Abstract
Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and canonical Wnt (cWnt) signaling factors are both known to regulate bone mass, fracture risk, fracture repair, and osteoblastogenesis. BMP3 is the most abundant BMP and negatively regulates osteoblastogenesis and bone mass. Thus, identifying the mechanism by which BMP3 acts to depress bone formation may allow for the development of new therapeutics useful in the treatment for osteopenia and osteoporosis. Here, we report that cWnt signaling stimulates BMP3 expression in osteoblast (OB) lineage cells. The expression of BMP3 increases with OB differentiation. Treatment of cells with various cWnt proteins stimulated BMP3 expression. Mice with enhanced cWnt signaling had high expression levels of BMP3. Our data suggest that reduction in BMP3 levels may contribute beneficially to the positive effect of cWnt agonists on bone mass.
Keywords: osteoblast, osteoblastogenesis, osteocyte, osteopenia, osteoporosis, regenerative medicine
Abbreviations
- ALP
alkaline phosphatase
- BIO
bromoindirubin oxime
- BMP
bone morphogenetic protein
- BMSCs
bone marrow stromal cells
- cWnts
canonical Wnts
- DKK1
dickkopf‐related protein 1
- ECR
evolutionarily conserved region
- OBs
osteoblasts
- OCYs
osteocytic cells
- qPCR
quantitative real‐time PCR
- sFRPs
secreted frizzled‐related proteins
Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture 1. In 2010, more than 10 million Americans over the age of 50 had osteoporosis with another 43 million Americans at risk for the disease 2. It is estimated that greater than 1.5 million fragility fractures occur each year, with an annual healthcare cost of at least 14 billion US dollars 3. By 2025, the healthcare expenditures for osteoporotic fractures will approach 25.3 billion US dollars 4, highlighting the need for new therapies aimed at preventing the bone loss that normally occurs with aging 5.
Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and canonical Wnt (cWnt) signaling‐related molecules are known to regulate bone mass, fracture risk, fracture repair, and osteoblastogenesis. Generalized loss of endogenous BMP activity in postnatal mice through overexpression of BMP antagonists by osteoblast (OB) lineage cells leads to osteopenia, bone fragility, and spontaneous fracture 6, 7, 8. Mice lacking BMP2 are unable to maintain adequate bone formation after birth 9, while short‐term systemic administration of BMP2 has been reported to reverse bone loss in osteopenic mice 10.
Canonical Wnts are secreted proteins that signal through Lrp and Frizzled coreceptor complexes to stabilize intracellular pools of β‐catenin and activate Tcf/Lef‐dependent gene transcription 11. A large number of studies have examined the utility of enhancing cWnt signaling as means of promoting bone regeneration. LiCl treatment, through activation of cWnt signaling, improves fracture repair in mice, as does targeted inhibition of the Wnt pathway antagonists sFRP1, DKK1, or sclerostin 12, 13, 14.
BMP3 is the most abundant BMP within bone matrix and accounts for approximately 65% of the total BMP content in demineralized bone 15, 16. It is mainly secreted by OBs and osteocytes 17. Adult mice lacking BMP3 have increased bone mass, while mice with increased BMP3 levels in bone show delayed endochondral ossification with spontaneous rib fractures 18, 19. These phenotypes fit to BMP3 function; BMP3 suppresses OB differentiation by repressing BMP‐Smad signaling via interaction with activin receptor 2b (Acvr2b) in vitro 17.
Thus, identifying the mechanism by which BMP3 acts to depress bone formation may allow for the development of new therapeutics useful in the treatment for osteopenia and osteoporosis. However, as BMP3 is not a signaling molecule but acts as a receptor antagonist, we cannot identify downstream targets of BMP3 signaling. Instead, we need to focus on regulators that are upstream of BMP3 20. Here, we report that cWnt signaling is upstream of BMP3 and stimulates BMP3 expression in OB lineage cells.
Materials and methods
Collection of osteoblast lineage cells
Primary bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were collected from femurs and tibias of 6‐week‐old wild‐type C57BL/6J mice or heterozygous BMP3 LacZ‐knock‐in reporter mice 17. Primary calvarial OBs were harvested by sequential collagenase digestion from natal wild‐type C57BL/6J mice, heterozygous BMP3 LacZ‐knock‐in reporter mice, or heterozygous DKK1‐knockout mice. Osteocytic cells (OCYs) were enriched by sequential collagenase digestion as reported previously 21, 22.
Cell culture
Bone marrow stromal cells and OBs were treated with OB differentiation medium containing 50 μg·mL−1 ascorbic acid and 10 mm β‐glycerophosphate for 0, 7, or 14 days 23. BMSCs, OBs, OCYs, or 8‐week‐old male mice femoral bones were treated with 100 ng·mL−1 recombinant human BMP2 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), several concentrations (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, or 200 ng·mL−1) of rhWnt3a (R&D Systems), 100 ng·mL−1 rhDkk1 (R&D Systems), 100 ng·mL−1 rhWnt1 (R&D Systems), 100 ng·mL−1 rhWnt5a (R&D Systems), 10 μm KCl (Sigma Aldrich Chemicals, St. Louis, MO, USA), or 10 μm LiCl (Sigma Aldrich Chemicals) for 1 day. HEK293T cells were maintained and cultured as reported previously 24.
Administration of bromoindirubin oxime BIO and analysis of femoral bones from mice
Bromoindirubin oxime (BIO; Sigma Aldrich Chemicals) or control vehicle was administered intraperitoneally into 8‐week‐old wild‐type male mice (0.75 mg·kg−1 IP 3 times over 9) 25. Mice were sacrificed at 1 day after last BIO injection. Femoral bones were collected. Animal protocols were approved by the Harvard Medical Area Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol #04043 to V.R.)
Ectopic bone formation assay
The bone formation effects induced by BMP2 in vivo were examined using an ectopic bone formation assay 26. rhBMP2 (R& D Systems) (1 μg) were blotted onto a collagen sponge disk (6 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) made from commercially available bovine collagen sheets (Helistat, Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro, NJ, USA), freeze‐dried, and maintained at −20 until being implanted into the mice. All procedures were performed under sterile conditions. The mice were anesthetized using pentobarbital (Kyoritsu Seiyaku, Tokyo, Japan), and collagen pellets were surgically implanted into dorsal muscle pouches (2 pellets/animal) of the mice (8 weeks old).
RNA isolation and quantitative real‐time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from cells using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and then reverse‐transcribed into cDNA using Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The cDNA was amplified by quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR) using primers specific for murine BMP3 (forward, tctcccaagtcatttgatgct; reverse, gcgtgatttgatggtttcaa), murine osteocalcin (OC) (forward, agactccggcgctacctt; reverse, ctcgtcacaagcagggttaag), murine SOST (forward, caggagaggaagcttgagtcc; reverse, agggtagaaagacccccatc), murine DKK1 (forward, ccgggaactactgcaaaaat; reverse, ccaaggttttcaatgatgctt), murine alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (forward, cggatcctgaccaaaaacc; reverse, tcatgatgtccgtggtcaat), and β‐actin (forward, aaggccaaccgtgaaaagat; reverse, gtggtacgaccagaggcatac). qPCR was performed in 96‐well plate using Fast Start Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche) with iCycler Multicolor Real‐Time PCR Detection system (BIO‐RAD, Richmond, CA, USA) 27. Values were normalized to β‐actin using the 2‐ΔΔC t method 28.
β‐Galactosidase activity, cell transfection, and luciferase activity
β‐Galactosidase activity was determined by the Beta‐Glo Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Luciferase assays were performed using pGL4.26‐ or pGL4.26‐containing R2 luciferase plasmid and phRL‐SV40 (Promega) with the Dual‐Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega) as previously described 17.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay
ChIP was performed with a ChIP assay kit (Cell signaling, Beverly, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions using anti‐β‐catenin rabbit polyclonal antibody (#9562; Cell Signaling) and normal rabbit IgG (MBL, Aichi, Japan). The purified DNA was analyzed by PCR using primers. The primer pairs for R1 (forward, TCA GTA TGT CTT GCT GGC GA; reverse, TTT TAT TAC CCG ACA CAG GTG), R2 (forward, TGT GAC TAT GGG TGA TGG AG; reverse, TTG CCA TTT GTT TAC TTT CTC C), or R3 (forward, GCT GCA AGG ACA TTT CAC AC; reverse, GAG AGG CTC CAA TGA GAT CA).
Western blot analysis
The following antibodies were used for western blot analysis: anti‐BMP3 mouse monoclonal antibody (C‐9, sc390046; Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti‐β‐catenin rabbit polyclonal antibody (#9562; Cell Signaling), and anti‐β‐actin mouse monoclonal antibody (Sigma Aldrich Chemicals).
In silico experiments
DNA sequences were aligned using blastn 29 version 2.2.26± or ECR Brower 30 through the respective online servers or locally using muscle in mega5 software 31. The consensus sequence upstream of Bmp3 was constructed using the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Simple Consensus Maker (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/CONSENSUS/consensus.html) using ‘Output aligned’ parameter. For the identification of transcription factor binding sites, DNA sequences were first aligned using zpicture 32.
Plasmids
Sequences corresponding to specific regions upstream of murine Bmp3‐R2 [chr5:98846288–98846834 (547 bp)] were amplified and cloned into the promoter‐firefly luciferase reporter vector pGL4.26 (Promega). Mutant Bmp3‐R2 plasmid was generated using the following specific primer: 5′‐ctaaaatgctaattttggttttttttgagtcctgtgactatgggt‐3′ (mutation underlined). All of the final constructs were confirmed by sequencing.
Statistical analysis
Comparisons were made on at least three independent experiments using an unpaired ANOVA with Tukey–Kramer post hoc test and Wilcoxon's signed rank test. The results are shown as the mean ± SD. The statistical significance is indicated as follows: **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05.
Results
The expression of BMP3 increases with osteoblast differentiation
BMP3 is highly expressed by OBs and osteocytes, but very low in BMSCs and mesenchymal stem cells residing in the periosteum, which are progenitor cells for OBs and osteocytes 17. Thus, we monitored the expression levels of BMP3 in the process of OB differentiation and maturation in vitro. BMP3 expression in BMSCs and primary calvarial OBs increased during the process of OB differentiation and subsequent maturation (Fig. 1A,D). This increased BMP3 expression correlates with the expression levels of OB marker genes including ALP, OC, and the cWnt signal inhibitors such SOST (gene coding sclerostin) and DKK1 (Fig. 1B,C,E–G). BMP3 expression also increased during BMP2‐mediated ectopic bone formation in skeletal muscle tissue (Fig. 1H–J).
cWnt signaling regulates BMP3 expression in osteoblast lineage cells
Canonical Wnts and BMPs are produced by OB lineage cells and regulate osteoblastogenesis through several complex interactions 33. When we examined the effect of BMP2 or Wnt3a on BMP3 expression, we found that Wnt3a induced the mRNA levels of BMP3 in BMSCs and OBs, in a dose‐dependent manner, in contrast to BMP2 (Fig. 2A–D). Using BMSCs or OBs obtained from BMP3‐LacZ mice as a system to measure BMP3 levels, we found that Wnt3a greatly increases BMP3 production (Fig. 2E,F). When osteocytes and bone marrow flushed from femurs, which contained a large number of OBs and osteocytes, were treated with Wnt3a (Fig. 2G,H), the expression levels of BMP3 also increased, suggesting that Wnt3a regulates BMP3 expression in OB lineage cells.
Not only cWnt but also noncanonical Wnts are important for bone metabolism 34. We next examined whether other Wnts or the factors modulating Wnt signaling affect BMP3 expression. Wnt1, another cWnt, and with LiCl, an inhibitor of GSK3β also induced BMP3 expression, while treatment with Wnt5a, an activator of noncanonical Wnt signaling, had no effect on BMP3 expression. Furthermore, treatment of OBs with Dkk1, a potent cWnt signaling inhibitor, reduced basal levels of BMP3 (Fig. 3A–C). We previously reported the region from 0 to −0.8 kbp upstream of bmp3 in mammals containing promoter by comparative genomics and functional analyses 20. By same strategy, we used ECR Browser 32 to identify regions of nucleotide conservation between Homo sapiens (humans) and Mus musculus (mouse). We focused on murine chromosome 5 from position 98802021 to position 98855113, which corresponds to the entire region between the annotated murine BMP3 transcriptional start site and the nearby 1700007G11Rik open reading frame (Fig. 3D), because, in general, the cis‐regulatory regions reside at upstream of transcriptional start of the genes 20. This revealed that seven evolutionarily conserved regions (ECRs; ≥ 77% homology between humans and mouse) were identified and R1 (located at −12 kb), R2 (−8 kb), and R3 (−1.6 kb) contain putative Tcf/Lef binding sequences (Fig. 3D). ChIP analysis demonstrated that endogenous β‐catenin binds to R2 region when the cells were treated with Wnt3a (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, the luciferase reporter‐containing R2 region responded to Wnt3a and its activity increased (Fig. 3F), suggesting that at least in part cWnts–β catenin signaling directly regulates BMP3 expression via R2 region.
Enhanced cWnt signaling has high expression levels of BMP3 in mice
We finally examined whether the BMP3 expression increased in cWnt enhancing model in vivo. The expression levels of BMP3 were found to be increased in OBs from DKK1 heterozygous‐knockout mice, resulting in enhanced cWnt signaling and increased bone mass 35 (Fig. 4A). The inhibition of GSK3β by BIO injection increased mRNA levels of BMP3 and Axin2, which is direct target gene of cWnt signaling (Fig. 4B,C). Administration of BIO also stimulated the expression levels of β‐catenin and BMP3 in femoral bone in vivo (Fig. 4D).
Discussion
In this report, we demonstrated that the BMP and cWnt signaling pathways interact at the level of BMP3. BMP signaling and cWnt signaling are essential for osteoblastogenesis, and crosstalk between both signaling is known. cWnt signaling stimulates the transactivation of BMP2 through the Tcf/Lef response elements in the BMP2 promoter 36. Activation of Wnt signaling also induces expression of BMP family members including BMP2, BMP4, and BMP7 and increases expression of BMP target genes such as Msx and gremlin in the mesenchyme 37. cWnt signaling also enhances BMPs expression in C3H10T1/2 cells 38, 39. In contrast, some in vitro studies demonstrated that BMPs induce cWnts in C2C12 cells and primary OBs 40, 41. However, BMP signaling upregulates sclerostin and DKK1 expression, leading to an inhibition of cWnt signaling and a decrease in bone mass 42, 43, 44. Thus, interpretation of crosstalk between BMPs and cWnts is sometimes controversial, and these physiological roles are still largely unknown. Our finding provides novel insights into the nature of functional crosstalk integrating the BMP and cWnt pathways in OB differentiation and skeletal homeostasis.
BMP3 is negative regulator of osteoblastogenesis and bone mass acting as acvr2b antagonist 17, 18, 45. Administration of Acvr2bFc, a second soluble type II Acvr2b decoy, also leads to an increased bone formation in adult mice 46. The importance of cWnt signaling in bone is well documented, and in general, increasing cWnt signaling correlates with enhanced bone formation through increased differentiation and maturation of OBs. More recently, neutralizing antibodies targeting antagonists of the cWnt pathway, such as SOST and DKK1, have entered clinical trials as systemic agents that enhance bone formation 11.
Taken together, the induction of BMP3 by cWnt seems to be negative feedback mechanism in the aspect of osteoblastogenesis and bone formation, suggesting that reducing BMP3 levels may provide an additional benefit to increasing bone mass using agents that enhance cWnt signaling. Needless to say, it is important to establish animal model and analysis. In conclusion, cWnt signaling upregulates BMP3 expression in OB lineage cells.
Author contributions
SK performed the experiments. SK and VR reviewed the intermediate draft. SK and VR designed the study, performed the literature review, prepared the initial and final versions of the article, and submitted the document.
Acknowledgements
We thank JW Lowery and WN Addison for insightful comments over the course of this work.
References
- 1. Edwards MH, Dennison EM, Aihie Sayer A, Fielding R and Cooper C (2015) Osteoporosis and sarcopenia in older age. Bone 80, 126–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S and Dawson‐Hughes B (2014) The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 29, 2520–2526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Blume SW and Curtis JR (2011) Medical costs of osteoporosis in the elderly Medicare population. Osteoporos Int 22, 1835–1844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Raisz LG, Elderkin AL, Schargorodski L, Hart T, Waldman C, King T and Noonan AS (2009) A call to action: developing and implementing a national action plan to improve bone health. Osteoporos Int 20, 1805–1806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kokabu S, Lowery JW and Jimi E (2016) Cell fate and differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Int 2016, 3753581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gazzerro E, Gangji V and Canalis E (1998) Bone morphogenetic proteins induce the expression of noggin, which limits their activity in cultured rat osteoblasts. J Clin Investig 102, 2106–2114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wu XB, Li Y, Schneider A, Yu W, Rajendren G, Iqbal J, Yamamoto M, Alam M, Brunet LJ, Blair HC et al (2003) Impaired osteoblastic differentiation, reduced bone formation, and severe osteoporosis in noggin‐overexpressing mice. J Clin Investig 112, 924–934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gazzerro E, Pereira RC, Jorgetti V, Olson S, Economides AN and Canalis E (2005) Skeletal overexpression of gremlin impairs bone formation and causes osteopenia. Endocrinology 146, 655–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tsuji K, Bandyopadhyay A, Harfe BD, Cox K, Kakar S, Gerstenfeld L, Einhorn T, Tabin CJ and Rosen V (2006) BMP2 activity, although dispensable for bone formation, is required for the initiation of fracture healing. Nat Genet 38, 1424–1429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Turgeman G, Zilberman Y, Zhou S, Kelly P, Moutsatsos IK, Kharode YP, Borella LE, Bex FJ, Komm BS, Bodine PV et al (2002) Systemically administered rhBMP‐2 promotes MSC activity and reverses bone and cartilage loss in osteopenic mice. J Cell Biochem 86, 461–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Baron R and Kneissel M (2013) WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments. Nat Med 19, 179–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gaur T, Wixted JJ, Hussain S, O'Connell SL, Morgan EF, Ayers DC, Komm BS, Bodine PV, Stein GS and Lian JB (2009) Secreted frizzled related protein 1 is a target to improve fracture healing. J Cell Physiol 220, 174–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Macsai CE, Foster BK and Xian CJ (2008) Roles of Wnt signalling in bone growth, remodelling, skeletal disorders and fracture repair. J Cell Physiol 215, 578–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bajada S, Marshall MJ, Wright KT, Richardson JB and Johnson WE (2009) Decreased osteogenesis, increased cell senescence and elevated Dickkopf‐1 secretion in human fracture non union stromal cells. Bone 45, 726–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rosen V (2006) BMP and BMP inhibitors in bone. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1068, 19–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bahamonde ME and Lyons KM (2001) BMP3: to be or not to be a BMP. J Bone Joint Surg 83‐A (Suppl 1), S56–S62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kokabu S, Gamer L, Cox K, Lowery J, Tsuji K, Raz R, Economides A, Katagiri T and Rosen V (2012) BMP3 suppresses osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells via interaction with Acvr2b. Mol Endocrinol 26, 87–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Daluiski A, Engstrand T, Bahamonde ME, Gamer LW, Agius E, Stevenson SL, Cox K, Rosen V and Lyons KM (2001) Bone morphogenetic protein‐3 is a negative regulator of bone density. Nat Genet 27, 84–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gamer LW, Cox K, Carlo JM and Rosen V (2009) Overexpression of BMP3 in the developing skeleton alters endochondral bone formation resulting in spontaneous rib fractures. Dev Dyn 238, 2374–2381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lowery JW, Lavigne AW, Kokabu S and Rosen V (2013) Comparative genomics identifies the mouse Bmp3 promoter and an upstream evolutionary conserved region (ECR) in mammals. PLoS One 8, e57840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Mikuni‐Takagaki Y, Suzuki Y, Kawase T and Saito S (1996) Distinct responses of different populations of bone cells to mechanical stress. Endocrinology 137, 2028–2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Nakamura H, Aoki K, Masuda W, Alles N, Nagano K, Fukushima H, Osawa K, Yasuda H, Nakamura I, Mikuni‐Takagaki Y et al (2013) Disruption of NF‐kappaB1 prevents bone loss caused by mechanical unloading. J Bone Miner Res 28, 1457–1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sato T, Abe T, Nakamoto N, Tomaru Y, Koshikiya N, Nojima J, Kokabu S, Sakata Y, Kobayashi A and Yoda T (2008) Nicotine induces cell proliferation in association with cyclin D1 up‐regulation and inhibits cell differentiation in association with p53 regulation in a murine pre‐osteoblastic cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 377, 126–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kokabu S, Lowery JW, Toyono T, Seta Y, Hitomi S, Sato T, Enoki Y, Okubo M, Fukushima Y and Yoda T (2015) Muscle regulatory factors regulate T1R3 taste receptor expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 468, 568–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Beier EE, Sheu TJ, Buckley T, Yukata K, O'Keefe R, Zuscik MJ and Puzas JE (2014) Inhibition of beta‐catenin signaling by Pb leads to incomplete fracture healing. J Orthop Res 32, 1397–1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hirata‐Tsuchiya S, Fukushima H, Katagiri T, Ohte S, Shin M, Nagano K, Aoki K, Morotomi T, Sugiyama G, Nakatomi C et al (2014) Inhibition of BMP2‐induced bone formation by the p65 subunit of NF‐kappaB via an interaction with Smad4. Mol Endocrinol 28, 1460–1470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kokabu S, Nguyen T, Ohte S, Sato T, Katagiri T, Yoda T and Rosen V (2013) TLE3, transducing‐like enhancer of split 3, suppresses osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 438, 205–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kokabu S, Sato T, Ohte S, Enoki Y, Okubo M, Hayashi N, Nojima J, Tsukamoto S, Fukushima Y, Sakata Y et al (2014) Expression of TLE3 by bone marrow stromal cells is regulated by canonical Wnt signaling. FEBS Lett 588, 614–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L and Miller W (2000) A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 7, 203–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ovcharenko I, Nobrega MA, Loots GG and Stubbs L (2004) ECR Browser: a tool for visualizing and accessing data from comparisons of multiple vertebrate genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 32, W280–W286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M and Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28, 2731–2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ovcharenko I, Loots GG, Hardison RC, Miller W and Stubbs L (2004) zPicture: dynamic alignment and visualization tool for analyzing conservation profiles. Genome Res 14, 472–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Salazar VS, Ohte S, Capelo LP, Gamer L and Rosen V (2016) Specification of osteoblast cell fate by canonical Wnt signaling requires Bmp2. Development 143, 4352–4367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Maeda K, Kobayashi Y, Udagawa N, Uehara S, Ishihara A, Mizoguchi T, Kikuchi Y, Takada I, Kato S, Kani S et al (2012) Wnt5a‐Ror2 signaling between osteoblast‐lineage cells and osteoclast precursors enhances osteoclastogenesis. Nat Med 18, 405–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Morvan F, Boulukos K, Clément‐Lacroix P, Roman Roman S, Suc‐Royer I, Vayssière B, Ammann P, Martin P, Pinho S, Pognonec P et al (2006) Deletion of a single allele of the Dkk1 gene leads to an increase in bone formation and bone mass. J Bone Miner Res 21, 934–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhang R, Oyajobi BO, Harris SE, Chen D, Tsao C, Deng HW and Zhao M (2013) Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling activates bone morphogenetic protein 2 expression in osteoblasts. Bone 52, 145–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hill TP, Taketo MM, Birchmeier W and Hartmann C (2006) Multiple roles of mesenchymal beta‐catenin during murine limb patterning. Development 133, 1219–1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bain G, Muller T, Wang X and Papkoff J (2003) Activated beta‐catenin induces osteoblast differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells and participates in BMP2 mediated signal transduction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 301, 84–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Winkler DG, Sutherland MS, Ojala E, Turcott E, Geoghegan JC, Shpektor D, Skonier JE, Yu C and Latham JA (2005) Sclerostin inhibition of Wnt‐3a‐induced C3H10T1/2 cell differentiation is indirect and mediated by bone morphogenetic proteins. J Biol Chem 280, 2498–2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Rawadi G, Vayssiere B, Dunn F, Baron R and Roman‐Roman S (2003) BMP‐2 controls alkaline phosphatase expression and osteoblast mineralization by a Wnt autocrine loop. J Bone Miner Res 18, 1842–1853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Chen Y, Whetstone HC, Youn A, Nadesan P, Chow EC, Lin AC and Alman BA (2007) Beta‐catenin signaling pathway is crucial for bone morphogenetic protein 2 to induce new bone formation. J Biol Chem 282, 526–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Kamiya N, Ye L, Kobayashi T, Lucas DJ, Mochida Y, Yamauchi M, Kronenberg HM, Feng JQ and Mishina Y (2008) Disruption of BMP signaling in osteoblasts through type IA receptor (BMPRIA) increases bone mass. J Bone Miner Res 23, 2007–2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kamiya N, Kobayashi T, Mochida Y, Yu PB, Yamauchi M, Kronenberg HM and Mishina Y (2010) Wnt inhibitors Dkk1 and Sost are downstream targets of BMP signaling through the type IA receptor (BMPRIA) in osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res 25, 200–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kamiya N, Kaartinen VM and Mishina Y (2011) Loss‐of‐function of ACVR1 in osteoblasts increases bone mass and activates canonical Wnt signaling through suppression of Wnt inhibitors SOST and DKK1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 414, 326–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gamer LW, Nove J, Levin M and Rosen V (2005) BMP‐3 is a novel inhibitor of both activin and BMP‐4 signaling in Xenopus embryos. Dev Biol 285, 156–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Koncarevic A, Cornwall‐Brady M, Pullen A, Davies M, Sako D, Liu J, Kumar R, Tomkinson K, Baker T, Umiker B et al (2010) A soluble activin receptor type IIb prevents the effects of androgen deprivation on body composition and bone health. Endocrinology 151, 4289–4300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]