Abstract
Pickering emulsion, which is an emulsion stabilized by solid particles, offers a wide range of potential applications because it generally provides a more stable system than surfactant-stabilized emulsion. Among various solid stabilizers, nanocellulose may open up new opportunities for future Pickering emulsions owing to its unique nanosizes, amphiphilicity, and other favorable properties (e.g. chemical stability, biodegradability, biocompatibility, and renewability). In this review, the preparation and properties of nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions are summarized. We also provide future perspectives on their applications, such as drug delivery, food, and composite materials.
Keywords: Pickering emulsion, nanocellulose, double emulsion, surface modification
Classification: 20 Organic and soft materials (colloids, liquid crystals, gel, polymers); 212 Surface and interfaces
1. Introduction
An emulsion is a system consisting of two immiscible liquids, in which droplets of one liquid is dispersed in another. The system is optically isotropic, typically forming nano- or micron-ordered droplets throughout the system. Hence, it offers remarkable potential for applications that need macroscopically homogeneous mixtures or efficient delivery systems (e.g. pharmaceuticals [1–3], cosmetics [3–5], food [6–8], fuel [9,10], and templates for other materials, such as porous material [11,12], liquid foam and emulsion films [13], and electrospun core–shell nanofibers and hollow nanotubes [14]). However, these nano- and micro-emulsions show poor stability in most media due to their large interfacial areas. Therefore, surfactants are typically added to stabilize the system; surfactants preferentially adsorb at immiscible liquid/liquid interfaces due to their amphiphilic properties, and suitable selection of surfactants leads to efficient reduction in the interfacial energy [14].
Solid fine particles have great potential as emulsion stabilizing agents. This type of emulsion is called Pickering emulsion [15–21]. Unlike surfactant molecules, the particles irreversibly adsorb at liquid/liquid interfaces due to their high energy of adsorption, and therefore, the Pickering emulsion generally form more stable emulsion system than that stabilized by surfactants, which could provide great versatility in material processing [22]. Equation 1 shows the change in interfacial energy, ΔE, when a solid sphere is adsorbed at the interface with a contact angle, θ,
(1) |
where r and γ ow represent the radius of the particle and oil/water interfacial tension, respectively (see Figure 1). When θ < 90°, the particle is relatively hydrophilic and the sign inside the parenthesis is negative, and when θ > 90°, it is positive. As described by Equation 1, the adsorption is the strongest when θ = 90°. The particles are strongly adsorbed at the interface, and the energy required to desorb the particle from the interface, or –ΔE, is orders of magnitude higher than that of soluble surfactants [17]. Various solid particles have been used as stabilizers for Pickering emulsions. Previous studies have dealt with fine organic or inorganic nanomaterials, including graphene oxide [23], carbon nanotube [24], carbon lamp black [25, 26], laponite [27–29], montmorillonite [30], silica nanoparticles [31–33], calcium carbonate (CaCO3) [34], titanium dioxide (TiO2) [35], magnetic particles [36, 37], and polymer particles [38–40]. Surface modification can tailor the wettability of these fine particles [19], which can effectively change the emulsion phase between oil-in-water (o/w) and water-in-oil (w/o) emulsions (continuous phases are water and oil, respectively). These unique characteristics and variability of Pickering emulsions may open up new opportunities for future emulsion-based materials.
Nanocellulose satisfies the increasing demands for a sustainable and environmentally friendly stabilizer for Pickering emulsions; nanocelluloses efficiently stabilize oil/water interfaces due to their amphiphilic surface nature, which originates from the hydrophobic face and hydrophilic edge of cellulose chains [41–43]. Nanocelluloses are typically prepared through mechanical disintegration of bundles of cellulose microfibrils. The width, length, and surface properties of nanocellulose can be controlled by changes in cellulose sources and pretreatment: mechanical treatment only [44–47] or with pretreatment, such as acid hydrolysis [48, 49], 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-mediated oxidation [50–52], carboxymethylation [53], phosphorylation [54, 55], and enzymatic hydrolysis [56–59]. Given that the original crystal structure of cellulose microfibrils [60–62] remains intact even after preparation, nanocelluloses have high modulus (130–150 GPa) [63–65] and strength (2–6 GPa) [66, 67] and low coefficient of thermal expansion (4–6 ppm K−1) [68, 69] along the c-axis. These excellent mechanical properties play an important role in structurally stabilizing the interfaces. Moreover, surface modification of nanocelluloses can tailor wettability at the oil/water interfaces.
This review summarizes recent advances in the Pickering emulsions stabilized with not only nanocelluloses, such as cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), microfibrillated celluloses (MFCs), bacterial cellulose nanofibrils (BCNs), and TEMPO-oxidized nanocelluloses, but also microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). First, we outline several approaches for the preparation of the emulsions. Second, we introduce materials based on the emulsions and discuss their potential applications, such as drug delivery, food, and composite materials.
2. Formation of nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsion
2.1. Oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion
Nanocelluloses are likely to form o/w emulsions, and the emulsions are typically prepared by mechanical treatment of the mixture of oil and nanocellulose aqueous dispersion, in which nanocelluloses are adsorbed at the oil/water interfaces [41] and stabilize the emulsion. The ability to form the Pickering emulsions is not significantly different among cellulose sources, such as wood cellulose [70–74], cotton [41, 75–78], bacterial cellulose [41, 73, 77, 79], Cladophora [77], and other plants [80, 81] (see Table 1) because native celluloses have common crystal allomorphs, collectively called cellulose I. A hydrophobic edge plane appears responsible for the wettability of CNCs at the oil/water interface [41], and this observation was also explained by molecular modeling (Figure 2) [82, 83]. Nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions exhibit good stability against coalescence. Kalashnikova et al. reported that hexadecane droplets around 4 μm in diameter are stable for several months (Figure 3) and resistant to centrifugation at 4000 g [79]. Nanocellulose-stabilized emulsions are generally stable to heating in a wide temperature range owing to their structural stability. When nanocelluloses without any surface charges are used as stabilizers, the emulsion formed shows good stability against salt and pH changes [73].
Table 1. Summary of cellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions.
Type | Cellulose source | Cellulose [surface modification] | Disperse phase | Continuous phase | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
o/w | Bacterial cellulose | CNC | Hexadecane, Styrene | Water | Kalashnikova et al. [79] |
Bacterial cellulose, Cotton | CNC | Hexadecane, Styrene | Water | Kalashnikova et al. [41] | |
Cotton | CNC | Styrene | Water | Nypelö et al. [75] | |
Cotton | CNC | Hexadecane | Water | Capron and Cathala [76] | |
Corncob | CNC | D-limonene | Water | Wen et al. [81] | |
Cotton, Bacterial cellulose, Cladophora | CNC | Hexadecane, Styrene | Water | Kalashnikova et al. [77] | |
Softwood sulfite pulp, Cotton | CNC, NFC | Hexadecane | Water | Cunha et al. [78] | |
Wood pulp | CNC, NFC, TOCN | Dodecane | Water | Gestranius et al. [70] | |
Wood pulp | CNF/NFC | Hexadecane/IPDI/DBDL | Water | Svagan et al. [71] | |
Wood cellulose | MCC | Sunflower oil | Water | Kargar et al. [72] | |
Bacterial cellulose, Wood cellulose | BCN, MCC, MFC | Vegetable oil, Kerosene | Water | Ougiya et al. [73] | |
Mangosteen rind | MFC | Soybean oil | Water | Winuprasith and Suphantharika [80] | |
Softwood sulfite pulp | TOCN | Paraffin | Water | Li et al. [82] | |
Wood pulp | TOCN | Styrene | Water | Fujisawa et al. [74] | |
Cotton | CNC [VAc, VCin] | Ethyl acetate, Toluene, Cyclohexane | Water | Sèbe et al. [84] | |
Cotton | CNC [CTAB, DMAB] | Dodecane | Water | Hu et al. [91] | |
Ramie fiber | CNC [Poly(NIPAM)] | Heptane | Water | Zoppe et al. [85] | |
Wood pulp | CNC [PDMAEMA] | Heptane, Toluene | Water | Tang et al. [86] | |
w/o | Cotton | CNC [CTAB, DMAB] | Water | Dodecane | Hu et al. [91] |
Cotton, Softwood sulfite pulp | NFC, CNC [Lauroyl chloride] | Water | Hexadecane | Cunha et al. [78] | |
Softwood sulfite pulp | MFC [CDMIPS] | Water | Toluene | Andresen and Stenius [87] | |
Softwood pulp | MFC [CDMIPS] | Water | Toluene | Xhanari et al. [88] | |
Softwood pulp | MFC [Octadecylamine, Poly(St-co-MA)] | Water | FT-diesel | Lif et al. [89] | |
Bacterial cellulose | BCN [AA, HA, DA] | Water | Toluene | Lee et al. [90] |
CNC: cellulose nanocrystal. NFC: nanofibrillated cellulose. TOCN: TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril. MCC: microcrystalline cellulose. MFC: microfibrillated cellulose. BCN: bacterial cellulose nanofibrils. IPDI: Isophorone diisocyanate. DBDI: dibutyltin dilaurate. VAc: vinyl acetate. VCin: vinyl cinnamate. CTAB: cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. DMAB: didecyldimethylammonium bromide. Poly(NIPAM): Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). PDMAEMA: poly[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate]. CDMIPS: chlorodimethyl isopropylsilane. Poly(St-co-MA): Poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride). FT-diesel: Fischer–Tropsch diesel. AA: acetic acid. HA: hexanoic acid. DA: dodecanoic acid.
Surface charges of nanocelluloses play an important role in the stability of the emulsions. When surface-carboxylated nanocelluloses that are prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation are used as stabilizers, the nanocelluloses form stable emulsions [74]. The repulsive forces between the droplets arise primarily from osmotic pressure caused by the carboxyl groups. Gestranius et al. compared the phase behavior of the emulsions between the nanocelluloses with or without surface carboxyl groups, and they reported that the surface charges effectively enhance stability (Figure 4) [70]. Kalashnikova et al. reported that CNCs with a surface charge density above 0.03 e/nm2 are unable to efficiently stabilize at the oil/water interface, regardless of cellulose sources [41].
Kalashnikova et al. found that aspect ratios of CNCs influence the behavior of emulsion formation [77]; densely covered emulsion surfaces are formed by short nanocrystals, whereas low covered surfaces are formed by long CNCs, and the aspect ratios range from 13 to 160. They estimated that a dense interconnected network is promoted when long CNCs are used, thereby leading to stability at low concentrations. By increasing the nanocellulose concentration, stability to creaming is significantly improved due to the dense network structure [80].
Even after some surface modifications, the modified nanocelluloses can form o/w emulsions. CNCs esterified by vinyl acetate form ethyl acetate-in-water, toluene-in-water, and cyclohexane-in-water emulsion systems, whereas CNCs esterified by vinyl cinnamate stabilize only cyclohexane-in-water emulsions [84]. Therefore, phase behavior of the nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions can be changed by controlling the surface properties. When poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (poly(NIPAM)) chains are grafted onto CNC surfaces, the formed emulsion shows no phase separation and is stable for more than 4 months, whereas unmodified CNCs are unable to stabilize the emulsion system [85]. The emulsions are stable at ambient conditions, but they break after heating at a temperature above the lower critical solution temperature of poly(NIPAM). pH-responsive CNC-stabilized Pickering emulsions can be formed by grafting a weak polyelectrolyte poly[2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate] (PDMAEMA) [86]. Chain conformation of the PDMAEMA chains varies with pH and triggers the emulsification and demulsification of oil droplets.
2.2. Water-in-oil (w/o) emulsion
Hydrophobic/hydrophilic surface properties of nanocellulose may be altered by surface modifications, and suitable surface hydrophobization leads to phase inversion of the Pickering emulsions from o/w to w/o ones. Stenius et al. investigated the stability of w/o emulsions using MFCs hydrophobized with chlorodimethyl isopropylsilane and varying degrees of surface substitution [87, 88]. The hydrophobized MFCs formed stable water-in-toluene emulsions and showed better stability against sedimentation with increasing MFC concentration most likely due to an increase in the viscosity of the continuous oil phase. The hydrophobized MFCs demonstrated optimum substitution conditions for stabilization; a high degree of surface substitution leads to less stability of the emulsions, and they concluded that hydrophobized MFCs with contact angles at ~90° at the interface exhibit good stability, as indicated by a theoretical prediction (Equation 1). A w/o Pickering emulsion of Fischer–Tropsch diesel droplet can be prepared, and optimized surface hydrophobicity of MFCs effectively stabilizes the emulsion (Figure 5) [89].
Lee et al. controlled the surface hydrophobicity of BCNs by changing the grafted chain length (acetic acid, C2-; hexanoic acid, C6-; dodecanoic acid,C12-); the BCNs grafted with long hydrophobic chains, C6- and C12- acid, form stable w/o Pickering emulsion [90]. Hu et al. finely tailored the emulsion phase by modifying the surfaces with cationic alkyl ammonium surfactants didecyldimethylammonium bromide (DMAB) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) [91]. The addition of the surfactants was found to increase the emulsion stability and decrease the droplet size. Interestingly, the emulsion showed double phase inversion from o/w to w/o and back to o/w ones with increasing amounts of DMAB; the first phase inversion was caused by the surface hydrophobization of the CNCs by DMAB, and at the second, the stabilization by DMAB became dominant in the system due to the high concentration.
2.3. Double emulsions
Double emulsions are complex systems known as an emulsion within an emulsion. Droplets in a dispersed phase contain smaller droplets of different emulsion systems inside. The two major types are oil-in-water-in-oil (o/w/o) or water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) emulsions. The systems typically require two different types of surfactants (solid particles for Pickering emulsions): one preferring water and one preferring oil. As described above, the surface of nanocelluloses can be finely tailored by chemical modification, and double emulsion systems can be realized via combinations of unmodified and modified nanocelluloses. An o/w/o double emulsion prepared by a combination of unmodified and chemically modified nanocelluloses was reported by Cunha et al. (Figure 6) [78]. The size of the double emulsion ranged from 43 to 76 μm, in which the o/w emulsion system containing oil droplets of ~3 μm was successfully encapsulated. The o/w/o double emulsion exhibited good stability over a month. Upon centrifugation, the emulsion resisted up to 5000 relative centrifugal forces without disruption. Frank et al. showed that MCCs function as stabilizers in w/o/w emulsions containing oil-soluble surfactants [92, 93].
3. Applications
The structural stability and biocompatibility of the nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions demonstrate potential in drug delivery applications. Jain et al. investigated the drug release rate of MCC-stabilized w/o/w double emulsions, in which MCC acted as a stabilizer for both the internal and external layers [94]. The emulsion showed a slow release rate when the MCC concentration in the internal phase was increased, and this phenomenon was likely due to diffusion control by a viscous MCC network. The release rate was not significantly affected by the pH of the external medium because MCCs show good stability against pH. Moreover, the emulsion showed small drug leakage less than 10% and good stability without any recognizable phase separation upon storage over a period of 90 days. MCC-stabilized w/o/w emulsion also show drug release properties, as reported by Oza and Frank [93]. A novel drug delivery system was developed by Abdalla et al., who mixed a self-emulsifying lipid with MCCs to obtain pellets for improving drug delivery [95]. In the presence of the MCC, the pellets displayed a uniform size and shape and showed good stability.
The o/w Pickering emulsion stabilized by food-grade MCC offers the potential for food application. Kargar et al. investigated the oxidative stability of sunflower oil in the emulsion, and they found out that MCC enhances stability by significantly reducing the lipid oxidation rate; thus, MCC is more effective than modified starch [72]. The charge, size, and concentration of MCC play an important role in the stability. They concluded that this effect can be ascribed to the unique MCC characteristics, such as ability to scavenge free radicals and form a thick layer around oil droplets.
Nanocellulose/polymer nanocomposite films can be prepared by simply polymerizing monomer droplets of nanocellulose-stabilized o/w Pickering emulsions, which is conducted in a similar way to conventional suspension polymerization. This process is a simple and environmentally friendly aqueous one, in which nanocelluloses work both as stabilizer and nanofillers in the emulsion and polymer composite, respectively. Poly(styrene-co-hexylacrylate)/cellulose whisker nanocomposites can be prepared through this process, but a low amount of reactive silane (methacryloxypropyl triethoxysilane) is added to efficiently avoid particle agglomeration [96]; the composite films are obtained by casting and drying the homogeneous dispersion of the cellulose nanowhiskers and polymer particles, and the films show enhanced storage modulus above the glass transition region of the polymer matrix by 500% due to reinforcement by the cellulose nanowhiskers. Gindl-Altmutter et al. used lignocellulose, which is partially delignified wood, as stabilizers [97, 98]. The lignocellulose provided good stabilization of the emulsion system, and this feature was likely due to the enhanced amphiphilic surface chemical character caused by residual hemicellulose and lignin. Transparent nanocellulose/polystyrene nanocomposite films were prepared by hot-pressing treatment after polymerization (Figure 7) [74] using a surface-carboxylated nanocellulose prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation as a stabilizer. The mechanical properties were comparable with those of a nanocellulose/polystyrene nanocomposite prepared by solvent casting and drying of nanocellulose/polystyrene mixture in N,N-dimethylformamide [99]. Using this process, finely organized nanocellulose/poly(methyl methacrylate) [100] and nano-fibrillated chitin/acrylic resin [101] composites were prepared.
Porous and lightweight cellulosic foams can be synthesized by templating the Pickering high internal phase emulsions (HIPEs) [102, 103], in which the stiff network structure of nanocelluloses allows the formation of stable o/w [76] or w/o [90] HIPE systems, with less than 0.1 wt.% of nanocelluloses (Figure 8) [76]. Lightweight cellulosic foams were prepared by simply freeze-drying a CNC-stabilized o/w emulsion, and the entire foam shape and internal structure were preserved due to the excellent mechanical properties of the CNC [104]. The process is facile and easy to handle, and the rigidity of the materials can be controlled by adjusting the concentration of CNCs in the aqueous phase of the starting emulsions. Moreover, further treatment by chitosan mechanically reinforces the foams. Blaker et al. formed a w/o HIPE using a modified soybean oil as the oil phase. After polymerizing the oil phase, porous and fully renewable nanocellulose/polymer composite foams with porosities as high as 76% or 69% were successfully prepared (Figure 9) [105]. Based on the emulsion templating technique, air/water interfaces were also stabilized using surface-hydrophobized nanocelluloses, and lightweight and strong cellulose materials were prepared after drying [106]. In the study, nanocelluloses effectively stabilize the interface and show better stability against coalescence due to their high adsorption energy compared with surfactants. After careful drying under ambient condition, porous cellulose materials with a porosity of 98% and a density of 30 mg cm−3 are successfully synthesized, and the materials have high Young’s modulus and compressive energy absorption.
When a magnetically modified CNC (CNCs‒CoFe2O4) is used as a stabilizer, the CNCs‒CoFe2O4 densely cover the surface of polymer microbeads, and the hybrid microbeads show favorable magnetoresponsive properties [75]. The microparticles effectively adsorb a cationic dye in water, and they can be removed from media via magnetic separation. Furthermore, CNCs‒CoFe2O4 hollow microcapsules are produced by dissolving the polymer core. Svagan et al. developed a rapid and facile way to prepare liquid-core capsules with high mechanical stability by covalently cross-linking (by aromatic diisocyanate) the nanocellulose layer of o/w Pickering emulsions [71]. The elastic modulus of the nanocellulose layers increased, and the microcapsules showed enhanced structural stability.
Li et al. showed a new way to prepare thermal storage materials based on nanocellulose-stabilized o/w Pickering emulsions (Figure 10) [82]. Nanocellulose allowed high content of paraffin encapsulation (more than 72 wt.%) caused by the good emulsifying properties. Upon heating, the encapsulated paraffin underwent phase change with high thermal absorption mainly due to melting of the paraffin, without leakage during heating/cooling cycles. Therefore, the material showed excellent thermal regulation performance.
Ultrafine CNC-poly(lactic acid) (PLA) composite fibers can be fabricated by electrospinning of a CNC-stabilized w/o emulsion (Figure 11) [107]. Interestingly, the fiber structure can be tuned from a core‒shell/hollow structure to a core‒shell structure by changing the starting emulsion size from larger (average size: 6 μm) to smaller (3 μm) ones, respectively. In the composite fiber, CNCs function as nucleating and reinforcing agents. Therefore, random fiber mats prepared from CNC-PLA exhibit higher Young’s modulus and maximum tensile strength than PLA random fiber mats.
4. Future prospects
The excellent stability and biocompatibility of the nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions offer major advantages in drug delivery or food applications. Given these characteristics, the emulsions can be extended to many other applications such as cosmetics and paints. By templating the unique emulsion structure, well-organized nanocellulose-based polymer composite materials (e.g. films, microparticles, and foams) can be fabricated. These materials combine good mechanical properties and environmentally friendly characteristics. Therefore, they are of great interest in many fields such as food packaging films, separation/purification, and biomedical applications. The main challenge in developing these materials is how to maintain the stability of the Pickering emulsion; there is no sufficient understanding of how a multicomponent solvent system can affect the stability. On the other hand, many fundamental studies on the stability of nanocellulose have been reported, and we expect that the understanding in the field could allow the development of novel Pickering emulsion-based material.
The preparation processes are facile and easy to handle because they are conducted in aqueous solutions, where nanocelluloses are well dispersed and do not require any time-consuming solvent exchanging process. Therefore, material fabrication based on the nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions paves way toward novel bio-based materials with a facile and scalable process.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
References
- [1]. Anton N, Benoit JP, Saulnier P. Design and production of nanoparticles formulated from nano-emulsion templates - a review. J Control Release. 2008;128:185. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2]. McClements DJ, Decker EA, Weiss J. Emulsion-based delivery systems for lipophilioc bioactive components. J Food Sci. 2007;72:R109. 10.1111/jfds.2007.72.issue-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3]. Gutierrez JM, Gonzalez C, Maestro A, et al. . Nano-emulsions: New applications and optimization of their preparation. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2008;13:245. 10.1016/j.cocis.2008.01.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [4]. Pardeike J, Hommoss A, Muller RH. Lipid nanoparticles (SLN, NLC) in cosmetic and pharmaceutical dermal products. Int J Pharm. 2009;366:170. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5]. Muller RH, Radtke M, Wissing SA. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostruct lipid carriers (nlc) in cosmetic and dermatological preparations. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2002;54:S131. 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00118-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6]. McClements DJ, Decker EA. Lipid oxidation in oil-in-water emulsions: Impact of molecular environment on chemical reactions in heterogeneous food systems. J Food Sci. 2000;65:1270. 10.1111/jfds.2000.65.issue-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [7]. Dickinson E. Milk protein interfacial layers and the relationship to emulsion stability and rheology. Colloids Surf B. 2001;20:197. 10.1016/S0927-7765(00)00204-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8]. Guzey D, McClements DJ. Formation, stability and properties of multilayer emulsions for application in the food industry. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;128:227. 10.1016/j.cis.2006.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9]. Sjoblom J, Aske N, Auflem IH, et al. . Our current understanding of water-in-crude oil emulsions. Recent characterization techniques and high pressure performance. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2003;100:399. 10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00066-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [10]. Kadota T, Yamasaki H. Recent advances in the combustion of water fuel emulsion. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2002;28:385. 10.1016/S0360-1285(02)00005-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [11]. Zhang HF, Cooper AI. Synthesis and applications of emulsion-templated porous materials. Soft Matter. 2005;1:107. 10.1039/b502551f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12]. Silverstein MS. PolyHIPEs: Recent advances in emulsion-templated porous polymers. Prog Polym Sci. 2014;39:199. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [13]. Stubenrauch C, von Klitzing R. Disjoining pressure in thin liquid foam and emulsion films - new concepts and perspectives. J Phys Condens Matter. 2003;15:R1197. 10.1088/0953-8984/15/27/201 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [14]. Silverstein MS. PolyHIPEs: Recent advances in emulsion-templated porous polymers. Prog Polym Sci. 2014;39:199. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [15]. Israelachvili JN. Intermolecular and surface forces. 3rd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- [16]. Pickering SU. Emulsions. J Chem Soc. 1907;91:2001. 10.1039/CT9079102001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [17]. Ramsden W. Separation of solids in the surface-layers of solutions and ‘suspensions’ (observations on surface-membranes, bubbles, emulsions, and mechanical coagulation). Proc R Soc London. 1903;72:156. 10.1098/rspl.1903.0034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [18]. Binks BP. Particles as surfactants - similarities and differences. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2002;7:21. 10.1016/S1359-0294(02)00008-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [19]. Aveyard R, Binks BP, Clint JH. Emulsions stabilised solely by colloidal particles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2003;100:503. 10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00069-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [20]. Chevalier Y, Bolzinger MA. Emulsions stabilized with solid nanoparticles: Pickering emulsions. Colloids Surf A. 2013;439:23. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.02.054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [21]. Dickinson E. Food emulsions and foams: Stabilization by particles. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2010;15:40. 10.1016/j.cocis.2009.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [22]. Dickinson E. Use of nanoparticles and microparticles in the formation and stabilization of food emulsions. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2012;24:4. 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.09.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [23]. Levine S, Bowen BD, Partridge SJ. Stabilization of emulsions by fine particles .1. Partitioning of particles between continuous phase and oil-water interface. Colloids Surf. 1989;38:325. 10.1016/0166-6622(89)80271-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [24]. Kim J, Cote LJ, Kim F, et al. . Graphene oxide sheets at interfaces. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:8180. 10.1021/ja102777p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25]. Wang H, Hobbie EK. Amphiphobic carbon nanotubes as macroemulsion surfactants. Langmuir. 2003;19:3091. 10.1021/la026883k [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [26]. Moore WC. Emulsification of water and of ammonium chloride solutions by means of lamp black. J Am Chem Soc. 1919;41:940. 10.1021/ja02227a004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [27]. Gelot A, Friesen W, Hamza HA. Emulsification of oil and water in the presence of finely divided solids and surface-active agents. Colloids Surf. 1984;12:271. 10.1016/0166-6622(84)80105-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [28]. Ashby NP, Binks BP. Pickering emulsions stabilised by laponite clay particles. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2000;2:5640. 10.1039/b007098j [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [29]. Cauvin S, Colver PJ, Bon SAF. Pickering stabilized miniemulsion polymerization: Preparation of clay armored latexes. Macromolecules. 2005;38:7887. 10.1021/ma051070z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [30]. Bon SAF, Colver PJ. Pickering miniemulsion polymerization using laponite clay as a stabilizer. Langmuir. 2007;23:8316. 10.1021/la701150q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31]. Tsugita A, Takemoto S, Mori K, et al. . Studies on o/w emulsions stabilized with insoluble montmorillonite-organic complexes. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1983;95:551. 10.1016/0021-9797(83)90214-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [32]. Binks BP, Horozov TS. Aqueous foams stabilized solely by silica nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:3722. 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33]. Binks BP, Whitby CP. Nanoparticle silica-stabilised oil-in-water emulsions: Improving emulsion stability. Colloids Surf A. 2005;253:105. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.10.116 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [34]. Midmore BR. Preparation of a novel silica-stabilized oil/water emulsion. Colloids Surf A. 1998;132:257. 10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00094-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [35]. Cui ZG, Shi KZ, Cui YZ, et al. . Double phase inversion of emulsions stabilized by a mixture of CaCO3 nanoparticles and sodium dodecyl sulphate. Colloids Surf A. 2008;329:67. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.06.049 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [36]. Chen T, Colver PJ, Bon SAF. Organic-inorganic hybrid hollow spberes prepared from TiO2-stabilized pickering emulsion polymerization. Adv Mater. 2007;19:2286. 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4095 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [37]. Lan Q, Liu C, Yang F, et al. . Synthesis of bilayer oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their application in pH-responsive Pickering emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;310:260. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.01.081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38]. Melle S, Lask M, Fuller GG. Pickering emulsions with controllable stability. Langmuir. 2005;21:2158. 10.1021/la047691n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39]. Binks BP, Lumsdon SO. Pickering emulsions stabilized by monodisperse latex particles: Effects of particle size. Langmuir. 2001;17:4540. 10.1021/la0103822 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [40]. Gautier F, Destribats M, Perrier-Cornet R, et al. . Pickering emulsions with stimulable particles: From highly- to weakly-covered interfaces. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2007;9:6455. 10.1039/b710226g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41]. Tarimala S, Dai LL. Structure of microparticles in solid-stabilized emulsions. Langmuir. 2004;20:3492. 10.1021/la036129e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42]. Kalashnikova I, Bizot H, Cathala B, et al. . Modulation of cellulose nanocrystals amphiphilic properties to stabilize oil/water interface. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:267. 10.1021/bm201599j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43]. Glasser WG, Atalla RH, Blackwell J, et al. . About the structure of cellulose: Debating the Lindman hypothesis. Cellulose. 2012;19:589. 10.1007/s10570-012-9691-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [44]. Alqus R, Eichhorn SJ, Bryce RA. Molecular dynamics of cellulose amphiphilicity at the graphene-water interface. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16:1771. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45]. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR. Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product-properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polm Sci Appl Polym Symp. 1983;37:815. [Google Scholar]
- [46]. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, et al. . Microfibrillated cellulose: Morpholoby and accessibility. J Appl Polm Sci Appl Polym Symp. 1983;37:797. [Google Scholar]
- [47]. Taniguchi T, Okamura K. New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres. Polym Int. 1998;47:291. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0126 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [48]. Abe K, Iwamoto S, Yano H. Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:3276. 10.1021/bm700624p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49]. Ranby BG. Aqueous colloidal solutions of cellulose micelles. Acta Chem Scand. 1949;3:649. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.03-0649 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [50]. Ranby BG. Cellulose and muscle - the colloidal properties of cellulose micelles. Discuss Faraday Soc. 1951;11:158. [Google Scholar]
- [51]. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, et al. . Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:1687. 10.1021/bm060154s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52]. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale. 2011;3:71. 10.1039/C0NR00583E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53]. Okita Y, Saito T, Isogai A. Entire surface oxidation of various cellulose microfibrils by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:1696. 10.1021/bm100214b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54]. Wågberg L, Decher G, Norgren M, et al. . The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir. 2008;24:784. 10.1021/la702481v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55]. Ghanadpour M, Carosio F, Larsson PT, et al. . Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibrils: A renewable nanomaterial for the preparation of intrinsically flame-retardant materials. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16:3399. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56]. Noguchi Y, Homma I, Matsubara Y. Complete nanofibrillation of cellulose prepared by phosphorylation. Cellulose. 2017;24:1295. 10.1007/s10570-017-1191-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [57]. Yarbrough JM, Zhang RR, Mittal A, et al. . Multifunctional cellulolytic enzymes outperform processive fungal cellulases for coproduction of nanocellulose and biofuels. ACS Nano. 2017;11:3101. 10.1021/acsnano.7b00086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58]. Janardhnan S, Sain MM. Isolation of cellulose microfibrils - an enzymatic approach. Bioresources. 2006;1:176. [Google Scholar]
- [59]. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, et al. . Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60]. Hayashi N, Kondo T, Ishihara M. Enzymatically produced nano-ordered short elements containing cellulose I-beta crystalline domains. Carbohydr Polym. 2005;61:191. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.04.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [61]. Sugiyama J, Vuong R, Chanzy H. Electron diffraction study on the two crystalline phases occurring in native cellulose from an algal cell wall. Macromolecules. 1991;24:4168. 10.1021/ma00014a033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [62]. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H. Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron x-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:9074. 10.1021/ja0257319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63]. Nishiyama Y, Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, et al. . Crystal structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose Iα from synchrotron x-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:14300. 10.1021/ja037055w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64]. Sakurada I, Nukushina Y, Ito T. Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers. J Polym Sci. 1962;57:651. 10.1002/pol.1962.1205716551 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [65]. Sturcova A, Davies GR, Eichhorn SJ. Elastic modulus and stress-transfer properties of tunicate cellulose whiskers. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6:1055. 10.1021/bm049291k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66]. Iwamoto S, Kai W, Isogai A, et al. . Elastic modulus of single cellulose microfibrils from tunicate measured by atomic force microscopy. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:2571. 10.1021/bm900520n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67]. Wu XW, Moon RJ, Martini A. Tensile strength of Iβ crystalline cellulose predicted by molecular dynamics simulation. Cellulose. 2014;21:2233. 10.1007/s10570-014-0325-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [68]. Saito T, Kuramae R, Wohlert J, et al. . An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: The strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:248. 10.1021/bm301674e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69]. Hori R, Wada M. The thermal expansion of wood cellulose crystals. Cellulose. 2005;12:479. 10.1007/s10570-005-5967-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [70]. Diaz JA, Wu XW, Martini A, et al. . Thermal expansion of self-organized and shear-oriented cellulose nanocrystal films. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:2900. 10.1021/bm400794e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71]. Gestranius M, Stenius P, Kontturi E, et al. . Phase behaviour and droplet size of oil-in-water Pickering emulsions stabilised with plant-derived nanocellulosic materials. Colloids Surf A. 2017;519:60. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.04.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [72]. Svagan AJ, Musyanovych A, Kappl M, et al. . Cellulose nanofiber/nanocrystal reinforced capsules: A fast and facile approach toward assembly of liquid-core capsules with high mechanical stability. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:1852. 10.1021/bm500232h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73]. Kargar M, Fayazmanesh K, Alavi M, et al. . Investigation into the potential ability of Pickering emulsions (food-grade particles) to enhance the oxidative stability of oil-in-water emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;366:209. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.09.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74]. Ougiya H, Watanabe K, Morinaga Y, et al. . Emulsion-stabilizing effect of bacterial cellulose. Biosci Biotech Bioch. 1997;61:1541. 10.1271/bbb.61.1541 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [75]. Fujisawa S, Togawa E, Kuroda K. Facile route to transparent, strong, and thermally stable nanocellulose/polymer nanocomposites from an aqueous Pickering emulsion. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18:266. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76]. Nypelö T, Rodriguez-Abreu C, Kolen’ko YV, et al. . Microbeads and hollow microcapsules obtained by self-assembly of Pickering magneto-responsive cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:16851. 10.1021/am504260u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77]. Capron I, Cathala B. Surfactant-free high internal phase emulsions stabilized by cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:291. 10.1021/bm301871k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78]. Kalashnikova I, Bizot H, Bertoncini P, et al. . Cellulosic nanorods of various aspect ratios for oil in water Pickering emulsions. Soft Matter. 2013;9:952. 10.1039/C2SM26472B [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [79]. Cunha AG, Mougel JB, Cathala B, et al. . Preparation of double Pickering emulsions stabilized by chemically tailored nanocelluloses. Langmuir. 2014;30:9327. 10.1021/la5017577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80]. Kalashnikova I, Bizot H, Cathala B, et al. . New Pickering emulsions stabilized by bacterial cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir. 2011;27:7471. 10.1021/la200971f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81]. Winuprasith T, Suphantharika M. Properties and stability of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by microfibrillated cellulose from mangosteen rind. Food Hydrocolloid. 2015;43:690. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.07.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [82]. Wen CX, Yuan QP, Liang H, et al. . Preparation and stabilization of D-limonene Pickering emulsions by cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;112:695. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83]. Li Y, Yu S, Chen P, et al. . Cellulose nanofibers enable paraffin encapsulation and the formation of stable thermal regulation nanocomposites. Nano Energy. 2017;34:541. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [84]. Miyamoto H, Rein DM, Ueda K, et al. . Molecular dynamics simulation of cellulose-coated oil-in-water emulsions. Cellulose. 2017;24:2699. 10.1007/s10570-017-1290-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [85]. Sèbe G, Ham-Pichavant F, Pecastaings G. Dispersibility and emulsion-stabilizing effect of cellulose nanowhiskers esterified by vinyl acetate and vinyl cinnamate. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:2937. 10.1021/bm400854n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86]. Zoppe JO, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ. Pickering emulsions stabilized by cellulose nanocrystals grafted with thermo-responsive polymer brushes. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;369:202. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87]. Tang JT, Lee MFX, Zhang W, et al. . Dual responsive Pickering emulsion stabilized by poly[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate] grafted cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:3052. 10.1021/bm500663w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88]. Andresen M, Stenius P. Water-in-oil emulsions stabilized by hydrophobized microfibrillated cellulose. J Dispers Sci Technol. 2007;28:837. 10.1080/01932690701341827 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [89]. Xhanari K, Syverud K, Stenius P. Emulsions stabilized by microfibrillated cellulose: The effect of hydrophobization, concentration and o/w ratio. J Dispers Sci Technol. 2011;32:447. 10.1080/01932691003658942 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [90]. Lif A, Stenstad P, Syverud K, et al. . Fischer-tropsch diesel emulsions stabilised by microfibrillated cellulose and nonionic surfactants. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2010;352:585. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91]. Lee KY, Blaker JJ, Murakami R, et al. . Phase behavior of medium and high internal phase water-in-oil emulsions stabilized solely by hydrophobized bacterial cellulose nanofibrils. Langmuir. 2014;30:452. 10.1021/la4032514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92]. Hu Z, Ballinger S, Pelton R, et al. . Surfactant-enhanced cellulose nanocrystal Pickering emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;439:139. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.10.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93]. Oza KP, Frank SG. Multiple emulsions stabilized by colloidal microcrystalline cellulose. J Dispers Sci Technol. 1989;10:163. 10.1080/01932698908943168 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [94]. Oza KP, Frank SG. Drug release from emulsions stabilized by colloidal microcrystalline cellulose. J Dispers Sci Technol. 1989;10:187. 10.1080/01932698908943169 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [95]. Khopade AJ, Jain NK. A stable multiple emulsion system bearing isoniazid: Preparation and characterization. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1998;24:289. 10.3109/03639049809085622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96]. Abdalla A, Klein S, Mädder K. A new self-emulsifying drug delivery system (sedds) for poorly soluble drugs: Characterization, dissolution, in vitro digestion and incorporation into solid pellets. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2008;35:457. 10.1016/j.ejps.2008.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97]. Elmabrouk AB, Wim T, Dufresne A, et al. . Preparation of poly(styrene-co-hexylacrylate)/cellulose whiskers nanocomposites via miniemulsion polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci. 2009;114:2946. 10.1002/app.v114:5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [98]. Ballner D, Herzele S, Keckes J, et al. . Lignocellulose nanofiber-reinforced polystyrene produced from composite microspheres obtained in suspension polymerization shows superior mechanical performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:13520. 10.1021/acsami.6b01992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99]. Yan YT, Herzele S, Mahendran AR, et al. . Microfibrillated lignocellulose enables the suspension-polymerisation of unsaturated polyester resin for novel composite applications. Polymers. 2016;8:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100]. Fujisawa S, Ikeuchi T, Takeuchi M, et al. . Superior reinforcement effect of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils in polystyrene matrix: Optical, thermal, and mechanical studies. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:2188. 10.1021/bm300609c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101]. Kedzior SA, Marway HS, Cranston ED. Tailoring cellulose nanocrystal and surfactant behavior in miniemulsion polymerization. Macromolecules. 2017;50:2645. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00516 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [102]. Shams MI, Yano H. Doubly curved nanofiber-reinforced optically transparent composites. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103]. Colver PJ, Bon SAF. Cellular polymer monoliths made via Pickering high internal phase emulsions. Chem Mater. 2007;19:1537. 10.1021/cm0628810 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [104]. Ikem VO, Menner A, Bismarck A. Tailoring the mechanical performance of highly permeable macroporous polymers synthesized via Pickering emulsion templating. Soft Matter. 2011;7:6571. 10.1039/c1sm05272a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [105]. Tasset S, Cathala B, Bizot H, et al. . Versatile cellular foams derived from CNC-stabilized Pickering emulsions. RSC Adv. 2014;4:893. 10.1039/C3RA45883K [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [106]. Blaker JJ, Lee KY, Li XX, et al. . Renewable nanocomposite polymer foams synthesized from Pickering emulsion templates. Green Chem. 2009;11:1321. 10.1039/b913740h [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [107]. Cervin NT, Andersson L, Ng JBS, et al. . Lightweight and strong cellulose materials made from aqueous foams stabilized by nanofibrillated cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:503. 10.1021/bm301755u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108]. Li YJ, Ko FK, Hamad WY. Effects of emulsion droplet size on the structure of electrospun ultrafine biocomposite fibers with cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:3801. 10.1021/bm400540v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]