Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2018 Jan 27;5(1):ofx277. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx277

Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for Gram-Positive Bacteremia at the End of Life to Facilitate Hospice Care: A Report of 3 Cases

Rupak Datta 1,, Dayna McManus 2, Jeffrey Topal 1,2, Manisha Juthani-Mehta 1
PMCID: PMC5788065  PMID: 29399598

Abstract

Administering and monitoring intravenous antimicrobials may cause discomfort in patients at the end of life and delay transition to hospice. We describe 3 patients with terminal cancer with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus gallolyticus, and Granulicatella adiacens bacteremia who were managed with the long-acting lipoglycopeptide oritavancin to facilitate discharge to hospice.

Keywords: antimicrobials, end-of-life, palliative care


There are limited data on antimicrobial use in hospice care [1, 2]. Available studies suggest that one-third of advanced cancer patients entering hospice remain on antimicrobials, of which two-thirds receive antimicrobials until the day of death [3–5]. Most antimicrobial use in hospice is intended to treat infection-related symptoms, but only 15% to 37% of patients achieve symptom relief with antimicrobials [4–6]. Furthermore, once patients are initiated on antimicrobials, withdrawing therapy may be difficult [7].

Several factors complicate antimicrobial use in hospice care. First, antimicrobials are inconsistently addressed across states in advance care planning. Second, administering and monitoring intravenous antimicrobials with catheters and blood draws may burden patients in whom the goals of care emphasize comfort. Third, the route of administration may be impacted by hospice facilities as many prohibit intravenous antimicrobials [8]. Additionally, evaluating infection may be challenging as fever and leukocytosis may be absent or due to alternative causes and symptom assessment may be limited by cognitive impairment or delirium.

Finally, the indication for antimicrobials may be ill defined. For many functional and cognitively intact patients, antimicrobials may be prescribed empirically though occasionally inappropriately (eg, asymptomatic bacteriuria). For obtunded patients, even with documented infection, intravenous antimicrobials may be inappropriate as they may impede transition to hospice. However, select patients may nevertheless benefit from antimicrobials. Managing infection in such patients without oral therapeutic alternatives may be challenging as continued intravenous antimicrobial therapy may delay transition to hospice. We report 3 cases of Gram-positive bacteremia managed with the long-acting lipoglycopeptide oritavancin to facilitate timely transition to hospice care.

CASE REPORT 1

A 64 year-old gentleman with poorly controlled diabetes and previously treated hepatitis C virus infection was admitted with fatigue, anorexia, and unintentional 20-pound weight loss. His initial exam was notable for a cachectic appearance and I/VI systolic ejection murmur. Laboratory data revealed an elevated alkaline phosphatase with mild transaminitis and serum alpha fetoprotein of >200 000 ng/mL. A presumptive diagnosis of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma was made in the setting of an occlusive portal vein thrombus, multifocal hepatic lesions, and extensive destructive lesions of the thoracic spine noted on imaging. On hospital day 7, he developed a new fever secondary to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Tagged white blood cell scan revealed uptake in the lungs only, and the patient declined transesophageal echocardiogram. Despite therapeutic levels of vancomycin, the patient remained bacteremic for 7 days, and his course was complicated by acute kidney injury. His bacteremia ultimately cleared following the administration of telavancin, after which the patient opted to pursue hospice care. As hospice placement was precluded by the cost of telavancin, and further nonanalgesic intravenous medications were discordant with goals of care, he received a single dose of oritavancin, which has been shown be active against MRSA (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] 50 of 0.003 ug/mL) [9]. Following oritavancin administration on the day of discharge to hospice, he experienced continued pain requiring increasing patient-controlled analgesia without fever recurrence. The patient died 15 days after receiving oritavancin.

CASE REPORT 2

A 72 year-old lady with non–small cell lung cancer, initially treated with right lower lobe lobectomy and radiation therapy, with recurrence to the left deltoid and right chest wall who was actively receiving palliative radiation therapy was admitted with confusion and acute-onset dyspnea. Physical exam was notable for tachycardia, hypoxia with 72% oxygen saturation on room air, diffuse wheezing, and a large, nontender mass on the right chest wall. Chest computed tomography revealed a 11 × 10-cm right anterior chest wall necrotic mass with invasion of the right pectoral muscle with left upper lobe pulmonary emboli. She developed a fever on hospital day 3 and was found to have penicillin-intermediate Streptococcus gallolyticus bacteremia. Transthoracic echocardiogram findings were limited by patient delirium with motion artifact. Her bacteremia cleared after 3 days of ceftriaxone therapy. Following family discussions, she opted to pursue hospice care. At that time, the patient had received 2 weeks of a planned 6-week course of antimicrobial therapy. Due to intermediate penicillin resistance, she was given 1 dose of oritavancin, which has activity against S. bovis (MIC 50 of 0.03 mg/mL) [10] to facilitate discharge to hospice. Following oritavancin administration, she was treated symptomatically with hydromorphone and lorazepam and remained afebrile. She died in hospice care 2 weeks after receiving oritavancin.

CASE REPORT 3

A 69 year-old lady with stage IV non–small cell lung cancer with brain metastases treated with left lower lobe lobectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with radiation gamma knife therapy was admitted with confusion, malaise, and falls. Initial physical exam revealed temporal wasting, II/VI ejection murmur, and diffuse upper and lower extremity weakness. She was unable to follow commands. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed interval progression of a right occipital lobe mass and left lateral ventricle mass involving the choroid plexus with large adjacent edema. Subsequently, she developed fever and hypotension and was found to have Granulicatella adiacens bacteremia. She was started on vancomycin, and surveillance blood cultures were negative. Transthoracic echocardiogram revealed no valvular vegetations. To accommodate the patient’s desire to treat infection and promote comfort without prolonged antimicrobials, a single dose of oritavancin was administered that has activity against viridans group Streptococci (MIC 50 of 0.008 mg/mL) [10], from which Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute interpretative criteria for Granulicatella are derived. Following oritavancin administration, she was discharged home with hospice care and remained alert without recurrent falls. She died 5 weeks after receipt of oritavancin.

DISCUSSION

We present 3 patients with advanced cancer and Gram-positive bacteremia who were managed with a long-acting lipoglycopeptide at the end of life to overcome the challenges associated with standard intravenous antimicrobials. Intravenous antimicrobials confer risks of phlebitis, skin and soft tissue infection, and bacteremia with central line devices. Peripheral catheters may also cause pain and necessitate mechanical restraints, particularly in patients with difficulty tolerating oral medications. In hospice patients, these risks associated with intravenous antimicrobials may conflict with the stated goals of comfort.

Consensus recommendations are lacking for antimicrobial use at the end of life. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines suggest that antimicrobial stewardship programs should provide support to clinicians in decisions related to antimicrobial use [11]. Patients with advanced cancer may represent an emerging population for stewardship intervention given that antimicrobial use may be driven by the high prevalence of noninfectious fever caused by neoplasm, thrombus, or medication and the desire to provide symptom relief. Additionally, continued intravenous antimicrobial therapy may delay timely transition to hospice care.

The use of long-acting lipoglycopeptides at the end of life may appeal to hospice patients. Oritavancin has been shown to be effective in the treatment of serious infections with Gram-positive bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp [12]. With a terminal half-life of 393 hours, oritavancin can be administered as a single-dose regimen with therapeutic levels up to 4 weeks, which precludes the need for repeated intravenous doses [12]. Moreover, dose adjustment is frequently unnecessary by virtue of its clearance by the reticuloendothelial system rather than the kidney or liver. This agent has already been described in the treatment of a variety of Gram-positive bacteremias [13].

In the context of end-of-life care, oritavancin may confer many benefits. Repeated dosing or drug monitoring with blood tests is unnecessary. Continued hospitalization for intravenous antimicrobials becomes preventable, thereby facilitating timely transition to hospice care. Patients and families may feel reassured that infection is still being treated without the associated discomfort of intravenous injections. Collectively, this intervention may be desirable to patients and families. Although its wholesale price is high, oritavancin may reduce the length of inpatient care. Future studies should consider quantifying clinical outcomes including patient comfort and length of stay following administration of oritavancin versus usual care for the management of invasive Gram-positive infections at the end of life.

Other long-acting antimicrobials have also been described for the management of invasive Gram-positive infections. Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with a long half-life of 9–12 days. Dosing intervals of 1 week have been proposed to maintain minimum inhibitory concentrations above bactericidal concentrations for target pathogens. Dalbavancin has been used effectively in the treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infections [14]. Recent data also suggest that dalbavancin can be used in the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia secondary to septic phlebitis [15]. The pharmacokinetic properties of oritavancin and dalbavancin, as well as their broad spectrum of activity, are conductive to the palliative management of infections at the end of life. Table 1 shows additional antimicrobials conducive to infection management at the end of life.

Table 1. .

Select Antibiotics Conducive to Palliative Infection Management at the End of Life

Antimicrobial Spectrum of Activity Dosing Half-Life, h Dose Adjustment for Renal Dysfunction
Oritavancin [12] Gram-positive organisms 1200 mg IV × 1 393 No
Dalbavancin [16] Gram-positive organisms 1500 mg IV × 1 204 CrCl < 30 mL/min: 1125 mg IV × 1
No dose adjustments in hemodialysis
Gentamicin [17] Gram-negative organisms 5–7 mg/kg IV every 24–72 ha 2–4 CrCl 40–59 mL/min: 7 mg/kg every 36 h
CrCl 20–39 mL/min: 7 mg/kg every 48 h
CrCl < 20 mL/min: 2 mg/kg × 1, re-dose per levels
Ertapenem [18] Gram-negative, Gram-positive, and anaerobic organisms 1000 mg IV/IMb every 24 h 4 CrCl < 30 mL/min: 500 mg every 24 h
Ceftriaxone [19] Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms 1000 mg IV/IMb every 24 h 6–9 No

Abbreviations: CrCl, creatinine clearance; IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous.

aDependent on creatinine clearance (mL/min).

bReconstitute with 1% lidocaine, per package insert.

In summary, we provide cases of infection management at the end of life that attempt to merge best practices from infectious diseases and palliative care through the use of a long-acting lipoglycopeptide oritavancin. Long-acting lipoglycopeptides have broad Gram-positive coverage, avoid the risks and discomfort associated with repeated intravenous dosing and drug monitoring, and offer therapeutic benefit in patients unable to tolerate oral antimicrobials. These agents may circumvent potential limitations introduced by hospice agencies precluding intravenous antimicrobials and address the desire of patients to treat infection at the end of life. When antimicrobial therapy is indicated per goals-of-care discussions for hospice-eligible patients without oral alternatives, clinicians should consider the utility of long-acting lipoglycopeptides to facilitate transition to hospice.

Acknowledgments

Informed consent. Given that these patients are deceased and their information has been de-identified, informed consent was not required as per the Yale Human Investigations Committee.

Financial support. This work was supported by 2T32AI007517-16 at the Yale School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases.

Potential conflicts of interest.Dr. Juthani-Mehta has served on the Advisory Board of Iterum Therapeutics International Limited. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

  • 1. Albrecht JS, McGregor JC, Fromme EK et al. . A nationwide analysis of antibiotic use in hospice care in the final week of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013; 46:483–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rosenberg JH, Albrecht JS, Fromme EK et al. . Antimicrobial use for symptom management in patients receiving hospice and palliative care: a systematic review. J Palliat Med 2013; 16:1568–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Merel SE, Meier CA, McKinney CM, Pottinger PS. Antimicrobial use in patients on a comfort care protocol: a retrospective cohort study. J Palliat Med 2016; 19:1210–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Oh DY, Kim JH, Kim DW et al. . Antibiotic use during the last days of life in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2006; 15:74–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Novak RL, Noble BN, Fromme EK et al. . Antibiotic policies and utilization in oregon hospice programs. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2016; 33:777–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Helde-Frankling M, Bergqvist J, Bergman P, Bjorkhem-Bergman L. Antibiotic treatment in end-of-life cancer patients-a retrospective observational study at a palliative care center in Sweden. Cancers 2016; 8:84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Stiel S, Krumm N, Pestinger M et al. . Antibiotics in palliative medicine–results from a prospective epidemiological investigation from the HOPE survey. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20:325–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Oneschuk D, Fainsinger R, Demoissac D. Antibiotic use in the last week of life in three different palliative care settings. J Palliat Care 2002; 18:25–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mendes RE, Sader HS, Flamm RK et al. . Oritavancin activity against Staphylococcus aureus causing invasive infections in U.S. and European hospitals: a 5-year international surveillance program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58:2921–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mendes RE, Sader HS, Flamm RK, Jones RN. Activity of oritavancin tested against uncommonly isolated Gram-positive pathogens responsible for documented infections in hospitals worldwide. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69:1579–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM et al. . Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:e51–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tice A. Oritavancin: a new opportunity for outpatient therapy of serious infections. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54(Suppl 3):S239–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Stewart CL, Turner MS, Frens JJ et al. . Real-world experience with oritavancin therapy in invasive gram-positive infections. Infect Dis Ther 2017; 6:277–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Raad I, Darouiche R, Vazquez J et al. . Efficacy and safety of weekly dalbavancin therapy for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:374–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Cho JC, Estrada SJ, Beltran AJ, Revuelta MP. Treatment of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia secondary to septic phlebitis using dalbavancin. J Clin Pharm Ther 2015; doi:10.1111/jcpt.12306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Product Information: DALVANCE Intravenous Injection, Dalbavancin Intravenous Injection. Parsippany, NJ: Durata Therapeutics Inc; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Product Information: Gentamicin Intramuscular Injection Solution, Intravenous Injection Solution. Lake Zurich, IL: Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Product Information: INVANZ Intravenous Infusion, Intramuscular Injection, Ertapenem Intravenous Infusion, Intramuscular Injection. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Product Information: ROCEPHIN IV, IM Injection, Ceftriaxone Sodium IV, IM Injection. San Francisco, CA: Genentech USA, Inc; 2010. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES