit sample was determined using a texture analyzer (TA Plus Lloyd Instruments Ltd., Fareham, Hamp shire, UK). Fifty fruits per replicate were penetrated at a speed of 2 mm·s−1 with a 5-mm diameter plunger head. Soluble solids content (SSC) was determined using a digital refractometer (PAL-1, Atago Co. Ltd., Japan) with juice samples. Titratable acidity (TA) was determined by titrating 5 ml of juice with 0.1 N NaOH using an auto-pH titrator (Titroline easy; SCHOTT instruments GmbH, Mainz, Germany) and expressed as citric acid content.

2.3. Respiration and ethylene production

Respiration and ethylene production were analyzed using a gas chromatograph (Bruker 450-GC model, USA) equipped with aflame ionization detector (FID) and thermal conductivity detector (TCD). Gas samples (1 mL) were withdrawn using a syringe from 2 h sealed 1Lcontainers containing 3fruits from each treatment. Respiration rate was determined based on carbon dioxide production level using a TCD. Ethylene production was measured using a FID with an active alumina column. An external standard of ethylene (10 μL L−1) was used for calibration. The injection and column temperatures were 110 °C and 70 °C, respectively. Both TCD and FID detectors used for CO2 and ethylene productions were set at 150 °C and 250 °C, respectively. High-grade helium was used as the carrier gas for ethylene and carbon dioxide detection at a flow rate of 0.5 mL s−1.

2.4. Chlorophyll analysis

The chlorophyll content was analyzed by modifying the AOAC method (AOAC, 1965, Kozukue and Friedman, 2003). Frozen tomato fruit pericarp sections (10 g) were homogenized by grinding with 10 mL of 80% acetone containing 0.1 g MgCO3 in a glass mortar. The mixture was homogenized in a 50 mL Falcon tube at 28,000g for 1 min, and then centrifuged at 18,100g for 10 min at 1 °C. The pellet was repeatedly extracted and centrifuged three times with 10 mL of 80% acetone and the supernatants were then combined. This solution was then analyzed using a UV spectrophotometer (EPOCH2 microplate reader, BioTek Instruments Inc., USA) at 665 nm and 642.5 nm for chlorophyll a and b, respectively.

2.5. Carotenoid analysis

Lycopene and β-carotene extraction and analyses were performed using modifications of previous methods (Fraser et al., 2000, Howe and Tanumihardjo, 2006). Freeze-dried powder of tomato fruit pericarp (0.4 g) was shaken with 5 mL of ethanol in a 50 mL Falcon tube for 5 min at 75 °C in a warm water bath. KOH (1.5 mL of an 80% solution) was added and the mixture was shaken again for another 10 min in the same warm water bath. The reaction was then stopped by shaking on ice for 5 min. Ultra-pure water and hexane (2 mL each) were added and vortexed. The solution was centrifuged at 1000g for 3 min at 4 °C. The hexane layer was collected and transferred into a flask. This process of adding ultra-pure water and hexane mixture followed by centrifugation was repeated twice (for a total of three replications). The combined hexane layer supernatants were concentrated in a pressure concentrator. The concentrated solution was adjusted to 1 mL (v/v) with a mixture of methanol:dichloromethane (50:50), then filtrated with a 0.20 μm PTFE hydrophilic syringe filter with a diameter of 13 mm and kept in a vial for UPLC analysis.

Lycopene and β-carotene was quantified using the ACQUITY UPLC (Waters, USA) instrument equipped with an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (130Å, 1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm; Waters, USA). The oven temperature was 30 °C. The mobile phases were methanol: water (75:25 v/v; solvent A) and ethyl acetate (solvent B) at a flow rate of 0.2 mLmin−1. Analytes were eluted using a gradient: initially 100% to 0% solvent A over 6 min, followed by 0% solvent A for a further 4 min, then 0% to 100% solvent B over 2 min and reduced to 0% solvent B over 3 min. Detection was performed at 475 nm for lycopene and 450 nm for β-carotene. The analyzed compounds were identified by comparing their elution times with those of authentic standards. The lycopene and β-carotene peaks were displayed on the HPLC chromatogram (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

HPLC chromatogram of black tomatoes lutein, lycopene, and β-carotene.

2.6. Statistical analysis

Values are the mean, plus or minus standard error. Samples were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significant differences were determined using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) in the SAS 9.2 statistical software package (SAS Institute, Cary, USA).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Quality changes of black tomato fruit harvested at different maturity stages and storage temperatures

The quality of black tomato fruits during the early period of storage at different temperatures was affected by the fruit maturity stage at harvest. Immature fruits at harvest were 4-fold firmer and had double the TA content of mature fruits; however, the SSC was similar in both cases. Immature black tomato fruits ripened normally during storage (Table 1), similar to observations from studies of the typical red tomato (Liu et al., 2009). In black tomatoes, the firmness of immature fruits continuously decreased during storage from 10.45N to 5.10N, which is indicative of a normal ripening process, although the values were slightly higher than those observed with mature fruit at the same time (4.50N) when stored at 8 °C and 12 °C. Weight loss of both immature and mature black tomato fruits gradually increased upon storage temperature, from 2.25% to 5.43% for an immature fruit, and from1.91% to 7.18% for a mature fruit at 20 d, respectively (Table 1). However, there was no significant difference in weight loss between immature and mature fruits when stored at 8 °C and 12 °C. The change in SSC during low-temperature storage was 4.32–5.28% and was not affected by maturation stage of the black tomatoes. SSC is reportedly even higher after removal from 12 °C storage and subsequent storage at 20 °C for 5 d (Lurie and Klein, 1992). Even though maturity at harvest affects fruit sweetness in many typical red tomatoes, our results indicate that the SSC of the black tomatoes harvested at both stages was not significantly different over 9–20 d of storage at 12 °C. In black tomatoes, immature fruit had twice the TA content of mature fruit, indicating higher acidity than mature fruits (Table 2). In contrast to the tradition of harvesting at the mature green stage for many other cultivars (Lurie and Klein, 1992, Thomson et al., 2000, Kozukue and Friedman, 2003), black tomatoes are best harvested at 70% maturity or the blackish-red stage to provide better fruit quality and storability.

Table 1.

Changes in firmness and weight loss of immature (dark green color) and mature (conventional harvest stage of blackish red color) black tomatoes during storage at various temperatures for 20 d.

Maturity Storage Storage period (days)
Stages Temp. 0 2 6 9 13 16 20
Firmness (N)
Immature 8 °C 10.45 ± 2.78Az 7.63 ± 2.51aA 4.29 ± 1.86cAB 7.53 ± 2.67aA 6.47 ± 2.45abA 4.91 ± 2.14bcA 5.43 ± 2.36bcA
12 °C 8.03 ± 2.07aA 5.41 ± 1.81bcA 6.49 ± 2.38abAB 4.75 ± 1.30bcBC 4.42 ± 1.68cA 5.10 ± 2.05bcA
20 °C 5.10 ± 1.24aB 3.43 ± 1.22bBC 3.06 ± 0.60bcD 3.11 ± 0.66bcD 2.37 ± 1.14cC 2.25 ± 0.89cB
Mature 8 °C 3.89 ± 0.78B 4.70 ± 1.37abB 3.53 ± 1.53bBC 4.53 ± 1.40abCD 4.42 ± 0.81abBC 4.28 ± 1.21abAB 4.85 ± 1.67aA
12 °C 4.71 ± 1.17abB 3.97 ± 1.50abBC 5.24 ± 1.37aBC 5.22 ± 1.82aAB 3.74 ± 1.38bABC 4.50 ± 1.12abA
20 °C 4.89 ± 1.18aB 2.82 ± 1.14bC 3.16 ± 0.73bD 3.54 ± 0.8bCD 2.84 ± 1.40bBC 2.80 ± 0.78bB



Weight loss (%)
Immature 8 °C 0.00 0.18 ± 0.09cA 0.36 ± 0.48cB 0.78 ± 0.53bcC 1.19 ± 0.38bC 1.53 ± 0.47abC 2.20 ± 0.40aB
12 °C 0.10 ± 0.05cA 0.77 ± 1.25bcB 1.57 ± 1.20abcBC 2.22 ± 1.20abBC 2.83 ± 1.14aC 3.54 ± 1.03aB
20 °C 0.14 ± 0.03fA 2.32 ± 0.90eA 3.97 ± 0.69dA 5.91 ± 0.39cA 7.31 ± 0.22bA 8.93 ± 0.08aA
Mature 8 °C 0.00 0.20 ± 0.06cA 0.45 ± 0.50bcB 0.76 ± 0.47abcC 1.18 ± 0.64abcC 1.45 ± 0.72abC 1.91 ± 0.89aB
12 °C 0.16 ± 0.06dA 0.83 ± 0.85cdB 1.43 ± 0.78bcdBC 2.12 ± 0.74abcBC 2.66 ± 0.78abC 3.32 ± 0.84aB
20 °C 0.10 ± 0.05dA 0.53 ± 0.38cdB 1.84 ± 0.66bcdB 3.55 ± 1.30bcB 5.08 ± 2.16abB 7.18 ± 3.40aA
z

Means with the same uppercase letter in the column or same lowercase letter in the row were not significantly different at P < 0.05 with Duncan’s multiple range test.

Table 2.

Changes in solid sugar content (SSC) and titratable acid (TA) of immature (dark green color) and mature (conventional harvest stage of blackish red color) black tomatoes during storage at various temperatures for 20 d.

Maturity Storage Storage period (days)
Stages Temp. 0 2 6 9 13 16 20
SSC (%)
Immature 8 °C 4.72abA 4.90aAB 4.90aA 4.76abA 4.76abA 4.38bAB
12 °C 5.28Az 5.02aA 5.02aA 4.88aA 4.74aA 4.70aA 4.70aA
20 °C 4.86aA 4.94aAB 4.88aA 4.50aAB 4.56aA 4.38bAB
Mature 8 °C 4.58aA 4.46aBC 4.24aBC 4.24aAB 4.30aA 4.58aAB
12 °C 4.94A 4.68aA 4.32aC 4.66aAB 4.56aAB 4.52aA 4.74aA
20 °C 4.74aA 4.52abBC 4.12cC 4.16bcB 4.38abcA 4.22bcB



TA
Immature 8 °C 0.69aA 0.54bA 0.46bB 0.43bB 0.41bA 0.43bA
12 °C 0.58A 0.56abAB 0.51abcA 0.69aA 0.54abA 0.41bcA 0.33cB
20 °C 0.47aBC 0.39bB 0.33bcBC 0.28cdC 0.24 dB 0.25cdC
Mature 8 °C 0.27aD 0.24aC 0.16bD 0.23aC 0.21abB 0.23aC
12 °C 0.25B 0.24aD 0.21aC 0.29aCD 0.26aC 0.23aB 0.22bB 0.28aC
20 °C 0.34aCD 0.21bC 0.20bCD 0.23bC 0.22bB 0.22bC
z

Means with the same uppercase letter in the column or same lowercase letter in the row were not significantly different at P < 0.05 with Duncan’s multiple range test.

In black tomatoes, mature fruit could be stored at 8 °C and 12 °C for up to 20 d without a loss of fruit firmness, and in the absence of changes to SSC and TA (Table 2). In contrast, mature fruit stored at 20 °C lost up to 7.18% water, which resulted in fruit softening, as fruit firmness decreased and reached its lowest levels by 20 d post-storage (Table 1). As indicated by CO2 production of black tomatoes, the respiration of mature fruit stored at 20 °C was higher than that of fruit stored at 12 °C and 8 °C, for all time points studied. Respiration of immature fruits was higher than that of mature fruit when compared at the same storage temperature. Together, these results indicate that immature black tomato fruit still contained the secondary metabolism required for energy.

Ethylene production in black tomatoes depends on storage temperature. Mature fruit stored at 20 °C reached a climacteric peak as early as 6 d of storage (3.6 μg kg−1 s−1), and the values then declined slightly but remained high (2.3 μg kg1 s−1) even after 16 d of storage (Fig. 2). Mature fruit stored at 8 °C and 12 °C produced the highest amount of ethylene during the first 2 d of storage, i.e., 2.8–3.1 μg kg−1 s−1, and the amount then gradually decreased before reaching the lowest point after 16 d of storage (0.6–0.9 μg kg1 s−1). The climacteric peak of ethylene evolution of this black tomato during storage at 12 °C was twofold lower than that reported for the ‘Rehovot 121’ tomato (Lurie and Klein, 1992). However, maximum ethylene production of black tomatoes occurred in immature fruit following 9 d of storage at 20 °C. Because ripening of green tomatoes is accelerated by exposure to ethylene (Lurie and Klein, 1992), these data indicate that 9 d is the time point at which ripening begins. In contrast to storage at 20 °C, immature fruit stored at 8 °C or 12 °C produced less ethylene during storage and was more delayed in ripening (Fig. 2), which indicates that immature black tomatoes require storage at 20 °C for optimal ripening, and also that delayed ripening maintains fruit firmness. The higher respiration and ethylene production of black tomatoes also affects weight loss, which is supported by the observation that maximum weight loss occurred at high storage temperature, and when respiration was high in both mature and immature black tomatoes. With regard to fruit quality of black tomatoes, storage of mature fruit at 8 °C and 12 °C appears to favor the emergence of the most desirable properties .The weight loss of black tomatoes stored at 8 °C was lower than that of fruits stored at 12 °C; however, this difference did not have statistical significance, and analysis of the SSC/TA ratio indicated that better flavor occurred with storage at 12 °C for 13 d.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Changes in the respiration and ethylene production of black tomatoes during storage after harvest at immature (dark green color) and mature (conventional harvest stage of blackish red color) stages at different storage temperatures. -●; 8 °C, --▲; 12 °C, - · · -■; 20 °C (immature) and -○; 8 °C, --△; 12 °C, - · · -□; 20 °C (mature). Values represent the mean of 3 replicates, vertical bars represent standard error (n = 3). Data at day 0 represent the initial value recorded in black tomatoes before storage on the first day after harvest.

3.2. Skin color and pigment development during storage

In black tomatoes, immature fruits stored at 8 °C failed to ripen even after 20 d of storage. The red skin color of immature fruits, as estimated by Hunter’s a value, developed slowly during storage at 8 °C, whereas at 12 °C and 20 °C the color significantly increased, reaching a peak at 5.9 and 6.8 after 20 d storage, respectively. These findings are similar to those observed with mature fruits before storage. Together, these results indicate that immature fruits stored at 12 °C and 20 °C are unable to evolve a blackish red skin color of black tomatoes. By contrast, the skin color of mature fruits developed better than that of immature fruits during storage at all three temperatures. In contrast to their immature counterparts, the skin color of mature fruits stored at 12 °C and 20 °C was not significantly different (Table 3).

Table 3.

Fruit skin color of immature (dark green color) and mature (conventional harvest stage of blackish red color) black tomatoes during storage at various temperatures for 20 d.

Maturity Storage Storage period (days)
Stages Temp. 0 2 6 9 13 16 20
Hunter a value
Immature 8 °C −10.1eC −6.9dD −3.7cE −1.9bE −0.7abD 0.5aD
12 °C −11.6Bz −8.8eC −3.3dC 2.3bD 0.5cD 3.0bC 5.9aC
20 °C −9.1dC −2.9cC 3.3bCD 3.7bC 4.7abC 6.8aC
Mature 8 °C 3.9cB 3.9cB 4.2cC 5.9bcB 6.8bB 9.2aB
12 °C 6.7A 7.2cA 8.0cA 8.9bcB 10.5abA 10.5abA 12.5aA
20 °C 7.2bA 9.3bA 12.3aA 12.4aA 12.0aA 13.5aA



Hunter bvalue
Immature 8 °C 20.9aA 18.2bB 15.4cBC 17.6bC 17.0bB 17.9bB
12 °C 22.7A 19.5aBC 16.6bC 13.6dD 15.2cD 14.0dC 15.2cC
20 °C 21.0aA 17.8bB 14.6cCD 14.2cD 13.9cC 14.7cC
Mature 8 °C 19.7abAB 19.4abA 18.7bA 19.1abAB 18.6bA 20.4aA
12 °C 19.1B 17.2bcD 16.6cC 16.0cB 18.0bBC 17.0bcB 19.3aAB
20 °C 18.2aCD 18.6aAB 18.9aA 19.7aA 19.8aA 19.5aA



Hunter a/b value
Immature 8 °C −0.48eC −0.38dD −0.24cC −0.11bD −0.04abD 0.03aD
12 °C −0.5B −0.46eC −0.20dC 0.20bB 0.03cC 0.21bC 0.38aC
20 °C −0.44dC −0.16cC 0.24bB 0.26bB 0.33abBC 0.46aBC
Mature 8 °C 0.20cB 0.21cB 0.23cB 0.30bcB 0.36bB 0.46aB
12 °C 0.4A 0.42dA 0.48cdA 0.55bcA 0.58bcA 0.61bA 0.66aA
20 °C 0.40cA 0.50bA 0.65aA 0.63aA 0.60abA 0.68aA
z

Means with the same uppercase letter in the column or same lowercase letter in the row were not significantly different at P < 0.05 with Duncan’s multiple range test.

Hunter’s b value of immature fruits stored under all three temperature conditions decreased continuously during the first 9 d of storage, then remained constant. In contrast, the b values of mature fruits stored at 8 °C and 12 °C slightly decreased during the first 9 d of storage, then slightly increased again. The b values of fruits stored at 20 °C remained constant at all times (Table 3).

The Hunter’s a/b ratio (indicative of the red ripeness stage) of both immature and mature black tomatoes stored at all three temperatures continuously increased and reached a peak at 20 d of storage. This ratio indicated that immature fruit stored at 8 °C for 20 d (0.03) did not ripen normally. However, those stored at 12 °C or 20 °C for 20 d (0.38 and 0.46, respectively) developed a red color similar to those observed in mature fruits at harvest (0.40) and after storage at 8 °C for 20 d (0.46), respectively (Table 3). In contrast to typical red tomatoes (Brandt et al., 2006), which are associated with a/b ratios between 1.0 and 1.18, the highest a/b ratios of our mature black tomato fruits stored at 12°C or 20 °C for 20 d were between 0.66 and 0.68, respectively. These ratios were significantly higher than with mature fruit at 8 °C on the same day (0.46), probably because of incomplete chlorophyll degradation during ripening of black tomato fruits (Table 5).

Table 5.

Changes in total chlorophyll content (mg kg−1 fresh weight) of immature (dark green color) and mature (conventional harvest stage of blackish red color) black tomatoes during storage at various temperatures for 20 d.

Maturity Storage Storage period (days)
Stages Temp. 0 2 6 13 20
Immature 8 °C 123.7 ± 3.5aB 101.0 ± 2.8cAB 113.6 ± 7.7bA 98.6 ± 0.2cA
12 °C 203.5 ± 7.9Az 125.8 ± 1.3aB 93.8 ± 5.5abAB 70.2 ± 46.9bB 80.4 ± 6.0abB
20 °C 139.5 ± 5.4aA 94.6 ± 3.8bAB 91.1 ± 7.3bAB 68.9 ± 1.6cBC



Mature 8 °C 128.1 ± 1.6aAB 76.3 ± 30.7bB 84.1 ± 4.2bAB 76.0 ± 7.8bB
12 °C 147.5 ± 10.1B 127.3 ± 8.0aAB 112.4 ± 32.7aA 118.8 ± 2.5aA 84.8 ± 19.9bAB
20 °C 134.9 ± 8.4aAB 84.4 ± 11.3bB 68.5 ± 9.8bcB 52.3 ± 20.4cC
z

Means with the same uppercase letter in the column or same lowercase letter in the row were not significantly different at P < 0.05 with Duncan’s multiple range test.

3.3. Changes in the carotenoid and chlorophyll content of black tomatoes during storage

The levels of functional compounds including carotenoids (Table 4) and chlorophyll (Table 5) both at harvest and during storage are considered important indicators of the fruit quality and storability of black tomatoes. Because temperature also affects the levels of these compounds, a quantitative analysis of each compound was performed during storage of the black tomatoes.

Table 4.

Changes in lycopene and β-carotene content of immature (dark green color) and mature (conventional harvest stage of blackish red color) black tomatoes during storage at various temperatures for 20 d.

Maturity Storage Storage period (days)
Stages Temp. 0 2 6 13 20
Lycopene (mgkg−1 dry weight)
Immature 8 °C 85.3 ± 0.0aD 86.2 ± 0.0aC 89.9 ± 8.2aD 80.1 ± 14.1aC
12 °C 50.5 ± 0.1Bz 93.8 ± 0.0bC 100.8 ± 6.8abC 109.0 ± 15.7aD 90.5 ± 9.9bC
20 °C 83.5 ± 3.5bD 97.9 ± 15.7bC 131.1 ± 14.2aC 125.4 ± 9.1aA
Mature 8 °C 105.6 ± 2.0 dB 131.7 ± 0.0bB 159.6 ± 16.9aB 118.1 ± 1.6cAB
12 °C 105.5 ± 0.0A 129.2 ± 1.5cA 157.0 ± 4.1bA 192.6 ± 20.2aA 107.1 ± 9.0cB
20 °C 106.9 ± 0.0 dB 138.5 ± 8.7bAB 161.3 ± 9.2aB 125.6 ± 3.4cA



β-carotene (mgkg−1dry weight)
Immature 8 °C 139.7 ± 4.1bAB 166.6 ± 6.1aA 108.8 ± 10.8cBC 31.8 ± 4.6dA
12 °C 43.6 ± 5.7A 133.5 ± 5.9bBC 183.4 ± 6.6aA 120.9 ± 26.0bB 27.5 ± 2.9cAB
20 °C 104.4 ± 26.6bD 170.0 ± 24.8aA 127.5 ± 38.5bB 26.1 ± 5.2cB
Mature 8 °C 118.8 ± 1.9bCD 167.1 ± 17.1aA 84.5 ± 4.2cCD 17.3 ± 2.9dC
12 °C 56.4 ± 8.6A 157.7 ± 5.0cA 188.7 ± 8.3aA 164.3 ± 5.3bA 17.7 ± 0.5dC
20 °C 132.7 ± 20.9bBC 161.3 ± 33.6aA 80.2 ± 0.3cD 15.0 ± 1.2dC



Lycopene/ Total carotenoids ratio
Immature 8 °C 0.38 0.34 0.45 0.72
12 °C 0.54 0.41 0.35 0.47 0.77
20 °C 0.44 0.37 0.51 0.83
Mature 8 °C 0.47 0.44 0.65 0.87
12 °C 0.65 0.45 0.45 0.54 0.86
20 °C 0.45 0.46 0.67 0.89
z

Means with the same uppercase letter in the column or same lowercase letter in the row were not significantly different at P < 0.05 with Duncan’s multiple range test.

3.4. Lycopene and β-carotene

Our HPLC analysis indicated that mature fruit at harvest contained double the amount of lycopene compared to immature fruits. This is consistent with reports that tomato lycopene content depends on maturity and ripeness at harvest (Kozukue and Friedman, 2003, Lurie and Klein, 1992). The lycopene content of both immature (50.5 mg kg−1d.w.) and mature black tomatoes (105.5 mg kg−1d.w.) at harvest was 2- and 4-fold higher than that found in mature green ‘Red Ruby’ tomatoes (Liu et al., 2009). In typical red tomatoes, lycopene accumulation is inhibited following storage at 12 °C for 7 d followed by 5 °C for another 7 d (Javanmardi and Kubota, 2006); it can also be accelerated between 4 and 21 d of storage (Alba et al., 2000, Liu et al., 2009). By contrast, the lycopene content of both immature and mature black tomatoes our current study increased suddenly after initiation of storage in all conditions, and reached a peak at 13 d post-storage before declining. The lycopene content of both immature and mature black tomatoes stored at 20 °C for 20 d was not significantly different because after 13 d, the mature fruit was over ripened thus lycopene levels had begun to decline. However, immature fruit stored at 20 °C was continually undergoing the ripening process, which was accompanied by gradual increases in lycopene levels of black tomatoes. These results agree with those of Choi et al. (2010), who showed that lycopene content decreased significantly in over-ripe tomatoes. The maximum amount of lycopene of black tomatoes was found in mature fruit stored at 12 °C for 13 d (192.6 mg kg−1d.w.) (Table 4), and was half the amount that was found in typical red tomatoes stored at 12–14 °C for 15 d [85 mgkg−1d.w.] (Gómez et al., 2009). Synthesis of carotenoids, particularly lycopene in the typical red tomato is also affected by cold stress, especially at chilling temperature (Gómez et al., 2009, Javanmardi and Kubota, 2006).

The β-carotene content of mature fruits at harvest was 12.8 mg kg−1 higher than that of immature fruit in black tomatoes; however, this difference was not statistically significant. The β-carotene content in both stages with storage under all conditions increased and reached a peak at 6 d of storage before decreasing dramatically, reaching a nadir after 20 d of storage (Table 4). The extreme loss of β-carotene at 20 d of storage indicated an inappropriately long storage time. The maximum amount of β-carotene was found in both immature and mature black tomatoes stored at 12 °C for 6 d (183.4 and 188.7 mg kg−1d.w., respectively) or one week before the peak of lycopene (Table 4). The β-carotene content of mature fruits remained high even after storage at 12 °C for 13 d, at which time the maximum content of lycopene was also observed. This means that 12 °C for 13 d is the optimum storage temperature and duration to obtain black tomatoes of high quality. However, the rate of β-carotene accumulation was the highest in the early stage of ripening (between mature green to yellow) and then decreased in orange and red ripe tomatoes, in contrast to lycopene accumulation, which continuously increased until the late stages of ripening (Riggi et al., 2008). In our experiment, the highest lycopene accumulation of black tomatoes, which occurred 1 week after β-carotene accumulation, probably resulted from attenuated conversion of lycopene to β-carotene. Thus, β-carotene synthesis was partially blocked or reversed in low-temperature storage, leading to lycopene accumulation. The precipitous drop in β-carotene levels at 20 d post-storage occurred at all temperatures. β-carotene was possibly converted or isomerized into other derivative compounds including flavor and aroma constituents (Lewinsohn et al., 2005), or it was converted back into lycopene (Alba et al., 2000). In the mevalonate-independent pathway (Rohmer pathway) located in the plastids, plastid isoprenoids including plant growth hormones [gibberellins, abscisic acid, and plant pigments (carotenoids and chlorophyll)] are derived from isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) (Lois et al., 2000). In addition, a previous report showed that the accumulation of lycopene in tomato fruits is favored at 20 °C, as the conversion of mevalonic acid into phytoene and lycopene was highest, whereas the conversion of lycopene to β-carotene was relatively slow. We found that β-carotene of black tomatoes was reversely convertible to lycopene, even at lower temperatures of 8 °C, 12 °C. Based on our findings, the dramatic loss of β-carotene followed by accumulation of lycopene clearly indicates that lycopene accumulation in black tomatoes is affected by storage temperature and maturation. Moreover, the loss of both lycopene and β-carotene after 20 d of storage suggests the conversion of this compound into other derivative compounds (Lewinsohn et al., 2005, Lois et al., 2000). Storage at 12 °C for 6–13 d is optimal for the production of β-carotene and lycopene in mature black tomatoes. In addition to the enhanced accumulation of lycopene with storage at 12 °C, heat treatment before storage also enhances lycopene content in tomatoes (Lurie and Klein, 1992). In contrast, the extreme loss of β-carotene and sustainable lycopene in mature black tomatoes resulted in little change in the lycopene/total carotenoid ratio, which was different from the case in typical red tomatoes. Typical red tomatoes showed a large change in lycopene and a minor change in carotenoid during maturation, resulting in a dramatic increase in the lycopene/total carotenoid ratio from the mature green stage to the red stage.

3.5. Chlorophyll

Table 5 shows the changes in the chlorophyll content of black tomatoes stored at different temperatures. In our experiment, the chlorophyll content of both immature and mature black tomatoes tended to decrease for 20 d under all storage conditions. This degradation was obvious at the higher temperature, 20 °C. Chlorophyll is obviously degraded enzymatically during tomato ripening, which is accompanied by a corresponding loss of the green color of the typical red tomato. In black tomatoes, the chlorophyll content of mature fruit stored at 12 °C for 20 d still remained as high as that of immature fruit stored at 20 °C and 12 °C, resulting in a slight greenish color skin color being retained in the mature fruit, even though the fruit appeared blackish red. However, the incomplete chlorophyll degradation in mature black tomatoes stored at 12 °C for 13 d helped to maintain the dark red skin color with high contents of both carotenoids and chlorophylls. At the end of storage at 8 °C in black tomatoes, immature fruits showed still higher chlorophyll content than mature fruits stored at all temperatures. Immature fruits stored at 8 °C failed to ripen because of the failure of complete chlorophyll degradation. The loss of chlorophyll during storage occurred either through degradation during ripening or an increase in the conversion of mevalonate-derived IPP into more carotenoids, as both chlorophylls and carotenoids share the same precursor (Grierson, 1985, Lois et al., 2000). It is possible that low temperature affects the pathways that convert chlorophyll, such as the β-carotene synthesis pathway. Yahia et al. (2007) demonstrated that chlorophyll was degraded completely in tomatoes stored at 20 °C, whereas degradation was delayed in fruits stored at 4 °C.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, the levels of carotenoids and chlorophyll, which are functionally important compounds and pigments in black tomatoes, are dependent on storage temperature. In black tomatoes, lycopene (a red pigment) accumulated rapidly in immature fruit stored at high temperature; this correlated with an increased Hunter index and was dependent on storage temperature and duration. Synthesis of β-carotene (a yellow pigment) was partially blocked or reversed upon storage at low temperature; this coincided with lycopene accumulation. Immature black tomato fruits failed to undergo further pigment changes during cold storage, especially at 8 °C, as the green chlorophyll pigment was not degraded. Mature black tomato fruits stored at 12 °C required 13 d of storage to obtain the optimal levels of lycopene, β-carotene and chlorophyll; these conditions also favored the best quality content and longest storability period. Thus, the levels of these pigment compounds could be suitable markers of black tomatoes quality and storability.

Acknowledgement

This project was funded by cooperative research program for agriculture science and technology (Project No. 01135601), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. Alba R., Cordonnier-Pratt C., Pratt L.H. Fruit-localized phytochromes regulate lycopene accumulation independently of ethylene production in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2000;12:363–370. doi: 10.1104/pp.123.1.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. AOAC . Association of Official Analytical Chemists; Washington, DC: 1965. Methods of Analysis; pp. 55–56. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brandt S., Pek Z., Barna E., Lugasi A., Helyes L. Lycopene content and colour of ripening tomatoes as affected by environmental conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006;86:568–572. [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi S.H., Lee S.H., Kim H.J., Lee I.S., Kozukue N., Levin C.E. Changes in free amino acid, phenolic, chlorophyll, carotenoid, and glycoalkaloid contents in tomatoes during 11 stages of growth and inhibition of cervical and lung human cancer cells by green tomato extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:7547–7556. doi: 10.1021/jf100162j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cox S.E., Stushnoff C., Sampson D.A. Relationship of fruit color and light exposure to lycopene content and antioxidant properties of tomato. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 2003;83:913–919. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ekelund L., Jönsson H. How does modernity Taste? Tomato in the societal change from modernity to late modernity. Cult. Unbound. 2011;3:439–454. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fraser P.D., Pinto M.E.S., Holloway D.E., Bramley P.M. Application of high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection to the metabolic profiling of plant isoprenoids. Plant J. 2000;24:551–558. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00896.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fuchs Y., Weksler A., Rot I., Pesis E., Fallik E. Keeping quality of cherry tomatoes, designated for export. Acta Hortic. 1995;398:257–264. [Google Scholar]
  9. García-Closas Berenguer.R., Tormo A., Sanchez M.J., Quiros J.R.M.J. Dietary sources of vitamin C, vitamin E and specific carotenoids in Spain. Br. J. Nutr. 2004;91:1005–1011. doi: 10.1079/bjn20041130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gómez P., Ferrer M.A., Fernández-Trujillo J.P., Calderón A., Artéz F., Egea-Cortines M., Weiss J. Structural changes, chemical composition and antioxidant activity of cherry tomato fruits (cv. Micro-Tom) stored under optimal and chilling conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009;89:1543–1551. [Google Scholar]
  11. Grierson D. Gene expression in ripening tomato fruit. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1985;3:113–132. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hershkovitz V., Saguy S.I., Pesis E. Postharvest application of 1-MCP to improve the quality of various avocado cultivars. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2005;37:252–264. [Google Scholar]
  13. Howe J.A., Tanumihardjo S.A. Evaluation of analytical method for carotenoid extraction from biofortified maize (Zea mays sp.) J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006;54:7992–7997. doi: 10.1021/jf062256f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hu Z.L., Deng L., Yan B., Pan Y., Luo M., Chen X.Q. Silencing of the LeSGR1 gene in tomato inhibits chlorophyll degradation and exhibits a stay-green phenotype. Biol. Plant. 2011;55:27–34. [Google Scholar]
  15. Javanmardi J., Kubota C. Variation of lycopene, antioxidant activity, total soluble solids and weight loss of tomato during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2006;41:151–155. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kozukue N., Friedman M. Tomatine, chlorophyll, β -carotene and lycopene content in tomatoes during growth and maturation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2003;83:195–200. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lewinsohn E., Sitrit Y., Bar E., Azulay Y., Ibdah M., Meir A., Yosef E., Zamir D., Tadmor Y. Not just colors-carotenoid degradation as a link between pigmentation and aroma in tomato and watermelon fruit. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005;16(9):407–415. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu L.H., Zabaras D., Bennett L.E., Aguas P., Woonton B.W. Effect of UV-C, red light and sun light on the carotenoid content and physical qualities of tomatoes during post-harvest storage. Food Chem. 2009;115:495–500. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lois L.M., Rodriguez-Concepcion M., Gallego F., Campos N., Boronat A. Carotenoid biosynthesis during tomato fruit development: regulatory role of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase. Plant J. 2000;22(6):503–513. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00764.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lurie S., Klein J.D. Ripening characteristics of tomatoes stored at 12 °C and2 °C following a prestorage heat treatment. Sci. Hortic. 1992;51:55–64. [Google Scholar]
  21. Martínez-Valverde I., Periago M.J., Provan G., Chesson A. Phenolic compounds, lycopene and antioxidant activity in commercial varieties of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) J. Sci. Food Agri. 2002;82(3):323–330. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mortensen A., Skibsted L.H. Importance of carotenoids structure in radical scavenging reactions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997;45:2970–2977. [Google Scholar]
  23. Oshima S., Ojima F., Sakamoto H., Ishigura Y., Terao J. Supplementation with carotenoids inhibits singlet oxygen-mediated oxidation of human plasma low-density lipoprotein. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996;44:2306–2309. [Google Scholar]
  24. Raffo A., Malfa G.L., Fogliano V., Maiani G., Quaglia G. Seasonal variations in antioxidant components of cherry tomatoes (Lycopersicone sculentum cv. Naomi F1) J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006;19:11–19. [Google Scholar]
  25. Riggi E., Patane C., Ruberto G. Content of carotenoids at different ripening stages in processing tomato in relation to soil water availability. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2008;59:348–353. [Google Scholar]
  26. Seo J.B., Shin G.H., Jang M.H., Lee Y.S., Jung H.J., Yoon B.K., Choi K.J. Breeding of black tomatoes ‘Hei’ for protected cultivation. Korean J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2013;31(6):833–836. [Google Scholar]
  27. Suslow T.V., Cantwell M. Department of Plant Science, University of California; Davis: 2013. Tomato: Recommendations for Maintaining Postharvest Quality. http://http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/pfvegetable/Tomato/ [Google Scholar]
  28. Thomson K.A., Marshall M.R., Sims C.A., Wei C.I., Sargent S.A., Scott J.W. Cultivar, maturity, and heat treatment on lycopene content in tomatoes. J. Food Sci. 2000;65(5):791–795. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tijsken L.M., Evelo R.W. Modeling colour of tomatoes during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1994;4:85–89. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wills R.B.H., Ku V.V.V. Use of 1-MCP to extend the time to ripen of green tomatoes and post harvest life of ripe tomatoes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2002;26:85–90. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yahia E.M., Soto-Zamora G., Brecht J.K., Gardea A. Postharvest hot air treatment effects on the antioxidant system in stored mature-green tomatoes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2007;44:107–115. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES