Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0192447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192447

Implication of trans-11,trans-13 conjugated linoleic acid in the development of hepatic steatosis

Barbara D Pachikian 1, Céline Druart 1, Emilie Catry 1, Laure B Bindels 1, Audrey M Neyrinck 1, Yvan Larondelle 2, Patrice D Cani 1,3, Nathalie M Delzenne 1,*
Editor: Hervé Guillou4
PMCID: PMC5794163  PMID: 29389988

Abstract

Scope

Conjugated linoleic acids are linoleic acid isomers found in the diet that can also be produced through bacterial metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Our objective was to evaluate the contribution of fatty acid metabolites produced from polyunsaturated fatty acids by the gut microbiota in vivo to regulation of hepatic lipid metabolism and steatosis.

Methods and results

In mice with depleted n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, we observed an accumulation of trans-11,trans-13 CLA and cis-9,cis-11 conjugated linoleic acids in the liver tissue that were associated with an increased triglyceride content and expression of lipogenic genes. We used an in vitro model to evaluate the impact of these two conjugated linoleic acids on hepatic lipid metabolism. In HepG2 cells, we observed that only trans-11,trans-13 conjugated linoleic acids recapitulated triglyceride accumulation and increased lipogenic gene expression, which is a phenomenon that may implicate the nuclear factors sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c) and carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP).

Conclusion

The trans-11,trans-13 conjugated linoleic acids can stimulate hepatic lipogenesis, which supports the conclusion that gut microbiota and related metabolites should be considered in the treatment of non-alcoholic liver disease.

Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease represents a major worldwide health problem with a prevalence of 20% in the general population that increases up to 70% in obese and type 2 diabetic subjects [1]. The first stage of the disease involves the accumulation of triglycerides (TG) in the liver, which is relatively benign. However, approximately 15% of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease cases evolve into hepatic inflammation (steatohepatitis) and fibrosis, and these cases can further progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer [2].

During the last decade, several studies have demonstrated that gut microbiota can regulate liver metabolism and fat storage [3, 4]. Colonization of germ-free mice with gut microbiota harvested from conventionally raised mice leads to increased body fat mass and hepatic TG content [5]. This accumulation of hepatic TG following colonization is attributed to a stimulation of de novo fatty acid synthesis, which is mainly controlled by a transcription factor called sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) [5]; however, several other transcription factors, such as the Liver X Receptor, could also play a role [6, 7]. However, the molecular mechanisms explaining how gut microbes can interact with lipid metabolism in the liver remain largely unknown. The gut microbiota produce several metabolites that are able to regulate hepatic lipid metabolism, such as short chain fatty acids or secondary bile acids [8]. We and other researchers have recently found that the gut microbiota can also metabolize polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) into conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) [911]. CLAs represent a heterogeneous group of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid (LA) [12]. CLAs are mainly synthesized from free LA through the actions of bacterial isomerases in a process called biohydrogenation [13, 14]. This process was described in the rumen, but it is now recognized that human gut bacteria can perform fatty acid biohydrogenation [1517]. The major pathway for LA biohydrogenation leads to the formation of the intermediate cis-9,trans-11 CLA. In addition to cis-9,trans-11 CLA, several other CLA isomers, such as trans-10,cis-12 CLA have been described as intermediates of LA biohydrogenation [18].

When taken as a dietary supplement, CLAs exhibit numerous beneficial health effects that are sometimes dependent on the isomer, including anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory and anti-obesity effects [12, 17]. Nevertheless, these beneficial effects are, in some instances, associated with adverse effects, such as adipose tissue inflammation [19, 20] or hepatic steatosis, which occurs following stimulation of fatty acid synthesis [2123]. However, controversies exist since some isomers also induce concomitant activation of the fatty acid oxidative pathway [24, 25]. It has been shown that dietary treatment with CLAs, specifically with trans-10,cis-12 CLA, can modify the gut microbiota composition, which is a phenomenon linked to the occurrence of steatosis [26]. However, no studies have tried to unravel which CLA moieties issued from the transformation by the gut microbiota can play a role in the regulation of fatty acid metabolism in the liver.

Feeding mice with a sunflower-diet exhibiting a low ratio in n-3/n-6 PUFA, without changing total saturated or monounsaturated fatty acids in the diet, leads to n-3 PUFA depletion and hepatic accumulation of lipids [27, 28]. This mouse model is quite interesting since it is linked to a stimulation of hepatic fatty acid synthesis, regulated by SREBP-1c, as observed in the livers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients [28]. In this study, we demonstrate that two specific CLAs produced by the gut microbiota accumulate in the liver of n-3 PUFA-depleted mice. Our data from in vivo and in vitro experiments indicate that trans-11,trans-13 CLA is a key bacterial metabolite responsible for the induction of lipogenesis and ultimately hepatic lipid accumulation.

Materials and methods

Reagents

LA, cis-9,trans-11 CLA, cis-9,cis-11 CLA and trans-11,trans-13 CLA isomers were purchased from Larodan Fine Chemicals AB (Malmö, Sweden). FBS was purchased from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), Trypsin-EDTA 0.25% and penicillin-streptomycin were purchased from Gibco (Inchinnan, Scotland). Fatty acid free bovine serum albumin (BSA), esiRNA human SREBF1 and esiRNA targeting RLUC were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO, United States).

Animals and diets

Male C57Bl/6J mice (9 weeks old; Charles River, Brussels, Belgium) were housed in groups of 4 mice per cage at 22°C in a 12 h light/dark cycle and given free access to food and water.

After an acclimatization period of 1 week, mice were fed a control diet (CT) (D08041805, Research Diets, New Brunswick, USA) or an n-3 PUFA-depleted diet (DEF) (D08041806, Research Diets, New Brunswick, USA) for 1 month (CT-1 and DEF-1) or 3 months (CT-3 and DEF-3). The n-3 PUFA depletion was induced by replacing the soybean oil with sunflower oil (S1 Table). The total monounsaturated fatty acid and saturated fatty acid contents were similar to the CT diet, and the only difference was the n-3/n-6 PUFA ratio (S2 Table) [28]. At the end of the study period, mice fed the CT (CT-1, n = 9; CT-3, n = 4) and DEF (DEF-1, n = 9; DEF-3, n = 7) diets were anaesthetized (ketamine/xylazine i.p. at 100 and 10 mg/kg of body weight, respectively). The liver tissue was immediately clamped in liquid N2 and kept at -80°C until analysis. The mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation. All mouse experiments were approved by the local ethics committee for animal care of the Health Sector of the Université catholique de Louvain under the supervision of Prof. F. Lemaigre and Prof. JP Dehoux, and the housing conditions were specified by the Belgian Law of May 29, 2013, regarding the protection of laboratory animals (agreement no. LA1230314).

Preparation of Albumin-bound CLAs

CLAs were conjugated to BSA following the modified protocol of Lee et al. [29]. A stock solution for each of the investigated CLA (3.5 mM to 14 mM) was prepared in ethanol, and aliquots were stored at −20°C. After evaporation of ethanol under nitrogen gas, 0.15 M KOH was added, and the vials were vortexed and then incubated for 1 h at 70°C. During this incubation, the vials were further vortexed for 5, 20 and 40 minutes. At the end of the incubation, filter sterilized defatted BSA in PBS (1 mM) was added to the vials to make a final CLA concentration of 5 Mm, and the vials were incubated for 1 h in a sonication bath. The pH level was adjusted to 7.0–7.5. The BSA-conjugated CLA isomers and the BSA control were stored at −20°C in tubes protected from light and evacuated under nitrogen gas.

HepG2 cell culture and treatment

HepG2 cells (ECACC, Salisbury, UK) were cultivated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Twenty-four hours after plating, the cells were incubated for 24 h with one of the BSA-conjugated CLA at a final concentration of 100 μM or 10 μM. These concentrations were chosen based on previous results of studying the effects of CLA isomers on lipogenesis in HepG2 cells [21].

Biochemical analyses in the liver tissue and in HepG2 cells

CLAs content was measured from liver tissue by a gas–liquid chromatograph (Focus GC, Thermo-Finnigan, Milan, Italy) equipped with a flame ionization detector after Folch extraction, as reported before [11]. For lipid content measurement in liver tissue (100 mg), lipids were extracted as described before [30]. For lipid content measurement in cultured cells (6-well plate, plated at a density of 1.3x106 cells/well), lipids were extracted following the Bligh and Dyer method [31]. TG content was measured using kits from Diasys Diagnostic and Systems (Holzheim, Germany).

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was isolated from liver tissue (50 mg) and cultured cells (6-well plate, plated at a density of 1.3x106 cells/well) using the TriPure reagent (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription of 1 μg total RNA using the Kit Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands). Real-time qPCRs were performed with a StepOnePlusTM instrument and software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using Mesa Fast qPCR MasterMix (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) as described [32]. Ribosomal protein L19 (RPL19) RNA was chosen as a housekeeping gene. The primer sequences are described in the S3 Table.

siRNA transfection

HepG2 cells were seeded at 0.5 × 106 cells/well in 6-well plates. After overnight incubation at 37°C, the cells were transfected with 25 nM siRNA or Renilla luciferase negative control (RLUC). The transfection reagent DharmaFECTTM (Dharmacon, Colorado, United States) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Twenty-four hours after the transfection, cells were incubated for 24 h with 10 μM of trans-11,trans-13 CLA.

Cell proliferation assay

The cell growth assay is based on metabolically active cells cleaving yellow thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) to form purple formazan crystals. The formazan absorbance was measured at 570 nm, from which a background value, which was measured at 650 nm, was subtracted. Cell proliferation is expressed as a percentage of the value obtained for cells incubated with the vehicle (BSA).

Statistical analyses

Results are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed with a Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA with Tukey or Dunnett’s post-hoc test using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows. Associations between variables were assessed by a Pearson correlation test. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Trans-11,trans-13 and cis-9,cis-11 CLAs are the main isoforms present in the livers of mice fed a sunflower oil-based diet leading to hepatic lipid accumulation and are positively correlated with the expression of genes controlling fatty acid synthesis

We fed mice for one month or three months with a sunflower-based diet (DEF) or a soybean-based diet (CT). The sunflower-based diet had a lower n-3/n-6 PUFA ratio than the soybean-based diet leading to n-3 PUFA depletion in the liver for both DEF-1 and DEF-3 mice (Table 1). n-3 PUFA depletion also led to hepatic accumulation of monounsaturated fatty acids after only 3 months of feeding.

Table 1. Hepatic fatty acid profile of mice.

Composition CT-1 DEF-1 CT-3 DEF-3
C16:0 23.87 ± 0.209 23.69 ± 0.245 23.35 ± 0.312 23.51 ± 0.719
C18:0 10.78 ± 0.642 11.07 ± 0.569 7.563 ± 0.809 6.629 ± 0.287
C20:0 0.155 ± 0.011 0.151 ± 0.007 0.375 ± 0.096 0.2998 ± 0.038
C22:0 0.034 ± 0.003 0.024 ± 0.003* 0.139 ± 0.043 0.047 ± 0.009*
C16:1 cis-9 2.352 ± 0.197 2.512 ± 0.241 4.109 ± 0.395 4.457 ± 0.263
C16 :1 trans-9 0.010 ± 0.001 0.009 ± 0.001 0.000 ± 0.000 0.000 ± 0.000
C18:1 cis-9 15.72 ± 1.109 17.96 ± 0.928 22.15 ± 2.145 36.91 ± 0.776*
C18 :1 cis-11 2.231 ± 0.129 2.728 ± 0.129* 3.495 ± 0.432 5.735 ± 0.223*
C18 :1 trans-9 0.033 ± 0.001 0.042 ± 0.002* 0.081 ± 0.003 0.108 ± 0.012
C18 :1 trans-10 0.004 ± 0.000 0.004 ± 0.000 0.000 ± 0.000 0.000 ± 0.000
C18 :1 trans-11 0.044 ± 0.005 0.049 ± 0.002 0.091 ± 0.020 0.043 ± 0.008*
C18:2 n-6 21.55 ± 0.599 21.52 ± 0.567 22.17 ± 0.241 10.96 ± 0.293*
C20 :4 n-6 12.81 ± 0.662 16.20 ± 0.743* 8.708 ± 1.226 9.494 ± 0.329
C18:3 n-3 0.741 ± 0.068 0.145 ± 0.008* 0.944 ± 0.054 0.217 ± 0.009*
C20 :5 n-3 0.0321 ± 0.012 0.030 ± 0.002* 0.239 ± 0.028 0.050 ± 0.005*
C22 :5 n-3 0.429 ± 0.017 0.063 ± 0.004* 0.308 ± 0.032 0.023 ± 0.002*
C22 :6 n-3 8.799 ± 0.355 3.662 ± 0.245* 6.167 ± 0.727 1.280 ± 0.071*
C18:2 cis-9,trans-11 0.035 ± 0.002 0.035 ± 0.002 0.048 ± 0.002 0.049 ± 0.001
C18:2 trans-10,cis-12 0.017 ± 0.001 0.017 ± 0.001 0.008 ± 0.001 0.003 ± 0.001*
C18:2 cis-9,cis-11 0.017 ± 0.002 0.026 ± 0.003* 0.029 ± 0.001 0.079 ± 0.004*
C18:2 trans-11,trans-13 0.015 ± 0.002 0.029 ± 0.002* 0.032 ± 0.006 0.107 ± 0.004*
C18:2 trans-9,trans-11 0.020 ± 0.003 0.036 ± 0.003* 0.005 ± 0.003 0.000 ± 0.000

Fatty acid profile (expressed as % of identified fatty acids) in mice fed a control (CT-1, n = 9; CT-3, n = 4) or an n-3 PUFA-depleted diet during one (DEF-1, n = 9) or three months (DEF-3, n = 7).

Data are the means ± SEM.

*p<0.05 versus CT mice (Student’s t-test).

We observed no modifications in the level of the two most studied CLAs, specifically cis-9,trans-11 CLA and trans-10,cis-12 CLA, between CT and DEF mice. However, we observed at least a two-fold increase in cis-9,cis-11 CLA and trans-11,trans-13 CLA in the livers of both DEF-1 and DEF-3 (Table 1) mice compared to CT mice, which showed the highest levels of CLAs in the livers of DEF mice. Interestingly, cis-9,cis-11 CLA and trans-11,trans-13 CLA were not detected in the DEF diet (S2 Table).

Because cis-9,cis-11 and trans-11,trans-13 CLAs were the only isoforms increased in both DEF-1 and DEF-3 mice, we decided to focus on them for the next investigation. Both DEF-1 and DEF-3 mice exhibited an increased expression of lipogenic genes in the liver. However, hepatic lipid accumulation was observed only after 3 months of depletion (Table 2).

Table 2. Hepatic mRNA content and TG levels in mice with depleted n-3 PUFA.

CT-1 DEF-1 CT-3 DEF-3
SREBP-1c 1.09 ± 0.15 1.65 ± 0.19* 1.03 ± 0.15 1.66 ± 0.32
FAS 1.04 ± 0.11 1.88 ± 0.08* 1.04 ± 0.16 2.37 ± 0.21*
SCD-1 1.21 ± 0.23 1.78 ± 0.37 1.02 ± 0.12 1.41 ± 0.08*
ACCα 1.08 ± 0.16 1.73 ± 0.21* 1.02 ± 0.10 1.53 ± 0.23*
Hepatic TG 91.44 ± 5.09 93.14 ± 11.05 86.03 ± 3.29 128.4 ± 13.58*

Hepatic content in TG (expressed as nmol/mg of protein) and in sterol-regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c), fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase α (ACCα) mRNA (expressed as relative expression) in mice fed a control (CT-1, n = 9; CT-3, n = 4) or an n-3 PUFA-depleted diet for one (DEF-1, n = 9) or three months (DEF-3, n = 7).

Data are the means ± SEM.

*p<0.05 versus CT mice (Student’s t-test).

Both cis-9,cis-11 and trans-11,trans-13 CLAs correlated positively with the hepatic level of TG and with the expression of key genes involved in fatty acid synthesis and regulated by SREBP-1c (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Correlations between hepatic CLAs content and mRNA expression of lipogenic genes or TG level.

Fig 1

Correlation between the hepatic level of cis-9,cis-11 and trans-11,trans-13 CLAs and hepatic expression of genes involved in fatty acid synthesis as well as TG level in mice fed a control (CT-1, n = 9; CT-3, n = 4) or an n-3 PUFA-depleted diet for one (DEF-1, n = 9) or three months (DEF-3, n = 7). Data represent correlation coefficient; r. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 (Pearson’s correlation test).

Trans-11,trans-13 CLA but not cis-9,cis-11 CLA supplementation increased the expression of genes involved in fatty acid synthesis and led to TG accumulation in vitro

Because cis-9,cis-11 CLA and trans-11,trans-13 CLA accumulation occurred in the livers of mice exhibiting hepatic lipid accumulation, we decided to validate the results in vitro using HepG2 cells to examine the effects of a supplementation with these two conjugated fatty acids on lipid metabolism. The effects were compared to results from the precursor LA and the most abundant CLA found in the liver of CT mice, specifically cis-9,trans-11 CLA (Table 1).

We used qPCR to measure the expression of key enzymes involved in the fatty acid synthesis pathway that are regulated by the transcription factor SREBP-1c (Fig 2).

Fig 2. mRNA expression of lipogenic genes in HepG2 cells following CLAs treatment.

Fig 2

HepG2 cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with 10 μM of LA, cis-9,trans-11 (c9t11) CLA, cis-9,cis-11 (c9c11) CLA or trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA for 24 h. The mRNA expression of sterol-regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c), SREBP-1a, fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1), acetyl-CoA carboxylase α (ACCα), and fatty acid elongase 6 (Elolv6) were measured by qPCR and expressed as relative expression. Data are the means ± SEM of 2 independent experiments (n = 6 to 12). Data with no common superscript letter are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to the post-hoc ANOVA statistical analysis.

Trans-11,trans-13 CLA increased the expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl-Coenzyme A desaturase 1 (SCD-1), acetyl-CoA carboxylase α (ACCα) and fatty acid elongase 6 (Elovl6) compared to the control, cis-9,trans-11 CLA and LA conditions. This result was associated with a higher expression of SREBP-1c but with SREBP-1a. The cis-9,cis-11 CLA had no effect on the expression of these genes and showed a slight stimulating effect on SREBP-1a expression. Both trans-11,trans-13 CLA and cis-9,cis-11 CLA did not modify the hepatic TG content after 24 h of supplementation, but increased TG accumulation after 72 h of incubation (Fig 3).

Fig 3. TG content in HepG2 cells following CLAs treatment.

Fig 3

HepG2 cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with 10 μM of linoleic acid (LA), cis-9,trans-11 (c9ct11) CLA, cis-9,cis-11 (c9c11) CLA or trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA for 24 h and 72 h. Hepatic TG content was expressed as nmol/mg of protein. Data are the means ± SEM of 2 independent experiments (n = 6). Data with no common superscript letter are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to the post-hoc ANOVA statistical analysis.

Interestingly, the increase in the expression of lipogenic genes was stronger following an incubation with 100 μM of trans-11,trans-13 CLA (S1 Fig), but this concentration leads to cell toxicity in the MTT test (S2 Fig).

Possible implications of the two transcription factors SREBP-1c and Chrebp in the lipogenic effects induced by trans-11,trans-13 CLA supplementation

As observed in mice with hepatic lipid accumulation, we could relate trans-11,trans-13 CLA to activation of the transcription factor SREBP-1c in HepG2 cells. To study the role of SREBP-1 in this context further, we decided to knock down SREBP-1 using SREBP-1 siRNA. Unfortunately, despite several controls using scrambled sequences, there was increased expression of lipogenic genes, which masked the effects of CLA treatment. However, we observed blocking of SREBP-1 expression by SREBP-1 siRNA, and only Elovl6 expression was decreased and was not affected by trans-11,trans-13 CLA treatment (S3 Fig). Two other transcription factors, LXR and carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP), were pointed by previous microarray analysis in the liver of n-3 PUFA depleted mice for three months. Therefore, we quantify by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells, the expression of key LXR and ChREBP target genes following trans-11,trans-13 CLA supplementation. Trans-11,trans-13 CLA supplementation led to a higher expression of L-PK and G6Pase, which are two specific ChREBP target genes (Fig 4), whereas no effect was observed on the expression of two key LXR target genes, specifically PLTP and cyp7a1, which suggests that the ChREBP pathway rather than the LXR pathway could be involved (S4 Fig).

Fig 4. mRNA expression of carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP) target genes in HepG2 cells following CLA treatment.

Fig 4

HepG2 cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with 10 μM of linoleic acid (LA), cis-9,trans-11 (c9t11) CLA, cis-9,cis-11 (c9c11) CLA or trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA for 24 h. The mRNA expression of liver pyruvate kinase (L-PK) and glucose-6 phosphatase (G6Pase) were measured by qPCR and expressed as relative expression. Data are the means ± SEM of 2 independent experiments (n = 6 to 12). Data with different superscript letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to the post-hoc ANOVA statistical analysis.

Discussion

Several recent studies have showed that the gut microbiota is an important factor that should be taken into account when studying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [33, 34]. Specifically, the metabolites that it can produce appear to regulate hepatic fatty acid metabolism [35]. In our study, we found a new bacterial CLA associated with increased lipogenesis and hepatic TG accumulation in a model of nutritional depletion in n-3 PUFA (DEF mice).

Starting from LA, the major bacterial biohydrogenation pathway described by previous studies leads to the formation of cis-9,trans-11 CLA [13, 18]. In our study, the content of cis-9,trans-11 CLA was unchanged in the liver of DEF mice compared to CT mice. In contrast, two other CLA isomers seemed to be potentially relevant since the contents in cis-9,cis-11 CLA and trans-11,trans-13 CLA were almost doubled in the liver of DEF mice compared to CT mice, which became the most represented CLAs.

These two CLAs were undetectable in the DEF diet, which supports their bacterial origin. Accordingly, a recent article has shown that trans-11,trans-13 CLA was not found in the colonic content of germ-free mice, which supports the role of the gut microbiota in the accumulation of trans-11,trans-13 CLA in host tissues [10]. In our previous study [27], we described an increased level of Roseburia sp. in the cecal content of n-3 PUFA-depleted mice. Roseburia spp. are known to be involved in the production of several CLAs and could therefore be involved in the higher production of trans-11,trans-13 CLA. However, the bacteria involved in the production of trans-11,trans-13 CLA from precursors remains unexplored.

Interestingly, cis-9,cis-11 CLA and trans-11,trans-13 CLA both are both positively correlated with the hepatic TG content and with the expression of several enzymes involved in fatty acid synthesis that are regulated by the transcription factor SREBP-1c. These positive correlations were observed in the livers of both mice exhibiting TG accumulation (after three months of n-3 PUFA depletion) and before TG accumulation (one month of n-3 PUFA depletion). Specific fatty acids, such as monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), are also able to stimulate lipogenesis [36]. However, C18:1 cis-11 was the only MUFA increased in the livers of DEF mice, and the correlations with the expression of lipogenic genes and hepatic TG content were poor. Indeed, in the liver of mice fed an n-3 PUFA-depleted diet for 3 months, we observed no correlation between C18:1 cis-11 content and SREBP-1c (0.403, p = 0.219), FAS (0.579, p = 0.06), SCD-1 (0.343, p = 0.302) and ACCα (r = 0.291, p = 0.385). There was a significant correlation of C18:1 cis-11 content only with hepatic TG content (r = 0.705, p = 0.015). In the livers of mice fed the CT and DEF diets for one month, we observed a positive correlation between C18:1 cis-11 and FAS (r = 0.735, p = 0.0005) and ACCα (r = 0.510, p = 0.03), but not with SREBP-1c (r = 0.415, p = 0.09), SCD-1 (r = 0.457, p = 0.06) and hepatic lipid content (r = 0.215, p = 0.39).

Therefore, neither the rise in total lipid in the liver nor the rise in C18:1 cis-11 seems to be involved in the stimulation of lipogenesis in the livers of n-3 PUFA-depleted mice.

In HepG2 cells, we found that trans-11,trans-13 CLA was the unique isomer increasing the expression of key enzymes involved in the fatty acid synthesis pathway, specifically SCD-1, FAS, Elovl6 and ACCα after 24 h, whereas cis-9,cis-11 CLA had no effect. The stimulation of hepatic lipogenesis following trans-11,trans-13 CLA supplementation for 72 h led to an accumulation of TG. It should be mentioned that LA supplementation also increases TG content in HepG2 cells after 72 h without modifying the expression of lipogenic genes. Therefore, we could not exclude the implications of the long-term supply of fatty acids on lipid accumulation. Additionally, the accumulation of TG observed after LA supplementation was always less than the accumulation observed after trans-11,trans-13 CLA supplementation.

If the isomer cis-9,trans-11 CLA has been shown to reduce hepatic TG content in several rodent models of steatosis [37, 38], these beneficial effects have not been reported for all isomers. Indeed, trans-10,cis-12 CLA supplementation can paradoxically induce an increase in hepatic lipid content through stimulation of the lipogenic pathway and modification of fatty acid export [21, 24, 39]. This adverse effect could be attributed to a deficiency in n-3 PUFA induced by trans-10,cis-12 CLA supplementation [40]. For the first time, we described a steatogenic role for the trans-11,trans-13 CLA in liver cells.

This activation of the lipogenic pathway in the liver of mice fed for one or three months with a sunflower-based diet, which had a low n-3/n-6 PUFA ratio, was related to an activation of the transcription factor called SREBP-1c [28]. Moreover, in those mice, the hepatic content of trans-11,trans-13 CLA was positively correlated with the expression of SREBP-1c and of its target genes.

SREBP-1c belongs to a family of basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper (bHLH-LZ) transcription factors and is a crucial regulator of fatty acid synthesis. There are three isoforms for SREBPs: SREBP-2 and 1a are primarily involved in the regulation of the cholesterol synthesis pathway, whereas SREBP-1c is mainly involved in the regulation of the fatty acid synthesis pathway [41]. In the liver tissue, SREBP-1c has been identified as the main isoform, while SREBP-1a is predominant in cell lines like HepG2 [31]. Consistent with the observations, trans-11,trans-13 CLA also selectively increased the expression of SREBP-1c in HepG2 cells, whereas the expression of the isoform SREBP-1a was unchanged, which suggested SREBP-1c was involved in the effect produced by trans-11,trans-13 CLA on the stimulation of fatty acid synthesis. However, after using SREBP-1 siRNA to abrogate the SREBP-1c pathway, we could not confirm the implication of SREBP-1 due to artefact problems.

Several other transcription factors are involved in the regulation of fatty acid synthesis, such as ChREBP [42], LXR, farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and PPARβ/δ [7]. LXR, regulated by oxysterols, stimulates fatty acid synthesis and is involved in the activation of the SREBP-1c pathway [6, 43]. ChREBP, regulated by glucose, stimulates lipogenesis [42], whereas FXR, regulated by bile acids, inhibits lipogenesis through the induction of the expression of the small heterodimer partner [44]. PPARβ/δ is a transcription factor which, on one hand, inhibits SREBP-1c and, on the other hand, stimulates the synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids to the detriment of saturated fatty acids; a way to protect against lipotoxicity [7].

In a previous study, microarray analyses obtained from the liver of n-3 PUFA depleted mice for three months, in addition to the stimulation of the SREBP-1c pathway, suggested a stimulation of LXR and ChREBP pathways [28]. However, we observed no modification of the expression of key target genes reflecting the activation of any other transcription factor involved in the regulation of the fatty acid synthesis pathway, namely FXR (small heterodimer partner) or PPARβ/δ (st3gal5, Lpin2). In HepG2 cells, we investigated further the effect of trans-11,trans-13 CLA supplementation on LXR and ChREBP pathways as they also seemed activated following the microarray analyses. We observed an increased expression of two ChREBP target genes (L-PK and G6Pase) whereas PLTP and Cyp7a1 expression, two target genes of LXR, was not modified.

Therefore, trans-11,trans-13 CLA is associated with stimulation of both SREBP-1c and ChREBP pathways in both mice and HepG2 cells. However, further studies are warranted to investigate the implication of other lipogenic transcription factors.

Conclusion

We discovered that trans-11,trans-13 CLA issued from gut microbial biohydrogenation had a stimulatory effect on lipogenesis that led to hepatic lipid accumulation by a mechanism involving the activation of nuclear factors that typically respond to insulin and carbohydrates. These results demonstrate the importance of some fatty acid metabolites produced by the gut microbiota in the regulation of gene expression in the livers of hosts as well as the potential role of the microbiota in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. mRNA expression of lipogenic genes in HepG2 cells following CLAs treatment at 100 μM.

HepG2 cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with 100 μM of linoleic acid (LA), cis-9,trans-11 (c9t11) CLA, cis-9,cis-11 (c9c11) CLA or trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA for 24 h. The mRNA expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1), acetyl-CoA carboxylase α (ACCα), fatty acid elongase 6 (Elolv6) were measured by qPCR and expressed as relative expression. Data are the means ± SEM of 7 independent experiments (n = 4 to 14). Data with no common superscript letter are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to the post-hoc ANOVA statistical analysis.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. HepG2 cell viability following CLAs treatment.

HepG2 cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with linoleic acid (LA), cis-9,trans-11 (c9t11) CLA, cis-9,cis-11 (c9c11) CLA or trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Cell viability was determined by an MTT assay and expressed as % of surviving cells compared to control cells. Data are the means ± SEM of 2 independent experiments (n = 4 to 14). * Significantly different from the BSA control condition (p ≤ 0.05) according to a Student’s t-test analysis.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. mRNA expression of lipogenic genes following CLA treatment in HepG2 cells with a knockdown for SREBP-1.

HepG2 cells were transfected with SREBP-1 siRNA. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with 10 μM of trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA during 24 h. The mRNA expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c), SREBP-1a, fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1), acetyl-CoA carboxylase α (ACCα), fatty acid elongase 6 (Elolv6) were measured by qPCR and expressed as relative expression. Data are the means ± SEM of 2 independent experiments (n = 4 to 8). * Significantly different from the scramble (RLUC) condition (p ≤ 0.05) according to a Student’s t-test statistical analysis.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. mRNA expression of Liver X Receptor (LXR) target genes in HepG2 cells following CLA treatment.

HepG2 cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with 10 μM of linoleic acid (LA), or trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA for 24 h. The mRNA expression of phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) and CYP7A1 cytochrome P450 family 7 subfamily A member 1 (Cyp7a1) were measured by qPCR and expressed as relative expression. Data are the means ± SEM (n = 6). Data with different superscript letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to the post-hoc ANOVA statistical analysis.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Diet composition.

Formulated by Research Diets. Parenthetical numbers indicate the manufacturer's diet number.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Diet fatty acid pattern.

Fatty acid composition of CT and DEF diet expressed as % of total fatty acid of the diet. ND = not detectable.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. The primer sequences used for real-time quantitative PCR.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Bouazza Es Saadi, Véronique Allaeys and Remi Selleslagh for skilful technical assistance.

Abbreviations

ACCα

acetyl-CoA carboxylase α

BSA

free fatty acid bovine serum albumin

ChREBP

carbohydrate responsive element binding protein

ChREBP

carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein

CLA

conjugated linoleic acid

Elovl6

fatty acid elongase 6

FAS

fatty acid synthase

G6Pase

glucose-6 phosphatase

LA

linoleic acid

L-PK

liver pyruvate kinase

LXR

Liver X Receptor

PUFA

polyunsaturated fatty acid

SCD-1

stearoyl-Coenzyme A desaturase 1

SREBP

sterol regulatory element binding protein

TG

triglyceride

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

NMD is a recipient of grants from FRS-FNRS (Fonds de la recherche scientifique) (convention FRSM 3.4574.07 and FRFC 2.4555.08), from Wallonia supported by the competitive cluster Wagralim (Walnut20) and from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (Mynewgut grant agreement n° 613979). PDC is senior research associate from the FRS-FNRS Belgium and the recipient of grants from FNRS, FRFS-WELBIO under grant: WELBIO-CR-2012S-02R, the Funds Baillet Latour (Grant for Medical Research 2015), and ERC Starting Grant 2013 (Starting grant 336452-ENIGMO). LBB is a postdoctoral fellow from the FRS-FNRS Belgium.

References

  • 1.Sattar N, Forrest E, Preiss D. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMJ. 2014;349:g4596 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4596 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4168663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berlanga A, Guiu-Jurado E, Porras JA, Auguet T. Molecular pathways in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014;7:221–39. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S62831 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4094580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu W, Baker RD, Bhatia T, Zhu L, Baker SS. Pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(10):1969–87. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2161-x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Delarue J, Lalles JP. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Roles of the gut and the liver and metabolic modulation by some dietary factors and especially long-chain n-3 PUFA. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60(1):147–59. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201500346 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Backhed F, Ding H, Wang T, Hooper LV, Koh GY, Nagy A, et al. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(44):15718–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407076101 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC524219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ducheix S, Montagner A, Theodorou V, Ferrier L, Guillou H. The liver X receptor: a master regulator of the gut-liver axis and a target for non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;86(1):96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.03.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tan NS, Vazquez-Carrera M, Montagner A, Sng MK, Guillou H, Wahli W. Transcriptional control of physiological and pathological processes by the nuclear receptor PPARbeta/delta. Prog Lipid Res. 2016;64:98–122. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2016.09.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Delzenne NM, Cani PD, Everard A, Neyrinck AM, Bindels LB. Gut microorganisms as promising targets for the management of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015;58(10):2206–17. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3712-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Raimondi S, Amaretti A, Leonardi A, Quartieri A, Gozzoli C, Rossi M. Conjugated Linoleic Acid Production by Bifidobacteria: Screening, Kinetic, and Composition. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8654317 doi: 10.1155/2016/8654317 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4939342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Druart C, Bindels LB, Schmaltz R, Neyrinck AM, Cani PD, Walter J, et al. Ability of the gut microbiota to produce PUFA-derived bacterial metabolites: Proof of concept in germ-free versus conventionalized mice. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59(8):1603–13. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201500014 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4523425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Druart C, Neyrinck AM, Vlaeminck B, Fievez V, Cani PD, Delzenne NM. Role of the lower and upper intestine in the production and absorption of gut microbiota-derived PUFA metabolites. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87560 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087560 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3903770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim JH, Kim Y, Kim YJ, Park Y. Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Potential Health Benefits as a Functional Food Ingredient. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2016;7:221–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-041715-033028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lee YJ, Jenkins TC. Biohydrogenation of linolenic acid to stearic acid by the rumen microbial population yields multiple intermediate conjugated diene isomers. J Nutr. 2011;141(8):1445–50. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.138396 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Honkanen AM, Leskinen H, Toivonen V, McKain N, Wallace RJ, Shingfield KJ. Metabolism of alpha-linolenic acid during incubations with strained bovine rumen contents: products and mechanisms. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(12):2093–105. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001446 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Russell DA, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C. Metabolic activities and probiotic potential of bifidobacteria. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;149(1):88–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.06.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McIntosh FM, Shingfield KJ, Devillard E, Russell WR, Wallace RJ. Mechanism of conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid formation in human faecal suspensions and pure cultures of intestinal bacteria. Microbiology. 2009;155(Pt 1):285–94. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.022921-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O'Shea EF, Cotter PD, Stanton C, Ross RP, Hill C. Production of bioactive substances by intestinal bacteria as a basis for explaining probiotic mechanisms: bacteriocins and conjugated linoleic acid. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;152(3):189–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.05.025 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jenkins TC, Wallace RJ, Moate PJ, Mosley EE. Board-invited review: Recent advances in biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids within the rumen microbial ecosystem. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(2):397–412. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0588 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pini M, Touch S, Poirier H, Dalmas E, Niot I, Rouault C, et al. Adipose tissue adaptive response to trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid engages alternatively activated M2 macrophages. FASEB J. 2016;30(1):241–51. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-276675 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shen W, Chuang CC, Martinez K, Reid T, Brown JM, Xi L, et al. Conjugated linoleic acid reduces adiposity and increases markers of browning and inflammation in white adipose tissue of mice. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(4):909–22. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M030924 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3605998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Go GW, Oh S, Park M, Gang G, McLean D, Yang HS, et al. t10,c12 conjugated linoleic acid upregulates hepatic de novo lipogenesis and triglyceride synthesis via mTOR pathway activation. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;23(11):1569–76. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mitchell PL, Karakach TK, Currie DL, McLeod RS. t-10, c-12 CLA dietary supplementation inhibits atherosclerotic lesion development despite adverse cardiovascular and hepatic metabolic marker profiles. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52634 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052634 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3527580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Della Casa L, Rossi E, Romanelli C, Gibellini L, Iannone A. Effect of diets supplemented with different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on protein expression in C57/BL6 mice. Genes Nutr. 2016;11:26 doi: 10.1186/s12263-016-0542-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5050585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ferramosca A, Zara V. Modulation of hepatic steatosis by dietary fatty acids. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(7):1746–55. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1746 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3930973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moya-Camarena SY, Vanden Heuvel JP, Blanchard SG, Leesnitzer LA, Belury MA. Conjugated linoleic acid is a potent naturally occurring ligand and activator of PPARalpha. J Lipid Res. 1999;40(8):1426–33. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marques TM, Wall R, O'Sullivan O, Fitzgerald GF, Shanahan F, Quigley EM, et al. Dietary trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid alters fatty acid metabolism and microbiota composition in mice. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(5):728–38. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514004206 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pachikian BD, Essaghir A, Demoulin JB, Catry E, Neyrinck AM, Dewulf EM, et al. Prebiotic approach alleviates hepatic steatosis: implication of fatty acid oxidative and cholesterol synthesis pathways. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57(2):347–59. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200364 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pachikian BD, Essaghir A, Demoulin JB, Neyrinck AM, Catry E, De Backer FC, et al. Hepatic n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid depletion promotes steatosis and insulin resistance in mice: genomic analysis of cellular targets. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23365 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023365 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3154437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee Y, Vanden Heuvel JP. Inhibition of macrophage adhesion activity by 9trans,11trans-conjugated linoleic acid. J Nutr Biochem. 2010;21(6):490–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.02.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226(1):497–509. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37(8):911–7. doi: 10.1139/o59-099 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pachikian BD, Neyrinck AM, Cani PD, Portois L, Deldicque L, De Backer FC, et al. Hepatic steatosis in n-3 fatty acid depleted mice: focus on metabolic alterations related to tissue fatty acid composition. BMC Physiol. 2008;8:21 doi: 10.1186/1472-6793-8-21 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2612019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Marchesi JR, Adams DH, Fava F, Hermes GD, Hirschfield GM, Hold G, et al. The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier. Gut. 2016;65(2):330–9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309990 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4752653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tilg H, Cani PD, Mayer EA. Gut microbiome and liver diseases. Gut. 2016. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312729 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Clarke G, Stilling RM, Kennedy PJ, Stanton C, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Minireview: Gut microbiota: the neglected endocrine organ. Mol Endocrinol. 2014;28(8):1221–38. doi: 10.1210/me.2014-1108 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cui W, Chen SL, Hu KQ. Quantification and mechanisms of oleic acid-induced steatosis in HepG2 cells. Am J Transl Res. 2010;2(1):95–104. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2826826. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nagao K, Inoue N, Wang YM, Shirouchi B, Yanagita T. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid alleviates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Zucker (fa/fa) rats. J Nutr. 2005;135(1):9–13. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Choi JS, Koh IU, Jung MH, Song J. Effects of three different conjugated linoleic acid preparations on insulin signalling, fat oxidation and mitochondrial function in rats fed a high-fat diet. Br J Nutr. 2007;98(2):264–75. doi: 10.1017/S000711450770497X . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Clement L, Poirier H, Niot I, Bocher V, Guerre-Millo M, Krief S, et al. Dietary trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid induces hyperinsulinemia and fatty liver in the mouse. J Lipid Res. 2002;43(9):1400–9. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kelley DS, Vemuri M, Adkins Y, Gill SH, Fedor D, Mackey BE. Flaxseed oil prevents trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid-induced insulin resistance in mice. Br J Nutr. 2009;101(5):701–8. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508027451 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ferre P, Foufelle F. SREBP-1c transcription factor and lipid homeostasis: clinical perspective. Horm Res. 2007;68(2):72–82. doi: 10.1159/000100426 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abdul-Wahed A, Guilmeau S, Postic C. Sweet Sixteenth for ChREBP: Established Roles and Future Goals. Cell Metab. 2017;26(2):324–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.07.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ducheix S, Montagner A, Polizzi A, Lasserre F, Marmugi A, Bertrand-Michel J, et al. Essential fatty acids deficiency promotes lipogenic gene expression and hepatic steatosis through the liver X receptor. J Hepatol. 2013;58(5):984–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.01.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Watanabe M, Houten SM, Wang L, Moschetta A, Mangelsdorf DJ, Heyman RA, et al. Bile acids lower triglyceride levels via a pathway involving FXR, SHP, and SREBP-1c. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(10):1408–18. doi: 10.1172/JCI21025 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC406532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. mRNA expression of lipogenic genes in HepG2 cells following CLAs treatment at 100 μM.

HepG2 cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with 100 μM of linoleic acid (LA), cis-9,trans-11 (c9t11) CLA, cis-9,cis-11 (c9c11) CLA or trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA for 24 h. The mRNA expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1), acetyl-CoA carboxylase α (ACCα), fatty acid elongase 6 (Elolv6) were measured by qPCR and expressed as relative expression. Data are the means ± SEM of 7 independent experiments (n = 4 to 14). Data with no common superscript letter are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to the post-hoc ANOVA statistical analysis.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. HepG2 cell viability following CLAs treatment.

HepG2 cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with linoleic acid (LA), cis-9,trans-11 (c9t11) CLA, cis-9,cis-11 (c9c11) CLA or trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Cell viability was determined by an MTT assay and expressed as % of surviving cells compared to control cells. Data are the means ± SEM of 2 independent experiments (n = 4 to 14). * Significantly different from the BSA control condition (p ≤ 0.05) according to a Student’s t-test analysis.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. mRNA expression of lipogenic genes following CLA treatment in HepG2 cells with a knockdown for SREBP-1.

HepG2 cells were transfected with SREBP-1 siRNA. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with 10 μM of trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA during 24 h. The mRNA expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c), SREBP-1a, fatty acid synthase (FAS), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1), acetyl-CoA carboxylase α (ACCα), fatty acid elongase 6 (Elolv6) were measured by qPCR and expressed as relative expression. Data are the means ± SEM of 2 independent experiments (n = 4 to 8). * Significantly different from the scramble (RLUC) condition (p ≤ 0.05) according to a Student’s t-test statistical analysis.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. mRNA expression of Liver X Receptor (LXR) target genes in HepG2 cells following CLA treatment.

HepG2 cells were incubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or with 10 μM of linoleic acid (LA), or trans-11,trans-13 (t11t13) CLA for 24 h. The mRNA expression of phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) and CYP7A1 cytochrome P450 family 7 subfamily A member 1 (Cyp7a1) were measured by qPCR and expressed as relative expression. Data are the means ± SEM (n = 6). Data with different superscript letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to the post-hoc ANOVA statistical analysis.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Diet composition.

Formulated by Research Diets. Parenthetical numbers indicate the manufacturer's diet number.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Diet fatty acid pattern.

Fatty acid composition of CT and DEF diet expressed as % of total fatty acid of the diet. ND = not detectable.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. The primer sequences used for real-time quantitative PCR.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES