Abstract
In this work we present the design and implementation of two uniform-field resonators: a seven-loop–six-gap loop-gap resonator (LGR) and a rectangular TEU02 cavity resonator. Each resonator has uniform-field-producing end-sections. These resonators have been designed for electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) of aqueous samples at 94 GHz. The LGR geometry employs low-loss Rexolite end-sections to improve the field homogeneity over a 3 mm sample region-of-interest from near-cosine distribution to 90% uniform. The LGR was designed to accommodate large degassable Polytetrafluorethylen (PTFE) tubes (0.81 mm O.D.; 0.25 mm I.D.) for aqueous samples. Additionally, field modulation slots are designed for uniform 100 kHz field modulation incident at the sample. Experiments using a point sample of lithium phthalocyanine (LiPC) were performed to measure both the uniformity of the microwave magnetic field and 100 kHz field modulation, and confirm simulations. The rectangular TEU02 cavity resonator employs over-sized end-sections with sample shielding to provide an 87% uniform field for a 0.1 × 2 × 6 mm3 sample geometry. An evanescent slotted window was designed for light access to irradiate 90% of the sample volume. A novel dual-slot iris was used to minimize microwave magnetic field perturbations and maintain cross-sectional uniformity. Practical EPR experiments using the application of light irradiated rose bengal (4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2′,4′,5′,7′-tetraiodofluorescein) were performed in the TEU02 cavity. The implementation of these geometries providing a practical designs for uniform field resonators that continue resonator advancements towards quantitative EPR spectroscopy.
Keywords: Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, microwaves, uniform field cavity, aqueous samples, high frequency, light access
1. Introduction
In this work we present two new geometries for electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) of aqueous samples at 94 GHz (W-band): i) a seven-loop–six-gap (LGR) with enhanced end-sections, shown in Fig. 1A and ii) a rectangular TEU02 cavity with over-sized end-sections, shown in Fig. 1B. These resonators take advantage of uniform field methodology for improved quantitative experiments.
Figure 1.
Fabricated geometries of the A) seven-loop–six-gap LGR and B) assembled TEU02 cavity showing the 0.1 × 2 mm flat cell capillary and light access slot.
Methods to produce a uniform microwave field in cavity resonators were introduced by Mett et al. [1–4] for cavity and re-entrant geometries and later for loop-gap resonators [5]. Uniform field cavities are defined as resonant structures at cut-off with a strictly uniform microwave magnetic field over a region-of-interest extending parallel to the propagation vector of the cavity. In order for the central section waveguide at cut-off to satisfy Maxwell's equations, a perfect-magnetic boundary condition must be matched to the central section by each end-section. Three matching methods were shown to produce this effect: i) over-sized end-sections above cut-off, ii) re-entrant metallic structures that adding capacitance to the end-section, and iii) dielectric end-sections of length λ/4 placed at each shorted end. All end-section types present an rf open impedance boundary condition to the central cut-off section. These methods are illustrated in Fig. 2.
Figure 2.
Illustrations of three methods for creating uniform fields in cavities. Region-of-interest at cut-off is matched to A) an over-sized section, B) a reentrant end-section with capacitive posts (black circles), C) a dielectric section of length λ/4 placed at a shorted end. Magnetic fields vectors are illustrated with dotted lines.
Sidabras et al. introduced a five-loop–four-gap LGR at 94 GHz [6]. The LGR at W-band permitted a number of experiments that required high resonator efficiency and bandwidth, such as ELDOR, saturation recovery, and frequency sweep experiments [7, 8]. The LGR was designed for a 0.15 mm I.D. quartz capillary with an active region of 1 mm. A method for degassing the sample outside of the resonator was devised. However, this only permitted 100% air or 100% nitrogen degassing. In order to permit air/nitrogen gas mixture degassing in the resonator, a design for Polytetrafluorethylen (PTFE) capillaries was devised. The seven-loop–six-gap resonator was designed with a 0.825 mm sample loop to accommodate Zeus Inc. (Orangeburg, SC, USA) extruded PTFE sample tubes with a 0.25 mm I.D. and 0.81 mm O.D.
Recently, Sidabras et al. introduced methodology to produce uniform 100 kHz field modulation incident on the sample by numerically optimizing the modulation slot depth [9]. In the present work, this methodology was used to optimize, simulate, and implement uniform 100 kHz field modulation slot design in the seven-loop–six-gap LGR geometry. By providing a strictly uniform 100 kHz field modulation and enhanced microwave magnetic field uniformity, we provide a model for resonator design for quantitative EPR at high frequencies [10].
The rectangular TEU02, shown in Fig. 1B, was designed for light access experiments at W-band. Light access slots were designed to have 90% illumination with -100 dB microwave leakage [11]. A flat-cell sample with inner dimensions of 0.1 × 2 mm2 from VitroCom (Mountain Lakes, NJ, USA) was chosen. The large aspect-ratio provides a thin surface for reduced light refraction. The uniform field method of oversized end-sections, illustrated in Fig. 2A, is employed with sample shields to limit the microwave magnetic field incident on the sample to only the region-of-interest. Sample shields provide a metallic sleeve that extends into the end-sections where the microwave magnetic field is non-uniform.
The seven-loop–six-gap LGR reported here is the first practical example of a uniform field LGR as introduced in Ref. [5]. The rectangular TEU02 geometry is the first practical implementation of the rectangular geometries introduced in Ref. [1] and extensively studied in Ref. [2] with two notable differences. First, the geometry described here provides light-access slots. Second, the null index is extended compared to a traditional rectangular TE102 cavity providing two dimensions of uniform field (the z-direction and the null x-direction).
The use of uniform field resonators provides a number of advantages to traditional resonators with a cosine dependence in the transverse z-direction. A uniform field resonator i) provides better quantitative measurements reducing the need to calibrate the resonator and modulation profile [10]; ii) allows the region-of-interest to be extended to provide a larger sample volume, increasing the EPR concentration sensitivity; iii) perform reliable CW saturation studies; iv) in pulse experiments with need for coherent pulses (such as ESEEM and HYSCORE) provides the same magnetic field excitation along the entire sample volume [12]; and v) provides uniform excitation for arbitrary-wave form shaped inversion pulses [13] and frequency modulation sweeps.
2. Methods
Finite-element simulations were performed on a Dell Precision T7500 workstation with dual six-core Xeon 5650 2.67 GHz processors with 12 MB of L2 Cache per chip and 124 GB of system DDR4 RAM. A RAM drive was set up with 8 GB of RAM in order to reduce hard-drive bottlenecks. This system has been optimized for simulations and new versions of ANSYS (Canonsburg, PA, USA) High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS; v. 17.2) are able to take advantage of all twelve CPUs during finite-element modeling matrix solving. The operating system was Windows 7 64-bit. The eigenmode and driven mode solvers were used and typical simulation times were 10 minutes. All simulations were performed at 95 GHz (W-band).
A sample holding technique using a slot and clamp structure has been implemented in the LGR to hold 0.81 mm outer diameter PTFE tubing [14]. Holding such tubing was found in the past to be challenging and would result in an unstable tune. In current experiments, the resonator and tuning structure has held exceptionally well for hours. The new resonator structure has a gas exchange port designed in the narrow face of the waveguide. In the rectangular TEU02 cavity, flat-cell sample holding is accomplished using PTFE tape to hold the sample in place.
Both geometries were designed using the 3D software tool, AutoDesk Inventor Professional. Integrity Wire EDM (Sussex, WI, USA) performed the electric discharge machining (EDM) manufacturing. Two types of EDM are available: die-sink and wire-cut. Wire-cut EDM uses a thin wire at a high potential (the part to be machined is grounded) under an oil bath to cut the through features. For high precision blind cuts, die-sink EDM is used. Die-sink EDM uses a mandrel to etch away a given pattern. EDM provides positional tolerances down to 0.001 mm. Wire-cut EDM allows feature sizes down to 0.05 mm (0.03 mm wire) and die-sink is limited to the mandrel manufacturing. All electrodes were tungsten. EDM is considered a “zero force” manufacturing technique and, as such, small features are easily manufactured compared to traditional machining. EDM fabrication techniques are essential to high-precision high frequency resonator development.
The LGR was fabricated from oxygen-free copper for resonator body and end-sections. The rectangular TEU02 cavity was fabricated from three-nine (0.999 pure) silver for the resonator body and over-sized end-sections. Both resonator bodies are encased in a graphite shield. The graphite shield minimizes microwave leakage and environmental rf noise.
Bench tests were performed on the Agilent Technologies (Keysight Technology; Santa Rosa, CA, USA) PNA-X model N5242A vector network analyzer with an Agilent N5262A millimeter head controller, two OML V10VNA2 T/R 75 to 110 GHz millimeter wave extender, and an OML V10-CAL calibration kit.
Each resonator iris is designed in Ansys HFSS to be over-coupled. Fine-tuning performed using a tungsten rod protruding into the wide face of the WR-10 waveguide and adjusted by a nylon screw. The tungsten rod placed (n + 5/8)λg from the resonator iris, where n is 3 wavelengths and λg is the wavelength of the microwaves at 94 GHz. It was found that by placing a pill at 5/8λg from the resonator iris achieves minimal frequency pulling.
EPR measurements using a point sample of lithium phthalocyanine (LiPC) were used to quantify the uniformity of the LGR with enhanced end-sections. EPR measurements were performed on a home-built W-band spectrometer [15]. Measurements were made at room temperature, with a 2.5 mT sweep width over 90 seconds and a receiver time constant of 10 ms. The power was at 10 μW, well below saturation. The field modulation was set to 0.1 mT at 100 kHz. The LiPC sample was placed in a quartz capillary and precisely moved at 0.5 mm increments through the region-of-interest. Measurements of the amplitude and peak-to-peak width were recorded. EPR signal intensity is proportional to , while the peak-to-peak linewidth is proportional to Bm if the sample is sufficiently over-modulated.
EPR measurements using 0.1 mM rose bengal (4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2′,4′,5′,7′-tetraiodofluorescein) in the presence of 0.5 mM ascorbate in the rectangular TEU02 cavity were performed with 10 mT sweep width over 190 seconds and a receiver time constant of 10 ms. The power was at 100 μW, well below saturation. Field modulation was set to 0.4 mT at 433 Hz. A 532 nm wavelength laser was affixed outside of the magnet. An attenuating filter was attached to the laser to minimize bleaching of the sample during acquisition.
The effect of the magnetic field variation on the sample should be taken into account when calculating the resonator efficiency, which is normally defined at a point and assumes uniform field [16]. For example, a cylindrical TE011 cavity has an H1 field that is cosine in the transverse z-direction. In this work, we define the resonator efficiency as an average over the sample volume,
(1) |
where B1r is the clock-wise (or counter clock-wise) rotational component of the linear magnetic field perpendicular to the static magnetic field, in milliTesla, integrated over the sample volume, V. In addition, Ps, Pw, and Pt are the power losses associated with the sample, walls, and sample holder, respectively. The Λave-to-Λmax ratio can be used as a metric to the uniformity of the resonator.
EPR signal intensity and Λ values were calculated using ANSYS HFSS solutions [17] and tabulated for comparison with the previous resonators [6]. Two EPR signal conditions are calculated: signal unsaturable and signal saturable. Signal unsaturable is defined as the EPR signal intensity at constant incident power, while signal saturable is defined as the EPR signal intensity at constant microwave magnetic field.
3. Design
3.1. Uniform Field Rectangular TEU02 Cavity
Illustrated in Fig. 3A is a half-structure CAD drawing of the fabricated rectangular TEU02 cavity. The light access slots and over-sized end-sections are shown. The over-sized end-sections also include a sample end-section shield.
Figure 3.
A) Half-structure CAD drawing illustrating the rectangular TEU02 geometry with over-sized end-sections, sample access port, light access, and sample end-section shield, B) Magnetic field magnitude profile showing the 6 mm region-of-interest and C) Magnetic field magnitude profile showing the dual iris (thickness 0.1 mm) and sample placement (dashed). Dotted line represents the cavity wall illustrating the light access slots beyond cut-off. Red is large magnetic field and dark blue zero magnetic field.
Testing the rectangular resonator uniformity is straightforward. Since the resonant frequency is highly dependent on the sample geometry we must test the resonator uniformity using a network analyzer and not by perturbing sphere methods or measuring the EPR signal of a point sample. In order to obtain the cut-off frequency of the region-of-interest flat end-sections were made and attached to the resonator body to form a typical rectangular TE102 cavity. The frequency with flat-cell and aqueous sample was measured using the Agilent PNA-X network analyzer to be 96.2 GHz. From the measured frequency of the TE102 cavity, the cut-off frequency can be calculated which would include mechanical imperfections, iris, and sample variations. The cut-off frequency was calculated to be 92.95 GHz. The over-sized end-sections are then installed and the resonator frequency with flat-cell and aqueous sample was recorded as 93.21 GHz. The resonator frequency being higher than the cut-off means the magnetic field profile is slightly cosine. In Ansys HFSS, one can adjust the geometry to match the region-of-interest cut-off frequency and the full assembly frequency. Simulating the modified geometry yields a microwave magnetic field that is 87% uniform.
The rectangular TEU02 cavity is coupled by a novel dual long-slot capacitive iris. Each slot is 0.1 mm wide and extends the entire height of a WR-10 waveguide (2.54 mm). The dual long-slot iris minimizes coupling to higher-order modes that arise from the long (6 mm) uniform region-of-interest and the wide 2.35 mm zero index. Coupling to higher-order modes degrades the uniformity of the resonator. With the dual long-slot capacitive iris, only the TEU02 mode is coupled. The symmetry of the magnetic field is shown in Figs. 3B and 3C.
Also shown in Figs. 3B and 3C are the evanescent fields in the light access slots. The inside geometry of the rectangular resonator edge is illustrated as a dotted line in Fig. 3C. The depth of the light slots is designed to have more than -100 dB of microwave leakage. Any remaining leakage is absorbed by the graphite shield.
3.1.1. Dual Iris Design
The need for dual iris design is qualitatively illustrated in Fig. 4 using a TE102 rectangular cavity. Plotted in Fig. 4 are simulations of the x- and y-components of the electric field, denoted Ex and Ey. Our (x, y, z) coordinates have the corresponding mode indices (m, n, p), which correlate to the conventional waveguide mode index order TEpmn. The contour plots show the real part of the peak value of (Ex + Ey) over the cross-section of the resonator. Here we compare a conventional TE102 rectangular cavity cross-section which has an zero-index length (x = a) less than the two-index length (y = b), illustrated in Fig. 4A. The electric field is strictly in the x-direction.
Figure 4.
Simulations of the real part of the peak value of (Ex + Ey) over the x–y cross-section of the resonator illustrating A) typical TE102 mode with small zero-index length, B) TE102 mode with large zero-index length, C) TE111 mode with large zero-index length, D) TE112 mode with large zero-index length, E) TE121 mode with large zero-index length. Plus (+) and Minus (−) show field maxima and minima, square (■) is zero field.
In the typical TE102 configuration, the resonant frequencies of the nearby TE111 and TE112 modes are sufficiently higher than the TE102 mode and, therefore, no coupling occurs with a single iris excitation. However, as the zero-index length a is extended, as illustrated in Figs. 4B-E, the TE111, TE112 and TE121 resonant frequencies can approach the resonant frequency of the TE102 mode. The resonance frequencies of a TE (or TM) rectangular cavity mode are described by
(2) |
where c is the speed of light in the resonator, TEpmn is the resonator nomenclature, (a, b, h) correspond to the (x, y, z) cavity dimensions and the indices (m, n, p) correspond to the number of half-wavelengths of microwave field in each dimension [18]. As a approaches b, the m and n indices can be interchanged without changing the resonance frequencies. Using the dimensions a = 2.35 mm, b = 3.13 mm and neglecting the p term, it can be shown from this equation that the nearest-neighbor modes to the TE102 are the TE111 and the TE112 with frequencies 17% below 20% above that of the TE102, respectively. The TE112 is 42% above that of the TE102. These frequency ratios match those produced by the simulations of Figs. 4B-E.
A necessary but insufficient condition for a cavity mode to couple to the iris is the same as the condition for the excitation of a second-order lumped circuit response, namely that the resonance frequency of the mode f0 and the excitation frequency be within [18]
(3) |
where Q is the Q-value of the mode. The Q values of the undesired modes can be very low because the electric fields of these modes pass through the aqueous sample, unlike the TE102. The simulated Q-values and frequencies, shown in Table 1, observed in the pure-mode simulations were 19, 236, and 66 for the TE111, TE112 and TE121 respectively. One can compare these values to the reciprocals of the percent frequency deviations given above, suggesting strongest coupling to the TE111 and TE121 modes with a single iris. It should be noted that, this is further complicated by the introduction of the oversized end-sections needed to match the region-of-interest in uniform field resonators which will lower the frequencies of the higher-order modes and increase the coupling.
Table 1.
Resonator characteristics calculated for nearest-neighbor modes of the rectangular TE102 with sample.
Mode | Freq. (GHz) | Q0-Value |
---|---|---|
TE111 | 70.12 | 19 |
TE102 | 94.32 | 510 |
TE112 | 109.51 | 236 |
TE121 | 124.49 | 66 |
The other condition for coupling is that the iris microwave fields be of a similar polarization as the mode. The long-slot iris minimizes mode perturbation by having an excitation 180 degrees out of phase from the mode [19] creating a propagation into the cavity. The single and dual iris excitation is illustrated as an inset in Fig. 4. The coupling strength is proportional to the integral of the dot product of the iris fields and the mode fields over the volume [20]. As illustrated in Fig. 5A, a single long-slot iris couples to the TE102 with some level of TE111, TE112 and possibly TE121 modes also present causing significant distortions to the electric and magnetic fields. Because the fields of the single iris are so large and of proper polarization over a volume, the single iris effectively couples to the unwanted nearby cavity modes, illustrated in Fig. 5A.
Figure 5.
Simulations of the real part of the peak value of (Ex+ Ey) over the x—y cross-section of the resonator illustrating A) large zero-index TE102 mode with single capacitive slot iris, B) large zero-index TE102 mode with dual capacitive slot iris.
In order to improve the coupling coefficient to the TE102 mode and reduce the coupling to the unwanted modes, a perturbation can be introduced that is orthogonal to the unwanted modes. A dual iris, illustrated in Fig. 5B, meets this type of perturbation. With a dual iris, two perturbations with the same electric field direction (no phase shift) are introduced symmetrically spaced apart on the cavity wall. The perturbation introduced by one iris is largely canceled by the other for each of the unwanted modes. Extending this analysis to the TEU02 cavity, the purity of the TEU02 mode is significantly improved, as shown in Figs. 3B and 3C.
3.2. Seven-Loop–Six-Gap LGR with Enhanced End-Sections
Illustrated in Fig. 6A is a half-structure CAD drawing of the fabricated seven-loop–six-gap LGR. The seven-loop–six-gap geometry is illustrated in Fig. 6B. The large inductance of the sample loop requires a significant reduction in capacitance. A six-gap geometry was chosen to reduce the total capacitance by the number of gaps. To accomplish this a gap with a small parallel area was produced. The gap and the outside loops were connected by a flared gap. The magnetic field profile is shown in Fig. 7.
Figure 6.
A) Half-structure CAD drawing illustrating the LGR resonator assembly including the gas exchange port, resonator iris, Rexolite end-sections, and shorted end-sections. B) Illustration of the seven-loop–six-gap LGR geometry. The sample loop is in the center with a diameter of 0.825 mm, outside loops at 0.95 mm, and a gap of 0.29 mm. Waveguide and iris are shown as a dotted line. C) Side view of the LGR with a 3 mm active region. Rexolite end-sections are highlighted and modulation slots optimized for uniform 100 kHz incident on the sample are illustrated.
Figure 7.
A) Magnetic field profile for the seven-loop–six-gap LGR illustrating sample placement (dashed) and B) cross-section of magnetic field. Red is large magnetic field and blue is no magnetic field.
The creation of “imperfect” gaps produces a lower filling factor and efficiency. An Ansys HFSS simulation is shown in Fig. 7B, which shows the magnetic field is not fully contained within the sample loop. Due to the boundary conditions and standing electromagnetic waves of a resonant geometry, the electric field is concentrated at the magnetic field nulls (dark blue). This resonant structure could be described as a reentrant cylindrical TE011 geometry. We chose to use the LGR nomenclature.
It was shown in Mett et al. that by increasing the size of the outer loops, compared to the inner sample loop, the input impedance of the LGR approaches the characteristic impedance of the WR-10 waveguide [19]. This important finding has two consequences. First, the long-slot capacitive iris width approaches the width of the waveguide. This reduces the stored energy of the iris resulting in less magnetic field perturbation. Second, by reducing the stored energy of the iris, the frequency shift expected by matching with a tuning pill is significantly reduced. This is due to the lower reactance of the system. Using Ansys HFSS, it was found that a circular hole iris produces a 160 MHz frequency shift during matching. The frequency shift is reduced to less than a 80 MHz during matching with the long-slot iris design.
Illustrated in Figs. 6A and 6C are the dielectric enhanced end-sections. The enhanced end-sections are a practical compromise for creating uniform field LGRs at high frequencies [5]. By adding dielectric end-sections to a shorted LGR, a uniform field in a region-of-interest can be realized. As the physical size of the resonators decreases with frequency, it becomes impractical to machine dielectric end-sections with the loop-gap geometry of the shorted LGR. However, it is possible to design the LGR with an open end-section and a low-loss dielectric to approximate the boundary condition. This becomes possible as the number of gaps increases and the LGR approaches the magnetic field of a re-entrant cylindrical waveguide. Therefore, a seven-loop–six-gap resonator can approximately match a short transformed by a λ/4 dielectric slab [18], similar to the uniform field method of Fig. 2C. However, this method is only an approximation to an open impedance and a true uniform field may not be possible due to the mismatch. Ansys HFSS simulations, shown in Fig. 7A, have a 90% uniform magnetic field over the 3 mm region-of-interest.
As the LGR length increases and the inner sample loop becomes larger, a near-cosine distribution of the magnetic field to occurs. For instance, without end-sections the magnetic field is 60% uniform over the 3 mm region-of-interest, similar to a cylindrical TE011. Therefore, the above methodology corrects for longer LGR geometries and large sample loop. With such a geometry an increase in EPR concentration sensitivity can be achieved. The 3 mm region-of-interest was chosen to maintain a good resonator efficiency and EPR concentration sensitivity.
Design of the field modulation slots is produced by the following: i) simulating the 100 kHz field modulation profile in the region-of-interest for n slots of equal depth, ii) reducing the central slots by approximately half, and iii) adjusting slots to minimize ripple along the sample [9]. After each step a simulation is run and uniformity along the axis of the sample is calculated. Using Ansys HFSS built-in optimization, this process can be automated. The slots are mirrored from the center of the resonator to reduce the parameter space. The designed slots are illustrated in Fig. 6 and are calculated to be 98% uniform over the region-of-interest. This solution is not unique.
4. Results
A comparison of calculated and measured characteristics of the new resonators and resonators of Ref. 6 is shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Resonator characteristics calculated and measured of new geometries compared to resonators of Ref. 6
Geometry | Freq. Meas. [Ghz.] | Q0-value Meas. | Signal Unsaturable (Calc.) [V] | Signal Saturable (Calc.) [V] | Λmax Calc. [mT/W1/2] | Λave Calc. [mT/W1/2] | Sample [mm] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cylindrical TE011 Cavity | 93.35 | 1630 | 8.41 | 1.18 | 0.3 | 0.18 | 0.15I.D. × 3 |
Five-loop–four-gap LGR | 94.31 | 350 | 10.00 | 0.97 | 1.12 | 0.50 | 0.15I.D. × 1 |
Seven-loop–six-gap LGR | 94.17 | 150 | 19.16 | 6.36 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.25I.D. × 3 |
Rectangular TEU02 Cavity | 93.21 | 510 | 6.82 | 4.56 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.1 × 2 × 6 |
Shown in Fig. 8 is the complex spectrum of rose bengal and ascorbyl radicals in sample containing aqueous solution of rose bengal and sodium ascorbate photo excited with green light (532 nm) using the rectangular TEU02. We report this test spectrum as the first experiment of rose bengal at 94 GHz. At X-band, under similar experimental conditions the rose bengal anion radical exhibits a three line spectrum with hyperfine splitting 0.31 mT, due to the interaction of unpaired electron with two equivalent protons [21, 22]. At W-band, the hyperfine splitting is broadened by the rotational correlation time of the rose bengal molecule and the lower resonator efficiency requires higher power resulting in potential source noise. Future studies are underway.
Figure 8.
Spectra of 0.1mM Rose bengal in the presence of 0.5 mM ascorbate photo-excited using the rectangular TEU02 shown with and without 532 nm wavelength excitation. Resulting residual spectrum is in red. Experiments were performed at room temperature with 10 mT sweep width over 190 seconds, 0.4 mT field modulation at 433 Hz, and a microwave power of 100 μW.
In the dark a single line EPR signal can be observed. This EPR signal could be attributed to the ascorbyl radical, which is always present in the aerated aqueous solution of ascorbate. Additionally, the apparent lack of the dependence of the ascorbyl radical signal intensity on sample irradiation can be explained by substantial differences in the decay kinetics of the ascorbyl and rose bengal anion radicals, resulting in different steady-state concentrations of the photoinduced radicals [22, 23].
Shown in Fig. 9A as solid and dashed is the for the seven-loop–six-gap LGR with and without end-sections, respectively. With the end-sections in place, the LGR field over the region-of-interest is calculated to be 67% uniform in (solid line), whereas the resonator without the end-sections is 30% uniform (dashed line). Additionally, for continuous-wave experiments, the applied 100 kHz field modulation is calculated to be 98% uniform over the region-of-interest, shown in Fig. 9B. Data measured is shown as circles (●) and connected by a dash-dot line.
Figure 9.
A) Normalized showing simulated data for the uniform field LGR (solid) and same LGR geometry without enhanced end-sections (dash). Measured data points shown (●). B) Normalized 100 kHz field modulation Bm showing simulated LGR with optimized field modulation slots (solid). Measured data points shown (●). Dash-dot lines are used to connect data points and vertical lines define the region-of-interest. Experiments were performed at 10 mu microwave power and over-modulated field modulation at 0.1 mT at 100 kHz. Normalized is measured as peak-to-peak EPR signal and Bm is measured in change of linewidth.
5. Discussion
The five-loop–four-gap LGR in Ref. 6, as shown in Table 2, sets the standard. Here, we see an increase in both EPR signal saturable and unsaturable samples when using the seven-loop–six-gap LGR described in this work. This increase is due to two reasons. The first is the increase of volume using larger PTFE capillary diameter and length. The second is the uniformity, shown by the Λave-to-Λmax ratio of 0.90. In contrast, the five-loop–four-gap LGR has a Λave-to-Λmax ratio of 0.45. The low Λave-to-Λmax ratio can be attributed to the 0.65 mm sample diameter and 1 mm overall height. However, the increase of the volume lowers the overall Q0-value of the resonator and the larger inner diameter lowers the efficiency parameter. Overall, the seven-loop–six-loop LGR was found to be a good compromise in sample handling and degassing, resonator efficiency, and EPR signal. An example of degassing capabilities can be found in Ref. [14]
Due to the larger inner diameter and overall length of the seven-loop–six-gap LGR, the uniformity of the microwave magnetic field would be very poor if there were no end-sections correcting the microwave magnetic field profile, shown in Fig. 9A as a dashed line. The enhanced end-sections provide this adjustment shown in Fig. 9A as a solid line. The measured uniformity of both the microwave magnetic field, shown in Fig. 9A (data points as ●; dash-dot), and 100 kHz magnetic field, shown in Fig. 9B (data points as ●; dash-dot), shows very good agreement with the simulated data (solid line).
The rectangular TEU02 cavity has a Λave-to-Λmax ratio of 0.87, while the typical cylindrical TE011 cavity has a ratio of 0.6, which is consistent with a cosine distribution. The lower uniformity ratio for the TEU02 is due to the sample shield size needed to hold the sample. The shield creates a local roll-off region, shown in Fig. 3B. Additionally, this resonator has a lower efficiency parameter compared to the cylindrical TE011 cavity due to an extended region-of-interest that is larger than a wavelength. This was described in the seminal uniform field papers [1–3, 5] and is due to the decrease in stored energy over the larger volume.
The extension of the null-index direction creates the potential for higher-order modes to form in the oversized waveguide. The use of a dual iris in the rectangular TEU02 cavity decreases the coupling of neighboring modes that would degrade the microwave cross-section. Additionally, the use of the long-slot iris minimizes the perturbation in the cut-off region allowing the 6 mm region-of-interest in the z-direction. Ansys HFSS simulations show that a round iris significantly perturbs the mode and a uniform field mode is not possible.
Although the rectangular TEU02 cavity has no modulation slots, continuous-wave experiments can be performed using a low frequency (433 Hz) field modulation with little degradation to the continuous-wave EPR signal [15]. The uniformity of the field modulation was simulated to be 70% uniform over the region-of-interest.
6. Conclusion
A seven-loop–six-gap LGR with enhanced end-sections and optimized 100 kHz field modulation slots has been designed for better quantitative experiments of samples that require degassing or larger sample volumes. This resonator is a good compromise of efficiency and Q0-value for an increase in EPR signal intensity. The uniformity has been calculated and measured to be 90% for magnetic field and 98% for 100 kHz field modulation.
The rectangular TEU02 resonator provides a plane of uniform microwave magnetic field incident on a 0.1 × 2 × 6 mm3 sample. The use of evanescent slots to allow 90% light to radiate the sample has been successfully implemented and tested with a rose bengal sample in ascorbate. A dual iris coupling system has been designed to significantly reduce coupling to neighboring modes that degrade the uniform fields providing an improvement in EPR concentration sensitivity.
Two new W-band uniform field cavities are introduced
A seven-loop—six-gap loop-gap resonator with enhanced end-sections
A rectangular TEU02 resonator with light-access slots
Design methodology, fabrication, and EPR experimental results are discussed
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants EB001417, EB002052, and EB001980 (National Biomedical EPR Center) from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Mett RR, Froncisz W, Hyde JS. Axially uniform resonant cavity modes for potential use in electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Rev Sci Instrum. 2001;72(11):4188–4200. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson JR, Mett RR, Hyde JS. Cavities with axially uniform fields for use in electron paramagnetic resonance. II. free space generalization. Rev Sci Instrum. 2002;73(8):3027–3037. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hyde JS, Mett RR, Anderson JR. Cavities with axially uniform fields for use in electron paramagnetic resonance. III. re-entrant geometries. Rev Sci Instrum. 2002;73(11):4003–4009. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hyde JS, Mett RR, Froncisz W, Anderson JR. Cavity resonator for electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy having axially uniform field. US Patent 6,828,789. 2004 Dec 7;
- 5.Mett RR, Sidabras JW, Hyde JS. Uniform radio fields in loop-gap resonators for EPR spectroscopy. Appl Magn Reson. 2007;31:573–589. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sidabras JW, Mett RR, Froncisz W, Camenisch TG, Anderson JR, Hyde JS. Multipurpose EPR loop-gap resonator and cylindrical TE011 cavity for aqueous samples at 94 GHz. Rev Sci Instrum. 2007;78(3):034701. doi: 10.1063/1.2709746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hyde JS, Froncisz W, Sidabras JW, Camenisch TG, Anderson JR, Strangeway RA. Microwave frequency modulation in CW EPR at W-band using a loop-gap resonator. J Magn Reson. 2007;185(2):259–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Froncisz W, Camenisch TG, Ratke JJ, Anderson JR, Subczynski WK, Strangeway RA, Sidabras JW, Hyde JS. Saturation recovery EPR and ELDOR at W-band for spin labels. J Magn Reson. 2008;193(2):297–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sidabras JW, Richie JE, Hyde JS. Axially uniform magnetic field-modulation excitation for electron paramagnetic resonance in rectangular and cylindrical cavities by slot cutting. J Magn Reson. 2017;274:115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eaton G, Eaton S, Barr D, Weber R. Quantitative EPR. Springer Vienna; Wein, Germany: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rempel RC, Ward CE, Sullivan RT, St Clair MW, Weaver HE. Gyromagnetic resonance method and apparatus. US Patent 3,122,703. 1959 Dec 21;
- 12.Schweiger A, Jeschke G. Principles of Pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance. Oxford University Press; New York: 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tait CE, Stoll S. Endor with band-selective shaped inversion pulses. J Magn Res. 2017;277:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mainali L, Sidabras JW, Camenisch TG, Ratke JJ, Raguz M, Hyde JS, Subczynski WK. Spin-label W-band EPR with seven-loop–six-gap resonator: Application to lens membranes derived from eyes of a single donor. Appl Magn Reson. 2014;45(12):1343–1358. doi: 10.1007/s00723-014-0578-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Strangeway RA, Sidabras JW, Radke J, Camenisch T, Hyde JS. Broadband W-band rapid frequency sweep considerations for fourier transform EPR. Cell Biochem Biophys. doi: 10.1007/s12013-017-0804-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hyde JS, Froncisz W. Loop-gap resonators. In: Hoff AJ, editor. Advanced EPR: Applications in Biology and Biochemistry. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1989. pp. 277–306. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hyde JS, Sidabras JW, Mett RR. Resonators for multifrequency EPR of spin labels. In: Misra SK, editor. Multifrequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Theory and Applications. Ch 5.2. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA; Weinheim, Germany: 2011. pp. 244–269. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ramo S, Whinnery J, Van Duzer T. Fields and Waves in Communication Electronics. Wiley; Canada: 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mett RR, Sidabras JW, Hyde JS. Coupling of waveguide and resonator by inductive and capacitive irises for EPR spectroscopy. Appl Magn Reson. 2009;35(2):285–318. doi: 10.1007/s00723-008-0162-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mett RR, Hyde JS. Microwave leakage from field modulation slots in TE011 electron paramagnetic resonance cavities. Rev Sci Instrum. 2005;76:014702. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sato H, Ikeya M. Electron spin resonance of ascorbyl (vitamin C) radicals in synthetic CaCO3 by UV irradiation. J Appl Phys. 2003;42:428–433. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sarna T, Zajac J, Bowman MK, Truscott TG. Photoinduced electron transfer reactions of Rose bengal and selected electron donors. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem. 1991;60:295–310. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lambert C, Sarna T, Truscott TG. Rose bengal radicals and their reactivity. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans. 1990;86(23):3879–3882. [Google Scholar]