In this article, we summarize the current knowledge on ocular implications of CZS and emphasize the importance of early rehabilitation to enhance visual performance in affected children.
Abstract
Vision plays an important role in the development of communication, social interaction, spatial awareness, and the motor skills needed to explore the environment. In the past 2 years, researchers have described the broad spectrum of clinical features that comprise congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). The ocular manifestations are considered 1 important pillar of this new entity. The most characteristic ophthalmic findings include chorioretinal scars and focal pigmentary changes seen in the macular region. Since these findings were first reported, other researchers have validated and extended them, leading to a more complete picture of the spectrum of ocular manifestations related to CZS. In this article, we summarize the current knowledge on the ocular implications of CZS and emphasize the importance of early rehabilitation to enhance visual performance in affected children.
Although the Zika virus (ZIKV) was first detected in Brazil 2 years ago, ongoing repercussions of the epidemic are still being felt worldwide. Considered endemic in Africa and Asia for >60 years, this Flavivirus had not been associated with birth defects before October 2015.1,2 After more microcephaly cases were reported in northeastern Brazil, researchers in several studies showed the virus’s capacity to attack neural progenitor cells, causing microcephaly.3–7
In addition to the dramatic neurologic alterations seen in these Brazilian infants, ZIKV may cause other systemic findings and malformations. Researchers in the latest review conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) concluded that the distinct features of this novel entity, named congenital Zika syndrome (CZS), include severe microcephaly with partially collapsed skull; brain abnormalities, including thin cerebral cortices and subcortical calcifications; macular scarring and focal pigmentary retinal mottling; congenital contractures, including arthrogryposis and clubfoot; marked early hypertonia and symptoms of extrapyramidal involvement; and hearing loss.8 Although Brazil was the first country to report cases of CZS, the last update from the World Health Organization stated that 29 countries and/or territories have reported microcephaly and other central nervous system (CNS) malformations that are potentially associated with ZIKV infection or suggestive of CZS.9
Ocular Findings in CZS
So far, studies have revealed that between 21.4% and 55.0% of infants with CZS present with structural ocular findings.10–13 Despite researchers in most studies showing that ZIKV damages essentially the posterior segment of the eye, including the retina, optic nerve, and retinal vessels, other publications describe additional findings, such as iris coloboma, lens subluxation, cataracts, glaucoma, and microphthalmia.10,11,14–19 Oculomotor findings have also been described in the literature, including strabismus and nystagmus, which are probably due to the important neurologic and ocular abnormalities that these children may present with.11,12
Although CZS can present with a broad spectrum of ocular findings, the most distinctive are the pigment mottling and chorioretinal atrophy that are commonly seen in the macular region.10,11,14,15 These ocular findings were first described after being identified in infants from the state of Pernambuco, which is located in northeastern Brazil, and were later supported by other publications from other states in Brazil, including Bahia, Ceará, and Rio de Janeiro.10–14 More recently, Yepez et al20 reported similar ocular manifestations in affected infants from Colombia and Venezuela, which reinforces the consistency of these findings and the importance of ocular screening in newborns with a high suspicion for CZS.
For a better understanding of these ocular abnormalities, Ventura et al21,22 have conducted other relevant studies. In 1 of them, they analyzed the main risk factors associated with the ocular findings seen in children with CZS, which revealed that infants whose mothers reported symptoms during the first trimester of pregnancy and in those who were born with more severe microcephaly have a higher chance of presenting with ocular findings.21
There is another interesting study in which Ventura et al22 analyzed the affected retinal tissue in infants with chorioretinal scars caused by ZIKV by using optical coherence tomography (OCT). This was the first study performed in infants’ eyes in which the affected layers in the retina were shown. The OCT images revealed a discontinuation of the ellipsoid zone and hyperreflectivity underlying the retinal pigment epithelium, retinal thinning, choroidal thinning, and a colobomatouslike appearance. In addition, in subsequent reports, de Oliveira Dias et al23 and Campos et al24 described similar OCT findings in infants with CZS that corroborated the initial OCT study. The importance of these 2 studies is that they indicated how severely ZIKV affects the fetal eye, causing severe and irreversible retinal and choroidal damage. These severe OCT findings made us postulate severe visual impairment in these cases. However, until recently, no researchers addressed visual impairment in infants with CZS.
In a recent study, Ventura et al25 addressed this research gap. To evaluate visual impairment in children with CZS, the study was designed by using tools to test visual acuity, visual function, and visual developmental milestones. A total of 32 infants with CZS were examined, and Ventura et al25 concluded that regardless of structural ocular manifestations, all the children with CZS presented with visual impairment. These new data are reminiscent of cortical or cerebral visual impairment (CVI), a term that is used to describe visual impairment related to brain damage and usually affects the visual processing centers and visual pathways of the brain.26,27 In general, children with CVI encompass a wide range of visual disabilities, from no light reception to normal visual acuity with cognitive visual dysfunction.27,28 In a similar manner, children with CZS are at an increased risk of presenting with visual disabilities because of the neurologic and neuroimaging findings that are usually present, including microcephaly, cerebral cortex malformation, calcifications, abnormal brain development, and severe neurologic impairment.29,30 This statement is supported by several mice-model studies that revealed that ZIKV severely attacks human neural progenitor cells, causing cell death and restricting neurodevelopment.3–7 More precisely, van den Pol et al6 identified ZIKV infection in the retinal tissue of mice as well as in the CNS visual system, which reinforces our postulate that brain damage is the main etiology of a child’s visual impairment in CZS.
Pathophysiology of Ocular Findings
No researchers had addressed the pathophysiology of the ocular findings in CZS until recently, when van den Pol et al6 and Singh et al7 conducted independent mice-model experiments addressing this matter. van den Pol et al6 focused on examining the brain, CNS visual system, and retina and identified damage caused by ZIKV throughout the entire visual system, including the retina, optic chiasm, suprachiasmatic nucleus, lateral geniculate nucleus, and/or superior colliculus. Thus, in this study, they postulated that ZIKV spreads to other parts of the brain by axonal transportation and that the glial cells are key to understanding the mechanism behind the neurologic and ocular findings.6
Interestingly, Singh et al7 conducted a different study in which they focused solely on the pathophysiology of the retinal findings identified in CZS. In their study, Singh et al7 provided evidence that the retinal pigmented epithelium is highly permissive and susceptible to ZIKV-induced cell death and concluded that the retinal lesions in CZS occur because of the virus’s capacity to break the blood-retinal barrier. Thus, the researchers in these 2 initial studies suggested that the ocular findings in CZS may be caused by different mechanisms: axonal transportation and local damage of the retinal pigmented epithelium.
In a subsequent murine-model study, Zhao et al31 showed that ZIKV affected multiple layers of the retina. However, the primary target was the Müller glial cells, which displayed decreased neurotrophic function and increased proinflammatory cytokines after infection.
To corroborate Zhao et al’s31 findings, in a most recent study, Aleman et al32 provided the first in vivo evidence in humans showing a thinning of the ganglion cell layer, which suggests an in utero depletion of this neuronal population as a consequence of ZIKV infection.
Ocular Findings in CZS With Normal Head Circumference at Birth
In the beginning, microcephaly was the birth defect that caught the attention of family members, physicians, and society. As these children began receiving comprehensive assessments, physicians noticed that microcephaly was only the tip of the iceberg, and other abnormalities could be present, including the ocular findings.2,8 However, because microcephaly was easily identified and considered the main finding in these children, for months, it persisted as a required criterion for further ZIKV investigation.
This criterion only became obsolete when investigators started reporting cases in infants with normal head circumference at birth who presented with other neurologic and ocular findings. The first 2 case patients reported by Ventura et al33 and van der Linden et al34 were both from the state of Pernambuco in Brazil. Furthermore, the first travel-related CZS case patient from the United States presented with similar clinical findings, corroborating the new idea that microcephaly is not a required criterion for CZS screening.35
Screening for Ocular Findings in Newborns
The current CDC guidelines recommend an initial clinical evaluation comprising a comprehensive physical, neurologic, hearing, and ophthalmologic examination for (1) infants born to mothers with laboratory evidence of ZIKV infection during pregnancy and (2) infants who have abnormal clinical or neuroimaging findings that are suggestive of CZS and have a maternal epidemiologic link suggesting possible transmission regardless of maternal ZIKV test results.36 Nevertheless, a recent study by Zin et al13 revealed that eye abnormalities may be the only initial finding in CZS and suggested that all infants with potential exposure to ZIKV in utero should undergo eye screening regardless of CNS abnormalities.
The ocular examination should be performed before hospital discharge or within 1 month and include anterior segment and fundus evaluation. It is important to emphasize the importance of performing a thorough fundus examination with adequate pupil dilation because retinal findings can be discrete and almost imperceptible. In addition, the CDC recommends repeating the ophthalmologic evaluation at 3 months of age for those infants with a confirmed diagnosis.36
Diagnosing ZIKV Infection
The most common symptoms reported in acquired Zika infection (AZI) are maculopapular rash, arthritis or arthralgia, and nonpurulent conjunctivitis, which are nonspecific symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose patients clinically. Moreover, these symptoms are present in only 20% of infected patients.37 Thus, physicians really need laboratory testing to confirm ZIKV infection. The tests that are available include molecular tests to identify the presence of ZIKV RNA by using polymerase chain reaction technology, serology (immunoglobulin M [IgM]), and plaque-reduction neutralization tests for equivocal cases.38
The purpose of performing a polymerase chain reaction is to detect a live virus, which confirms ZIKV infection, and no further testing is needed. Despite being the most accurate test, it can be used only during the acute viremia phase.
After the acute phase of infection, serologic tests using ZIKV-specific IgM and neutralizing antibodies are used for diagnosis. Unfortunately, the currently available IgM test can be difficult to interpret secondary to nonspecific reactivity and cross-reactivity to other Flaviviruses; therefore, a positive result must be followed up by a confirmatory plaque-reduction neutralization test.38
Treatment
Although scientists have been investing immense effort in developing an effective vaccine and antiviral agents to prevent new CZS cases, these measures are still not available and will not revert the existing cases.39–43
Children with CZS present with severe and multiple disabilities, which require constant care and a variety of therapies. The clinical and rehabilitation treatment must be personalized for each patient and address each of their necessities. The best way to assist patients with CZS is to provide multidisciplinary care involving trained physicians and therapists. As part of this team, ophthalmologists play an important role. They are part of the frontline of care and are responsible for detecting ocular lesions and initiating early intervention for visual development in infants with CZS.
The reason children with CZS need ocular and visual screening early in life is to detect potential visual impairment associated with the ocular findings and/or CVI to provide interventions during the critical period of neuroplasticity.44 This period provides a window of opportunity for neuronal activity that is responsible for vision to be routed from the damaged areas of the visual pathways and primary visual cortex to other areas of the brain that are responsible for visual function.44
The assessment of children with CZS requires a multidisciplinary team and includes a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, an assessment of visual function and visual milestones (performed by ophthalmologists), and a functional vision assessment (performed by therapists).25,44 Identifying and treating infants who present with known causes of visual impairment, including refractive errors, anisometropia, hypoaccommodation, amblyopia, and strabismus, are key. In addition, regardless of ocular findings, many of these children may need magnifying glasses, patching, visual stimulation therapy to promote visual development and potentiate their remaining vision, and (in selected cases) strabismus surgery.25
Of note, the capacity to make use of residual vision also depends on a child’s ability to neurologically process and understand environmental sensory information.45 Thus, treatment needs to be customized to maximize the child’s residual vision by considering the complex interaction of the visual process, CNS functioning, and environmental stimuli.46,47
Ocular Findings in AZI
The main difference between the ocular findings seen in AZI and those identified in CZS is the presence of active uveitis, which has been reported only in AZI. Interestingly, adults who have presented with ocular manifestations during viremia (regardless of the treatment) had complete regression and recovery of their vision after the viremia period and topical treatment with steroids, and, in some cases, hypertension drops. The main ocular findings reported in AZI include conjunctivitis, hypertensive iridocyclitis, unilateral acute maculopathy, and bilateral posterior uveitis.48–51
The first reports of acute uveitis secondary to AZI were reported by Furtado et al48 and Fontes,49 who described 2 independent cases of anterior bilateral hypertensive uveitis. Subsequently, Parke et al50 published a case of unilateral posterior uveitis that resolved within 6 weeks. However, Kodati et al51 described the most recent and intriguing case. In this case report, a male patient presented with posterior uveitis that persisted with chorioretinal scars despite his visual function resolving after the acute illness. Interestingly, this is the first report in which researchers describe chorioretinal scars in AZI.
Conclusions
A diversity of ocular findings has been described in adults related to AZI and in newborns related to the vertical transmission of the virus. Undoubtedly, CZS is a challenging disease for families, health care professionals, and public health systems mostly because of the considerable amount of uncertainties involved. Although the life expectancy of children with CZS is questionable, it is important to keep in mind that most infants who were born during the Brazilian outbreak remain alive. Thus, early assessment and intervention are our best bet to diminish the impact on these children and families and to ensure a better quality of life.
Glossary
- AZI
acquired Zika infection
- CDC
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- CNS
central nervous system
- CVI
cerebral visual impairment
- CZS
congenital Zika syndrome
- IgM
immunoglobulin M
- OCT
optical coherence tomography
- ZIKV
Zika virus
Footnotes
Drs C.V. Ventura and L.O. Ventura contributed equally to this article in writing the initial manuscript draft, reviewing and revising the manuscript, approving the final manuscript as submitted, and agreeing to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
FUNDING: Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD093572. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- 1.Pan American Health Organization; World Health Organization Epidemiological alert: neurological syndrome, congenital malformations, and ZIKV infection. Implications for public health in the Americas. 2015. Available at: www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&Itemid=270&gid=32405&lang=en. Accessed March 6, 2017
- 2.Petersen LR, Jamieson DJ, Powers AM, Honein MA. Zika virus. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1552–1563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cugola FR, Fernandes IR, Russo FB, et al. . The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature. 2016;534(7606):267–271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li C, Xu D, Ye Q, et al. . Zika virus disrupts neural progenitor development and leads to microcephaly in mice. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19(1):120–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu KY, Zuo GL, Li XF, et al. . Vertical transmission of Zika virus targeting the radial glial cells affects cortex development of offspring mice. Cell Res. 2016;26(6):645–654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.van den Pol AN, Mao G, Yang Y, Ornaghi S, Davis JN. Zika virus targeting in the developing brain. J Neurosci. 2017;37(8):2161–2175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh PK, Guest JM, Kanwar M, et al. . Zika virus infects cells lining the blood-retinal barrier and causes chorioretinal atrophy in mouse eyes. JCI Insight. 2017;2(4):e92340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, et al. . Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):288–295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.World Health Organization Situation report. Zika virus, microcephaly, Guillain-Barré syndrome. 2017. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/254507/1/zikasitrep2Feb17-eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed February 6, 2017
- 10.Ventura CV, Maia M, Bravo-Filho V, Góis AL, Belfort R Jr. Zika virus in Brazil and macular atrophy in a child with microcephaly. Lancet. 2016;387(10015):228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.de Paula Freitas B, de Oliveira Dias JR, Prazeres J, et al. . Ocular findings in infants with microcephaly associated with presumed Zika virus congenital infection in Salvador, Brazil. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(5):529–535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Verçosa I, Carneiro P, Verçosa R, et al. . The visual system in infants with microcephaly related to presumed congenital Zika syndrome. J AAPOS. 2017;21(4):300.e1–304.e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zin AA, Tsui I, Rossetto J, et al. . Screening criteria for ophthalmic manifestations of congenital Zika virus infection. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(9):847–854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ventura CV, Maia M, Ventura BV, et al. . Ophthalmological findings in infants with microcephaly and presumable intra-uterus Zika virus infection. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016;79(1):1–3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Miranda HA II, Costa MC, Frazão MA, Simão N, Franchischini S, Moshfeghi DM. Expanded spectrum of congenital ocular findings in microcephaly with presumed Zika infection. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(8):1788–1794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Paula Freitas B, Ko AI, Khouri R, et al. . Glaucoma and congenital Zika syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(3):407–408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oliveira Melo AS, Malinger G, Ximenes R, Szejnfeld PO, Alves Sampaio S, Bispo de Filippis AM. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(1):6–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Calvet G, Aguiar RS, Melo ASO, et al. . Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(6):653–660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.de Paula Freitas B, Zin A, Ko A, Maia M, Ventura C, Belfort R Jr. Anterior-segment ocular findings and microphthalmia in congenital Zika syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(12):1876–1878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yepez JB, Murati FA, Pettito M, et al. ; Johns Hopkins Zika Center . Ophthalmic manifestations of congenital Zika syndrome in Colombia and Venezuela. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(5):440–445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ventura CV, Maia M, Travassos SB, et al. . Risk factors associated with the ophthalmoscopic findings identified in infants with presumed Zika virus congenital infection. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(8):912–918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ventura CV, Ventura LO, Bravo-Filho V, et al. . Optical coherence tomography of retinal lesions in infants with congenital Zika syndrome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(12):1420–1427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Oliveira Dias JR, Ventura CV, Borba PD, et al. . Infants with congenital Zika syndrome and ocular findings from São Paulo, Brazil: spread of infection [published online ahead of print January 2, 2017]. Retin Cases Brief Rep. doi: 10.1097/ICB.0000000000000518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Campos AG, Lira RP, Arantes TE. Optical coherence tomography of macular atrophy associated with microcephaly and presumed intrauterine Zika virus infection. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016;79(6):400–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ventura LO, Ventura CV, Lawrence L, et al. . Visual impairment in children with congenital Zika syndrome. J AAPOS. 2017;21(4):295.e2–299.e2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huo R, Burden SK, Hoyt CS, Good WV. Chronic cortical visual impairment in children: aetiology, prognosis, and associated neurological deficits. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(6):670–675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jan JE, Groenveld M. Visual behaviors and adaptations associated with cortical and ocular impairment in children. J Vis Impair Blind. 1993;87(4):101–105 [Google Scholar]
- 28.Coats DK, Demmler GJ, Paysse EA, Du LT, Libby C. Ophthalmologic findings in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J AAPOS. 2000;4(2):110–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Del Campo M, Feitosa IM, Ribeiro EM, et al. ; Zika Embryopathy Task Force-Brazilian Society of Medical Genetics . The phenotypic spectrum of congenital Zika syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(4):841–857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.de Fatima Vasco Aragao M, van der Linden V, Brainer-Lima AM, et al. . Clinical features and neuroimaging (CT and MRI) findings in presumed Zika virus related congenital infection and microcephaly: retrospective case series study. BMJ. 2016;353:i1901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao Z, Yang M, Azar SR, et al. . Viral retinopathy in experimental models of Zika infection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(10):4355–4365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aleman TS, Ventura CV, Cavalcanti MM, et al. . Quantitative assessment of microstructural changes of the retina in infants with congenital Zika syndrome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(10):1069–1076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ventura CV, Maia M, Dias N, Ventura LO, Belfort R Jr. Zika: neurological and ocular findings in infant without microcephaly. Lancet. 2016;387(10037):2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van der Linden V, Pessoa A, Dobyns W, et al. . Description of 13 infants born during October 2015-January 2016 with congenital Zika virus infection without microcephaly at birth - Brazil. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(47):1343–1348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ventura CV, Fernandez MP, Gonzalez IA, et al. . First travel-associated congenital Zika syndrome in the US: ocular and neurological findings in the absence of microcephaly. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47(10):952–955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Russell K, Oliver SE, Lewis L, et al. ; Contributors . Update: interim guidance for the evaluation and management of infants with possible congenital zika virus infection - United States, August 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(33):870–878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Duffy MR, Chen TH, Hancock WT, et al. . Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2536–2543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidance for U.S. laboratories testing for Zika virus infection. Updated July 24, 2017. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/laboratories/lab-guidance.html. Accessed February 5, 2017
- 39.Sapparapu G, Fernandez E, Kose N, et al. . Neutralizing human antibodies prevent Zika virus replication and fetal disease in mice. Nature. 2016;540(7633):443–447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pascoalino BS, Courtemanche G, Cordeiro MT, Gil LH, Freitas-Junior L. Zika antiviral chemotherapy: identification of drugs and promising starting points for drug discovery from an FDA-approved library. F1000 Res. 2016;5:2523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xu M, Lee EM, Wen Z, et al. . Identification of small-molecule inhibitors of Zika virus infection and induced neural cell death via a drug repurposing screen. Nat Med. 2016;22(10):1101–1107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Abbink P, Larocca RA, De La Barrera RA, et al. . Protective efficacy of multiple vaccine platforms against Zika virus challenge in rhesus monkeys. Science. 2016;353(6304):1129–1132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Abbasi J. First inactivated Zika vaccine trial. JAMA. 2016;316(24):2588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brandão AO, Andrade GMQ, Vasconcelos GC, Rossi LDF, Saliba GR. Instruments for evaluation of functionality in children with low vision: a literature review. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2017;80(1):59–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen D, Calvello G, Friedman CT; American Printing House for the Blind . Parents and Their Infants With Visual Impairments. 2nd ed Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hyvärinen L, Walthes R, Jacob N, Lawrence L, Chaplin KN Delayed visual development: development of vision and visual delays. Available at: www.aao.org/pediatric-center-detail/delayed-visual-development-development-of-vision-v. Accessed February 20, 2017
- 47.Droste PJ, Archer SM, Helveston EM. Measurement of low vision in children and infants. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(10):1513–1518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Furtado JM, Espósito DL, Klein TM, Teixeira-Pinto T, da Fonseca BA. Uveitis associated with Zika virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):394–396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fontes BM. Zika virus-related hypertensive iridocyclitis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016;79(1):63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Parke DW III, Almeida DR, Albini TA, Ventura CV, Berrocal AM, Mittra RA. Serologically confirmed Zika-related unilateral acute maculopathy in an adult. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(11):2432–2433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kodati S, Palmore TN, Spellman FA, Cunningham D, Weistrop B, Sen HN. Bilateral posterior uveitis associated with Zika virus infection. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):125–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]