Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):131–137. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000684

Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Incidence and Risk Factors in the United States From the National Inpatient Sample 1998–2013

Daniel S Rubin , Monica Matsumoto , Guy Weinberg °, Steven Roth #
PMCID: PMC5777869  NIHMSID: NIHMS903647  PMID: 29280923

Abstract

Background

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity is a rare and potentially devastating complication of regional anesthesia. Single institution registries have reported a decreasing incidence, but these results have limited broad applicability. A recent study using a United States database found a relatively high incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. We used the National Inpatient Sample, a United States database of inpatient admissions, to identify the national incidence and associated risk factors for local anesthetic systemic toxicity in total joint arthroplasties.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we studied patients undergoing hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty, from 1998 to 2013 with an adjunct peripheral nerve blockade. We used a multivariable logistic regression to identify patient conditions, hospital level variables, and procedure sites associated with local anesthetic systemic toxicity.

Results

710,327 discharges met inclusion criteria. The average adjusted incidence was 1.04/1,000 peripheral nerve blocks, with decreasing trend over the 15-year study period (OR: 0.90, P = 0.002). Shoulder arthroplasty [OR: 4.35, P = 0.0001] compared with knee or hip arthroplasty, and medium [OR: 3.34 P = 0.003] and large [OR: 2.40 P = 0.025] sized hospitals as compared with small hospitals were associated with increased odds of local anesthetic systemic toxicity.

Conclusion

The incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity nationally in total joint arthroplasty with adjunct nerve blocks is similar to recent estimates from academic centers, with a small decreasing trend through the study period. Despite an overall low incidence rate practitioners should continue to maintain vigilance for manifestations of local anesthetic systemic toxicity, especially as the use of regional anesthesia continues to increase.

Keywords: LAST, Peripheral nerve block, Total Joint Arthroplasty, Database

INTRODUCTION

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a potentially devastating but rare complication of regional anesthesia. Estimating the frequency of LAST events in the context of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) is challenging due to their infrequent occurrence as well as the range of their attendant clinical signs and symptoms of LAST. Recent estimates demonstrate a low incidence and suggest a decreasing rate trend; however, most of these studies have been determined from regional anesthesia registries and single institution quality improvement or billing queries, thus lacking generalizability to national practice.14 A recent study using a United States database found the incidence of LAST was 1.8/1,000 PNBs, noticeably higher than previous estimates.5 However, this study did not directly identify a diagnosis of LAST but used the presence of surrogate outcomes, such as a diagnosis of seizure, or cardiac arrest and administration of Intralipid (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, Illinois), to identify the incidence of LAST.5 The results lead to a question of whether improvements in technique, utilization of ultrasound guidance and awareness of LAST have led to decreases in the rate of LAST in the United States.

We hypothesized that in total joint arthroplasties the incidence of LAST will be low with a decreasing trend. Further, we determined differences in LAST incidence secondary to arthroplasty site, patient characteristics and hospital factors such as location and bed size. To test our hypotheses, we searched the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1998 to 2013 for LAST events in total joint arthroplasties of the hip, knee, and shoulder.

METHODS

Data Source

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) is an approximately 20% stratified survey of in-patient discharges in non-federal hospitals in the United States.6 Because the NIS is such a large sample of discharges in the United States it is ideal for studying low frequency complications such as LAST.7 NIS data are generated from discharge abstracts and include age, race, total charges, hospital characteristics including teaching status and location, discharge disposition, and up to 25 diagnostic and 15 procedural codes defined in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM).8 The University of Chicago Institutional Review Board exempted this research from review since there are no direct patient identifiers.

In 2012, the NIS was redesigned to improve national estimates, by sampling all participating hospitals rather than a subset.6 Secondary to the re-design, data from previous years (1998–2011) must be weighted appropriately to create accurate national estimates. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) provides updated discharge weights for years 1998 to 2011 to ensure accurate weighting of discharges prior to the redesign. We used these updated trend weights combined with the survey function for all patient level analysis and regressions, as previously described.7

Data Classification

Our retrospective analysis used 2 methods to identify discharges that constituted the study population. The first used an ICD-9-CM procedure code for primary or revision arthroplasty of the hip, knee, and shoulder, and in the second, we used a cancelled surgical procedure code (V64.1, V64.3) with an admission diagnosis consistent with a total joint arthroplasty. LAST complications including seizure and cardiac arrest may trigger postponement of the planned surgical procedure, but these patients should be included in the study population. Therefore, the second method identified this group of patients since they would be missed in the search for primary or revision arthroplasty. Discharges with a cancelled surgical procedure code that contained a non-arthroplasty orthopedic procedure were excluded from the study cohort. See table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, for all ICD-9-CM codes used. The 2 sets of patients were combined for the calculation of incidence and complication rates.

PNBs used as the primary anesthetic are not recorded in the NIS, however, PNBs not used as the primary anesthetic are recorded using ICD-9-CM codes (04.81). Arthroplasty patients with a procedure code for a PNB were included in the analysis.

A diagnosis of LAST was identified using 2 different ICD-9-CM codes with the presence of either indicating LAST: poisoning by peripheral nerve and plexus blocking anesthetics and unspecified local anesthetics (968.6,968.9), and External Injury Codes for peripheral nerve and plexus blocking anesthetics and other unspecified local anesthetics causing adverse effects (E938.6, E938.9). External injury codes for local anesthetics identify adverse events when the correct drug and dose was properly administered but still led to an adverse effect.9 These codes are also unlikely to represent a nerve injury secondary to a PNB, as they would be represented by injury to peripheral nerve codes (995.0-9 and 996.0-9). External injury codes and poisoning codes have been previously utilized to evaluate national incidence of adverse drug effects in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) method series and for maternal complications from regional anesthesia during labor and delivery.9,10 In 2001 external injury codes were present in > 85% of discharges with an injury diagnosis in NIS with a subsequent improvement in overall reporting to > 92% by 2012.11

Manifestations of LAST were divided into 4 categories: neurological, cardiac major, cardiac minor, and unknown. Neurological included other convulsions (780.39); major cardiac complications included cardiac arrest (427.5), ventricular fibrillation (427.4), ventricular tachycardia (427.1), cardiac complications (arrest, insufficiency, failure) resulting from a procedure (997.1) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (99.60, 99.63). A major complication of LAST occurred if a diagnosis of neurological, major cardiac or a cancelled surgical procedure complication was present for that discharge record. Minor cardiac complications included other heart rhythms (427.9, 427.89). To prevent overestimation, discharges that included both major and minor cardiac diagnoses were included only in the major cardiac group. Discharges were classified as unknown if they did not contain an additional diagnosis consistent with known LAST complications.

Patient and Surgical Characteristics

Patient characteristics included: age (years, categorical variable in quintiles), gender, type of admission (elective, emergent), and race (white, non-white, missing). Potential risk factors were identified prior to analysis based upon previous case series, case reports and a practice advisory as recommended in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.12 Risk factors included were cardiac (congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease or other heart disease), pulmonary (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma), renal (chronic kidney disease), neurological (late effects of cerebrovascular disease), hepatic (hepatitis and other liver diseases) and metabolic conditions (nutritional deficiencies, disorders of lipid metabolism, electrolyte and fluid disorders, other nutritional deficiencies, endocrine and metabolic disorders). See table, Supplemental Digital Content 2 for Clinical Classification Codes included to identify patient conditions.1315 Additionally we identified hospital level factors including hospital location and teaching status (rural, urban non-teaching, urban teaching), and hospital bed size (small, medium, large) as defined by HCUP.6

Statistical Analysis

The primary outcome was an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for LAST during an admission for a total joint arthroplasty and a peripheral nerve block for post-operative pain control. We utilized the AHRQ trend weights, and the survey functions of STATA for all national estimates and regressions performed on the data, as described previously.7 Significant quantities of data were missing from race (n= 113,554 16%). Race was included in the univariable and multivariable regression by adding a missing category to each data element.

Patient characteristics for all procedures were compared from 1998 to 2013 using the national estimates, and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Chi-square test with a second order Rao-Scott correction compared categorical variables. Comparison of the different incidence rates by procedure was performed using an adjusted Wald test.16 A temporal trend for LAST was determined using a multivariable logistic regression with year as a continuous independent variable.14 A univariable logistic regression was performed to test for a temporal trend in PNB utilization rates for all total joint arthroplasty sites. A univariate logistic regression was performed for independent variables including patient characteristics, procedure site and hospital characteristics to identify covariates associated with LAST.6 Categorical variables were treated as nominal variables in the regression. P < 0.10 identified significant risk factors for inclusion in the multivariable logistic regression. P <0.05 in the multivariable logistic regression was considered significant, and the odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals and P values were reported.

A variance inflation factor (VIF) > 5 identified possible collinearity between predictors. Pearson’s goodness-of-fit assessed the multivariable model fit and was not significant at the 5% level (P =0.94), thus the multivariable model could not be rejected. STATA v14.0-MP (Stata, College Station, TX) was used for all data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 15,356,582 discharges were estimated to contain a procedure code or diagnosis consistent for total joint arthroplasty in the NIS between 1998–2013. A PNB procedure code was present in 710,327 discharges for an overall rate of 4.6%. PNB utilization increased through the study period for all arthroplasty procedure sites (P=0.0001) [Figure 1]. Patient characteristics, procedure rates and manifestations of LAST are presented in table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Peripheral nerve block by procedure

The frequency of adjunct peripheral nerve blocks increased for all three procedures throughout the study period (P = 0.0001). Yearly utilization of peripheral nerve blocks was calculated as a percent of the total number of arthroplasty procedures performed by each surgical site and overall for each year. Peripheral nerve blocks in the National Inpatient Sample are recorded only when they are not used as the primary anesthetic.

Hip=Hip arthroplasty Knee=Knee arthroplasty Shoulder=Shoulder arthroplasty Overall=combined frequency for all three procedures.

PNBs: Peripheral nerve blocks

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with and without LAST and odds ratio from a univariable logistic regression.


LAST (n) No LAST (n) Odds ratio [95%
CI]
P-
value
All patients 737 709,590

Age <57 124 (16.8) 159,032(22.4) Ref

58–65 153 (20.8) 176,040 (24.8) 1.11 [0.65–1.92] 0.698

66–72 174 (23.6) 171,812 (24.2) 1.29 [0.77–2.17] 0.330

73–78 159 (21.6) 114,906 (16.2) 1.77 [1.02–3.07] 0.041

>78 126 (17.1) 87,640 (12.4) 1.83 [1.03–3.27] 0.040

Sex Male 227 (30.8) 272,242 (38.4) Ref

Female 510 (69.2) 436,958 (61.6) 1.40 [0.94–2.09] 0.095

Race White 530 (71.9) 518,306 (73.0) Ref

Non-white 86 (11.7) 77,850 (11.0) 1.08 [0.65–1.79] 0.765

Missing 121 (16.4) 113,434 (16.0) 1.04 [0.65–1.67] 0.875

Chronic conditions Cardiac 164 (22.3) 112,174 (15.8) 1.53 [1.04–2.24] 0.029

Pulmonary 132 (17.9) 106,109 (15.0) 1.25 [0.81–1.91] 0.314

Renal 30 (4.1) 26,139 (3.7) 1.10 [0.48–2.54] 0.819

Neurological <10 (<1.4) 4,031 (0.6) 1.25 [0.16–9.45] 0.830

Hepatic 12 (1.6) 10,350 (1.5) 1.12 [0.26–4.82] 0.874

Metabolic 435 (59.0) 391,294 (55.1) 1.17 [0.82–1.67] 0.382

Type of admission Elective 654 (88.7) 659,565 (93.0) 0.57 [0.32–1.05] 0.070

Emergent 62 (8.4) 35,821 (5.0) Ref

Missing 21 (2.8) 14,203 (2.0) 0.84 [0.23–3.11] 0.796

Procedure site Hip 45 (6.1) 47,986 (6.7) Ref

Knee 433 (58.8) 601,233 (84.7) 0.77 [0.36–1.66] 0.508

Shoulder 259 (35.1) 60,371 (8.5) 4.61[2.05–10.4] 0.0001

Hospital location and teaching Urban teaching 315 (42.7) 346,134 (48.8) Ref

Urban non-teaching 315 (42.7) 274,307 (38.7) 1.26 [0.82–1.94] 0.287

Rural 107 (14.5) 85,719 (12.1) 1.38 [0.77–2.46] 0.281

Hospital bedsize Large 434 (58.9) 391,655 (55.2) 2.91 [1.35–6.30] 0.007

Medium 254 (34.5) 185,480 (26.1) 3.59 [1.62–7.95] 0.002

Small 49 (6.6) 129,024 (18.2) Ref

Results are nationwide estimates. Numbers are presented as count estimates or means with percentages in parentheses and respective 95% confidence intervals when indicated. Results less than 10 cannot be reported due to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality regulations. “Non-white” race category includes Black, Hispanic, Native American, Asian and Pacific Islander, and Other. Hospital bedsize, location, and teaching status are based on National Inpatient Sample Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project categories.

Chronic conditions were identified as risk factors, including more specifically: cardiac (congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease or other heart disease), pulmonary (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma), renal (chronic kidney disease), neurological (late effects of cerebrovascular disease), hepatic (hepatitis and other liver diseases) and metabolic conditions (nutritional deficiencies, disorders of lipid metabolism, electrolyte and fluid disorders, other nutritional deficiencies, endocrine and metabolic disorders).

Abbreviations: LAST = local anesthetic systemic toxicity

A diagnosis code for LAST was present in 737 discharges for an overall incidence of 1.04/1,000 PNBs [CI: 0.49–1.80] (Table 2). The incidence of LAST was highest in shoulder arthroplasty 4.27/1,000 PNBs [CI: 2.87–5.67] than hip 0.93/1,000 [CI: 0.21–1.65] or knee arthroplasty 0.72/1,000 [CI: 0.54–0.90] (P=0.0001) (Table 2)(Figure 2). External cause of injury codes (E938.6 and E938.9) were the identifying codes for a diagnosis of LAST in 99% of the discharges as compared to the poisoning diagnostic codes (968.6 and 968.9).

Table 2.

Mean incidence of LAST and LAST with known major complications per 1,000 peripheral nerve blocks by procedure type and overall.


Mean LAST
Incidence
[95% CI]
Mean LAST
Incidence with
documented major
complications
[95% CI]
Hip 0.93 [0.21–1.65] 0.10 [0.0–0.33]

Knee 0.72 [0.54–0.90] 0.13 [0.06–0.20]

Shoulder 4.27* [2.87–5.67] 1.15* [0.49–1.80]

Overall 1.04 [0.49–1.80] 0.22 [0.13–0.30]

Shoulder arthroplasty had a higher incidence of LAST and LAST with major complications as compared to both knee and hip arthroplasty. A major complication of LAST includes a diagnosis of neurological, major cardiac or a cancelled surgical procedure complication in the discharge record. Comparison of the different incidence rates by procedure was performed using an adjusted Wald test.

(*= Significant P value < 0.005)

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; LAST = local anesthetic systemic toxicity

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

A–D. Overall LAST Incidence by Procedure Site

Shoulder arthroplasty demonstrated the highest yearly frequency of overall diagnoses of LAST with two spikes in events noted from 2001–2002 and 2007, followed by a decreasing trend (P = 0.002). The frequency of yearly LAST was calculated by dividing the number of diagnoses by the total number of arthroplasty procedures performed with a peripheral nerve block, for each procedure site and overall. (A) Shoulder arthroplasty (B) Knee Arthroplasty (C) Hip Arthroplasty (D) All procedures combined.

LAST=Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity

The incidence of LAST with documented major complications was 0.22/1000 PNBs [CI: 0.13–0.30](Figure 3). Major complications were documented in 21% (157/737) of patients with LAST, and types of complications can be seen in Table 3. The most common major complication was convulsions 8.1% (60/737), followed by major cardiac complications in 6.8% (50/737). A postponed surgical procedure code was present in 12.5% of discharges containing a diagnosis of LAST (92/737). Discharges containing a diagnosis for LAST had higher rates of major complications as compared to discharges without a diagnosis of LAST (P=0.0001). Mortality associated with a diagnosis of LAST was 0% and did not differ from discharges without a diagnosis of LAST (0.07%)(P=0.794).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Major LAST Complications by Procedure

Shoulder arthroplasty had the highest yearly frequency of LAST with major complications with a spike in frequency seen at 2003 and 2007. The frequency of LAST with major complications was calculated by dividing the number of diagnoses with major complications by the total number of arthroplasty procedures performed with a peripheral nerve block, for each procedure site and overall.

Hip=Hip arthroplasty Knee=Knee arthroplasty Shoulder=Shoulder arthroplasty Overall=combined frequency for all three procedures.

LAST=Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity

Table 3.

Manifestations of LAST.

Manifestations LAST (n (%)) No LAST (n (%)) P-value
Cardiac major Cardiac arrest/Cardiopulmonary resuscitation 17 (2.3) 437 (0.06) 0.0001
Arrhythmia 27 (3.7) 1,360 (0.19) 0.0001
Cardiac complications 10 (1.4) 3,838 (0.54) 0.201
Overall 50 (6.8) 5,304 (1.2) 0.0001
Cardiac minor Other cardiac dysrhythmia 32 (4.3) 20,488 (0.74) 0.2705
Convulsions 60 (8.1) 2,383 (0.34) 0.0001
Cancelled surgical procedure 92 (12.5) 900 (0.13) 0.0001
Unknown 566 (76.7) 681,998 (96.1) 0.0001

Discharges containing a diagnosis for LAST had higher rates of major complications as compared to the general arthroplasty cohort with a PNB without a diagnosis of LAST (P=0.0001) Manifestations of LAST were divided into four categories: cardiac major, cardiac minor, neurological and unknown. Major cardiac complications included: cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, arrhythmia (ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia), and cardiac complications (arrest, insufficiency, failure) resulting from a procedure. Neurological complications were convulsions. To prevent overestimation, patients who exhibited both major and minor cardiac symptoms were included only in the major cardiac group. Patients with a diagnosis of LAST without any of the above diagnosis were characterized as unknown manifestations.

LAST=Local anesthetic systemic toxicity. PNB=Peripheral nerve block

A univariable analysis is presented in table 1, and multivariable analysis is presented in table 4. In the multivariable analysis, the yearly trend of odds of LAST decreased during the study period by 10% per year [OR: 0.90 CI: 0.84–0.96 P=0.002]. Shoulder arthroplasty [OR: 4.35, CI: 1.96–9.65, P =0.0001] had a higher odds of LAST as compared to hip or knee arthroplasty. Hospital factors associated with an increased odds of LAST included large [OR: 2.40 CI: 1.12–5.15 P=0.025] and medium [OR: 3.34 CI: 1.52–7.33 P=0.003] sized hospitals compared to small hospitals; however, teaching status and urban/rural location were not significant. Further, age or patient medical conditions did not increase the odds of LAST in the multivariable analysis.

Table 4.

Multivariable logistic regression of patient, hospital and procedure variables for discharges containing a diagnosis of LAST.


Odds ratio [95% CI] P-value
Year 0.90 [0.84–0.96] 0.002

Elective Emergent Ref

Elective 0.81 [0.45–1.46] 0.484

Missing 0.28 [0.07–1.12] 0.073

Age <57 Ref

58–65 1.15 [0.66–2.01] 0.616

66–72 1.21 [0.71–2.05] 0.477

73–78 1.47 [0.84–2.59] 0.180

>78 1.40 [0.78–2.53] 0.261

Chronic conditions Cardiac 1.40 [0.94–2.09] 0.101

Procedure type Hip Ref

Knee 0.75 [0.36–1.59] 0.452

Shoulder 4.35 [1.96–9.65] 0.0001

Hospital Bed Size Small Ref

Medium 3.34 [1.52–7.33] 0.003

Large 2.40 [1.12–5.15] 0.025

A decreasing trend in a diagnosis of LAST is seen in addition to increased risk for upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks as compared to lower extremity nerve blocks. Hospital bed size is based on National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project categories.

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; LAST = local anesthetic systemic toxicity

DISCUSSION

In our study of a large nationally representative database, we identified an estimated LAST incidence of 1.04/1,000 PNBs, and documented major LAST complications were present in 0.22/1,000 PNBs. Further, the odds of a diagnosis of LAST decreased throughout the study period. Risk factors associated with an increased odds of LAST are shoulder arthroplasty as compared to knee and hip arthroplasty, and large and medium sized hospitals as compared to small hospitals.

Our estimate of the national incidence of LAST is similar to recent single institution, large academic center estimates demonstrating a low baseline incidence of LAST with a decreasing trend. Recent registry and single institution analyses have estimated the incidence of LAST between 0.87/1,000 PNBs and 0.04/1,000 PNBs with the primary source of variation between studies due to different criteria for what constitutes a diagnosis of LAST.14,17 For example, the Australian and New Zealand Registry of Regional Anesthesia (AURORA) identified an incidence of 0.87/1000 PNBs but included generalized central nervous system excitation as a criteria for LAST in addition to seizure and cardiac arrest.3 Alternatively, Liu et al limited LAST criteria to seizure and cardiac arrest and reported a LAST incidence of 0.04/1000 PNBs and no cardiac arrests.4 Thus we reported the rates of LAST with major complications and the overall incidence in the NIS.

Variation in our study between the incidence of LAST with major complications and LAST with unknown complications may be secondary to the ICD-9-CM codes used to identify an adverse or toxic effect from local anesthetics. The etiology of the complication dictates which ICD-9-CM code is applied, as adverse effects codes (E938.6, E938.9) apply when the local anesthetic was correctly prescribed and properly administered yet resulted in toxic effects, whereas toxic effects (968.6,968.9) apply when an error occurred and an unintended overdose of local anesthetic was administered8 Adverse event codes should be associated with the specific manifestation of the effect such as seizure or arrhythmia; however, since adverse event codes are not required for reimbursement additional diagnoses related to the complication may not have been coded for and led to the unknown category. Thus, the incidence of major complications may be underestimated by our method.

Our incidence of LAST with major complications is lower than in a recent study by Morwald, also utilizing a large nationally representative administrative database.18 Morwald identified an incidence of 1.8/1,000 PNBs for total joint arthroplasties; however, a diagnosis of LAST was not identified directly using ICD-9-CM codes. Rather a LAST diagnosis was identified in patients with a PNB if they experienced a major complication, such as cardiac arrest, Intralipid ® administration, or seizure. Despite the differences in our methods both studies identify a surprisingly high frequency of major LAST complications around the year 2007, most notably with shoulder arthroplasty, followed by a steady decrease. An increase in PNBs is also seen around the same time period and the increase in LAST frequency may be associated with an expansion of regional anesthesia practice, although this theory is speculative. Overall our rates of major complications appear consistent with other recent single institution and registry studies.

PNBs associated with shoulder arthroplasty had the highest odds of LAST as compared to hip and knee arthroplasty. Reasons for this disparity include higher blood concentrations of local anesthetic in brachial plexus blocks than femoral/sciatic blocks and proximity of the vasculature to the central nervous system.19,20 Our results appear consistent with previous studies reporting a higher incidence of LAST in patients undergoing upper extremity blocks.3,20 Further research is needed to confirm this finding and understand the mechanism for this difference.

Surprisingly, mortality was not increased in discharges containing a diagnosis of LAST. Mortality rates from case reviews estimated mortality from LAST between 1.1 and 10%, and an analysis of closed claims involving LAST showed 37% (7/19) of cases involved brain damage or death.13,14,21 Mortality estimates from case studies may be influenced by publication bias and may not accurately reflect the mortality from complications of LAST, thus mortality from LAST may be lower than previously thought. In our analysis there were 50 (6.8%) discharges with LAST containing major cardiac complications, thus we expected a higher mortality rate than was observed. Our analysis was unable to identify if Intralipid had any impact on mitigating the mortality from LAST.

Our study has several limitations. The NIS consists of information from discharge abstracts, and no relevant information pertaining to the type of block performed, amount and type of local anesthetic used, block technique nor any other information pertaining to the PNB is contained in the dataset. Therefore, our analysis cannot make any conclusions regarding PNB specific risk factors as they relate to LAST. Additionally, the NIS does not contain Current Procedural Terminology codes and thus our cohort consisted of PNBs that were performed not as the primary anesthetic. Our results may not be generalizable to patients that undergo PNBs for the primary anesthetic as factors influencing the block may be different.

The accuracy of coding for a diagnosis of LAST is unknown in administrative databases, such as the NIS. Errors in diagnosis coding can occur at the physician level or data abstraction level. Physician errors are added to the analysis by an inappropriate diagnosis on the chart, utilizing the wrong terminology for a diagnosis or omitting a diagnosis from the chart. Errors from medical coders occur when they misinterpret the chart and make incorrect decisions about which diagnosis to code for or to omit. LAST is a rare event and as such may be more susceptible to inappropriate ICD-9-CM coding as for malignant hyperthermia.22 Further, in our study the majority of discharges with a diagnosis of LAST were classified as unknown and did not contain an associated manifestation of LAST such as seizure or cardiac complication. However, previous studies have utilized these ICD-9-CM codes to identify a diagnosis of LAST.10,23 Additionally, rates of LAST complications were significantly higher in the LAST cohort as compared to the general PNB cohort. Despite these limitations, the NIS provides an opportunity to identify nationally representative incidence rates of LAST in the setting of total joint arthroplasty.

We identified the incidence of LAST as 1.04/1,000 PNBs with a trend indicating a decreasing incidence. LAST continues to persist as a rare, clinically relevant complication of PNB that remains more common than other recent academic estimates suggest. Our analysis identified risk factors for LAST including shoulder arthroplasty, large and medium hospital size. Future studies should test our findings through the use of other nationally representative databases in addition to identifying complications of PNBs using electronic medical records.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data File _.doc_ .tif_ pdf_ etc.__1
Supplemental Data File _.doc_ .tif_ pdf_ etc.__2

Acknowledgments

Funding

Funding was provided by National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland) grant UL1 RR024999 to the University of Chicago Institute for Translational Medicine

The authors are grateful to Ms. Chuanhong Liao, MS, Senior Biostatistician Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, for assistance with the statistical analysis.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest:

Dr. Weinberg is a founder and officer of ResQ Pharma, Inc and manages the educational website lipidrescue.org. The authors otherwise declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Sites BD, Taenzer AH, Herrick MD, et al. Incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity and postoperative neurologic symptoms associated with 12,668 ultrasound-guided nerve blocks: an analysis from a prospective clinical registry. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:478–482. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31825cb3d6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Orebaugh SL, Kentor ML, Williams BA. Adverse outcomes associated with nerve stimulator-guided and ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks by supervised trainees: update of a single-site database. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:577–582. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318263d396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barrington MJ, Kluger R. Ultrasound guidance reduces the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:289–299. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318292669b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu SS, Ortolan S, Sandoval MV, Curren J, Fields KG, Memtsoudis SG, YaDeau JT. Cardiac arrest and seizures caused by local anesthetic systemic toxicity after peripheral nerve blocks: should we still fear the reaper? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:5–21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mörwald EE, Zubizarreta N, Cozowicz C, Poeran J, Memtsoudis SG. Incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity in orthopedic patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42:442–445. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; [Accessed January 25, 2017]. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Available at: www.hcupnet.ahrq.gov/ [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rubin DS, Parakati I, Lee LA, Moss HE, Joslin CE, Roth S. Perioperative visual loss in spine fusion surgery: Ischemic optic neuropathy in the United States from 1998 to 2012 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Anesthesiology. 2016;125:457–464. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) [Accessed April 2, 2016]; http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm. Updated June 18th, 2013.
  • 9.Lucado J, Paez K, Elixhauser A. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. [Accessed January 27 2017]. Medication-Related Adverse Outcomes in U.S. Hospitals and Emergency Departments, 2008, HCUP Statistical Brief #109. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb109.pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.El Haj Ibrahim S, Fridman M, Korst LM, Gregory KD. Anesthesia complications as a childbirth patient safety indicator. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:911–917. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barrett M, Steiner C. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2015. [Accessed January 15 2017]. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project External Cause of Injury Code Evaluation Report, HCUP Method Series Report. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/methods.jsp. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Di Gregorio G, Neal JM, Rosenquist RW, Weinberg GL. Clinical presentation of local anesthetic systemic toxicity: a review of published cases, 1979 to 2009. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:181–187. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181d2310b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vasques F, Behr AU, Weinberg G, Ori C, Di Gregorio G. A Review of local anesthetic systemic toxicity cases since publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia recommendations: To whom it may concern. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:698–705. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Neal JM, Mulroy MF, Weinberg GL. American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine checklist for managing local anesthetic systemic toxicity: 2012 version. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:16–18. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31822e0d8a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Koch GGFD, Freeman JL. Strategies in the multivariate analysis of data from complex surveys. Int Stat Rev. 1975;43:59–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Bargues L, et al. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1274–1280. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200211000-00034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Morwald EE, Zubizarreta N, Cozowicz C, Poeran J, Memtsoudis SG. Incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity in orthopedic patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42:442–445. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tucker GT, Moore DC, Bridenbaugh PO, Bridenbaugh LD, Thompson GE. Systemic absorption of mepivacaine in commonly used regional block procedures. Anesthesiology. 1972;37:277–287. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197209000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brown DL, Ransom DM, Hall JA, Leicht CH, Schroeder DR, Offord KP. Regional anesthesia and local anesthetic-induced systemic toxicity: seizure frequency and accompanying cardiovascular changes. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:321–328. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199508000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee LA, Posner KL, Cheney FW, Caplan RA, Domino KB. Complications associated with eye blocks and peripheral nerve blocks: an American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:416–422. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2008.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pinyavat T, Rosenberg H, Lang BH, Wong CA, Riazi S, Brady JE, Sun LS, Li G. Accuracy of malignant hyperthermia diagnoses in hospital discharge records. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:55–63. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mhyre JM, Tsen LC, Einav S, Kuklina EV, Leffert LR, Bateman BT. Cardiac arrest during hospitalization for delivery in the United States, 1998–2011. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:810–818. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data File _.doc_ .tif_ pdf_ etc.__1
Supplemental Data File _.doc_ .tif_ pdf_ etc.__2

RESOURCES