Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
letter
. 2018 Jan 25;62(2):e02275-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02275-17

Ritonavir-Boosted Protease Inhibitors but Not Cobicistat Appear Safe in HIV-Positive Patients Ingesting Dabigatran

Payal P Kakadiya a,#, Robert T Higginson b, Patricia Pecora Fulco a,b,✉,#
PMCID: PMC5786782  PMID: 29133562

LETTER

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have a near-normal life expectancy and as a result are experiencing common age-related medical conditions (e.g., atrial fibrillation) and polypharmacy (1, 2). Significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with concurrent antiretroviral therapy (ART) and direct oral anticoagulants are common and result in an increased risk for major bleeding (3, 4). As an example, concurrent use of apixaban or rivaroxaban with ritonavir or cobicistat (COBI) is not recommended due to cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition, resulting in supratherapeutic concentrations and increased hemorrhagic risk (46). Dabigatran is not CYP metabolized, is primarily renally eliminated, and is a substrate of intestinal permeability glycoprotein (p-gp) and renal multidrug and toxin extrusion-1 (MATE-1) transporter (68). Both ritonavir and COBI inhibit p-gp and MATE-1 (68). In a recent study of 34 healthy volunteers, dabigatran was administered concurrently or separated by 2 h from either ritonavir or COBI (911). Increased dabigatran and thrombin time concentrations resulted with concurrent COBI but not with ritonavir (911). We report a case of concurrent dabigatran and ritonavir-boosted darunavir in a patient with multidrug resistant (MDR) HIV and summarize previously reported data.

A 74-year-old African-American male (weight, 63 kg; glomerular filtration rate, 75 ml/min) with MDR HIV (viral load undetectable) who had undergone triple cardiac bypass surgery with a pacemaker was anticoagulated with warfarin for approximately 8 years. Dabigatran at 150 mg twice daily was substituted for warfarin by his cardiologist. At his infectious diseases appointment, an expected DDI between COBI and dabigatran led to ART substitution, including darunavir-COBI discontinuation, darunavir-ritonavir initiation, and continuation of rilpivirine, emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide, and raltegravir (9). Dabigatran peak (2 h after ingestion) and trough concentrations were monitored and remained therapeutic, 285 ng/ml and 59 ng/ml, respectively (1214). An activated partial thromboplastin time of 60 s resulted, with no bleeding events. The patient remained on concurrent therapy for 11 months.

In the recent study evaluating dabigatran with ART, p-gp inhibition appears to be the mechanism of the DDI, as renal elimination was not affected (9, 11). In patients receiving p-gp inhibitors and dabigatran, more-frequent monitoring of bleeding is recommended (15). Dabigatran peak (64 to 443 ng/ml) and trough (recommended, <73 ng/ml) concentrations in atrial fibrillation patients are correlated with decreased hemorrhagic and thromboembolic risks (1214). In our patient, dabigatran concentrations were therapeutic, with no documented adverse/thromboembolic events.

In two previous case reports using dabigatran with concurrent atazanavir-ritonavir or lopinavir-ritonavir, dabigatran concentrations remained within the therapeutic range (Table 1) (16, 17). Twenty additional patients concurrently using dabigatran and ART were recently reported, but no therapeutic drug-monitoring concentrations or the antiretrovirals utilized were provided (4). Based on the published cases and the healthy-volunteer data, dabigatran dose reduction (75 mg) or separation does not appear necessary (if the patient is not obese and has normal renal function) in HIV-positive patients prescribed concurrent ritonavir. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered a helpful monitoring tool (4). The recently published data in this journal demonstrate the necessity for careful evaluation of HIV-positive patients receiving concurrent p-gp substrates with either ritonavir or COBI. COBI and ritonavir have similar pharmacokinetic antiretroviral enhancer activities but differences in CYP inhibition/induction, and transport proteins exist (611).

TABLE 1.

Dabigatran serum concentrations with concurrent ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimens

Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor therapy (reference) Dabigatran peak concn in serum (64–443 ng/ml) Dabigatran trough concn in serum (<73 ng/ml) aPTT (s)a
Darunavir 285 59 60
Atazanavir (16) 229 <32 69
Lopinavir (17)b 113 52 40
a

aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time.

b

The dabigatran dose was 110 mg twice daily.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

R.T.H. provided the patient case and reviewed the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration. 2017. Survival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996–2013: a collaborative analysis of cohort studies. Lancet HIV 4:e349–e356. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30066-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McNicholl IR, Gandhi M, Bradley HC, Greene M, Pierluissi E. 10 October 2017. A pharmacist-led program to evaluate and reduce polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older, HIV-positive patients. Pharmacotherapy doi: 10.1002/phar.2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang SH, Chou IJ, Yeh YH, Chiou MJ, Wen MS, Kuo CT, See LC, Kuo CF. 2017. Association between use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants with and without concurrent medications and risk of major bleeding in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA 318:1250–1259. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.West TA, Perram J, Holloway CJ. 2017. Use of direct oral anticoagulants for treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with HIV: a review. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 12:554–560. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. 17 October 2017. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC: Accessed 30 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Egan G, Hughes CA, Ackman ML. 2014. Drug interactions between antiplatelet or novel oral anticoagulant medications and antiretroviral medications. Ann Pharmacother 2014:734–740. doi: 10.1177/1060028014523115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marzolini C, Gibbons S, Khoo S, Back D. 2016. Cobicistat versus ritonavir boosting and differences in the drug-drug interaction profiles with co-medications. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:1755–1758. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tseng A, Hughes CA, Wu J, Seet J, Phillips EJ. 2017. Cobicistat versus ritonavir: similar pharmacokinetic enhancers but some important differences. Ann Pharmacother 51:1008–1022. doi: 10.1177/1060028017717018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gordon LA, Kumar P, Brooks KM, Kellogg A, McManus M, Alfaro RM, Nghiem K, George JM, Lozier J, Penzak SR, Hadigan C. 2016. Antiretroviral boosting agent cobicistat increases the pharmacokinetic exposure and anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in HIV-negative healthy volunteers. Circulation 134:1909–1911. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brooks KM, Gordon L, Penzak S, Kellogg A, McManus M, Nghiem K, Lozier J, George JM, Hadigan C, Kumar P. 2017. Cobicistat, but not ritonavir, increases dabigatran exposure, poster 409. Conf Retroviruses Opportun Infect, Seattle, WA, 13 to 16 February 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kumar P, Gordon LA, Brooks KM, George JM, Kellogg A, McManus M, Alfaro RM, Nghiem K, Lozier J, Hadigan C, Penzak SR. 2017. Differential influence of antiretroviral PK enhancers, ritonavir and cobicistat, on intestinal p-glycoprotein transport and the PK/PD disposition of dabigatran. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01201-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01201-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ezekowitz MD, Reilly PA, Nehmiz G, Simmers TA, Nagarakanti R, Parcham-Azad K, Pedersen KE, Lionetti DA, Stangier J, Wallentin L. 2007. Dabigatran with or without concomitant aspirin compared with warfarin alone in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (PETRO Study). Am J Cardiol 100:1419–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reilly PA, Lehr T, Haertter S, Connolly SJ, Yusuf S, Eikelboom JW, Ezekowitz MD, Nehmiz G, Wang S, Wallentin L, RE-LY Investigators . 2014. The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients (RE-LY Trial). J Am Coll Cardiol 63:321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Heidbuchel H, Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Diener HC, Hacke W, Oldgren J, Sinnaeve P, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P. 2015. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 17:1467–1507. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Conway SE, Hwang AY, Ponte CD, Gums JG. 2017. Laboratory and clinical monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants: what clinicians need to know. Pharmacotherapy 37:236–248. doi: 10.1002/phar.1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Perram J, Joseph J, Holloway C. 2015. Novel oral anticoagulants and HIV: dabigatran use with antiretrovirals. BMJ Case Rep 2015:bcr2015211651. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-211651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barco S, Coppens M, van den Dool EJ, van de Kerkhof D, Stroobants AK, Middeldorp S. 2014. Successful co-administration of dabigatran etexilate and protease inhibitors ritonavir/lopinavir in a patient with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 112:836–838. doi: 10.1160/TH14-03-0214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES