Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2018 Jan 25;6(4):e01543-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01543-17

Complete Genome Sequence of Bacillus velezensis CN026 Exhibiting Antagonistic Activity against Gram-Negative Foodborne Pathogens

Catherine Nannan a, Annika Gillis a, Simon Caulier a,b, Jacques Mahillon a,
PMCID: PMC5786689  PMID: 29371363

ABSTRACT

We report here the complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis strain CN026, a member of the B. subtilis group, which is known for its many industrial applications. The genome contains 3,995,812 bp and displays six gene clusters potentially involved in strain CN026’s activity against Gram-negative foodborne pathogens.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The Bacillus subtilis group originally comprised the species B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, B. pumilus, and B. amyloliquefaciens (1, 2). New species and subspecies were then validly described and added to this group (3, 4). In recent years, heterotypic synonyms between several species of the group have been highlighted, leading to taxonomic status reevaluations (4, 5). Hence, B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum (which includes the plant growth-promoting type strain FZB42 [6]), B. methylotrophicus (7), and B. oryzicola (8) have been suggested as later heterotypic synonyms of the species B. velezensis (9).

Strain CN026, isolated from chicken feces in Sorinnes, Belgium, was identified by gyrB and rpoB gene sequencing as belonging to the B. velezensis species (4, 10). Its culture supernatant displays a high ability to inhibit the growth of several important foodborne pathogens, i.e., Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria spp., and Bacillus spp., in laboratory conditions, as well as in food matrices. Here, we report the complete genome sequence of strain CN026.

Whole-genome sequencing of strain CN026 was performed at Macrogen, Inc. (South Korea) using the Illumina MiSeq platform with a 300-bp paired-end run and 550-bp insert library (TruSeq DNA PCR-Free). A total of 1,888,971 reads were generated and assembled in 28 contigs with the IDBA-UD de novo assembler (11). The contigs were ordered and oriented using CAR analysis (12) based on the reference genome of the closely related B. velezensis strain JS25R (GenBank accession number NZ_CP009679.1). The gaps between contigs were filled by custom primer walking, PCR amplification, and DNA sequencing. Gene annotation was performed with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) version 4.3 (13).

The B. velezensis strain CN026 genome contains a single circular chromosome of 3,995,812 bp with a G+C content of 46.4%. It comprises 3,875 coding sequences and 68 tRNAs. A genome-to-genome distance comparison with strain JS25R was calculated in silico (14). The DNA-DNA hybridization was estimated to be 93.60%, whereas the evaluated average nucleotide identity was 99.24% (15). No complete prophage region and no acquired antimicrobial resistance gene were identified with the PHAST (16) and ResFinder (17) search tools, respectively. Similarly, no gene families that correlate with human pathogenicity were detected in the CN026 genome (18).

AntiSMASH analyses were performed to identify gene clusters encoding the biosynthetic pathways of known classes of secondary metabolites (19). Six complete gene cluster sequences were detected: three polyketide synthases for macrolactin, bacillaene, and difficidin, as well as three nonribosomal peptide synthetases for fengycin, bacillibactin, and bacilysin. Overall, strain CN026 represents a good candidate for use in biopreservation.

Accession number(s).

The complete genome sequence of strain CN026 was deposited in GenBank under the accession no. CP024897.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to L. Hock and A. Leprince for their critical reading of the manuscript.

This work was supported by the Brussels Institute for Research and Innovation (Innoviris, Doctiris program to C.N.), the National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS, grant to A.G.), the Foundation for Training in Industrial and Agricultural Research (FRIA, grant to S.C.), and the Université Catholique de Louvain.

Footnotes

Citation Nannan C, Gillis A, Caulier S, Mahillon J. 2018. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis CN026 exhibiting antagonistic activity against Gram-negative foodborne pathogens. Genome Announc 6:e01543-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01543-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gordon RE, Haynes W, Pang CHN. 1973. The genus Bacillus. Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Priest FG, Goodfellow M, Shute LA, Berkeley RCW. 1987. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens sp. nov., nom. rev. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 37:69–71. doi: 10.1099/00207713-37-1-69. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fritze D. 2004. Taxonomy of the genus Bacillus and related genera: the aerobic endospore-forming bacteria. Phytopathology 94:1245–1248. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fan B, Blom J, Klenk HP, Borriss R. 2017. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Bacillus siamensis form an “operational group B. amyloliquefaciens” within the B. subtilis species complex. Front Microbiol 8:22. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dunlap CA, Kim SJ, Kwon SW, Rooney AP. 2016. Bacillus velezensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Bacillus methylotrophicus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and ‘Bacillus oryzicola’ are later heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus velezensis based on phylogenomics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:1212–1217. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Borriss R, Chen XH, Rueckert C, Blom J, Becker A, Baumgarth B, Fan B, Pukall R, Schumann P, Spröer C, Junge H, Vater J, Pühler A, Klenk HP. 2011. Relationship of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens clades associated with strains DSM 7T and FZB42T: a proposal for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens subsp. nov. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum subsp. nov. based on complete genome sequence comparisons. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:1786–1801. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.023267-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Kwon SW, Sa TM. 2010. Bacillus methylotrophicus sp. nov., a methanol-utilizing, plant-growth-promoting bacterium isolated from rice rhizosphere soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:2490–2495. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.015487-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chung EJ, Hossain MT, Khan A, Kim KH, Jeon CO, Chung YR. 2015. Bacillus oryzicola sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from the roots of rice with antimicrobial, plant growth promoting, and systemic resistance inducing activities in rice. Plant Pathol J 31:152–164. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.12.2014.0136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ruiz-García C, Béjar V, Martínez-Checa F, Llamas I, Quesada E. 2005. Bacillus velezensis sp. nov., a surfactant-producing bacterium isolated from the river Vélez in Málaga, southern Spain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:191–195. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63310-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang LT, Lee FL, Tai CJ, Kasai H. 2007. Comparison of gyrB gene sequences, 16S rRNA gene sequences and DNA–DNA hybridization in the Bacillus subtilis group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1846–1850. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64685-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Peng Y, Leung HC, Yiu SM, Chin FY. 2012. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28:1420–1428. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lu CL, Chen KT, Huang SY, Chiu HT. 2014. CAR: contig assembly of prokaryotic draft genomes using rearrangements. BMC Bioinformatics 15:381. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0381-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Angiuoli SV, Gussman A, Klimke W, Cochrane G, Field D, Garrity GM, Kodira CD, Kyrpides N, Madupu R, Markowitz V, Tatusova T, Thomson N, White O. 2008. Toward an online repository of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for (meta)genomic annotation. Omics 12:137–141. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.0017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. 2011. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W347–W352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cosentino S, Voldby Larsen M, Møller Aarestrup F, Lund O. 2013. Pathogenfinder—distinguishing friend from foe using bacterial whole genome sequence data. PLoS One 8:e77302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Weber T, Blin K, Duddela S, Krug D, Kim HU, Bruccoleri R, Lee SY, Fischbach MA, Müller R, Wohlleben W, Breitling R, Takano E, Medema MH. 2015. antiSMASH 3.0—a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W237–W243. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES