Abstract
Ocular imaging has been heavily incorporated into glaucoma management and provides important information that aids in the detection of disease progression. Longitudinal studies have shown that the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer is an important parameter for glaucoma progression detection, while other studies demonstrated that macular parameters, such as the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer and optic nerve head parameters are also useful for progression detection. The introduction of novel technologies with faster scan speeds, wider scanning fields, higher resolution, and improved tissue penetration has enabled the precise quantification of additional key ocular structures, such as the individual retinal layers, optic nerve head, choroid, and lamina cribrosa. Furthermore, extracting functional information from scans such as blood flow rate and oxygen consumption provides new perspectives on the disease and its progression. These novel methods promise improved detection of glaucoma progression and better insight into the mechanisms of progression that will lead to better targeted treatment options to prevent visual damage and blindness.
Glaucoma is a multi-factorial optic neuropathy characterized by structural damage of retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and their axons that is associated with vision loss and may lead to irreversible blindness (1). Because glaucomatous damage is irreversible and effective treatment is available to halt further damage, glaucoma management should be optimized with precise micron scale quantifications of ocular structures that improve detection of the disease and its progression (2–4). The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) technology over 20 years ago provided in vivo detailed visualization of the optic nerve head (ONH) and retina and enabled the quantitative evaluation of these structures (5) (6). Circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness is a common OCT measurement that provides comprehensive evaluation of all RGCs in an eye as they converge into the ONH (2). When measured with spectral-domain (SD-) OCT, the RNFL has been shown to differentiate between healthy and glaucomatous eyes (7). The steady evolution of OCT technology has led to imaging with better resolution, higher scanning speeds, and advanced imaging patterns that has improved the reliability of OCT measurements and allowed for detection of minute changes that can improve the sensitivity of progression detection.
Assessment of glaucoma progression is usually based on event or trend analysis. Event-based progression determines when a measurement exceeds a pre-established threshold for change from baseline. Trend-based analysis quantifies the rate of a parameter’s progression over time (2) (8). Conventionally, structural progression has been assessed using RNFL measurements; however, longitudinal studies have shown that other parameters including the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC), ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) and ONH parameters (rim area, cup area and cup-to-disc ratio) are also useful for evaluating glaucoma progression (9–11).
Despite the utility of OCT, there are also challenges in glaucoma detection and its progression with this technology. These challenges are the result of structural variability in healthy eyes, overlap in structural measurements between healthy and early glaucomatous eyes and abnormal appearing eyes that do not show any evidence of disease progression over time (e.g., physiologic cupping). Additionally, normal age-related structural loss can confound the interpretation of longitudinal glaucoma assessment (12–15).
OCT comparison with functional visual testing, such as standard automated perimetry (SAP), also introduces a substantial challenge when assessing disease progression. The measurement variability of SAP is high and can be influenced by many confounding factors (16) (17). Additionally, the association between structural and functional abnormalities in glaucoma varies with disease severity, which should also be considered when assessing progression with these methods. In early stages of the disease, the high variability in SAP measurements often delay the possibility of detecting functional progression at a time when changes might be noticed with structural assessment. A “tipping point” was reported, illustrating the point in disease severity before which structural and functional changes often disagree and after which there is a strong association between the two (18). Other studies have demonstrated that the SAP 24-2 testing strategy misses more central points compared with the 10-2 strategy in early glaucomatous losses (19). Given the improved ability to detect macular thinning of RNFL and GCL in recent iterations of the technology, an improved agreement between macular structure and visual function might be present in earlier stages than previously described.
In advanced disease the opposite situation occurs in which the RNFL, as measured with OCT, is less sensitive than SAP in detecting progression after a minimum measurable thickness is reached; this is referred as the “floor effect” (20) (21). It should be noted, however, that there are also limitations in visual field diagnosis of progression, with mean sensitivities between 19 to 15dB due to a reduction in the asymptotic maximum response (22) (23). Furthermore, longitudinal analysis of OCT macular and ONH parameters demonstrated their ability to detect structural progression even at stages where the peripapillary RNFL reached the “floor effect” thickness (24). In a cohort of advanced glaucoma, defined by visual field mean deviation (MD) ≤ 21dB, another study showed a significant rate of GCIPL thinning in 31% of the eyes (25). It has also been demonstrated in an advanced glaucoma group that GCIPL had a rate of change of −0.21 μm/year and that the dynamic range above the measurable floor was larger than peripapillary RNFL and minimum rim width (MRW) (26). Therefore, macular OCT measurements provide an alternative for objective and quantitative monitoring of subjects with advanced glaucoma.
In order to address these challenges and explore opportunities in glaucoma progression detection, several new technologies, modalities and image processing tools are being studied. The assessment of the structure-function association with newer software and the introduction of advanced statistical methods to analyze and predict progression from large longitudinal data sets are promising tools to be incorporated into clinical practice. Additionally, novel modalities and technologies are enabling the introduction of new biomarkers that may further enhance the assessment of glaucoma progression and improve the understanding of the disease pathophysiology.
Novel OCT Technologies and Applications
Swept-Source (SS-) OCT is a newer generation of OCT that uses a short cavity swept laser with a tunable wavelength of operation. It has a longer central wavelength (1050nm) compared to conventional SD-OCT (840nm), providing deeper penetration and eliminating the depth-dependent signal drop-off observed with earlier generations of OCT. These capabilities enable imaging of deeper ocular structures, such as the choroid and lamina cribrosa (LC) (27–29). Additionally, improved visualization of the RCG layer allowed for the introduction of a model to estimate RGC quantity, which may be useful for understanding the longitudinal structure-function association (30).
OCT angiography (OCTA) employs decorrelation motion contrast between rapidly repeated OCT cross-section scans to document retinal vessels. This is achieved by detecting variations in the intensity and/or phase properties of the OCT signal resulting from the movement of red blood cells (31). OCTA allows the peripapillary, ONH and macular vasculature to be evaluated at various depths, exposing several vascular networks (32 ). The peripapillary and ONH capillaries have been demonstrated to be associated with glaucoma (33–37). The flow index (mean decorrelation value on the en-face retinogram) and vessel density (area occupied by large vessels and microvasculature), have been shown to be associated with disease severity as reflected by SAP global indices (38). Additional studies demonstrated a reduction in peripapillary vessel density in the hemispheres corresponding to hemifield defects in visual fields (39) (40). In eyes with glaucoma and a single-hemifield defect, diminished vascular density of the macular and peripapillary regions was also demonstrated in unaffected hemifields (41). OCTA of eyes with glaucoma and LC defects portrayed diminished vascular density corresponding to the locations of these defects (42).
A recent longitudinal study with a short follow-up period of less than 14 months showed a significantly faster rate of change of the superficial capillary plexus density in glaucomatous eyes compared to glaucoma suspects and healthy eyes (43). This initial promising result should be corroborated by additional studies evaluating changes in other regions.
Color Doppler imaging (CDI) showed significantly lower blood flow velocities and higher resistive indexes in the central retinal artery, short posterior ciliary arteries, and ophthalmic artery in patients with clinically worsening primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) (44) (45). Doppler OCT was previously reported to measure total flow around the ONH, but small vessel flow could not be detected (46). Recently, high-speed en face Doppler OCT showed reduced total retinal blood flow in diabetic eyes compared with healthy eyes (47). The value of vascular flow quantification in assessing glaucoma progression is yet to be determined.
The incorporation of adaptive optics (AO) systems into ophthalmic imaging has further improved achievable image quality (48). AO corrects for the monochromatic optical aberrations of the eye, thus improving the resolution of ocular imaging technologies (49). For example, AO-OCT improves transverse resolution from the typical 20μm to approximately 5μm (50). Pruning of RGC dendrites has been shown to be an early indicator of glaucomatous damage (51); using an AO system conjugated with scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) investigators showed that imaging of individual RGC bodies is possible in humans (52). Additional studies with AO systems have demonstrated changes in the LC microstructure in glaucomatous eyes (53) (54). Others have allowed detection of damage down to individual retinal fiber layer bundles and the inner and outer retinal layers in glaucoma (55) (56). This technology, however, still presents some barriers to its widespread adoption, namely high cost, limited field of view, narrow depth of focus, and extended acquisition time (48).
Other experimental OCT systems that are potentially useful for glaucoma follow-up are polarization-sensitive (PS-) OCT and visible light (Vis-) OCT. PS-OCT generates images with tissue-specific contrast based on properties that alter the polarization state, such as birefringence (sclera, RNFL), polarization-preservation (photoreceptors) and depolarization (RPE) (57). Vis-OCT can provide both structural and functional information from the same scan. The device uses a broad wavelength within the visible light spectrum that can be parsed to determine oxygenated and de-oxygenated blood and thus determine the oxygen consumption of the tissue as a functional surrogate. The utility of these novel biomarkers for longitudinal assessment is yet to be determined.
Conventional RNFL assessment is based on pre-defined sectoral analysis; however, in some instances, this approach may overlook localized defects and their progression. Focusing on the affected area, also known as the region of interest (ROI), was tested as an alternative approach in eyes with disc hemorrhage, a high-risk population for progression (58). The ROI approach was superior to global RNFL thickness in detection of localized loss. This approach could also be applied for measuring and monitoring disease progression in other structures.
The improvements to OCT scan speed and resolution have resulted in better imaging of the ONH. Parameters such as rim area, vertical rim thickness and vertical cup-to-disc ratio have been shown to allow detection of glaucoma progression (59). In cross-sectional studies, MRW showed a high association with glaucomatous functional changes on SAP (60) (61).
The LC has been suggested as an important target for axonal injury in glaucoma, as certain structural and biomechanical features within this structure may lead to neuronal damage. Advanced imaging offered by current technologies allows for in vivo evaluation of LC structures, including prelaminar tissue, LC thickness, localized LC defects, LC insertion depth, and posterior displacement (62) (63) (53) (54). SS-OCT was used for a three-dimensional evaluation of the LC in normal tension glaucoma, which demonstrated a significant correlation between LC thickness and both RNFL thickness and the MD of the visual field (64). Statistically significant differences in LC microstructure have been reported between healthy and glaucomatous eyes (65).
The biomechanics of the LC determine tissue deformation in response to its pressure environment. Locations with marked deformations might strangulate the passing axons, leading to impaired functionality (66) (67). Given the LC’s pivotal role in glaucoma pathophysiology, its parameters are potential biomarkers for glaucoma progression management.
Other Ophthalmic Imaging Modalities
Multispectral imaging (MSI) is a noninvasive tool for examining layers of the retina and choroid by using light wavelengths from 550 to 850nm. By combining images along a range of wavelengths, maps can be generated to reflect the oxygenated and de-oxygenated blood content within the vasculature (68). Retinal oxygen saturation was reported to be positively correlated with visual field and RNFL thickness; a negative correlation was seen between oxygen saturation in the choroid plexus and RNFL thickness (69). MSI has also been used to measure increased venular retinal oxygen saturation in POAG compared to healthy subjects (70). Measurements using MSI have illustrated differential light absorption in neuroretinal rim tissue that is associated with visual field sensitivity in POAG (71).
As glaucoma is an optic neuropathy often suggested to have a central nervous system component (72), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology has been introduced as a potential tool for glaucoma progression detection. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) MRI studies have demonstrated abnormalities in the optic radiation and optic nerve that correlate with glaucoma severity (73) (74). In vivo MRI on glaucomatous animal models has been successfully used to demonstrate increased retinal and choroidal blood flow with topical dorzolamide therapy (75). Each of these findings supports the role of MRI as a potential modality in detecting glaucoma progression.
Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) is an MRI technique that detects macromolecules and their associated water molecules. In POAG patients, this ability to detect axonal and myelin loss has been used to reveal optic nerve atrophy and degeneration of the optic pathway (76). Researchers have used this tool in humans to identify increased demyelination in the optic chiasm, calcarine fissure, geniculocalcarine, and striate area in POAG compared to control eyes (76) (77). While this is a step towards understanding the pathogenesis of optic nerve changes in glaucoma, MTI applicability towards detecting POAG progression has not been delineated (77).
Functional MRI (fMRI) is capable of producing cortical mapping of visual function (78). Human eye studies have revealed the ability of fMRI to detect inner retinal layer thinning, optic nerve cupping and reduced visual cortex activity prior to any evidence of visual field impairment on SAP testing (79). Pursuing additional functional imaging techniques, researchers have also used proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MR spectroscopy) to assess cross sectional glaucoma diagnosis. These methods have revealed a correlation between choline metabolism disruptions within the visual field and disease severity on diffusion tensor MRI and visual field assessment (79). Longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are still needed before conclusions can be drawn about the clinical utility of these methods.
Combining Structure and Function
As discussed above, the association between structural and functional changes varies along the spectrum of glaucoma severity. Novel technologies now offer automated and precise co-localization of structural and predicted functional information as a first step toward better determination of disease progression (80) (81).
Another approach is using structural and functional information to estimate the number of RGC axons in the eye. This model estimates the structural RGC axon quantity from OCT RNFL thickness. Functional estimates of RGCs are based on conversion models developed from histological studies of monkeys (82–84). Because SAP is less sensitive in detecting early glaucomatous progression, the combined technique utilizes a weighted scale that takes into account the differences in OCT and SAP performances in different stages of disease. This method was shown to predict glaucomatous progression better than functional and structural evaluations independently (82) (85) (86).
Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine
Artificial intelligence is a computerized method that can be trained to detect relationships between information from multiple inputs and an output of interest. This method has been applied to visual function testing and optical imaging and has indicated an ability to accurately diagnose and detect disease change over time (87). One approach of artificial intelligence, namely deep learning (DL), has gained recent popularity as a promising tool for sensitive detection of disease progression. This method was developed to imitate multilevel processing performed by the human brain using linear and non-linear models. DL has been shown to be valuable in improving image quality (88) (89), enhancing reliability of automated segmentation (90) and diagnosing glaucoma (91) (92).
The application of telemedicine expands throughout medicine; accordingly, in glaucoma care, most uses are in disease screening with optic nerve photographs transmitted to glaucoma specialists (93). The ease of acquiring multiple images opens new opportunities for detection of disease progression.
Novel Biomarkers for Glaucoma Progression
Direct RCG imaging offers exciting prospects for diagnostic imaging in humans. Detection of apoptosing retinal cells (DARC) is one such method, which has offered encouraging results thus far. Annexin-5 is an endogenous extracellular calcium-dependent membrane-binding protein, ubiquitously expressed in human cells. In an early step in apoptosis, phosphatidyserine is translocated to the outer plasma membrane, where it is vulnerable to high-affinity binding with a fluorescently labeled annexin-5 molecule, which can subsequently be visualized and counted using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) (94) (95). In a proof-of-concept study it was demonstrated that this method could be effectively used in human eyes in vivo. Interestingly, in their post-hoc analysis, authors found high DARC counts could predict increased glaucoma progression rates. Phase 2 studies are being undertaken to continue to assess the potential role of DARC in evaluating disease progression.
Pre-Clinical Biomarkers
Fluorescently tagged cholera toxin subunit B, injected intravitreously, was used in mice to successfully label RGCs (96). Although this technique has been deemed safe in humans (97), its use has been limited thus far by its low specificity. In mouse models as many displaced amacrine cells have wound up labeled as RGCs (98).
Genetically encoded calcium indicators like GCaMPs are being explored as possible functional imaging tools to measure RGC damage (98). Fluorescently labeled GCaMP3 retinal cells can be detected in vivo with CSLO when directly exposed to UV light. While originally explored in transgenic mice, this labeling has now been performed using viral vectors, paving the way for its development into a tool for imaging human eyes in vivo (99).
RGC labeling with retrograde tracer molecules, such as Fluorogold, is highly effective in mouse models (98). Transgenic mouse models have also been used with a number of RGC-specific markers, such as THY monocyte differentiation antigen 1 (Thy1), ckit and Brn3b (95). Transgenic Thy1 mice that have been modified to express yellow fluorescent protein (Thy1-YFP) permit detailed visualization of neurons within the RGC. Once labeled, these retinas can be visualized in vivo with CSLO. Unfortunately, however, specificity can be lost as labels are phagocytosed by microglia and macrophages, and in many cases the tracer’s use is limited by its transient presence (98). Electroporation, an in vivo application of voltage to a membrane for transfection of genes or contrast agents into cells, is another labeling technique employed in animal models, which though very sensitive, is limited by its reduced specificity (100). Thus far none of these methods can be applied to humans (98).
Conclusion
Ophthalmic imaging innovations have revolutionized glaucoma diagnosis and management, and the tools, algorithms and biomarkers that are relevant to clinical practice are constantly evolving. As these parameters undergo constant research and development, they may contribute to further improvements in glaucoma progression detection. These novel biomarkers and approaches might aid in the understanding of specific etiologies and pathological mechanisms of glaucoma, such as those involving the biomechanics of the LC, thus contributing to the development of new future therapies.
Acknowledgments
Financial Support: Supported in part by National Institutes of Health R01-EY013178.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: Dr. Schuman receives royalties for intellectual property licensed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology to Zeiss.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophhthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–267. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bussel II, Wolstein G, Schuman JS. OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(Suppl 2):ii15–ii19. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kostanyan T, Sung KR, Schuman JS, et al. Glaucoma Structural and Functional Progression in American and Korean Cohorts. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(4):783–788. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Leung CK. Diagnosing glaucoma progression with optical coherence tomography. Curr Opin Ophhthalmology. 2014;25(20):104–111. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huang D, Swansom EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.1957169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(3):325–332. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100030081025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mwanza JC, Oakley JD, Budenz DL, et al. Ability of cirrus HD-OCT optic nerve head parameters to discriminate normal from glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(2):241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):217–222. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Naghizadeh F, Garas A, Vargha P, et al. Detection of early glaucomatous progression with different parameters of the RTVue optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(4):195–198. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31826a9707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Na JH, Sung KR, Baek S, et al. Detection of glaucoma progression by assessment of segmented macular thickness data obtained using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(7):3817–3826. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sung KR, Sun JH, Na JH. Progression detection capability of macular thickness in advanced glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):308–313. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leung CK, Yu M, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a prospective analysis of age-related loss. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(4):731–737. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sung KR, Wollstein G, Bilonick, et al. Effect of age on optical coherence tomography measurements of healthy retinal nerve fiber layer, macula, and optic nerve head. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(6):1119–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leung CK, Ye C, Weinreb RN, et al. Impact of age-related change of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thicknesses on evaluation of glaucoma progression. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2485–2492. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Viana JR, Danthurebandara VM, Sharpe GP, et al. Importance of normal aging in estimating the rate of glaucomatous neuroretinal rim and retinal nerve fiber layer loss. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(12):2392–2398. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grewal DS, Tanna AP. Diagnosis of glaucoma and detection of glaucoma progression using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(2):150–161. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835d9e27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dong ZM, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. Clinical utility of optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(9):OCT556–567. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wollstein G, Kagemann L, Bilonick RA, et al. Retinal nerve fibre layer and visual function loss in glaucoma: the tipping point. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(1):47–52. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.196907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.De Moraes CG, Hood DC, Thenappan A, et al. 24-2 visual fields miss central defects shown on 10-2 tests in glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertensives, and early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.021. pii: S0161–6420(16)32035–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mwanza JC, Budenz DL, Warren JL, et al. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness floor and corresponding functional loss in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(6):732–73. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hood DC, Kardon RH. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26(6):688–710. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gardiner SK, Swanson WH, Goren D, et al. Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(7):1359–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gardiner SK. Effect of a variability-adjusted algorithm on the efficiency of perimetric testing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(5):2983–2992. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lavinsky F, Schuman JS, Lucy KA, et al. Can macula and optic nerve head parameters detect glaucoma progression in eyes with advanced circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer damage? ARVO abstract. 2017:697. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Belghith A, Medeiros FA, Bowd C, et al. Structural change can be detected in advanced-glaucoma eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(9):OCT511–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, et al. Estimating optical coherence tomography structural measurement floors to imporve detection of progression in advanced glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang Z, Tatham AJ, Zangwill LM, et al. Diagnostic ability of retinal nerve fiber layer imaging by swept-source optic coherence tomography in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(1):193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chinn SR, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography using a frequency tunable optic source. Opt Lett. 1997;22(5):340–342. doi: 10.1364/ol.22.000340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nadler Z, Wang B, Wollstein G, et al. Automated lamina cribrosa microstructural segmentation in optical coherence tomography scans of healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Biomed Opt Express. 2013;4(11):2596–2608. doi: 10.1364/BOE.4.002596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Raza AS, Hood DC. Evaluation of the structure–function relationship in glaucoma using a novel method for estimating the number of retinal ganglion cells in the human retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(9):5548–5556. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kuehlewein L, Tepelus TC, An L, et al. Noninvasive visualization and analysis of the human parafoveal capillary network using swept source OCT optic microangiography. Invest Ophthalmol and Vis Sci. 2015;56(6):3984–3988. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Akil H, Falavarjani KG, Sadda RD, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of the optic disc; an overview. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017;12(1):98–105. doi: 10.4103/2008-322X.200162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Spaide RF, Klantchik JM, Jr, Cooney MJ. Retinal vascular layers imaged by fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2015;133(1):45–50. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mase T, Ishibazawa A, Nagoka T, et al. Radial peripapillary capillary network visualized using wide-field montage optical coherence tomographic angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(9):OCT504–10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mammo Z, Heisler M, Balaratnasingam C, et al. Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of radial peripapillary capillaries in glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;170:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aki H, Huang AS, Francis BA, et al. Retinal vessel density from optical coherence tomography angiography to differentiate early glaucoma, pre-perimetric glaucoma and normal eyes. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0170476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Geyman LS, Garg RA, Suwan Y, et al. Peripapillary perfused capillary density in primary open-angle glaucoma across disease stage: an optical coherence tomography study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309642. pii:bjophthalmol-2016–309642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu L, Jia L, Takusagawa HL, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of the peripapillary retina in glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(9):1045–1052. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Akagi T, IIda Y, Nakanishi H, et al. Microvasculature density in glaucomatous eyes with hemifield visual field defects: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:237–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen C-L, Bojikian KD, Wen JC, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer vascular microcirculation in eyes with glaucoma and single-hemifield visual field loss. JAMA ophthalmol. 2017;135(5):461–468. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yarmohammadi A, Zangwill LM, Diniz-Filho A, et al. Peripapillary and macular vessel density in patients with glaucoma and single-hemifield visual field defect. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(5):709–719. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shu MH, Zangwill LM, Manalastas PI, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density in glaucomatous eyes with focal lamina cribrosa defects. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(11):2309–2317. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shoji T, Zangwill LM, Akagi T, et al. Progressive macula vessel density loss in primary open angle glaucoma: a longitudinal study. Am Jour Ophthalmol. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.011. pii:S0002–9394(17)30306–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zeitz O, Galambos P, Wagenfeld L, et al. Glaucoma progression is associated with decreased blood flow velocities in the short posterior ciliary artery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(10):1245–8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.093633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Martínez A, Sánchez M. Predictive value of colour Doppler imaging in a prospective study of visual field progression in primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83(6):716–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang Y, Fawzi AA, Varma R, et al. Pilot study of optical coherence tomography measurement of retinal blood flow in retinal and optic nerve disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(2):840–835. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lee B, Novais EA, Waheed NK, et al. En face Doppler optical coherence tomography measurement of total retinal blood flow in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(3):244–251. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dong ZM, Wollstein G, Wang B, et al. Adaptive optics optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;57:76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Konstanyan T, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. New developments in optical coherence tomography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26(2):110–115. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hermann B, Fernandez EJ, Unterhuber A, et al. Adaptive-optics ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett. 2004;29(18):2142–2144. doi: 10.1364/ol.29.002142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Weber AJ, Kaufman PL, Hubbard WC. Morphology of single ganglion cells in the glaucomatous primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(12):2304–2320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rossia ET, Granger CE, Sharma R, et al. Imaging individual neurons in the retinal ganglion cell layer of the living eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(3):586–591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613445114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nadler Z, Wang B, Wollstein G, et al. Repeatability of in vivo 3D lamina cribrosa microarchitecture using adaptive optics spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 2014;5(4):1114–23. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.001114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nadler Z, Wang B, Schuman JS, et al. In vivo three-dimensional characterization of the healthy human lamina cribrosa with adaptive optics spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(11):6459–6466. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hood DC, Chen MF, Lee D, et al. Confocal adaptive optics imaging of peripapillary nerve fiber bundles: implications for glaucomatous damage seen on circumpapillary OCT scans. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2015;4(2):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.4.2.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Choi SS, Zawadzki RJ, Lim MC, et al. Evidence of outer retinal changes in glaucoma patients as revealed by ultrahigh-resolution in vivo retinal imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(1):131–41. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.183756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu S, Wang BB, Yin BM, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer reflectance for early glaucoma diagnosis. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(1):45–52. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829ea2a7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hood DC, Xin D, Wang D, et al. A region-of-interest approach for detecting progression of glaucomatous damage with optical coherence tomography. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(12):1438–1444. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Na JH, Sung KR, Lee JR, et al. Detection of glaucomatous progression by spectral- domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(7):1388–1395. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chauhan BC, O’Leary N, Almobarak FA. Enhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography-derived neuroretinal rim parameter. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(3):535–543. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gardiner SK, Ren R, Yang H, et al. A method to estimate the amount of neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucoma: comparison with current methods for measuring rim area. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(3):540–549. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Omodaka K, Takahashi S, Matsumoto A, et al. Clinical factors associated with lamina cribrosa thickness in patients with glaucoma as measured with swept source optical coherence tomography. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Park SC, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, et al. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of deep optic nerve complex structures in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Omodaka K, Horri T, Takahashi S, et al. 3D evaluation of the lamina cribrosa with the swept-source optical coherence tomography in normal tension glaucoma. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lucy KA, Wang B, Schuman JS, et al. Thick prelaminar tissue decreases lamina cribrosa visibility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:1751–1757. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kim TW, Kagemann L, Girard MJ, et al. Imaging of the lamina cribrosa in glaucoma: perspectives of pathogenesis and clinical applications. Curr Eye Res. 2013;38(9):903–909. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.800888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Burgoyne CF. A biomechamical paradigm for axonal insult within the optic nerve head in aging and glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2011;93:120–132. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2010.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zhang J, Yu Z, Liu L. Multimodality imaging in diagnosing polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Optometry and Vision Science. 2015;92(1):e21–e26. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li GY, Al-Wesabi SA, Zhang H. Retinal and choroidal oxygen saturation of the optic nerve head in open-angle glaucoma subjects by multispectral imaging. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(52):e5775. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mordant DJ, Al-Abboud I, Muyo G, et al. Oxygen saturation measurements of the retinal vasculature in treated asymmetrical primary open-angle glaucoma using hyperspectral imaging. Eye. 2014;28:1190–1200. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Denniss J, Schiessl I, Nourrit V, et al. Relationships between visual field sensitivity and spectral absorption properties of the neuroretinal rim in glaucoma by multispectral imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):8732–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gupta N, Yücel YH. Brain changes in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003;13(Suppl 3):S32–5. doi: 10.1177/112067210301303s06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dai H, Yin D, Hu C, et al. Whole-brain voxel-based analysis of diffusion tensor MRI parameters in patients with primary open angle glaucoma and correlation with clinical glaucoma stage. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(2):233–243. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1122-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhou W, Muir ER, Chalfin S, et al. MRI study of the posterior visual pathways in primary open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(2):173–181. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chandra S, Muir ER, Deo K, et al. Effects of dorzolamide on retinal and choroidal blood flow in the DBA/2J mouse model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(3):826–831. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kitsos G, Zikou AK, Bagli E, et al. Conventional MRI and magnetisation transfer imaging of the brain and optic pathway in primary open-angle glaucoma. Br J Radiol. 2009;82(983):896–900. doi: 10.1259/bjr/55866125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zhang Y, Liang W, Wu G, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging reveals geniculocalcarine and striate area degeneration in primary glaucoma: a preliminary study. Acta Radiol Open. 2016;5(9):2058460116666876. doi: 10.1177/2058460116666876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Duncan RO, Sample PA, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinotopic organization of primary visual cortex in glaucoma: Comparing fMRI measurements of cortical function with visual field loss. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26(1):38–56. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Murphy MC, Conner IP, Teng CY, et al. Retinal structures and visual cortex activity are impaired prior to clinical vision loss in glaucoma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31464. doi: 10.1038/srep31464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hood DC. Improving our understanding, and detection of glaucomatous damage: an approach based upon optical coherence tomography. Progress in Retinal and Eye Res. 2017;57:46–75. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hood DC, Raz AS, De Moraes CF, et al. Evaluation of one-page report to aid in detecting glaucomatous damage. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2014;3(6):8. doi: 10.1167/tvst.3.6.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Anderson DR, et al. Estimating the rate of retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(5):814–824. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL, 3rd, et al. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(9):3152–3160. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Harwerth RS, Wheat JL, Fredette MJ, et al. Linking structure and function in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29(4):249–271. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Meira-Freitas D, Lisboa R, Tantham A, et al. Predicting progression in glaucoma suspects with longitudinal estimates of retinal ganglion cell counts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;54(6):4174–4183. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hirooka K, Izumibata S, Ukegawa K, et al. Estimating the rate of retinal ganglion cell loss to detect glaucoma progression: An observational cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(30):e4209. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bowd C, Goldbaum MH. Machine learning classifiers in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(6):396–405. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181783ab6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Orlando JI, Prokofyeva E, del Fresno M, et al. Convolutional neural network transfer for automated glaucoma identification. Proc SPIE. 2017;10160:101600U-1–101600U-10. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zilly J, Buhmann JM, Mahapatra D. Glaucoma detection using entropy sampling and ensemble learning for automatic optic cup and disc segmentation. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 2017;55:28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2016.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Miri MS, Abràmoff MD, Kwon YH, et al. A machine-learning graph-based approach for 3D segmentation of Bruch’s membrane opening from glaucomatous SD-OCT volumes. Med Image Anal. 2017;39:206–217. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chen X, Xu Y, Yan S, et al. Automatic feature learning for glaucoma detection based on deep learning. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells WM, Frangi AF, editors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2015. pp. 669–677. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Murata H, Iwase A, Araie M. Detecting preperimetric glaucoma with standard automated perimetry using a deep learning classifier. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(9):1974–1980. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rathi S, Tsui E, Mehta N, et al. The current state of teleophthalmology in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.026. pii:S0161–6420(17)30496–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Meers P, Mealy T. Calcium-dependent annexin V binding to phospholipids: Stoichiometry, specificity, and the role of negative charge. Biochemistry. 1993;32(43):11711–11721. doi: 10.1021/bi00094a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Balendra SI, Normando EM, Bloom PA, et al. Advances in retinal ganglion cell imaging. Eye. 2015;29:1260–1269. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Smith CA, Chauhan BC. Imaging retinal ganglion cells: enabling experimental technology for clinical application. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;44:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Aman AT, Fraser S, Merritt EA, et al. A mutant cholera toxin B subunit that binds GM1-ganglioside but lacks immunomodulatory or toxic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(15):8536–8541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161273098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Smith CA, Vianna JR, Chauhan BC. Assessing retinal ganglion cell damage. Eye (Lond) 2017;31(2):209–217. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Yin L, Masella B, Dalkara D, et al. Imaging light responses of foveal ganglion cells in the living macaque eye. J Neurosci. 2014;34(19):6596–6605. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4438-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zheng QA, Chang DC. High-efficiency gene transfection by in situ electroporation of cultured cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991;1088(1):104–110. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90158-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
