Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell. 2018 Jan 18;69(2):347. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.12.034

EGFR-Induced and PKCε Monoubiquitylation-Dependent NF-κB Activation Upregulates PKM2 Expression and Promotes Tumorigenesis

Weiwei Yang, Yan Xia, Yu Cao, Yanhua Zheng, Wen Bu, Lin Zhang, M James You, Mei Yee Koh, Gilbert Cote, Kenneth Aldape, Yi Li, Inder M Verma, Paul J Chiao, Zhimin Lu *
PMCID: PMC5794337  NIHMSID: NIHMS935122  PMID: 29351852

For Figure 7B, we used non-integral numbers to determine the intensities of the IHC staining of the patient tissues. However, our original method description does not clearly reflect the score system we used and should have been described as follows. We assigned the following proportion scores: 0 if 0% of the tumor cells showed positive staining, 0.1–1.0 if 0.1%–1% of cells were stained, 1.1–2.0 if 1.1%–10% stained, 2.1–3.0 if 11%–30% stained, 3.1–4.0 if 31%–70% stained, and 4.1–5.0 if 71%–100% stained (each percentage range of the stained tumor section is further divided into ten smaller percentage ranges and represented by corresponding non-integral scores, such as 3.1 representing 31%–34%). We rated the intensity of staining on a scale from 0 to 3: 0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong. We then combined the proportion and intensity scores to obtain a total score (range, 0–8), as described previously (Allred et al., 1998). We sincerely apologize for any confusion that may be caused by the original inaccurate description.

References

  1. Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM. Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:155–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES