Abstract
Background
Genome-wide association studies have recently identified over 400 loci that harbor DNA sequence variants that influence blood pressure (BP). Our earlier work identified and validated 56 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) associated with BP from meta-analyses of Exome Chip genotype data. An additional 100 variants yielded suggestive evidence of association.
Methods and Results
Here, we augment the sample with 140,886 European individuals from the UK Biobank, in whom 77 of the 100 suggestive SNVs were available for association analysis with systolic or diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) or pulse pressure (PP). We performed two meta-analyses, one in individuals of European, South Asian, African and Hispanic descent (pan-ancestry, ~475,000), and the other in the subset of individuals of European descent (~423,000). Twenty-one SNVs were genome-wide significant (P < 5×10−8) for BP, of which four are new BP loci: rs9678851 (missense, SLC4A1AP), rs7437940 (AFAP1), rs13303 (missense, STAB1) and rs1055144 (7p15.2). In addition, we identified a potentially independent novel BP-associated SNV (rs3416322 (missense, SYNPO2L) at a known locus, uncorrelated with the previously reported SNVs. Two SNVs are associated with expression levels of nearby genes, and SNVs at three loci are associated with other traits. One SNV with a minor allele frequency < 0.01, (rs3025380 at DBH) was genome-wide significant.
Conclusions
We report four novel loci associated with BP regulation, and one independent variant at an established BP locus. This analysis highlights several candidate genes with variation that alter protein function or gene expression for potential follow-up.
Keywords: blood pressure, genetic association, genetics, human, genetics, association studies, gene expression, UK Biobank, exome chip
High blood pressure (BP) is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, renal failure and premature mortality1. High BP has been estimated to cause 10.7 million deaths worldwide in 20152, 3. Pharmacologic interventional trials of BP-lowering therapies in patients with hypertension have demonstrated reductions in cardiovascular complications, including mortality4. While several anti-hypertensive drug classes exist, variability in treatment response by individual patients and ethnic/racial groups, and residual risks, suggest that identification of previously unrecognized BP regulatory pathways could identify novel targets and pave the way for new treatments for cardiovascular disease prevention.
Genetic association studies have identified over 400 loci at P < 5×10−8 that influence BP5–11. Two recent reports independently performed discovery analyses, in sample sizes of up to ~146k (CHARGE Exome BP consortium) and ~192k individuals (the European-led Exome consortia [contributory consortia, CHD Exome+, ExomeBP, and GoT2D:T2DGenes])8, 9. All samples were genotyped on the Illumina Exome array that was designed to interrogate rare and low frequency non-synonymous and other putative functional variants, as well as non-coding variants for association with biomedical traits. They each identified ~80 promising single nucleotide variant (SNV) associations with systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure (PP) or hypertension and took them forward for replication in the reciprocal consortium8, 9 resulting in the identification of 56 novel BP-associated loci across the two reports, including associations with coding and rare SNVs. A total of 100 SNVs remained of interest, but did not achieve genome-wide significance. Increasing the sample size, is likely to identify additional BP-associated SNVs among these variants.
In the current report, we augmented the sample size of these studies with up to 140,886 European individuals from the UK Biobank, and analyzed 77 SNVs available in the UK Biobank for association with SBP, DBP and PP, in a total sample size of up to ~475,000 individuals (up to ~423,000 EUR).
Materials and Methods
Samples
These analyses consisted of a meta-analysis of results from three independent publications, the CHARGE Exome BP consortium8, European-led Exome consortia (contributory consortia, CHD Exome+, ExomeBP, and GoT2D:T2DGenes)9 and the BP analyses from the UK Biobank Cardiometabolic consortium11.
The CHARGE Exome BP consortium included 120,473 individuals of EUR descent from 15 cohorts, 21,503 individuals of African (AFR) descent from 10 cohorts and 4,586 individuals of Hispanic (HIS) ancestry from 2 cohorts as previously described8. The European-led consortia included 165,276 individuals of EUR descent from 51 cohorts and 27,487 individuals of South Asian (SAS) descent from two cohorts9. The UK Biobank data included 140,886 unrelated individuals of EUR descent11.
All samples from the CHARGE and European-led Exome consortia were genotyped on Exome arrays that includes ~242,000 markers > 90% of which are non-synonymous or splice variants, with enrichment for variants with MAF < 0.05. The UK Biobank used the Affymetrix UK Biobank Axiom Array (N~100,00), or the Affymetrix UK BiLEVE Axiom Array (N~50,000) to genotype ~800,000 SNVs with subsequent imputation based on UK10K sequencing and 1000 Genomes reference panels. SNVs with an imputation threshold INFO score of < 0.10 were filtered by the Warren et al. UK Biobank Nature Genetics 2017 manuscript, from which the SNV association statistics for UK Biobank were provided11. Imputation scores in the UK Biobank samples for the variants presented in Table 1 had INFO > 0.6. SNVs that produced significant results are highlighted in green in Supplemental Tables 1 and 2, with a median INFO of 1. The studies by Surendran et al., Liu et al. and Warren et al. examined genomic inflation factors in the contributing studies and the combined meta-analyses for each of the traits analysed. Genomic inflation ranged between 1.04 and 1.11 in these contributing studies and therefore did not suggest there were significant issues with population stratification8, 9, 11. In the current analyses, 77 non-validated BP-associated SNVs were available for analysis across all three datasets.
Table 1.
rsID | Gene | Annotation | chr-pos | Trait | Meta | a1/2 | Freq1 | b(S.E.) | P-value | Dir | HetP | N | UK- BioBank INFO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New loci | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
rs9678851 | SLC4A1AP | missense | 2-27664167 | S | PA | a/c | 0.54 | −0.23 (0.04) | 1.07E-09 | −−− | 0.09 | 474,569 | 1.0000 |
rs13303* | STAB1 | missense | 3-52523992 | P | EUR | t/c | 0.44 | −0.15 (0.03) | 3.72E-08 | −−− | 0.11 | 418,405 | 1.0000 |
rs7437940 | AFAP1 | Intronic | 4-7885773 | P | EUR,PA | t/c | 0.47 | −0.15 (0.03) | 2.88E-08 | −−− | 0.007 | 420,616 | 0.9974 |
rs1055144 | 7p15.2 | nc-transcript | 7-25831489 | P | PA | a/g | 0.19 | 0.19 (0.03) | 3.47E-08 | +++ | 0.18 | 453,880 | 1.0000 |
Recently reported loci | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
rs786906 | PKN2 | synonymous | 1-88805891 | S,P | EUR,PA | t/c | 0.44 | 0.19(0.03) | 1.29E-12 | +++ | 0.08 | 422,556 | 1.0000 |
rs3772219 | ARHGEF3 | missense | 3-56737223 | S,D | EUR,PA | a/c | 0.68 | 0.25(0.04) | 2.00E-10 | +++ | 0.25 | 474,558 | 1.0000 |
rs40060 | ANKDD1B | 3'UTR | 5-75671561 | D | EUR,PA | t/c | 0.65 | −0.17(0.02) | 3.47E-12 | −−− | 0.46 | 422,598 | 0.9938 |
rs972283 | LOC105375508 | intronic | 7-130782095 | S,D | EUR,PA | a/g | 0.47 | −0.23(0.04) | 9.12E-10 | −−− | 0.1 | 474,569 | 1.0000 |
rs12680655 | ZFAT | intronic | 8-134625094 | S,D | EUR,PA | c/g | 0.6 | −0.29(0.04) | 1.62E-12 | −−− | 0.18 | 402,962 | 1.0000 |
rs10760260 | RABGAP1 | intronic | 9-122951247 | P | EUR,PA | t/g | 0.14 | −0.25(0.04) | 2.88E-10 | −−− | 0.12 | 421,223 | 0.9975 |
rs3025380 | DBH | missense | 9-133636634 | S,D | EUR,PA | c/g | 0.004 | −1.14(0.19) | 1.23E-09 | −−− | 0.05 | 400,891 | 0.8763 |
rs34163229* | SYNPO2L | missense | 10-73647154 | S,P | EUR,PA | t/g | 0.15 | 0.36(0.05) | 1.15E-11 | +++ | 0.32 | 448,759 | 1.0000 |
rs925946 | BDNF-AS | intronic | 11-27645655 | D | EUR,PA | t/g | 0.31 | −0.16(0.02) | 7.08E-12 | −−− | 0.25 | 474,564 | 1.0000 |
rs12286721 | AGBL2 | missense | 11-47679976 | S,D | EUR,PA | a/c | 0.56 | −0.17(0.02) | 3.39E-13 | −−− | 0.05 | 422,593 | 1.0000 |
rs10765211 | NOX4 | intronic | 11-89495257 | P | EUR,PA | a/g | 0.38 | −0.19(0.03) | 6.46E-12 | −−− | 0.05 | 474,550 | 0.9964 |
rs8258 | CEP164 | 3'UTR | 11-117412960 | P | EUR,PA | a/g | 0.37 | 0.22(0.03) | 1.95E-15 | +++ | 0.003 | 422,546 | 1.0000 |
rs11062385 | KDM5A | missense | 12-318409 | P | EUR | a/g | 0.73 | −0.17(0.03) | 2.69E-08 | −−− | 0.84 | 422,563 | 1.0000 |
rs7136889† | HOXC4 | intronic | 12-54043968 | S,P | EUR,PA | t/g | 0.69 | 0.36(0.05) | 1.58E-13 | +++ | 0.33 | 419,905 | 0.6070 |
rs2729835* | LACTB | missense | 15-63141567 | S | EUR | a/g | 0.68 | −0.24(0.04) | 1.29E-08 | −−− | 0.25 | 394,656 | 1.0000 |
rs2865531 | CFDP1 | intronic | 16-75356418 | S,P | EUR,PA | a/t | 0.6 | 0.42(0.06) | 2.14E-13 | +++ | 0.51 | 217,419 | 0.9998 |
rs4680 | COMT | missense | 22-19963748 | P | EUR,PA | a/g | 0.51 | 0.16(0.03) | 2.24E-09 | +++ | 0.005 | 418,385 | 1.0000 |
Note: rsID-SNV name, Gene-name of the closest gene or cytogenetic band based on Gene Entrez of NCBI; Annotation-SNV annotation based on dbSNP of NCBI; Chr-pos-chromosome-bp position in Human Genome build 38; Trait-the blood pressure trait (DBP, SBP or PP) the variant is associated with; Meta-the meta-analysis the variant is associated in, Pan-Ancestry and/or EURopean; A1/2-allele 1/allele 2; Freq1-allele frequency for allele 1; β (SE)-effect estimate, β and its standard error for allele 1 from the corresponding meta-analysis (highlighted in bold); P-value – P from meta-analysis (highlighted in bold); Direction-direction of effect in each of the contributing consortia in the following order: EUROPEAN led Exome Consortia, UK-BIOBANK and CHARGE-BP Consortium; HetP-P-value of heterogeneity across the three contributing consortia, N-Sample size for the trait and meta-analysis with the lowest P-value (bold).
indicates potential new signal at a recently reported locus (LD-r2 < 0.1 with a published BP SNV), and
indicates first report of this variant as genome-wide significant. For more details, see Supplemental Tables 1 and 2. UK-BIOBANK INFO-a quality of imputation score in UK BIOBANK.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained from each participating cohort and informed consent was obtained from all subjects8, 9. The UK Biobank study has approval from the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee and has Research Tissue Bank approval.
Phenotypes
Three BP traits were examined: systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and pulse pressure (PP), where PP was calculated as the difference between SBP and DBP. For individuals taking anti-hypertensive therapies, 15 mm Hg and 10 mm Hg were added to the observed SBP and DBP, respectively, to estimate the BP that would be observed off anti-hypertensive therapy12, 13. The traits were approximately normally distributed, and no transformations of the traits were performed.
Statistical analyses
In the CHARGE Exome BP consortium, in cohorts of unrelated individuals single SNV association tests were implemented via linear regression in R/PLINK/SNPTEST. For family-based cohorts linear mixed effects models in R was used to estimate kinship via R KINSHIP2 package and using the LMEKIN function, to account for familial correlations (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/coxme/vignettes/lmekin.pdf; Supplemental Table 21 of Liu et al.8). The component studies of the European-led consortia (CHD Exome+, ExomeBP and GoT2D:T2D genes) used linear regression as implemented in PLINK14 or linear mixed models as implemented in Genome-Wide Efficient Mixed Model Association (GEMMA)15 or EPACTS (the Efficient Mixed-Model Association eXpedited, EMMAX)16, to test variants for association with BP traits. The UK Biobank study used linear regression models as implemented in SNPTEST17. All studies assumed an additive allelic effects model.
All studies adjusted for age, age2, sex, body mass index and additional cohort- specific covariates including (where appropriate) principal components of genetic ancestry, field centers, genotyping array, or case/control status for samples ascertained on case/control status for a non-BP trait. Both study-level QC and central QC was performed prior to the meta-analyses being performed. Full details are given in the reports from the component consortia8, 9, 11.
At the consortium level, meta-analyses of cohort-level association results were performed independently within CHARGE-Exome and the European-led Exome consortia using invervse variance-weighted fixed effects meta-analysis. These meta-analyses results were combined with the UK Biobank association results using fixed effects inverse variance weighted meta-analysis as implemented in METAL18. Two meta-analyses were performed, one pan-ancestry (AA, EUR, HIS, SAS), and a second of EUR ancestry. Statistical significance was set at genome-wide significance, P < 5×10−8.
Functional annotation
Associated variants were annotated using HG38 dbSNP and Entrez Gene (NCBI). We interrogated publically available gene expression regulatory features from ENCODE and ROADMAP Epigenome projects using HaploReg19 and RegulomeDB20. eQTLs were assessed using data from GTEx21 GRASP22, Westra et al.23, Lappalainen et al.24 and STARNET25. In addition we used the FHS eQTL results from microarray-based gene and exon expression levels in whole blood from 5,257 individuals26. We queried whether any of the five BP-associated SNVs were eQTLs for genes in the five BP-associated regions, or whether they were in LD (r2 > 0.8) with any of the eQTLs for genes in these regions. Where putative eQTLs were identified, we verified the BP-associated SNVs were in LD (r2 > 0.8) with the top eQTL for that gene.
We interrogated publically available GWAS databases through PhenoScanner27, a curated database holding publicly available results from large-scale genome-wide association studies facilitating “phenome scans”. We report results for SNVs with P-value ≤ 5×10−8.
Capture HiC interactions were accessed from the Capture HiC Plotter (www.CHiCP.org). Javierre et al28 used an interaction confidence score derived using CHiCAGO software29. The interactions with a CHiCAGO score ≥ 5 in at least one cell type were considered as high-confidence interactions.
Results
Association results for the 77 SNVs with the three BP traits are shown in Supplemental Table 1 for the pan-ancestry (PA: European, South Asian, African and Hispanic descent) meta-analysis and in Supplemental Table 2 for the European (EUR) meta-analysis. Twenty-one of the 77 SNVs were associated with at least one BP trait with genome wide significance, P < 5×10−8 and concordant directions of effects across the results from all contributing datasets (Table 1). Sixteen SNVs (PKN2, ARHGEF3, AFAP1, ANKDD1B, LOC105375508, ZFAT, RABGAP1, DBH, SYNPO2L, BDNF-AS, AGBL2, NOX4, CEP164, HOXC4, CFDP1 and COMT) were genome-wide significant in both PA- and EUR samples. Two SNVs at SLC4A1AP and 7p15.2, respectively, were significant only in the PA sample; and three SNVs at STAB1/NT5DC2, KDM5A and LACTB only in the EUR sample. All the significant SNVs were common (minor allele frequencies ≥ 0.19), except the SNV at the DBH locus (PA, MAF = 0.0043). While this report was in preparation, 17 of these loci were published elsewhere7, 10, 11. Four loci remain novel: rs9678851 (SLC4A1AP, missense), rs7437940 (AFAP1, intron), rs13303 (STAB1, missense) and rs1055144 (7p15.2, non-coding transcript; Supplemental Figures 1a–d). The SLC4A1AP (rs9678851) was associated with SBP and AFAP1 (rs7437940) and 7p15.2 (rs1055144) were associated with PP. We also observed a potentially new independent BP association (r2 ~ 0.001 in 1000G EUR and PA samples) at a recently published locus rs34163229 (SYNPO2L, missense; Table 1; Supplemental Figure 1e). We used a conservative r2 < 0.1 threshold to minimize the possibility of an association due to corelation with a strongly associated established BP variant. Furthermore, conditional analyses within the ~140,000 UK Biobank participants with comprehensive genomic coverage suggested that the association with SBP of rs34163229 was independent of the established SNV, rs4746172. Regional association plots in UK Biobank are provided in Supplemental Figures 2a–e. Conditional analyses within the full dataset was not possible given the targeted nature of the Exome array which makes claims of independence provisional. Twenty-two of the 77 SNVs had minor allele frequency (MAF) ≤ 0.01, and one rs3025380, a missense variant in DBH was confirmed as a BP-associatd locus.
Three of the five newly discovered BP-associated SNVs are missense variants, mapping to SLC4A1AP, STAB1 and SYNPO2L (Table 1 and Supplemental Table 3). At SLC4A1AP, rs9678851 (C>A, Pro139Thr) has MAF=0.46 and the C allele is associated with an increase of 0.23 mmHg in SBP. This variant is correlated with two other missense variants in C2orf16 (rs1919126 and rs1919125, r2 = 0.81 (EUR) based on 1000G30, for both). At STAB1, the C allele of rs13303 (T>C, Met2506Thr, with MAF=0.44) is associated with an increase of 0.15 mmHg in PP per minor allele in EUR. This residue is located in a conserved region of the protein31 (Supplemental Table 4). The T allele of rs34163229, the new association at the SYNPO2L locus, (G>T, Ser833Tyr, with MAF=0.15), is associated with an increase of 0.36 mmHg in SBP per allele. This variant is in LD with another missense variant in SYNPO2L (rs3812629 r2=1, 1000G EUR)30. Using Polyphen2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/index.shtml), the SNVs rs9678851 in SLC4A1AP, and rs13303 in STAB1 were predicted to be benign, while rs34163229 in SYNPO2L was predicted to have a possible damaging impact on the corresponding human proteins’ structure and function.
We interrogated publicly available expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) datasets through GTEx, ENCODE, RoadMap projects, PhenoScanner27, STARNET25 and Framingham Heart Study26 to further highlight potential causal genes and mechanisms at each of the newly identified BP loci (Supplemental Table 3). The PP-associated SNV, rs13303, at STAB1 is correlated (r2 > 0.8 1000G EUR) with the top eQTLs for NT5DC2 in atherosclerotic-lesion free internal mammary artery, atherosclerotic aortic root, subcutaneous adipose, visceral abdominal fat and liver tissues (all P < 1×10−11)25. The rs13303 was also associated with expression levels of NT5DC2 in EBV-transformed lymphocytes, transformed fibroblasts25 and thyroid cells (Supplemental Table 3)21. The SBP-associated SNV at SYNPO2L (rs34163229) is correlated (r2=0.86 in 1000G EUR) with the top eQTL (rs2177843) for MYOZ1 in heart atrial appendage tissue (Supplemental Table 3)21. The five new BP associated SNVs were not in LD with the top eQTLs for these gene regions in whole blood in the Framingham Heart Study eQTL data. We also took the opportunity to assess whether the additional fifteen recently established genome-wide significant BP-associated SNVs were eQTLs in the Framingham sample. Amongst the genome-wide significant BP SNVs, three, rs4680 at COMT, rs12680655 at ZFAT and rs10760260 at RABGAP1, were the top eQTL for the corresponding genes in whole blood (Supplemental Table 5). We also examined the five BP-associated SNVs in endothelial precursor cell Hi-C data (www.chicp.org;28, 32) to explore long-range chromatin interactions. rs13303 was found to contact NISCH (score 17.34) and rs34163229 contacts USP54 (score 33.89)
Finally, we assessed the association of the new BP-associated variants and their close proxies (r2>0.8) with cardiovascular disease risk factors, molecular metabolic traits and clinical phenotypes using PhenoScanner, the NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog and GRASP27. We observed five of the newly discovered BP-associated SNVs to have genome wide significant associations with other traits, including height (7p15.2)33, waist-to-hip ratio (STAB1 and 7p15.2)34, 35, triglycerides (SLC4A1P), adiponectin levels (STAB1)36, and atrial fibrillation (rs7915134 which has r2=0.92 in the EUR 1000G samples with rs34163229 in SYNPO2L)37 (Supplemental Table 3).
Of the 77 analysed SNVs, from the original Exome array analyses, 56 SNVs were not genome-wide significant in the current analysis. With ~300 BP loci reported since the time of our analysis, we investigated whether any of the 56 SNVs that were not genome-wide significant in our meta-analysis have been reported as new BP-associated loci in any of the three recent publications7, 10, 11. Twelve SNVs in our dataset were located within 1 Mb of a recently reported BP locus : CACNA1S, TSC22D2, RPL26L1, EDN1, GPRC6A, ACHE, CAV1, NOX5, PGLYRP2, NAPB, EDEM2 and KCNB1; (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2), although none of the SNVs were in LD (r2 >0.1 in all 1000G populations) with the published variants at these loci.
Discussion
We identified genome-wide significant associations with BP for 21 additional SNVs from our original Exome array analyses8, 9 by including UK Biobank participants to augment our sample size to ~475,000 individuals. Four of the twenty-one BP-related loci we identified were novel, of which two were missense variants, and one was a putative new independent signal at an established locus and was a missense variant.
A missense SNV in SLC4A1AP (rs9678851) marks the PP-associated locus on chromosome 2. SLC4A1AP, encodes a solute carrier also known as kidney anion exchanger adapter protein, although it is widely expressed in most GTEx tissues.
At the new locus on chromosome 3 (rs13303), three potential candidate genes are highlighted: STAB1, NT5DC2 and NISCH. STAB1 encodes stabilin1, a protein known to endocytose low density lipoprotein cholesterol, gram-positive and -negative bacteria, and advanced glycosylation end products38, 39. The gene product is also referred to as CLEVER-1, a common lymphatic endothelial and vascular endothelial receptor-140, which is expressed in macrophages41. SNX17 interacts with STAB1 and is a trafficking adaptor of STAB1 in endothelial cells38, 42. The rs13303 is located 500bp downstream of NT5DC2. This additional gene is highlighted through the association of rs13303 with expression of NT5DC2 in multiple tissues (Supplemental Table 3). NT5DC2 encodes the 5'-nucleotidase domain containing 2 protein. The gene is widely expressed, with higher levels observed in the heart and coronary artery, although its function is unknown. Lastly, exploration of long-range chromatin interaction identified contact of the SNV region with the genetic sequence including the gene NISCH, which encodes the nonadrenergic imidazoline-1 receptor protein localized to the cytosol and anchored to the inner layer of the plasma membrane. This protein binds to the adapter insulin receptor substrate 4 (IRS4) to mediate translocation of alpha-5 integrin from the cell membrane to endosomes. In human cardiac tissue, this protein has been found to affect cell growth and death43.
The PP-associated variant, rs7437940 on chromosome 4 is intronic to AFAP1, and is located in promoter histone marks in right atrial tissue, based on regulatory chromatin states from DNAse and histone ChIP-Seq in Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium (identified with HaploReg, Supplemental Table 4)44. AFAP1 encodes actin filament associated protein 1. This protein is thought to have a role in the regulation of actin filament integrity, and formation and maintenance of the actin network45.
At the locus on chromosome 10 (rs34163229), two candidate genes were highlighted (SYNPO2L and MYOZ1). SYNPO2L encodes synaptopodin like 2, which is not well characterized, but may play a role in modulating actin-based shape. The lead SNV is also associated with expression levels of MYOZ1 in heart appendage tissues. MYOZ1 encodes myozenin 1, an alpha actinin and gamma filamin binding Z line protein predominantly expressed in skeletal muscle46.
At two loci (SLC4A1AP and SYNPO2L) we observed more than one missense variant in high LD (r2 > 0.8). Functional follow up of these variants may be challenging to disentangle the causal variants. At the SLC4A1AP locus, there are three misssense variants, none of which are predicted to be damaging. Two of these are in C2orf16, which is predicted to encode an uncharacterized protein. Current evidence is at the transcriptional level. Cellular assays comparing the function of SLC4A1AP with the missense variant may be developed or an animal model could be created and BP can be measured. In the first instance, a knockout model may be required, due to the predicted weak effects of the BP variants. At the SYNPO2L locus, the two missense variants are both in SYNPO2L, of which one is predicted damaging, cellular experiments testing functional effecs of this variant alone or part of a haplotype maybe a good starting point.
In conclusion, we identified four new loci and one potential new SNV in a known locus, that influence BP variation and highlight specific genes and pathways that could potentially facilitate an improved understanding of BP regulation, and identify novel therapeutic targets to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease.
Supplementary Material
Clinical Perspective.
We analyzed 77 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) that remained of interest, but did not achieve genome-wide significance with blood pressure (BP) traits from a prior analysis of Exome chip genotypes. A meta-analysis of results from the CHARGE Exome BP and European led consortia in combination with association results from UK Biobank samples (pan-ancestry sample of ~475,000 and European only sample of ~423,000) indicated 21 genome wide significant loci. Four of these are novel BP loci: rs9678851 (missense, SLC4A1AP), rs7437940 (AFAP1), rs13303 (missense, STAB1) and rs1055144 (7p15.2). We also identified a potentially independent novel BP-associated SNV, rs3416322 (missense, SYNPO2L) at a known locus. Two of the BP-associated SNVs influence expression levels of nearby genes. These new findings add to the growing number of BP loci and could potentially facilitate an improved understanding of BP regulation, and identify novel therapeutic targets to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease.
Acknowledgments
A detailed list of acknowledgments is presented in the Supplem, together with the full list of members of the contributing consortia.
DIC received funding for genotyping of the exome chip and collabortive scientific support from Amgen. MJC is Chief Scientist for Genomics England, a UK government company. EE is a scientific advisor for Precision Wellness, Cellink and Olink Proteomics for work unrelated to the present project. NP has received financial support from several pharmaceutical companies which manufacture either blood pressure lowering or lipid lowering agents, or both, and consultancy fees.BMP serves on the DSMB of a clinical trial funded by the manufacturer (Zoll LifeCor) and on the Steering Committee of the Yale Open Data Access project funded by Johnson & Johnson. PJS has received research awards from Pfizer Inc.
Footnotes
Disclosures: All other coauthors declare NONE.
References
- 1.Rapsomaniki E, Timmis A, George J, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Shah AD, Denaxas S, et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1.25 million people. Lancet. 2014;383:1899–911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60685-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Collaborators GBDRF. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1659–1724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rahman M, Pressel S, Davis BR, Nwachuku C, Wright JT, Jr, Whelton PK, et al. Renal outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a calcium channel blocker vs a diuretic: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:936–46. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.8.936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.International Consortium for Blood Pressure Genome-Wide Association S. Ehret GB, Munroe PB, Rice KM, Bochud M, Johnson AD, et al. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature. 2011;478:103–9. doi: 10.1038/nature10405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wain LV, Verwoert GC, O'Reilly PF, Shi G, Johnson T, Johnson AD, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies six new loci influencing pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1005–11. doi: 10.1038/ng.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ehret GB, Ferreira T, Chasman DI, Jackson AU, Schmidt EM, Johnson T, et al. The genetics of blood pressure regulation and its target organs from association studies in 342,415 individuals. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1171–84. doi: 10.1038/ng.3667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu C, Kraja AT, Smith JA, Brody JA, Franceschini N, Bis JC, et al. Meta-analysis identifies common and rare variants influencing blood pressure and overlapping with metabolic trait loci. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1162–70. doi: 10.1038/ng.3660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Surendran P, Drenos F, Young R, Warren H, Cook JP, Manning AK, et al. Trans-ancestry meta-analyses identify rare and common variants associated with blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1151–61. doi: 10.1038/ng.3654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hoffmann TJ, Ehret GB, Nandakumar P, Ranatunga D, Schaefer C, Kwok PY, et al. Genome-wide association analyses using electronic health records identify new loci influencing blood pressure variation. Nat Genet. 2017;49:54–64. doi: 10.1038/ng.3715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Warren HR, Evangelou E, Cabrera CP, Gao H, Ren M, Mifsud B, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies novel blood pressure loci and offers biological insights into cardiovascular risk. Nat Genet. 2017 doi: 10.1038/ng.3768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tobin MD, Sheehan NA, Scurrah KJ, Burton PR. Adjusting for treatment effects in studies of quantitative traits: antihypertensive therapy and systolic blood pressure. Stat Med. 2005;24:2911–35. doi: 10.1002/sim.2165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu J, Kraja AT, Oberman A, Lewis CE, Ellison RC, Arnett DK, et al. A summary of the effects of antihypertensive medications on measured blood pressure. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:935–42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. American journal of human genetics. 2007;81:559–75. doi: 10.1086/519795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou N, Wang L. Effective selection of informative SNPs and classification on the HapMap genotype data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:484. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kang HM, Sul JH, Service SK, Zaitlen NA, Kong SY, Freimer NB, et al. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010;42:348–54. doi: 10.1038/ng.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marchini J, Howie B, Myers S, McVean G, Donnelly P. A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes. Nat Genet. 2007;39:906–13. doi: 10.1038/ng2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Willer CJ, Li Y, Abecasis GR. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2190–1. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ward LD, Kellis M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic acids research. 2012;40:D930–4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Boyle AP, Hong EL, Hariharan M, Cheng Y, Schaub MA, Kasowski M, et al. Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res. 2012;22:1790–7. doi: 10.1101/gr.137323.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.GTEx Consortium. Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015;348:648–60. doi: 10.1126/science.1262110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Leslie R, O'Donnell CJ, Johnson AD. GRASP: analysis of genotype-phenotype results from 1390 genome-wide association studies and corresponding open access database. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:i185–94. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Westra HJ, Peters MJ, Esko T, Yaghootkar H, Schurmann C, Kettunen J, et al. Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1238–43. doi: 10.1038/ng.2756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lappalainen T, Sammeth M, Friedlander MR, t Hoen PA, Monlong J, Rivas MA, et al. Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans. Nature. 2013;501:506–11. doi: 10.1038/nature12531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Franzen O, Ermel R, Cohain A, Akers NK, Di Narzo A, Talukdar HA, et al. Cardiometabolic risk loci share downstream cis- and trans-gene regulation across tissues and diseases. Science. 2016;353:827–30. doi: 10.1126/science.aad6970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Joehanes R, Zhang X, Huan T, Yao C, Ying SX, Nguyen QT, et al. Integrated genome-wide analysis of expression quantitative trait loci aids interpretation of genomic association studies. Genome Biol. 2017;18:16. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1142-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Staley JR, Blackshaw J, Kamat MA, Ellis S, Surendran P, Sun BB, et al. PhenoScanner: a database of human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3207–3209. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Javierre BM, Burren OS, Wilder SP, Kreuzhuber R, Hill SM, Sewitz S, et al. Lineage-Specific Genome Architecture Links Enhancers and Non-coding Disease Variants to Target Gene Promoters. Cell. 2016;167:1369–1384. e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cairns J, Freire-Pritchett P, Wingett SW, Varnai C, Dimond A, Plagnol V, et al. CHiCAGO: robust detection of DNA looping interactions in Capture Hi-C data. Genome Biol. 2016;17:127. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0992-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Machiela MJ, Chanock SJ. LDlink: a web-based application for exploring population-specific haplotype structure and linking correlated alleles of possible functional variants. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3555–7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Garber M, Guttman M, Clamp M, Zody MC, Friedman N, Xie X. Identifying novel constrained elements by exploiting biased substitution patterns. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:i54–62. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schofield EC, Carver T, Achuthan P, Freire-Pritchett P, Spivakov M, Todd JA, et al. CHiCP: a web-based tool for the integrative and interactive visualization of promoter capture Hi-C datasets. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:2511–3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wood AR, Esko T, Yang J, Vedantam S, Pers TH, Gustafsson S, et al. Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1173–86. doi: 10.1038/ng.3097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shungin D, Winkler TW, Croteau-Chonka DC, Ferreira T, Locke AE, Magi R, et al. New genetic loci link adipose and insulin biology to body fat distribution. Nature. 2015;518:187–96. doi: 10.1038/nature14132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Heid IM, Jackson AU, Randall JC, Winkler TW, Qi L, Steinthorsdottir V, et al. Meta-analysis identifies 13 new loci associated with waist-hip ratio and reveals sexual dimorphism in the genetic basis of fat distribution. Nat Genet. 2010;42:949–60. doi: 10.1038/ng.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dastani Z, Hivert MF, Timpson N, Perry JR, Yuan X, Scott RA, et al. Novel loci for adiponectin levels and their influence on type 2 diabetes and metabolic traits: a multi-ethnic meta-analysis of 45,891 individuals. PLoS genetics. 2012;8:e1002607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Christophersen IE, Rienstra M, Roselli C, Yin X, Geelhoed B, Barnard J, et al. Large-scale analyses of common and rare variants identify 12 new loci associated with atrial fibrillation. Nat Genet. 2017;49:946–952. doi: 10.1038/ng.3843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kzhyshkowska J, Gratchev A, Goerdt S. Stabilin-1, a homeostatic scavenger receptor with multiple functions. J Cell Mol Med. 2006;10:635–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00425.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Adachi H, Tsujimoto M. FEEL-1, a novel scavenger receptor with in vitro bacteria-binding and angiogenesis-modulating activities. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:34264–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204277200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Irjala H, Elima K, Johansson EL, Merinen M, Kontula K, Alanen K, et al. The same endothelial receptor controls lymphocyte traffic both in vascular and lymphatic vessels. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33:815–24. doi: 10.1002/eji.200323859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kzhyshkowska J. Multifunctional receptor stabilin-1 in homeostasis and disease. Scientific World Journal. 2010;10:2039–53. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2010.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Adachi H, Tsujimoto M. Adaptor protein sorting nexin 17 interacts with the scavenger receptor FEEL-1/stabilin-1 and modulates its expression on the cell surface. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1803:553–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sano H, Liu SC, Lane WS, Piletz JE, Lienhard GE. Insulin receptor substrate 4 associates with the protein IRAS. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:19439–47. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111838200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ernst J, Kheradpour P, Mikkelsen TS, Shoresh N, Ward LD, Epstein CB, et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature. 2011;473:43–9. doi: 10.1038/nature09906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Xiao H, Han B, Lodyga M, Bai XH, Wang Y, Liu M. The actin-binding domain of actin filament-associated protein (AFAP) is involved in the regulation of cytoskeletal structure. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69:1137–51. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0812-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Takada F, Vander Woude DL, Tong HQ, Thompson TG, Watkins SC, Kunkel LM, et al. Myozenin: an alpha-actinin- and gamma-filamin-binding protein of skeletal muscle Z lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1595–600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.041609698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.