Abstract
Objective
Genetic and environmental factors are important in the development of the multiple sclerosis (MS). Vitamin D shows its effects on the immune system with the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in the nucleus. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the VDR gene can lead to alterations in vitamin D functions and metabolism.Taq I, Apa I, Fok I and Bsm I polymorphisms and MS associations have been investigated in many studies. VDR gene polymorphism has not been previously studied in patients with familial MS.
Aim
We aimed to investigate the relationship between familial MS patients present in Turkish population and VDR genotypes Taq I, Apa I and Fok I polymorphisms.
Methods
29 patients with a family history of MS and 120 healthy control subjects were included in the present study. We studied present VDR genotypes Taq I, Apa I and Fok I polymorphisms.
Results
We observed a significant difference between controls and patient group only in Taq I polymorphism (p: 0.025). Homozygousity of G allele was not seen in the patients whereas in controls frequency of that genotype was p:0.208. When gender was considered males show significant difference for GG genotype. There were no significant association for the Apa I and Fok I polymorphisms.
Conclusion
Although our findings suggest association between VDR Taq I polymorphism and the familial MS, additional studies are needed to establish detailed relationships.
Keywords: Multiple Sclerosis, Familial Multiple Sclerosis, Vitamin D, Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms
1. INTRODUCTION
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) in young adults (1). Although the etiology of the disease remains poorly understood, it is thought that both autoimmune and infectious mechanisms may play a role. This idea is supported by data from studies indicating that both genetic and environmental factors are involved in disease development (2). Although the factors triggering MS remain unknown, auto-reactive T cells and antibodies against CNS are believed to play major pathogenic roles in the development of inflammation and tissue damage. Similar mechanisms are implicated in the progression of neurological disability and functional deficits (1, 2).
Vitamin D is a steroid hormone that exerts regulatory and functional effects in humans (3). Vitamin D plays a regulatory role within the immune system by reducing the presentation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)II by monocytes and T cells, and stimulating the proliferation of B cells, differentiation of plasma cells, release of immunoglobulin E and M, production of memory B cells, and apoptosis of active B cells. Vitamin D also reduces T cell proliferation and pro-inflammatory cytokine release. The low levels of vitamin D in patients with MS suggest that vitamin D modulates the Th1-mediated immune response (3, 4).
Vitamin D exerts effects on the immune system by binding to the nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR). Specific variants of the VDR gene are associated with alterations in vitamin D function and metabolism (5). The relationship between MS and VDR polymorphisms has been investigated in many studies (6-13). In 2005, an Australian study explored the relationships between MS and the Taq I, Apa I, and Fok I polymorphisms (14). A similar study was conducted in Greece in 2011 (13). In addition, studies have been performed in Tunisia (15), Kuwait (16), Southeast Iran (17), and Slovakia (18). Usually, associations between MS and the Taq I, Apa I, Fok I, and Bsm I polymorphisms are investigated; these polymorphisms are the most common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the VDR gene. The frequencies of these polymorphisms have not been previously studied in patients with familial MS in our population. We therefore explored the relationship between familial MS in our country and the VDR Taq I (rs731236), Apa I (rs7975232), and Fok I (rs2228570) polymorphisms.
In this study we aimed to study the presence of association between familial MS and three polymorphisms of VDR gene in a Turkish population living in Malatya Turkey.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
This study was performed in the Department of Neurology of Medical School and the Molecular Biology and Genetics Department of Inonu University. Twenty-nine patients with a family history of MS and 120 healthy controls were enrolled. MS patients aged 18-60 years, with no other known disease, were included. The controls were healthy Turkish volunteers in the same age group. There was no relationship between the patients and the control subjects. The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by our local ethics committee. All participants were fully informed and gave written consent prior to study commencement.
DNA isolation and genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood stored with an anticoagulant using a commercial kit (PureLink® Genomic DNA Mini Kit; Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. We coded all blood and DNA samples to ensure anonymity. All samples were genotyped using the TaqMan® SNP Assay (Applied Biosystems): C_12060045_20 for rs2228570, C_2404008_10 for rs731236, and C_28977635_10 for rs7975232. We employed a StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System [Applied Biosystems, USA].
Statistical analysis
SPSS software version 17.0 (Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analyses. Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) was explored using Pearson’s goodness-of-fit chi-square test. The significance level for deviation from HWE was set at p-value less than 0.01 (19). Allele and genotype frequencies are shown as counts with percentages. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Pearson’s, exact, and continuity-corrected chi-square tests were used to make comparisons. As the numerical data were not normally distributed, medians were defined by reference to the minimum and maximum values, and the Kruskal - Wallis test was used to compare the medians.
3. RESULTS
Twenty-nine patients with MS with family histories of the disease and 120 healthy individuals were enrolled in this study. Of the 29 patients, 21 were females and 8 were males. The control group included 61 females and 59 males. The demographic and clinical data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients and controls. *RRMS: Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. *PPMS: Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. *SPMS: Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.
Patients (n = 29) | Controls (n = 120) | |
---|---|---|
Age (years) | 33.7 ± 10.7 | 33.1 ± 8.5 |
Gender (male/female, n) | 8/21 | 59/61 |
Duration of disease (years) | 7.6 ± 5.6 | |
MS subtype (n) | *RRMS, 23 *PPMS, 1 *SPMS, 5 |
Tables 2 shows the allele and genotype frequencies of the Taq I (rs731236), Fok I (rs2228570), and Apa I (rs7975232) polymorphisms in cases and controls. The frequency of only the Taq I polymorphism differed significantly between the patient and control groups (p = 0.025). Homozygosity of GG was absent in patients but occurred at a frequency of 0.208 in controls. The other two polymorphisms were not significantly associated with in our group of familial MS patients from Malatya.
Table 2. VDR Polymorphisms genotypes and alleles frequencies.
Taq I | AA | AG | GG | p | Hardy–Weinberg p | A | G | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||||
Controls | 31 (43.1) | 26 (36.1) | 15 (20.8) | 0.025 | 0.041 | 88 (61.1) | 56 (38.9) | 0.149 |
Patients | 13 (46.4) | 15 (53.6) | 0 (0) | 0.053 | 41 (73.2) | 15 (26.8) | ||
Fok I | AA | AG | GG | p | Hardy–Weinberg p | A | G | p |
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||||
Controls | 8 (7) | 34 (29.8) | 72 (63.2) | 0.422 | 0.168 | 50 (21.9) | 178 (78.1) | 0.233 |
Patients | 1 (3.4) | 6 (20.7) | 22 (75.9 | 0.483 | 8 (13.8) | 50 (86.2) | ||
Apa I | AA | AC | CC | p | Hardy–Weinberg p | A | C | p |
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||||
Controls | 28 (34.6) | 37 (45.7) | 16 (19.8) | 0.956 | 0.553 | 93 (57.4) | 69 (42.6) | 0.963 |
Patients | 8 (30.8) | 13 (50) | 5 (19.2) | 0.945 | 29 (55.8) | 23 (44.2) |
4. DISCUSSION
Multiple Sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating disease of the CNS and is one of the most common causes of disability in young and middle-aged adults (20). Genetic and environmental factors, especially T cell-mediated autoimmunity, are thought to play roles in MS pathogenesis (2). Vitamin D is a potential modulator of immune system; therefore, many studies have explored vitamin D status in patients with MS (21). Vitamin D plays regulatory and functional roles in humans. Vitamin D binds to VDR and the membrane-associated fast-response steroid-binding receptor (MARRS). Certain polymorphisms of the VDR gene modify the function and metabolism of vitamin D (22). Many studies have explored the effects of VDR polymorphisms in various ethnic groups. Associations between Taq I, Apa I, Fok I, and Bsm I polymorphisms and MS, are usually examined; these polymorphisms are the most commonly studied SNPs in the VDR gene. These polymorphisms have not previously been studied in patients with familial MS. We evaluated the frequencies of Taq I, Apa I, and Fok I polymorphisms in patients with familial MS in our region.
Several studies focused on these three SNPs in their cohorts. An Australian case-control study (104 patients and 104 controls) found significant difference between groups in the frequencies of the Taq I and Apa I polymorphisms; the latter polymorphism predisposed patients to primary and secondary progressive MS (14). Cox et al., found that Taq I polymorphism increased the risk of MS in the UK (12). In another study involving 60 patients with RRMS and 114 controls in Tunisia, the T allele of the Taq I polymorphism was found to protect against the risk of MS in an age- and gender-specific manner. Thus, VDR status may affect the risk of MS. However, no significant association was evident between the Apa I polymorphism and MS (15).
In a Canadian case-control study allele or genotype frequencies of the Taq I and Apa I polymorphisms did not differ (23). Similarly, the frequencies of the genotypes or alleles of Taq I polymorphism showed no difference in a Greek study (13). The latter study showed that the bone mineral densities of the hip and lumbar vertebrae were lower in patients with MS than in controls. No significant association was apparent between low bone mineral density and the Taq I polymorphism (13).
Dickinson et al. studied 136 patients and 235 controls. No relationship was evident between any of the Cdx-2, Fok I, or Taq I polymorphisms and MS. However, low-level winter sun exposure during childhood was associated with the Cdx-2 polymorphism and MS development. The same study found a between the G allele and a reduced MS risk in patients exposed to the sun for fewer than 2 h/day, suggesting that the association between VDR gene polymorphisms and MS may be attributable to historical sunlight exposure (10).
Simon et al. studied 214 patients and 428 controls in the United Kingdom. Patients with the Fok I polymorphism and low vitamin D intake were at high risk of MS development. No association was evident between VDR SNPs (Apa I, Taq I, Bsm I, and Fok I) and MS (11).
Cierny et al., working in Slovakia, found that the Fok I polymorphism was more common in female patients with MS (18). In the present study, no significant gender difference was observed.
In the present study we analysed if there is an association between three SNPs located in VDR gene and familial MS. We set our hypothesis as “there is no significant difference in genotypes and allele frequencies between familial MS patients and healthy controls for three VDR SNPs we have screened in this study.”
Our results showed that, the frequency of the Taq I polymorphism differed significantly between controls and patients (p = 0.025). In addition, the Taq I polymorphism analysis suggested that the GG genotype may protect against the familial MS and this may be a positive marker for familial MS disease. The frequency of the Apa I and Fok I polymorphisms did not differ significantly between the two groups. Since there were a few patients in the subgroups we couldn’t analyze our data by MS subtype. Neither Australian (14) nor our study found significant difference between case and control groups for Fok I polymorphism.
The incidence of familial MS in the community is low (4% in first-degree relatives of patients with MS) (24); we enrolled only 29 patients with familial MS. The lack of associations between the Fok I and Apa I polymorphisms and MS may indicate that these polymorphisms in this patient group are in fact not associated with the disease, or that our patient number was too small. Our work is preliminary in nature; additional studies with more patients with a family history of MS are needed to obtain statistically significant results.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Coordination Unit for Scientific Research Projects.
Author contrubition
FEY and OK conceived and wrote the initial study proposal and contributed substantially to conception and design of the research study. CA and MS made substantial contributions to acquisition of data. FEY, OK and CA performed data analysis and drafted the manuscript. FEY, OK, CA, and MS participated in results interpretation and editing of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sioka C, Kyritsis AP, Fotopoulos A. Multiple sclerosis, osteoporosis, and vitamin D. J Neurol Sci. 2009;287:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McFarland HF, Martin R. Multiple sclerosis a complicated picture of autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:913–9. doi: 10.1038/ni1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Holick MF. Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(6):1678–88. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1678S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zella JB, DeLuca HF. Vitamin D and autoimmune diabetes. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(2):216–22. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ates O, Dolek B, Dalyan L, Musellim B, Ongen G, Topal-Sarikaya A. The association between Bsm I variant of vitamin D receptor gene and susceptibility to tuberculosis. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38:2633–36. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0404-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smolders J, Damoiseaux J, et al. Association study on two vitamin D metabolites in multiple sclerosis. Ann Y Acad Sci. 2009;1173:515–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04656.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harada K, Nakanuma Y. Biliary innate immunity and cholangiopathy. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:430–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00247.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fukazawa, et al. Associatıon of vitamin D receptor polymorphism with multiple sclerosis in Japanese. J Neurol Sci. 1999;166:47–52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lotti, et al. Variatıon in the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with multiple sclerosis in an Australian population. J. Neurogenetics. 2005;19:25–38. doi: 10.1080/01677060590949692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dickinson JL, Perera DI, et al. Past environmental sun exposure and risk of multiple sclerosis; a role for the Cdx-2 vitamin D receptor variant in this interaction. Multiple Scler. 2009;15(5):563–70. doi: 10.1177/1352458509102459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Simon KC, Munger KL, et al. Polymorphisms in vitamin D metabolism-related genes and risk of multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler. 2010;16(2):133–8. doi: 10.1177/1352458509355069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cox MB, Ban M, et al. Potential association of vitamin D receptor polymorphism Taq 1 with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler. 2012;18(1):16–22. doi: 10.1177/1352458511415562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sioka C, Papakonstantinou S, Markoula S, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in multiple sclerosis patients in northwest Greece. Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine. 2011;3:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-10-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tajouri L, Ovcaric M, Curtain R, Johnson MP. Variation in the Vitamin D receptor gene is associated with multiple sclerosis in an Australian population. J Neurogenet. 2005;19:25–38. doi: 10.1080/01677060590949692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ben W, Chebel S, Frih Ayed M, Aounit M, Boukadida J. Age- and gender-specific effects of VDR gene polymorphisms and risk of the development of multiple sclerosis in Tunisians: a preliminary study. International Journal of Immunogenetics. 2015;42:174–81. doi: 10.1111/iji.12197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Al-Temaimi R, Al-Enezi A, Al-Serri A, Al-Roughani R, Al-Mulla F. The association of Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms with multiple sclerosis in a case-control study from Kuwait. PLos One. 2015;10(11):e0142265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Narooie-Nejad M, Moossavi M, Torkamanzehi A, Moghtaderi A. Positive Association of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Variations with Multiple Sclerosis in South East Iranian Population. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:427519. doi: 10.1155/2015/427519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cierny D, Michalik J, Kurca E, Dobrota D, Lehotsky J. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism in association with multiple sclerosis risk and disability progression in Slovaks. Neurological Research. 2015;37(4):301–8. doi: 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lu CL, Wang YC, Chen JY, Lai IC, Liou YJ. Support for the involvement of the ERBB4 gene in schizophrenia: a genetic association analysis. Neurosci Lett. 2010;481(2):120–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kidd PM. Multiple sclerosis an autoimmune inflammatory disease: prospects for its integrative management. Altern Med Rev. 2001;6:540–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sahraian MA, Pakdaman H, Harandi AA. Is it time to revise the classification of geographical distribution of multiple sclerosis? Iran J Neurol. 2012;11(2):77–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fernandes de Abreu DA, Eyles D, Feron F. Vitamin D a neuroimmunomodulator: implications for neurodegenerative and autoimmune disease. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34:265–77. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Steckley, et al. Genetic analysis of vitamin D related genes in Canadian multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2000;54:729–32. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.3.729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sadovnick AD, Baird PA. Multiple sclerosis: Updated risks for relatives. Am J Med Gen. 1988;29:533–41. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320290310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]