Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Jan 29;8:1725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19962-2

The functional and structural alterations of the striatum in chronic spontaneous urticaria

Yuming Wang 1,2,✉,#, Ji-Liang Fang 4,#, Bingnan Cui 1,#, Jiao Liu 2,3,#, Ping Song 1, Courtney Lang 2, Yan Bao 4, Ruirui Sun 2, Chenchen Xu 1, Xu Ding 1, Zhifang Yan 1, Yuhe Yan 1, Qian Kong 1, Jian Kong 2,
PMCID: PMC5789061  PMID: 29379058

Abstract

The brain has long been known to be the regulation center of itch, but the neuropathology of chronic itch, such as chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), remains unclear. Thus, we aimed to explore the brain areas involved in the pathophysiology of CSU in hopes that our results may provide valuable insights into the treatment of chronic itch conditions. 40 CSU patients and 40 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. Urticaria activity scores 7 (UAS7) were collected to evaluate patient’s clinical symptoms. Amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (ALFF), voxel-based morphometry (VBM), and seed-based resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) analysis were used to assess brain activity and related plasticity. Compared with HCs, CSU patients exhibited 1) higher ALFF values in the right ventral striatum / putamen, which were positively associated with clinical symptoms as measured by UAS7; 2) gray matter volume (GMV) increase in the right ventral striatum and putamen; and 3) decreased rs-FC between the right ventral striatum and the right occipital cortex and between the right putamen and the left precentral gyrus. Using multiple-modality brain imaging tools, we demonstrated the dysfunction of the striatum in CSU. Our results may provide valuable insights into the neuropathology and development of chronic itch.

Introduction

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common disorder characterized by the spontaneous eruption of short-lived (<24 h) itchy wheals, with or without angioedema, for a period longer than 6 weeks1. CSU affects 0.5–1.0% of the population at any given time and severely diminishes the quality of life of patients2,3. Despite its prevalence, there is a lack of understanding of the pathology of CSU and consequently, limited treatment options. Standard therapy with regular doses of non-sedating second-generation H1 antihistamines (H1AH) are ineffective for more than 50% of patients with CSU2.

Accumulating evidence suggests that the skin and brain are functionally connected4,5. For instance, the brain shares numerous mediators with skin through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis)4. Studies have shown that the HPA axis may be altered in stress-related skin diseases, resulting in the activation of mast cells6,7, which are the primary effector cells in CSU8.

The most common clinical manifestation of CSU is repeated itching and scratching. Studies suggest that the brain plays a key role in the itch-scratch cycle9. Functional brain imaging studies have identified brain regions associated with the itch-scratch cycle, such as the primary somatosensory cortex (SI), secondary somatosensory cortex (SII), primary motor cortex (MI), premotor cortex (PM), supplementary motor area (SMA), cerebellum, the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the striatum, and thalamus1014.

In recent years, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) has been applied to investigate the intrinsic functional organization of the brain1517. There are many resting-state fMRI data analysis methods, some of which focus on local connectivity and examine the properties of spontaneous local brain activity, such as the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), and others which focus on long-range connectivity among different brain regions, such as seed-based resting state functional connectivity18. As a reliable and reproducible data-driven method, ALFF can measure the total power of a given time course within a typical frequency range (e.g., 0.01–0.08 Hz), which has been proven to be a valuable index of regional spontaneous neuronal activity19,20. Disruptions in ALFF have been observed in several disorders such as chronic pain2124. In addition to brain function changes, previous studies have also found brain structure changes in patients with chronic itch. For instance, Papoiu et al. found gray matter density was significantly increased in the brain stem, hippocampus, amygdala, ventral striatum, and putamen in chronic itch patients with end-stage renal disease25.

In the present study, we combined local and long-range resting-state methods with voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis to explore the differences in resting state brain activity and brain structure between CSU patients and matched healthy controls (HCs). Many CSU patients suffer from itchy wheals, which generally occur at a specific and consistent time every day, usually during the evening or early morning26. To avoid itching intensity variation as a confound, all scans were applied while the CSU patients did not have any itching sensations. We hypothesized that CSU patients would have disrupted brain activity and related plasticity of the brain reward pathways, especially in the striatum.

Results

Demographic characteristics

Forty CSU patients (32 female and 8 male) completed the fMRI scan. Forty healthy individuals were matched by age and gender (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics between HCs and CSU group. Values are presented as mean ± SD.

HC (n = 40) CSU group (n = 40)
Gender (male/female) 8/32 8/32
Age (year) 42.6 ± 10.8 42.6 ± 10.8
UAS7 30.8 ± 6.2

ALFF results

Compared with healthy controls, CSU patients showed significant ALFF increases at the right striatum, including the ventral striatum and putamen (Fig. 1A; Table 2). No other significant regions were identified.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Significant differences of ALFF values in right ventral striatum/putamen between the CSU and HCs (CSU > HCs). (B) The ALFF values of this cluster in the CSU group were positively correlated with the UAS7 scores (r = 0.352, p = 0.026). (C) Increased gray matter volume in CSU compared with HCs in right ventral striatum (VStr) and putamen (Put).

Table 2.

Brain regions with significant differences in ALFF values among CSU and HCs.

contrast Brain Regions MINI coordinates Peak Z-value Number of Voxels in the cluster
X Y Z
CSU > HC right ventral striatum 12 3 0 3.88 130
right putamen 24 12 −6 3.46
HC > CSU None-

To further test the association between the ALFF values of the observed cluster and UAS7, we extracted the ALFF values (n = 40) from the right striatum cluster and performed a correlation analysis for CSU patients. The results showed that the ALFF values were positively associated with UAS7 (r = 0.352, p = 0.026) (Fig. 1B).

VBM results

Significant gray matter volume (GMV) increases were found in the CSU group compared to the healthy control group in the right putamen (cluster size 90, MNI peak coordinates: 30; 14; 6) and right ventral striatum (cluster size 222, MNI peak coordinates: 14; 6; −4) (Fig. 1C).

rs-FC results

To further investigate the network associated with the striatum, we used the right ventral striatum and putamen, which were identified by VBM analysis, as ROIs and performed a seed-based resting state functional connectivity (rs-FC) analysis.

We found that CSU patients demonstrated decreased rs-FC between the right ventral striatum and right occipital cortex and between the right putamen and left precentral gyrus (Table 3). There were no significant increases observed at the threshold we set.

Table 3.

Brain regions showing significant functional connectivity differences with the seed.

seed contrast Brain regions Cluster size (voxels) Peak z-score MNI coordinates
X Y Z
right ventral striatum HCs > CSU Right occipital cortex 463 4.28 40 −68 20
CSU > HCs None-
right putamen HCs > CSU Left precentral gyrus 270 3.97 −36 −12 66
CSU > HCs None-

Discussion

In this study, we investigated ALFF differences, gray matter volume, and seed based rs-FC between CSU patients and healthy controls. We found that CSU patients exhibited higher ALFF values in the right ventral striatum and putamen. These ALFF values were positively associated with clinical symptoms as measured by UAS7. In addition, significant gray matter volume (GMV) increases were found in the CSU group compared to the healthy group in the right putamen and ventral striatum. Furthermore, seed-based rs-FC analysis showed decreased rs-FC between the right ventral striatum and right occipital cortex and between the right putamen and left precentral gyrus. These findings may provide valuable insights into the neuropathology of chronic itch conditions.

The striatum is one of the nuclei in the subcortical basal ganglia and receives glutamatergic and dopaminergic inputs from different brain regions, as well as serving as the primary input to the rest of the basal ganglia nuclei27. It is composed of three nuclei: caudate, putamen, and ventral striatum, and each is associated with different functions, including reward, motivation, reinforcement and motor- and action-planning28.

In this study, we found increased ALFF and gray matter volume at the ventral striatum in CSU patients compared with HCs. The ventral striatum plays an important role in processing rewarding stimuli, reinforcing stimuli (e.g., food and water), and stimuli which are both rewarding and reinforcing (addictive drugs, sex, exercise and placebo response)29,30. Previous studies suggest that the ventral striatum is involved in the relief of itch by scratching31 and is selectively activated during emotional stimulation32,33. The most common clinical manifestation of CSU is repeated itchy wheals and scratching. Scratching an itch, a pleasurable experience, is correlated with the intensity of the itch34,35. This pleasurable experience is associated with reward regions36,37, which are activated by itch even when there is no scratching behavior38,39. Molecular mapping also showed an increased number of c-Fos neurons in the ventral striatum and putamen of mice that displayed contagious scratching40.

The putamen is a key region within the basal ganglia-thalamic circuit and is involved in action motivation and initiation, as well as in habitual and repetitive behaviors41,42. Previous studies have found that the putamen is closely related to the processing of the itch-scratch cycle. Significant activation of the putamen was found during the scratch process of patients with chronic itch43 and when an itch was produced by mediators (e.g. cowhage)44.

Interestingly, the activity of the putamen during an itch before scratching suggests that this brain region may also code the urge to scratch43,45. The putamen can be activated by sedating antihistamines, which may relieve itch by instigating patterns of brain activity similar to those induced by scratching an itch46. Thus, the ventral striatum and putamen seems to play an important role in the suppression of itch by the regulation of scratch.

We also found increased gray matter volume at the right ventral striatum and putamen in CSU patients compared with HCs. Although there have been very few studies on brain structure changes in chronic itch patients, an increase of gray matter density and volume in the striatum has been reported in chronic pain4750. The ventral striatum and putamen may be involved in the anticipation of itch, as well as in itch relief. The observed structural changes may be due to the altered function of the ventral striatum and putamen in CSU and compensatory responses to itch and to altered movement control.

To further explore the network involved in the right striatum, we used the ventral striatum and putamen as seeds and performed a resting state functional connectivity analysis. We found that CSU patients were associated with decreased rs-FC relative to HCs between the right putamen and left precentral gyrus. The precentral gyrus is the site of the primary motor cortex, which is the primary region of the motor system and works in association with other brain areas to plan and execute scratching movements51. Studies suggest that the primary motor cortex is related to itch processing1014. The primary motor cortex and reward system are associated with motor control and motivational aspects of behavior in the itch-scratch cycle52. Scratching in chronic itch patients induces a more robust activation of motor-related regions and of the reward system52. The primary motor cortex projects to a portion of the striatum (mostly putamen), which in turn projects back to motor areas of the cortex by way of the ventral anterior and ventral lateral (VA/VL) nuclei of the thalamus53,54. We thus speculate that the decreased connectivity between the putamen and primary motor cortex may reflect a disrupted motivation-motor process in chronic itch patients.

We also found that CSU is associated with decreased rs-FC relative to HCs between the right ventral striatum and right occipital cortex. The occipital cortex contains most of the anatomical regions of the visual cortex55. A study of mice found that scratching behavior can be induced not only by mere observation of conspecific scratching in a video, but also by artificially stimulating the suprachiasmatic nucleus GRPR neurons, which suggests that visual-related areas may constitute the neural circuits for itch40. Further study is needed to explore the role of occipital cortex in chronic itch.

Conclusions

Using multiple-modality brain imaging tools, we found functional, structural and resting state functional connectivity alterations of the right ventral striatum and putamen in patients with CSU. Our results suggest that CSU may be associated with disrupted reward, motivation, and motor processing.

Methods

This research protocol has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Guang’anmen Hospital affiliated with the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. The experiment was performed in accordance with approved guidelines. All subjects signed the written informed consent before the study began.

Subjects

CSU Patients

Forty patients were recruited from the outpatient clinic in the department of dermatology at Guang’anmen Hospital. Patients with a documented history of CSU, characterized by transient, itchy wheals of unknown etiology, occurring regularly from 6 weeks or more before consent acquisition were enrolled in the study. All patients received non-sedation H1-antihistamines (such as Loratadine, Desloratadine, Fexofenadine, Cetirizine dihydrochloride) before enrollment.

Inclusion criteria were: 18 to 60 years old; a UAS756 >14; right handed; have a clear asymptomatic stage more than three hours during the day without non-sedating H1-antihistamine treatment.

Exclusion criteria were: use of sedating antihistamines (such as Alimemazine, Chlorphenamine, Clemastine, Cyproheptadine, Hydroxyzine, Ketotifen, Promethazine), corticosteroids, biologics, psychotropic drugs, or opioids in the past 3 months; chronic pain; pregnant or lactating women; current or history of psychiatric or neurological diseases, head trauma, or loss of consciousness; claustrophobia; metal implants; other skin diseases.

Healthy controls (HCs)

Forty right-handed HCs were gender and age matched with CSU patients.

Clinical Outcome assessment

Clinical symptoms were assessed using the UAS757 and acquired about three days before the fMRI scan.

Magnetic resonance imaging data acquisition

Patients who were taking non-sedating antihistamines discontinued them three days prior to the scan. During the scan, patients did not have any itching or wheals.

Functional MRI was conducted on a 3.0 T Siemens MAGNETOM Skyra MRI system equipped with a standard twenty-channel head coil. Foam pads were used to restrict head motion. T2WI data was acquired to exclude the lesion and abnormality. T1-weighted high resolution structural images were acquired with the three dimensional fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence (TR 5000 ms, TE 2.98 ms, matrix 256 × 256, FOV 256 × 240 mm, FA 1 = 4°, slice thickness 1 mm, gap 0 mm, 176 slices). BOLD fMRI images encompassing the whole brain were collected with the gradient echo EPI sequence (TR 2500 ms, TE 30 ms, matrix 70 × 70, FOV 210 × 210 mm, FA = 90°, slice thickness 3 mm, gap 0 mm, 43 slices, paralleled by AC-PC line). During the 369 second (dummy scan for the first 9 seconds) resting state fMRI scan, subjects were asked to lie still with their eyes closed.

Statistical analysis

Behavioral data

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The mean ± SD were calculated for normally distributed continuous variables.

Data preprocessing and Calculation of ALFF

Data preprocessing and calculation of ALFF was performed using DPARSF software of Dpabi V2.3 (a toolbox for Data Processing and Analysis of brain imaging; http://rfmri.org/dpabi)58, which is based on Statistical Parametric Mapping 12(SPM12) and the Resting-state fMRI Data Analysis Toolkit (http://www.restfmri.net)59 in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).

We first checked the scanning image quality for each participant and transformed EPI DICOM to NIFTI. We removed the first 4 time points and then functional slice-timing corrected, spatially realigned, segmented the structural image into gray matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), removed the friston 24 head motion parameters and CSF signals as regressors, and normalized the images using standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) templates with a resolution of 3 × 3 × 3 mm. Subjects with head movements exceeding 2 mm on any axis or with head rotation greater than 2° were excluded and smoothed with a Gaussian kernel of 8-mm full-width at half maximum (FWHM). Lastly, the time series for each voxel was filtered (bandpass, 0.01–0.08 Hz) to remove the effects of very-low-frequency drift and high frequency noise.

ALFF calculations were based on previous studies60. For a given voxel, a fast Fourier transform (FFT) (parameters: taper percent = 0, FFT length = shortest) was used to convert the filtered time series to a frequency domain to obtain the power spectrum. The power spectrum was then square-rooted and averaged across 0.01–0.08 Hz at each voxel, which was deemed as the ALFF. Ultimately, we obtained each participant’s Z-standardized ALFF map for the following statistical analysis.

SPM12 was used to examine group differences. Two-sample t-tests were performed between HCs and CSU patients. A threshold of voxel-wise p < 0.005 uncorrected and p < 0.05 cluster-level family-wise error rate (FWE) corrected was applied for ALFF analysis.

Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis

VBM analyses were carried out in SPM12. Similar to our previous studies61, the T1 images were first segmented into grey matter (GM), white matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and normalized using the high dimensional DARTEL algorithm62. To reduce variability between the subjects, we created a group specific template. Then, the template was used to normalize the images into the standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space with an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 8 mm full-width at half maximum. Group analysis was applied using two sample t-tests. An absolute threshold of 0.1 was used for masking61,63. Total intracranial volume was obtained by summing up the overall volumes of GM, white matter, and CSF.

In this study, we only focused on the VBM changes in the right ventral striatum / putamen (region of interest) as revealed by ALFF analysis. Small volume correction with a threshold of voxel-wise p < 0.005 (uncorrected) and p < 0.05 FWE corrected at cluster level was applied.

Data preprocessing and Calculation of Seed-based Function connectivity

Data preprocessing and calculations of functional connectivity were all carried out using the CONN-fMRI Functional Connectivity toolbox v17.c64 (http://www.nitrc.org/projects/conn), which is based on SPM12 in MATLAB. We used the default preprocessing pipeline for volume-based analysis (direct normalization to MNI-space). The specific steps are as follows: functional realignment and unwarped; functionally centered to coordinates; functional slice-timing corrected; structural center to coordinates; structural segmentation and normalization; functional normalization; functional outlier detection (ART-based identification of outlier scans for scrubbing); functional smoothing with an 8-mm FWHM. Band-pass filtering was performed using the low frequency band (0.01–0.08 Hz).

Seeds were chosen based on the VBM results (right ventral striatum and right putamen), which indicate the overlap area in both ALFF and VBM analysis. Functional connectivity measures were computed between each seed and every other voxel in the brain. The residual BOLD time course was extracted from a given seed and then its first-level correlation map was estimated by computing Pearson’s correlation coefficients between that time course and the time courses of all other voxels in the brain. Correlation coefficients were transformed into Fisher’s ‘Z’-scores to increase normality and allow for improved second-level General Linear Model analyses. Seed-to-voxel functional connectivity was estimated for each subject.

SPM12 was used to examine group differences. Two-sample t-tests were performed between HCs and CSU. A threshold of voxel-wise p < 0.005 uncorrected and cluster-level p ≤ 0.05 FWE corrected was applied for rs-FC data analysis.

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public Welfare Research Institutes, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (ZZ0908054), the foundation of Guang’anmen Hospital (2015s323), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant No. 2017M611121). Jian Kong is supported by R01AT006364, R01AT008563, R61AT009310, R21AT008707 and P01 AT006663 (NIH/NCCIH).

Author Contributions

Y.M.W. performed the experimental design, analyzed the data and made the manuscript preparation; J.K., J.L., analyzed the data and made the manuscript preparation; J.L.F., B.N.C., P.S., performed the experimental design and collected the data; C.L. made the manuscript preparation; Y.B., C.C.X., X.D., Z.F.Y., Y.H.Y., Q.K., collected the data; R.R.S., analyzed the data. All authors contributed to drafting the manuscript and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

J.K. has a disclosure to report (holding equity in a startup company (MNT) and a pending patent to develop a new neuromodulation device) but declares no conflict of interest. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Yuming Wang, Jiliang Fang, Bingnan Cui and Jiao Liu contributed equally to this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yuming Wang, Email: wangyumingmmm@163.com.

Jian Kong, Email: kongj@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.

References

  • 1.Zuberbier T, et al. The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria: The 2013 revision and update. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014;69:868–887. doi: 10.1111/all.12313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maurer M, et al. Unmet clinical needs in chronic spontaneous urticaria. A GA2LEN task force report. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2011;66:317–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baiardini I, et al. Quality of life and patients’ satisfaction in chronic urticaria and respiratory allergy. Allergy. 2003;58:621–3. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Slominski AT, et al. Sensing the environment: Regulation of localand global homeostasis by the skin’s neuroendocrine system. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 2012;212:1–115. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19683-6_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mueller SM, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in dermatology: The skin, the brain and the invisible. Experimental Dermatology. 2017;26:845–853. doi: 10.1111/exd.13305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim JE, Cho BK, Cho DH, Park HJ. Expression of Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in common skin diseases:Evidence of its association with stress-related Disease Activity. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. 2013;93:387–393. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arck P, Paus R. From the brain-skin connection: The neuroendocrine-immune misalliance of stress and itch. Neuro Immuno Modulation. 2007;13:347–356. doi: 10.1159/000104863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Puxeddu, I., Pratesi, F., Ribatti, D. & Migliorini, P. Mediators of Inflammation and Angiogenesis in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Are They Potential Biomarkers of the Disease? Mediators of Inflammation2017 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Mochizuki H, Kakigi R. Itch and brain. Journal of Dermatology. 2015;42:761–767. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.12956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mochizuki H, Kakigi R. Central mechanisms of itch. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015;126:1650–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hsieh JC, et al. Urge to scratch represented in the human cerebral cortex during itch. J. Neurophysiol. 1994;72:3004–8. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.6.3004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mochizuki H, et al. Imaging of central itch modulation in the human brain using positron emission tomography. Pain. 2003;105:339–346. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00249-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Drzezga A, et al. Central activation by histamine-induced itch: Analogies to pain processing: A correlational analysis of O-15 H2O positron emission tomography studies. Pain. 2001;92:295–305. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00271-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leknes SG, et al. Itch and motivation to scratch: an investigation of the central and peripheral correlates of allergen- and histamine-induced itch in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:415–422. doi: 10.1152/jn.00070.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Biswal BB. Resting state fMRI: A personal history. NeuroImage. 2012;62:938–944. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fox PT, et al. BrainMap taxonomy of experimental design: Description and evaluation. in. Human Brain Mapping. 2005;25:185–198. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Snyder AZ, Raichle ME. A brief history of the resting state: The Washington University perspective. NeuroImage. 2012;62:902–910. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fox MD, Raichle ME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:700–711. doi: 10.1038/nrn2201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zang, et al. Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Dev. 2007;29:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yan CG, Craddock RC, Zuo XN, Zang YF, Milham MP. Standardizing the intrinsic brain: Towards robust measurement of inter-individual variation in 1000 functional connectomes. Neuroimage. 2013;80:246–262. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xue T, et al. Alterations of regional spontaneous neuronal activity and corresponding brain circuit changes during resting state in migraine without aura. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:1051–1058. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qi R, et al. Intrinsic brain abnormalities in irritable bowel syndrome and effect of anxiety and depression. Brain Imaging Behav. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9478-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang J-J, et al. Amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and fractional ALFF in migraine patients: a resting-state functional MRI study. Clin. Radiol. 2016;71:558–64. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li Z, et al. Acupuncture modulates the abnormal brainstem activity in migraine without aura patients. NeuroImage Clin. 2017;15:367–375. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Papoiu ADP, et al. Voxel-based morphometry and arterial spin labeling fMRI reveal neuropathic and neuroplastic features of brain processing of itch in end-stage renal disease. J. Neurophysiol. 2014;112:1729–1738. doi: 10.1152/jn.00827.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Maurer M, Ortonne JP, Zuberbier T. Chronic urticaria: An internet survey of health behaviours, symptom patterns and treatment needs in European adult patients. Br. J. Dermatol. 2009;160:633–641. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08920.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Middleton FA. Basal-ganglia ‘Projections’ to the Prefrontal Cortex of the Primate. Cereb. Cortex. 2002;12:926–935. doi: 10.1093/cercor/12.9.926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Haber SN. The primate basal ganglia: Parallel and integrative networks. in. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy. 2003;26:317–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2003.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olsen CM. Natural rewards, neuroplasticity, and non-drug addictions. Neuropharmacology. 2011;61:1109–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yu R, et al. Placebo analgesia and reward processing: Integrating genetics, personality, and intrinsic brain activity. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014;35:4583–4593. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Papoiu ADP, Kraft RA, Coghill RC, Yosipovitch G. Butorphanol suppression of histamine itch is mediated by nucleus accumbens and septal nuclei: A pharmacological fMRI study. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2015;135:560–568. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Costa VD, Lang PJ, Sabatinelli D, Versace F, Bradley MM. Emotional imagery: Assessing pleasure and arousal in the brain’s reward circuitry. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010;31:1446–1457. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sabatinelli D, Bradley MM, Lang PJ, Costa VD, Versace F. Pleasure rather than salience activates human nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2007;98:1374–9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00230.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.O’Neill JL, Chan YH, Rapp SR, Yosipovitch G. Differences in itch characteristics between psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients: Results of a web-based questionnaire. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2011;91:537–540. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bin Saif GA, et al. The pleasurability of scratching an itch: A psychophysical and topographical assessment. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012;166:981–985. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10826.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Papoiu, A. D. P. et al. Brain’s reward circuits mediate itch relief. A functional MRI study of active scratching. PLoS One8 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Mochizuki, H. et al. The cerebral representation of scratching-induced pleasantness. J. Neurophysiol. 488–498, 10.1152/jn.00374.2013 (2013) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Vierow V, Forster C, Vogelgsang R, Dörfler A, Handwerker HO. Cerebral networks linked to itch-related sensations induced by histamine and capsaicin. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2015;95:645–652. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kleyn CE, McKie S, Ross A, Elliott R, Griffiths CE. A temporal analysis of the central neural processing of itch. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:994–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yu Y-Q, et al. Molecular and neural basis of contagious itch behavior in mice. Science (80-.). 2017;355:216–217. doi: 10.1126/science.aak9748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Graybiel AM. Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2008;31:359–387. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Desbordes G, et al. Evoked itch perception is associated with changes in functional brain connectivity. NeuroImage Clin. 2015;7:213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vierow V, et al. Cerebral representation of the relief of itch by scratching. J. Neurophysiol. 2009;102:3216–24. doi: 10.1152/jn.00207.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Papoiu ADP, Coghill RC, Kraft RA, Wang H, Yosipovitch G. A tale of two itches. Common features and notable differences in brain activation evoked by cowhage and histamine induced itch. Neuroimage. 2012;59:3611–3623. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Napadow V, et al. The brain circuitry mediating antipruritic effects of acupuncture. Cereb. Cortex. 2014;24:873–882. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kim HJ, Park JB, Lee JH, Kim IH. How stress triggers Itch: A preliminary study of the mechanism of stress-induced pruritus using fMRI. Int. J. Dermatol. 2016;55:434–442. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schmidt-Wilcke T, et al. Striatal grey matter increase in patients suffering from fibromyalgia–a voxel-based morphometry study. Pain. 2007;132(Suppl):S109–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schmidt-Wilcke T, et al. Affective components and intensity of pain correlate with structural differences in gray matter in chronic back pain patients. Pain. 2006;125:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schweinhardt P, Kuchinad A, Pukall CF, Bushnell MC. Increased gray matter density in young women with chronic vulvar pain. Pain. 2008;140:411–419. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wartolowska K, et al. Structural changes of the brain in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:371–379. doi: 10.1002/art.33326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Valet M, et al. Cerebral processing of histamine-induced itch using short-term alternating temperature modulation–an FMRI study. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008;128:426–33. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mochizuki H, et al. Scratching Induces Overactivity in Motor-Related Regions and Reward System in Chronic Itch Patients. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2015;135:2814–2823. doi: 10.1038/jid.2015.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Künzle H. Bilateral projections from precentral motor cortex to the putamen and other parts of the basal ganglia. An autoradiographic study in Macaca fascicularis. Brain Res. 1975;88:195–209. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90384-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Shipp S. The functional logic of corticostriatal connections. Brain Structure and Function. 2017;222:669–706. doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1250-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Quintero GC. Advances in cortical modulation of pain. Journal of Pain Research. 2013;6:713–725. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S45958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Młynek A, et al. How to assess disease activity in patients with chronic urticaria? Allergy. 2008;63:777–780. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zuberbier T, et al. EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: Definition, classification and diagnosis of urticaria. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009;64:1417–1426. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yan CG, Wang X, Di, Zuo XN, Zang YF. DPABI: Data Processing & Analysis for (Resting-State) Brain Imaging. Neuroinformatics. 2016;14:339–351. doi: 10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Song X-W, et al. REST: A Toolkit for Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Processing. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang H, et al. Amplitude of low frequency fluctuation within visual areas revealed by resting-state functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2007;36:144–152. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tao, J. et al. Ta Chi Chuanand Baduanjinincrease grey matter volume in older adults: a brain imaging study. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 62.Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007;38:95–113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kalmady SV, et al. Relationship between Interleukin-6 gene polymorphism and hippocampal volume in antipsychotic-naive schizophrenia: evidence for differential susceptibility? PLoS One. 2014;9:e96021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks. Brain Connect. 2012;2:125–141. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES