Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 May;32(3):239–245. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000384

Genetic Basis of Aortic Valvular Disease

Sara N Koenig 1,2,3, Joy Lincoln 1,2,4, Vidu Garg 1,2,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC5783785  NIHMSID: NIHMS872947  PMID: 28157139

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Aortic valve disease is relatively common and encompasses both congenital and acquired forms. Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common type of cardiac malformation and predisposes to the development of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). Since the description of the link between NOTCH1 and BAV and CAVD approximately a decade ago, there have been significant advances in the genetic and molecular understanding of these diseases.

Recent findings

Recent work has defined the congenital cardiac phenotypes linked to mutations in NOTCH1 and in addition, novel etiologic genes for BAV have been discovered using new genetic technologies in humans. Furthermore, several mouse models of BAV have been described defining the role of endothelial Notch1 in aortic valve morphogenesis while others have implicated new genes. These murine models along with other cell-based studies have led to molecular insights in the pathogenesis of CAVD.

Summary

These findings provide important insights into the molecular and genetic basis of aortic valve malformations, including BAV, specifically highlighting the etiologic role of endothelial cells. In addition, numerous investigations in the mechanisms of CAVD demonstrate the importance of developmental origins and signaling pathways as well as communication between valve endothelial cells and the underlying interstitial cells in valve disease onset and progression.

Keywords: Bicuspid aortic valve, aortic valve calcification, genetics, congenital heart disease

Introduction

Heart valve disease is responsible for over 24,000 deaths each year in the United States [1]. Valvular heart disease encompasses both congenital and acquired forms and in the United States has an overall prevalence of 2.5% [1]. Among the four cardiac valves, the most commonly affected is the aortic valve and significantly contributes to both morbidity and mortality. Prevalence of aortic valve dysfunction (stenosis or regurgitation) is increased with age affecting an estimated 2–3% of the population over 75 years of age, and when severe requires surgical or catheter-based aortic valve replacement [1,2]. The most prevalent disease affecting the aortic valve is calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD), where calcification of the normally thin valve cusp perturbs the valve’s ability to open and close properly to maintain adequate unidirectional blood flow. In addition to advanced age, other clinical risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes mellitus are associated with CAVD, but an additional important contributor is the presence of a congenital malformation, bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) [3]. BAV has a prevalence of 1.3% in the population and a significant contributor to the development of severe aortic stenosis [4, 5]. Although the mechanisms of congenital BAV and acquired CAVD are not fully understood, there is increasing evidence to suggest that genes critical for normal aortic valve development may play roles in the development of CAVD.

The aortic valve is a tricuspid structure and each mature valve leaflet, or cusp, is comprised of three organized layers of extracellular matrix (ECM). The fibrosa comprised of collagen, the proteoglycan-rich spongiosa, and the elastin fiber-containing ventricularis (Figure 1). At the cellular level, the aortic valve is composed of valvular interstitial cells (VICs) that deposit the specialized ECM components and a layer of overlying valve endothelial cells (VECs) encapsulates the cusp. Aortic valve develops between 7–9 weeks of gestation in the human embryo and studies in animal models have demonstrated the multiple cellular sources from which aortic VECs and VICs are derived [6,7]. The semilunar (aortic and pulmonic) valves are formed from the endocardial cushions that appear as “swellings” within the embryonic cardiac outflow tract. Cushion formation begins with endocardial-to-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) of cells largely derived from the second heart field (SHF) in response to TGF-β, WNT, Notch and VEGF signaling pathways. An additional cellular contribution to the valve leaflets is from migrating cardiac neural crest cells (CNC). The outflow tract (OFT) endocardial cushions undergo remodeling to form the tri-leaflet aortic and pulmonic valve primordia, which will continue to develop by a process of thinning, reshaping and elongation well into postnatal maturation to form the mature valve cusps.

Figure 1. Overview of aortic valve structure.

Figure 1

The aortic valve is a highly organized structure composed of cellular and extracellular components. Each valve cusp is surrounded by a continuous, single layer of valve endothelial cells and interspersed by valve interstitial cells. The extracellular matrix is highly organized and largely composed of elastin fibers in the atrialis/ventricularis (dark grey), proteoglycans in the spongiosa (blue) and collagens (yellow) in the fibrosa and these are arranged according to blood flow (red arrows).

In contrast to healthy, trilaminar adult aortic valve cusps, the identification of calcific nodules in the collagen-based fibrosa on the arterial side of the aortic valve and disruption of this trilaminar valve structure are hallmarks of CAVD, which occurs in individuals with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valves, although individuals with BAV are predisposed to more severe disease (Figure 2) [8]. The molecular mechanisms driving the ECM disorganization and calcification are thought to be the result of abnormal gene expression and mediated by VICs and interestingly, these signaling pathways in diseased valves are also critical for normal valve development [9]. An increased understanding of mechanisms underlying aortic valve development and disease along with recent advances in human genetics have resulted in significant insights to the molecular basis of aortic valve disease and here, we review the recent highlights in the molecular genetics of BAV and CAVD.

Figure 2. Congenital bicuspid aortic valve with the development of calcification.

Figure 2

(A, B) The normal aortic valve consists of three cusps, and during diastole (A) and systole (B) the cusps sufficiently coapt and fully open respectively to regulate unidirectional blood flow. In contrast, bicuspid aortic valves consist of two cusps that results in narrowing (D) and leads to lifelong changes in valve biomechanics, stenosis and increases the risk of calcification (shown as nodules in C, D).

Genetics of Bicuspid Aortic Valve

BAV is the most prevalent birth defect, and population based studies have supported a strong genetic component along with other left-sided cardiac malformations [10]. Initial insight into the genetic etiology of BAV came from studies of familial BAV where mutations in NOTCH1 were discovered to segregate in families with autosomal-dominant valve disease [11]. Since this, the majority of NOTCH1 mutations that have been reported are inherited from unaffected family members [12]. Recently, genetic screening of NOTCH1 was performed in 428 probands with left-sided congenital heart disease (CHD) and 14 mutations in NOTCH1 were identified, 11 of which were in familial CHD. Interestingly, among these cases, a family member also had a CHD affecting the right-sided cardiac outflow tract (i.e. tetralogy of Fallot)[13]. Additional reports support this finding that mutations in NOTCH1 cause malformations of the right and left sided cardiac outflow tract within families [11,14,15]. The other gene linked to BAV in humans is GATA5, where rare sequence variants in GATA5 were identified in patients with BAV by multiple groups [16,17,18]. Similar to NOTCH1, mutations in GATA5 have reported in a spectrum of CHD, including tetralogy of Fallot [19,20,21]. Furthermore, a deleterious mutation in NKX2.5 that completely abolished its interaction with GATA5 was found to segregate with disease in a family with BAV, further supporting these findings [22].

While these efforts have primarily focused on non-syndromic BAV, Quintero-Riviera et al. utilized the Developmental Genome Anatomy Project and identified a proband with a balanced translocation involving chromosomes 1 and 5 who had BAV, coarctation of the aorta, and patent ductus arteriosus along with pervasive development delay [23]. The translocation breakpoint was found to disrupt the 3’UTR of MATR3, which encodes the nuclear matrix protein Matrin 3. They found that Matr3 was expressed ubiquitously in the OFT, and heterozygous disruption of Matr3 in mice recapitulated the cardiac phenotypes of the proband. The findings for MATR3 are limited to a single patient and while supported by murine studies, future work is needed to determine if mutations in MATR3 contribute to non-syndromic BAV.

Molecular Pathways for Aortic Valve Development

While human genetic approaches have led to important insights into the genetics of BAV, molecular studies using mouse models have provided insights into the underlying mechanisms of BAV and also identified novel candidate genes for BAV. The discovery that humans with heterozygous mutations in NOTCH1 displayed aortic valve disease was not surprising since Notch signaling plays a critical role in several cardiovascular diseases [24]. Binding of the Notch signaling pathway ligands (Jagged and Delta-like) to the Notch receptors (1–4) initiates a sequence of cleavages, releasing the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) for nuclear translocation and initiation of target gene expression. Notch1 is the predominate receptor that functions in endothelial cells during cardiovascular development, where it is required for initiation of EMT, and persists after EMT throughout valve remodeling and into adulthood. Disruption of several Notch pathway members results in dysregulated EMT, leading to embryonic lethality and/or abnormal valve development [24].

Unlike humans, Notch1 heterozygous mice are phenotypically normal. By introducing Notch1 haploinsufficiency into a nitric oxide synthase (Nos3)-null background (Notch1+/−;Nos3−/−), a highly penetrant mouse model of aortic valve disease consisting of BAV with thickened cusps, stenosis and regurgitation was generated. The disease severity was significantly greater than the ~30% incidence of BAV observed in Nos3-knockout mice alone [25,26]. These compound mutant mice also suffer from significant (~65%) postnatal lethality. Although normal Mendelian ratios of Notch1+/−;Nos3−/− embryos were found at embryonic day(E) 18.5, thickened aortic valve cusps at E15.5 were suggestive of a defect in remodeling of the semilunar valve cushions. In addition, we found that heterozygosity of Notch1 specifically in endothelial and endothelial-derived cells in a Nos3-null background recapitulate the congenital cardiac phenotype of Notch1+/−;Nos3−/− embryos [27]. These compound mutant mice also presented with overriding aorta and ventricular septal defect (VSD), which is reminiscent of tetralogy of Fallot, a congenital defect observed in patients with Alagille syndrome caused by mutations in JAG1. CHD associated with Alagille syndrome, which is also characterized by bile duct abnormalities, dysmorphic facies, ophthalmologic findings and butterfly vertebrae, have been attributed to endothelial-derived Jag1 in mice [28]. Our data in conjunction with this mouse model of Alagille syndrome implies critical signaling between Jag1 and Notch1 for proper formation of the semilunar valves, ventricular septum, and position of outflow tract.

Studies have implicated Dll4 and Jag1 as the ligands expressed in endothelial cells that signal to Notch1 during EMT [24], but until lately the spatio-temporal patterns of expression and signaling had not been delineated. Recent work by MacGrogan et al utilizes various Cre systems to describe the functions of Notch signaling pathway members during valve development. Their studies suggest that endothelial-Dll4 is required for EMT, but shortly after, endothelial-Jag1 takes over as the predominant Notch ligand in the endocardial cushions. Deletion of endothelial-derived Jag1 in a subset of endothelial cells that do not undergo EMT leads to thickened arterial valves, BAV, and VSD that was shown to be mediated by endothelial-Notch1. Transcriptome analysis revealed increased BMP signaling and mesenchymal cell proliferation, and also led to the identification of a new Notch effector, Heparin binding epidermal growth factor (EGF) like growth factor, required to suppress mesenchymal cell proliferation and potentially play a role in embryonic valve hypertrophy [29].

A recent complimentary study by Wang et al also explored the post-EMT requirements of Notch1 in the valve endothelium and mesenchyme. Homozygous deletion of Notch1 in post-EMT endothelial cells resulted in BAV and valve stenosis, which was accompanied by an increase in apoptosis and a reduction in proliferation of valve mesenchyme cells. Additionally, Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) was identified as a novel target of endothelial Notch1 that mediates apoptosis in the valve mesenchyme post-EMT, and loss of Tnf signaling resulted in hypertrophic semilunar valves [30]. This study along with the studies by MacGrogan et al and Koenig et al. further solidified the role for endothelial Notch1 in the development of BAV. Furthermore, previous work had demonstrated that deletion of endothelial-Gata5 led to BAV in mice [31]. In these in vivo studies, the investigators identified downregulation of the Notch signaling along with other endothelial genes including Nos3. Additional work has described the Slit-Robo signaling pathway upstream of Notch signaling in aortic valve development. This pathway, which is important for axonal guidance during nervous system development, was shown to be involved in the remodeling of the cardiac cushions as Robo1 and Robo2 compound mutant mice display BAV phenotypes [32]. It remains to be seen if these and other endothelial genes will be important in human BAV.

Molecular Pathways for Aortic Valve Calcification

The aortic valve cusp is comprised of VICs distributed throughout the three specialized layers of ECM and surrounded by a monolayer of VECs. This specific composition allows the valve to comply with hemodynamic stresses during normal function and the anatomical localization allows for communication between the VICs and the external environment via VECs. In a healthy aortic valve, VICs are quiescent. In CAVD, VICs adopt an activated state in which they begin to express αSMA and transform into osteoblast-like cells, expressing RUNX2 and other calcification promoting proteins like bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). VECs are subjected to laminar shear stress on the ventricularis side that is protective against CAVD, while oscillatory shear stress adjacent to the fibrosa is associated with calcification [33]. Although alterations in several signaling pathways in VECs and VICs have been implicated, the molecular mechanisms of CAVD remain poorly understood [34].

The discovery linking mutations in NOTCH1 with CAVD in humans provided an entry point to elucidating the mechanistic basis for valve calcification [11,35]. Initial work using cultured aortic VICs demonstrated that inhibition of Notch1 promoted aortic valve calcification through repression of Bmp2 and Sox9, which have independently been linked to play a significant role in CAVD suggesting that Notch1 signaling functions upstream of these mediators of calcification [36,37,38,39]. Both VECs and VICs have important functions in maintaining healthy aortic valves, but it is important to study these cells in combination to properly consider the effects of VEC:VIC communication on cell signaling. Accordingly, nitric oxide (NO) from VECs was shown to regulate Notch1 in aortic VICs during the process of calcification using an in vitro system [26]. Similar evidence supporting the importance of VEC was shown by Huk et al., who demonstrated that endothelial TGFβ1 was necessary to maintain nuclear Sox9 expression in VICs and prevent calcification using both in vitro and in vivo models [40].

Recently, additional work has defined the mechanisms by which haploinsufficiency of Notch1 leads to CAVD. In order to define the role of Notch1 in AVICs, immortalized aortic VICs were isolated from Notch1+/− Immortomice, a compound mutant mouse which is both heterozygous for Notch1 and expresses the immortalizing oncogene simian virus 40 (SV40) large tumor (T) antigen (Ag), and were found to not only have molecular differences at baseline but also had an exaggerated response to cyclic mechanical strain, which mimics in vivo diastolic loading, becoming fully activated and resulting in calcification [41]. Further mechanistic insight was found by studying calcified human aortic valves, where the long non-coding RNA, lncRNA H19, was identified as a NOTCH1 repressor with a direct role in calcification of human aortic VICs. H19 expression was shown to inversely correlate with CpG methylation at the H19 promoter, indicating epigenetic regulation of expression. Silencing H19 inhibits RUNX2 and BMP2, classic markers of osteogenic calcification, and reduced mineralization, while overexpression had the opposite effects. Furthermore, it was found that H19 overexpression reduced activity on the NOTCH1 promoter, identifying H19 as a novel suppressor of NOTCH1 and therapeutic target in CAVD [42].

While Notch1 is expressed in VICs, it is also expressed in VECs. Theodoris et al utilized iPSC-derived VECs from patients with a NOTCH1 CAVD-associated mutation, subjected the endothelial cells to shear stress, and profiled the transcriptome. Hemodynamic shear stress caused an increase in anti-osteogenic and anti-inflammatory networks in wildtype, but not NOTCH1+/− endothelial cells, indicating that endothelial NOTCH1 mediates the protective effects of shear stress [43]. The authors also found a discrepancy in H3K27ac at NOTCH1-bound enhancers, which correlated with an alteration in the downstream transcriptome, suggesting that this mutation alters the epigenetic profile in endothelial cells [42]. In another related study, the same group discovered that Matrix Gla Protein (MGP) is a direct target of NOTCH1 in human aortic VECs and responds to shear stress in a NOTCH1-dependent manner. Furthermore, in vivo experiments show that mutation of the CSL binding sites on the MGP enhancer dramatically attenuates expression of MGP in the valves and arterial system [44].

In addition to shear stress and other environmental factors, VECs are subject to the effects of aging, which is coupled with a significant risk of CAVD [1]. Aging in vascular disease is attributed to endothelial cell dysfunction [45], but VECs have been shown to respond differently than vascular endothelial cells in response to the environment [46]. Anstine et al found that VECs from aging mice display decreased NO bioavailability, EMT, cell membrane repair and proliferation, along with increased permeability of the VEC barrier. These multifactorial changes are supported by transcriptome analysis of VECs across 4 different timepoints – embryonic, postnatal, young adult, old adult [47]. It has been well established that BMP2, BMP4 and pSMAD1/5/8 are associated with aortic valve calcification [33], but a recent study by Gomez-Stallons et al demonstrated that BMP signaling is also required for aortic valve calcification in the Klotho−/− mouse model, which exhibits CAVD and premature aging associated with hyperphosphatemia. It was found that BMP signaling precedes and localizes with calcification in the aortic valve, and inhibition of BMP in VICs in vitro and in vivo prevents calcification [48]. Additional recent studies have further support the role of cadherin signaling in CAVD. Cad-11 deletion results in hyperplastic semilunar valves through inactivation of GTP-RhoA and Sox9 in VICs, but these valves do not calcify [49]. Accordingly, Sung et al investigated the potential role of Cad-11 in Rho/ROCK mediated CAVD through overexpression of Cad-11 in VEC-derived cells. Cad-11 overexpression resulted in calcification, upregulation of RhoA and Sox9, and ECM remodeling. In vitro, ROCK inhibition attenuated calcific nodule formation. Finally, examination of human aortic valves revealed increased expression of Cad-11, GTP-RhoA, and Sox9 in diseased valves. Together, this data describe a molecular pathway involving upregulation of Cad-11, Rho/ROCK and Sox9 in CAVD [50].

Conclusions

Since the seminal discovery that mutations in NOTCH1 were linked to BAV and CAVD, there has been an increase in our understanding of the genetic causes of BAV. With the continued advances in human sequencing technologies, it is anticipated that more insights into the genetic contributors of aortic valve malformations will be uncovered potentially as part of the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon), which has this as one of its goals [51]. With the discoveries of the roles of endothelial Notch1 and Gata5 in the development of BAV, it has opened new avenues of research into the mechanisms by which these genes function in valve remodeling. Additional insights into the mechanisms of CAVD have also been identified with the analysis of new mouse models, specifically the importance of VEC-VIC communication in the calcification process. Further dissection of these intercellular communications may lead to new targets for pharmacologic therapy in CAVD.

KEY POINTS.

  1. Mutations of NOTCH1 are associated with not only bicuspid aortic valve but also a spectrum of congenital cardiac malformations affecting both the left and right-sided cardiac outflow tracts in humans.

  2. Several cellular and mouse models have shown the requirement of Notch1 in endothelial cells for proper development of the aortic and pulmonary valves.

  3. Communication via multiple signaling pathways, including Notch1, between valve endothelial and valve interstitial cells is critical for the process of valve calcification.

Acknowledgments

None.

Financial Support

J.L. is supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01HL127044 and R01HL132801) and V.G. is supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01HL121797, R01HL132801 and R01HL109758).

Footnotes

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

References

* of special interest

** of outstanding interest

  • 1.Writing Group M. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38–360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miller JD, Weiss RM, Heistad DD. Calcific aortic valve stenosis: methods, models, and mechanisms. Circ Res. 2011;108(11):1392–412. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.234138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rajamannan NM. Bicuspid aortic valve disease: the role of oxidative stress in Lrp5 bone formation. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2011;20(3):168–76. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2010.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Verma S, Siu SC. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(20):1920–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1207059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Michelena HI, Prakash SK, Della Corte A, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the international bicuspid aortic valve consortium (Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium) Circulation. 2014129(25):2691–704. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lincoln J, Garg V. Etiology of valvular heart disease-genetic and developmental origins. Circ J. 2014;78(8):1801–7. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-14-0510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dhanantwari P, Lee E, Krishnan A, et al. Human cardiac development in the first trimester: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and episcopic fluorescence image capture atlas. Circulation. 2009;120(4):343–51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.796698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hinton RB, Jr, Lincoln J, Deutsch GH, et al. Extracellular matrix remodeling and organization in developing and diseased aortic valves. Circ Res. 2006;98(11):1431–8. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000224114.65109.4e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schoen FJ. Evolving concepts of cardiac valve dynamics: the continuum of development, functional structure, pathobiology, and tissue engineering. Circulation. 2008;118(18):1864–80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.805911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.LaHaye S, Lincoln J, Garg V. Genetics of valvular heart disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16(6):487. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0487-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Garg V, Muth AN, Ransom JF, et al. Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease. Nature. 2005;437(7056):270–4. doi: 10.1038/nature03940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McBride KL, Riley MF, Zender GA, et al. NOTCH1 mutations in individuals with left ventricular outflow tract malformations reduce ligand-induced signaling. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(18):2886–93. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13**.Kerstjens-Frederikse WS, van de Laar IM, Vos YJ, et al. Cardiovascular malformations caused by NOTCH1 mutations do not keep left: data on 428 probands with left-sided CHD and their families. Genet Med. 2016;18(9):914–23. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.193. This study describes the results of screening a large population of well-phenotyped individuals for mutations in NOTCH1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Blue GM, Kirk EP, Giannoulatou E, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing identifies pathogenic variants in familial congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(23):2498–506. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Theis JL, Hrstka SC, Evans JM, et al. Compound heterozygous NOTCH1 mutations underlie impaired cardiogenesis in a patient with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Hum Genet. 2015;134(9):1003–11. doi: 10.1007/s00439-015-1582-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Padang R, Bagnall RD, Richmond DR, et al. Rare non-synonymous variations in the transcriptional activation domains of GATA5 in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;53(2):277–81. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shi LM, Tao JW, Qiu XB, et al. GATA5 loss-of-function mutations associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Int J Mol Med. 2014;33(5):1219–26. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bonachea EM, Chang SW, Zender G, et al. Rare GATA5 sequence variants identified in individuals with bicuspid aortic valve. Pediatr Res. 2014;76(2):211–6. doi: 10.1038/pr.2014.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jiang JQ, Li RG, Wang J, et al. Prevalence and spectrum of GATA5 mutations associated with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 2013;165(3):570–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kassab K, Hariri H, Gharibeh L, et al. GATA5 mutation homozygosity linked to a double outlet right ventricle phenotype in a Lebanese patient. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2016;4(2):160–71. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wei D, Bao H, Liu XY, et al. GATA5 loss-of-function mutations underlie tetralogy of Fallot. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10(1):34–42. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qu XK, Qiu XB, Yuan F, et al. A novel NKX2.5 loss-of-function mutation associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(12):1891–5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23*.Quintero-Rivera F, Xi QJ, Keppler-Noreuil KM, et al. MATR3 disruption in human and mouse associated with bicuspid aortic valve, aortic coarctation and patent ductus arteriosus. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(8):2375–89. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv004. This study identifies MATR3 as a novel etiology for bicuspid aortic valve and aortic coarctation using a combination of human and mouse genetics. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24*.Luxan G, D'Amato G, MacGrogan D, de la Pompa JL. Endocardial Notch Signaling in Cardiac Development and Disease. Circ Res. 2016;118(1):e1–e18. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.305350. A comprehensive review describing our current knowledge of the roles of Notch signaling in heart development and its contribution to congenital heart disease. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee TC, Zhao YD, Courtman DW, Stewart DJ. Abnormal aortic valve development in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation. 2000;101(20):2345–8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.20.2345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bosse K, Hans CP, Zhao N, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide signaling regulates Notch1 in aortic valve disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;60:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27*.Koenig SN, Bosse K, Majumdar U, et al. Endothelial Notch1 Is Required for Proper Development of the Semilunar Valves and Cardiac Outflow Tract. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(4) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003075. This study demonstrates that Notch1 in endothelial and endothelial-derived cells is required for proper development of the semilunar valves and cardiac outflow tract using Notch1+/−; Nos3−/− mouse model. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hofmann JJ, Briot A, Enciso J, et al. Endothelial deletion of murine Jag1 leads to valve calcification and congenital heart defects associated with Alagille syndrome. Development. 2012;139(23):4449–60. doi: 10.1242/dev.084871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29**.MacGrogan D, D'Amato G, Travisano S, et al. Sequential Ligand-Dependent Notch Signaling Activation Regulates Valve Primordium Formation and Morphogenesis. Circ Res. 2016;118(10):1480–97. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.308077. Systematic demonstration of the roles of Dll4 and Jag1 in cardiac valve development using mouse models and the discovery of Hbegf as a downstream effector of Notch1 signaling during valve remodeling. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30**.Wang Y, Wu B, Farrar E, et al. Notch-Tnf signalling is required for development and homeostasis of arterial valves. Eur Heart J. 2015 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv520. This study demonstrated the requirement of Notch1 in valve endothelial cells for proper development of the aortic valve and identified Tnf signaling as a downstream mediator important for valve remodeling. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Laforest B, Andelfinger G, Nemer M. Loss of Gata5 in mice leads to bicuspid aortic valve. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2876–87. doi: 10.1172/JCI44555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32*.Mommersteeg MT, Yeh ML, Parnavelas JG, Andrews WD. Disrupted Slit-Robo signalling results in membranous ventricular septum defects and bicuspid aortic valves. Cardiovasc Res. 2015;106(1):55–66. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvv040. This study describes a new mouse model for bicuspid aortic valve in mice harboring mutant alleles in the Slit-Robo signaling pathway. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Weinberg EJ, Mack PJ, Schoen FJ, et al. Hemodynamic environments from opposing sides of human aortic valve leaflets evoke distinct endothelial phenotypes in vitro. Cardiovasc Eng. 2010;10(1):5–11. doi: 10.1007/s10558-009-9089-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wirrig EE, Yutzey KE. Conserved transcriptional regulatory mechanisms in aortic valve development and disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34(4):737–41. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ducharme V, Guauque-Olarte S, Gaudreault N, et al. NOTCH1 genetic variants in patients with tricuspid calcific aortic valve stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2013;22(2):142–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Acharya A, Hans CP, Koenig SN, et al. Inhibitory role of Notch1 in calcific aortic valve disease. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nigam V, Srivastava D. Notch1 represses osteogenic pathways in aortic valve cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;47(6):828–34. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Osman L, Yacoub MH, Latif N, et al. Role of human valve interstitial cells in valve calcification and their response to atorvastatin. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I547–52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peacock JD, Levay AK, Gillaspie DB, et al. Reduced sox9 function promotes heart valve calcification phenotypes in vivo. Circ Res. 2010;106(4):712–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.213702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40*.Huk DJ, Austin BF, Horne TE, et al. Valve Endothelial Cell-Derived Tgfbeta1 Signaling Promotes Nuclear Localization of Sox9 in Interstitial Cells Associated With Attenuated Calcification. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(2):328–38. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306091. Using in vitro and in vivo systems describes the role of Tgf-beta1 in valve endothelial cells in the process of calcification. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41*.Chen J, Ryzhova LM, Sewell-Loftin MK, et al. Notch1 Mutation Leads to Valvular Calcification Through Enhanced Myofibroblast Mechanotransduction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(7):1597–605. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.305095. Demonstrates the altered molecular responses to mechanical stimuli of Notch1 haploinsufficient aortic valve cells. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42**.Hadji F, Boulanger MC, Guay SP, et al. Altered DNA Methylation of Long Non-coding RNA H19 in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease Promotes Mineralization by Silencing NOTCH1. Circulation. 2016;134(23):1848–1862. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023116. This study describes the discovery of the role for the long non-coding RNA H19 in calcific aortic valve disease and demonstrates its mechanistic link to Notch1 signaling. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43**.Theodoris CV, Li M, White MP, et al. Human disease modeling reveals integrated transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of NOTCH1 haploinsufficiency. Cell. 2015;160(6):1072–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.035. Modeling of human NOTCH1 mutation using iPS cell methodology to uncover disease mechanisms for valve calcification. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.White MP, Theodoris CV, Liu L, et al. NOTCH1 regulates matrix gla protein and calcification gene networks in human valve endothelium. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;84:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Camici GG, Savarese G, Akhmedov A, Luscher TF. Molecular mechanism of endothelial and vascular aging: implications for cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(48):3392–403. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Butcher JT, Tressel S, Johnson T, et al. Transcriptional profiles of valvular and vascular endothelial cells reveal phenotypic differences: influence of shear stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(1):69–77. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000196624.70507.0d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47*.Anstine LJ, Bobba C, Ghadiali S, Lincoln J. Growth and maturation of heart valves leads to changes in endothelial cell distribution, impaired function, decreased metabolism and reduced cell proliferation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;100:72–82. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.10.006. Using the mouse model system, the transcriptional changes that occur in the valve endothelium during development and maturation are described. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gomez-Stallons MV, Wirrig-Schwendeman EE, Hassel KR, et al. Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling Is Required for Aortic Valve Calcification. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(7):1398–405. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bowen CJ, Zhou J, Sung DC, Butcher JT. Cadherin-11 coordinates cellular migration and extracellular matrix remodeling during aortic valve maturation. Dev Biol. 2015;407(1):145–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sung DC, Bowen CJ, Vaidya KA, et al. Cadherin-11 Overexpression Induces Extracellular Matrix Remodeling and Calcification in Mature Aortic Valves. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(8):1627–37. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Prakash SK, Bosse Y, Muehlschlegel JD, et al. A roadmap to investigate the genetic basis of bicuspid aortic valve and its complications: insights from the International BAVCon (Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(8):832–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES