Abstract
The light-induced double-bond isomerization of the visual pigment rhodopsin operates a molecular-level optomechanical energy transduction, which triggers a crucial protein structure change. In fact, rhodopsin isomerization occurs according to a unique, ultrafast mechanism that preserves mode-specific vibrational coherence all the way from the reactant excited state to the primary photoproduct ground state. The engineering of such an energy-funnelling function in synthetic compounds would pave the way towards biomimetic molecular machines capable of achieving optimum light-to-mechanical energy conversion. Here we use resonance and off-resonance vibrational coherence spectroscopy to demonstrate that a rhodopsin-like isomerization operates in a biomimetic molecular switch in solution. Furthermore, by using quantum chemical simulations, we show why the observed coherent nuclear motion critically depends on minor chemical modifications capable to induce specific geometric and electronic effects. This finding provides a strategy for engineering vibrationally coherent motions in other synthetic systems.
The ultrafast, vibrationally coherent photoisomerization of rhodopsin is a model of efficient photomechanical energy conversion at the molecular scale. Here, the authors demonstrate a similar photoreaction in synthetic compounds, unraveling the underlying mechanism and discussing its implications.
Introduction
While quantum mechanics rules chemical structure and reactivity, the field of quantum biology raises the question whether it may also rule biological functions like, for instance, in photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes possibly taking advantage of quantum coherence to enhance the efficiency of photochemical energy transfer and conversion1–3. A paradigmatic system at the interface of quantum chemistry and quantum biology is the animal visual pigment rhodopsin (Rh), in which the protein scaffold optimizes the photoisomerization of its co-factor, a protonated Schiff base of retinal (PSBR, see Fig. 1a). Indeed, the PSBR of Rh undergoes a high speed (200 fs4) and high quantum yield (Φ)5 isomerization, initiating the protein’s biological function. This event is driven by the vibrationally coherent nuclear motion of the chromophore along a barrierless excited state (S1) potential energy surface (PES) leading to decay to the ground state (S0) in the region of a conical intersection (CInt)6–11. Previous studies argued that the high Φ value of Rh is achieved through a precise phase relationship between two vibrational modes at the point of decay12. A vibrationally coherent motion would propagate this phase relationship from the Franck–Condon (FC) state to the decay region, thus providing a way of controlling the Φ value. Therefore, replicating such a mechanism in synthetic molecules would provide a route for the preparation of molecular devices with properties and efficiency programmed at the atomic level.
In the past, the above idea has stimulated mixed theoretical/experimental research efforts. Following quantum chemical modeling, the N-alkylated indanylidene–pyrroline (NAIP) molecular skeleton was synthesized and functionalized such that, in solution, it mimics the π-electron system and geometrical constraints of PSBR in rhodopsins13. As a result, the MeO-NAIP (see structure 1 in Fig. 1b) was observed to undergo an ultrafast photoisomerization14 with transient absorption spectroscopy data displaying low-frequency (60 to 80 cm−1, i.e., ~500 fs period) oscillatory features15,16 similar to those of the visual pigment featuring a 11-cis PSBR or light-sensing pigments featuring a 13-cis PSBR17. On the basis of quantum chemical simulations, these oscillations were attributed to ring deformation motion coupled to the reactive C=C bond twisting in the photoproduct16, indicating a coherent nuclear motion initiated in S1 and continued in S0 after decay through a CInt. However, as we will further discuss below, resonant laser pulses may trigger coherent vibrational motion also in the initial S0 state. For this reason, the proposed coherent S1 decay of 1 remains hypothetical. In addition, the photoisomerization quantum yield of 1 is significantly lower13,14 than that of Rh, and the precise understanding of the S1 dynamics is an unavoidable pre-requisite for the development of more efficient NAIP-based switches.
Here we perform UV-VIS transient absorption (TA) experiments with sub-10 fs pump pulses and broadband white light probing to perform vibrational coherence spectroscopy18 (see Methods section), in an experimental approach similar to that19 recently applied to Rh9. When it is resonant with any molecule’s absorption band, such a short pump pulse impulsively produces a non-stationary population described as a vibrational wavapacket in S1. It may, however, also produce a vibrational wavepacket in S0 via the so-called Impulsive-Stimulated Raman Scattering (ISRS) process20–25. This mechanism still operates with an off-resonant pump pulse, which produces vibrational wavepackets in S0 only. Here we compare the effects of resonant and off-resonance excitations on 1 and 2, where the methyl group on carbon C5 has been replaced by a hydrogen atom (see Fig. 1c). As we will detail below, such a comparison provides a compelling evidence that: (i) the S0 low-frequency mode, dominating the observed vibrational coherence of 1, originates in S1 and (ii) an elementary chemical modification of the MeO-NAIP structure, affecting its torsional geometry, quenches the signatures of such critical S1 motion in 2.
Results
Vibrational coherence spectroscopy
The TA data obtained upon resonant excitation of 1 and 2 are displayed in Fig. 2a, b, respectively. They may be interpreted, via the introduction of an effective linear susceptibility23, as the time-dependent, linear absorption of the probe beam by the non-stationary states impulsively produced by the pump pulse in S0 and S1. Accordingly, they reveal simultaneously transient species population kinetics in the form of UV-Vis absorption (from S1, bleached S0, or photoproduct) or emission (from S1 only), as well as the accompanying vibrational dynamics in terms of oscillations. We first describe the signatures of the electronic population kinetics. Negative signals are due to S0 bleaching (GSB) observed at λ < 400 nm, or to stimulated emission (SE) at λ > 450 nm. Positive signals are due to S1 absorption (ESA) at early times and absorption of the vibrationally hot S0 photoproduct (PA). The main difference between the electronic population kinetics of 1 and 2 is seen in the SE spectral shape and lifetime as well as in the early photoproduct signal. In compound 1 the SE extends far to the red (>700 nm). It impulsively decays to give rise to an early, almost octave-spanning, absorption spectrum of the photoproduct (420–700 nm at 300 fs). The same spectral signatures have already been reported for a set of NAIP compounds15,16 as well as for Rh7 and were attributed to a vibrational wavepacket evolving coherently through the CInt and driving the impulsive decay from S1 to S0. The signal zero crossing at the crossover between SE and PA in the low-energy side of the spectrum, occurring at 250 +/− 30 fs at 700 nm for 1, is thus interpreted as a measure of the time at which the molecular system crosses the CInt. In contrast, no such red-shifted SE and PA signatures are observed for 2. More specifically, the SE is spectrally narrower, longer-lived and the narrow PA signature rises progressively during the SE decay, both according to exponential kinetics (ref. 26 and Supplementary Information of ref. 27), in contrast to the TA signals of 1, which show dominant non-exponential features due to vibrational wavepackets.
The oscillatory signals (Fig. 2e, f, g, h) are isolated from the underlying electronic population kinetics by globally fitting the latter with a sum of exponential decay functions18. Fourier transforming the fit residuals reveals the frequencies associated with the vibrational wave packets observed along a time window covering the S1 reactive motion, decay, and S0 photoproduct formation. Figure 3a, b display the corresponding vibrational power spectra in blue. When using the non-resonant red to IR pulse instead of the 400 nm pulse as a pump pulse, no population is created in S1 and no electronic population dynamics is detected. However, coherent vibrational dynamics are excited in S0, by non-resonant ISRS, producing oscillatory TA signals, which are directly analyzed by Fourier transformation. The corresponding vibrational spectra are displayed in red in Fig. 3a, b.
For both compounds 1 and 2, the high-frequency vibrational activity (>500 cm−1) is observed in both on- and off- resonance experiments, and is therefore attributed to S0 vibrational activity. The dominating signatures are the 1572 cm−1 ethylenic stretch mode, the 1259 cm−1 mode localized on the indanylidene moiety28 as well as the 734 cm−1 and 651 cm−1 (2 only) modes reported here for the first time and unassigned. The 455 cm−1 mode (unassigned) may also be an S0 mode but its detection upon off-resonant excitation is likely impaired by the much more intense 492 cm−1 mode of the fused silica sample cuvette. In contrast, for both compounds, the low-frequency vibrational activities (<400 cm−1) observed upon resonant excitation (blue spectra, Fig. 3a, b) are not detected in the off-resonant experiments (red spectra, Fig. 3a, b). This observation is central and may be rationalized as follows. The ISRS mechanism at work here as well as spontaneous Raman scattering may both be described by a wavepacket formalism25,29,30 which introduces the propagation time τ of the wavepacket on the S1 PES between the two light field interactions that characterize a Raman transition. When τ is much shorter than a given vibrational period, no evolution occurs on S1, such that no Raman activity exists for this mode unless non-Condon effects (i.e., nuclear coordinate dependence of the electronic transition dipole moment) become significant. This conclusion holds for non-resonant Raman processes, where τ ~ h/ΔE with ΔE the detuning of the light field from resonance30 (here, with the 800-nm pump, ΔE ~ 1.5 eV and τ ~ 2.7 fs). The same conclusion also holds for resonant ISRS performed with a short enough pump pulse31, since in this case, τ is of order of the pump pulse duration (8 fs here). Therefore, we argue that for sufficiently low-frequency modes (i.e. oscillation periods much longer than 8 fs) the vibrational activity induced in S0 by ISRS is the same for both on- and off-resonance pulses (and results from non-Condon effects, if any). In fact, the analysis of the S1 reaction coordinate discussed below confirms that only a high-frequency stretching mode is activated within 8 fs, while the isomerization motion is activated at a later time.
Of central interest, here is the 80 cm−1 mode, which largely dominates the vibrational power spectrum of 1 in the resonant experiment only (2 orders of magnitude more intense than the 1572 cm−1 mode; notice the break in vertical scale in Fig. 3a, b). This mode actually corresponds to the low-frequency oscillation readily observed in 1 in Fig. 2e, g up to the 1 ps time scale, i.e., after the impulsive S1 decay as also confirmed by the analysis in Fig. 3c. In previous TA experiments on 1 with a resonant, 80 fs, pump pulse, the same oscillation was also observed with similar amplitude relative to the overall TA signal, and attributed to a coherent nuclear motion in S015,16. The present comparison between on- and off-resonant excitation (with pulse durations now much shorter than the ca. 400 fs period of the vibrational mode) demonstrates that the 80 cm−1 oscillation observed in 1 is not due to ISRS, but results from the reactive motion of the population initially promoted to S1. As a corollary, the vibrational coherence initiated on S1 along this mode is preserved upon decay to S0. Remarkably, in E-2, the 80 cm−1 mode is not detected. Instead an intense vibrational activity is observed at 232 cm−1. However, it is quenched upon decay to S0 as illustrated in Fig. 3d meaning that this is the signature of an S1 vibrational coherence which is not transferred to S0.
Quantum chemical modeling and mechanistic interpretation
The above experimental data lead us to the following conclusions: (i) the S0 80 cm−1 mode of compound 1 is activated exclusively via S1 coherent nuclear motion and the coherence is preserved upon impulsive decay through the CInt. (ii) The removal of the methyl group on C5 quenches the impulsive S1 decay as well as the signatures of vibrational coherence spanning both the S1 and S0 PESs. We now provide a mechanistic interpretation of these points. Firstly, both crystallographic (see Supplementary Figs 1 and 2) and computed room-temperature structures in methanol solution (see Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, and Supplementary Figs 3–5) show that the reactive C1ʹ=C4 bond is pre-twisted in Z-1 but substantially planar in E-2, as illustrated in Fig 4a, b. Secondly, the nuclear motion initiated in the spectroscopically allowed S1 state of Z-1 and E-2 is dramatically different. Indeed, as displayed in Fig. 4c, the energy profiles along the FC trajectory of Z-1 show that, similar to 11-cis PSBR in Rh11, the system evolves along a steep S1 PES reaching a Cint rapidly. More precisely, the vibrational wavepacket, whose center is assumed to move along the FC trajectory (see Methods section), would decay along a segment of the intersection space containing an infinite number of Cint’s32. In contrast with Z-1, E-2 shows, after a fast initial relaxation, a progression along flat and quasi-degenerate PESs consistently with an ineffective stretching-torsion coupling (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Figs 6–8). This behavior is consistent with the S1/S2 crossing detected along the PES for E-2 but not for Z-1 (see Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Figs 6 and 7). The same electronic effect was documented in a comparative study of Rh and microbial rhodopsins33, where the longer S1 lifetime of microbial rhodopsins is attributed to a crossing and re-crossing of nearly degenerate S1 and S2 states. It is thus apparent that the steric hindrance and the pre-twisting introduced by the C5-substituent induce the following: (i) a dominating Z configuration in S0 and (ii) a separation of the S1, S2 and S3 states. Also, a charge transfer character analog to the visual pigment is observed in Z-1, whereas in E-2 the intertwining S1, S2 and S3 states produces an oscillating electronic character modulated by the ethylenic stretch (see Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 6).
The analogy between synthetic and biological systems can also be extended to the S1 reaction coordinate. According to our calculations (see Fig. 4c, d bottom panels as well as Supplementary Figs 8 and 9), within the first 10 fs, only a high-frequency stretching mode is activated. Then, in 1 only, large out-of-plane ring deformations coupled to the central bond twisting are activated, which result in the rotation of the pyrrolinium ring relative to the indanone moiety. Such a coordinate is responsible for the effective breaking of the π-bond at the electronic level and parallels the one documented for Rh12. More specifically, the NAIP C1′=C4 twisting is straightforwardly associated with the C11=C12 twisting of the Rh chromophore, while the NAIP five-membered ring inversions, i.e., C2′ and C3 carbon-out-of-plane motions, mimic the hydrogen-out-of-plane motions of the HC11=C12H moiety of the Rh chromophore (Fig. 1a, b). The reaction coordinate will continue after decay to S016, leading to the coherent population of the prominent 80 cm−1 mode demonstrated here. Whether or not vibrational coherence is also preserved along the ring inversion motions remains speculative, since the corresponding sign of vibrational activity, expected in the 200–350 cm−1 range (also not activated in the off-resonance experiments), is possibly activated by the S1 motion in 1, but remains close to the noise level in the present experiment (Fig. 3c).
Discussion
In conclusion, by using vibrational coherence spectroscopy and quantum chemical simulations, we have shown that the S1 force field of Z-1 triggers a ballistic reactive motion towards the CInt and decay to S0. In a statistical ensemble of molecules in solution at room temperature, the observation of vibrational coherence in the photoproduct requires a degree of synchronization between all decay events in the ensemble, which demonstrates the ballistic motion and indicates that such motion is poorly affected by the initial nuclear velocities at ambient temperature. In contrast, E-2 experiences a more diffusive motion towards the CInt. The corresponding loss of synchronization would then explain the observed loss of ensemble coherence. This interpretation leads to the hypothesis that while Z-1 replicates the coherent dynamics that controls the Rh photochemistry, such a regime is not present in E-2, demonstrating that the observed biomimetic behavior can be switched off. Furthermore, the documented Z-1 and E-2 contrasting regimes (Fig. 5) provide a parallel between molecular switches and rhodopsin photoreceptors shedding new light on the mechanism by which Rh itself may optimize its photoisomerization.
Apart from the two seminal examples of vibrationally coherent triiodide photodissociation34 and Rh photoisomerization6, unambiguous observation of reaction-induced vibrational coherences were reported in other photoreactions such as e.g., ultrafast low- to high-spin transition in an iron II molecular complex35 or ring-opening in a molecular dyad36. However, in the latter two cases, the vibrational coherence was interpreted as being transferred to low-frequency modes not directly related to the reaction coordinate. Here we demonstrate that the onset (i.e., turning on or off) of a vibrationally coherent reactive motion can be induced via chemical modification and change in equilibrium geometry. This provides the opportunity to precisely control the decay event and, likely, to increase the presently low photoproduct quantum yield of NAIPs (Φ = 0.20%)13,14 or other retinal derivatives. Indeed, as previously proposed12, the conservation of a precise phase relationship between the HOOP and C11=C12 twisting modes of Rh would be responsible for its high Φ value (Φ = 67%)5. Thus, assuming a biomimetic behavior, a coherent motion would be a pre-requisite for achieving the optimal phase relationship between the C1′=C4 twisting and five-membered ring inversion in NAIPs and, in turn, for improving their photoisomerization efficiency. Notice, that this scenario is in contrast with the previous suggestion that Φ would correlate monotonously with the reaction speed according to the Landau-Zener model6,17,37. Finally, the control, via a chemical modification, of geometric and electronic effects appears a valid general strategy for coherently populating the torsional motion of other C=C isomerizing compounds.
Methods
Experimental
Compounds 1 or 2 were synthesized as previously reported13,26. The isomer content of the samples in the dark at room temperature was determined to be >97% Z for 1 and 95% E for 2, by prior 1H-NMR spectroscopy in deuterated methanol.
Vibrational coherence spectroscopy is performed by recording TA data with an experimental set-up described in detail in ref. 18. In short, we use a 1 kHz amplified Ti:Sa laser system delivering 3 mJ, 40 fs, 800 nm pulses. About 1 mJ of the fundamental pulse is injected in a neon-filled hollow fiber (Imperial College Consultants) where non-linear, guided propagation induces spectral broadening and generates the structured, red to IR spectrum displayed in Fig. 1d. Subsequent pulse compression using chirped mirrors results in a ~0.5 mJ, 6 fs pulse used for off-resonant excitation. Type II sum frequency generation of this 6 fs pulse with the fundamental 800 nm pulse generates the 45-nm broad pulse centered at 400 nm and used for resonant excitation. The FWHM duration of the latter blue pulse is measured to be 8.5 fs by implementing 2D spectral shearing interferometry (2DSI)38,39. Before TA experiments, the duration of either pump pulse is optimized directly in the sample by fine tuning group velocity dispersion with a pair of fused silica wedges (in combination with the chirped mirrors) so as to generate a white light supercontinuum in the solvent (methanol) with minimum pump intensity. Then the pump intensity is further reduced to 50 nJ per pulse to perform the actual experiments on the compounds.
As a probe pulse for TA spectroscopy we use a chirped, white light supercontinuum generated in CaF2. Half the intensity of this pulse is used as a reference beam. Both probe and reference spectra are acquired with a prism spectrometer equipped with two CCD cameras operated at a 1-kHz acquisition frequency (commercial acquisition system by Entwicklungsbüro G. Stresing, Berlin). The reference spectrum is used to normalize the probe spectrum. Pump and probe beams are focused and overlapped in the liquid sample. The pump beam is chopped at 500 Hz, such that two successive probe spectra are used to compute the pump-induced absorption change, i.e., TA spectrum, of the sample. A 500-μm-travel piezoelectric transducer (PT) on the pump beam optical path is continuously oscillating at a 0.5-Hz period to scan the pump-probe delay. The instantaneous PT position is acquired in synchronicity with probe and reference spectra at 1 kHz, which allows us to assign a specific pump-probe delay to each probe spectrum. The TA experiments are performed on 1.3 mM MeOH solutions of compounds 1 or 2 circulated with a peristaltic pump in a 0.2 mm-thick flow cell having 0.2-mm-thick fused silica windows (Hellma).
Before global fitting and fast Fourier transformation (FFT) of the residuals, the TA data sets are processed to correct for wavelength dependence of the time origin, induced by the chirp in the white light probe pulse. The signal recorded in the pure solvent is used to characterize the chirp for this purpose. The data at time delays shorter than 0.1 ps are disregarded in the analysis (global fit and FFT) because they are dominated by the pump-probe cross-modulation signal generated upon coherent interaction of both beams with the solvent. The oscillations (Fig. 2g, h) are most pronounced in the 350–470 nm probing window, resonant with the reactant (S0), excited state (S1), and photoproduct (S0) absorptions.
Computational
The 300 K Boltzmann distribution of Z-1 and E-2 in methanol has been simulated by combining40 the Average Solvent Electrostatic Configuration (ASEC) model41 and the free energy gradient method proposed by Nagaoka et al.42. A representative Franck-Condon structure has then been obtained by energy minimization of the ASEC snapshot with the excitation energy closest to the average (Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, and Supplementary Figs 3–543.
Excited state PES mapping (see Supplementary Fig. 6) and trajectory calculations have been performed using the CASPT2//CASSCF(12,11)/6-31G*/Amber quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics protocol available through the MOLCAS-Tinker interface44,45. The results of Fig. 4 are confirmed at the XMCQDPT2 level (Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Fig. 7). The FC trajectories of 1 and 2, i.e., trajectories that start from S0 equilibrium geometries with zero initial velocities, are released from the computationally assigned spectroscopic state (see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 5). As argued for other rhodopsin-like model compounds46,47, and consistently with the PES scans (Supplementary Fig. 6), FC trajectories are assumed to represent the initial (i.e., within few hundred femtoseconds) excited state motion of the center of the vibrational wavepacket.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche for support via grant No. ANR-11-JS04-010-01 “IPQCS”, the “Investissement d’Avenir” program: Labex NIE ANR-11-LABX-0058_NIE, Labex CSC ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC, Equipex UNION ANR-10-EQPX-52-01, the Région Alsace (Contrat doctoral, No. 607-12-C31), the Université de Strasbourg for a USIAS Fellowship, the NSF Grant No. CHE-1710191, and the Italian MIUR for grant PRIN 2015. We acknowledge the Ohio Supercomputer Center, the Mésocentre of the Université de Strasbourg and CINECA for granted computer time.
Author contributions
M.G. and J.L. built the experimental set-up. M.G., D.A and J.L. acquired and analyzed the data. M.P. and S.F. synthesized the compounds. M.M. and Y.O. carried out the computational work. J.L., S.H. and M.O. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-017-02668-w.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Massimo Olivucci, Email: molivuc@bgsu.edu.
Jérémie Léonard, Email: Jeremie.Leonard@ipcms.unistra.fr.
References
- 1.Scholes GD, Fleming GR, Olaya-Castro A, van Grondelle R. Lessons from nature about solar light harvesting. Nat. Chem. 2011;3:763–774. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Christensson N, Kauffmann HF, Pullerits T, Mančal T. Origin of long-lived coherences in light-harvesting complexes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2012;116:7449–7454. doi: 10.1021/jp304649c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scholes GD, et al. Using coherence to enhance function in chemical and biophysical systems. Nature. 2017;543:647–656. doi: 10.1038/nature21425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schoenlein R, Peteanu L, Mathies R, Shank C. The first step in vision: femtosecond isomerization of rhodopsin. Science. 1991;254:412–415. doi: 10.1126/science.1925597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dartnall HJA. The photosensitivities of visual pigments in the presence of hydroxylamine. Vision. Res. 1968;8:339–358. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90104-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang Q, Schoenlein RW, Peteanu LA, Mathies RA, Shank CV. Vibrationally coherent photochemistry in the femtosecond primary event of vision. Science. 1994;266:422–424. doi: 10.1126/science.7939680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Polli D, et al. Conical intersection dynamics of the primary photoisomerization event in vision. Nature. 2010;467:440–U88. doi: 10.1038/nature09346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johnson PJM, et al. Local vibrational coherences drive the primary photochemistry of vision. Nat. Chem. 2015;7:980–986. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schnedermann C, Liebel M, Kukura P. Mode-specificity of vibrationally coherent internal conversion in rhodopsin during the primary visual event. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:2886–2891. doi: 10.1021/ja508941k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.González-Luque R, et al. Computational evidence in favor of a two-state, two-mode model of the retinal chromophore photoisomerization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2000;97:9379–9384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.17.9379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Frutos LM, Andruniow T, Santoro F, Ferre N, Olivucci M. Tracking the excited-state time evolution of the visual pigment with multiconfigurational quantum chemistry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:7764–7769. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701732104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schapiro I, et al. The Ultrafast photoisomerizations of rhodopsin and bathorhodopsin are modulated by bond length alternation and HOOP driven electronic effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:3354–3364. doi: 10.1021/ja1056196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lumento F, et al. Quantum chemical modeling and preparation of a biomimetic photochemical switch. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:414–420. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sinicropi A, et al. An artificial molecular switch that mimics the visual pigment and completes its photocycle in picoseconds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2008;105:17642–17647. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802376105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Briand J, et al. Coherent ultrafast torsional motion and isomerization of a biomimetic dipolar photoswitch. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010;12:3178–3187. doi: 10.1039/b918603d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Léonard J, et al. Mechanistic origin of the vibrational coherence accompanying the photoreaction of biomimetic molecular switches. Chem. A Eur. J. 2012;18:15296–15304. doi: 10.1002/chem.201201430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cheminal A, et al. 100 fs photo-isomerization with vibrational coherences but low quantum yield in Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17:25429–25439. doi: 10.1039/C5CP04353K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gueye M, Nillon J, Crégut O, Léonard J. Broadband UV-Vis vibrational coherence spectrometer based on a hollow fiber compressor. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2016;87:093109. doi: 10.1063/1.4962699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liebel M, Schnedermann C, Wende T, Kukura P. Principles and Applications of Broadband Impulsive Vibrational Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2015;119:9506–9517. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b05948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chesnoy J, Mokhtari A. Resonant impulsive-stimulated Raman scattering on malachite green. Phys. Rev. A. 1988;38:3566–3576. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ruhman S, Joly AG, Nelson KA. Coherent molecular vibrational motion observed in the time domain through impulsive stimulated Raman scattering. Quantum Electron., IEEE J. 1988;24:460–469. doi: 10.1109/3.146. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fragnito HL, Bigot JY, Becker PC, Shank CV. Evolution of the vibronic absorption spectrum in a molecule following impulsive excitation with a 6 fs optical pulse. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989;160:101–104. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(89)87564-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pollard WT, Lee SY, Mathies RA. Wave packet theory of dynamic absorption spectra in femtosecond pump–probe experiments. J. Chem. Phys. 1990;92:4012–4029. doi: 10.1063/1.457815. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dexheimer SL, et al. Femtosecond impulsive excitation of nonstationary vibrational states in bacteriorhodopsin. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992;188:61–66. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(92)85089-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dhar L, Rogers JA, Nelson KA. Time-resolved vibrational spectroscopy in the impulsive limit. Chem. Rev. 1994;94:157–193. doi: 10.1021/cr00025a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dunkelberger AD, et al. Photoisomerization and relaxation dynamics of a structurally modified biomimetic photoswitch. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2012;116:3527–3533. doi: 10.1021/jp300153a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Paolino M, et al. Design, synthesis, and dynamics of a green fluorescent protein fluorophore mimic with an ultrafast switching function. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:9807–9825. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b10812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schapiro I, et al. Initial excited-state dynamics of an N-alkylated indanylidene–pyrroline (NAIP) rhodopsin analog. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2014;118:12243–12250. doi: 10.1021/jp508060z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pollard WT, Mathies RA. Analysis of femtosecond dynamic absorption spectra of nonstationary states. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1992;43:497–523. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pc.43.100192.002433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee SY, Heller EJ. Time-dependent theory of Raman scattering. J. Chem. Phys. 1979;71:4777–4788. doi: 10.1063/1.438316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tanimura Y, Mukamel S. Temperature dependence and non-Condon effects in pump–probe spectroscopy in the condensed phase. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 1993;10:2263–2268. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.10.002263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gozem S, et al. Mapping the excited state potential energy surface of a retinal chromophore model with multireference and equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013;9:4495–4506. doi: 10.1021/ct400460h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Luk HL, Melaccio F, Rinaldi S, Gozem S, Olivucci M. Molecular bases for the selection of the chromophore of animal rhodopsins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2015;112:15297–15302. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510262112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Banin U, Ruhman S. Ultrafast photodissociation of I3. Coherent photochemistry in solution. J. Chem. Phys. 1993;98:4391–4403. doi: 10.1063/1.465066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Consani C, et al. Vibrational coherences and relaxation in the high-spin state of aqueous [FeII(bpy)3]2+ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:7184–7187. doi: 10.1002/anie.200902728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schweighofer F, et al. Vibrational coherence transfer in an electronically decoupled molecular dyad. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:9368. doi: 10.1038/srep09368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bassolino G, et al. Synthetic control of retinal photochemistry and photophysics in solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:2650–2658. doi: 10.1021/ja4121814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Birge JR, Ell R, Kärtner FX. Two-dimensional spectral shearing interferometry for few-cycle pulse characterization. Opt. Lett. 2006;31:2063–2065. doi: 10.1364/OL.31.002063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Borrego-Varillas R, et al. Optimized ancillae generation for ultra-broadband two-dimensional spectral-shearing interferometry. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 2015;32:1851–1855. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.32.001851. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bistafa C, Georg HC, Canuto S. Combining ab initio multiconfigurational and Free Energy Gradient methods to study the π–π* excited state structure and properties of uracil in water. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2014;1040–1041:312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2014.04.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Coutinho, K., Rivelino, R., Georg, H. C. & Canuto, S. In: Solvation effects on molecules and biomolecules: Computational methods and applications Canuto, S., Ed. Vol. 6, pp 159-189 (Springer, London, 2008).
- 42.Hirao H, Nagae Y, Nagaoka M. Transition-state optimization by the free energy gradient method: Application to aqueous-phase Menshutkin reaction between ammonia and methyl chloride. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001;348:350–356. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)01131-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Orozco-Gonzalez Y, et al. An Average Solvent Electrostatic Configuration Protocol for Qm/mm Free Energy Optimization: Implementation and Application to Rhodopsin Systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017;13:6391–6404. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Melaccio F, Olivucci M, Lindh R, Ferré N. Unique QM/MM potential energy surface exploration using microiterations. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2011;111:3339–3346. doi: 10.1002/qua.23067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Aquilante F, et al. Molcas 8: new capabilities for multiconfigurational quantum chemical calculations across the periodic table. J. Comput. Chem. 2016;37:506–541. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gozem S, et al. Shape of multireference, equation-of-motion coupled-cluster, and density functional theory potential energy surfaces at a conical intersection. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014;10:3074–3084. doi: 10.1021/ct500154k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Manathunga M, et al. Probing the photodynamics of rhodopsins with reduced retinal chromophores. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016;12:839–850. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.