Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus biofilms pose a serious clinical threat as reservoirs for persistent infections. Despite this clinical significance, the composition and mechanism of formation of S. aureus biofilms are unknown. To address these problems, we used solid-state NMR to examine S. aureus (SA113), a strong biofilm-forming strain. We labeled whole cells and cell walls of planktonic cells, young biofilms formed for 12-24 hours after stationary phase, and more mature biofilms formed for up to 60 hours after stationary phase. All samples were labeled either by (i) [15N]glycine and l- [1-13C]threonine, or in separate experiments, by (ii) l-[2-13C,15N]leucine. We then measured 13C-15N direct bonds by C{N} rotational-echo double resonance (REDOR). The increase in peptidoglycan stems that have bridges connected to a surface protein was determined directly by a cell-wall double difference (biofilm REDOR difference minus planktonic REDOR difference). This procedure eliminates errors arising from differences in 15N isotopic enrichments and from the routing of 13C label from threonine degradation to glycine. For both planktonic cells and the mature biofilm, 20% of pentaglycyl bridges are not cross-linked and are potential surface-protein attachment sites. None of these sites has a surface protein attached in the planktonic cells, but one-fourth have a surface protein attached in the mature biofilm. Moreover, the leucine-label shows that the concentration of β-strands in leucine-rich regions doubles in the mature biofilm. Thus, a primary event in establishing a S. aureus biofilm is extensive decoration of the cell surface with surface proteins that are linked covalently to the cell wall and promote cell-cell adhesion.
Keywords: bacterial virulence, cell walls, peptidoglycan, cross-linking, stable isotopes, solid-state NMR, REDOR
Graphical abstract
1. Introduction
The inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and the sterilization of mature biofilms are of great clinical importance. An estimated 50-70% of catheter-related infections, 40-50% prosthetic cardiac-valve infections, and 20-50% of joint-replacement infections are caused by staphylococci biofilms [1], of which S. aureus is the leading pathogen. S. aureus is capable of translocating from a primary site of infection, for example, from a subvenous catheter to secondary sites such as prosthetic devices, implants, cardiac valves, bones, and other surfaces, to form biofilms [2]. The sessile form of S. aureus embedded within a mature biofilm poses a significant health challenge as this form is resistant to most antibiotic therapies and serves as a reservoir for recurring persistent infections.
In general, biofilms are described by three processes: attachment, maturation, and detachment [1]. Biofilm formation is initiated by the attachment of S. aureus to either abiotic or biotic surfaces through wall-teichoic acid and/or receptor-mediated protein interactions. The attached cells grow and mature, and then are encapsulated in a complex extracellular polymeric substance held together by combinations of proteins, polysaccharides, and other biopolymers [3]. During the detachment process, planktonic bacteria are released from the biofilm matrix.
The current challenge in biofilm studies of S. aureus is that the exact nature (composition) of the biofilm is difficult to determine. Although biofilm characterization through a genetic approach, combined with imaging methods, and coupled to biochemical and molecular biology techniques, has provided a wealth of morphological insights [4-7], this strategy does not provide chemical and structural insight at the molecular level. Because the biofilm is a mixture of multiple components and multiple interactions and is inherently complex and heterogeneous, characterization is not amenable to conventional spectroscopic methods.
Our goal is to provide compositional, structural, and functional insights into S. aureus biofilms at the molecular level using solid-state NMR of intact cells, cell walls, and biofilms. We will gain insights into local structure and function in complicated heterogeneous biofilm systems by using a collection of specific labels. This has been our basic strategy over the years in characterizing bacteria [8], plants [9], insects [10], and animal systems [11, 12].
In this report, we focus on the quantitation of surface proteins of S. aureus during the initial stages of biofilm formation. Surface proteins are 50-100-kDa proteins that are attached to the terminal glycyl residues of non-cross-linked S. aureus peptidoglycan bridges (Figure 1) [13]. Their function is to promote binding to each other and a variety of surfaces. Each surface protein has a C-terminal hydrophobic region anchored in the cell membrane that contains a LPXTG signaling motif. Sortase enzyme recognizes this sequence and covalently links the threonine to a bridge terminal glycyl residue (Figure 1). The N-terminal regions of the surface proteins contain leucine-rich repeats which are believed to form a collection of parallel β-strands that act as a scaffold for protein-protein interactions [14].
Quantitation of total surface-protein production in biofilms by direct detection of the surface proteins themselves is complicated by multiple degradation pathways, indirect and inaccurate assays, and apparent binding of surface-protein fragments to the bacterial cell wall [15, 16]. We instead base our quantitation of total surface-protein production on solid-state NMR spectra of intact whole cells, isolated cell walls, and intact biofilms of S. aureus grown on media containing either (i) [15N]glycine (G) and l-[1-13C]threonine (T) or (ii) l-[2-13C,15N]leucine. (The leucine 15N label was not used in these experiments.) The 13C,15N-labeled TG pair is used to quantitate the fraction of peptidoglycan pentaglycyl bridge terminal –NH2 units covalently linked by sortase enzyme to a surface protein (TG cell-wall links) during biofilm formation, and the leucine 13C-label is used to quantitate the increase in leucine-rich β-strand regions available for protein-protein and protein-surface binding in biofilms.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Preparation of S. aureus whole-cell and biofilm samples
Typically, whole-cell S. aureus (SA113) samples for NMR were grown in 350 ml of enhanced standard medium (ESM) [17] at 37 °C with gentle shaking at 100 rpm. Cells were harvested at the mid-exponential phase by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. Then a whole-cell pellet was washed two times with water, centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C after each wash. The final whole-cell pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of water, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and lyophilized to yield 150 to 200 mg powder. The lyophilized powder of whole cells was pressed into cylindrical pellets and packed into a zirconia rotor for NMR measurements.
Biofilm samples were prepared by growing SA113 in ESM supplemented with 1.75% glucose, the condition optimized for maximum biofilm growth determined using a crystal violet assay. The natural abundance amino acids glycine and threonine, or leucine in ESM were respectively replaced by l-[13C]threonine and [15N]glycine or by l-[2-13C,15N]leucine. Following exponential growth, SA113 formed visible cell aggregates and biofilm. After 60 hours growth, cells were harvested by allowing biofilm to precipitate to the bottom of the culture flask. The spent media containing any planktonic cells was carefully decanted prior to centrifugation. The harvested cells were washed once with cold deionized water, flash frozen, and lyophilized.
2.2. Scanning electron microscopy of biofilm
Biofilm slides for scanning electron microscope analysis were prepared by growing SA113 in flat-bottom 6-well polystyrene tissue culture wells (Corning® Costar®) with gentle orbital shaking at 80 rpm. Each well contained 4 ml ESM supplemented with 1.75% glucose with a plastic slide (22 × 22 mm) placed at the bottom of the well for the biofilm attachment. The biofilm coated plastic slides were collected after 12-24 hours (early biofilm) and at 48-60 hours (mature biofilm) growths. Cells in biofilm were fixed with 2.5% glutardialdehyde in 0.06 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 90 min at room temperature and then washed 4 times (10 min each) in phosphate buffer. Samples were then dehydrated through a series of graded acetone-water (50%, 70%, 90%, and 100% acetone) twice with 10-min incubation for each grade. After critical-point drying (EM CPD300, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) samples were mounted on stubs and sputter coated (EM ACE 600, Leica Microsystems) with 20 nm of iridium. Biofilm was observed in a Versa 3D scanning electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
2.3. Cell-wall isolation
The cell walls were isolated from lyophilized whole cells in a manner similar to that described before [18-21] with minor modifications. The lyophilized whole cells were resuspended in about 10 ml of water and boiled for 20 min to inactivate the cells prior to centrifugation at 3200 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The whole-cell pellet was resuspended in 50 ml of 25 mM cold potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) with 5 mg of DNase I and transferred to a 70 ml bead beater (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK) chamber which was two thirds filled with 0.5-mm diameter glass beads. Cells were beat through 10 cycles of 1 min disruption and 1 min rest. Through the beating process, the bead beater chamber was kept in a bigger chamber containing an ice-water mixture to keep the bead beater chamber cold. After the fifth cycle of disruption, the ice-water mixture was refilled. After disruption, the homogenate and beads were filtered with a course sintered glass funnel (25-50 μm) to separate the homogenate (filtrate) from the beads by vacuum filtration. The beads were washed further with 70 ml of 10 mM cold EDTA solution (pH 7.0). The filtrate was centrifuged at 25,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The crude cell-wall pellet was resuspended in 20 ml of cold water, added dropwise to 100 ml of boiling 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and boiled for 30 min with constant stirring. The mixture was allowed to cool for 2 h with stirring and then maintained unstirred overnight at room temperature. SDS was removed by centrifugation of the mixture at 38,000 g for 1 h at room temperature, followed by three washes using water with centrifugation after each wash. The resulting pellet was resuspended in 60 ml of 10 mM Tris buffer (pH8.2) containing 5 mg of DNase I, 16 mg trypsin, and 16 mg α-chymotrypsin and incubated at 37 °C with shaking (150 rpm) for 16 h. This mixture was centrifuged at 38,000 g for 1 h at room temperature and washed two times using water with centrifugation after each wash. The final pellet of isolated cell walls was resuspended in about 10 ml of water, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and lyophilized. Typically 40 to 50 mg lyophilized powder was obtained. The lyophilized powder of the cell walls was pressed into cylindrical pellets and packed into a zirconia rotor for NMR measurements.
2.4. Solid-state NMR
Experiments were performed at 12 Tesla with a six-frequency transmission-line probe having a 12-mm long, 6-mm inner-diameter analytical coil, and a Chemagnetics/Varian ceramic spinning module. Samples were spun using a thin-wall Chemagnetics/Varian (Fort Collins, CO/Palo Alto, CA) 5-mm outer diameter-zirconia rotor at 7143 Hz, with the speed under active control and maintained to within ±2 Hz. A Tecmag Libra pulse programmer (Houston, TX) controlled the spectrometer. Two-kW American Microwave Technology (AMT) power amplifiers were used to produce radio-frequency pulses for 13C (125.7 MHz) and 15N (50.7 MHz). The 1H (499.8 MHz) radio-frequency pulses were generated by a 2-kW Creative Electronics tube amplifier driven by a 50-W AMT amplifier. All final-stage amplifiers were under active control [22]. The 7r-pulse lengths were 8 μs for 13C and 1H, and 9 μs for 15N. Proton-carbon-matched cross-polarization transfers were made in 2 ms at 56 kHz. Proton dipolar decoupling was 100 kHz during N{C} and C{N} REDOR evolution and data acquisition. The S and S0 alternate-scan strategy compensated for short-term drifts in REDOR experiments. Standard XY-8 phase cycling [23] was used for all refocusing observe-channel π pulses (inserted at the end of each rotor period during dipolar evolution) and dephasing π pulses (inserted in the middle of each rotor period) to compensate for finite pulse imperfections. Typically, CPMAS spectra from 100-mg whole-cell and 50-mg cell-wall samples were the result of the accumulation of 20,000 to 40,000 scans at room temperature with a recycle delay of 2 sec (about 1 day per spectrum). The N{C} REDOR experiments involved 100,000 scans (5 days), and the C{N} REDOR experiments used to generate double differences, 200,000 scans (10 days) for each spectrum.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Leakage of 13C label from threonine
The one-bond 16-Tr N{C} REDOR ΔS/S0 for the amide-nitrogen signal (80 ppm) of cell walls isolated either from planktonic whole cells or biofilms labeled by [15N]glycine+ l-[1-13C]threonine is about 5% (Figure 2, left and Table 1, first row). If only natural-abundance 13C were contributing, we would expect a ΔS/S0 on the order of 2%. That is, for every 200 carbons in pentaglycine bridges (10 carbons per bridge) of peptidoglycan of isolated cell walls (20 bridges), each glycyl 15N would have a 1% chance of having a 13C carbonyl-carbon nearest neighbor, and a 1% chance of having a 13C CH2-carbon nearest neighbor. (This calculation ignores open bridges which end in glycyl amines and are present in low concentration; see below.) We attribute the observed N{C} ΔS/S0 of 5.1% to a constant degradative leakage of l-[1-13C]threonine to [1-13C]glycine [24]. For the cell walls of the planktonic cells, ΔS/S0 is 4.8% (Table 1, first row, first entry). Hence, the l-[1-13C]threonine leakage to [1-13C]glycine during growth is at a rate of approximately 2.5 carbonyl carbons per 100 (ΔS/S0 of 2% + 2.5% = 4.5%). The cell walls from the biofilm samples have an additional contribution to the N{C} ΔS/S0 which will be detailed in Section 3.4.
Table 1. Labeling of cell walls by [15N]Gly + l-[1-13C]Thr.
Planktonic (mid-exponential) | Early Biofilm (12-hour growth) | Mature Biofilm (48-hour growth) | |
---|---|---|---|
Amide N{C} ΔS/S0 | 0.048 (exp) 0.045 (model) |
0.053 (exp) 0.055 (model) |
0.051 (exp) 0.055 (model) |
Amine to amide 15N integrated peak intensity (open bridges) | 0.038 | 0.032 | 0.039 |
Glycyl C{N} ΔS/S0 (15N-isotopic enrichment) | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.72 |
Carbonyl to glycyl methylene C{N} ΔS/S0 | 3.2 (exp) 3.5 (model) |
3.8 (exp) 4.5 (model) |
4.3 (exp) 4.5 (model) |
3.2. Open bridges
The full-echo 15N S0 for the isolated cell walls of S. aureus (SA113) mature biofilm labeled by [15N]glycine plus l-[1-13C]threonine shows a minor amine-nitrogen peak (Figure 2, bottom left). (S. aureus strain SA113 is ATCC 35556, a restriction-deficient mutant of NCTC 8325, which exhibits strong biofilm-forming tendencies in the presence of excess glucose.) This peak arises from peptidoglycan pentaglycyl bridges that are not cross-linked [19]. The integrated intensity of the amine peak to that of the amide-nitrogen peak (corrected for cross-polarization dynamics) is just under 4% and is constant for cell walls isolated from planktonic and biofilm samples (Table 1, row 2). This means that for every 100 nitrogens in pentaglycine bridges (20 bridges), 16 are involved in cross-links between peptidoglycan peptide stems and 4 are open, or uncross-linked (Figure 1, bottom). Stem cross-linking may be somewhat lower than 80% (16/20) because stems without bridges are possible [19].
3.3. 15N isotopic enrichment
The one-bond 16-Tr C{N} REDOR ΔS/S0 for the 13C NMR of cell walls isolated either from planktonic whole cells or biofilms labeled by [15N]glycine+l-[1-13C]threonine is dominated by a peptide carbonyl-carbon peak near 170 ppm (and its spinning sidebands) and a smaller methylene-carbon peak near 42 ppm (Figure 2, right). Both ΔS and S0 methylene-carbon peaks are resolved and arise exclusively from natural-abundance 13C. Their ratio therefore determines the 15N isotopic enrichment which is 84% for the planktonic whole-cell sample; the enrichment decreases with the age of the biofilm samples (Table 1, row 3). We attribute the decrease in enrichment for the biofilm samples to de novo synthesis of glycine by S. aureus as the supply of exogenous labeled glycine decreases [20].
3.4. Threonine-glycine cell-wall linkages
The ratio of the one-bond C{N} carbonyl-carbon ΔS to that of the glycyl methylene-carbon ΔS for cell walls of planktonic cells is 3.2 (Table 1, row 4, first entry). Because the cell-wall isolation removes all cytoplasmic and membrane-associated proteins, the only contributions to this ratio arise from peptidoglycan bridges. We therefore expect a ratio of (1.0+2.5) to 1.0 when we take into account natural-abundance (1.0) and labeled carbonyl-carbon 13C (2.5 from the threonine leakage) per 20 bridges, compared to just natural-abundance 13C for the CH2 carbons (1.0). This ratio increases significantly for the biofilm samples, to 3.8 for the early biofilm, and 4.3 for the mature biofilm (Table 1, row 4, second and third entries). The increase occurs because of accumulating sortase-generated TG cell-wall linkages that survive the isolation and digestion procedures even though most of the surface protein itself is lost. The observed mature biofilm carbonyl-to-glycyl-methylene-carbon C{N} ΔS values that reach 4.3 (Table 1, row 4) indicate that 1 TG link (4.3 minus 3.2) is created per 20 bridges so that the expected one-bond C{N} carbonyl-carbon ΔS to that of the glycyl methylene-carbon ΔS for cell walls of mature biofilms is (1.0+2.5+1.0) to 1.0, in reasonable agreement with the 4.3 value that is observed. Thus, one of the four open bridges (per 20 bridges) has been used to attach sortase-A-mediated surface proteins (Figure 1, bottom). The 13C-15N TG link concentration of 1 per 20 bridges in biofilms also increases the expected amide N{C} ΔS/S0 from 0.045 (Section 3.1) to 0.055 (Table 1, row 1).
3.5. Comparisons of whole-cell and cell-wall labeling using C{N} REDOR double differences
About half of the glycine residues in whole cells of S. aureus are in the cell-wall peptidoglycan bridges and half in the cytoplasm [25-27]. Thus, the planktonic whole-cell carbonyl-carbon C{N} ΔS (Figure 3, bottom left) arises from the peptidoglycan ΔS (3.5 intensity units per 20 bridges which includes label and natural-abundance 13C) and membrane-associated surface protein (assumed for now to be 1.0 unit per 20 bridges), and from cytoplasmic glycine (G) or threonine (T) 13C directly bonded to glycyl 15N (Figure 1, bottom). If we assume the frequency of occurrence of the cytoplasmic G or T residues bonded to glycyl 15N is the same (approximately 4%), then the cytoplasmic C{N} ΔS is dominated by TG linkages because the isotopic enrichment of the threonine carbonyl-13C is 99% while that of the glycine carbonyl-13C is just 3.5% (including leakage of threonine label to glycine). A cytoplasmic ΔS of about 4 units (per 20 bridges or 100 carbonyl carbons) will result in a total whole-cell planktonic ΔS of 8.5 units (3.5+1.0+4.0), which is a sum of peptidoglycan ΔS (3.5), surface protein (1.0), and cytoplasmic ΔS (4.0). The expected planktonic whole-cell ΔS minus planktonic cell-wall ΔS scaled by the planktonic whole-cell ΔS is therefore (8.5 – 3.5)/8.5= 0.59. The experimental ΔΔS/ΔS value is close at 0.47 (Figure 3, top left, and Table 2, row 1). If there is no membrane-associated surface protein in the planktonic whole cells, the expected ΔΔS/ΔS value is (7.5 - 3.5)/7.5=0.53, a slightly better match to experiment. However, the improvement is small and is not sufficient to conclude that there is no membrane-associated surface protein in the planktonic whole cells. The decision between the presence or absence of membrane-associated surface protein in planktonic whole cells requires the use of another REDOR double difference as discussed in the next section.
Table 2. Comparisons of whole-cell and cell-wall labeling by [15N]Gly + l-[1-13C]Thr using carbonyl-carbon C{N} REDOR double differences.
Comparison | ΔΔS/ΔS |
---|---|
planktonic whole-cell ΔS minus planktonic cell-wall ΔS scaled by planktonic whole-cell ΔS |
0.47 (exp) 0.59 (model) |
planktonic whole-cell ΔS minus 48-hour biofilm whole-cell ΔS scaled by planktonic whole-cell ΔS |
0.18 (exp) 0.12 (model) |
48-hour biofilm cell-wall ΔS minus planktonic cell-wall ΔS scaled by planktonic cell-wall ΔS |
0.33 (exp) 0.29 (model) |
3.6. Schematic model for surface proteins in biofilm formation and REDOR double differences
We show the labeling numbers from the previous two sections in Figure 4 where the top row has scanning electron micrographs of planktonic whole cells, an early biofilm with clear signs of cell-cell aggregation, and a later biofilm with aggregated cells embedded in an extracellular matrix. The bottom row has a model to account for changes in surface proteins during biofilm formation. The surface proteins are membrane associated in the planktonic cells, peptidoglycan bound but not fully deployed in the early-stage biofilm, and peptidoglycan bound and fully deployed in the mature biofilm. The mature biofilm has an enhanced β-strand content and a reduced α-helix content, presumably associated with extracellular leucine-rich regions in cell-cell contacts [14]. The enhanced β-strand determination was made using the α- and β-leucine C-2 carbon chemical shifts (Figure 5), which are separated by about 5 ppm [28].
The cytoplasmic content of the biofilms is assumed to be reduced slightly compared to the planktonic whole-cell value. The numbers in parentheses in Figure 4 give the count of double-labeled 13C-15N direct bonds (per 20 bridges) for each stage of the model and therefore all the C{N} REDOR double differences of Figure 3. (The natural-abundace-13C-based contributions are not included in these numbers.) The ΔΔS comparison (planktonic whole cells minus mature biofilm whole cells) scaled by the planktonic whole-cell ΔS is (8.5 – 7.5)/8.5=0.12 for the model and 0.18 observed (Figure 3, left, and Table 2, row 2). A non-zero double difference requires that there be a contribution to the planktonic ΔS from membrane-associated surface protein in the planktonic whole cells. Because all carbonyl-carbon ΔS values were obtained by zeroing the methylene-carbon ΔS, the difference in 15N isotopic enrichment for planktonic whole cells and mature biofilm whole cells has been taken into account.
The ΔΔS comparison (mature biofilm cell-wall ΔS minus planktonic cell-wall ΔS) scaled by the planktonic cell-wall ΔS is (4.5 – 3.5)/3.5=0.29 for the model and 0.33 observed (Figure 3, right, and Table 2, row 3). Uncertainties in the cytoplasmic content of the biofilms, and in the extent of membrane anchoring of the surface proteins in planktonic whole cells are absent in this important cell-wall double difference. The ΔΔS of one unit (per 20 bridges) is consistent with the determination (based on the carbonyl-to-glycyl-methylene ΔS's) that one of the four open bridges has been used to attach a surface protein in biofilms (Section 3.4). The experimental double difference also shows a 2-ppm shift to low field for 13C-15N pairs in TG linkages compared to those in GG linkages (Figure 3, right, dotted line). This double difference is the first direct detection (with molecular resolution) of peptidoglycan-bound TG linkers to surface proteins.
3.7. Leucine-rich β-strand proximity to tyrosine residues in biofilms
We used 13C-13C spin diffusion to determine nearest neighbors of the β-strand leucine 13C label (Figure 6). After cross-polarization, carbon magnetization is stored along the z-axis by a 90° pulse. The β-strand peak is then selectively inverted and the 13C label allowed to couple to nearby natural-abundance 13Cs by 13C-13C spin diffusion during mixing times unaided by coupling to adjacent protons [21]. For mixing times of 200 ms, a range of 2.5 Å is possible, which connects the 2-13C leucine label to other carbons in the leucine residue (Figure 6, bottom right). For mixing times of 800 ms, spin diffusion couples the 2-13C leucine label to more distant carbons, including aromatic carbons (128 ppm, Figure 6, top right insert). There is usually no phenylalanine aromatic-carbon peak below 130 ppm [29] and the occurrence of tryptophan residues in proteins is small. We therefore tentatively assign the 128-ppm aromatic-carbon peak to tyrosines, which have three ring carbons (γ, δ, δ) with shifts close to 128 ppm [29].
3.8. Surface protein mediated biofilm
REDOR NMR analyses of S. aureus whole cells and cell walls have established that 20% of the pentaglycine bridges in cell walls are potential sortase-mediated surface-protein attachment sites. In mature biofilms, approximately one-fourth of these sites have a surface protein attached. That is, for every 20 peptidoglycan-repeat units, one unit has a surface protein attached. Because the cell wall of S. aureus has approximately 20 layers of peptidoglycan, one surface protein per 20 peptidoglycan-repeat units translates into an almost complete cell-wall surface decoration in biofilms by covalently attached proteins (Figure 7, right). That is, there is one surface protein for every surface peptidoglycan repeat unit.
In S. aureus, 21 surface proteins that have a LPXTG targeting signal for sortase-A-mediated cell-wall attachment have been identified by genomic analysis [30]. Of these, 11 are known proteins, mostly adhesins involved in attachment to biotic and abiotic surfaces, cell clumping, endocytosis bacterial uptake, and biofilm formation [31]. The fibronectin-binding proteins (FnBPs) have been recently identified as key cell-wall attached proteins required for the formation of biofilms [32]. Attenuation of FnBPs expression significantly reduces S. aureus biofilm formation on implanted catheters [33]. The deletion of ΔfnbA and ΔfnbB (FnBPs) in S. aureus USA300, a community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus, prevented the formation of biofilm [34].
The majority of cell-wall anchored proteins have high concentrations of β-sheet structures. In the case of FnBPs, 10-11 tandem repeats of a fibronectin-binding domain are rich in β sheets [35]. Our observations of increased surface-protein attachment to peptidoglycan in biofilms (Figure 3), accompanied by an increase in concentration of β-strands in leucine-rich regions (Figure 5), and their proximity to tyrosines and potential O-sulfated binding sites (Figure 6), provide direct experimental molecular parameters associated with sortase-mediated biofilm formation in S. aureus.
Highlights.
Staphylococcus aureus cell-wall composition has been characterized by solid-state NMR for planktonic cells, young biofilms, and mature biofilms specifically 13C and 15N labeled.
20% of cell-wall peptidoglycan pentaglycyl bridges are not cross-linked in planktonic cells and so are potential sortase-mediated surface-protein attachment sites.
One-fourth of these sites have a surface protein attached in mature biofilms.
The concentration of β-strands in leucine-rich regions doubles in the transition from planktonic cell to mature biofilm.
In a mature biofilm, surface proteins attach to each layer of peptidoglycan so that there is one surface protein covalently attached for each surface peptidoglycan repeat unit.
Acknowledgments
This paper is based on work supported by the National Institutes of Health under Grant Number GM116130. The authors thank Professor Chad Rienstra (UIUC) for pointing out the sensitivity of the leucine C-2 carbon isotropic chemical shift to local protein conformation. We also thank Professor Fritz Götz (University of Tübingen) for providing the S. aureus strain SA113, and Dr. Bernd Zechmann (Center for Microscopy and Imaging, Baylor University) for technical support in obtaining SEM images.
Abbreviations
- ESM
enhanced standard medium
- REDOR
rotational-echo double-resonance
- C{N}
13C observe and 15N dephase
- N{C}
15N observe and 13C dephase
- S0
full-echo REDOR signal
- S
dephased REDOR signal
- ΔS (S0 – S)
REDOR difference
- DANTE
delay and nutation tailored excitation
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Otto M. Staphylococcal infections: mechanisms of biofilm maturation anddetachment as critical determinants of pathogenicity. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:175–188. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042711-140023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Romano CL, Toscano M, Romano D, Drago L. Antibiofilm agents and implant- related infections in orthopaedics: where are we? J Chemother. 2013;25:67–80. doi: 10.1179/1973947812Y.0000000045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Flemming HC, Neu TR, Wozniak DJ. The EPS matrix: “the house of biofilm cells”. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:7945–7947. doi: 10.1128/JB.00858-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Periasamy S, Joo HS, Duong AC, Bach TH, Tan VY, Chatterjee SS, Cheung GY, Otto M. How Staphylococcus aureus biofilms develop their characteristic structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:1281–1286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115006109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Friedman L, Kolter R. Two genetic loci produce distinct carbohydrate-rich structural components of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:4457–4465. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.14.4457-4465.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thurlow LR, Hanke ML, Fritz T, Angle A, Aldrich A, Williams SH, Engebretsen IL, Bayles KW, Horswill AR, Kielian T. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms prevent macrophage phagocytosis and attenuate inflammation in vivo. J Immunol. 2011;186:6585–6596. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boles BR, Horswill AR. agr-Mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000052. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jacob GS, Schaefer J, Stejskal EO, McKay RA. Solid-state NMR determination of glyphosate metabolism in a Pseudomonas sp. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:5899–5905. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Coker GT, Garbow JR, Schaefer J. 15N and 13C NMR determination of methionine metabolism in developing soybean cotyledons. Plant Physiol. 1987;83:698–702. doi: 10.1104/pp.83.3.698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schaefer J, Kramer KJ, Garbow JR, Jacob GS, Stejskal EO, Hopkins TL, Speirs RD. Aromatic cross-links in insect cuticle: detection by solid-state 13C and 15N NMR. Science. 1987;235:1200–1204. doi: 10.1126/science.3823880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garbow JR, Ridley WP, Bork V, Pan Y, Schaefer J. Milacemide metabolismin rat liver and brain slices by solids NMR. Drug Metab Dispos. 1994;22:298–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McDowell LM, Burzio LA, Waite JH, Schaefer J. Rotational echo double resonance detection of cross-links formed in mussel byssus under high-flow stress. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:20293–20295. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Navarre WW, Schneewind O. Surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria and mechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63:174–229. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.1.174-229.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kobe B, Deisenhofer J. Proteins with leucine-rich repeats. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995;5:409–416. doi: 10.1016/0959-440x(95)80105-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Geoghegan JA, Corrigan RM, Gruszka DT, Speziale P, O'Gara JP, Potts JR, Foster TJ. Role of surface protein SasG in biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:5663–5673. doi: 10.1128/JB.00628-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vyas N, Sammons RL, Addison O, Dehghani H, Walmsley AD. A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32694. doi: 10.1038/srep32694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chang JD, Foster EE, Yang H, Kim SJ. Quantification of the D-Ala-D-Lac-terminated peptidoglycan structure in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a combined solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry analysis. Biochemistry. 2017;56:612–622. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tong G, Pan Y, Dong H, Pryor R, Wilson GE, Schaefer J. Structure and dynamics of pentaglycyl bridges in the cell walls of Staphylococcus aureus by 13C-15N REDOR NMR. Biochemistry. 1997;36:9859–9866. doi: 10.1021/bi970495d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim SJ, Cegelski L, Studelska DR, O'Connor RD, Mehta AK, Schaefer J. Rotational-echo double resonance characterization of vancomycin binding sites in Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry. 2002;41:6967–6977. doi: 10.1021/bi0121407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou X, Cegelski L. Nutrient-dependent structural changes in S. aureus peptidoglycan revealed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 2012;51:8143–8153. doi: 10.1021/bi3012115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang H, Singh M, Kim SJ, Schaefer J. Characterization of the tertiary structure of the peptidoglycan of Enterococcus faecalis. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2017;1859:2171–2180. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stueber D, Mehta AK, Chen Z, Wooley KL, Schaefer J. Local order in polycarbonate glasses by 13C{19F} rotational-echo double-resonance NMR. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys. 2006;44:2760–2775. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gullion T, Baker DB, Conradi MS. New, compensated Carr-Purcell sequences. J Magn Reson. 1990;89:479–484. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Voet JG, Voet D. Biochemistry. 3rd. John Wiley & Sons; New Jersey: 2004. p. 996. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cegelski L, Steuber D, Mehta AK, Kulp DW, Axelsen PH, Schaefer J. Conformational and quantitative characterization of oritavancin-peptidoglycan complexes in whole cells of Staphylococcus aureus by in vivo 13C and 15N labeling. J Mol Biol. 2006;357:1253–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim SJ, Cegelski L, Stueber D, Singh M, Dietrich E, Tanaka KS, Parr TR, Far AR, Schaefer J. Oritavancin exhibits dual mode of action to inhibit cell-wall biosynthesis in Staphylococcus aureus. J Mol Biol. 2008;377:281–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kim SJ, Singh M, Sharif S, Schaefer J. Cross-link formation and peptidoglycan lattice assembly in the FemA mutant of Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry. 2014;53:1420–1427. doi: 10.1021/bi4016742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sperling LJ, Berthold DA, Sasser TL, Jeisy-Scott V, Rienstra CM. Assignment strategies for large proteins by magic-angle spinning NMR: the 21-kDa disulfide-bond-forming enzyme DsbA. J Mol Biol. 2010;399:268–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Torizawa T, Ono AM, Terauchi T, Kainosho M. NMR assignment methods for the aromatic ring resonances of phenylalanine and tyrosine residues in proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:12620–12626. doi: 10.1021/ja051386m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Roche FM, Massey R, Peacock SJ, Day NP, Visai L, Speziale P, Lam A, Pallen M, Foster TJ. Characterization of novel LPXTG-containing proteins of Staphylococcus aureus identified from genome sequences. Microbiology. 2003;149:643–654. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.25996-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Höök M. Adhesion invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:49–62. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Speziale P, Pietrocola G, Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA. Protein-based biofilm matrices in Staphylococci. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:171. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vergara-Irigaray M, Valle J, Merino N, Latasa C, Garcia B, Ruiz de Los Mozos I, Solano C, Toledo-Arana A, Penades JR, Lasa I. Relevant role of fibronectin-binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-associated foreign-body infections. Infect Immun. 2009;77:3978–3991. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00616-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McCourt J, O'Halloran DP, McCarthy H, O'Gara JP, Geoghegan JA. Fibronectin-binding proteins are required for biofilm formation by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain LAC. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;353:157–164. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Foster TJ. The remarkably multifunctional fibronectin binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35:1923–1931. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2763-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]