Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2016 Jun 13;18(12):1622–1633. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now117

Reactive astrocytes potentiate tumor aggressiveness in a murine glioma resection and recurrence model

Onyinyechukwu Okolie 1, Juli R Bago 1, Ralf S Schmid 1, David M Irvin 1, Ryan E Bash 1, C Ryan Miller 1,†,, Shawn D Hingtgen 1,†,
PMCID: PMC5791515  PMID: 27298311

Abstract

Background

Surgical resection is a universal component of glioma therapy. Little is known about the postoperative microenvironment due to limited preclinical models. Thus, we sought to develop a glioma resection and recurrence model in syngeneic immune-competent mice to understand how surgical resection influences tumor biology and the local microenvironment.

Methods

We genetically engineered cells from a murine glioma mouse model to express fluorescent and bioluminescent reporters. Established allografts were resected using image-guided microsurgery. Postoperative tumor recurrence was monitored by serial imaging, and the peritumoral microenvironment was characterized by histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Coculture techniques were used to explore how astrocyte injury influences tumor aggressiveness in vitro. Transcriptome and secretome alterations in injured astrocytes was examined by RNA-seq and Luminex.

Results

We found that image-guided resection achieved >90% reduction in tumor volume but failed to prevent both local and distant tumor recurrence. Immunostaining for glial fibrillary acidic protein and nestin showed that resection-induced injury led to temporal and spatial alterations in reactive astrocytes within the peritumoral microenvironment. In vitro, we found that astrocyte injury induced transcriptome and secretome alterations and promoted tumor proliferation, as well as migration.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a unique syngeneic model of glioma resection and recurrence in immune-competent mice. Furthermore, this model provided insights into the pattern of postsurgical tumor recurrence and changes in the peritumoral microenvironment, as well as the impact of injured astrocytes on glioma growth and invasion. A better understanding of the postsurgical tumor microenvironment will allow development of targeted anticancer agents that improve surgery-mediated effects on tumor biology.

Keywords: glioblastoma, glioma, migration, reactive astrocytosis, recurrence


Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and aggressive primary brain tumor and portends a poor prognosis.1,2 The current clinical treatment regimen involves surgical resection followed by chemo- and radiotherapy.35 However, these treatments fail to prevent tumor recurrence, and median survival remains only 12–15 months.3,6 As surgical resection is central to clinical care, a clear understanding of the postsurgical environment and the role that surgery-induced changes play in mediating tumor response to treatment is vital. It is known that resection mediates pathological changes to residual tumor cells that include increased proliferation as well as enhanced invasion.7,8 Additionally, surgery-related changes to the tumor microenvironment have been implicated in reduced effectiveness of local intracavity chemotherapy.9 Temporal analysis of clinical tissue samples would facilitate the study of these phenomena, yet the rates of surgery-related mortality are low for brain cancer patients, and few clinical tissue samples are available for analysis.10 This makes the use of animal models a necessity, but the mainstay of preclinical GBM models remains solid orthotopic human xenografts that fail to incorporate surgical tumor resection.11 Thus, preclinical models of GBM resection/recurrence are needed to understand the postoperative tumor environment and how it may contribute to tumor progression, regrowth, or treatment failure.

Previously, we created an image-guided surgical model of glioma resection and recurrence in mice.8,9 In this model, surgical resection of intracranial human GBM xenografts is guided by intraoperative fluorescence imaging. Pre- and postoperative multimodality imaging revealed that this approach allowed removal of ∼92% of the primary mass, followed by rapid recurrence of residual GBM cells that displayed a faster growth rate and altered blood-vessel density compared with nonresected tumors. Although beneficial, this model fails to address several key aspects of clinical GBM resection. First, the use of human xenografts in immune-depleted animals has left the role of the immune system entirely unexplored. Immune cells within the tumor microenvironment are known to release soluble factors that regulate GBM growth, migration, and angiogenesis.1214 After treatment, tumor cells are thought to hijack components of the host immune system and utilize these cells to mediate resistance to chemotherapy and apoptosis, increasing malignant tumor progression.15,16 Secondly, our initial studies employed U87 and other established GBM cell lines. While the genetics of these extensively cultured cells vastly differ from their surgical counterparts, these lines also fail to recapitulate many histological hallmarks of GBM, such as the infiltrative growth pattern observed in human patients.11,17

We have recently described a new genetically engineered murine model of GBM in which key signaling pathways were targeted specifically to astrocytes.1820 These tumor cells, which we call TRP, were transformed from cultured astrocytes by inducing aberrations in 3 of the most commonly mutated GBM networks by inactivating the retinoblastoma protein family of G1/S cell cycle proteins (T), activating the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (R), and inactivating the phosphatase and tensin homolog tumor suppressor gene (P). Injection of TRP astrocytes into syngeneic, immune-competent hosts generates GBM that exhibits infiltrative growth patterns and recapitulates aspects of the clinical disease. Engineered TRP allograft models accurately recapitulate the full range of histological traits seen in clinical GBM, including elevated mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, and necrosis. Inoculation of TRP within an immune-competent host enables both the innate and acquired immune systems present to interact with the tumor microenvironment, features that cannot be recapitulated in immune-depleted human xenograft models. Together, these features suggest that image-guided microsurgery of TRP allografts could be used to develop more accurate models of GBM.

In this study, we utilized TRP astrocytes to create a novel model of GBM resection/recurrence in immune-competent hosts and sought to characterize the key pathological features of the postoperative surgical cavity. We engineered the TRP model system with optical reporters to allow for microsurgical visualization, real-time monitoring of tumor growth, and assessment of the biological consequences of tumor resection. We used bioluminescence imaging and histology to monitor the pattern of postsurgical tumor recurrence, with a specific focus on local tumor growth within the resection cavity, as well as distant growth by invasive tumor cells. Finally, we used immunohistochemistry and in vitro coculture techniques to investigate dynamic changes in the reactive astrocyte component of the tumor microenvironment. We found that surgery induces a phenotypic switch in reactive astrocytes into a more primitive cell type. Using a model that mimics the in vivo astrocyte response to surgical trauma and astrocytes isolated from the in vivo resection model, we found that injury to astrocytes promotes tumor proliferation and migration in vitro. Additionally, through transcriptome and secretome analysis, we revealed that Cxcl5 may play a key role in this effect. This suggests that traumatic brain injury induced by tumor resection alters the local microenvironment and that injured astrocytes may impact the aggressiveness of GBM cells adjacent to the surgical cavity.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture

TRP, GL261, U251, and U87 cells were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 in complete medium consisting of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma) and penicillin/streptomycin (100 µg/mL; Sigma), as described.20

Fluorescent-Guided Microsurgical Resection

TRP–mCherry-FLuc (mcF) allografts were formed by intracranial tumor inoculation in C57BL/6 mice and established for 14 days. Cranial windows were created to aid visualization of fluorescent tumor and allow for tumor removal. TRP-mcF allografts were surgically excised under fluorescence microscopy using a combination of aspiration and microsurgical dissection. Bioluminescent imaging (BLI) was used pre-resection, immediately post-resection, and at serial time points postsurgery to determine extent of resection and growth of recurrent tumors. Postsurgical mouse brains harvested at various time points were characterized using histology and immunohistochemistry to observe patterns of tumor recurrence and determine pathological consequences of resection. Animal studies were approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Cell Growth and Migration In vitro

Glioma cells (TRP-mcF, GL261, U87, U251), immortalized astrocytes, and astrocytes derived from the in vivo resection model were seeded separately into adjacent wells located 0.5 mm apart in 2-chamber culture inserts (Ibidi), placed in microwell dishes (MatTek) or 24-well plates, and incubated overnight in complete media. Culture inserts were removed and astrocytes were either scratch injured or left uninjured. Cells were imaged over 24 h for migration. To assess proliferation, 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) was pulsed into culture medium at 24 h for 2 h. ImageJ was used to perform analysis.

To assess proliferation of TRP-mcF cells by bioluminescence, immortalized astrocytes were grown in 24-well plates, and cells were either scratched or left untreated. Twenty-four hours later, the scratch astrocyte conditioned medium (SACM) or control astrocyte conditioned medium (ACM) was collected. Cell proliferation was measured by BLI using an IVIS Kinetic (PerkinElmer).

Fluorescence Immunocytochemistry In vitro

To investigate the impact of astrocyte injury on nestin and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression in vitro, immortalized astrocytes were seeded in 24-well plates. Cells were formalin fixed and incubated with GFAP or nestin primary antibodies and dye-conjugated secondary antibodies as previously described.21

Bioluminescent Imaging and Survival Analysis

Pre-resection tumor volumes were monitored by BLI using an IVIS Kinetic. Surgery was performed on day 14 and tumor recurrence was monitored. Mice were monitored for neurological symptoms and sacrificed upon their development. Survival analysis was performed as previously described.8

Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry

Allograft mice were resected at day 14 after cell injection and randomized for sacrifice at days 1, 3, 5, and 7 post-resection. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded brain sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and Iba-1 immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described.22

RNA-Seq Analyses

Total RNA was extracted from injured or uninjured astrocyte cell pellets using the Qiagen RNeasy kit, followed by library preparation using a Stranded mRNA-seq Kit (Kapa Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. High-throughput sequencing with 75-bp single-end reads was performed on a NextSeq500 using the Illumina High Output Kit and analyzed as previously described.23,24

Luminex Analysis

Protein levels in the supernatant of injured or uninjured astrocytes were determined using a mouse magnetic Luminex screening assay (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Each sample was prepared in a 24-well plate as described above. Medium from each well was collected and used for protein analysis.

Supplementary Materials

Additional materials and methods are detailed in the Supplement. Supplementary figures and videos can also be found online.

Results

Fluorescence-Guided Microsurgery Effectively Reduces Orthotopic TRP Allograft Burden but Fails to Prevent Rapid Tumor Recurrence

We infected murine TRP cells with a recombinant lentiviral vector encoding mcF (TRP-mcF) to facilitate high-resolution fluorescence imaging–guided microsurgical tumor resection and noninvasive BLI to quantify tumor volumes (Fig. 1A–D). Fluorescence imaging confirmed mCherry expression (Fig. 1B and D). TRP-mcF cells showed a small but statistically significant decrease in growth compared with uninfected TRP cells (Fig. 1E). Dilution assays revealed that the luciferase activity of TRP-mcF correlated directly with cell number in vitro (Fig. 1F).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

TRP cells engineered to express mCherry and luciferase proliferate in vitro and form GBM allografts in vivo. Cultured TRP glioma cells transduced with lentiviral vectors encoding TRP-mcF express mCherry and luciferase in vitro as determined by (A and C) white light and (B and D) fluorescence imaging. TRP-mcF cells (doubling time 1.1 days) showed a small but statistically significant decrease in growth compared with uninfected TRP cells (doubling time 0.9 days, P = .01) (E). TRP-mcF cell number showed linear correlation with Fluc activity (R2 = .998, P < .0001) (F). TRP-mcF allografts showed exponential growth with a doubling time of 3.3 days in vivo by BLI (G). Representative H&E staining (H and J–M) and mCherry fluorescence imaging (I) of brain sections show large intracortical tumors 14 days after injection of TRP-mcF cells. Tumors showed histopathological features of GBM, including microvascular proliferation (black arrowheads), an invasive brain-tumor interface (white arrow), and elevated mitotic activity (white arrowheads). Original magnifications: 15x (H and I), 40x (A and B), 100x (C, D, and J), 200x (K), 400x (L), and 600x (M). Scale bars, 100 µm (A–D) and 200 µm (J–M).

We have previously shown that TRP allografts develop the histopathological hallmarks of human gliomas18 and progress to GBM 15–20 days after orthotopic cell injection.20 Similar to the parental line, serial BLI showed that engineered TRP-mcF allografts developed into rapidly expanding tumors over 24 days in the parenchyma of C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 1G). Fluorescence and histological analysis of postmortem tissue sections confirmed the presence of large TRP-mcF tumors 14 days after injection (Fig. 1H and I). These tumors contained abundant microvascular proliferation and elevated mitotic activity (Fig. 1J–M) but generally lacked necrosis at this time point. These results demonstrate that TRP glioma cells engineered to express mCherry and luciferase develop the histopathological hallmarks of human GBM.

Our previous microsurgical resection model using U87 cells failed to recapitulate important hallmarks of clinical GBM, including a full immune system and brain invasion.8 We have previously shown that TRP-mcF allografts diffusely invade the brain parenchyma when established in syngeneic, immunocompetent mice.20 We therefore examined whether fluorescence-guided microsurgery could be used to resect TRP-mcF allografts that accurately reflect the brain-invasive phenotype of human GBM in immune-competent C57 hosts. Fourteen days after intracortical injection of TRP-mcF cells, mCherry fluorescence was evident in the surgical field and was used to guide microsurgical dissection (Fig. 2A–D). Pre- and postoperative BLI showed that resection achieved >90% reduction in tumor burden (Fig. 2E). Histological analysis confirmed these findings, as most mice examined displayed only small residual deposits of tumor remaining near the resection cavity on postoperative day 1 (Fig. 2F and G).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fluorescence-guided microsurgical resection reduces volumes of orthotopic TRP-mcF allografts that redevelop to induce death. A scalp incision (A) was made 14 days after injection of TRP-mcF cells. A craniotomy was performed (B) to visualize the underlying mCherry+ tumors (C). Fluorescence-guided microsurgery significantly reduced tumor burden as determined by intraoperative fluorescence imaging (D). Postoperative BLI showed a 91% reduction in mean tumor burden (N = 6 mice per group, P < .0001) (E). Representative BLIs pre- and postresection are shown. Representative mCherry fluorescence (F) and H&E images (G) of brain sections taken 1 day postresection showed residual tumor (arrows) within the resection cavity (RC). Recurrent TRP-mcF allografts (H) grew faster than their pre-resection counterparts (data from Fig. 1G), with doubling times of 1.9 vs 3.3 days, respectively (P = .0003). Microsurgical resection extended survival, as resected mice survived significantly longer than nonresected mice (31 vs 21 days, log-rank P = .001) (I). Fluorescence (J) and H&E images (K) of brain sections taken 7 days postresection show recurrent tumor near the RC. Original magnifications: 15x (J and K) and 100x (F and G).

To examine the therapeutic benefit of resection, we monitored TRP-mcF growth before and after surgery using BLI. Interestingly, recurrent TRP-mcF tumors grew more rapidly than their pre-resection counterparts (Fig. 2H). Similar to clinical findings, resected mice survived significantly longer than nonresected mice but eventually succumbed from their tumor (Fig. 2I).10,25,26 Fluorescence imaging and histological examination of symptomatic, terminally aged mice confirmed the presence of recurrent mCherry+ tumors around the resection cavity (Fig. 2J and K). Taken together, these results demonstrate that fluorescence-guided microsurgery can be used to create a TRP allograft resection and recurrence model in a syngeneic immune-competent host where surgery extends the life of mice, but tumor recurrence eventually leads to death.

We next characterized the peritumoral microenvironment by performing histological analysis of tumor brains 1–7 days after resection to monitor patterns of postsurgical recurrence. Histology confirmed near-total tumor resection 1–3 days after microsurgery (Fig. 3A–H). However, despite absence of tumor at the resection cavity, tumor invasion of the deep ipsilateral hemisphere led to distant recurrence (Fig. 3I). Recurrent, mitotically active (Fig. 3J) tumors exhibited extensive migration along blood vessels (Fig. 3K) and diffusely invaded brain parenchyma (Fig. 3L). Five days after tumor microsurgery, locally recurrent tumor became apparent near the resection cavity (Fig. 3M) and was accompanied by reactive changes in the resection bed, including hemosiderin-laden macrophages and reactive astrocytes (Fig. 3N–P). After 7 days, locally recurrent tumors became large, highly mitotically active, and necrotic (Fig. 3Q–T) and diffusely invaded the adjacent brain. Local tumor recurrence was accompanied by increased reactive changes in the resection bed, including infiltration of foamy and hemosiderin-laden macrophages (Fig. 3U–X). These results suggest that fluorescence-aided microsurgery in the syngeneic TRP-mcF allograft model system recapitulates aspects of clinical GBM, including invasion and distant recurrence, a process that occurs concomitantly with reactive, surgery-induced changes in the resection cavity.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Local and distant tumor recurrences develop following microsurgical resection of TRP-mcF allografts. Representative H&E stained sections of mouse brains harvested 1 (A–D), 3 (E–L), 5 (M–P), and 7 (Q–X) days after resection of TRP-mcF allografts. Panels A–H show near-complete resection of tumor around the surgical cavity. However, extensive tumor invasion was evident in the deep ipsilateral cortex (I–L) of the mouse brain shown in E–H. Panels M–X show local recurrence of tumor within the resection cavity, but the mouse brain in Q–X also shows extensive perivascular invasion (U and V) and recurrent tumor near the ventricle (Q, arrowhead). Black arrowheads indicate the invasive brain-tumor interface (L), reactive astrocytes (P), mitoses (J, S, and T), and foamy macrophages (W) present in recurrent tumors. White (P) and black (X) arrowheads indicate hemosiderin-laden macrophages. Asterisk indicates necrosis (R, S, and T). Original magnifications: 40x (A, E, I, M, and Q), 100x (U), 200x (B, F, K, N, and R), 400x (C, G, H, J, O, S, W, and V), 600x (D, L, P, T, and X). Scale bars = 200 µm.

Microsurgery Induces Dynamic Changes in the Reactive Astrocyte Component of the Peritumoral Microenvironment Surrounding TRP-mcF Allografts

Reactive astrocytes are the main cellular component of glial scars that develop in response to a variety of pathological stimuli in the brain. During tumorigenesis, these cells play a key role in tumor progression and invasion,13,2730 where they develop hypertrophic cytoplasmic processes and upregulate expression of cytoskeletal proteins such as GFAP. Indeed, hypertrophic GFAP+ reactive astrocytes accumulated near the invasive edge of TRP-mcF allografts and became progressively dense as these tumors grew (Fig. 4A and B).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Microsurgical resection induces dynamic changes in reactive astrocytes surrounding TRP-mcF allografts. Reactive astrocytes were abundant in the peritumoral brain parenchyma in mCherry+ (red) TRP-mcF allografts established for 7 days (A), and their density increased further in tumors established for 14 days (B). Tumor cells, but not reactive astrocytes, expressed nestin (C). Over the course of 7 days following microsurgical tumor resection, a gradual decrease in the density of reactive astrocytes in the peritumoral microenvironment is highlighted by GFAP immunostaining (D–H). However, over this time course, reactive astrocytes gain expression of the stem cell marker nestin and their density peaks 3 days postresection (I–M). Double immunostaining (N–P, merge, Q) of brains 3 days postresection shows that reactive astrocytes express both GFAP (green, O) and nestin (red, P). Nuclei are stained with Hoechst (blue, I–L, N, and Q). All pairwise comparisons in panels H and M were significant except days 5 and 7 in (H) (P < .0001). Original magnifications: 100x. Scale bars = 100 µm.

In addition to tumorigenesis, reactive astrocytes are a significant component of the glial scars that develop in response to blunt force brain trauma.3135 In murine models, stab wound injury induces proliferation of GFAP+ reactive astrocytes that also express stem cell markers, such as the intermediate filament nestin.34,3638 Moreover, these cells have been shown to acquire the phenotypic properties of stem cells when cultured ex vivo, including unlimited self-renewal and multilineage differentiation.36,37 To determine whether the reactive astrocytes that accompanied TRP-mcF allograft growth might undergo a similar change in phenotype, we performed nestin immunostaining on established tumors. In contrast to their abundant GFAP immunoreactivity, reactive astrocytes around the invasive edge of TRP-mcF allografts did not express nestin, suggesting they lacked stemlike properties (Fig. 4C).

To examine the effects of blunt force trauma induced by microsurgical resection on reactive astrocytes in the peritumoral microenvironment, mouse brains harvested 1–7 days after resection were also immunostained for GFAP and nestin. A dramatic decrease in the number of GFAP+ reactive astrocytes was evident over this time course (Fig. 4D–H). Few of these cells expressed nestin at postoperative day 1 (Fig. 4I). However, reactive astrocytes that coexpressed both GFAP and nestin (Fig. 4N–Q) increased 16-fold by day 3 and gradually decreased thereafter (Fig. 4J–M). These results suggest that the blunt force trauma induced by resection alters the reactive astrocytes present in the peritumoral microenvironment and may induce a stem cell–like phenotype in these cells.36,37

Because recurrent tumors grew faster than their pre-resection counterparts (Fig. 2H) and diffusely infiltrated the brain (Fig. 3), we next used cell culture to explore whether astrocyte injury influences tumor biology in vitro. Scratch injury of cultured astrocytes is an established in vitro model that mimics the blunt force trauma induced by surgical resection. Cultured astrocytes injured by scratching have been shown to undergo a phenotypic switch to a stem cell–like state accompanied by increased nestin expression.3942 We confirmed that scratch injury of immortalized astrocytes induces a 2.5-fold increase in nestin expression within 24 h (Fig. 5A and B). Next, we examined the effects of astrocyte injury on TRP-mcF cell migration and proliferation using a coculture system (Fig. 5C). In contrast to the effects of uninjured astrocytes, scratch injury of immortalized astrocytes induced a 2.5-fold increase in migration of cocultured TRP-mcF cells over 24 h (Fig. 5D–F). Astrocytes isolated from the in vivo resection model (Supplementary Fig. S1) increased TRP-mcF cell migration compared with uninjured astrocytes but showed no difference relative to injured astrocytes (Fig. 5E). In vitro injury to astrocytes derived directly from the in vivo model did not increase TRP-mcF migration further. Single cell analysis (Fig. 5F) showed the TRP-mcF cells cultured with injured astrocytes migrated faster (Fig. 5G), farther (Supplementary Fig. S2A), and more directly toward injured astrocytes (Supplementary Fig. S2B) than those cultured with uninjured astrocytes. These effects were specific to astrocyte injury, as scratch wounding of TRP-mcF cells themselves had no effect on their migration, in both the presence (Supplementary Fig. S3A) and absence of injured astrocytes (Supplementary Fig. S3B). Revealing the broad applicability of this effect, astrocyte injury increased migration in established GBM mouse (GL261) and human (U251 and U87) cell lines in vitro (Fig. 5H).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Astrocyte injury promotes TRP migration and proliferation in vitro. Compared with cultured, uninjured astrocytes (A), scratch wounding induces significant increases in nestin (green) expression at 24 h (2.5-fold increase, P < .0001) (B). Astrocytes and TRP were seeded approximately 500 µm apart and groups were constructed with and without scratch injury of each cell population (C). Time-lapse images were captured every 20 min for 24 h and used to construct movies that revealed the migration of TPRs in real time. Injuring astrocytes by scratch induced significantly increased migration of TRP-mcF tumor cells at 24 h (P < .0001) (D and E). Astrocytes isolated from the in vivo injury model (ExAC uninjured) increased the migration of TRP cells (P = .0002) and injury in vitro (ExAC injured) did not alter migration further (P = .3) (E). Single cell imaging analysis showed that injury of cocultured astrocytes (F) increased the velocity (P < .0001) (G) of individual TRP-mcF tumor cells. Astrocyte injury induced increased migration in established GL261 (P < .0001), U251 (P < .0001), and U87 (P < .0001) GBM cell lines (H). Compared with uninjured astrocytes, scratch injury of immortalized astrocytes increased proliferation of cocultured TRP-mcF tumor cells 32% as measured by EdU incorporation at 24 h (P < .0001) (I). TRP-mcF cell proliferation was significantly increased when cultured in scratch injured-astrocyte conditioned media (SACM) compared with uninjured astrocyte conditioned media (ACM) as measured by BLI (doubling time: 1.07 vs 1.19 days, P = .02) (J). Scratch injury of astrocytes significantly increased proliferation of GL261 (P = .0006), U251 (P < .0001), and U87 (P = .034) GBM cell lines (K). Original magnification: 100x. Scale bars = 100 µm.

To examine the effects of astrocyte injury on TRP-mcF proliferation, we cocultured these cells with uninjured and injured astrocytes and monitored their proliferation by labeling S-phase cells with EdU. Compared with uninjured astrocytes, scratch injury of astrocytes induced significantly more TRP-mcF cells to enter S phase after 24 h of coculture (Fig. 5I and Supplementary Fig. S4A and B). Moreover, culturing TRP-mcF cells with the conditioned media of injured astrocytes increased their proliferation as determined by BLI (Fig. 5J). Injured astrocytes increased proliferation in both established GBM mouse and human cell lines relative to uninjured astrocytes (Fig. 5K). Taken together, these data suggest that the blunt force trauma induced by surgical resection produces changes in the reactive astrocyte component of the peritumoral microenvironment that may promote tumor migration and proliferation.

To identify the factors that contribute to the observed tumor proliferation and migration induced by astrocyte injury, we performed RNA-seq analysis on cultured astrocytes before and after scratch injury. Differential gene expression analysis (Fig. 6A) and hierarchical clustering (Fig. 6B and Supplementary Fig. S5) revealed significant alterations to the astrocyte transcriptome after scratch injury. We found that injured astrocytes exhibited upregulation of genes involved in cytokine production and response (Fig. 6C). Based on RNA-seq analysis, we identified 5 candidates that were upregulated and known to encode secreted proteins (Cxcl5, Il33, Tnfsf12, Tnfsf13, and Vegfa). Four of these candidates (Cxcl5, Il33, Tnfsf12, and Vegfa) were examined using Luminex assays, which showed that only Cxcl5 was upregulated in the supernatants of injured astrocytes (1.42-fold, P = .0074; Fig. 6D). These data suggest that Cxcl5 may contribute to increased tumor proliferation and migration following astrocyte injury.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Astrocyte injury induces transcriptome and secretome changes. Differential expression analysis (A) and hierarchical clustering showed that scratch injury of astrocytes (S1–S4) induced significant transcriptome alterations (2093 genes, q < 0.001) compared with uninjured (C1–C4) astrocytes (B). Ontology analysis of upregulated genes revealed enrichment in genes associated with cytokine production and response (C). Compared with uninjured astrocytes, astrocyte injury increased secretion of Cxcl5 (P = .0074) (D) as measured by Luminex analysis.

Discussion

Surgical resection followed by radio- and chemotherapy is the standard of care for GBM patients. Nonetheless, these treatments ultimately fail because they are unable to reach the invasive cancer cells that evade surgical resection and lie outside radiation fields.10,25,26 As a result, local and regional therapies that penetrate the brain have proven effective, specifically controlled-release polymers. Others, such as convection-enhanced drug delivery and cell-based therapies, hold further promise when used as an adjunct to surgical resection. However, their promise has yet to be clinically realized due to the current lack of accurate preclinical models in which to test these therapies. To address this gap, we developed a syngeneic, immunocompetent mouse model of GBM that mimics the clinical scenario of surgical resection and accurately recapitulates the invasive nature of the human disease.18,20

Surgical resection remains one of the most widely used, yet least studied components of GBM therapy. Many of the pathophysiological events following tumor resection remain unknown, emphasizing the need for a clinically relevant preclinical model. Previous models have used human U87 xenografts that fail to recapitulate important GBM features, such as brain invasion.8,9,11 In this current study, we developed a resection model that uses glioma cells that mimic clinical hallmarks of human GBM in syngeneic immune-competent hosts and exhibits one of the most important GBM features, brain invasion. This biologically faithful mouse model allowed us to uncover potential mechanisms of tumor progression following tumor resection. Thus, this resection model can help provide a better understanding of the pathophysiological consequences of surgical resection.

Reactive astrocytes are recruited to the local microenvironment in response to an assortment of pathological stimuli, such as tumor growth13,36,43 and blunt force trauma.32,33,38,4446 The pattern of reactive astrocytosis after blunt force trauma in the CNS has been heavily studied. After cortical stab wound injury, astrocytes react by hypertrophy and upregulation of nestin and GFAP, and subsequently dedifferentiate into multipotent cells.34,36,37 Since glioma resection models are rare, it was unclear how reactive astrocytes in the peritumoral microenvironment would react following traumatic brain injury induced by surgical tumor resection. We found that reactive astrocytes express nestin following resection, suggesting that these astrocytes dedifferentiate in response to surgical tumor resection. One potential weakness of this study is that we used marker expression, instead of ex vivo functional analysis, to suggest astrocyte dedifferentiation. However, in a similar context, reports have already shown that traumatic brain injury causes astrocytes to acquire stem cell features, including neurosphere formation, self-renewal, and multilineage potential.36,37

As a prevalent component of the glioma microenvironment, reactive astrocytes play a major role in tumor progression and invasion.12,28,29,47,48 Since our data suggest that these astrocytes dedifferentiate in response to surgical resection, we further extended these findings by investigating how this response may influence tumor biology, specifically tumor growth and migration. Using an in vitro model that mimics the in vivo astrocyte response to injury,3942,49 we found that the astrocyte response promotes tumor proliferation and migration, suggesting that reactive astrocytes may potentiate tumor aggressiveness after resection. Moreover, we found that recurrent tumors are highly invasive and exhibited significantly faster growth compared with their nonresected counterparts. Since in vitro tumor growth showed a marginal increase compared with the in vivo response, this suggests that reactive astrocytes may be only a contributing factor in promotion of the increased proliferation of recurrent tumors. Although tumor growth and proliferation are more straightforward to monitor, it is difficult to assess in vivo tumor invasion due to mass effects from the malignant tumor. Therefore, surgical tumor resection provided a unique opportunity to study tumor cell invasion. While it is challenging to compare the invasion of pre- versus postoperative tumors, we found that recurrent tumors extensively invaded the brain. Moreover, surgical intervention alters the reactive astrocyte composition within the tumor microenvironment and may have deleterious consequences on patient survival. While glioma resection remains the standard of care in qualified patients, this report highlights the role of reactive astrocytes in inducing a more favorable microenvironment for tumor regrowth and recurrence. This suggests that our model may provide the means to further understand how the postsurgical microenvironment influences tumor properties and allows for the development of drugs to combat resection-mediated effects. Our data suggest that Cxcl5 contributes to increased tumor invasion and proliferation after GBM resection, but further experimentation is needed to fully characterize and identify the factors responsible for in vivo response. We are currently exploring these molecular mechanisms.

Microglia/macrophages are likely to play an important role in the postsurgical microenvironment as tissue scavengers and may potentiate the aggressiveness of recurrent tumors.13,50,51 These cells have been implicated in glioma pathogenesis and may promote a tumor-permissive microenvironment.5254 We found that recurrent tumors exhibited a significant increase in Iba-1+ cells in the tumor compared with pre-resection (Supplementary Fig. S6). This suggests that microglia/macrophages may play a role in the increased tumor migration and/or proliferation observed after resection.

Surgery alters the tumor microenvironment, which is largely composed of reactive astrocytes. The microenvironment in established nonresected tumors contains a high tumor-to–reactive astrocyte ratio, while, after tumor resection, recurrent tumors harbor a much lower proportion. Though surgery manipulates the microenvironment, it remains unclear how this affects local treatment strategies such as stem cell therapies. Engineered stem cells extensively home to glioma cells and have shown therapeutic efficacy55,56—though, in a similar context, implanting stem cells within a CNS lesion has been shown to reduce stem cell survival, alter differentiation, and decrease therapeutic efficacy.9,57 However, the molecular mechanism and signals associated with this response remain unclear. To better develop stem cell therapies, we are currently investigating the underlying mechanisms that reduce stem cell efficacy in the postsurgical tumor microenvironment.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates the development of a new glioma resection model in syngeneic immune-competent hosts that allowed us to study the postsurgical microenvironment and pattern of tumor recurrence. We found that surgical resection alters the reactive astrocyte component of the peritumoral microenvironment and that injured astrocytes may significantly influence tumor biology. Using this study as a template, more investigations can be conducted to gain a better understanding of the postsurgical microenvironment. This will allow optimization of locally administered therapies and facilitate the development of agents that ameliorate surgery-mediated effects on tumor properties.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available at Neuro-Oncology Journal online (http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/).

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the UNC University Cancer Research Fund (to S.D.H. and C.R.M.) and the UNC Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (UL1TR001111, to O.O. and J.B.). The UNC Translational Pathology Laboratory is supported by the National Cancer Institute (P30CA016086) and the University Cancer Research Fund. The Small Animal Imaging Core in the UNC Biomedical Imaging Research Center is supported by the National Cancer Institute (P30CA016086).

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Supplementary Material

Figure S1.tif
Figure S2.tif
Figure S3.tif
Figure S4.tif
Figure S5.tif
Figure S6.tif
SV1_uninjured.avi
SV2_AC injured.avi
SV3_TRP injured.avi
SV4_both injured.avi
TRP paper Supplements v3.doc
Supplementary Data

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the UNC-Olympus Imaging Research Center for microscope usage.

References

  • 1. Adamson C, Kanu OO, Mehta AI et al. Glioblastoma multiforme: a review of where we have been and where we are going. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18(8):1061–1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wen PY, Kesari S. Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(5):492–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hou LC, Veeravagu A, Hsu AR et al. Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a review of natural history and management options. Neurosurg Focus. 2006;20(4):E5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Minniti G, De Sanctis V, Muni R et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma in elderly patients. J Neurooncol. 2008;88(1):97–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Nieder C, Grosu AL, Molls M. A comparison of treatment results for recurrent malignant gliomas. Cancer Treat Rev. 2000;26(6):397–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tejada S, Aldave G, Marigil M et al. Factors associated with a higher rate of distant failure after primary treatment for glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2014;116(1):169–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gunduz N, Fisher B, Saffer EA. Effect of surgical removal on the growth and kinetics of residual tumor. Cancer Res. 1979;39(10):3861–3865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hingtgen S, Figueiredo JL, Farrar C et al. Real-time multi-modality imaging of glioblastoma tumor resection and recurrence. J Neurooncol. 2013;111(2):153–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kauer TM, Figueiredo JL, Hingtgen S et al. Encapsulated therapeutic stem cells implanted in the tumor resection cavity induce cell death in gliomas. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(2):197–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(2):190–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. McNeill RS, Vitucci M, Wu J et al. Contemporary murine models in preclinical astrocytoma drug development. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(1):12–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hoelzinger DB, Demuth T, Berens ME. Autocrine factors that sustain glioma invasion and paracrine biology in the brain microenvironment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(21):1583–1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Charles NA, Holland EC, Gilbertson R et al. The brain tumor microenvironment. Glia. 2011;59(8):1169–1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Shiao SL, Ganesan AP, Rugo HS et al. Immune microenvironments in solid tumors: new targets for therapy. Genes Dev. 2011;25(24):2559–2572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Junttila MR, de Sauvage FJ. Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response. Nature. 2013;501(7467):346–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Huszthy PC, Daphu I, Niclou SP et al. In vivo models of primary brain tumors: pitfalls and perspectives. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14(8):979–993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Song Y, Zhang Q, Kutlu B et al. Evolutionary etiology of high-grade astrocytomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(44):17933–17938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. McNeill RS, Schmid RS, Bash RE et al. Modeling astrocytoma pathogenesis in vitro and in vivo using cortical astrocytes or neural stem cells from conditional, genetically engineered mice. J Vis Exp. 2014;(90):e51763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Vitucci M, Karpinich NO, Bash RE et al. Cooperativity between MAPK and PI3K signaling activation is required for glioblastoma pathogenesis. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(10):1317–1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bago JR, Alfonso-Pecchio A, Okolie O et al. Therapeutically engineered induced neural stem cells are tumour-homing and inhibit progression of glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Irvin DM, McNeill RS, Bash RE et al. Intrinsic astrocyte heterogeneity influences tumor growth in glioma mouse models. Brain Pathol. 2016:10.1111/bpa.12348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Schmid RS, Simon JM, Vitucci M et al. Core pathway mutations induce de-differentiation of murine astrocytes into glioblastoma stem cells that are sensitive to radiation but resistant to temozolomide. Neuro Oncol. 2016: doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hess KR. Extent of resection as a prognostic variable in the treatment of gliomas. J Neurooncol. 1999;42(3):227–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Affronti ML, Heery CR, Herndon JE 2nd et al. Overall survival of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients receiving carmustine wafers followed by radiation and concurrent temozolomide plus rotational multiagent chemotherapy. Cancer. 2009;115(15):3501–3511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Katz AM, Amankulor NM, Pitter K et al. Astrocyte-specific expression patterns associated with the PDGF-induced glioma microenvironment. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Liu L, Wu J, Ying Z et al. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 upregulates matrix metalloproteinase-9 and induces human glioma invasion. Cancer Res. 2010;70(9):3750–3759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Le DM, Besson A, Fogg DK et al. Exploitation of astrocytes by glioma cells to facilitate invasiveness: a mechanism involving matrix metalloproteinase-2 and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator-plasmin cascade. J Neurosci. 2003;23(10):4034–4043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hong X, Sin WC, Harris AL et al. Gap junctions modulate glioma invasion by direct transfer of microRNA. Oncotarget. 2015;6(17):15566–15577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Rhodes KE, Moon LD, Fawcett JW. Inhibiting cell proliferation during formation of the glial scar: effects on axon regeneration in the CNS. Neuroscience. 2003;120(1):41–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(2):146–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sofroniew MV. Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32(12):638–647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Robel S, Berninger B, Gotz M. The stem cell potential of glia: lessons from reactive gliosis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(2):88–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Okada S, Nakamura M, Katoh H et al. Conditional ablation of Stat3 or Socs3 discloses a dual role for reactive astrocytes after spinal cord injury. Nat Med. 2006;12(7):829–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Buffo A, Rite I, Tripathi P et al. Origin and progeny of reactive gliosis: a source of multipotent cells in the injured brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(9):3581–3586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Shimada IS, LeComte MD, Granger JC et al. Self-renewal and differentiation of reactive astrocyte-derived neural stem/progenitor cells isolated from the cortical peri-infarct area after stroke. J Neurosci. 2012;32(23):7926–7940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Sofroniew MV, Vinters HV. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119(1):7–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Yang C, Iyer RR, Yu AC et al. Beta-catenin signaling initiates the activation of astrocytes and its dysregulation contributes to the pathogenesis of astrocytomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(18):6963–6968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Feng GD, He BR, Lu F et al. Fibroblast growth factor 4 is required but not sufficient for the astrocyte dedifferentiation. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;50(3):997–1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Gao K, Wang CR, Jiang F et al. Traumatic scratch injury in astrocytes triggers calcium influx to activate the JNK/c-Jun/AP-1 pathway and switch on GFAP expression. Glia. 2013;61(12):2063–2077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Yong RL, Yang C, Lu J et al. Cell transcriptional state alters genomic patterns of DNA double-strand break repair in human astrocytes. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Nagashima G, Suzuki R, Asai J et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of reactive astrocytes around glioblastoma: an immunohistochemical study of postmortem glioblastoma cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2002;104(2):125–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Faulkner JR, Herrmann JE, Woo MJ et al. Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2004;24(9):2143–2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Myer DJ, Gurkoff GG, Lee SM et al. Essential protective roles of reactive astrocytes in traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 10):2761–2772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sofroniew MV. Reactive astrocytes in neural repair and protection. Neuroscientist. 2005;11(5):400–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Barbero S, Bonavia R, Bajetto A et al. Stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha stimulates human glioblastoma cell growth through the activation of both extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 and Akt. Cancer Res. 2003;63(8):1969–1974. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Yang C, Rahimpour S, Yu AC et al. Regulation and dysregulation of astrocyte activation and implications in tumor formation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(22):4201–4211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Yang H, Feng GD, Olivera C et al. Sonic hedgehog released from scratch-injured astrocytes is a key signal necessary but not sufficient for the astrocyte de-differentiation. Stem Cell Res. 2012;9(2):156–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hussain SF, Yang D, Suki D et al. The role of human glioma-infiltrating microglia/macrophages in mediating antitumor immune responses. Neuro Oncol. 2006;8(3):261–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Raposo C, Schwartz M. Glial scar and immune cell involvement in tissue remodeling and repair following acute CNS injuries. Glia. 2014;62(11):1895–1904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Bettinger I, Thanos S, Paulus W. Microglia promote glioma migration. Acta Neuropathol. 2002;103(4):351–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1423–1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kennedy BC, Showers CR, Anderson DE et al. Tumor-associated macrophages in glioma: friend or foe? J Oncol. 2013;2013:486912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Aboody KS, Brown A, Rainov NG et al. Neural stem cells display extensive tropism for pathology in adult brain: evidence from intracranial gliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(23):12846–12851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Ehtesham M, Kabos P, Gutierrez MA et al. Induction of glioblastoma apoptosis using neural stem cell-mediated delivery of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Cancer Res. 2002;62(24):7170–7174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Widestrand A, Faijerson J, Wilhelmsson U et al. Increased neurogenesis and astrogenesis from neural progenitor cells grafted in the hippocampus of GFAP-/- Vim-/- mice. Stem Cells. 2007;25(10):2619–2627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1.tif
Figure S2.tif
Figure S3.tif
Figure S4.tif
Figure S5.tif
Figure S6.tif
SV1_uninjured.avi
SV2_AC injured.avi
SV3_TRP injured.avi
SV4_both injured.avi
TRP paper Supplements v3.doc
Supplementary Data
Download video file (4.6MB, avi)
Download video file (6.1MB, avi)
Download video file (4MB, avi)
Download video file (5.6MB, avi)

Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES