Prepubertal Ovariectomy Exaggerates Adult Affective Behaviors and Alters the Hippocampal Transcriptome in a Genetic Rat Model of Depression

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating illness that affects twice as many women than men postpuberty. This female bias is thought to be caused by greater heritability of MDD in women and increased vulnerability induced by female sex hormones. We tested this hypothesis by removing the ovaries from prepubertal Wistar Kyoto (WKY) more immobile (WMI) females, a genetic animal model of depression, and its genetically close control, the WKY less immobile (WLI). In adulthood, prepubertally ovariectomized (PrePubOVX) animals and their Sham-operated controls were tested for depression- and anxiety-like behaviors, using the routinely employed forced swim and open field tests, respectively, and RNA-sequencing was performed on their hippocampal RNA. Our results confirmed that the behavioral and hippocampal expression changes that occur after prepubertal ovariectomy are the consequences of an interaction between genetic predisposition to depressive behavior and ovarian hormone-regulated processes. Lack of ovarian hormones during and after puberty in the WLIs led to increased depression-like behavior. In WMIs, both depression- and anxiety-like behaviors worsened by prepubertal ovariectomy. The unbiased exploration of the hippocampal transcriptome identified sets of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the strains and treatment groups. The relatively small number of hippocampal DEGs resulting from the genetic differences between the strains confirmed the genetic relatedness of these strains. Nevertheless, the differences in DEGs between the strains in response to prepubertal ovariectomy identified different molecular processes, including the importance of glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mechanisms, that may be causative of the increased depression-like behavior in the presence or absence of genetic predisposition. This study contributes to the understanding of hormonal maturation-induced changes in affective behaviors and the hippocampal transcriptome as it relates to genetic predisposition to depression.

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a devastating and prevalent disorder. Pubertal development is a major factor in the first onset of MDD, particularly in females. While ~7% of 13–14 year olds are affected, this percentage doubles in 17–18 year olds (1). During preadolescence, the prevalence of MDD shows no gender difference, but after puberty and until menopause, the incidence of depression is twice as high in women as in men (1). Anxiety, which is frequently comorbid with MDD, is also more common in female MDD (2).

In addition to the many social, physiological, and psychological changes that occur during female puberty that partially explain the increased incidence of MDD in adolescence, increased and cyclic secretion of estradiol (E2) and progesterone are proposed to contribute to the risk. One mechanism by which this may occur is through E2’s ability to regulate the stress-responsive hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (3, 4), which is known to be closely involved in the etiology of MDD. During periods of life when large changes in levels of E2 occur, vulnerability for the incidence of depression and anxiety also increases (5, 6). Studies have demonstrated that heightened anxiety tends to occur at times when E2 is lower, such as premenstrually and postpartum, while women report decreased anxiety during periods of higher E2 levels (7), suggesting an anxiolytic role of E2. Animal studies mirror these E2-associated antianxiety effects (8, 9), manifested in decreased anxiety-like behavior from adolescence to adulthood (10–12), and increased anxiety-like behavior after prepubertal ovariectomy (PrePubOVX) (13). In adulthood, both low levels of estrogen and progesterone and the complete lack of these hormones after postpubertal ovariectomy have been associated with greater occurrence of depression-like behavior (14–16). Thus, a paradox clearly exists between the increased incidence of MDD and anxiety after puberty in women, and the anxiolytic and antidepressant roles of E2.

The study of the interaction of genetics and hormones in MDD has proved even more elusive as genetic risks contributing to MDD have just begun to be identified (17). As shown by both human and animal studies, partially overlapping, but mostly distinct, genetic and/or epigenetic mechanisms precipitate MDD in males and females (18, 19). In particular, women tend to have a higher heritability for the disorder than men (20), and the genetic architecture of depression-like behavior is sexually dimorphic (19). Previously, we have shown that while male Wistar Kyoto (WKY) more immobile (WMI) inbred rats display depression-like behavior before and after puberty, females exhibit increased depression-like behavior only after puberty (21), paralleling the higher prevalence of MDD in postpubertal women compared with men.

The WMIs are derived from the near-inbred WKY rat strain, an established model of major depression with comorbid anxiety in adulthood (19, 22–26) and adolescence (27, 28). Two inbred strains were generated from the WKYs by selective breeding using the immobility behavior in the forced swim test (FST) as a functional selector. These are the WMI showing despair-like behavior and its genetically similar, but behaviorally different control strain, the WKY less immobile (WLI). Both depression- and anxiety-like behaviors increase between early adolescence and adulthood in the female WMIs (21). These strains provide a unique opportunity to begin exploring the role of puberty in the development of depression- and anxiety-like behaviors in females with or without stable genetic predisposition.

Further, gene expression differences in the hippocampus between the WMIs and WLIs have been previously reported (21, 29, 30). The hippocampus is known to show abnormalities in mood disorders (31, 32) and undergo significant remodeling during the pubertal period (33). In both humans (34, 35) with depression and rodent models of depression (36, 37), alterations in both volumetric and functional connectivity have been reported. A previous microarray study of the WLI and WMI males found significant, large (higher than 3×) expression differences between the strains in the hippocampus (29). Of the most significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs), strain differences have also been found between early adolescent (EA) and adult WMI and WLI females (21). For these reasons, although multiple other regions are involved in the pathophysiology of depression, we chose to focus on the hippocampus for this study.

This study investigated the consequences of ovariectomy before puberty on the adult WMI’s and WLI’s behavior in the FST and in the open field tests (OFTs), a routinely used test of anxiety-like behavior. Transcriptome differences by strain and treatment were examined by RNA-Seq in the hippocampus. In addition to global transcriptome changes in the hippocampus, we focused on changes in transcript levels of the estrogen receptors, which are present in high density in the hippocampus (7) and glucocorticoid receptors, known to be involved in mood and depression-like behaviors (38). We hypothesized that prepubertal ovariectomy affects both the behavior and gene expression of WMIs and WLIs differently.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Northwestern University approved all animal procedures. The WMI and WLI strains have been maintained in our vivarium with continuous brother–sister mating throughout the past 35 generations (21, 39). Animals were housed under temperature and humidity control, a 14:10 h light–dark cycle, with lights on at 0600 hours. Food and water were available ad libitum.

Prepubertal WMI and WLI female rats, 26–28 days old, were anesthetized using a ketamine–xylazine cocktail (4 mL/kg containing 10 mg ketamine and 1.25 mg xylazine in 0.9 mL H₂O) and either underwent bilateral ovariectomy (PrePubOVX, N = 12 WMI, 17 WLI) or Sham operation (Sham, N = 11 WMI, 15 WLI). Differences in animal numbers between the strains are due to the lower fecundity of WMIs compared with the WLIs. The timing of ovariectomy was chosen as to preclude pubertal changes, which can start at postnatal day (PN) 28, but generally begin from PN 33 onward (40). Figure S1 in Supplementary Material shows the detailed experimental design. Intact WMI and WLI females were also employed in the FST to determine if Sham surgery before puberty cause any change in this behavior, which was the original selector of these strains. We expected that the differences between Sham and PrePubOVX measures would be a magnitude higher than estrus cycle-related differences, and therefore we did not control for estrus cycle phases of the Sham or intact females.

To compare the effect of the lack of ovarian hormones between early adolescence (before puberty) and the adult state after PrePubOVX on the hippocampal expression of the estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors, we included EA animals in those specific studies.

Behavioral Testing

Behavioral testing began at approximately postnatal day 90 with the OFT as described previously (21). Briefly, animals were placed in the center of an 82-cm diameter arena, with an internal, central illumination of 77 lux. The test lasted 10 min, and the number of times the animal entered into the center 50-cm diameter area and the % time spent there were measured by TSE Videomot 2 version 5.75 software (Technical & Scientific Equipment, Bad Homburg, Germany). Anxious animals exhibit increased thigmotaxis and spend less time in the center of the open arena.

Two days later, FST was performed (prior OFT does not affect FST behavior) as described previously (19). Briefly, on the first day of the 2-day test, adult animals were placed in a tank filled with 22–24°C water for 15 min. On day 2, animals were again placed in the tank for a 5-min session, which was videotaped and later scored by a trained observer, blind to the strain or the treatment of the animal. Intact same age animals from a different generation were also tested in the FST to determine the effect of Sham surgery on this behavior. It is thought that increased time spent immobile in the FST indicates increased despair-like behavior.

RNA Isolation

Five weeks after behavioral testing, PrePubOVX and Sham animals were killed by fast decapitation. The right hippocampi were dissected using Paxinos coordinates as described previously (21). Unpublished data from a previous microarray study in our lab indicate no significant hemisphere-specific differences in the DEGs between the two strains. Further, we found no hemisphere-specific differences of these genes in the Allen Brain Atlas. Total RNA from individual right hippocampi was extracted with the RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, including treatment with DNase.

Construction of RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) Libraries

RNA-sequencing was performed from hippocampal RNA (N = 4/strain/treatment group). RNA quality was evaluated with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Libraries were created from high quality RNA (RNA integrity number of 7 or greater) using the SENSE mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit from Lexogen (Lexogen, Vienna, Austria) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. This protocol includes an integrated poly(A) mRNA selection process, and the constructed library maintains the strand specificity. One single RNA-Seq library was constructed for each RNA sample. Library production is initiated by the random hybridization of Starter/Stopper heterodimers to the RNA template, followed by first and second strand cDNA synthesis. The cDNA was subject to end repair, adenylation of 3′ ends and adapter ligation. The adapters contained a unique “barcode” for each sample, which allows for multiplexing. The cDNA library quality and size distribution were checked using an Agilent Bioanalyzer and DNA 1000 chip. Library fragment sizes were between 200 and 500 bp, with a peak at B260 bp. All libraries were quantified with a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and stored at −20°C.

Sequencing and Analysis

RNA-sequencing libraries were sequenced using Life Technologies 5500XL Wildfire Genetic Analyzer. Samples were equally distributed between and multiplexed in three lanes and sequenced with 50 bp single end reads. Raw sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive¹ (SRA accession number SAMN07569379). The sequencing reads were first converted from the xsq format to csfasta format. Read quality was stored in qual files. The SHRiMP (v2.2.3) software was used to align the sequences to the rat reference genome (rn5) using the default parameters. Sequence reads spanning the exonal junctions were recovered (based on the CIGAR code) using TopHat (v1.4.1) (41) and the RefSeq database as a reference. The genomic and exonal junction reads were then combined into a single sorted bam file for each sample, with reads from the different sequencing lanes remaining separated. HTSeq was then used to count the number of reads, mapped to each gene using the RefSeq database as the reference. DESeq2, of the Bioconductor suite, was used for differential expression analysis. Read counts were normalized according to the DESeq2 procedure and DEGs were identified between groups while controlling for any variations associated with the sequencing lane. In any comparison, at least one group had to have an average of transcript reads >10, to reduce false positives due to very low read counts. Highly significant DEGs are defined as those with a q value <0.05 and fold change (FC) below 0.7 or above 1.3.

The average total reads mapped per sample group were WLI PrePubOVX: 48,285,977 ± 3,179,918, WLI Sham: 47,622,998 ± 5,372,814, WMI PrePubOVX: 54,551,134 ± 5,305,802, and WMI Sham: 51,868,942 ± 1,858,496. The percent unique reads per sample group were as follows: WLI PrePubOVX: 50.84 ± 0.86%, WLI Sham: 49.99 ± 0.71%, WMI PrePubOVX: 49.01 ± 0.74%, and WMI Sham: 49.45 ± 0.745%.

Gene Ontology and Pathway Analysis

Pathway and global functional analyses were performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis 6.0² (IPA). A data set containing gene identifiers and corresponding expression values was uploaded into the application, and each gene identifier was mapped to its corresponding gene object in the ingenuity pathways knowledge base. The functional and canonical pathway analysis identified interacting networks associated with DEGs between groups. The significance of the association between the data set and the network was measured by the p-value of the Fisher’s exact test. Because of the sample size per group and the multiple comparisons needed for testing the hypotheses, the cutoff p-value was set at p < 0.01 to balance type 1 and type 2 errors in the initial analyses for the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. We focused on the most significant network from each comparison.

Real-time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)

RT-qPCR was used to corroborate the RNA-Seq findings using randomly selected transcripts. RNA samples from the right hippocampus of EA (PN 32–34) WMIs and WLIs, obtained in our previous study (21), were also used in some of the qPCR analyses to compare hippocampal levels among EA, adult PrePubOVX and Sham females. cDNA was synthesized and RT-qPCR was performed on six to eight samples per strain/group as described previously (29). Briefly, the ABI 7900HT real-time cycler was used to amplify 5 ng cDNA using SYBR green reaction mix (ABI, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Primers were designed to amplify 80–150 bp products using the default settings of ABI’s Primer Express software (version 3.0, PE Applied Biosystems). Primer pairs are listed in Table S1 in Supplementary Material. Reactions were performed in triplicate and reached threshold amplification within 35 PCR cycles. Transcript levels were determined relative to GAPDH using the 2^−(ΔΔCt) method.

Statistical Analysis

Data points were removed only for technical reasons, such as when the TSE program could not track the animals’ movement in the OFT, or when the quantitative RT-qPCR results were uninterpretable. All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism v 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Two-way ANOVA determined significant differences between the strains (WMI vs. WLI) and conditions (Sham vs. PrePubOVX) for all behavioral measures and for most RT-qPCR analyses. Data were tested for normality and homogeneity using the D’Agostino and Pearson normality test and the homogeneity of variance test. Based on the recommendation of GraphPad, data were transformed when these tests showed highly significant deviation from Gaussian distribution. Bonferroni-corrected significance or hypothesis testing by Student’s t-test was reported in the figures. Significance was considered at p < 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

A trend of significance was identified at p < 0.1. In addition, we also detected p < 0.05 significance at post hoc comparisons, even when the ANOVA was not significant. Our decision to describe these results were based on an increasing number of discussions arguing that p-values are not as reliable as it is thought previously (42) and that while a three-group comparison ANOVA may not result in significance, two groups of the three can differ from each other at the p < 0.05 level (43).

Pearson correlation of FCs between the RNA-Seq and the qRT-PCR results was calculated for specific transcripts as described.

Results

Body Weight and Affective Behaviors

In general, adult WLI females were heavier than WMIs [Strain: F(1,50) = 16.57, p < 0.01, Figure 1A]. Body weights of the PrePubOVX adults were significantly greater compared with Sham females and WLI PrePubOVX females were heavier than the WMI PrePubOVX adults [strain: F(1,50) = 16.6, p < 0.01; condition: F(1,50) = 133.5, p < 0.01]. Specifically, both WMI and WLI Sham females weigh less (p < 0.01) than their PrePubOVX counterparts.

Figure 1.

Removal of ovarian hormones before puberty alters body weight, depression- and anxiety-like behaviors. (A) Body weights as measured in grams in Sham and prepubertally ovariectomized adult female Wistar Kyoto (WKY) less immobile (WLIs) and WKY more immobiles (WMIs). (B) Immobility behavior in the forced swim test measured every 5 s (5 s bins). Immobility of intact animals did not differ from those of shams’ and therefore, data were combined. (C) Natural logarithm of the number of visits to the inner area of the open field arena and (D) percent time spent in the inner area of the open field arena. Lines marked by **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 reflect Bonferroni-corrected post hoc analyses. ^{^}p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test, as hypothesis testing between two groups, when ANOVA is significant or a trend (p < 0.1). Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Depression-like behavior was assessed by time spent being immobile on the second day of the FST test (Figure 1B). Sham surgery had no effect on the FST immobility of adult randomly cycling females of either strain, therefore, Sham and intact data for FST were combined. As expected, Sham and intact WMIs showed greater immobility than WLIs (21, 29). In general, ovariectomy before puberty increased the immobility of adult animals [condition: F(1,86) = 79.93, p < 0.01]. Floating was significantly greater in the PrePubOVX animals of both the WMI and WLI strain (p < 0.01). However, the degree of this increase differed by strain [strain × condition: F(1,86) = 15.04, p < 0.01]. Specifically, PrePubOVX resulted in a significantly greater change from controls in WLI’s immobility compared with WMIs [23.63 ± 2.64 vs. 9.33 ± 2.98; t(27) = 3.55, p < 0.01].

Increased anxiety-like behavior was observed in the WMI PrePubOVX adults compared with WMI Shams in the open field test. As the inner visit measure showed deviation from Gaussian distribution, the ln transformation of the data was analyzed and shown on Figure 1C. WMI PrePubOVX females exhibited decreased number of inner visits [Figure 1C; condition: F(1,50) = 5.12, p < 0.05]. Anxiety-like behavior, as measured by % time spent in the center of the open field, tended to increase in the PrePubOVX adults compared with Shams [Figure 1D; condition: F(1,42) = 2.88, p = 0.09], this was driven by increased anxiety-like behavior of the PrePubOVX WMIs compared with WMI Shams, only [t(17) = 2.28, p < 0.05].

Differential Gene Expression

To study transcriptional regulation in the PrePubOVX hippocampus of both strains and identify DEGs that may underlie enhanced despair- and/or anxiety-like behaviors, we next performed RNA-Seq analysis. Genes appearing in Tables 1–4 include a list of significant genes where one comparison resulted in a q value (false discovery rate) <0.05.

Table 1.

Wistar Kyoto (WKY) less immobile (WLI) Sham vs. WKY more immobile (WMI) sham, differentially expressed genes at FDR < 0.05; Fold change (FC) > 1.3 or fold change < 0.7.

Gene symbol	Description	FC
Frk3,b,c*	Fyn-related Src family tyrosine kinase	0.317
Cdhr5	Cadherin-related family member 5	0.366
Dpp63,b,c*	Dipeptidylpeptidase 6	0.371
Dph5	Diphthamide biosynthesis 5	0.486
Cnppd1	Cyclin Pas1/PHO80 domain containing 1	0.488
Usp6nl3,b,c*	USP6 N-terminal like	0.515
Nphp3	Nephronophthisis 3 (adolescent)	0.515
RT1-A3	RT1 class I, locus A3	0.519
Mppe1	Metallophosphoesterase 1	0.563
Tspan73,b,c*	Tetraspanin 7 pseudogene	0.569
Il9r2,a,d	Interleukin 9 receptor	0.605
Dpy19l33,b,c*	Dpy-19-like 3 (C. elegans)	0.620
Pcnx	Pecanex homolog (Drosophila)	0.630
Slc22a72,a,d	Solute carrier family 22 (organic anion transporter), member 7	0.651
Nme72,a,d	NME/NM23 family member 7	0.669
Traf63,b,c*	TNF receptor-associated factor 6, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase	1.343
Tcte1	T-complex-associated testis expressed 1	1.349
Ist1	Increased sodium tolerance 1 homolog (yeast)	1.426
Slc22a24	Solute carrier family 22, member 24	1.491
Cacna1e	Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, R type, alpha 1E subunit	1.509
Rsbn1l	Round spermatid basic protein 1-like	1.520
Zc3h6	Zinc finger CCCH type containing 6	1.535
Cd96	CD96 molecule	1.538
RGD13046943,b,c*	Similar to CG9646-PA	1.613
Tnfrsf4	Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 4	1.633
Sec63	SEC63 homolog (S. cerevisiae)	1.642
Papola	Poly (A) polymerase alpha	1.719
Qrich12,b,d	Glutamine-rich 1	1.761
Slc35c22,b,d	Solute carrier family 35 (GDP-fucose transporter), member C2	1.802
Map3k2	Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 2	1.806
Celsr32,b,d	Cadherin, EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 3	1.820
Actbl2	Actin, beta-like 2	1.944
Casc52,b,d	Cancer susceptibility candidate 5	2.034
Clec9a2,b,d	C-type lectin domain family 9, member A	2.041
Cabin12,b,d	Calcineurin binding protein 1	2.060

²Overlap with WLI PrePubOVX vs. WLI Sham.

³Overlap with WMI PrePubOVX vs. WMI Sham.

^aChange in expression parallels change in forced swim test (FST) behavior.

^bChange in expression does not parallel change in FST behavior.

^cChange in expression parallels change in open field test (OFT) behavior; *Parallel or inverse.

^dChange in expression does not parallel change in OFT behavior.

Table 4.

Wistar Kyoto (WKY) less immobile (WLI) PrePubOVX vs. WKY more immobile (WMI) PrePubOVX differentially expressed genes at FDR < 0.05; Fold change (FC) > 1.3 or fold change < 0.7.

Gene symbol	Description	FC
Zdhhc18	Zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 18	0.219
Nrk	Nik-related kinase	0.499
Anks1b2	Ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1B	0.517
Fanca	Fanconi anemia, complementation group A	0.598
Pigh2	Phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class H	0.601
Marcks3	Myristoylated alanine rich protein kinase C substrate	2.148
Rtkn2	Rhotekin 2	2.175
Prkci	Protein kinase C, iota	2.192
Cep1043	Centrosomal protein 104	2.263
Nacc1	Nucleus accumbens associated 1, BEN and BTB (POZ) domain containing	2.315
Slc9a3r23	Solute carrier family 9, subfamily A (NHE3, cation proton antiporter 3), member 3 regulator 2	2.804

²Overlap with WLI PrePubOVX vs. WLI Sham.

³Overlap with WMI PrePubOVX vs. WMI Sham.

Of the 17,905 transcripts that were aligned to RefSeq IDs, 35 transcripts were significantly different between WLI Sham vs. WMI Sham (Table 1), with an fold change (FC) > 1.3 or fold change < 0.7. Seventy-three DEGs were significant between WLI PrePubOVX and WLI Sham (Table 2), of which 61 were unique to this comparison. Of the 21 DEGs that were significant in the WMI PrePubOVX vs. WMI Sham comparison (Table 3), 11 were unique to this comparison. Finally, the expression of only five transcripts differed between WLI PrePubOVX vs. WMI PrePubOVX, with no overlap with the other comparisons (Table 4). Figure S2 in Supplementary Material displays the FC and p-value relationship of transcripts in the WLI PrePubOVX and WMI PrePubOVX comparison.

Table 2.

Wistar Kyoto (WKY) less immobile (WLI) PrePubOVX vs. WLI Sham, differentially expressed genes at FDR < 0.05; Fold change (FC) > 1.3 or fold change < 0.7.

Gene symbol	Description	FC
Clec9a1,b,d	C-type lectin domain family 9, member A	0.490
Slc35c21,b,d	Solute carrier family 35 (GDP-fucose transporter), member C2	0.502
Casc51,b,d	Cancer susceptibility candidate 5	0.531
Cabin11,b,d	Calcineurin binding protein 1	0.535
Celsr31,b,d	Cadherin, EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 3	0.577
Qrich11,b,d	Glutamine-rich 1	0.585
Golga4	Golgin A4	0.598
Dnajc10	DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 10	0.601
Sdc3	Syndecan 3	0.617
Pprc1	Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator-related 1	0.663
Ccdc175	Coiled-coil domain containing 175	0.677
Foxh1	Forkhead box H1	1.300
Rnf215	Ring finger protein 215	1.303
Stub1	STIP1 homology and U-box containing protein 1, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase	1.308
Kif20a	Kinesin family member 20A	1.325
mrpl24	Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L24	1.331
Ctsa	Cathepsin A	1.341
Anp32a	Acidic (leucine-rich) nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family, member A	1.341
Bace1	Beta-site APP cleaving enzyme 1	1.365
Dalrd3	DALR anticodon binding domain containing 3	1.367
Mars	Methionyl-tRNA synthetase	1.369
Dnajc14	DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 14	1.369
Tp73	Tumor protein p73	1.380
Rai1	Retinoic acid induced 1	1.388
Ppip5k1	Diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate kinase 1	1.389
Aip	Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein	1.390
Tmem88	Transmembrane protein 88	1.427
Angptl6	Angiopoietin-like 6	1.428
Capn12	Calpain 12	1.433
Thra	Thyroid hormone receptor alpha	1.437
Cers4	Ceramide synthase 4	1.445
Frem3	FRAS1-related extracellular matrix 3	1.447
B4galnt1	Beta-1,4-N-acetyl-galactosaminyl transferase 1	1.447
Ccdc24	Coiled-coil domain containing 24	1.460
H2afy2	H2A histone family, member Y2	1.465
Hsp90aa1	Heat shock protein 90, alpha (cytosolic), class A member 1	1.472
Klc3	Kinesin light chain 3	1.477
Tenm4	Teneurin transmembrane protein 4	1.478
Ptger1	Prostaglandin E receptor 1 (subtype EP1)	1.486
Tmed1	Transmembrane emp24 protein transport domain containing 1	1.487
Il9r1,a,d	Interleukin 9 receptor	1.500
Creb3	cAMP responsive element binding protein 3	1.506
Pdzd7	PDZ domain containing 7	1.509
Gatc	Glutamyl-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase, subunit C	1.512
Glg1	Golgi glycoprotein 1	1.517
Cd3eap	CD3e molecule, epsilon associated protein	1.522
Dda1	DET1 and DDB1 associated 1	1.522
Esrra	Estrogen-related receptor, alpha	1.524
Zfhx2	Zinc finger homeobox 2	1.526
Gabra2	Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor, alpha 2	1.551
Tmem88	Transmembrane protein 88	1.571
Smarcd3	SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily d, member 3	1.579
Ypel4	Yippee-like 4 (Drosophila)	1.581
Ttyh3	Tweety family member 3	1.587
Gpat2	Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 2, mitochondrial	1.614
Inpp5a	Inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase A	1.623
Samhd1	SAM domain and HD domain, 1	1.624
Nr3c1	Nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 1	1.627
Nme71,a,d	NME/NM23 family member 7	1.630
Pmel	Premelanosome protein	1.662
Camlg	Calcium modulating ligand	1.681
Doc2g	Double C2-like domains, gamma	1.687
Morf4l1	Mortality factor 4 like 1	1.748
Cyp21a1	Cytochrome P450, family 21, subfamily a, polypeptide 1	1.774
RT1-T24-2	RT1 class I, locus T24, gene 2	1.786
Pth1r	Parathyroid hormone 1 receptor	1.831
Topors	Topoisomerase I binding, arginine/serine-rich, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase	1.910
Slc22a71,a,d	Solute carrier family 22 (organic anion transporter), member 7	1.940
Pigh4	Phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class H	1.947
Myh7	Myosin, heavy chain 7, cardiac muscle, beta	2.150
Myh6	Myosin, heavy chain 6, cardiac muscle, alpha	2.169
Anks1b4	Ankyrin repeat and sterile alpha motif domain containing 1B	2.207
Nrk4	Nik-related kinase	2.398

¹Overlap with WLI Sham vs. WKY more immobile (WMI) Sham.

⁴Overlap with WLI PrePubOVX vs. WMI PrePubOVX.

^aChange in expression parallels change in forced swim test (FST) behavior.

^bChange in expression does not parallel change in FST behavior.

^dChange in expression does not parallel change in OFT behavior.

Table 3.

Wistar Kyoto (WKY) more immobile (WMI) PrePubOVX vs. WMI Sham, differentially expressed genes at FDR < 0.05; Fold change (FC) > 1.3 or fold change < 0.7.

Gene symbol	Description	FC
Jmjd6	Jumonji domain containing 6	0.285
Frk1,b,c*	Fyn-related Src family tyrosine kinase	0.379
Dpp61,b,c*	Dipeptidylpeptidase 6	0.394
Usp6nl1,b,c*	USP6 N-terminal like	0.507
Tspan71,b,c*	Tetraspanin 7 pseudogene	0.571
Mettl5	Methyltransferase like 5	0.615
Dpy19l31,b,c*	Dpy-19-like 3 (C. elegans)	0.620
Ccdc42	Coiled-coil domain containing 42	0.645
Uba2	Ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 2	0.653
Proca1	Protein interacting with cyclin A1	0.685
Nemf	Nuclear export mediator factor	0.695
Traf61,b,c*	TNF receptor-associated factor 6, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase	1.376
Phrf1	PHD and ring finger domains 1	1.501
Fam131b	Family with sequence similarity 131, member B	1.521
Tmem200c	Transmembrane protein 200C	1.524
Ano6	Anoctamin 6	1.690
RGD13046941,b,c*	Similar to CG9646-PA	1.691
Zfp36l2	Zinc finger protein 36, C3H type-like 2	1.704
Marcks4	Myristoylated alanine rich protein kinase C substrate	2.339
Cep1044	Centrosomal protein 104	2.432
Slc9a3r24	Solute carrier family 9, subfamily A (NHE3, cation proton antiporter 3), member 3 regulator 2	2.834

¹Overlap with WKY less immobile (WLI) Sham vs. WMI Sham.

⁴Overlap with WLI PrePubOVX vs. WMI PrePubOVX.

^bChange in expression does not parallel change in FST behavior.

^cChange in expression parallels change in open field test (OFT) behavior; ^*Parallel or inverse.

Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of selected DEGs were carried out. The selection was based on the expression pattern that paralleled, linearly or inversely, either the FST or the OFT behavioral changes. Specifically, transcript levels were measured from hippocampal RNA for those genes that showed higher (or lower) levels in the WMI Sham compared with WLI Sham hippocampus simultaneously with higher (or lower) levels in the WLI PrePubOVX compared with WLI Sham; an FST profile (Tables 1 and 2). These are Il9r, Nme7, and Slc22a7 (Figure S3A in Supplementary Material). Of these, expression of Nme7 confirmed all the criteria by qPCR, as well as the increased expression of Slc22a7 by PrePubOVX in the WLI strain. There were no transcripts that fulfilled both the higher (or lower) levels in the WMI Sham vs. WLI Sham and the higher (or lower) WMI PrePubOVX vs. WMI Sham comparisons.

For matching the OFT behavioral profile, no significant difference is needed between WLI and WMI Shams or WLI PrePubOVX and WLI Sham in their hippocampal transcript levels, but a significant difference in either direction between WMI PrePubOVX and WMI Sham (Tables 1–3.) These genes are Traf6, RGD1304694, Frk, Dpp6, Usp6nl, Tspan7, and Dpy19l3 (Figure S3B in Supplementary Material), of which Frk, Dpp6, and Dpy19l3 expression were confirmed. Since WLI PrePubOVX showed non-significantly greater immobility behavior in the FST compared with WMI PrePubOVX, we randomly selected some genes for qPCR measurements for the WLI PrePubOVX vs. WMI PrePubOVX comparison (Table 4). All three of these genes, Pigh, Rtkn2, and Cep104 showed significant differences in their hippocampal expression between these groups (Figure S3C in Supplementary Material).

The correlation between the RNA-Seq FC (Tables 1–4) and their corresponding RT-qPCR FC was calculated for the genes shown in Figure S3 in Supplementary Material (r = 0.90, p < 0.01) (Figure S4 in Supplementary Material).

Network Analyses Using IPA

The IPA canonical pathway analysis between the two strains under Sham conditions revealed significant alternations in pathways related to cellular movement (Daxx, Frk, Dlg1, Map3k2, Mapk13, and more) and immune cell trafficking (Traf6, Tnfrsf4, HLA-A, Il9r, Ifngr1, and more). The top network (Fisher’s t-test p = 10⁻³⁹) is shown in Figure S5 in Supplementary Material. Interconnectedness by different kinases, the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (Erk1/2), c-Jun N-terminal kinase, P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (P38 Mapk), phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase as well as interferon alpha and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5a and b (Stat5a and b) is also demonstrated.

Differentially expressed genes between WLI PrePubOVX and WLI Sham form the network (Fisher’s t-test p = 10⁻⁴⁰) displayed in Figure S6 in Supplementary Material. Major hubs in this network are the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (Nfκb) and the vascular endothelial factor (Vegf). Activating the inflammatory signaling pathway, Nfκb is involved in cytokine-induced depressive behavior (44). VEGF is implicated in neuronal survival, neuroprotection, differentiation, and axonal growth, and its levels are reduced in the cerebrospinal fluid of severely depressed patients (45).

The most significant network (Fisher’s t-test p = 10⁻³⁹) produced from WMI PrePubOVX and WMI Sham DEGs is shown in Figure S7 in Supplementary Material. Major hubs in this network also include Nfκb, Erk1, P38 MAPK, and Casp8 (caspase 8, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase). Functions of several DEGs in this network are related to energy homeostasis (Tshr, Slc2a3, and Lepr), or to neurodegeneration (Nox1, Herpud1, or Casp8). In addition, although expression of thyroid hormone receptor alpha (Thra) was decreased in both strains after prepubertal ovariectomy (see Figure S6 in Supplementary Material also), Tshr expression was upregulated only in the WMI PrePubOVX hippocampus compared with Sham. This implies a unique regulatory connection between Thra and Tshr in the WMI PrePubOVX hippocampus.

Differentially expressed genes of the WMI PrePubOVX vs. WLI PrePubOVX comparison generate an IPA network (Fisher’s t-test p = 10⁻⁴¹) that shows a surprisingly large number of glucocorticoid signaling pathway regulators such as the glucocorticoid receptor (Nr3c1), Crebbp, Hsp90, Hsp90aa1, Stub1, Endog, Dynll2, and Taf5 (Figure 2). It is also of interest that this network shows no overlap with the between strain, Sham comparison (WLI Sham vs. WMI Sham) network (Figure S5 in Supplementary Material).

Figure 2.

The most significant IPA Generated Network of Wistar Kyoto (WKY) more immobile (WMI) PrePubOVX vs. WKY less immobile (WLI) PrePubOVX differentially expressed genes (DEGs). DEGs with p < 0.01 were submitted to IPA with their corresponding fold changes using settings that allow for direct and indirect connections to other members of the network. Colored members are DEGs, while gray color indicates non-DEG connectors. The molecular/biological characteristics of the members are indicated in the legend.

As determined by RT-qPCR hippocampal estrogen receptor alpha (Esr1) transcript levels were significantly higher in WMIs than WLIs [strain, F(1,28) = 7.77, p < 0.01]. This difference originated from the transcript levels in Sham animals with no strain differences between the PrePubOVX adult females (Figure 3A). Specifically, while PrePubOVX increased Esr1 expression in the WLI hippocampus compared with its Sham levels, it did not change it in the WMIs [condition, F(2,28) = 43.92, p < 0.01; strain × condition, F(2,28) = 6.69, p < 0.01]. EA Esr1 levels were significantly lower in both strains of females compared with those of PrePubOVX. The major findings in the expression profile of estrogen receptor beta (Esr2) were the lower transcript levels of the Sham and PrePubOVX WMIs compared with their WLI counterparts [Figure 3B, strain, F(1,32) = 45.36, p < 0.01; condition, F(2,32) = 24.40, p < 0.01; strain × condition, F(2,32) = 3.65, p < 0.05]. This is the opposite of that of Esr1 expression strain differences. Hippocampal expression of estrogen-related receptor—alpha (Essra) differed only by strain between adult PrePubOVX females, where the WLIs showed upregulation [Figure 3C, strain, F(1,33) = 7.47, p = 0.01; condition, F(2,33) = 22.69, p < 0.01]. Finally, glucocorticoid receptor (Nr3c1) transcript levels showed a condition-dependent expression profile very similar to that of Esr2 in both strains (Figure 3D). Specifically, Nr3c1 expression was lower in the WMI hippocampus compared with WLI [strain, F(1,31) = 53.67, p < 0.01] and was modified by ovarian hormone status [condition, F(2,31) = 24.42, p < 0.01]. This change differed between WLIs and WMIs, as Nr3c1 transcript levels tended to increase by PrePubOVX only in WLIs, while EA transcript levels differed from the adult Shams’ only in the WMIs [strain × condition, F(2,31) = 4.49, p < 0.05].

Figure 3.

Lack of ovarian hormones before puberty [early adolescents (EA)] or by PrePubOVX affects hippocampal expression of estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors. Gene expression levels as measured by RT-qPCR. (A) Estrogen receptor alpha (Esr1). (B) Estrogen receptor beta (Esr2). (C) Estrogen-related receptor alpha (Esrra), and (D) glucocorticoid receptor (Nr3c1). Relative quantification (RQ) are Ct values normalized to GAPDH, and then to a universal calibrator calculated using the −ΔΔCt method. **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 are within strain group comparisons compared with Sham animals, ^##p < 0.01 and ^#p < 0.05 are within strain compared with PrePubOVX animals, lines marked by **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 are for strain comparisons, all by Bonferroni-corrected post hoc analyses. ^{^}p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test, as hypothesis testing between two groups, when ANOVA is significant or a trend (p < 0.1). Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Discussion

This is the first study to assert behavioral and hippocampal molecular changes resulting from the interaction of genetic predisposition to depressive behavior with the lack of ovarian hormone regulated processes during adolescent development. Lack of ovarian hormones during and after puberty exaggerated both depression- and anxiety-like behaviors of the WMI females with genetic predisposition to despair-like behavior. In the absence of this genetic predisposition, prepubertal ovariectomy resulted in a dramatic increase in depression-like behavior without effects on anxiety-like behavior in the WLI control strain. Hippocampal transcriptomes of the two strains of animals that were Sham-ovariectomized did not differ dramatically, as expected, due to the genetic relatedness of these two strains. However, the two strains responded differently to prepubertal ovariectomy in their hippocampal transcriptomic changes. Furthermore, transcript level differences in estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus of PrePubOVX vs. Sham females suggest that the lack of ovarian hormones affect the WLI females more profoundly, in parallel with the dramatic increase in their depression-like behavior.

In preclinical studies, there is evidence for antidepressive effects of E2. Removal of the E2 primary source by ovariectomy increases depressive behavior in the FST (14, 46–51), and E2 replacement reverses this effect. Thus, the rising levels of E2 at puberty should attenuate depression-like behavior, but instead, it is when female prevalence of depression becomes evident in humans and depression-like behavior is increased in the genetic model of depression, the WMI (21). Thus, the actions of E2, or ovarian hormones during puberty may differ from that in adulthood. In this study, the exaggerated depression-like behavior of the PrePubOVX females could be the result of the continuing absence of ovarian hormones during both puberty and in adulthood. Whether the effect of OVX during only the pubertal period would be the same will have to be determined in the future.

In women, anxiety is frequently comorbid with depression (52, 53), and this is reflected in most animal models of depression as they exhibit both behaviors. The WMIs and WLIs were bidirectionally selected based on depression-like behavior from the parental WKY strain, which shows both depression- and anxiety-like behaviors (22–24). Since we selected for depression-like behavior, anxiety-like behavior likely segregated independently as illustrated by the male WLIs showing higher anxiety-like behavior than WMIs, which is not modified by developmental age (21). While EA WMI females showed less anxiety-like behavior than WLI females similarly to males, adult female WMIs were as anxious as WLIs (21). Prepubertally ovariectomized WMIs showed greater anxiety-like behavior in the OFT than their Sham controls, while in contrast to depression-like behavior, removal of ovarian hormones prepubertally had no effect on the anxiety-like behavior of the WLIs. Other studies also report no effect of prepubertal ovariectomy on OFT behavior in a routinely used rat strain (13). By contrast, adult age ovariectomy increases anxiety-like behavior in rodents (54–56), and hormone replacement reduces these behaviors in ovariectomized female rats (54, 56–62). Whether the anxiolytic effects of ovarian hormones are more profound in adulthood than in puberty is another question this study cannot answer. Nevertheless, ovarian hormone-dependent processes seem to specifically affect the WMI strain.

Estrogen-dependent synaptogenesis, which could affect behavior, is known to depend on estrogen receptors, Esr1 and Esr2 or ERα and ERβ (63, 64). ERα is present in nuclear and extranuclear sites and inhibitory neurons (63). Extranuclear ERβ is present in principal cells and in a few inhibitory cells (64). Since the hippocampal expression profiles of Er1 and Er2 were the complete opposite between WLI and WMI Sham females, one would assume that their actions would also differ. It has been suggested that ERβ (Esr2) mediates the anxiolytic properties of estrogen (65), although expression of the hippocampal Esr2 of WMIs did not parallel their behavior in the OFT. Interestingly, no change was found in hippocampal transcript levels of estrogen or glucocorticoid receptors in the WMI females in response to prepubertal ovariectomy. Whether that is due to a so far unresolved cause of resistance to estrogen or to glucocorticoids in this strain is not known, but definitely deserve further experimentation.

The RNA-Seq results provided insights into the transcriptomic differences in the hippocampus resulting from the strain differences and/or caused by prepubertal ovariectomy in both strains. One important finding is the small number of DEGs between the strains, which underlie the genetic closeness of these two strains generated from the semi-inbred WKY strain (39). Further, there was no overlap between the WLIs and WMIs DEGs in response to prepubertal ovariectomy. This suggests that the molecular processes resulting in the increased depression-like behavior after the removal of ovarian hormones prepubertally are different in the two strains. In addition, DEGs between the WMI PrePubOVX and WLI PrePubOVX do not overlap with the DEGs between Shams, intimating that even the ovarian hormone-independent components of the neurodevelopmental processes are different between these strains.

The evaluation of hippocampal gene expression changes that parallel the behavioral changes in the two strains after prepubertal ovariectomy revealed some DEGs with potential relevance to human behavior. For example, hippocampal expression of the solute carrier family 22 (organic anion transporter), member 7 (Slc22A7) was dramatically higher in the WLI PrePubOVX females compared their Sham counterparts, and sequence variation of this gene was suggested to contribute to autism spectrum disorder, ALS, or schizophrenia (66). Interestingly, Dpp6 (dipeptidyl peptidase-like 6), with expression parallel to the increased anxiety of PrePubOVX WMI females is also a candidate gene for ALS (67). Sequence variation in the Dpy19l3 (Dpy-19-like C-mannosyltransferase 3) gene has been suggested to contribute to bipolar disorder (68). While these findings are not directly relevant to the current goals of the study, they indicate that these seemingly disparate biochemical entities can have behavioral relevance.

A less surprising finding is that the highly connected genes in the WMI PrePubOVX vs. WLI PrePubOVX network are members of the glucocorticoid signaling pathway. These include the glucocorticoid receptor (Nr3c1) and the essential components of glucocorticoid receptor function, Hsp90 and Hsp90aa1, with decreased expression in the WMI Sham and PrePubOVX hippocampus compared with those of WLIs. Crebbp, which is a coactivator of the glucocorticoid receptor, can also function conditionally as a negative regulator of its activities. It is upregulated to a similar degree in both PrePubOVX and Sham WMIs, suggesting that Crebbp expression is related to the genetic differences between the strains and is not affected by ovarian hormones. Decreased functioning of glucocorticoid receptors has been heavily implicated in depression etiology (38), and because downregulation of Nr3c1 occurs in the WMI genetic model regardless of ovarian status, this may be not be the responsible mechanism for the PrePubOVX-induced increase in depression-like behavior in the WMIs. Interestingly, this pattern is the same for the hippocampal expression of the estrogen receptors, none of which show change by PrePubOVX in WMIs. By contrast, expression of all of these receptors increases by PrePubOVX in the WLIs. The dramatic increase in depression-like behavior in the WLI females when ovarian hormones are absent seems to parallel the changes in glucocorticoid and estrogen receptor expression, while the moderate change in both depression- and anxiety-like behaviors in the WMI females seems to be independent of them. Whether this major difference in the regulation of these nuclear receptors reflect a difference in sensitivity to hormones, glucocorticoids. or estrogen, cannot be determined from this study.

Pubertal status may play a role in behaviors associated with stress (69), such as depression and anxiety, since puberty is a period with heightened sensitivity to stressors (70). Adolescent animals display greater hormonal stress responses compared with adults following various stressors (71–73), and the adolescent brain seems to be more responsive to the stress-related hormones than the adult brain (74). In addition, brain areas relevant to affective behaviors continue to mature during adolescence (75). Whether a change in ovarian hormonal milieu, continuing brain development, increased stress responsiveness, or a combination of these factors is responsible for the unique vulnerability to the development of affective disorders during puberty is unknown. Future studies administering ovarian hormones to ovariectomized adult females of both strains can aid in discerning some of the mechanisms of these behavioral changes. In those studies, additional brain regions such as the bed nucleus of stria terminalis, amygdala, and the hypothalamus, known to be involved in depression and hormonal regulation of behavior, will likely be explored. The current findings indicate that lack of ovarian hormones during development can exaggerate depression-like behavior in adult females with or without a genetic contribution to depression. The distinct prepubertal ovariectomy-induced transcriptomic profiles in the two strains further confirm that genetic vulnerability and hormonal state-induced vulnerability might act via different pathways to generate similar behavioral profiles.

Ethics Statement

This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations by the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 9th edition. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Northwestern University.

Author Contributions

The study was designed by ER and NR. The experiments were carried out by NR, WL, and SC. The data were analyzed by NR, HC, MS, WL, LW, and ER. The manuscript was written and edited by NR, HC, MS, WL, and ER. All the authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at http://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2017.00373/full#supplementary-material.

Figure S1

Schematics of the experimental design. Timings of prepubertal ovariectomy, behavioral testing, and hippocampal tissue collection are indicated. Puberty was marked to begin at postnatal day 34, by which time 20% of females demonstrate the criteria of puberty as described previously (Holehan AM, Merry BJ, The control of puberty in the dietary restricted female rat. Mech Ageing Dev (1985) 32:179–91.).

Figure S2

Differential RNA expression between Wistar Kyoto (WKY) less immobile (WLI) PrePubOVX and WKY more immobile (WMI) PrePubOVX hippocampus. Volcano plots showing −log (p-value) vs. log 2 fold change (FC) in RNA abundance in transcripts between the strains after PrePubOVX. Red circles denote significant differences (FDR corrected p < 0.05). FC cutoff is set at fold change (FC) > 1.3 or fold change < 0.7.

Figure S3

Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) selected to parallel behaviors in the forced swim test (FST) or open field test (OFT) (A) Wistar Kyoto (WKY) less immobile (WLI) Sham vs. WKY More immobile (WMI) Sham and WLI PrePubOVX vs. WLI Sham comparison, proposed to parallel WLI behavior in the FST: Il9r; Nme7; and Slc22a7. (B) WMI PrePubOVX vs. WMI Sham comparison, proposed to mirror their behavior in the OFT: Traf6, RGD1304604, Frk, Dpp6, Usp6nl, Tspan7, and Dpy19l3. (C) WLI PrePubOVX vs. WMI PrePubOVX comparison, with non-significant behavioral differences in the FST: Pigh, Rtkn2, and Cep104. Relative quantification (RQ) calculated using the 2^−ΔΔCt method, after normalizing to GAPDH and a general hippocampal calibrator sample. **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 by Bonferroni-corrected post hoc analyses following a two-way ANOVA; ^{^^}p < 0.01 hypothesis testing by Student’s t-test when ANOVA is significant or a trend (p < 0.1). Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Figure S4

Significant Spearman correlation between RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) and RT-qPCR. Fold change determined by quantitative RT-PCR or RNA-Seq of genes shown on Figure S3 in Supplementary Material.

Figure S5

The most significant IPA Generated Network of Wistar Kyoto (WKY) more immobile (WMI) Sham vs. WKY less immobile (WLI) Sham differentially expressed genes (DEGs). DEGs with p < 0.01 were submitted to IPA with their corresponding fold changes using settings that allow for direct and indirect connections to other members of the network. Colored members are DEGs, while grey color indicates non-DEG connectors. The molecular/biological characteristics of the members are indicated in the legend.

Figure S6

The most significant IPA Generated Network Wistar Kyoto (WKY) less immobile (WLI) Sham vs. WLI PrePubOVX differentially expressed genes (DEGs). DEGs with p < 0.01 were submitted to IPA with their corresponding fold changes using settings that allow for direct and indirect connections to other members of the network. Colored members are DEGs, while grey color indicates non-DEG connectors. The molecular/biological characteristics of the members are indicated in the legend.

Figure S7

The most significant IPA Generated Network Wistar Kyoto (WKY) more immobile (WMI) Sham vs. WMI PrePubOVX differentially expressed genes (DEGs). DEGs with p < 0.01 were submitted to IPA with their corresponding fold changes using settings that allow for direct and indirect connections to other members of the network. Colored members are DEGs, while grey color indicates non-DEG connectors. The molecular/biological characteristics of the members are indicated in the legend.