Skip to main content
Journal of Physical Therapy Science logoLink to Journal of Physical Therapy Science
. 2018 Jan 27;30(1):23–26. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.23

The effect of actively induced vibration using shoulder joint on pain and dysfunction in patients with low back pain

Dong-Kyu Lee 1, Yong-Nam Kim 2,*, Chi-Bok Park 3, Mi-Sook Park 4
PMCID: PMC5788768  PMID: 29410559

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to determine the effect of a Flexi-Bar exercise program with vibration stimulation on pain and dysfunction in patients with low back pain. [Subjects and Methods] This study included 30 patients with low back pain. The participants were divided into a control (n=15) group and an experimental group (n=15). General physical therapy was used in both groups. A Flexi-Bar exercise program with vibration stimulation was used in the experimental group. The Visual Analog Scale was used to measure pain severity. The Oswestry Disability Index was used to measure the extent of dysfunction due to low back pain. [Results] The VAS and ODI of the experimental group showed a significant difference compared to that of the control group. [Conclusion] The results show that a Flexi-Bar exercise program with vibration stimulation is effective in alleviating pain and dysfunction in patients with low back pain.

Keywords: Flexi-Bar, Pain, Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Patients with low back pain experience continuous pain, and dynamic contributory factors include malfunction of the lumbar muscles, including the internal oblique, transversus abdominis, and multifidus1). Lower limb and waist pain are increased on walking and standing in patients with low back pain2). Low back pain is caused by lumbar instability, with weakened muscles, soft tissue damage, and degenerative changes. Lumbar stability enables conscious or unconscious control of major and minor joint movements2, 3). To perform fluid movements, harmonious co-contraction is required between the deep muscles (which correctly maintain lumbar alignment and provide stability) and the superficial muscles (which manage external loads or enable psychokinesis)3, 4). Stabilizing exercise induces co-contraction of trunk muscles and improves posture stability by restoring the ability to control functional posture and movement5). Such exercise is essential for lumbar pain patients, because it is not subject to limitations of place, time, or cost6). Although stabilizing exercise has its benefits, a limitation is the need for the assistance of a therapist to accurately perform movements; similar to isometric exercise, it is difficult to motivate participation to prevent recurrence of disease, and to correctly determine the amount and intensity of exercise5, 6). The Flexi-Bar is a 152-cm-long flexible bar that transmits 5-Hz vibration stimulation to the entire body and stimulates muscular activity of the limbs and trunk while the user actively shakes the flexible bar7). The Flexi-Bar is safe at low-amplitude vibration stimulation, and can easily be used without special techniques7). The speed and amplitude of vibration caused by the Flexi-Bar can be controlled by active vibration stimulation release by the user7, 8). A strong point is that it can be performed in various positions safely and easily8). Monfort-Pañego et al.9) reported that the Flexi-Bar can improve lumbar stability if used in the correct position, posture, and amplitude. This study aimed to determine the effect of a Flexi-Bar exercise program with vibration stimulation on pain and dysfunction in patients with low back pain.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This research was aimed at chronic lumbar pain patients with more than 3 months of symptoms. Thirty subjects who understood the nature of the research volunteered to participate in the experiment; 15 subjects (7 men, 8 women) were randomly assigned to the control group, and 15 (7 men, 8 women) to the experimental group. Inclusion criteria were lumbar pain lasting more than 3 months, no history of spine surgery, and the ability to exercise. A history of spine surgery, neurologic symptoms or injury, or inflammatory joint disease were reasons for exclusion. This study complied with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was received from each participant. The ethics committee of Nambu University approved this study. The general characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The mean age, height, and weight were 60.0 ± 11.0 yrs, 168.6 ± 8.0 cm, and 67.0 ± 4.9 kg in the experimental group and 63.6 ± 7.6 yrs, 165.4 ± 7.7 cm, and 68.4 ± 8.0 kg in the control group, respectively. All subjects received lumbar thermotherapy for 30 minutes, electrotherapy for 20 minutes, and ultrasonic therapy for 5 minutes. Both the experimental and control groups stopped drug therapy throughout the course of this research. Additionally, Flexi-Bar exercise with vibration stimulation was provided to the experimental group 5 times a week for 6 weeks. The Flexi-Bar is 153 cm long, weighs 710 g, and is 9.5 mm thick. Exercise can be controlled by changing its weight or thickness. The Flexi-Bar vibrates 270 times per minute, and can be used to exercise the shoulder joint and entire body. Vibration at approximately 5 Hz causes simultaneous contraction of the shoulder and trunk muscles, improves muscular strength and stability in the shoulders and trunk, and enhances proprioceptive sensation. We made the participant hold a Flexi-Bar horizontally with them standing up to start vibration exercise laterally for 10 seconds; then, he was made to held it vertically to do for the same time. Also, we set 10 times as one set and applied 10 sets. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to measure pain severity. A linear scale marked 0–10 shows the extent of pain. No pain is defined as 0; maximum pain is 10. VAS is also a highly reliable evaluation method that had study subjects directly mark the degree of pain. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to measure the extent of dysfunction due to lumbar pain. The extent of pain, personal hygiene, holding objects, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social activity, sexual activity, and travel and movement are included. ODI is a highly reliable evaluation method that consists of 10 questions, with a total score of 50 points ranging from 0 to 5 on a 6-point scale. It can be judged that the higher the total score is, the higher the functional disorder of low back pain patient is. SPSS statistics 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) software was used to analyze collected data. The paired t-test was used to compare the extent of pain and dysfunction of the experimental and control groups before and after exercise. The independent t-test was used to compare differences between groups. Statistical significance level was set to α=0.05.

Table 1. General characteristics of subjects.

Experimental group (n=15) Control group (n=15)
Gender (male/female) 8/7 7/8
Age (years) 60.0 ± 11.0a 63.6 ± 7.6
Weight (kg) 67.0 ± 4.9 68.4 ± 8.0
Height (cm) 168.6 ± 8.0 165.4 ± 7.7

aMean ± SD.

RESULTS

The changes in the results of the VAS and ODI are presented in Table 2. There were significant differences in these results before and after the experimental intervention. On comparison between the groups, there were greater improvements in the results of the VAS and ODI in the experimental group.

Table 2. Comparison of the results of the VAS and ODI between the experimental and control groups.

Group Pre Post Difference value
VAS (score) Experimental group 6.8 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 1.3* –3.1 ± 1.7#
Control group 6.0 ± 0.8 5.7 ± 0.7 –0.3 ± 0.6

ODI (score) Experimental group 35.4 ± 3.1 29.8 ± 1.8* –5.5 ± 3.4#
Control group 33.8 ± 2.7 32.9 ± 2.1 –0.9 ± 1.7

aMean ± SD, VAS: Visual Analog Scale; ODI: Oswestry Disability Index. *p<0.05: Significant differences between pre- and post-test. #p<0.05: Significant differences between the experimental and control groups.

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of a Flexi-Bar exercise program with vibration stimulation on pain and dysfunction in patients with lumbar pain. A clear difference in pain severity was seen in the VAS of the experimental group. In the comparison between groups, the VAS of the experimental group showed greater differences than the control group. Yang and Seo10) reported that pain was alleviated after applying vibration stimulation in patients with lumbar pain. Kim et al.11) reported that vibration stimulation using a sling alleviates lumbar pain. Vibration is a convenient, safe, and inexpensive therapeutic method that has been used to control pain10). Vibration stimulation excites receptors that sense vibration and transfer the pain that is controlled by A-β and large myelinated nerve fibers12). Vibration decreases the levels of substance P-like immunoreactivity in the CSF13). It also has a neurophysiologic placebo effect that reduces transfer of pain from the peripheral pain receptors to the brain12, 13). On the basis of this result, we can state that the Flexi-bar exercise program with vibration stimulation helps to alleviate lumbar pain. Pain is not only troublesome; it also causes functional problems through abnormalities of posture and stability of the trunk14). Kim et al.11) reported that vibration stimulation with a sling decreased the ODI in patients with lumbar pain and improved their functional ability. Moreside et al.14) reported that Bodyblade training with vibration stimulation improves core stability of the trunk by activating the deeper muscles. In our study, the ODI score improved significantly in the experimental group. Bogaerts et al.15) reported that vibration stimulation activates the muscle spindles and strengthens the muscles that maintain posture stability by improving proprioceptive sense. When vibration stimulation is applied, mobilization of α-motor neurons is increased and the core muscles of the trunk are activated by strengthening neuromuscular control and increasing proprioceptive sense16). Vibration stimulation acts on the α-motor neurons, causes contraction of the muscle belly and tendons, and thereby gives rise to myotonic vibration reflection15, 16). This increase in the proprioceptive sense of the muscle is thought to increase muscular activity, as it enables the muscle to carry a greater external load17). The vibration stimulation caused by the Flexi-bar exercise program stimulates the mechanical receptors of the articular capsule of the lumbar joints, enables greater control of posture and motor sense, and improves stability between spinal segments15,16,17). This study showed that vibration exercise using shoulder joint facilitated proprioception and had an influence on trunk stabilization, and had a positive influence on decreasing the pain and improving the functional disorder of low back pain patients. The limitations of this study were that the physical characteristics and habits of the patients could not be modified. Additionally, as the sample size was small, the results cannot be generalized and applied to all patients with lumbar pain. Further studies with larger samples are required.

REFERENCES

  • 1.França FR, Burke TN, Hanada ES, et al. : Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain: a comparative study. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2010, 65: 1013–1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.O’Sullivan PB, Mitchell T, Bulich P, et al. : The relationship between posture and back muscle endurance in industrial workers with flexion-related low back pain. Man Ther, 2006, 11: 264–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wallden M: The neutral spine principle. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2009, 13: 350–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barr KP, Griggs M, Cadby T: Lumbar stabilization: a review of core concepts and current literature, part 2. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2007, 86: 72–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anders C, Brose G, Hofmann GO, et al. : Gender specific activation patterns of trunk muscles during whole body tilt. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2007, 101: 195–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Urquhart DM, Hodges PW: Differential activity of regions of transversus abdominis during trunk rotation. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14: 393–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mileva KN, Kadr M, Amin N, et al. : Acute effects of Flexi-bar vs. Sham-bar exercise on muscle electromyography activity and performance. J Strength Cond Res, 2010, 24: 737–748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Buteau JL, Eriksrud O, Hasson SM: Rehabilitation of a glenohumeral instability utilizing the body blade. Physiother Theory Pract, 2007, 23: 333–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Monfort-Pañego M, Vera-García FJ, Sánchez-Zuriaga D, et al. : Electromyographic studies in abdominal exercises: a literature synthesis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2009, 32: 232–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang J, Seo D: The effects of whole body vibration on static balance, spinal curvature, pain, and disability of patients with low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27: 805–808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim JH, Kim YE, Bae SH, et al. : The effect of the neurac sling exercise on postural balance adjustment and muscular response patterns in chronic low back pain patients. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 1015–1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saijo M, Ito E, Ichinohe T, et al. : Lack of pain reduction by a vibrating local anesthetic attachment: a pilot study. Anesth Prog, 2005, 52: 62–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Webright WG, Randolph BJ, Perrin DH: Comparison of nonballistic active knee extension in neural slump position and static stretch techniques on hamstring flexibility. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1997, 26: 7–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moreside JM, Vera-Garcia FJ, McGill SM: Trunk muscle activation patterns, lumbar compressive forces, and spine stability when using the bodyblade. Phys Ther, 2007, 87: 153–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bogaerts A, Verschueren S, Delecluse C, et al. : Effects of whole body vibration training on postural control in older individuals: a 1 year randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture, 2007, 26: 309–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bosco C, Colli R, Introini E, et al. : Adaptive responses of human skeletal muscle to vibration exposure. Clin Physiol, 1999, 19: 183–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chung JS, Park S, Kim J, et al. : Effects of flexi-bar and non-flexi-bar exercises on trunk muscles activity in different postures in healthy adults. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27: 2275–2278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Physical Therapy Science are provided here courtesy of Society of Physical Therapy Science

RESOURCES