Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2018 Jan 25;6(4):e01498-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01498-17

Nuclear, Chloroplast, and Mitochondrial Genome Sequences of the Prospective Microalgal Biofuel Strain Picochlorum soloecismus

C Raul Gonzalez-Esquer a, Scott N Twary a, Blake T Hovde a, Shawn R Starkenburg a,
PMCID: PMC5786678  PMID: 29371352

ABSTRACT

Picochlorum soloecismus is a halotolerant, fast-growing, and moderate-lipid-producing microalga that is being evaluated as a renewable feedstock for biofuel production. Herein, we report on an improved high-quality draft assembly and annotation for the nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial genomes of P. soloecismus DOE 101.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Picochlorum soloecismus (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta) was isolated during the bioprospecting efforts of the National Alliance for Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts (NAABB) consortium (1), after it outcompeted Nannochloropsis salina CCMP1776 in mixed cultures subjected to heat stress at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. In general, Picochlorum strains have high growth rates, are halotolerant, can grow at temperatures ranging from 18 to 35°C, and may accumulate moderate amounts of lipids and carbohydrates (26). Phylogenetically, P. soloecismus is most closely related to the type species Picochlorum oculatum and Nanochlorum eucaryotum (99% 18S rRNA similarity). The fully sequenced genome from Picochlorum sp. strain SENEW3 showed compactness (genome size, 13.5 Mbp; 7,367 genes) and gene clustering (7, 8). The aforementioned characteristics make it a promising candidate for biotechnological use. Physiological characterization of P. soloecismus has so far demonstrated its capacity to grow under simulated outdoor pond conditions (to replicate the climate of Key West, FL) for up to 30 days (9). Others have also reported that P. soloecismus is amenable to genetic engineering (1).

P. soloecismus DOE 101 genomic DNA was extracted and purified using the Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) midi plant DNA kit. Rapidly growing cells from 200 ml of culture (optical density at 750 nm, 2.0) were lysed by heating to 95°C for 5 min in the lysis buffer. The supernatant containing the DNA was purified according to the manufacturer’s directions for the kit. DNA was sequenced to 470× and 27× average genome coverage using Illumina (10) and 454 pyrosequencing (11), respectively. The 454 reads were assembled with Newbler version 2.3, and the resulting consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 2-kb overlapping fake reads (shreds). The 100-bp Illumina sequencing reads were assembled with Velvet version 1.0.13 (12), and the consensus sequence was computationally shredded into 1.5-kb overlapping shreds. The consensus shreds generated from Newbler and Velvet were combined into a single assembly using parallel Phrap version 1.080812 (High Performance Software LLC). Finally, the Illumina reads were used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using the software Polisher (A. Lapidus, unpublished data), and misassemblies were corrected using gapResolution (C. Han, unpublished data) or Dupfinisher (13). Postassembly, the genome was annotated with Maker (14) using assembled transcripts from a nitrogen deprivation time-course study (S. N. Twary, unpublished data). Annotation generated 7,844 gene models.

The final genome assembly contains 56 contigs, with a maximum contig size of 496 kbp, an assembly size of 15.2 Mbp, and an average GC content of 46%. The mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes are fully assembled into 38.7-kbp and 72.7-kbp circular chromosomes, respectively. This genome will be a valuable resource for phylogenetic and comparative studies and is an essential reference for future genetic engineering efforts toward the development of members of the genus Picochlorum for use as a biofuel and renewable chemical production platform.

Accession number(s).

This genome sequence is publicly available at The Greenhouse knowledgebase at Los Alamos National Laboratory (https://greenhouse.lanl.gov/greenhouse). The version described in this paper is the first version and is deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number PJAJ00000000. The isolated and circular complete mitochondrial and chloroplast genome sequences are deposited under GenBank accession numbers MG552670 and MG552671, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the U.S. DOE-EERE Bioenergy Technologies Office under contract DE-EE0003046 to the National Alliance for Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts. C.R.G.-E. is supported through the Annual Operating Plan project (grant NL0025841) of the U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office.

Footnotes

Citation Gonzalez-Esquer CR, Twary SN, Hovde BT, Starkenburg SR. 2018. Nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial genome sequences of the prospective microalgal biofuel strain Picochlorum soloecismus. Genome Announc 6:e01498-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01498-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Unkefer CJ, Sayre RT, Magnuson JK, Anderson DB, Baxter I, Blaby IK, Brown JK, Carleton M, Cattolico RA, Dale T, Devarenne TP, Downes CM, Dutcher SK, Fox DT, Goodenough U, Jaworski J, Holladay JE, Kramer DM, Koppisch AT, Lipton MS, Marrone BL, McCormick M, Molnár I, Mott JB, Ogden KL, Panisko EA, Pellegrini M, Polle J, Richardson JW, Sabarsky M, Starkenburg SR, Stormo GD, Teshima M, Twary SN, Unkefer PJ, Yuan JS, Olivares JA. 2017. Review of the algal biology program within the National Alliance for Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts. Algal Res 22:187–215. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dahmen I, Chtourou H, Jebali A, Daassi D, Karray F, Hassairi I, Sayadi S, Abdelkafi S, Dhouib A. 2014. Optimisation of the critical medium components for better growth of Picochlorum sp. and the role of stressful environments for higher lipid production. J Sci Food Agric 94:1628–1638. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de la Vega M, Díaz E, Vila M, León R. 2011. Isolation of a new strain of Picochlorum sp. and characterization of its potential biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Prog 27:1535–1543. doi: 10.1002/btpr.686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhu Y, Dunford NT, Goad C. 2014. Effect of processing parameters on flocculation of Picochlorum oklahomensis. J Am Oil Chem Soc 91:317–324. doi: 10.1007/s11746-013-2371-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu Y, Dunford NT. 2013. Growth and biomass characteristics of Picochlorum oklahomensis and Nannochloropsis oculata. J Am Oil Chem Soc 90:841–849. doi: 10.1007/s11746-013-2225-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang S, Lambert W, Giang S, Goericke R, Palenik B. 2014. Microalgal assemblages in a poikilohaline pond. J Phycol 50:303–309. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Foflonker F, Price DC, Qiu H, Palenik B, Wang S, Bhattacharya D. 2015. Genome of the halotolerant green alga Picochlorum sp. reveals strategies for thriving under fluctuating environmental conditions. Environ Microbiol 17:412–426. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Foflonker F, Ananyev G, Qiu H, Morrison A, Palenik B, Dismukes GC, Bhattacharya D. 2016. The unexpected extremophile: tolerance to fluctuating salinity in the green alga Picochlorum. Algal Res 16:465–472. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huesemann M, Dale T, Chavis A, Crowe B, Twary S, Barry A, Valentine D, Yoshida R, Wigmosta M, Cullinan V. 2017. Simulation of outdoor pond cultures using indoor LED-lighted and temperature-controlled raceway ponds and Phenometrics photobioreactors. Algal Res 21:178–190. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, Smith GP, Milton J, Brown CG, Hall KP, Evers DJ, Barnes CL, Bignell HR, Boutell JM, Bryant J, Carter RJ, Cheetham RK, Cox AJ, Ellis DJ, Flatbush MR, Gormley NA, Humphray SJ, Irving LJ, Karbelashvili MS, Kirk SM, Li H, Liu X, Maisinger KS, Murray LJ, Obradovic B, Ost T, Parkinson ML, Pratt MR, Rasolonjatovo IMJ, Reed MT, Rigatti R, Rodighiero C, Ross MT, Sabot A, Sankar SV, Scally A, Schroth GP, Smith ME, Smith VP, Spiridou A, Torrance PE, Tzonev SS, Vermaas EH, Walter K, Wu X, Zhang L, Alam MD, Anastasi C, et al. . 2008. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 456:53–59. doi: 10.1038/nature07517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y-J, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim J-B, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, et al. . 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380. doi: 10.1038/nature03959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Han CS, Chain P. 2006. Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher, p 141–146. In Arabnia HR, Valafar H (ed), Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Bioinformatics & Computational Biology. CSREA Press, Las Vegas, NV. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cantarel BL, Korf I, Robb SMC, Parra G, Ross E, Moore B, Holt C, Sánchez Alvarado A, Yandell M. 2008. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res 18:188–196. doi: 10.1101/gr.6743907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES