Table 3.
Subjective evaluation of the quality of life after relocation
| Items/extent | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a. Relocation brings (%) | 84.71 | 10.62 | 4.67 | ||
| 1. More benefit than loss | |||||
| 2. Same benefit and loss | |||||
| 3. Less benefit than loss | |||||
| b. Difficulties and problems after relocation (%) | 60 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Pressure of loan refund | |||||
| Loss of agricultural and livestock incomes | |||||
| Decrease of farmland access | |||||
| Shortage of public services | |||||
| Fewer job opportunities | |||||
| c. Overall evaluation of the RSP | 3.41 | 15.78 | 18.98 | 49.47 | 12.37 |
| d. Overall evaluation of the quality of life in past year | 4.04 | 9.57 | 30.00 | 44.68 | 11.70 |
| e. Evaluation of adaption after resettlement | |||||
| Adaption of customs and habits | 4.48 | 4.48 | 16.84 | 48.83 | 25.37 |
| Adaption of production | 4.47 | 12.34 | 28.72 | 42.77 | 11.7 |
| The effect of relocation on family income | 10.43 | 17.02 | 24.04 | 30.85 | 17.66 |
| Satisfaction with current income | 13.4 | 18.7 | 34.26 | 26.38 | 7.23 |
| Confidence with increasing future income | 6.4 | 10.23 | 20.26 | 40.72 | 22.39 |
| Satisfaction with new house | 4.48 | 7.68 | 17.27 | 42.22 | 28.36 |
| Satisfaction with redistribution of farmland | 12.02 | 13.09 | 39.27 | 28.54 | 7.01 |
| Satisfaction with new neighborhood relationships | 0.85 | 2.77 | 15.78 | 49.47 | 31.13 |
| Evaluation of local original residents’ hospitality | 1.92 | 3.41 | 21.75 | 49.04 | 23.88 |
| Missing the old friends | 16.63 | 19.4 | 22.6 | 29.64 | 11.73 |
| Missing the old place | 25 | 18.80 | 16.67 | 26.07 | 13.46 |
1–5 in a and b indicate the corresponding choices; for the other items, it indicates the extent from low to high