Abstract
Studies of the molecular mechanisms involved in the formation of the albino leaf cells are important for understanding the development of chimera leaves in Ananas comosus var. bracteatus. In this study, we identified a total of 163 novel miRNAs involved in the development of complete white (CWh) and complete green (CGr) leaves using high-throughput sequencing method. The potential miRNA target genes were predicted and annotated using the NR, Swiss-Prot, GO, COG, KEGG, KOG and Pfam databases. The main biological processes regulated by miRNAs were revealed. The miRNAs which potentially play important roles in the development of the leaves and the albino of the CWh leaf cells were selected and their expression patterns were analyzed. The expression levels of nine miRNAs and their potential target genes were studied using qRT-PCR. These results will help to elucidate the functional and regulatory roles of miRNAs in the formation of the albino cells and the development of the leaves of A. comosus var. bracteatus. These data may also be helpful as a resource for studies of small RNA in other leaf color chimeric plant species.
Introduction
Ananas comosus var. bracteatus (red pineapple) is a commercially cultivated monocot plant originating from South America. It belongs to the Bromeliaceae family. While other plants in this family are valued for their fruit, the high quality silk fiber of the stem and leaves1,2, and a large number of secondary metabolites3–8, the red pineapple is cultivated commercially as an ornamental plant because of its colorful chimera leaves. The chimera leaves consist of normal green cells and albino white cells, but the chimeric character of the leaves in cultivated plants is particularly unstable. The leaf color of the regenerated plants varies significantly during tissue culture, in which only about 1% of the regenerated plants have the same chimeric character as the mother plant. Most of the regenerated plants lose their economic value due to the lack of colorful chimera leaves. In order to understand the molecular mechanism of the formation of the albino cells and the development of the leaves, we undertook transcriptome sequencing of the CGr cells and the CWh cells. The results of transcriptome sequence revealed the significant differences in transcription levels between the CGr and CWh plants, especially in those aspects that control photosynthesis, porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, and carotenoid biosynthesis9. These studies provided a frame of transcription variations between CGr and CWh plants that most likely result in the formation of the albino leaf cells. Based on these results, we could further study the regulatory roles of small RNA presumably involved in the development of albino leaves.
MicroRNAs are the short non-coding RNAs (20–24 nucleotides) that silence the expression of target genes through complementary sequence matching10. In plants, miRNAs control the expression of various genes involved in the processes of development, growth, and physiology. In particular, these include genes that encode transcription factors, stress response proteins, and other proteins11. Although the regulation of genes by miRNA is indirect, it is believed that miRNAs play important roles in plant growth and development12.
In this study, small RNA libraries were constructed at the different developmental stages of CWh and CGr leaves. 163 novel miRNAs and their potential target genes were identified by Illumina sequencing. To our knowledge, this is the first comparative miRNA high-throughput sequencing of A. comosus var. bracteatus. This study was mainly focused on revealing the expression profiles and regulation patterns of miRNAs involved in the CGr and CWh leaf development. The miRNAs which play potentially important roles in the development of the leaves and the albino of the CWh leaf cells were selected and analyzed. The expression levels of nine miRNAs and their potential target genes were detected by real-time qPCR. Our results provide a valuable resource for studying microRNA regulation involved in the leaf color formation and leaf development of A. comosus var. bracteatus.
Materials and Methods
Plant material
Complete green (GS1, GS2, GS3) and white (WS1, WS2, WS3) shoots were derived from the stem explants of chimera plants of A. comosus var. bracteatus (Fig. 1a) by tissue culture, in accordance with our previous protocol. Three developmental stages were evaluated based on the number of expanded leaves on shoots. WS1 (Fig. 1b) and GS1 (Fig. 1c) are complete white and green shoots respectively with only unexpanded leaves; WS2 (Fig. 1d) and GS2 (Fig. 1e) are complete white and green shoots respectively with four to five expanded leaves; WS3 (Fig. 1f) and GS3 (Fig. 1g) are complete white and green shoots respectively with ten to twelve expanded leaves. The leaves were collected at the above three stages, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C until analysis.
Measurement of chlorophyll and carotenoid contents
Complete green (GS1, GS2, GS3) and complete white (WS1, WS2, WS3) leaves were selected for chlorophyll and carotenoid measurements. The contents of chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations were measured using the Holm equation and the method as previously described13.
RNA extraction, small RNA library construction and sequencing
Total RNA was isolated from six samples using Trizol (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity, concentration and integrity of RNA samples was analyzed using Nanodrop, Qubit 2.0, the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer respectively in order to ensure the high quality of sample for sequencing. A total amount of 1.5 μg RNA per sample was used as input material for the RNA sample preparations. Sequencing libraries were generated using NEB Next Ultra small RNA Sample Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, USA) following manufacturer’s recommendations and index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBot Cluster Generation System using TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v4-cBot-HS (Illumia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the cluster generation, the library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform and single-end 50 nt reads were generated (Beijing Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd, Beijing, China).
Identification and bioinformatics analysis of miRNAs
Raw data (raw reads) of fastq format were firstly processed through in-house perl scripts. In this step, clean data (clean reads) were obtained by removing reads containing adapter, reads containing ploy-N and low quality reads from raw data. And reads were trimmed and cleaned by removing the sequences smaller than 18 nt or longer than 30 nt. Using Bowtie tools soft, the Clean Reads were aligned respectively with Silva database, GtRNAdb database, Rfam database and Repbase database to filter ribosomal RNA (rRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) and other ncRNA and repeats. The clean reads were mapped to genomic sequences (Acomosus_321_v3, https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html#!info?alias=Org_Acomosus_er). The miRDeep214 was used to detect the known miRNA and new miRNA by comparing with known miRNAs from miRBase.
Quantification of miRNA expression levels and identification of differentially expressed miRNA
miRNA expression levels were estimated for each sample: sRNA were mapped back onto the precursor sequence. Read count for each miRNA was obtained from the mapping results. The differentially expressed miRNA was identified by IDEG615. The rules used for identification of differentially expressed miRNA were |log2(FC)| > = 1 and FDR < = 0.01.
Prediction of miRNA target genes and function annotation
The potential target genes of sequenced miRNAs were predicted by Target Finder16. Gene function was annotated based on the following databases: Nr (NCBI non-redundant protein sequences)17; Nt (NCBI non-redundant nucleotide sequences); Pfam (Protein family)18; KOG/COG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins)19,20; Swiss-Prot (A manually annotated and reviewed protein sequence database)21; KO (KEGG Ortholog database); GO (Gene Ontology)22 and KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kaas/) database.
qRT-PCR identification of the expression levels of miRNAs and potential target genes
Total RNAs of six samples as used in transcriptome sequence were reverse transcribed into cDNA using the TURE script 1st Stand cDNA SYNTHESIS Kit (Aidlab) with miRNA specific primer (Table S1). qRT-PCR was performed using the analytikjena-qTOWER2.2 Real-Time PCR System (Germany) with SYBR® Green (DBI). PCR reactions of miRNAs were performed as follow: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, and 58 °C for 30 s. U6 gene was used as internal control. PCR reactions of potential target genes were performed at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 58 °C for 30 s. A melting curve (at 60–95 °C) was generated to check amplification specificity. Each reaction presented three biological repeats. The primers used were listed in Table S2.
Results
Chlorophyll and carotenoid content analysis of the CWh and CGr leaves among three developmental stages
The content of chlorophyll in CWh leaves is not detectable among all three developmental stages, while that in CWh leaves is significantly high, and increases gradually with the development of plants. (Fig. 2). These results confirmed that the CWh and CGr leaves were the typical presentations of the albino white cells and the normal green cells, respectively. The content of carotenoid of the CGr leaves is greatly higher than that in the CWh leaves among all three developmental stages, and it is gained gradually in both CGr and CWh leaves along the development of the plants (Fig. 2).
High-throughput small RNA sequencing of Ananas comosus var. bracteatus leaves
Our former studies had confirmed that chlorophyll in CWh leaves is significantly suppressed, and that the transcriptional pattern of CWh leaves is different from that of CGr leaves9. In order to identify miRNAs and to reveal the regulation mechanisms of gene expression in the A. comosus var. bracteatus leaves, the high-throughput sequencing of six miRNA libraries constructed from the CGr and CWh leaves at three developmental stages were performed. After filtering the low-quality reads, we obtained 16–18 million clean reads from each sample (Table S3). Among them, 5.8–7.4 million (about 35–45%) reads were perfectly mapped to the A. comosus_321_v3 genome. All of the clean reads mapped to the A. comosus_321_v3 genome were used for miRNA identification by miRDeep2. To facilitate the access and use of the sequence data, the data have been submitted to NCBI with BioProject number: PRJNA389361.
The different types of total small RNA sequences were further classified after using the Bowtie software to blast the clean reads against the Silva, GtRNAdb, Rfam and Repbase databases23. The clean reads were annotated as tRNAs, rRNA, snRNA, scRNA, snoRNAs, and repeat-associated small RNAs based on the Rfam database (Table S4).
Identification of miRNAs in A. comosus var. Bracteatus
All small RNA sequences were aligned to the precursor/mature miRNAs in the miRbase database using miRDeep2 software24. No known-miRNA was predicted. A total of 162, 163, 162, 162, 163, 161 novel miRNAs were identified in the six samples, respectively. The sequences of the 163 miRNAs are listed in Table S5. Among the 163 miRNAs, 104 miRNAs are conservative and 59 miRNAs are un-conservative. The length distribution of the identified miRNAs was shown in Fig. S1a. The most abundant sequence size is 21 nt-long, followed by 24 nt. The base bias on the first site of miRNAs with specific lengths and a specific site of miRNAs were shown in Fig. S1b,c. The majority of the 163 miRNAs started with a 5′-U, except for the 24nt-long miRNAs, which mostly started with A (59.26%). All the 19 nt-long miRNAs started with a 5′-U, followed by 21 nt-long miRNA (70.31%). The (A + U) percentage of the first nucleotide bias of 21 nt-long and 24-long miRNAs is 85.94% and 75.93% respectively. Nucleotide bias analysis at each position indicated that (A + U) occupied a very high percentage (77.16%) at the start of reads, while (G + C) occupied high frequency (61.02% at 24 nt and 80% at 25 nt) at the ends of reads. The distribution of the 163 identified miRNAs in each miRNA family was shown in Fig. S2. The 163 miRNAs were predicted to belong to 46 miRNA families. The most enriched family is miR399 (10), followed by miR159 (6), miR160 (6), miR164 (6) and miR166 (5).
Prediction and annotation of miRNA putative target genes
The putative target genes of miRNA were predicted by Target Finder software. Among the 163 miRNAs, 123 miRNAs were predicted with 488 potential target genes. The potential target genes were blasted to the Nr, Nt, Swiss-Prot, GO, COG, KEGG, KOG and Pfam databases. The statistic of the functional annotation of the target genes were listed in Table S6.
The Nr homologous species distribution of the 414 candidate target genes were shown in Fig. S3a. The blasted species are all monocots. The first three enriched species are Elaeis guineensis (166), Phoenix dactylifera (123) and Musa acuminate (42), which are all perennial tropical monocots. The blast results of the potential target genes found in COG database were shown in Fig. S3b. A total of 155 target genes were assigned to COG classification. The target genes were classified into 25 categories. The largest group is ‘General function prediction only’, followed by ‘Transcription’ and ‘Replication, recombination and repair’, and then ‘Signal transduction mechanisms’. GO analysis was conducted to describe the functional classification of target genes in terms of their associated biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions. A total of 243 target genes were annotated by GO database (Fig. S3c). ‘Cell part’, ‘Cell’ and ‘Organelle’ are the most enriched groups under the cellular component category. The most highly represented groups of molecular function category are ‘Binding’ and ‘Catalytic activity’. For the biological process category, the ‘Metabolic process’, ‘Cellular process’ and ‘Single-organism process’ are the most enriched groups. The potential target genes were also blasted to the KEGG database using BLASTx. Forty-two KEGG pathways were annotated by the target genes (Fig. S3d). The most frequently represented pathways are ‘Biosynthesis of amino acids’ (ko01230, 5), ‘Oxidative phosphorylation’ (ko00190, 5), followed by ‘Tropane, piperidine and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis’ (ko00960, 4) and ‘mRNA surveillance pathway’ (ko03015, 4).
Expression profiles of the miRNAs in different samples
The expression levels of the 163 miRNAs in the six samples were digitally measured and their expression relationships were characterized. The expression levels of the miRNAs were analyzed through the heat map method (Fig. 3a). The six samples were clustered to three groups, GS1 and WS1, WS2 and WS3, GS2 and GS3. Ten clusters were obtained from the expression data of the six samples using K-means method (Fig. 3b). These miRNAs target on genes functioned in transcription and translation, pigment biosynthesis and chloroplast development, sulfate assimilation, starch synthase, disease resistance ect. These miRNAs may presumably play very important roles in the growth and development of the complete white leaves.
The statistics of the number of differentially expressed miRNAs was shown in Fig. 3c. There are total 91 and 80 differentially expressed miRNAs between stage 1 and stage 2, in the CGr and CWh leaves respectively and about half of the differentially expressed miRNAs is down-regulated. Moreover, there are total 53 and 69 differentially expressed miRNAs between stage 2 and 3 in the CGr and CWh leaves respectively, and 87% and 84% of the differentially expressed miRNAs are down-regulated between stage 2 and 3 in CGr and CWh leaves respectively. This indicated that the number of differentially expressed miRNAs is decreased along the development of the plants in both CGr and CWh leaves. Compared with CGr and CWh leaves, there are 29, 65, 69 differentially expressed miRNAs at stage 1, 2, 3 respectively. At stage 2 and stage 3, the numbers of up-regulated (41, 40) and down-regulated miRNAs (24, 29) among CGr and CWh leaves are similar.
In order to identify potentially important miRNAs which functioned in the albino and development of the CWh leaves, the differentially expressed miRNAs (|log2 (FC)| ≥ 3 and FDR ≤ 0.01) between CGr and CWh leaves are selected and analyzed (Table 1). The expression of all the miRNAs except Ab-miR131, Ab-miR132, Ab-miR139 and Ab-miR152 are down regulated in CWh leaves. It is worth mentioning that the expression values of the differentially expressed miRNAs between CGr and CWh at three developmental stages are different, except Ab-miR7. The log2FC (WS/GS) valued of Ab-miR7 is −3.84 and −5.83 at developmental stages 2 and 3, respectively. Ab-miR7 is predicted to target on genes play roles in photosynthesis, sulfur metabolism, non-homologous end-joining and translation initiation.
Table 1.
Stage | MiRNA | Family | Target gene functions | log2FC(WS/GS) |
---|---|---|---|---|
GS1vsWS1 | Ab-miR45 | MIR1319 | SNARE interactions in vesicular transport Oxidative phosphorylation |
−3.23 |
Ab-miR84 | Endocytosis | −4.08 | ||
Ab-miR106 | MIR482 | Transcription Protein phosphorylation Development and cell death |
−3.33 | |
Ab-miR107 | MIR482 | Same as Ab-miR106 | −3.33 | |
Ab-miR124 | Biosynthesis of amino acids Photosynthesis Response to stress |
−3.44 | ||
GS2vsWS2 | Ab-miR6 | MIR395 | Photosynthesis Sulfur metabolism Non-homologous end-joining Translational initiation |
−3.03 |
Ab-miR7 | MIR395 | Same as Ab-miR6 | −3.48 | |
Ab-miR46 | MIR399 | Plant hormone signal transduction | −3.72 | |
Ab-miR152 | MIR1120 | Transcription factor bHLH | 3.19 | |
Ab-miR144 | MIR399 | rRNA methylation | −3.45 | |
Ab-miR139 | MIR1516 | No target gene predicted | 3.31 | |
GS3vsWS3 | Ab-miR7 | MIR395 | Same as Ab-miR6 | −5.83 |
Ab-miR8 | MIR395 | Sulfur metabolism Signal transduction Leaf development Translational initiation Non-homologous end-joining |
−4.66 | |
Ab-miR11 | MIR528 | Oxidation-reduction process Starch synthase Phosphorylation Endocytosis |
−3.19 | |
Ab-miR27 | MIR528 | Same as Ab-miR11 | −3.25 | |
Ab-miR101 | MIR528 | Same as Ab-miR11 | −3.25 | |
Ab-miR131 | MIR171_2 | No target gene predicted | 3.24 | |
Ab-miR132 | No target gene predicted | 3.62 |
Expression patterns of miRNAs targeted genes related to transcription factors
The expression patterns of the miRNAs target on transcription factors were shown in Table 2. There are fifteen miRNAs target on twelve transcription factors. Among them, Ab-miR152 and Ab-miR39 are differentially expressed between CGr and CWh leaves at all three developmental stages. Ab-miR87 and Ab-miR124 are differentially expressed between CGr and CWh leaves at only developmental stage 1 and 2.
Table 2.
DEG ID | Target gene annotation | GS1vsWS1 | GS2vsWS2 | GS3vsWS3 | GS1vs GS2 | GS2vs GS3 | WS1vsWS2 | WS2vsWS3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ab-miR73 Ab-miR90 |
AP2-like ethylene-responsive transcription factor | — — |
−2.95 — |
— — |
1.84
— |
— — |
— — |
1.49
— |
Ab-miR37, Ab-miR152, Ab-miR52 |
bHLH49 isoform X1 bHLH18-like bHLH140-like |
— 3.19 — |
— 2.26 — |
1.06
−2.22 — |
— — — |
— — −1.34 |
— — 1.09 |
— −1.86 −1.48 |
Ab-miR37 | GAMYB-like isoform X2 | — | — | 1.06 | — | — | — | — |
Ab-miR68 | homeobox-leucine zipper protein | — | — | 1.20 | 2.46 | −1.23 | 1.68 | — |
Ab-miR52, Ab-miR87 | WRKY48 WRKY9 |
— 1.82 |
— −2.32 |
— — |
— 1.29 |
−1.34 −4.10 |
1.09 −2.84 |
−1.48 −1.74 |
Ab-miR9 | CCAAT-binding transcription factor | — | — | −1.62 | −1.92 | — | −1.62 | — |
Ab-miR18 | TCP family transcription factor | — | 1.46 | — | −3.83 | — | −2.04 | — |
Ab-miR94 | LIM domain-containing protein WLIM1 | — | — | 2.32 | 1.89 | −2.17 | _ | 1.04 |
Ab-miR49 | Transcription factor BRX N-terminal domain | _ | 1.16 | — | — | — | — | −1.60 |
Ab-miR39 | SRF-type transcription factor | 1.60 | −2.25 | −1.09 | 1.49 | −2.75 | −2.36 | −1.59 |
Ab-miR124 | Trihelix transcription factor GT-3b | −3.44 | −2.37 | — | −6.09 | — | −5.02 | — |
Ab-miR156 | MADS-box transcription factor 50 | — | 2.13 | — | −1.65 | — | — | −1.91 |
Note: the values in each column (AvsB) was the value of [log2FC (B/A)].
— means no significant differences were detected between the two samples.
Identification of miRNAs target on genes related to chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis
The differentially expressed miRNAs with target genes related to chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis are listed in Table 3. There are seven miRNAs predicted to target on chlorophyll biosynthesis and nine miRNAs targeted on photosynthesis. Ab-miR73, Ab-miR90 and Ab-miR98 are predicted to target on Ferrochelatase (HemH, EC: 4.99.1.1), and are down regulated in CGr leaves at developmental stage 2. Ab-miR127, Ab-miR160, Ab-miR161 and Ab-miR163 are targeted on divinyl chlorophyllide a 8-vinyl-reductase (DVR, EC: 1.3.1.75), which are down regulated at stage 1 and up regulated at stages 2 and 3 in CWh leaves. And these four miRNAs are down regulated at developmental stage 2 compare to developmental stage 1 in both CGr and CWh leaves. Ab-miR6, Ab-miR7 and Ab-miR8 targeted on PGR-5 like protein (Ferredoxin-plastoquinone reductase 1), which is involved in the cyclic electron flow (CEF) around photosystem I25. Ab-miR6, Ab-miR7 and Ab-miR8 are up regulated at stage 1 and down regulated at stage 2 and stage 3 in CWh leaves. Ab-miR124 is predicted to target on trihelix transcription factor, which may act as a molecular switch in response to light signals26, and which is significantly down regulated in CWh leaves at developmental stage 1 and 2. Ab-miR124 is significantly down regulated along the development of both CGr and CWh leaves. The other miRNAs listed are targeted on genes related to the reaction center of the photosynthesis system27–29.
Table 3.
DEG ID | Target gene annotation | GS1vsWS1 | GS2vsWS2 | GS3vsWS3 | GS1vsGS2 | GS2vsGS3 | WS1vsWS2 | WS2vsWS3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ab-miR127 Ab-miR160 Ab-miR161 Ab-miR163 |
divinyl chlorophyllide a 8-vinyl-reductase |
−1.10
−1.10 −1.10 −1.10 |
2.06
2.06 2.06 2.06 |
1.25
1.25 1.25 1.25 |
−5.32
−5.32 −5.32 −5.32 |
— — — — |
−2.16
−2.16 −2.16 −2.16 |
— — — — |
Ab-miR73 Ab-miR90 Ab-miR98 |
Ferrochelatase | — |
−2.95
−2.95 −2.95 |
— |
1.84
1.84 1.84 |
— — — |
— — — |
1.49
1.49 1.49 |
Ab-miR6 Ab-miR7 Ab-miR8 |
PGR5-like protein |
1.35
1.32 1.39 |
−3.03
−3.48 −2.17 |
−5.50 −5.83 −4.66 |
— 1.03 — |
1.04
1.15 1.02 |
−3.58
−3.76 −3.64 |
−1.42
−1.20 −1.47 |
Ab-miR124 | Trihelix transcription factor | −3.44 | −2.37 | — | −6.09 | — | −5.02 | — |
Ab-miR52 Ab-miR83 |
PsbB (CP47)
tetrapyrrole-binding protein |
— — |
— — |
— 1.60 |
— — |
−1.34 −1.36 |
1.10 — |
−1.48 — |
Ab-miR108 | Ferredoxin-thioredoxin reductase | — | 1.16 | — | — | — | — | −1.17 |
Ab-miR82 Ab-miR104 |
PsbP
sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase |
— — |
— — |
1.65 1.65 |
−3.19
−3.19 |
−1.29
−1.29 |
−2.08
−2.08 |
— — |
Ab-miR3 | Chlorophyll a-b binding protein | — | — | 1.51 | −1.55 | −1.19 | — | — |
Ab-miR101 | polyphenol oxidase | — | −1.66 | −3.19 | 1.11 | — | — | −1.77 |
Ab-miR11 | polyphenol oxidase granule-bound starch synthase 1 | — | −1.66 −1.67 |
−3.19 −3.25 |
1.11 1.10 |
— — |
— — |
−1.77 −1.81 |
Note: the values in each column (AvsB) was the value of [log2FC (B/A)].
— means no significant differences were detected between the two samples.
Expression profiles of nine miRNAs and their potential target genes
In order to reveal the potential regulatory mechanism of the miRNAs action on the target genes, the expression profiles of nine miRNAs presumably relating to photosynthesis and chlorophyll biosynthesis, and their potential target genes were detected using qRT-PCR. The expression patterns of these miRNAs detected by RNA-seq are well corroborated by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4). This confirmed that the sequence results are reliable. The expression levels of the nine potential target genes of the nine miRNAs analyzed by qRT-PCR are shown in Fig. 5. Our results showed that the expression levels of these target genes are not all dependent on their predicted miRNAs based on the analysis of their expression levels. Many factors may affect the accuracy of target gene prediction and the regulatory relationships between miRNA and their target genes. For instance, the lacking of relevant research and genomic information may affect the accuracy of target gene prediction30. It is the first report of miRNA sequencing in A. comosus var. bracteatus, and the identification of miRNA is based on the genomic information of A. comosus var. comosus. Furthermore, some of these potential target genes are predicted to be regulated by more than one miRNAs at the translational level30. It is reported that isomeric sequences shared the authentic miRNA target genes with canonical miRNA31.
Discussion
The unstable chimeric character of the leaves in A. comosus var. bracteatus during tissue culture inhibits the commercial production of clones through tissue culture. Therefore, elucidating the albino mechanism of leaf cells is significant on the regulation of the stability of the chimera character in this plant. It is well known that miRNAs play important regulatory roles in gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by repressing the gene translation32. Previous studies have confirmed that miRNAs play a role in leaf development in higher plants32–34. It is reported that miRNAs are involved in regulation of many developmental processes, such as meristem identity, cell division and organ separation35–37.
In this study, we identified miRNAs from CGr and CWh leaves at three development stages by high-throughput sequencing. A total of 163 miRNAs were identified. These miRNAs belong to 46 miRNA families. The top five enriched miRNA families are miR399, miR159, miR160, miR164 and miR166. miR399 is involved in functions which respond to nutrient deficiency38,39 and are also an important regulator of Pi starvation-induced root-associated acid phosphatase activity40. miR159 negatively controls the expression of MYB33 and MYB6541,42, and the expression of miR159 is suppressed by DELLAs43. The miR159 works on leaf development and cell division by targeting TCP transcription factor genes44,45. The miR160 targets the auxin response factors (ARFs) to negatively regulate the auxin signaling46–48. The miR164 targets the NAC transcription factor ORE149 and CUC50, both involved in functions related to leaf development. The miR 164 also functions in response to hormone signals by targeting the NAC genes50,51. The miR166 regulates shoot apical meristem splitting by targeting the class III homeodomain leucine zipper transcription factors52. These results indicated that these growth and development aspects of A. comosus var. bracteatus may be regulated by miRNAs.
Along the development of both the CGr and CWh leaves, the number of differentially expressed miRNAs decreased. And the expression levels of about 85% of the differentially expressed miRNAs are decreased at development stage 3 compared to development stage 2. This data suggested that the regulation function of miRNA is more important at the early developmental stages of the leaves.
Since the expression levels of the seven miRNAs (Ab-miR6, Ab-miR7, Ab-miR8, Ab-miR11, Ab-miR15, Ab-miR27, Ab-miR67) are significantly decreased along the development of CWh leaves, while it is greatly increased in CGr leaves. These miRNAs are predicted to target on genes functioning in DNA repair, translation, sulfate assimilation, starch synthase, oxidation-reduction process, chloroplast development, leaf development, signal transduction etc. These results indicated that these biological processes are different between CGr and CWh leaves and regulated by miRNAs. The expression of most of the significantly differentially expressed miRNAs (|log2 (FC)| ≥ 3 and FDR ≤ 0.01) is down regulated in the CWh leaves. Ab-miR39, targeting on SRF-type transcription factor, is differentially expressed not only between CGr and CWh leaves at all three developmental stages, but also among the different developmental stages in the CGr and CWh leaves. SRF-type transcription factor plays roles on the positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter. Ab-miR152 is differentially expressed between the CGr and CWh leaves along the development stages. Ab-miR152 is a target on transcription factor bHLH18, which regulates transcription. Ab-miR124 is significantly down regulated in CWh leaves and at the early development stage of leaves. It is predicted to target on Trihelix transcription factor GT-3b, which may play a role in the induction of CAM4 in response to pathogen and salt53. It is predicated that these miRNAs could be presumably important to the albino and development of the leaves and are worth to further studying in the future.
The expression profiles of the nine miRNAs and their potential target genes in the CWh and CGr leaves showed that only a part of the potential target genes are dependent on their miRNAs. It has been previously shown that the expression profiles of all five detected potential target genes are independent of miRNAs in celery32. It is believed that the majority of miRNA regulation of genes is indirect54 and not all target genes are directly regulated by miRNAs55. Previous study has shown that the binding of miRNA is shown to up-regulate the expression of target mRNAs56 in certain cellular conditions.
In this study, we reported the first comprehensive study on miRNAs of A. comosus var. bracteatus performed through high throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis methods. Our results showed that there are 163 novel miRNAs being identified, and their potential target genes are predicted and functionally annotated using the Nr, Pfam, KOG/COG, Swiss-Prot, KO, GO and KEGG databases. The miRNAs presumably involved in the albino of the CWh leaves and the development of CGr and CWh leaves were selected and their expression patterns were analyzed. The expression of nine miRNAs related to chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis and their potential target genes were validated by qRT-PCR. These studies will provide a foundation on elucidating the functions and molecular regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs in the development of normal and albino leaves in A. comosus var. bracteatus.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (31570698; 31770743;31300585). We are thankful to Sichuan Agricultural University, China for providing support in the present investigation.
Author Contributions
J.M. and Y.Y.X. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.Y.X., X.L., R.X.L., S.M.Y. and Z.L. performed the experiments. Y.Y.X., J.M., Y.H.H., F.X.J., X.L., L.X.S. and Z.H. analyzed the data. J.M. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. X.Y.Y. and J.M. wrote the paper.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-20261-z.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Collins, J. L. The Pineapple: Botany, Utilisation, Cultivation (Interscience Publishers, 1960).
- 2.Montinola, L. R. P. (Amon Foundation, 1991).
- 3.Wen L, Wrolstad RE, Hsu VL. Characterization of sinapyl derivatives in pineapple (Ananas comosus [L] Merr.) juice. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47:850–853. doi: 10.1021/jf9808067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Takata RH, Scheuer PJ. Isolation of glyceryl esters of caffeic and p-coumaric acids from pineapple stems. Lloyd. 1976;39:409–411. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Taussig SJ, Batkin S. Bromelain, the enzyme complex of pineapple (Ananas comosus) and its clinical application: an update. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998;22:191–203. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(88)90127-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rocha FD, Kaplan MAC. Secondary metabolites from Ananas bracteatus lindley (Bromeliaceae) An Acad Bras Cienc. 2000;72:295. doi: 10.1590/S0001-37652000000200026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bartholomew, D. P. The pineapple: botany, production, and uses (CABI, 2002).
- 8.Beauman, F. The pineapple: king of fruits. 3674–3676 (Random House, 2006).
- 9.Li X, et al. Physiological characterization and comparative transcriptome analysis of white and green leaves of Ananas comosus var. bracteatus. PloS One. 2017;12(1):1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cai Y, et al. A brief review on the mechanisms of mirna regulation. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2009;7:147–154. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(08)60044-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rogersa K, Chen XM. Biogenesis, turnover, and mode of action of plant microRNAs. Plant Cell. 2013;25:2383–2399. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shahab S, et al. The effects of microRNA transfections on global patterns of gene expression in ovarian cancer cells are functionally coordinated. BMC Medical Genomics. 2012;5(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-5-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Holm G. Chlorophyll mutation in barley. Acta Agric Scandinavica. 1954;1:457–471. doi: 10.1080/00015125409439955. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang Z, Jiang L, Wang JJ, Gu PZ, Chen M. An integrated tool for the identification of miRNA-target interaction in plants. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):290–291. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Romualdi C, Bortoluzzi S, D’Alessi F, Danieli GA. IDEG6: a web tool for detection of differentially expressed genes in multiple tag sampling experiments. Physiol Genomics. 2003;12(2):159–162. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00096.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC. MicroRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005;121:207–221. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deng YY, et al. Integrated nr database in protein annotation system and its localization. Computer Engineering. 2006;32(5):71–74. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eddy SR. Profile hidden markov models. Bioinformatics Italic. 1998;14(9):755–763. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Koonin EV, et al. A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biology Italic. 2004;5(2):7. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roman LT, et al. The COG database: a tool for genome scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):33–38. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Apweiler R, et al. UniProt: the universal protein knowledge base. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:115. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ashburner M, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biology. 2009;10(3):R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang Z, et al. MTide: an integrated tool for the identification of miRNA-target interaction in plants. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:290–191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.DalCorso G, et al. Complex containing PGRL1 and PGR5 is involved in the switch between linear and cyclic electron flow in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2008;132:273–285. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hiratsuka K, Wu X, Fukuzawa H, Chua NH. Molecular dissection of GT-1 from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1994;6:1805–1813. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.12.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Glauser DA, Bourquin F, Manieri W, Schurmann P. Characterization of ferredoxin: thioredoxin reductase modified by site-directed mutagenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:16662–16669. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313851200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu J, et al. PsbP-domainprotein1, a nuclear-encoded thylakoid lumenal protein, is essential for photosystem I assembly in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24:4992–5006. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.106542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Adamiec M, et al. Excitation energy transfer and charge separation are affected in Arabidopsis thaliana mutants lacking light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding protein Lhcb3. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2015;153:423–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Su YC, et al. Small RNA sequencing reveals a role for sugarcane miRNAs and their targets in response to sporisorium scitamineum infection. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:325. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3716-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ahmed F, et al. Comprehensive analysis of small RNA-seq data reveals that combination of miRNA with its isomiRs increase the accuracy of target prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana. RNA Biol. 2014;11(11):1414–1429. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2014.996474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jia XL, et al. High-throughput sequencing of small RNAs and anatomical characteristics associated with leaf development in Celery. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:11093. doi: 10.1038/srep11093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xie K, et al. Gradual increase of miR156 regulates temporal expression changes of numerous genes during leaf development in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2012;158:1382–1394. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.190488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mao YF, et al. MicroRNA319a-targeted Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis TCP genes modulate head shape in Chinese Cabbage by differential cell division arrest in leaf regions. Plant Physiol. 2014;164:710–720. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.228007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wong CE, et al. MicroRNAs in the shoot apical meristem of soybean. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:2495–2506. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang L, et al. MiR396-targeted AtGRF transcription factors are required for coordination of cell division and differentiation during leaf development in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:761–773. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rodriguez RE, et al. Control of cell proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana by microRNA miR396. Development. 2010;137:103–112. doi: 10.1242/dev.043067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kuo HF, Chiou TJ. The role of microRNAs in phosphorus deficiency signaling. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:1016–1024. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.María JG, Francisco JR, Carlos L, Esteban A, Rafael PV. Focus on Ethylene: ethylene and the regulation of physiological and morphological responses to nutrient deficiencies. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:51–60. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tao S, et al. The THO/TREX complex active in miRNA biogenesis negatively regulates root-Associated acid phosphatase activity induced by phosphate starvation. Plant Physiol. 2016;171(4):2841–2853. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Millar AA, Gubler F. The Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes, MYB33 and MYB65, are microRNA-regulated genes that redundantly facilitate anther development. Plant Cell. 2005;17:705–721. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.027920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Alonso-Peral MM, et al. The microRNA159-regulated GAMYB-like genes inhibit growth and promote programmed cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:757–771. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.160630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Achard P, Herr A, Baulcombe DC, Harberd NP. Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development. 2004;131:3357–3365. doi: 10.1242/dev.01206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Palatnik JF, et al. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature. 2003;425:257–263. doi: 10.1038/nature01958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li Y, Li CQ, Ding GH, Jin YX. Evolution of MIR159/319 microRNA genes and their post-transcriptional regulatory link to siRNA pathways. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nicaise V, Roux M, Zipfel C. Focus Issue on Plant Interactions with Bacterial Pathogens: recent advances in PAMP-Triggered immunity against bacteria: pattern recognition receptors watch over and raise the alarm. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:1638–1647. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.139709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yang J, et al. Auxin response factor 17 is essential for pollen wall pattern formation in. Arabdopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013;162:720–731. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.214940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu Q, et al. Complementation of hyponastic leaves I by double-strand RNA-binding domains of Dicer-like 1 in nuclear dicing bodies. Plant Physiol. 2013;163:108–117. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.219071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim M, et al. Activation of the programmed cell death pathway by inhibition of proteasome function in plants. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:19406–19415. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210539200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sieber P, Wellmer F, Gheyselinck J, Riechmann JL, Meyerowitz EM. Redundancy and specialization among plant microRNAs: role of the MIR164 family in developmental robustness. Development. 2007;134:1051–1060. doi: 10.1242/dev.02817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Guo HS, Xie Q, Fei JF, Chua NH. MicroRNA directs mRNA cleavage of the transcription factor NAC1 to down regulate auxin signals for Arabidopsis lateral root development. Plant Cell. 2005;17:1376–1386. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.030841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Williams L, Grigg SP, Xie M, Christensen S, Fletcher JC. Regulation of Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem and lateral organ formation by microRNA miR166g and its AtHD-ZIP target genes. Development. 2005;132:3657–3668. doi: 10.1242/dev.01942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Park HC, et al. Pathogen- and NaCl-induced expression of the SCaM-4 promoter is mediated in part by a GT-1 box that tnteracts with a GT-1-like transcription factor. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:2150–2161. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.041442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Shahab S, et al. The effects of microRNA transfections on global patterns of gene expression in ovarian cancer cells are functionally coordinated. BMC Medical Genomics. 2012;5:33. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-5-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Taguchi YH. Possible miRNA coregulation of target genes in brain regions by both differential miRNA expression and miRNA-targeting-sepecific promoter methylation. ICIC, CCIS. 2013;375:225–230. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vasudevan S, Tong Y, Steitz JA. Switching from repression to activation: microRNAs can up-regulate translation. Science. 2007;318(5858):1931–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1149460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.