Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular Medicine Reports logoLink to Molecular Medicine Reports
. 2017 Oct 20;17(1):51–58. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7846

Salidroside could enhance the cytotoxic effect of L-OHP on colorectal cancer cells

Xiaoming Shi 1,✉, Wei Zhao 1, Yongbin Yang 1, Shengchun Wu 1, Bonan Lv 1
PMCID: PMC5780144  PMID: 29115408

Abstract

Evidence has suggested that salidroside inhibits the proliferation and invasion of renal clear cell, lung, breast, and colon cancer. However, effect of salidroside on colorectal cancer (CRC) cells against oxaliplatin (L-OHP) resistance remains unclear. In the present study, the CRC HT-29 cell line and L-OHP resistance HT-29/L-OHP cell line were used to evaluate the effect, and mechanism of salidroside on L-OHP resistance. The results demonstrated that the activity of HT-29 cells was lower compared with that of HT-29/L-OHP cells following L-OHP intervention, and was accompanied with varied expression levels of drug resistant proteins. The combination of salidroside and L-OHP weakened cell activity significantly compared single utilization. Compared with the control group, salidroside intervention resulted in a higher percentage of HT-29/L-OHP cells in the G0/G1 stage, and reduced percentage in the G2/M stage, but no significant variation in the S stage. The HT-29/L-OHP cells exhibited increased apoptosis rates and caspase-3 activity, but decreased metastatic, and invasive abilities following salidroside intervention. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis detected variations in the expression levels of associated genes in HT-29/L-OHP cells following salidroside intervention. In all, the results of the present study revealed that salidroside is able to decrease the activity and invasive capacity of HT-29/L-OHP cells, and treatment with salidroside is associated with increased apoptosis of cancer cells through the regulation of certain genes.

Keywords: colorectal cancer, salidroside, drug resistance, L-OHP, chemosensitivity in vitro

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become a fatal threat with the 4th highest morbidity and 5th highest mortality in all cancers (1), and incidence of CRC also increased dramatically in China (2,3). Due to difficulty of detecting this disease at early stage, the majority of patients were diagnosed as being at the progressive stage at the first visit to hospital. Although the chemotherapy, one of the main treatments for CRC, is being updated, the outcome remains unsatisfactory and results in poor prognosis (4–10). Cancer cells can develop resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs, such as oxaliplatin (L-OHP), and this has been demonstrated as the crucial factor of chemotherapy failure (11–13). Given this fact, reversing the drug resistance of cancer cells has been regarded as a practical method for enhancing chemotherapy efficacy and improving the prognosis of patients.

Salidroside is the active ingredient of Rhodiolae, a plant has been used in the Far East and Russia traditional medicine for a variety of diseases (14–16). Evidence has demonstrated that salidroside can inhibit the proliferation and invasion of abnormal cells in renal clear cell cancer (17), lung cancer (18), breast cancer (19), and colon cancer (20). However, the effect of salidroside on CRC cells against L-OHP resistance remains unclear.

In present study, we assessed the effect of salidroside on the activity, cycle and apoptosis of L-OHP resistance CRC cells in vitro. We also detected the expression variation of drug-resistant genes before and after salidroside intervention, in terms of MRP-1, P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin, Bcl-2 and Bax, and also investigated the molecular mechanism and potential clinical value of salidroside.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cell culture

CRC cell line HT-29 was obtained from the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). L-OHP-resistant CRC line HT-29/L-OHP was cultivated and identified by our research team using increased concentration, which reached a resistant index (RI) of 4.26 for L-OHP. HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP were cultivated under 5% CO2 and 37°C with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), which contains 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Trypsin (0.25%) (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with 0.02% EDTA was used for the digestive transfer. L-OHP (1.5 µg/ml) was added into the substrate of HT-29/L-OHP to maintain the drug-resistant phenotype until 2 weeks before the experiment.

Detection of cell activity with SRB assay

Single-cell suspension was prepared and adjusted to 106/ml whereas salidroside (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and L-OHP (Laboratoires Thissen, Belgium) were added after the cell attachment. Cell fixation was conducted using 50% TCA (50 µl) under 4°C for 1 h which was followed by elution (5 times) using ultrapure water and air drying. 100 µl sulphorhodamine B (SRB; Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) were added to each well for 10 min in dark place (25°C) and then discarded. The optical density (OD) value was detected using microplate reader under 545 nm. The cell activity was presented as the OD ratio which is defined as OD ratio in experimental group/OD ration in control groups. This experiment was repeated for 3 times.

Detection of the expressions of targeted proteins

After quantification (ABC assay), 60 µg proteins from specimens in each group was purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and then transferred to PVDF membrane for overnight (4°C) after adding first antibody or β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Elution was performed using TBST for 3 times and then the second antibody marked by horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was added. After incubation under 25°C for 1 h, chemiluminescence was applied for coloration following by stripe scanning.

Detection of cell cycle

After centrifugation, cells were fixed using 70% alcohol under 4°C. The cell cycle was determined by flow cytometry (FCM; Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) with 100 µl cell suspension (1×106/ml) which was pretreated by PBS (containing 50 µg/ml propidium iodide, 100 µg/ml RNase A and 0.2% Triton X-100) under 4°C for 30 min in dark.

Detection of cell apoptosis

The cell apoptosis rate was detected by Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) detection kit (Jiamei North Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) with 100 µl cell suspension (1×106/ml) which was pretreated using 5 µl Annexin V-FITC and 10 µl PI under 25°C for 15 min in dark.

Cell scratch assay

Single-cell suspension was adjusted to 5×104/ml and then transferred to the 24-well plate for cultivating during a period of 48 h. After discarding DMEM, scratching was conducted using the 200 µl tips which was followed by 24-h culture using serum-free medium. Wound healing was inspected under microscope after washing out the scratched cells. The distance and ratio of cell migration were calculated.

Transwell chamber assay

The pore size of the polycarbonate membrane of the Transwell chamber is 8 µm where the upper chamber was membraned using 100 µl Matrigel under ultraviolet radiation for 2 h. Cells were inoculated to the 6-well plate for 1×106/ml per well and intervened for 24 h when growing up to 60–70%. Single-cell suspension (200 µl) was inoculated to the upper chamber and then placed to the 24-well plate, while the lower chamber was cultivated using DMEM (containing 10% FCS). After 24 h culture, the Matrigel and cells in the upper chamber were removed using aseptic swab. The polycarbonate membrane was fixed using methanol for 10 min and then colored by crystal violet. Cell counts were calculated by inspecting 5 random fields under high magnification. The inhibition rate of invasion was defined as (1 – counts of invasive cells in experimental group/counts of invasive cells in control group) × 100%. The procedure was repeated for 3 times.

Real-time PCR assay

Total RNA of cells were extracted and retransformed into cDNA, which was then amplified by PCR for detecting the mRNA expressions of targeted molecules. The primers are shown in Table I. The amplified results were identified using agarose gel electrophoresis. The results of fluorogenic quantitative PCR was calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method with β-actin working as internal reference.

Table I.

Primer sequences for quantitative real-time PCR.

Genes Forward primer (5′-3′) Reverse primer (5′-3′)
MRP-1 CATCAGCAGGCACCACAAC TTCCAGGTCTCCTCCTTCTTG
MDR1 GAATGTTCAGTGGCTCCGAG ACAATCTCTTCCTGTGACACC
LOXL2 CACCCACTATGACCTGCTGA TCTTCTGGATGTCTCCTTCACA
Survivin GCCAGATTTGAATCGCGGGA GCAGTGGATGAAGCCAGCCT
Livin TCCACAGTGTGCAGGAGACT ACGGCACAAAGACGATGGAC
Bcl-2 TGTGTGGAGAGCGTCAACC TGGATCCAGGTGTGCAGGT
Bax TTTCTGACGGCAACTTCAAC AGTCCAATGTCCAGCCCAT
GAPDH GACCCCTTCATTGACCTCAAC CGCTCCTGGAAGATGGTGAT
Open in a new tab

Detection of caspase-3 activity

N-acetyl-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-7-amino-4-trifluorom ethylcoumarin (Ac-DEVD-AFC; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) was utilized to detect the activity of caspase-3, caspase-3 analysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and 10 mM DTT) was added into 15 µl protein extracts. After incubation under 37°C for 2 h, specimens were treated using 15 µl Ac-DEVD-AFC solution (2 mM) and then detected by ELIASA reader under 505 nm.

Statistical analysis

Mean ± SD was recorded to demonstrate the results of cell activity, western blot analysis, cell cycle, apoptosis, invasion/metastasis, values of fluorogenic quantitative PCR test and caspase-3 activity. The heterogeneities between different groups were detected using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett's test by SPSS 19.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

The effect of L-OHP on HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP cells

To evaluate the effect of L-OHP on HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP cells, different dosages of L-OHP were applied for intervention and the cell activity was detected by SRB assay. As shown in Fig. 1, the activity of HT-29 was less obvious than HT-29/L-OHP after the intervention (P<0.05), suggesting a stronger resistance of HT-29/L-OHP against L-OHP, and 0.5 µg/ml L-OHP was selected for further studies.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Sensitivity of HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP cells to L-OHP. HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP cells were treatment with different dosages of L-OHP for 48 h, and the activity of cells were illustrated as Fig. 1, which showed that activity of HT-29 was less obvious than HT-29/L-OHP after the intervention (P<0.05). *P<0.05 vs. HT-29 cells.

The expressions of drug-resistant proteins in HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP cells

Western blot analysis was applied to examine the expressions of drug-resistant proteins in HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP cells, including MRP-1, P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin, Bcl-2 and Bax proteins. The result showed higher expressions of MRP-1, P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin and Bcl-2 but lower expression of Bax in HT-29 than in HT-29/L-OHP (P<0.01) (Fig. 2), which suggested the expression difference of drug-resistant genes between the two cell lines may contribute to the stronger tolerance of HT-29/L-OHP than HT-29 towards L-OHP. Therefore, HT-29/L-OHP was selected to assess the impacts of salidroside in the following experiments.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Expression of MRP-1, P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin, Bcl-2 and Bax proteins in HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP cells. HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP cells were subjected to western blot analysis to detect the expression of MRP-1, P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin, Bcl-2 and Bax proteins. Gel electrophoresis map was shown in (A) and relative protein levels were shown in (B). *P<0.05 vs. HT-29 cells.

The effect of salidroside on the cell activity of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells

The molecular formula of salidroside was shown as Fig. 3A. To explore the effect of salidroside on the cell activity of HT-29/L-OHP cells, different dosages of salidroside were imposed on HT-29 and HT-29/L-OHP cells. Results showed that either of increasing dosage and longer application of salidroside decreased cell activity in HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells (Fig. 3B and C), based on which the accurate dosage and treatment period (48 h) of salidroside were determined. The cell activity decreased further with the combined use of salidroside and L-OHP (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Effect of salidroside on the cell activity of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells. Image of salidroside molecular structure was shown as (A). Effect of salidroside with different concentrations was illustrated as (B). Results of (C) suggested that salidroside could inhibit the activity of HT-29/L-OHP cells with dose- and time-dependent manner, and combination of salidroside and L-OHP could inhibit activity of HT-29/L-OHP cells more significantly, which was illustrated in (D). *P<0.05 vs. 0 µg/ml in (B); *P<0.05 vs. 10 µg/ml, #P<0.05 vs. 40 µg/ml in (C); *P<0.05 vs. blank group, #P<0.05 vs. group 1, □P<0.05 vs. group 2, and ▲P<0.05 vs. group 3 in (D). Group 1 (salidroside 10 µg/ml); group 2 (salidroside 10 µg/ml combined with L-OHP); group 3 (salidroside 80 µg/ml); and group 4 (salidroside 80 µg/ml combined with L-OHP).

The effect of salidroside on the cell cycle of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells

In this study, concentration of 80 µg/ml salidroside with 48 h treatment was applied to evaluate the effect of salidroside on the cell cycle of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells. The result of FCM was shown in Fig. 4A. Compared with control group, the intervention resulted in more HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells arrested in G0/G1 stage, less in G2/M stage (P<0.01), whereas almost the same proportion in S stage (Fig. 4B), suggesting salidroside could inhibit the proliferation of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Cell cycle of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells in different groups. HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells treated with salidroside respectively showed variation of cell cycle, which was detected by FCM. Compared with control group, the intervention resulted in more HT-29/L-OHP or HT-29 cells arrested in G0/G1 stage, (P<0.01), and results of HT-29/L-OHP were shown in (A), results of HT-29 in (B). *P<0.01 vs. control group.

The effect of salidroside on apoptosis of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells

The effects of salidroside on the apoptosis of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells were detected under the same experimental dosage and time. The result of FCM was shown in Fig. 5A. In comparison with the control group, the apoptosis rate was higher in HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells after salidroside intervention (P<0.01) (Fig. 5B), suggesting that salidroside could promote the apoptosis of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Apoptosis rate of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells in different groups. HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells treated with salidroside showed variation of apoptosis rate with FCM detection. Compared with control group, the apoptosis rate was higher in both cell lines after salidroside intervention (P<0.01), and results of HT-29/L-OHP were shown in (A), results of HT-29 in (B). *P<0.01 vs. control group.

The effect of salidroside on the invasion and migration of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells

HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells were pretreated by 80 µg/ml salidroside for 48 h respectively, and then detected with scratch test to evaluate the cell migration activity and Transwell chamber assay to assess the cell invasion capacity. As shown in Fig. 6, the inhibition ratio and invasion descended in a dose-dependent manner after the intervention, indicating that salidroside could inhibit the invasion and migration of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

The effects of salidroside on migration and invasion of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells. HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells were intervened with salidroside, and then were subjected to scratch assay to detect cell migrating activity (A). Transwell chamber assay to detect cell invasion activity (B). *P<0.05 vs. control group.

The effect of salidroside on the expressions of drug-resistant genes and caspase-3 activity in HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells

To explore the molecular mechanism of salidroside on L-OHP resistance cells, the expressions of drug-resistant genes in HT-29/L-OHP were detected. The results indicated decreased expressions of MRP-1, MDR1/P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin and Bcl-2 but increased Bax in HT-29/L-OHP cells, compared with Control group (P<0.05) (Fig. 7A-C), which suggested that salidroside could strengthen the sensitivity of HT-29/L-OHP to chemotherapeutic drugs by regulating the expressions of drug-resistant genes. Our results suggested salidroside could inhibit the expressions of Survivin and Livin, two anti-apoptosis proteins that could affect the function of caspase-3. Results indicated that the activity of caspase-3 in HT-29/L-OHP also increased after the intervention, implying salidroside may exert by suppressing the expressions of Survivin and Livin and enhancing caspase-3 activity (Fig. 7D). HT-29 cells were also treated with salidroside, and then drug-resistant genes and caspase-3 activity were also tested. Results of salidroside on HT-29 cells were similar to those of salidroside on HT-29/L-OHP cells (Fig. 8).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Open in a new tab

Effect of salidroside on the expressions of MRP-1, MDR1/P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin, Bcl-2, Bax genes and caspase-3 activity in HT-29/L-OHP cells. HT-29/L-OHP cells were treated with salidroside, and then were subjected to real-time quantitative PCR and western blot analyses, to detect the mRNA or protein expression levels of MRP-1, MDR1/P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin, Bcl-2, Bax genes. Results showed that expressions of MRP-1, MDR1/P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin and Bcl-2 decreased but Bax increased in HT-29/L-OHP cells, which was illustrated in (A-C). Activity of caspase-3 in HT-29/L-OHP also increased after salidroside intervention, as shown in (D). *P<0.05 vs. control group.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Open in a new tab

Effect of salidroside on the expressions of MRP-1, MDR1/P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin, Bcl-2, Bax genes and caspase-3 activity in HT-29 cells. HT-29 cells were treated with salidroside, and then were subjected to real-time quantitative PCR and western blot analyses, to detect the mRNA or protein expression levels of MRP-1, MDR1/P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin, Bcl-2, Bax genes. Results showed that expressions of MRP-1, MDR1/P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin and Bcl-2 decreased but Bax increased in HT-29 cells, which was illustrated in (A-C). Activity of caspase-3 in HT-29 also increased after salidroside intervention, as shown in (D). *P<0.05 vs. control group.

Discussion

CRC is a common malignant digestive tract tumor in China, which is characterized by the dissatisfactory therapeutic efficacy and poor prognosis (21,22). Chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of CRC, which, however, frequently fails and results in recurrence and metastasis due to the drug resistance of CRC cells (23,24). L-OHP, a 3rd generation platinum-based anticancer drug, is the primary component in the first-line chemotherapy for CRC. The cytotoxic and anti-cancer effect of L-OHP is to inhibiting DNA synthesis in the cancer cells by creating crosslink within and between DNA chains (25,26). Although the effect of L-OHP is better than DDP, the resistance of CRC cells against L-OHP decreases the clinical outcomes (27,28). In this study, the cell activity of CRC cells was lower than L-OHP resistance CRC cells after L-OHP intervention, demonstrating the resistance of CRC cells to L-OHP (29). Therefore, a combination of innovative drugs and L-OHP may improve the effectiveness of chemotherapy.

Rhodiolae, a traditional medicinal plant, is widely used in Far East and Russia (15,16) for immunity improvement (30), anti-oxidation/cancer (31,32), cardiovascular protection (33), glycol-/lipid-metabolism enhancement and neuron protection (34,35). Salidroside is the active ingredient of Rhodiolae, which has obvious suppression on renal clear cell cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer (17–19). Recent evidence has demonstrated that salidroside could inhibit the proliferation of CRC cells by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling. However, whether Rhodiolae can relieve the resistance of CRCs against L-OHP remains unclear. In this study, we observed higher sensitivity of CRC cells to L-OHP after salidroside intervention, suggesting the positive effect of salidroside on the resistance of CRC cells against L-OHP. The results indicated that salidroside can impede the transition of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells from G0/G1 stage to G2/M stage, whereas it also promotes the apoptosis and inhibits the invasion and migration of HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells. Our results revealed multiple pathways of salidroside's suppression on HT-29/L-OHP cells and suggested the combined use of salidroside in the L-OHP oriented chemotherapy can improve the clinical effect.

Previous studies revealed the participations of agent pump protein, detoxification pathway and DNA repair in the L-OHP resistance (36–39). To explore the mechanism of salidroside on HT-29/L-OHP and HT-29 cells, we compared the expressions of MRP-1, P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin and Bcl-2 before and after salidroside intervention. MRP-1 and P-gp, located at the membrane of cancer cells, could pump chemotherapeutic drugs out via endoergic reaction (40,41). Recent study has demonstrated that LOXL2 can inhibit the diffusion of gemcitabine in the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (42). Survivin (43), Livin (44) and Bcl-2 could enhance the anti-apoptosis of cancer cells, while in contrast Bax can promote apoptosis. Therefore, the ratio of Bcl-2/Bax in the dimer composed by the two proteins determines the apoptosis capacity of cancer cells (45,46). In this study, we observed declines of MRP-1, MDR1/P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin and Bcl-2, whereas increasing expression of Bax after salidroside intervention, suggesting salidroside can relieve the resistance of CRC cells to L-OHP by regulating these drug-resistant genes. Results of salidroside on HT-29 cells were similar to those of salidroside on HT-29/L-OHP cells. However, more studies are needed to explore the interaction between specific molecules, and in further study we'll investigate effects of salidroside on other CRC cell lines.

In conclusion, our study revealed that salidroside could decrease the activity and invasion capacity of HT-29/ L-OHP, and treatment of salidroside related to apoptosis of cancer cells by regulating the expressions of related genes, possibly due to inhibiting the expressions of MRP-1, MDR1/P-gp, LOXL2, Survivin, Livin and Bcl-2, whereas promoting the expression of Bax genes. Therefore, we suggest the combined application of salidroside in the L-OHP oriented chemotherapy in order to improve the clinical efficacy for CRC patients. However, further researches are needed to confirm this conclusion via in vivo experiments and large-scale clinical studies.

References

  • 1.Favoriti P, Carbone G, Greco M, Pirozzi F, Pirozzi RE, Corcione F. Worldwide burden of colorectal cancer: A review. Updates Surg. 2016;68:7–11. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0359-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S. The incidence and mortality of major cancers in China, 2012. Chin J Cancer. 2016;35:73. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0137-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bode AM, Dong Z, Wang H. Cancer prevention and control: Alarming challenges in China. Natl Sci Rev. 2016;3:117–127. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwv054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rogowski W, Sulżyc-Bielicka V. Optimal duration of a first-line palliative chemotherapy in disseminated colorectal cancer-a review of the literature from a developing country perspective. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2016;20:210–214. doi: 10.5114/wo.2016.61561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhao L, Liu R, Zhang Z, Li T, Li F, Liu H, Li G. Oxaliplatin/fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:763–772. doi: 10.1111/codi.13381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Betge J, Barat A, Murphy V, Hielscher T, Van Grieken NC, Belle S, Zhan T, Härtel N, Kripp M, Bacon O, et al. Outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with combination bevacizumab therapy: A pooled retrospective analysis of three european cohorts from the angiopredict initiative. Digestion. 2016;94:129–137. doi: 10.1159/000449412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Suzuki S, Shimazaki J, Morishita K, Koike N, Harada N, Hayashi T, Suzuki M. Efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin, bevacizumab and oral S-1 for advanced recurrent colorectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016;5:391–394. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang X, Chen Y, Hao L, Hou A, Chen X, Li Y, Wang R, Luo P, Ruan Z, Ou J, et al. Macrophages induce resistance to 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in colorectal cancer through the release of putrescine. Cancer Lett. 2016;381:305–313. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Garborg K. Colorectal cancer screening. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95:979–989. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.De Divitiis C, Nasti G, Montano M, Fisichella R, Iaffaioli RV, Berretta M. Prognostic and predictive response factors in colorectal cancer patients: Between hope and reality. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15049–15059. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang W, Liu J, Qi J, Zhang J, Zhu Q, Ma J, Qin C. Downregulation of RLIP76 is associated with vincristine resistance in human colorectal cancer HCT-8/VCR cells. Int J Oncol. 2016;49:1505–1512. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Oddo D, Sennott EM, Barault L, Valtorta E, Arena S, Cassingena A, Filiciotto G, Marzolla G, Elez E, van Geel RM, et al. Molecular landscape of acquired resistance to targeted therapy combinations in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4504–4515. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Z, Zhang L, Ni Z, Sun J, Gao H, Cheng Z, Xu J, Yin P. Resveratrol induces AMPK-dependent MDR1 inhibition in colorectal cancer HCT116/L-OHP cells by preventing activation of NF-κB signaling and suppressing cAMP-responsive element transcriptional activity. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:9499–9510. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3636-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li F, Tang H, Xiao F, Gong J, Peng Y, Meng X. Protective effect of salidroside from Rhodiolae radix on diabetes-induced oxidative stress in mice. Molecules. 2011;16:9912–9924. doi: 10.3390/molecules16129912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zheng KY, Guo AJ, Bi CW, Zhu KY, Chan GK, Fu Q, Xu SL, Zhan JY, Lau DT, Dong TT, et al. The extract of Rhodiolae Crenulatae Radix et Rhizoma induces the accumulation of HIF-1α via blocking the degradation pathway in cultured kidney fibroblasts. Planta Med. 2011;77:894–899. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1250627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li F, Xiao F, Gong J, Yu T. Applied orthogonal experiment design for the optimum microwave-assisted extraction conditions of polysaccharides from Rhodiolae radix. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2013;10:179–185. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v10i4.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lv C, Huang Y, Liu ZX, Yu D, Bai ZM. Salidroside reduces renal cell carcinoma proliferation by inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Cancer Biomark. 2016;17:41–47. doi: 10.3233/CBM-160615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang J, Li JZ, Lu AX, Zhang KF, Li BJ. Anticancer effect of salidroside on A549 lung cancer cells through inhibition of oxidative stress and phospho-p38 expression. Oncol Lett. 2014;7:1159–1164. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.1863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhao G, Shi A, Fan Z, Du Y. Salidroside inhibits the growth of human breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2015;33:2553–2560. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.3857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sun KX, Xia HW, Xia RL. Anticancer effect of salidroside on colon cancer through inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:615–621. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kraus S, Nabiochtchikov I, Shapira S, Arber N. Recent advances in personalized colorectal cancer research. Cancer Lett. 2014;347:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berge E, Thompson C, Messersmith W. Development of novel targeted agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011;10:266–278. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Temraz S, Mukherji D, Alameddine R, Shamseddine A. Methods of overcoming treatment resistance in colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;89:217–230. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bian Z, Feng Y, Xue Y, Hu Y, Wang Q, Zhou L, Liu Z, Zhang J, Yin Y, Gu B, Huang Z. Down-regulation of SNX1 predicts poor prognosis and contributes to drug resistance in colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:6619–6625. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3814-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suzuki S, Tanigawara Y. Forced expression of S100A10 reduces sensitivity to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cells. Proteome Sci. 2014;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-12-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Toki MI, Saif MW, Syrigos KN. Hypersensitivity reactions associated with oxaliplatin and their clinical management. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13:1545–1554. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2014.963551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bi J, Bai Z, Ma X, Song J, Guo Y, Zhao J, Yi X, Han S, Zhang Z. Txr1: An important factor in oxaliplatin resistance in gastric cancer. Med Oncol. 2014;31:807. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0807-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen CC, Chen LT, Tsou TC, Pan WY, Kuo CC, Liu JF, Yeh SC, Tsai FY, Hsieh HP, Chang JY. Combined modalities of resistance in an oxaliplatin-resistant human gastric cancer cell line with enhanced sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:334–344. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hu CJ, Wang B, Tang B, Chen BJ, Xiao YF, Qin Y, Yong X, Luo G, Zhang JW, Zhang D, et al. The FOXM1-induced resistance to oxaliplatin is partially mediated by its novel target gene Mcl-1 in gastric cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1849:290–299. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bocharova OA, Serebriakova RV, Bodrova NB. Preventive effect of Rhodiolae rosea in spontaneous liver carcinogenesis in a mice model of high-tumor strain. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk. 1994;5:41–43. (In Russian) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee OH, Kwon YI, Apostolidis E, Shetty K, Kim YC. Rhodiola-induced inhibition of adipogenesis involves antioxidant enzyme response associated with pentose phosphate pathway. Phytother Res. 2011;25:106–115. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bassa LM, Jacobs C, Gregory K, Henchey E, Ser-Dolansky J, Schneider SS. Rhodiola crenulata induces an early estrogenic response and reduces proliferation and tumorsphere formation over time in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Phytomedicine. 2016;23:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yu L, Qin Y, Wang Q, Zhang L, Liu Y, Wang T, Huang L, Wu L, Xiong H. The efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine, Rhodiola formulation in treating ischemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. 2014;22:814–825. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang J, Rong X, Li W, Yang Y, Yamahara J, Li Y. Rhodiola crenulata root ameliorates derangements of glucose and lipid metabolism in a rat model of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;142:782–788. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xiao L, Li H, Zhang J, Yang F, Huang A, Deng J, Liang M, Ma F, Hu M, Huang Z. Salidroside protects Caenorhabditis elegans neurons from polyglutamine-mediated toxicity by reducing oxidative stress. Molecules. 2014;19:7757–7769. doi: 10.3390/molecules19067757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Helmbach H, Kern MA, Rossmann E, Renz K, Kissel C, Gschwendt B, Schadendorf D. Drug resistance towards etoposide and cisplatin in human melanoma cells is associated with drug-dependent apoptosis deficiency. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118:923–932. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01786.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hunakova L, Gronesova P, Horvathova E, Chalupa I, Cholujova D, Duraj J, Sedlak J. Modulation of cisplatin sensitivity in human ovarian carcinoma A2780 and SKOV3 cell lines by sulforaphane. Toxicol Lett. 2014;230:479–486. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Murphy RF, Komlodi-Pasztor E, Robey R, Balis FM, Farrell NP, Fojo T. Retained platinum uptake and indifference to p53 status make novel transplatinum agents active in platinum-resistant cells compared to cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:963–973. doi: 10.4161/cc.11.5.19447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gourdier I, Del Rio M, Crabbé L, Candeil L, Copois V, Ychou M, Auffray C, Martineau P, Mechti N, Pommier Y, Pau B. Drug specific resistance to oxaliplatin is associated with apoptosis defect in a cellular model of colon carcinoma. FEBS Lett. 2002;529:232–236. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03347-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sui H, Fan ZZ, Li Q. Signal transduction pathways and transcriptional mechanisms of ABCB1/Pgp-mediated multiple drug resistance in human cancer cells. J Int Med Res. 2012;40:426–435. doi: 10.1177/147323001204000204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang Y, Liu L, Liu X, Zhang H, Liu J, Feng B, Shang Y, Zhou L, Wu K, Nie Y, et al. Shugoshin1 enhances multidrug resistance of gastric cancer cells by regulating MRP1, Bcl-2 and Bax genes. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:2205–2214. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0758-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Le Calvé B, Griveau A, Vindrieux D, Maréchal R, Wiel C, Svrcek M, Gout J, Azzi L, Payen L, Cros J, et al. Lysyl oxidase family activity promotes resistance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to chemotherapy by limiting the intratumoral anticancer drug distribution. Oncotarget. 2016;7:32100–32112. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Véquaud E, Desplanques G, Jézéquel P, Juin P, Barillé-Nion S. Survivin contributes to DNA repair by homologous recombination in breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;155:53–63. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3657-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hsieh CH, Lin YJ, Wu CP, Lee HT, Shyu WC, Wang CC. Livin contributes to tumor hypoxia-induced resistance to cytotoxic therapies in glioblastoma multiforme. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:460–470. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eimani Golestani B, Sanati MH, Houshmand M, Ataei M, Akbarian F, Shakhssalim N. Expression and prognostic significance of bcl-2 and bax in the progression and clinical outcome of transitional bladder cell carcinoma. Cell J. 2014;15:356–363. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wu S, Liu B, Zhang Q, Liu J, Zhou W, Wang C, Li M, Bao S, Zhu R. Dihydromyricetin reduced Bcl-2 expression via p53 in Human Hepatoma HepG2 Cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Medicine Reports are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES