Table 2. Performance of the proposed DHSpred along with the state-of-the-art methods.
Method | MCC | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Pt | Py |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHSpred | 0.660 | 0.871 | 0.655 | 0.952 | 0.624 | 0.607 |
iDHS-EL | 0.636 | 0.861 | 0.646 | 0.943 | 0.609 | 0.589 |
RevcKmer | 0.616 | 0.852 | 0.654 | 0.928 | 0.607 | 0.582 |
PseTNC | 0.610 | 0.861 | 0.607 | 0.946 | 0.574 | 0.553 |
PseDNC | 0.571 | 0.837 | 0.611 | 0.923 | 0.563 | 0.533 |
The first column represents the method name employed in this study. The second, the third, the fourth and the fifth, the sixth and the seventh respectively represent the MCC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Pt and Py. Bold font denotes the best result.