Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology
. 2018 Feb 5;28(2):99–104. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170018

Baseline Profile of Participants in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS)

Takehiro Michikawa 1, Hiroshi Nitta 1, Shoji F Nakayama 1, Shin Yamazaki 1, Tomohiko Isobe 1, Kenji Tamura 1, Eiko Suda 1, Masaji Ono 1, Junzo Yonemoto 1, Miyuki Iwai-Shimada 1, Yayoi Kobayashi 1, Go Suzuki 1, Toshihiro Kawamoto 1,2; the Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group*
PMCID: PMC5792233  PMID: 29093304

Abstract

Background

The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS), known as Ecochil-Chosa in Japan, is a nationwide birth cohort study investigating the environmental factors that might affect children’s health and development. We report the baseline profiles of the participating mothers, fathers, and their children.

Methods

Fifteen Regional Centres located throughout Japan were responsible for recruiting women in early pregnancy living in their respective recruitment areas. Self-administered questionnaires and medical records were used to obtain such information as demographic factors, lifestyle, socioeconomic status, environmental exposure, medical history, and delivery information. In the period up to delivery, we collected bio-specimens, including blood, urine, hair, and umbilical cord blood. Fathers were also recruited, when accessible, and asked to fill in a questionnaire and to provide blood samples.

Results

The total number of pregnancies resulting in delivery was 100,778, of which 51,402 (51.0%) involved program participation by male partners. Discounting pregnancies by the same woman, the study included 95,248 unique mothers and 49,189 unique fathers. The 100,778 pregnancies involved a total of 101,779 fetuses and resulted in 100,148 live births. The coverage of children in 2013 (the number of live births registered in JECS divided by the number of all live births within the study areas) was approximately 45%. Nevertheless, the data on the characteristics of the mothers and children we studied showed marked similarity to those obtained from Japan’s 2013 Vital Statistics Survey.

Conclusions

Between 2011 and 2014, we established one of the largest birth cohorts in the world.

Key words: profile, pregnant women, environmental chemicals, birth cohort, Japan

INTRODUCTION

Publicity surrounding diseases caused by environmental pollution, such as Minamata disease (mercury poisoning) and Itai-Itai disease (cadmium poisoning),1 ensures that most people know of the detrimental effects on health of highly concentrated chemicals. Japan is not as heavily polluted with such chemicals as it once was, but chemicals are still widely used; discussions now center on the effects of less concentrated chemicals in the environment on human health. The effects of environmental pollution on children’s health, in particular, is of international concern, and the topic has been discussed at the G7/G8 Environment Ministers’ Meeting.2 In response, the Japanese Ministry of the Environment proposed a nationwide birth cohort study involving 100,000 mother-child pairs (and fathers, if accessible), and the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS; Ecochil-Chosa in Japanese) was launched in 2011 to evaluate the effects of exposure to chemicals during the fetal stage and in early childhood on children’s health and development; follow-up is planned until the children are 13 years of age.3 Several secondary studies using data on approximately 10,000 women who gave birth in 2011 (the first year of recruitment) have already been published in peer-reviewed journals.410

Recruitment for the study was closed in March 2014, and the birth data were finalized for processing. This paper summarizes the baseline profiles of all participants (mothers, children, and fathers) at the start of the program.

METHODS

Study participants

Details of the JECS concept and design have been published elsewhere.3 Briefly, JECS is funded directly by Japan’s Ministry of the Environment and involves collaboration between the Programme Office (National Institute for Environmental Studies), the Medical Support Centre (National Centre for Child Health and Development), and 15 Regional Centres (Hokkaido, Miyagi, Fukushima, Chiba, Kanagawa, Koshin, Toyama, Aichi, Kyoto, Osaka, Hyogo, Tottori, Kochi, Fukuoka, and South Kyushu/Okinawa). Each Regional Centre determined its own study area, consisting of one or more local administrative units (cities, towns or villages) (eTable 1), and was responsible for recruiting women in early pregnancy who resided in its study area. Between January 2011 and March 2014, we contacted pregnant women via cooperating health care providers and/or local government offices issuing Maternal and Child Health Handbooks and registered those willing to participate. The women’s partners (fathers) were also approached, whenever possible, and encouraged to participate. Several Regional Centres later expanded their study areas, because they learned that significant numbers of women residing in adjacent areas gave birth at cooperating health care providers. The Fukushima Centre’s study area was expanded to include the whole of Fukushima Prefecture because of concerns over the effects on health of radioactive fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant after the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.

Assessments during pregnancy and at delivery

Questionnaires

Self-administered questionnaires, which were completed by the women during the first trimester and second/third trimester, were used to collect information on demographic factors, medical and obstetric history, physical and mental health, lifestyle, occupation, environmental exposure at home and in the workplace, housing conditions, and socioeconomic status. Most of the questionnaires were distributed to women attending prenatal examinations, but some were sent by post. Completed questionnaires were returned by hand on subsequent prenatal visits or by post. When possible, those who gave incomplete answers were interviewed face-to-face or by telephone. Additionally, the mothers were interviewed about drug use before and during pregnancy.

Between the mothers’ early pregnancy and 1 month after delivery, their male partners were asked to complete a questionnaire covering demographic factors, medical history, physical and mental health, lifestyle, occupation, and environment exposure at home and in the workplace. The survey method was the same as that for the mothers.

Medical record transcriptions

Following standard operating procedures, physicians, midwives/nurses, and/or research coordinators transcribed relevant information (medical history, including gravidity and related complications; parity; maternal anthropometry; and infant physical examinations) from medical records.

Bio-specimens

Bio-specimens (blood, urine, hair, and umbilical cord blood) were collected during pregnancy and at delivery, and were stored in −80°C freezers, liquid nitrogen tanks, or ordinary-temperature under controlled temperature and humidity. Detailed information about these bio-specimens will be published separately.

Ethical issues

The Ministry of the Environment’s Institutional Review Board on Epidemiological Studies, and the Ethics Committees of all participating institutions approved the JECS protocol. All participating mothers and fathers had provided written informed consent.

Statistical analysis

In this paper, we summarized the following characteristics. Maternal profiles, including age, marital status, family composition, and passive smoking (presence of smokers at home), were obtained from the first trimester questionnaire. Information on educational background and household income was collected from the second/third trimester questionnaire. Questions about smoking habits, alcohol consumption (based on the question used in the Japan Public Health Centre-based prospective Study for the Next Generation [JPHC-NEXT]),11 and occupation in early pregnancy (based on the 2009 Japan Standard Occupational Classification)12 were included in both questionnaires, so data obtained from the first trimester questionnaire was supplemented with data from the second/third trimester questionnaire.4 When a participant chose “workers not classifiable by occupation” in the occupation section and then specified an occupation in the comment box, we chose an appropriate job category for that person. Such information as pre-pregnancy height and weight (used for calculating body mass index [BMI] as weight [kg]/height squared [m2]), and parity was primarily taken from medical records. When required data were missing from the medical records, questionnaire data were used.

We also summarized profile data on male partners (fathers) via questionnaire: their age and their occupation during their partner’s early pregnancy, along with smoking habits, alcohol consumption, BMI, and educational background (as reported by the female partners). Profile data from medical record on the children were summarized, including delivery information (live birth or not, singleton or multiple birth, gestational age at birth, sex, type of delivery) and anthropometry at birth.

The present study is based on the dataset of jecs-ag-20160424, which was released in June 2016. The birth information in this dataset is not supplemented by any information from the national Vital Statistics Survey. The participants’ profiles were processed in aggregate and also separately for each of the 15 Regional Centres. All analyses were performed with Stata 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

RESULTS

A JECS cohort flow chart from enrolment to delivery is shown in Figure 1. The study covers a total of 103,099 pregnancies. Excluding the 2,321 pregnancies with no subsequent delivery record, we were left with 100,778 pregnancies resulting in delivery, of which 51,402 (51.0%) involved program participation by male partners. Discounting pregnancies by the same woman, the study involved 95,248 unique mothers and 49,189 unique fathers. The 100,778 pregnancies involved 101,779 fetuses and resulted in 100,148 live births, 291 stillbirths (fetal deaths occurring at ≥22 weeks of gestation), and 1,340 miscarriages. It is difficult to accurately assess the coverage of the children (the number of live births registered in JECS divided by the number of all live births within the study areas) for the entire study period because we recruited women in early pregnancy and later expanded the study areas. In 2013, when recruitment was largely stabilized, however, the child coverage was approximately 45%.

Figure 1. A Japan Environment and Children’s Study cohort flow chart from enrolment to delivery.

Figure 1.

Table 1 shows the response rates of the mothers, fathers, and children for each survey item. The questionnaire and medical record response rates were nearly 100%. The response rates for maternal blood and urine sampling were higher in the second/third trimesters (95.4% for blood and 95.6% for urine) than in the first trimester (88.7% and 88.5%, respectively), mainly because approximately 8% of the pregnancies were registered during the second/third trimesters. Since the first trimester questionnaire was also given to these late participants, its response rate was 98.5%. Although we prioritized the storage of cord blood samples in public cord blood banks, the samples collected from the mothers represented 87.3% of the pregnancies surveyed.

Table 1. The response rates of the mothers, fathers, and children for each survey item.

  1st trimester 2nd/3rd trimester Birth



n % n % n %
Mother (100,778 pregnancies)
 Questionnaire and interview about drug use 99,300 98.5 97,969 97.2    
 Medical record transcription 100,611 99.8     100,778 100
 Blood 89,434 88.7 96,098 95.4 94,985 94.3
 Urine 89,190 88.5 96,341 95.6    
 Hair         Xa  
Father (51,402 with pregnant partners)
 Questionnaire 50,014 97.3b        
 Blood 49,661 96.6b        
Child (n = 101,779)
 Medical record transcription         101,779 100
 Cord blood         88,009 87.3c
 Blood         Xa  

aWe have not yet evaluated the data.

bBetween the mother’s early pregnancy and 1 month after delivery, we distributed a questionnaire to fathers, and collected blood from them.

cResponse rate of 100,778 pregnancies.

Baseline profiles of the mothers (mean age at delivery, 31.2; standard deviation [SD], 5.1) are shown in Table 2. Most were married (95.6%) and resided with their partner (and their child[ren]) (75.1%). The proportion of those who had received at least 13 years of education was 63.7% for the mothers and 55.8% for the fathers (mother-reported). The distribution of household income peaked at 2 to <4 million Japanese-yen/year (34.6%) and 4 to <6 million yen/year (33.1%). The mothers’ most common occupations in early pregnancy were homemaker (28.8%) and professional/engineering workers (22.3%). Smokers and alcohol drinkers during early pregnancy accounted for 18.2% and 45.9%, respectively. The distribution of baseline profiles did not substantially differ between the total population (about 100,000 mothers) and the sub-population of about 50,000 mothers with male partners participating in the study.

Table 2. Baseline profiles of the mothers in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014.

Variables Total With male partners participating


Number of
valid response
n (%) Number of
valid response
n (%)
Number of pregnancies 100,778     51,402    
Age at delivery, years 100,768     51,396    
 Total, mean (SD)   100,768 31.2 (5.1)   51,396 31.1 (5.0)
 <20   893 0.9   374 0.7
 20–24   9,229 9.2   4,574 8.9
 25–29   27,686 27.5   14,604 28.4
 30–34   35,571 35.3   18,387 35.8
 35–39   22,713 22.5   11,198 21.8
 ≥40   4,676 4.6   2,259 4.4
Marital status 98,312     50,624    
 Married   94,032 95.6   49,119 97.0
 Unmarried   3,444 3.5   1,296 2.6
 Divorced/widowed   836 0.9   209 0.4
Family composition 98,123     50,521    
 One-person households   653 0.7   216 0.4
 A couple only   30,105 30.7   17,386 34.4
 A couple with their child(ren)   43,556 44.4   20,769 41.1
 A parent with his or her child(ren)   848 0.9   251 0.5
 Other households   22,961 23.4   11,899 23.6
Educational background, years 97,004     50,181    
 <10   4,704 4.8   2,072 4.1
 10–12   30,544 31.5   15,407 30.7
 13–16   60,333 62.2   31,902 63.6
 ≥17   1,423 1.5   800 1.6
Paternal educational background, years 96,387     50,064    
 <10   7,049 7.3   2,858 5.7
 10–12   35,515 36.8   18,364 36.7
 13–16   49,483 51.3   26,405 52.7
 ≥17   4,340 4.5   2,437 4.9
Household income, million Japanese-yen/year 90,596     47,226    
 <2   5,140 5.7   2,300 4.9
 2 to <4   31,311 34.6   16,222 34.4
 4 to <6   29,942 33.1   15,915 33.7
 6 to <8   14,410 15.9   7,668 16.2
 8 to <10   5,926 6.5   3,146 6.7
 ≥10   3,867 4.3   1,975 4.2
Occupation in early pregnancy 97,935     50,506    
 Administrative and managerial workers   567 0.6   282 0.6
 Professional and engineering workers   21,857 22.3   12,060 23.9
 Clerical workers   16,432 16.8   8,569 17.0
 Sales workers   5,744 5.9   2,763 5.5
 Service workers   15,527 15.9   7,703 15.3
 Security workers   242 0.2   138 0.3
 Agriculture, forestry and fishery workers   454 0.5   235 0.5
 Manufacturing process workers   3,376 3.4   1,889 3.7
 Transport and machine operation workers   177 0.2   95 0.2
 Construction and mining workers   71 0.1   38 0.1
 Carrying, cleaning, packaging, and related workers   678 0.7   290 0.6
 Homemaker   28,225 28.8   14,246 28.2
 Others (students, inoccupation, workers not classifiable by occupation)   4,585 4.7   2,198 4.4
Smoking habits 99,053     50,897    
 Never smoked   57,444 58.0   30,268 59.5
 Ex-smokers who quit before pregnancy   23,571 23.8   12,011 23.6
 Smokers during early pregnancy   18,038 18.2   8,618 16.9
Passive smoking (presence of smokers at home)a 79,910     41,849    
 No   66,486 83.2   35,675 85.2
 Yes   13,424 16.8   6,174 14.8
Alcohol consumption 99,149     50,937    
 Never drank   34,279 34.6   17,666 34.7
 Ex-drinkers who quit before pregnancy   19,392 19.6   9,792 19.2
 Drinkers during early pregnancy   45,478 45.9   23,479 46.1
Body mass index before pregnancy 100,538     51,358    
 <18.5 kg/m2   16,272 16.2   8,066 15.7
 18.5–24.9 kg/m2   73,416 73.0   37,572 73.2
 ≥25 kg/m2   10,850 10.8   5,720 11.1
Parity 100,288     51,212    
 0   41,573 41.5   23,280 45.5
 1   38,281 38.2   18,555 36.2
 ≥2   20,434 20.4   9,377 18.3

SD, standard deviation.

aExcluding smokers during early pregnancy.

The mean age of the fathers when their partners gave birth was 32.9 (SD, 5.9) years (Table 3); 30.2% were engaged in the professional/engineering works, 47.7% had smoked during their partner’s early pregnancy, and 75.0% had drunk alcohol.

Table 3. Baseline profiles of the fathers in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014.

Variables Number of
valid response
n (%)
Number of their partner’s pregnancies 51,402    
Age when their children were born, years 51,104    
 Total, mean (SD)   51,104 32.9 (5.9)
 <20   198 0.4
 20–24   3,173 6.2
 25–29   11,659 22.8
 30–34   16,867 33.0
 35–39   12,738 24.9
 ≥40   6,469 12.7
Occupation during their partner’s early pregnancy 49,700    
 Administrative and managerial workers   2,029 4.1
 Professional and engineering workers   15,001 30.2
 Clerical workers   4,627 9.3
 Sales workers   5,366 10.8
 Service workers   5,650 11.4
 Security workers   2,065 4.2
 Agriculture, forestry and fishery workers   929 1.9
 Manufacturing process workers   6,744 13.6
 Transport and machine operation workers   2,061 4.1
 Construction and mining workers   3,413 6.9
 Carrying, cleaning, packaging, and related workers   828 1.7
 Homemaker   66 0.1
 Others (students, inoccupation, workers not classifiable
by occupation)
  921 1.9
Smoking habits 49,815    
 Never smoked   14,284 28.7
 Ex-smokers who quit before their partner’s pregnancy   11,757 23.6
 Smokers during their partner’s early pregnancy   23,774 47.7
Alcohol consumption 49,839    
 Never drank   10,588 21.2
 Ex-drinkers   1,873 3.8
 Drinkers   37,378 75.0
Body mass index 49,532    
 <18.5 kg/m2   1,797 3.6
 18.5–24.9 kg/m2   34,204 69.1
 ≥25 kg/m2   13,531 27.3

SD, standard deviation.

Table 4 shows baseline profiles of the 100,148 live births. The secondary sex ratio (male/female) was 1.05. Among the 98,259 singleton births, the mean anthropometric values at birth were weight: 3,023 (SD, 420) g, height: 48.9 (SD, 2.3) cm, head circumference: 33.2 (SD, 1.5) cm, and chest circumference: 31.8 (SD, 1.8) cm. The distributions of baseline profiles did not substantially differ between the total population (about 100,000 children) and the sub-population (about 50,000 children with participating fathers).

Table 4. Baseline profiles of the children in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014.

Variables Total With participating fathers


Number
of valid response
n   Number
of valid response
n  
Number of live births 100,148     51,539    
 Singleton births, n %   98,259 98.1   50,564 98.1
Gestational age at birth 100,148     51,539    
 Total, weeks, mean (SD)   100,148 39.2 (1.7)   51,539 39.2 (1.6)
 Preterm births (<37 weeks), n %   5,599 5.6   2,644 5.1
 Term births (37–41 weeks), n %   94,322 94.2   48,763 94.6
 Postterm births (≥42 weeks), n %   227 0.2   132 0.3
Sex 100,137     51,534    
 Male, n %   51,316 51.2   26,279 51.0
 Female, n %   48,821 48.8   25,255 49.0
Type of delivery 99,884     51,413    
 Vaginal, n %   79,783 79.9   41,212 80.2
 Caesarean, n %   20,101 20.1   10,201 19.8
Birth weight, g 100,071     51,509    
 Total, mean (SD)   100,071 3,008 (434)   51,509 3,015 (425)
 Singleton births 98,182     50,534    
  Total, mean (SD)   98,182 3,023 (420)   50,534 3,030 (410)
  Male, mean (SD)   50,312 3,065 (426)   25,779 3,074 (415)
  Female, mean (SD)   47,863 2,979 (408)   24,751 2,984 (399)
  Low birth weight, <2,500 g, n %   7,981 8.1   3,856 7.6
Birth height, cm 99,785     51,336    
 Total, mean (SD)   99,785 48.8 (2.4)   51,336 48.9 (2.3)
 Singleton births 97,912     50,368    
  Total, mean (SD)   97,912 48.9 (2.3)   50,368 49.0 (2.2)
  Male, mean (SD)   50,166 49.2 (2.3)   25,690 49.3 (2.2)
  Female, mean (SD)   47,740 48.6 (2.3)   24,675 48.7 (2.2)
Birth head circumference, cm 99,538     51,222    
 Total, mean (SD)   99,538 33.2 (1.5)   51,222 33.2 (1.5)
 Singleton births 97,692     50,265    
  Total, mean (SD)   97,692 33.2 (1.5)   50,265 33.2 (1.5)
  Male, mean (SD)   50,054 33.4 (1.5)   25,635 33.4 (1.5)
  Female, mean (SD)   47,633 33.0 (1.5)   24,627 33.0 (1.4)
Birth chest circumference, cm 99,489     51,198    
 Total, mean (SD)   99,489 31.7 (1.9)   51,198 31.7 (1.8)
 Singleton births 97,653     50,245    
  Total, mean (SD)   97,653 31.8 (1.8)   50,245 31.8 (1.8)
  Male, mean (SD)   50,034 31.9 (1.9)   25,625 31.9 (1.8)
  Female, mean (SD)   47,614 31.6 (1.8)   24,617 31.6 (1.8)

SD, standard deviation.

The baseline profiles of the mothers, fathers, and children for each Regional Centre are shown in eTable 2, eTable 3, and eTable 4.

DISCUSSION

We began registering the participants for the JECS in 2011 and completed registration in 2014, establishing one of the largest birth cohorts in the world. This paper outlines the baseline profiles of the JECS participants.

One strength of this study is that it covers the whole of Japan, from Hokkaido in the north to Okinawa in the south. Although the child coverage was approximately 45% in 2013, the selected characteristics of the mothers and children were comparable with those obtained in the national survey (Table 5).13,14 For example, the proportions of low birth weight (<2,500 g) were 8.2% for JECS in 2013 and 8.3% in the 2013 national Vital Statistics Survey.13 The fetal death rate in JECS (3.1 per 1,000 live births and fetal deaths at ≥22 weeks of gestation) was also similar to that in the national survey (3.0).13 Therefore, we think we can extrapolate the JECS results to the Japanese general population. Second, the large amount of information collected via questionnaires and/or medical records allows us to investigate the associations between environmental exposure and outcomes after controlling for many covariates, such as lifestyle and physical and social factors. Third, most of the participants provided bio-specimens during pregnancy and at delivery, which will be used to identify new substances in the environment posing health hazards and for gene analyses.

Table 5. The selected characteristics of the Japan Environment Children’s Study (JECS) and the national Vital Statistics in 2013.

  JECS
in 2013
Total population of
JECS, 2011–2014
Vital Statistics
in 201313



(%) (%) (%)
Characteristics of the mothers
 Age at delivery, years
  20–29 36.5 36.6 36.3
  30–39 57.8 57.8 57.8
 Parity
  0 41.0 41.5 a
Characteristics of the children
 Live births
  Singleton births 98.0 98.1 98.1
 Gestational age at birth, weeks
  Term births (37–41 weeks) 94.2 94.2 94.0
 Sex
  Male 51.2 51.2 51.2
  Female 48.8 48.8 48.8
 Type of delivery
  Caesarean 20.3 20.1 19.7b
 Birth weight, gc
  <2,500 8.2 8.1 8.3
  2,500 to <3,000 38.5 38.7 39.0
  3,000 to <3,500 42.2 42.1 41.8
  ≥3,500 11.2 11.1 10.9

aIn Vital Statistics,13 birth order has been reported. The proportion of first child among the number of the total births was 46.7% in 2013.

bSurveys of Medical Institutions in 2014.14

cSingleton births only.

Some weaknesses also warrant consideration. First, only about half of the eligible men participated. However, the profiles of the mothers and children did not essentially differ between the total population and the sub-population with paternal participation. Another limitation is that the majority of women were recruited after the latter half of the first trimester. Therefore, we should keep in mind that we did not cover all early miscarriages. In addition, in spite of the large sample size, it is difficult to examine the associations of environmental exposure to chemicals with rare perinatal outcomes, such as amniotic embolism, sudden infant death syndrome, and many individual congenital anomalies.

Information about JECS is available to the public at http://www.env.go.jp/chemi/ceh/. We are following up the participating children by distributing guardian-administered questionnaires every 6 months, starting when the children become 6 months of age, and we are carrying out further chemical analyses of approximately 100,000 blood samples taken from mothers during their second/third trimesters for heavy metals, including lead, cadmium, mercury, manganese, and selenium; these analyses will be completed in 2017. We will soon be able to report on any associations of exposure to heavy metals during pregnancy with pregnancy and reproductive outcomes (eg, preterm delivery, birth weight, and secondary sex ratio).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to express our gratitude to all of the JECS study participants and to the Co-operating health care providers. We also thank Ms. Masami Aya (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan) for her technical assistance in summarizing the data, and the JECS staff members for their support. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge our indebtedness to the previous principal investigator for JECS, Dr. Hiroshi Satoh (Food Safely Commission, Cabinet Office, Tokyo, Japan).

The Japan Environment and Children’s Study was funded by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. The findings and conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the above government.

Conflicts of interest: None declared.

APPENDIX A. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The following is the supplementary data related to this article:

eTable 1. Study area of each Regional Centre in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014

eTable 2. Baseline profiles of the mothers according to Regional Centres in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014

eTable 3. Baseline profiles of the fathers according to Regional Centres in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014

eTable 4. Baseline profiles of the children according to Regional Centres in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014

je-28-099-s001.pdf (103.2KB, pdf)

APPENDIX B.

Members of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) as of 2016 (principal investigator, Toshihiro Kawamoto): Hirohisa Saito (National Centre for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan), Reiko Kishi (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan), Nobuo Yaegashi (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan), Koichi Hashimoto (Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan), Chisato Mori (Chiba University, Chiba, Japan), Shuichi Ito (Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan), Zentaro Yamagata (University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan), Hidekuni Inadera (University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan), Michihiro Kamijima (Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan), Toshio Heike (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), Hiroyasu Iso (Osaka University, Suita, Japan), Masayuki Shima (Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan), Yasuaki Kawai (Tottori University, Yonago, Japan), Narufumi Suganuma (Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan), Koichi Kusuhara (University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan), and Takahiko Katoh (Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Niriagu JO (Editor-in-Chief). Encyclopedia of Environmental Health. Burlington: Elsevier; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ministry of the Environment. Communiqué—The G7 Toyama Environment Ministers’ Meeting. http://www.env.go.jp/earth/g7toyama_emm/english/_img/meeting_overview/Communique_en.pdf. Accessed 29.11.16.
  • 3.Kawamoto T, Nitta H, Murata K, et al. ; Working Group of the Epidemiological Research for Children’s Environmental Health . Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children’s study (JECS). BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):25. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Michikawa T, Nitta H, Nakayama SF, et al. ; Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group . The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS): A preliminary report on selected characteristics of approximately 10,000 pregnant women recruited during the first year of the study. J Epidemiol. 2015;25:452–458. 10.2188/jea.JE20140186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Suzuki K, Shinohara R, Sato M, et al. . Association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and birth weight: An appropriately adjusted model from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. J Epidemiol. 2016;26:371–377. 10.2188/jea.JE20150185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mizuno S, Nishigori H, Sugiyama T, et al. ; Japan Environment & Children’s Study Group . Association between social capital and the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: An interim report of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;120:132–141. 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Watanabe Z, Iwama N, Nishigori H, et al. ; Japan Environment & Children’s Study Group . Psychological distress during pregnancy in Miyagi after the Great East Japan Earthquake: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study. J Affect Disord. 2016;190:341–348. 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sakurai K, Nishigori H, Nishigori T, et al. ; Japan Environment & Children’s Study Group . Incidence of domestic violence against pregnant females after the Great East Japan Earthquake in Miyagi Prefecture: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11:216–226. 10.1017/dmp.2016.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Obara T, Nishigori H, Nishigori T, et al. ; JECS group . Prevalence and determinants of inadequate use of folic acid supplementation in Japanese pregnant women: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30:588–593. 10.1080/14767058.2016.1179273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morokuma S, Shimokawa M, Kato K, et al. ; Japan Environment & Children’s Study Group . Relationship between hyperemesis gravidarum and small-for-gestational-age in the Japanese population: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:247. 10.1186/s12884-016-1041-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yokoyama Y, Takachi R, Ishihara J, et al. . Validity of short and long self-administered food frequency questionnaires in ranking dietary intake in middle-aged and elderly Japanese in the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study for the Next Generation (JPHC-NEXT) protocol area. J Epidemiol. 2016;26:420–432. 10.2188/jea.JE20150064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Japan Standard Occupational Classification. http://www.stat.go.jp/english/index/seido/shokgyou/index-co.htm19. Accessed 29.11.16.
  • 13.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Vital Statistics 2013. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/list/81-1.html. Accessed 29.11.16.
  • 14.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Surveys of Medical Institutions 2014. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/list/79-1.html. Accessed 29.11.16.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

je-28-099-s001.pdf (103.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Japan Epidemiological Association

RESOURCES