Skip to main content
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2017 Dec 18;9(3):3704–3726. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23364

Integrating the dysregulated inflammasome-based molecular functionome in the malignant transformation of endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma

Chia-Ming Chang 1,2, Mong-Lien Wang 1,3, Kai-Hsi Lu 4, Yi-Ping Yang 3, Chi-Mou Juang 1,2, Peng-Hui Wang 1,2,5, Ren-Jun Hsu 6,7, Mu-Hsien Yu 8, Cheng-Chang Chang 8
PMCID: PMC5790494  PMID: 29423077

Abstract

The coexistence of endometriosis (ES) with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) or endometrioid carcinoma (EC) suggested that malignant transformation of ES leads to endometriosis associated ovarian carcinoma (EAOC). However, there is still lack of an integrating data analysis of the accumulated experimental data to provide the evidence supporting the hypothesis of EAOC transformation. Herein we used a function-based analytic model with the publicly available microarray datasets to investigate the expression profiling between ES, CCC, and EC. We analyzed the functional regularity pattern of the three type of samples and hierarchically clustered the gene sets to identify key mechanisms regulating the malignant transformation of EAOC. We identified a list of 18 genes (NLRP3, AIM2, PYCARD, NAIP, Caspase-4, Caspase-7, Caspase-8, TLR1, TLR7, TOLLIP, NFKBIA, TNF, TNFAIP3, INFGR2, P2RX7, IL-1B, IL1RL1, IL-18) closely related to inflammasome complex, indicating an important role of inflammation/immunity in EAOC transformation. We next explore the association between these target genes and patient survival using Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and found significant correlation between the expression levels of the target genes and the progression-free survival. Interestingly, high expression levels of AIM2 and NLRP3, initiating proteins of inflammasomes, were significantly correlated with poor progression-free survival. Immunohistochemistry staining confirmed a correlation between high AIM2 and high Ki-67 in clinical EAOC samples, supporting its role in disease progression. Collectively, we established a bioinformatic platform of gene-set integrative molecular functionome to dissect the pathogenic pathways of EAOC, and demonstrated a key role of dysregulated inflammasome in modulating the malignant transformation of EAOC.

Keywords: endometriosis, ovarian carcinoma, inflammasome, gene-set integrative analysis, gene expression microarray

INTRODUCTION

Epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOCs) are composed of a group of heterogeneous subtypes classified by their histology and the degree of epithelial proliferation and invasion [1]. Among these subtypes, clear cells carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC) share many similarities in their tumor behavior, clinical features, and pathology. Endometriosis (ES) is found in 15%-20% of CCC and EC, and is associated with 2-3 fold increase of EOC incidence [2] [3]. The atypical ES, characterized by large nuclei and increased nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, composes 8% of ES [4] and is found in 36% and 23% in CCC and EC, respectively [5]. Atypical ES was shown direct continuity with CCC and EC and is considered to be a precancerous transformation process of CCC and EC [6]. These clinical observations indicate a close relationship between ES and CCC/EC, and support the hypothesis of endometriosis associated ovarian carcinoma (EAOC). Recent genomic studies have greatly increased our understanding of the molecular landscape of EOC [7] [8]. However, the molecular pathogenesis involving in the malignant transformation from ES to EAOC is still unclear.

The Sampson’s theory of retrograde menstruation is the most widely accepted theory on the pathogenesis of ES [9]. However, there exists a paradox: although retrograde menstruation is widely encountered among reproductive women, the incidence of ES is relatively uncommon compared with the manifestation of retrograde menstruation experienced by most of the women in the same group [10]. One hypothesis is that in comparison to women without ES, the women that develop ES have a defective immune system unable to recognize the endometrial fragments within the pelvic cavity. Inflammatory responses play key roles at different stages of tumor development, including initiation, promotion, malignant conversion, invasion, and metastasis. Inflammation also disturbs immune surveillance and tumor responses to therapy. Immune cells that infiltrate tumors involve in a dynamic crosstalk with cancer cells and some of the molecular consequences that mediate this dialog have been identified [11].

The Gene Ontology (GO) [2] is the primary tool to annotate the gene products and enable the functional interpretation of the genomic data. It defines relatively comprehensive human functionome like biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components. This gene set regularity (GSR) model has been successfully utilized to demonstrate the dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis [12], and to quantify the function deterioration of the FIGO staging I to IV for serous ovarian carcinoma [13]. In this study, we investigated the dysregulated functions involving in the malignant transformation from ES to EAOC with GSR model by analyzing the functionomes consisted of 5917 GO defined functions of ES, CCC and EC with the DNA microarray datasets downloaded from the publicly available database. The results demonstrated that the immune/inflammation related functions were crucial elements involving in the transformation of EAOC. Among these dysregulated immune/inflammation related functions, the inflammasome complex (G0:0061702) is noticeable because it is postulated to become activated during malignant transformation of tumorigenesis and plays diverse roles in cancer promotion [14]. To study the role of inflammasome complex in the malignant transformation from ES to EACO, we explored the expressions of the inflammasome related genes by carrying out an integrative analysis with the same DNA microarray expression datasets. The results revealed several inflammasome complex and inflammasome-related genes (NLR Family Pyrin Domain Containing 3 (NLRP3), Absent In Melanoma 2 (AIM2), PYD And CARD Domain Containing (PYCARD), NLR Family Apoptosis Inhibitory Protein (NAIP), Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF), Toll Like Receptor 1 (TLR1), Toll Like Receptor 7 (TLR7), Toll Interacting Protein (TOLLIP), and NFKB Inhibitor Alpha (NFKBIA)) differentially expressed in ES, CCC and EC, and significantly correlating with poor progression-free survival. The expression levels of these identified genes were confirmed by immunohistochemistrical staining in ES, CCC and EC specimens. These findings are vital to clarify the role of inflammasome in EAOC carcinogenesis.

RESULTS

Workflow of the study

We utilize a two-stage strategy to discover the gene signatures involving in the transformation of EAOC, that is, starting with investigating the functionomes of ES, CCC and EC with the GSR model, and then followed by extracting the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involving in these deregulated functions with integrative analysis. During the first stage, the GSR model was applied to find out the deregulated function related to the malignant transformation, it consisted with 4 steps as displayed on the left side of Figure 1A. First, extraction of expression profiles of gene set elements. The gene expression profiles for a given gene set were extracted from the publicly available microarray datasets according to the gene elements defined by each gene set. Second, computing GSR indices. The extracted gene expression profiles were converted to quantified functions based on the gene expression orderings of the gene elements in each gene set defined by the 5917 GO terms. This quantified function, i.e. the GSR index, is a measurement of the expression regularity of the genes in that gene set. The quantified functions range from 0 to 1; 1 represented unchanged regularity in a given gene set between the case and the most common gene expression orderings in the normal controls, while 0 represented the most chaotic state of the gene set regularity. Third, validating the functional regularity patterns. The informativeness of the functionome consisted of the 5917 GSR indices is evaluated by the accuracies of classification and prediction by the machine learning. Finally, investigation of EAOC pathogenesis. In this step, the key deregulated functions involving in the malignant transformation of ES to CCC or EC are investigated by a secession of analytic procedures. During the second stage (right side of Figure 1A), an integrative analysis of DNA microarray was applied to detect the differentially expressed genes. Then the principle genes involving in the malignant transformation of EAOC were filtered from those genes related to the deregulated functions detected by the first stage of analysis.

Figure 1. Work flow of the two-stage strategy to discover gene signatures for EAOC.

Figure 1

(A) Workflow of the gene set regularity model. The gene set regularity (GSR) index was computed by converting the gene expression ordering of gene elements in a gene set through the Gene Ontology (GO) term or canonical pathway databases. The informativeness of the GSR index was assessed by the accuracy of recognition, classification, and prediction by machine learning using binary or multiclass classifications. Functionome analyses were carried out to investigate the pathogenesis of endometriosis (ES), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), endometrioid ca (EC) and endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma (EAOC) by statistical methods, hierarchical clustering, and exploratory factor analysis. (B) Heatmaps and dendrogram for the three diseases. The dendrogram (left side of the heatmap) showed the relationship of the three diseases. When displayed on the heatmap, each of the three diseases computed through either the GO term gene sets showed a distinct pattern. However, the patterns were more similar between CCC and EC.

The microarray gene expression profiles of ES, CCC, EC and the normal control samples were downloaded from the GEO database, including 107 ES, 156 normal endometrium controls, 85 CCC, 90 EC, and 136 normal ovarian tissue control samples (Table 1). These samples data were collected from 39 datasets containing 7 different DNA microarray platforms without missing data. The detailed sample information, including the DNA microarray platforms, dataset series, and accession number, were listed in Supplementary Table 1. Because different genes utilized in different microarray platforms, a total of 5905 common gene sets were utilized finally for the GSR model in this study. Table 1 displays the sample number, mean and standard deviation (SD) of the GSR indices for the three diseases and the normal tissue controls. The means of GSR indices for the three diseases were significantly lower than the controls, indicating that the functions are generally deteriorated in the ES, CCC or EC when comparing with the normal control group. The informativeness of the GSR indices was evaluated by the accuracies of classification and prediction for the functional regularity patterns of the three diseases. Supervised classification was performed by support vector machine (SVM) and the performance was assessed by the accuracies of the binary and multiclass classification of the GSR matrices computed from the total samples through 5905 GO term gene sets. The performance was tested by five-fold cross validation. The results showed up to 100% accuracies of binary classification (case vs control). The area under curves (AUCs) ranged from 0.98 to 1 (Table 2). The accuracies of multiclass classification among the three diseases and the normal control group were 98.68%. The high accuracies indicated that the GSR indices could provide sufficient information for the machine learning to recognize and undergo adequate recognition and classification. It also revealed distinct functional regularity patterns of ES, CCC and EC, which can be applied to the molecular classification among ES, CCC and EC. Unsupervised classification by the hierarchical clustering was performed to uncover the relationship between the three diseases (Figure 1B). The clustering data revealed a relatively close relationship between CCC and EC, and the detailed dendrogram of the GO terms were shown in Supplementary Figure 1. The heatmap (Figure 1B) also showed similar patterns between CCC and EC. There were many overlapped deregulated molecular functions and biological processes between CCC and EC, indicating a close etiology of these two types of cancer.

Table 1. Sample number and mean of the gene set regularity indexes for each group.

Disease Case Control Case Mean (SD) Control Mean (SD) P value
ES 107 156 0.6299(0.0832) 0.6715(0.0825) <2.2x10-16
CCC 85 136 0.6304(0.1034) 0.6532(0.1120) <2.2x10-16
EC 90 136 0.6466(0.0.1051) 0.6539(0.1116) <2.2x10-16

Table 2. Accuracies of the binary and multiclass classification and prediction by machine learning.

Gene set Classification Group Sensitivity(SD) Specificity(SD) Accuracy(SD) AUC
GO term Binary ES 1.0000(0.0000) 1.0000(0.0000) 1.0000(0.0000) 1.0000
CCC 1.0000(0.0000) 1.0000(0.0000) 1.0000(0.0000) 1.0000
EC 0.9597(0.0303) 0.9965(0.0109) 0.9800(0.0163) 0.9768
Multiclass ES-CCC-EC- control NA NA 0.9868(0.0046) NA

Discovering the deregulated functions involving in the malignant transformation of EAOC by mining the DNA microarray gene expression data

We used the set operations to identify commonly deregulated functions from the top 1000 significantly deregulated GO terms among ES, CCC and EC. There were 65 deregulated functions in common (Supplementary Table 2), revealing the possible etiology of malignant transformation of EAOC. Among the 65 deregulated functions, up to 16.9% (11/65) deregulated functions were relating to inflammation/immune, showing the important roles of inflammation/immune playing on the malignant transformation of EAOC. We then focused on the immune/inflammation related functions and extracted them from the functionomes of ES, CCC and EC using the following keys: ‘immune system process’ (GO:0002376), ‘response to stress’ (GO:0006950), ‘cytoplasmic part’ (GO:0044444), and ‘cytokine production’ (GO:0001816) to collect all of their offspring. Table 3 displayed the 114 most significantly deregulated immune/inflammation related GO terms in the three diseases. These immune/inflammation related GO terms were predominately associated with deregulated cytokines production, signaling pathways and activation of immune cells. We carried out the set operations with the 114 GO terms to discover the coexisting immune/inflammation related GO terms among ES, CCC and EC, and displayed the results on the Venn diagram in Figure 2A. The detailed information of the 114 genes were available in Supplementary Table 3. The CCC and EC shared the most number of overlapping deregulated GO terms, accounting for 50% (57/114) of the coexisting deregulated GO terms, indicating the similar immune pathogenesis between these two cancers. There were 9 commonly deregulated GO terms among the ES, CCC and EC as shown on the Figure 2B.

Table 3. The 114 most deregulated immune/inflammation related Gene Ontology terms for the three diseases ranked by the P values.

Endometriosis Clear cell carcinoma Endometrioid carcinoma
1 Golgi cisterna
GO:0031985
Negative regulation of antigen receptor mediated signaling pathway
GO:0050858
Regulation of B cell receptor signaling pathway
GO:0050855
2 Golgi stack
GO:0005795
Endoplasmic reticulum quality control compartment
GO:0044322
Wound healing spreading of epidermal cells
GO:0035313
3 Positive regulation of interleukin 2 biosynthetic process
GO:0045086
Regulation of B cell receptor signaling pathway
GO:0050855
Regulation of Toll like receptor 4 signaling pathway
GO:0034143
4 Interferon gamma mediated signaling pathway
GO:0060333
Regulation of natural killer cell activation
GO:0032814
Regulation of oxidative stress induced neuron death
GO:1903203
5 Response to interferon gamma
GO:0034341
Mast cell granule
GO:0042629
Lamellar body
GO:0042599
6 Cellular response to interferon gamma
GO:0071346
Positive regulation of endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response
GO:1900103
Smooth endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0005790
7 Adaptive immune response based on somatic recombination of immune receptors built from immunoglobulin superfamily domains
GO:0002460
Platelet alpha granule lumen
GO:0031093
Negative regulation of antigen receptor mediated signaling pathway
GO:0050858
8 Positive regulation of interleukin 8 production
GO:0032757
Lysosomal lumen
GO:0043202
T cell differentiation involved in immune response
GO:0002292
9 Intrinsic component of endoplasmic reticulum membrane
GO:0031227
Smooth endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0005790
Angiogenesis involved in wound healing
GO:0060055
10 Regulation of interleukin 8 production
GO:0032677
Regulation of Toll like receptor 4 signaling pathway
GO:0034143
Regulation of IRE1 mediated unfolded protein response
GO:1903894
11 Lymphocyte mediated immunity
GO:0002449
Platelet alpha granule
GO:0031091
Endoplasmic reticulum quality control compartment
GO:0044322
12 Golgi cisterna membrane
GO:0032580
Vacuolar lumen
GO:0005775
Methylosome
GO:0034709
13 Recycling endosome
GO:0055037
Positive regulation of macrophage activation
GO:0043032
Interferon gamma production
GO:0032609
14 Regulation of T helper cell differentiation
GO:0045622
Recycling endosome
GO:0055037
Regulation of response to interferon gamma
GO:0060330
15 Clathrin coated endocytic vesicle
GO:0045334
Secretory granule lumen
GO:0034774
Intrinsic component of Golgi membrane
GO:0031228
16 Lytic vacuole membrane
GO:0098852
Regulation of antigen receptor mediated signaling pathway
GO:0050854
Positive regulation of endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response
GO:1900103
17 Regulation of cellular response to heat
GO:1900034
Humoral immune response
GO:0006959
Autophagosome
GO:0005776
18 Late endosome
GO:0005770
ER to Golgi transport vesicle
GO:0030134
Positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter in response to stress
GO:0036003
19 Stress activated protein kinase signaling cascade
GO:0031098
Gamma tubulin complex
GO:0000930
Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response
GO:1900101
20 Autophagosome
GO:0005776
IRE1 mediated unfolded protein response
GO:0036498
Axon regeneration
GO:0031103
21 Recycling endosome membrane
GO:0055038
Endoplasmic reticulum Golgi intermediate compartment
GO:0005793
Regulation of T cell chemotaxis
GO:0010819
22 Leukocyte mediated immunity
GO:0002443
Cellular response to topologically incorrect protein
GO:0035967
Humoral immune response
GO:0006959
23 Smooth endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0005790
Mast cell mediated immunity
GO:0002448
Trans Golgi network membrane
GO:0032588
24 Positive regulation of t helper cell differentiation
GO:0045624
Myeloid leukocyte mediated immunity
GO:0002444
Trans Golgi network transport vesicle membrane
GO:0012510
25 Humoral immune response mediated by circulating immunoglobulin
GO:0002455
Mast cell activation
GO:0045576
Mature B cell differentiation
GO:0002335
26 JNK cascade
GO:0007254
Intrinsic component of mitochondrial outer membrane
GO:0031306
Vesicle coat
GO:0030120
27 Positive regulation of cd4 positive alpha beta T cell activation
GO:2000516
Lamellar body
GO:0042599
Complement activation
GO:0006956
28 Endosomal part
GO:0044440
Spleen development
GO:0048536
Neutrophil mediated immunity
GO:0002446
29 Response to heat
GO:0009408
Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response
GO:1900101
Microbody lumen
GO:0031907
30 Vacuolar membrane
GO:0005774
Regulation of IRE1 mediated unfolded protein response
GO:1903894
Adaptive immune response based on somatic recombination of immune receptors built from immunoglobulin superfamily domains
GO:0002460
31 Cellular response to heat
GO:0034605
Autophagosome
GO:0005776
Clathrin coat of trans Golgi network vesicle
GO:0030130
32 Regulation of cd4 positive alpha beta T cell activation
GO:2000514
Negative regulation of T cell proliferation
GO:0042130
Humoral immune response mediated by circulating immunoglobulin
GO:0002455
33 Endosome
GO:0005768
Toll like receptor 4 signaling pathway
GO:0034142
Cd4 positive alpha beta T cell activation
GO:0035710
34 Vacuolar part
GO:0044437
ER associated ubiquitin dependent protein catabolic process
GO:0030433
Trans Golgi network transport vesicle
GO:0030140
35 Antigen processing and presentation
GO:0019882
Positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase ii promoter in response to stress
GO:0036003
Cellular response to heat
GO:0034605
36 Endosome lumen
GO:0031904
Negative regulation of T cell differentiation
GO:0045581
Regulation of acute inflammatory response
GO:0002673
37 Microtubule organizing center part
GO:0044450
Cellular senescence
GO:0090398
Thymic T cell selection
GO:0045061
38 Regulation of interleukin 2 biosynthetic process
GO:0045076
Natural killer cell mediated immunity
GO:0002228
B cell mediated immunity
GO:0019724
39 Thymic T cell selection
GO:0045061
Regulation of p38mapk cascade
GO:1900744
Positive regulation of response to oxidative stress
GO:1902884
40 B cell receptor signaling pathway
GO:0050853
Adaptive immune response based on somatic recombination of immune receptors built from immunoglobulin superfamily domains
GO:0002460
Intrinsic component of mitochondrial outer membrane
GO:0031306
41 Positive regulation of B cell proliferation
GO:0030890
Wound healing spreading of epidermal cells
GO:0035313
Myeloid leukocyte mediated immunity
GO:0002444
42 Golgi membrane
GO:0000139
Trans Golgi network transport vesicle
GO:0030140
Cytokine production involved in immune response
GO:0002367
43 Regulation of humoral immune response
GO:0002920
ERAD pathway
GO:0036503
Sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane
GO:0033017
44 Regulation of cytokine biosynthetic process
GO:0042035
Positive regulation of natural killer cell mediated immunity
GO:0002717
Regulation of humoral immune response
GO:0002920
45 Myeloid leukocyte differentiation
GO:0002573
Axon regeneration
GO:0031103
Positive regulation of interleukin 10 production
GO:0032733
46 Lymphocyte costimulation
GO:0031294
Neutrophil mediated immunity
GO:0002446
Regulation of interleukin 13 production
GO:0032656
47 Complement activation
GO:0006956
Regulation of DNA repair
GO:0006282
Defense response to gram positive bacterium
GO:0050830
48 Perinuclear region of cytoplasm
GO:0048471
Trans Golgi network transport vesicle membrane
GO:0012510
Mast cell granule
GO:0042629
49 B cell mediated immunity
GO:0019724
Leukocyte mediated immunity
GO:0002443
Base excision repair
GO:0006284
50 Positive regulation of chemokine production
GO:0032722
COPI vesicle coat
GO:0030126
Derlin 1 retrotranslocation complex
GO:0036513
51 Regulation of chemokine production
GO:0032642
Base excision repair
GO:0006284
Complement activation alternative pathway
GO:0006957
52 Positive regulation of DNA damage response signal transduction by p53 class mediator
GO:0043517
Perk mediated unfolded protein response
GO:0036499
Clathrin vesicle coat
GO:0030125
53 Endocytic vesicle
GO:0030139
Cellular response to heat
GO:0034605
Regulation of tumor necrosis factor biosynthetic process
GO:0042534
54 Cytosolic part
GO:0044445
Vesicle coat
GO:0030120
Positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase ii promoter in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress
GO:1990440
55 Vacuole
GO:0005773
Cytoplasmic mRNA processing body
GO:0000932
Gamma tubulin complex
GO:0000930
56 Golgi apparatus
GO:0005794
Cellular extravasation
GO:0045123
COPI coated vesicle membrane
GO:0030663
57 Positive regulation of cytokine production involved in immune response
GO:0002720
Endosome lumen
GO:0031904
Endosome lumen
GO:0031904
58 Inflammasome complex
GO:0061702
Regulation of natural killer cell mediated immunity
GO:0002715
ER to Golgi transport vesicle membrane
GO:0012507
59 Cellular response to stress
GO:0033554
ER to Golgi transport vesicle membrane
GO:0012507
Response to pain
GO:0048265
60 Regulation of defense response to virus by host
GO:0050691
Blood coagulation fibrin clot formation
GO:0072378
Negative regulation of interferon gamma production
GO:0032689
61 Microbody membrane
GO:0031903
Positive regulation of interleukin 6 secretion
GO:2000778
Negative regulation of cytokine biosynthetic process
GO:0042036
62 Regulation of interleukin 2 production
GO:0032663
Negative regulation of hemopoiesis
GO:1903707
COPI vesicle coat
GO:0030126
63 Golgi apparatus part
GO:0044431
T cell differentiation involved in immune response
GO:0002292
Positive regulation of acute inflammatory response
GO:0002675
64 Secretory granule
GO:0030141
Defense response to gram positive bacterium
GO:0050830
Negative regulation of T cell differentiation
GO:0045581
65 Cytosolic large ribosomal subunit
GO:0022625
Intrinsic component of mitochondrial membrane
GO:0098573
Error prone translesion synthesis
GO:0042276
66 Positive regulation of interleukin 2 production
GO:0032743
Positive regulation of leukocyte migration
GO:0002687
Negative regulation of DNA repair
GO:0045738
67 Regulation of cellular response to stress
GO:0080135
Positive regulation of leukocyte chemotaxis
GO:0002690
Negative regulation of response to endoplasmic reticulum stress
GO:1903573
68 Innate immune response
GO:0045087
Platelet aggregation
GO:0070527
Positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor production
GO:0010575
69 Positive regulation of immune response
GO:0050778
Clathrin coat
GO:0030118
Regulation of lymphocyte chemotaxis
GO:1901623
70 Adaptive immune response
GO:0002250
Response to misfolded protein
GO:0051788
Regulation of cellular response to hypoxia
GO:1900037
71 Intrinsic component of Golgi membrane
GO:0031228
Positive regulation of interleukin 10 production
GO:0032733
Regulation of macrophage activation
GO:0043030
72 Large ribosomal subunit
GO:0015934
Clathrin coat of trans Golgi network vesicle
GO:0030130
Defense response to fungus
GO:0050832
73 Vacuolar lumen
GO:0005775
Regulation of double strand break repair
GO:2000779
Zymogen granule
GO:0042588
74 Macrophage differentiation
GO:0030225
Regulation of leukocyte chemotaxis
GO:0002688
Cell cortex region
GO:0099738
75 Activation of immune response
GO:0002253
Regulation of macrophage activation
GO:0043030
Regulation of double strand break repair
GO:2000779
76 Regulation of interferon beta production
GO:0032648
Regulation of leukocyte migration
GO:0002685
Lysosomal lumen
GO:0043202
77 Leukocyte migration
GO:0050900
Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress induced intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway
GO:1902235
Recycling endosome membrane
GO:0055038
78 Positive regulation of response to DNA damage stimulus
GO:2001022
Clathrin vesicle coat
GO:0030125
Toll like receptor 4 signaling pathway
GO:0034142
79 Defense response to otherorganism
GO:0098542
Myeloid cell activation involved in immune response
GO:0002275
Retrograde protein transport ER to cytosol
GO:0030970
80 Transport vesicle
GO:0030133
Inflammasome complex
GO:0061702
Positive regulation of macrophage activation
GO:0043032
81 Positive regulation of immune effector process
GO:0002699
Granulocyte differentiation
GO:0030851
Innate immune response in mucosa
GO:0002227
82 Response to water deprivation
GO:0009414
Non recombinational repair
GO:0000726
Granulocyte differentiation
GO:0030851
83 Mitochondrion
GO:0005739
Antimicrobial humoral response
GO:0019730
Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor production
GO:0010574
84 Myeloid cell differentiation
GO:0030099
Regulation of removal of superoxide radicals
GO:2000121
Inflammasome complex
GO:0061702
85 Regulation of macrophage activation
GO:0043030
Autophagosome membrane
GO:0000421
Endocytic vesicle lumen
GO:0071682
86 Negative regulation of platelet activation
GO:0010544
Negative regulation of wound healing
GO:0061045
Negative regulation of humoral immune response
GO:0002921
87 Regulation of response to DNA damage stimulus
GO:2001020
Lymphocyte mediated immunity
GO:0002449
Regulation of cellular extravasation
GO:0002691
88 Immune effector process
GO:0002252
Negative regulation of T cell receptor signaling pathway
GO:0050860
Outer mitochondrial membrane protein complex
GO:0098799
89 Endocytic vesicle membrane
GO:0030666
Regulation of neutrophil migration
GO:1902622
Regulation of fibrinolysis
GO:0051917
90 Negative T cell selection
GO:0043383
Rough endoplasmic reticulum membrane
GO:0030867
B cell proliferation
GO:0042100
91 Immune system process
GO:0002376
Pre autophagosomal structure
GO:0000407
Regulation of interleukin 8 secretion
GO:2000482
92 Regulation of defense response to virus
GO:0050688
Defense response to fungus
GO:0050832
Hematopoietic stem cell proliferation
GO:0071425
93 Negative regulation of innate immune response
GO:0045824
Positive regulation of response to oxidative stress
GO:1902884
PERK mediated unfolded protein response
GO:0036499
94 Regulation of immune effector process
GO:0002697
Intrinsic component of Golgi membrane
GO:0031228
Regulation of megakaryocyte differentiation
GO:0045652
95 Secretory vesicle
GO:0099503
Error prone translesion synthesis
GO:0042276
Response to misfolded protein
GO:0051788
96 Positive regulation of B cell activation
GO:0050871
Negative regulation of lymphocyte differentiation
GO:0045620
Positive regulation of interleukin 8 secretion
GO:2000484
97 Early endosome membrane
GO:0031901
Regulation of cellular extravasation
GO:0002691
Mast cell mediated immunity
GO:0002448
98 Cytosolic ribosome
GO:0022626
Golgi lumen
GO:0005796
Response to immobilization stress
GO:0035902
99 Cellular response to glucose starvation
GO:0042149
Recycling endosome membrane
GO:0055038
Negative regulation of alpha beta T cell activation
GO:0046636
100 Centriole
GO:0005814
Regulation of Toll like receptor signaling pathway
GO:0034121
Mature B cell differentiation involved in immune response
GO:0002313
101 Regulation of alpha beta T cell differentiation
GO:0046637
Hyperosmotic response
GO:0006972
Mitotic G2 DNA damage checkpoint
GO:0007095
102 Regulation of immune response
GO:0050776
COPI coated vesicle membrane
GO:0030663
Negative regulation of alpha beta T cell differentiation
GO:0046639
103 Clathrin coated vesicle
GO:0030136
Somatic recombination of immunoglobulin gene segments
GO:0016447
Tricarboxylic acid cycle enzyme complex
GO:0045239
104 DNA damage response detection of DNA damage
GO:0042769
Neuron projection regeneration
GO:0031102
Positive regulation of monocyte chemotaxis
GO:0090026
105 Regulation of adaptive immune response
GO:0002819
Clathrin coat of endocytic vesicle
GO:0030128
Wash complex
GO:0071203
106 Ribosome
GO:0005840
Erythrocyte maturation
GO:0043249
Regulation of removal of superoxide radicals
GO:2000121
107 Regulation of B cell proliferation
GO:0030888
Hemoglobin complex
GO:0005833
Protein phosphatase type 1 complex
GO:0000164
108 Mitochondrial part
GO:0044429
Response to pain
GO:0048265
Bloc complex
GO:0031082
109 Regulation of type I interferon production
GO:0032479
B cell homeostasis
GO:0001782
Negative regulation of platelet activation
GO:0010544
110 Activation of JUN kinase activity
GO:0007257
Negative regulation of interferon gamma production
GO:0032689
Regulation of chemokine biosynthetic process
GO:0045073
111 Positive regulation of lymphocyte differentiation
GO:0045621
Response to axon injury
GO:0048678
Regulation of regulatory T cell differentiation
GO:0045589
112 Regulation of macrophage differentiation
GO:0045649
Negative regulation of interleukin 6 production
GO:0032715
Hemoglobin complex
GO:0005833
113 Positive regulation of type 2 immune response
GO:0002830
B cell proliferation
GO:0042100
Negative regulation of endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response
GO:1900102
114 Regulation of B cell activation
GO:0050864
Negative regulation of alpha beta T cell activation
GO:0046636
Negative regulation of Toll like receptor signaling pathway
GO:0034122

Figure 2. DNA microarray gene expression data mining of deregulated functions involving in the malignant transformation of EAOC.

Figure 2

(A) Venn diagram of the deregulated GO term elements from exploratory factor analysis for the three diseases. The figure showed the results of the three diseases with the total factor elements from each of the disease. Their relationship was displayed on the Venn diagram to show the gene set numbers of all possible logical relations among the three diseases. The 9 commonly deregulated GO terms among ES, CCC and EC were listed on the right side of the figure. (B) The nine commonly deregulated GO terms among the ES, CCC, and EC, including ‘inflammasome complex’ was shown.

GO tree analysis of the relationship between deregulated immune/inflammation functions

To concentrate and view the hierarchy of the numerous identified deregulated GO terms, we mapped the immune/inflammation related GO terms to the GO tree based on the parent-child relationship. The related GO terms on the GO tree were then clustered together so the relationship of these GO terms can be visualized and summarized up as Figure 3 shown. The deregulated functions on the GO trees for ES could be summarized to ‘immune response’, ‘inflammation response’, ‘cytokine production’ and ‘inflammasome complex’. The inflammasome complex was highlighted because it was known to be an activator the carcinogenesis in many cancers. The full GO trees of the three diseases are available in Supplementary Figure 2-4. The data-mining approach above revealed the inflammasome complex was one of the most crucial candidate function initiating the malignant transformation of EAOC. In order to discover the genes involving in the inflammasome complex for further investigation and confirmation, we carried out an integrative analysis using the same microarray gene expression datasets to detect the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of the three diseases. All of the gene expressions of the samples in each dataset were rescaled to the cumulative proportion for the integrative analysis. The full table of the DEGs is available in Supplementary Table 4. We then filtered the genes that were related to inflammasome complex. This filtering obtained a list of 47 genes, as shown in Supplementary Table 5.

Figure 3. GO tree analysis.

Figure 3

The GO tree of deregulated functions of CCC establish with the significant GO terms involving in the inflammation and immune system. After mapping to the GO tree, the similar or related GO terms were clustered together and shown the parent-child relationship. The table listed the immune or inflammation-related GO terms, the GOIDs and their p values in the GO trees.

Expression of inflammasome complex and inflammasome-related genes correlate with poor survival outcome in EAOC patients

To further illustrate the role of inflammasome in EAOC progression, we used Kaplan–Meier plotter (http://www.kmplot.com/ovar) to explore the correlation between EAOC patient survival and the expression levels of inflammasome complex as well as inflammasome-related geneses. Inflammasomes are multimeric protein complexes. Activation of inflammasomes and regulation of related pathway capable of orchestrating host inflammation and immunity [15, 16]. The component of inflammasome in tumorigenesis included inflammasome complex and inflammasome-related pathway [17, 18]. Inflammasome complex included nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs), absent in melanoma 2(AIM2) and apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC). NLRs and AIM2 recruit pro-caspase and promote its autocatalytic cleavage into active caspase, which leads to a cascade of pro-inflammatory events via the activation of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, which then interacts with their membranes receptors (TLR, TNF, INF, P2RX7) and related pathway amplifying the inflammatory response. We checked the 47 genes in Supplementary Table 5; they included 7 genes of inflammasome complex (NLRP3, AIM2, PYCARD, NAIP, Caspase-4, Caspase-7 and Caspase-8) and 11 genes of the inflammasome-related pathway (TLR1, TLR7, TOLLIP, NFKBIA, TNF, TNFAIP3, INFGR2, P2RX7, IL-1B, IL1RL1 and IL-18). Based on a database created by Gyorffy et al. [19], we correlated the gene expression levels of 18 highly expressed inflammasome markers, including 7 inflammasome complex genes and 11 inflammasome genes related pathway, with EAOC patient survival outcome. We found that high expression levels of the 7 inflammasome complex genes (NLRP3, AIM2, PYCARD, NAIP, Caspase-4, Caspase-7 and Caspase-8) tend to correlate with poor patient survival, and four of them (NLRP3, AIM2, PYCARD, NAIP) were statistically significant (Figure 4). NLRP3 and AIM2 are the initiators of inflammasomes, while PYCARD and NAIP are the core proteins of inflammasomes. These results indicated a potential direct involvement of inflammasome in EAOC progression. In the 11 genes inflammasome-related pathway (TLR1, TLR7, TOLLIP, NFKBIA, TNF, TNFAIP3, INFGR2, P2RX7, IL-1B, IL1RL1 and IL-18), high expression of these genes tended to correlate with poor survival of EAOC patients and 5 of them (TLR1, TLR7, TOLLIP, NFKBIA and TNF) reached statistical significance (Figure 5). The other 9 inflammasome-related genes (Caspase-4, Caspase-7, Caspase-8, TNFAIP3, INFGR2, P2RX7, IL-1B, IL1RL1 and IL-18) were not correlate with survival of the EAOC patients (Supplementary Figure 5-6). The flowchart and selection criteria of the EAOC marker genes were demonstrated as Supplementary Figure 7. These results indicated the involvements of inflammasome complex and inflammasome-related pathways in mediating EAOC disease progression.

Figure 4. Inflammasome complex correlate with survival outcome in EAOC patients.

Figure 4

Kaplan–Meier plotter survival curves showed significant difference of EAOC survival with different expression level of inflammasome complex (NLRP3, AIM2, PYCARD, NAIP). HR = 5.14, 95% CI 1.47 to 17.92, p-value = 0.044; HR = 5.71, 95% CI 1.31 to 24.85, p-value = 0.086; HR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.03 to 6.65, p-value = 0.035; HR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 7.14, p-value = 0.023, respectively.

Figure 5. The survival of EAOC patients are correlate with inflammasome-related genes.

Figure 5

Kaplan–Meier plotter survival curves showed significant difference of EAOC survival with different expression level of inflammasome-related genes (TNF, FOXO3, TLR7, NFKBIA). HR = 6.08, 95% CI 1.4 to 26.49, p-value = 0.061; HR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.24 to 8.02, p-value = 0.011; HR = 3.96, 95% CI 1.14 to 13.73, p-value = 0.019; HR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 9.53, p-value = 0.034, respectively.

Notably, the survival outcome of EAOC patients was highly correlated with NLRP3, AIM2, and TNF. The hazard ratio of NLRP3 / AIM2 / TNF were 5.14(1.47-17.92) / 5.71(1.31-24.85) / 6.08(1.4-26.49), respectively; p = 0.0044 / 0.0086 / 0.0061, respectively) (Figure 4 and 5). These results suggested key roles of the three inflammasome proteins and related pathways in promoting EAOC progression as well as their prognostic value in EAOC.

Based on the survival analysis (Figure 4 and 5), we used the 9 inflammasome markers and STRING database (https://string-db.org) to establish a functional interaction network (Figure 6A). As members of inflammasome complex and inflammasome pathway related genes, the 9 proteins showed intensive interactions and regulatory crosstalk. This interactive network supported the involvement and key role of inflammation in EAOC malignant progression. Collectively, we demonstrated that the NLRP3, AIM2, PYCARD, NAIP, TLR1, TLR7, TOLLIP, NFKBIA and TNF would be the potential markers of prognosis in EAOC (Figure 6B).

Figure 6. Interaction analysis of identified genes.

Figure 6

(A) The identified potential involving genes were subjected to a protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis by establishing an interactive network from the STRING database (https://string-db.org). As members of inflammasome complex and inflammasome-related genes, their proteins showed intensive interactions. The average node degree is 3.56, and the PPI enrichment p-value is 3.33x10-15, significantly more interactions than expected. (B) The p values of each gene in the three diseases were showed in the chart. The progressive changes of p values from ES to CCC and EC demonstrated that the NLRP3, AIM2, PYCARD, NAIP, TLR7, NFKBIA, TNF, FOXO3 would be the potential markers of prognosis in EAOC.

Immunohistochemistrical analysis for AIM2 expression among the three diseases

To evaluate the clinical significance of the identified inflammasome-related genes in ovarian cancer transformation, we collected a cohort of clinical samples (ES, n = 13; CCC, n = 15; EC, n = 15) and immunostained them with anti-AIM2 antibody. We found increased AIM2 protein level in CCC and EC samples in comparison to ES samples (Figure 7A). Quantification of AIM2 levels in all samples showed a higher mean value of AIM2 protein expression in both cancer types than in ES (Figure 7B). We then calculated the case numbers of AIM2-high and AIM2-low, as well as Ki-67-high and Ki-67-low in ES, CCC, and EC samples, and correlated the status of the two markers in each type of samples. As shown in Figure 7C–7E, we generally observed a positive correlation between the expression levels of Ki-67 and AIM2. In the 13 ES samples, all of them exhibited only low levels of Ki-67 and AIM2 (Figure 7C), while in the CCC samples, 12 out of 15 expressed high levels of Ki-67 and AIM2 (Figure 7E). In the group of EC, 5 samples expressed high Ki-67 and AIM2 level, and 6 expressed low levels of the two proteins (Figure 7D). Calculation of the percentage of AIM2-high case showed a progressive increase from ES to EC and to CCC (Figure 7C–7E). These results provid clinical evidence supporting the involvement of AIM2 in the malignant transformation of ES to CCC/EC.

Figure 7. Immunohistochemistrical analysis of clinical samples from patients with ES, EC, and CCC.

Figure 7

(A) Clinical samples from patients with ES (n = 13), EC (n = 15), and CCC (n = 15) were immunostained with anti-AIM2 antibody. (B) The expression levels of AIM2 in all clinical samples were quantified and presented in the chart. The mean values of AIM2 expression in EC and CCC were higher than that in ES. (C-E) Samples were stained with Ki-67 and AIM2. The case numbers of ES, EC, and CCC with high and low expression levels of Ki-67 and AIM2 were calculated and displayed in the chart. The percentages of each combination were also calculated. The AIM2 levels was positively correlated with Ki-67 levels.

Working model of inflammasome in endometriosis associated ovarian carcinoma

Based on our data-driven analysis and lab validation, we proposed a working model of the association between inflammasome in endometriosis and the progression of ovarian cancer. In the microenvironment of ovarian endometrioma, inflammasome is driven directly by specific DAMPs or by the two-signal model as in the case of NLRP3 in the microenvironment of ovarian endometrioma, The recognition of DAMPs by extracellular TLRs leads to the activation of NF-κB (first signal), which in turn promotes the transcription of pro- inflammatory cytokines or some NLRs (e.g.NLRP3). NLRs assemble into the inflammasome complex which via the CARD domain can recruit pro-caspase and promote its autocatalytic cleavage (second signal). Active caspase can lead to a cascade of pro-inflammatory events via the activation of pro- inflammatory cytokines, which then interact with their own membrane receptors amplifying the inflammatory response. On the other hand, active caspase can lead to cell pyroptosis with the consequence of the release of inflammatory cytokines. Inflammatory cytokines activated oncogene over-expression then induced EAOC carcinogenesis (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Working model of the inflammasome in endometriosis associated ovarian cancer.

Figure 8

This model presents the microenvironment in endometrioma of the ovary. Retrograded menstruation accumulated in ovary provoked DAMPs and caused chronic inflammation. Inflammasome related genes (NLRP3, AIM2, PYCARD, NAIP, TNF, FOXO3, TLR7, NFKBIA) were activated subsequently. Activated caspase can lead to cell pyroptosis with the consequence of the release of inflammatory cytokines. Finally, inflammatory cytokines induced oncogene over-expression then produced EAOC carcinogenesis.

DISCUSSION

Complex diseases usually involve in a spectrum of variable deregulated functions. So we investigated the pathogenesis of EAOC with the functionome consisted of 5917 GO defined functions computed from large-scale microarray gene expression profiles. We demonstrated the informativeness of the GSR indices was sufficient for machine learning to accurately recognize and classify these complex diseases based on the functional regularity patterns. The patterns were similar between CCC and EC as showed on the heatmap (Figure 2), revealing the possibility of homogeneous etiology between these two cancers. We further investigated the common deregulated functions among ES, CCC, and EC to discover the candidate elements involving in the malignant transformation from ES to CCC or EC. Our study revealed the consistent findings: the ‘activation of immune response’ in ES; the ‘humoral immune response’ deregulated GO terms for CCC and EC. Moreover, the deregulated GO term ‘inflammatory response’ (GO:0006954) coexisted in ES, CCC, and EC. We further checked the immune/inflammation related GO terms in the functionomes of the three diseases. The set analysis using the top significant 114 immunes/inflammation related GO terms for the three diseases showed nine common deregulated GO terms, and the existence of inflammasome complex in this list is noticeable because it has been demonstrated to be a critical promoter of carcinogenesis in various cancers. Then we checked the DEGs detected from the same DNA microarray datasets, the inflammasome related genes, including NLRP3, AIM2, PYCARD, NAIP, TLR1, TLR7, TOLLIP, NFKBIA and TNF were demonstrated to be differentially expressed in the three diseases and also significantly correlated with poor progression-free survival. Finally, high expressions level of AIM2 were confirmed in EC and CCC, in comparison to ES, by immunohistochemical analysis, and is correlated with high level of Ki-67. Our results support that a close relationship between endometriosis and clear cell carcinoma/endometrioid carcinoma, and support the hypothesis of endometriosis associated ovarian carcinoma. Dysregulated inflammasome could be a fundamental role in modulating the malignant transformation of EAOC, which also broadens the scope of the inflammation/immunity as a molecular biomarker in monitoring the malignant transformation of endometriosis and also could be the treatment target of endometriosis associated ovarian cancer. To the best of our knowledge, these findings are vital to clarify the role of the inflammasome in EAOC carcinogenesis.

The inflammatory microenvironment has been revealed to play crucial roles in all stages of tumor development [20]. Pathogen or damage signals that trigger inflammation have been reported to drive tumorigenesis in many forms of cancer [11]; immune cells that trigger inflammation were also associated with tumor development [21]. The immune microenvironment is critical for the carcinogenesis of EAOC. The cell proliferation resulted from aberrations humoral immunity and complement pathway activation was postulated to play a major role in the pathogenesis of EAOC [22]. Cancer-immune phenotypes in humans can be divided into three main categories: the immune-desert phenotype, the immune–excluded phenotype and the inflamed phenotype. Each is related to specific underlying biological mechanisms that may prevent the host’s immune response from eliminating cancer. Inflamed tumors are infiltrated by a variety subtypes of immune cells including immune-inhibitory regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts [23]. The presence of intratumoral T cells independently associated with delayed recurrence or prolonged survival in multivariate analysis of advanced ovarian carcinoma and was related to increased expression of interferon-γ, interleukin-2, and lymphocyte-attracting chemokines within the tumor [24]. Anti-inflammatory effects in autoimmune diseases and neurodegeneration also appeared to suppress the inflammatory activity of TLR4-NF-κB/ NLRP3 inflammasome pathway and provided novel mechanistic insights for the potential therapeutic for cervical cancer [25]. The inflammasome of NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) is a complex protein involved in the induction of innate inflammatory/immune responses. The complex consists of the NLRP3 protein, which serve as a sensor for the activation of the inflammasome, and an apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD complex (ASC), which recruits pro-caspase through its CARD domain. Pro-caspase is then interchange to active caspase, which, in turn, cleaves pro-inflammatory cytokines (pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18) to their active forms. IL-1β and IL-18 to promote inflammation by recruiting additional inflammatory/immune cells. Then oncogene could be activated. Thus, NLRP3 signaling persistent sterile inflammation could be the initial stage of carcinogenesis.

AIM (absent in melanoma 2) can induce inflammasome upon intracellularly delivery of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) to protect cells against pathogens like virus and bacteria. AIM2 is a cytosolic dsDNA sensor and directly interacts with dsDNA, mainly from virus or bacteria, through its C-terminal HIN-200 domain, leading to a serial activation of inflammation proteins and form AIM2 inflammasome. Activation of the AIM2 inflammasome and other canonical inflammasomes results in a type of inflammatory cell death called pyroptosis. Chronic inflammation of the benign prostate hyperplasia was reported closely related to prostate cancer. Recent studies showed that AIM2 inflammasome plays a critial roles in the tumor progression of prostate cancer. Activation of AIM2 was served as a biomarker to identify the molecular mechanisms through prostatic infections and/or sterile inflammation contribute to the carcinogenesis of prostatic cancer [26]. In our comparative bioinformatic analysis between endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma, we found AIM2 diversely expressed in the two groups of data, suggesting a role of AIM2 in promoting the progression of ovarian carcinoma. Notably, the analysis of immunohistochemistry staining further confirmed a correlation between high AIM2 expression and high Ki-67 activity in clinical EAOC samples, supporting that AIM2 and inflammasome play a key regulatory role in EAOC transformation and disease progression. Therefore, based on our findings, inflammation mechanism is suggested as the key regulatory step mediated the malignant transformation of endometriosis. Further in vivo study to investigate whether NLRP3/AIM2 contributes to EAOC carcinogenesis and the role of the inflammasome in EAOC is imperative.

This investigation has limitations, though. First, the GO term gene set database does not define the comphehensive human functions yet. Therefore, undefined immulogical functions involving in the malignant transformation may be missed in the current analysis. Second, the GSR model may produce false positive results because of similar gene elements in different gene sets. For example, the 47th desregulated functions for EC ‘Defense response to gram positive bacterium (GO:0050830)’ in the Table 3 may potentially be a false positivity; because to our knowledge, there is no evidence showing the involvement of gram positive vacterial infection in the etiology of EC. It may raise from the duplicated gene elements in the gene set definitions. Third, the case number for the immunohistochemistrical analysis is relatively small. More cases are necessary to clarify the pathogenesis of EAOC in the future.

In conclusion, we established a bioinformatic platform of gene-set integrative molecular functionome to dissect the molecular pathogenetic pathways of EAOC and demonstrated dysregulated inflammasomes play a fundamental role in modulating the malignant transformation and cancer progression in EAOC. Our results support the hypothesis that endometriosis shares similar genetic signatures with EAOC that validated by data-driven analysis and tissue array, which also broaden the scope of the inflammation/immunity as a molecular biomarker in monitoring the malignant transformation of endometriosis and also could be the treatment target of endometriosis associated ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computing the GSR indices

The regulation of the GO terms were quantified by the GSR model, which converted gene expression profiles to quantified functions by the modifying the Differential Rank Conservation (DIRAC) [27] algorithm. This model quantifies the ordering change of the gene elements in a gene set between the gene expression orderings in ES, CCC or EC and the most common gene expression ordering in the normal control population in this study. Microarray gene expression profiles were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database as.SOFT format, and then the gene expression levels were extracted according to the corresponding gene elements in the GO term gene set and converted to the ordinal data based on their expression levels. The GSR index is the ratio of gene expression ordering in a gene set between each case or normal control sample and the most common gene expression ordering among the normal tissue samples. Computing the GSR indices was executed in R environment. The detail of the GSR model and the computing procedures are described in our previous study [21].

Gene set definition, microarray datasets and data processing

The versions of the GO gene set definitions were c5.all.v6.0.symbols.gmt (2017), downloaded from the MSigDB and contained 5917 GO gene sets. The selection criteria for the downloaded microarray gene expression datasets were: 1. The datasets should provide definite information on the diagnosis for each sample; 2. Because this study utilized the common genes among the selected datasets; a dataset was discarded if it resulted in the number of common genes less than 8000 when it was integrated.

Statistical analysis

The differences of the GSR indices between the three diseases and the control groups were tested by Mann Whitney U test and corrected by multiple hypotheses using false discovery rate (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure). The significance level was set at <0.01. Progression-free survival (PFS) data of endometrioid ovarian cancer were available for 51 patients obtained from kmplot.com. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves for endometrioid ovarian cancer can be reached at http://www.kmplot.com/ovar. Hazard ratio (HR; and 95% confidence intervals) and logrank P are calculated and displayed with website.

Classification and prediction by machine learning

GSR indices computed through the GO term gene sets were classified and predicted by the support vector machine (SVM) with kernlab [28], an R package for kernel-based machine learning methods and was used to classify patterns of the GSR indices with the setting of kernel = ‘vanilladot’ (linear kernel function). The performance of classification and prediction by SVM were measured by 5-fold cross-validation: samples were randomly sampled and divided into 5 parts, 4 parts were used for training sets and the remainder one part for prediction. The performance of binary classification was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC were computed using the results of successive 10 classifications. AUC was computed by an R package pROC [29]. The accuracy of multiclass classification was computed from the fraction of correct predictions within total prediction number.

Hierarchical clustering, dendrogram and heatmaps

The GSR indices in each gene set were averaged then underwent hierarchical clustering with the function ‘heatmap.2’ in R package ‘gplots’ (version 3.0.1) as default. This function executed hierarchical clustering, and drew dendrogram and heatmaps.

All possible logical relations among the deregulated functions of the three diseases were evaluated and displayed by Venn diagram using the R package ‘VennDiagram’ (version 1.6.17).

Reconstruction of GO trees and detection of differentially expressed genes

The GO tree were reconstructed by the ‘RamiGO’ [30], an R package providing functions to interact with the AmiGO 2 web server (http://amigo2.berkeleybop.org/amigo) and retrieves GO trees. To discover the DEGs for each of ES, CCC and EC, we carried out an integrative analysis with the same DNA microarray datasets. The gene expression levels of all samples in each dataset were transformed and rescaled to cumulative proportion values from 0 (lowest expression) to 1 (highest expression) with an R package “YuGene” (version 1.1.5) before integration. The DEGs were discovered using linear model computed with empirical Bayes analysis by the functions “lmFit” and “eBayes” provided by the R package “limna” (version 3.26.9).

Clinical samples

The present study included 30 archived ovarian cancers (clear cell, N = 15 and endometrioid, N = 15), 13 ovarian endometrioma. In the cases of ovarian cancer, tissues were collected from women underwent surgery as their treatment guideline, and tissue specimens of endometrioma were collected from women who had ovarian endometrioma undergone a surgery of ovarian cystectomy. The patients were diagnosed and treated and had their tissues placed in a bank at the Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. All invasive cancers were confirmed by histopathology. The Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center approved the study. Informed consent was acquired from all patients and control subjects.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FIGURES AND TABLES

Acknowledgments

We thank Hui-Yin Su for figures editing and Huan-Shuo Chang for assistant preparation of experimental materials.

Author contributions

Conception and design of the experiments: Chia-Ming Chang, Cheng-Chang Chang, Peng-Hwei Wang

The performance of the experiments: Yi-Ping Yang

Analyses of the data: Chia-Ming Chang, Kai-Hsi Lu, Chi-Mou Juang

Contribution of reagents/materials/analysis tools: Yi-Ping Yang

Drafting and editing of the manuscript: Chia-Ming Chang, Mong-Lien Wang, Cheng-Chang Chang

Recruitment and collection of clinical samples: Cheng-Chang Chang, Ren-Jun Hsu, and Mu-Hsien Yu.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All authors declared no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING

This work was supported in part by the following grants: TSGH-C105-010 and TSGH-C106-080 from the Tri-Service General Hospital; MOST 106-2314-B-016-042 from Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C.; the Teh-Tzer Study Group for Human Medical Research. This work was also supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 103-2314-B-010-043-MY3, and MOST 106-2314-B-075-061-MY3) and the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Grant V104C-095, V105C-096, V106C-129; V106D23-001-MY2-1; and V106A-012), Taipei, Taiwan. We thank Hui-Yin Su for figure editing.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Vaughan S, Coward JI, Bast RC, Jr, Berchuck A, Berek JS, Brenton JD, Coukos G, Crum CC, Drapkin R, Etemadmoghadam D, Friedlander M, Gabra H, Kaye SB, et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:719–25. doi: 10.1038/nrc3144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brinton LA, Sakoda LC, Sherman ME, Frederiksen K, Kjaer SK, Graubard BI, Olsen JH, Mellemkjaer L. Relationship of benign gynecologic diseases to subsequent risk of ovarian and uterine tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2929–35. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rossing MA, Cushing-Haugen KL, Wicklund KG, Doherty JA, Weiss NS. Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in relation to benign ovarian conditions and ovarian surgery. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:1357–64. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9207-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Van Gorp T, Amant F, Neven P, Vergote I, Moerman P. Endometriosis and the development of malignant tumours of the pelvis. A review of literature. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18:349–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2003.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fukunaga M, Nomura K, Ishikawa E, Ushigome S. Ovarian atypical endometriosis: its close association with malignant epithelial tumours. Histopathology. 1997;30:249–55. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1997.d01-592.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.LaGrenade A, Silverberg SG. Ovarian tumors associated with atypical endometriosis. Hum Pathol. 1988;19:1080–4. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(88)80090-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474:609–15. doi: 10.1038/nature10166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang D, Chen P, Zheng CH, Xia J. Identification of ovarian cancer subtype-specific network modules and candidate drivers through an integrative genomics approach. Oncotarget. 2016;7:4298–309. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6774. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sampson JA. Metastatic or Embolic Endometriosis, due to the Menstrual Dissemination of Endometrial Tissue into the Venous Circulation. Am J Pathol. 1927;3:93–110.43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Herington JL, Bruner-Tran KL, Lucas JA, Osteen KG. Immune interactions in endometriosis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2011;7:611–26. doi: 10.1586/eci.11.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chang CM, Chuang CM, Wang ML, Yang YP, Chuang JH, Yang MJ, Yen MS, Chiou SH, Chang CC. Gene Set-Based Integrative Analysis Revealing Two Distinct Functional Regulation Patterns in Four Common Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17 doi: 10.3390/ijms17081272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chang CM, Chuang CM, Wang ML, Yang MJ, Chang CC, Yen MS, Chiou SH. Gene Set-Based Functionome Analysis of Pathogenesis in Epithelial Ovarian Serous Carcinoma and the Molecular Features in Different FIGO Stages. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17 doi: 10.3390/ijms17060886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kolb R, Liu GH, Janowski AM, Sutterwala FS, Zhang W. Inflammasomes in cancer: a double-edged sword. Protein Cell. 2014;5:12–20. doi: 10.1007/s13238-013-0001-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Latz E, Xiao TS, Stutz A. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:397–411. doi: 10.1038/nri3452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Man SM, Kanneganti TD. Regulation of inflammasome activation. Immunol Rev. 2015;265:6–21. doi: 10.1111/imr.12296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lin C, Zhang J. Inflammasomes in Inflammation-Induced Cancer. Front Immunol. 2017;8:271. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Karki R, Man SM, Kanneganti TD. Inflammasomes and Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5:94–9. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gyorffy B, Lanczky A, Szallasi Z. Implementing an online tool for genome-wide validation of survival-associated biomarkers in ovarian-cancer using microarray data from 1287 patients. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2012;19:197–208. doi: 10.1530/ERC-11-0329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guo B, Fu S, Zhang J, Liu B, Li Z. Targeting inflammasome/IL-1 pathways for cancer immunotherapy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36107. doi: 10.1038/srep36107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Visser KE, Eichten A, Coussens LM. Paradoxical roles of the immune system during cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:24–37. doi: 10.1038/nrc1782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Edwards RP, Huang X, Vlad AM. Chronic inflammation in endometriosis and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: New roles for the “old” complement pathway. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4:e1002732. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2014.1002732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen DS, Mellman I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point. Nature. 2017;541:321–30. doi: 10.1038/nature21349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, Gimotty PA, Massobrio M, Regnani G, Makrigiannakis A, Gray H, Schlienger K, Liebman MN, Rubin SC, Coukos G. Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:203–13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.He A, Shao J, Zhang Y, Lu H, Wu Z, Xu Y. CD200Fc reduces LPS-induced IL-1beta activation in human cervical cancer cells by modulating TLR4-NF-kappaB and NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8:33214–24. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16596. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ponomareva L, Liu H, Duan X, Dickerson E, Shen H, Panchanathan R, Choubey D. AIM2, an IFN-inducible cytosolic DNA sensor, in the development of benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2013;11:1193–202. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eddy JA, Hood L, Price ND, Geman D. Identifying tightly regulated and variably expressed networks by Differential Rank Conservation (DIRAC) PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6:e1000792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karatzoglou A, Smola A, Hornik K, Zeileis A. kernlab - An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2004;11:1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC, Muller M. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schroder MS, Gusenleitner D, Quackenbush J, Culhane AC, Haibe-Kains B. RamiGO: an R/Bioconductor package providing an AmiGO visualize interface. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:666–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES