Abstract
In this study, the sensing properties of an amorphous indium gallium zinc oxide (a-IGZO) thin film at ozone concentrations from 500 to 5 ppm were investigated. The a-IGZO thin film showed very good reproducibility and stability over three test cycles. The ozone concentration of 60–70 ppb also showed a good response. The resistance change (ΔR) and sensitivity (S) were linearly dependent on the ozone concentration. The response time (T90-res), recovery time (T90-rec), and time constant (τ) showed first-order exponential decay with increasing ozone concentration. The resistance–time curve shows that the maximum resistance change rate (dRg/dt) is proportional to the ozone concentration during the adsorption. The results also show that it is better to sense rapidly and stably at a low ozone concentration using a high light intensity. The ozone concentration can be derived from the resistance change, sensitivity, response time, time constant (τ), and first derivative function of resistance. However, the time of the first derivative function of resistance is shorter than other parameters. The results show that a-IGZO thin films and the first-order differentiation method are promising candidates for use as ozone sensors for practical applications.
Keywords: IGZO, ozone sensor, reproducibility, ppb-level ozone
1. Introduction
Gas sensors are widely used in several environmental and industrial applications. Good gas sensors should possess several characteristics, including high sensitivity, fast response, low energy consumption, long-term operation capability, and low fabrication cost [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Metal oxide semiconductors (MOSs) are the most popular gas-sensing materials, because they have low fabrication costs, high sensitivities, and long-term operation capability. Thin films of MOSs such as tin oxide and zinc oxide, 2D materials, and graphene are widely used in different gas sensors to detect diverse target materials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Recently, low-melting liquid metal-based reaction environments have been used to synthesize oxide nanomaterials with low dimensionality (2D materials) [8,9]. The thin oxide layer is a suitable candidate for sensing gases such as NO2, CH4 and NH3 [10].
We previously reported that the MOS amorphous indium-gallium-zinc oxide (InGaZnO4, a-IGZO) has potential as an excellent ozone gas sensor [11,12]. IGZO is an n-type semiconductor with a wide band gap (3.2–3.5 eV). It has extremely high transmittance in the visible range and large electron mobility. IGZO is used in the display industry, for example, in 4K-resolution low-power IGZO LCD panels [13,14,15,16]. It is also used in gas sensors for different targets [17,18,19].
In this study, the relation between different parameters and ozone concentration was established. The stability and reproducibility of the films exposed to ozone is reported. The changes in IGZO film sensitivity, response time, time constant, and the rate of resistance change relative to the ozone concentration in the range of 500 ppb–2 ppm were evaluated. Fast, stable methods for sensing ozone are also discussed.
2. Experimental
n-type transparent IGZO thin films (thickness = 60–70 nm) were deposited onto a 10 × 10 mm2 glass substrate using an RF sputtering system. The IGZO ceramic target had an atomic ratio of In: Ga:Zn = 1:1:1. The films were deposited at room temperature and annealed at 100 °C for 1 h. The deposition pressure of pure Ar gas was 200 mTorr. The RF power was 100 W. The crystallinity and morphology of the films were studied via XRD analysis; the results showed that the films were amorphous. The figure is shown in our previous reports [11,12].
A home-made test chamber was built to house both the a-IGZO films and UV LED. The thin films were continuously irradiated using a 365-nm UV LED (P5-40-B, SemiLEDs), and the electrical properties were measured at room temperature (25 °C, RH = ~30%). The IGZO thin films were continuously irradiated using a 365-nm UV LED at room temperature. A UV LED was used as the source of excited electrons. The intensity of the UV LED was fixed at 13.92 mW/cm2. Ozone was generated from an ozone generator and passed through a low-flow metering valve. Then, the ozone was mixed with dry air obtained from an air pump before channeling into the test chamber. Ozone was initially sensed by the IGZO sensor. The ozone concentration inside the chamber was also monitored using a commercial ozone monitor (2B Tech., Model-106L). The ozone concentrations reported in this study were measured using the commercial ozone monitor. The details of the experimental schematics and processes have been reported in our previous study [11,12,20,21].
3. Results and Discussion
The quality of the films analyzed via XRD, AFM, and UV-visible spectroscopy has been reported in previous studies [11,12].
Figure 1 shows the resistance-time (R-T) curves of an IGZO film exposed to ozone concentrations from 500 to 5 ppm with a light intensity of 13.92 mW/cm2. To clearly observe the R-T curves, the time axis was shifted for the samples with 0.5–4-ppm exposure [4,22,23,24,25,26,27].
The lowest resistance (Ra in air) and saturation resistance (Rg in gas) of the film are almost identical over the course of three exposure cycles at the same ozone concentration. The excellent reproducibility of the R-T curves shows that the IGZO films have good performance as ozone gas sensors. The resistances were stabilized at different ozone concentrations.
When the measurements were performed under atmospheric conditions, the response equations can be expressed as follows:
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
The ozone molecules were adsorbed on the surface when they were channeled. The electrons were trapped by ozone, increasing the resistance. Rg is dependent on ozone concentration.
Figure 2 shows the relation between ozone concentration and both resistance change (ΔR = Rg − Ra) and sensitivity (S = (Rg − Ra)/Ra = ΔR/Ra). Both ΔR and S linearly increase with increasing ozone concentration. The magnitude of ΔR clearly differs at different ozone concentrations. The values of ΔR were 17 MΩ and 175 MΩ at ~0.5 ppm and ~5 ppm, respectively, while S increased from 1.4 to 14 across the same concentration range. Both the results indicate an order of magnitude increase in the measured parameter. The ΔR values had less variation at a given ozone concentration. These results indicate that when the ozone concentration increases, more ozone molecules are adsorbed onto the surface of the film [3,4]. According to the plot, the limit of detection is approximately 80 ppb [28]. The inset of Figure 1 shows the R-T plot of another sample at a concentration of 60–70 ppb; the IGZO thin film has potential for sensing ozone below 100 ppb. The ozone concentrations of 60–70 ppb were measured using the commercial ozone monitor. This sensing range of ozone concentration is good for practical applications (Ozone concentration over 100 ppb is harmful to health).
Figure 3 shows the response (T90-res) and recovery (T90-rec) times of the gas sensor at several ozone concentrations calculated from the results shown in Figure 1. T90-res is defined as the time required to reach 90% of ΔR, whereas T90-rec is the time required for resistance to recover 90% of ΔR. For a low ozone concentration of 0.5 ppm, T90-res was between 690 and 775 s, and T90-rec was between 1885 and 2470 s. At higher concentrations of 3-, 4- and 5-ppm ozone, the T90-res values were approximately 270, 230 and 210 s, respectively, and the T90-rec values were between 360 and 530 s [25]. Both the response and recovery times show a first-order exponential decay with increasing ozone concentration in contrast to the linear relation between the ΔR and ozone concentrations. For the same treatment, T90-res was always shorter than T90-rec. It was also found that T90-res and T90-rec determined at low concentrations have a larger variance than those determined at high concentrations; however, Ra, Rg and ΔR are almost identical, possibly because of an unstable ozone flow at low concentrations. In this study, the samples were exposed to the same light intensity under continuous irradiation. The absorption and desorption processes are in dynamic equilibrium. The desorption particles are almost the same at both low and high gas concentrations at the same light intensity. The total resistance increases when Rad-Ozone (adsorption resistance) exceeds Rde-Ozone (desorption resistance). The Rde-Ozone is far less than Rad-Ozone at the high concentration. Therefore, the response and recovery times might have decreased as the gas concentration increased.
The R-T relation can be fitted using the equation, where A and B are constant, t is the time taken for ozone channeling (s), and τ is the time constant of absorption. The behavior of ozone that adsorbs onto an IGZO film is probably similar to the charging of a capacitor. Figure 4 shows a plot of τ as a function of ozone concentration. The results show that the τ value decreased as the ozone concentration increased. Similar to the T90-res and T90-rec values, the range of τ values recorded at a low ozone concentration (τ = 324 ± 25 s at 0.5 ppm) is much wider than that recorded at a high ozone concentration (5 ppm), where τ is ~90 ± 5 s. No significant change in gas response was observed in the range 3–5 ppm; however, at low gas concentrations, large variances were observed in the sensing properties of the film.
Based on the above results, the corresponding resistance at the surface of IGZO as a function of time during the adsorption and desorption of an oxidizing gas can be described via the following equations:
(4) |
(5) |
where R(t) is the resistances after the gas exposure; R0 is a constant; ΔR is the difference between the initial and saturated resistance (Rg − Ra); t is the time taken for ozone channeling (s); and τabs and τdes are the adsorption and desorption time constants (s), respectively.
Differentiating Equations (1)–(4), respectively, are obtained as follows:
(6) |
(7) |
According to Equation (3), the maximum rate of change is ΔR/τabs during absorption.
(8) |
where a, b and k are constants. Because the C is in the ppb or ppm level, the value of kC is much less than 1. The maximum value of dRg(t)/dt is directly proportional to and dependent on the ozone concentration during the absorption. The maximum rate of change is −ΔR/τdes during the desorption. In addition, dRg(t)/dt is negative and negatively associated with ozone concentration.
Figure 5a shows the resistance change rate (dRg(t)/dt)-time relation. The rate of change in resistance is dependent on the ozone concentration [21]. At higher gas concentrations, more ozone molecules were adsorbed on the film, and the film lost electrons rapidly. Therefore, a high ozone concentration increases the amount of resistance change.
Figure 5b shows the maximum value of the first derivative of the R-T curves shown in Figure 1. The correlation between the maximum value of the resistance change rate and ozone concentration is linear and highly positive, indicating that the rate of resistance change is large at high ozone concentrations. The maximum dRg(t)/dt linearly increased with increasing ozone concentration. The results agree with Equation (8). At high ozone concentrations (2–5 ppm), the maximum values of dRg(t)/dt change significantly (between 0.36 and 1.5 MΩ/s). In the low concentration range (0.5–1 ppm), the maximum values of d Rg(t)/dt were between 45 and 90 KΩ/s; this difference is of considerable size, and can be easily distinguished. Our resistance meter can detect several ohms; therefore, it is able to sense levels of ozone of several ppb.
Figure 6 shows the R-T curves of a 13-nm-thick IGZO sensor under different light intensities at 500-ppb ozone. The sample was irradiated for three test cycles with light intensities in the range 18.9–149.7 mW/cm2. The Ra, Rg and ΔR values were different for different light intensities at the same ozone concentration. At a low-intensity light of 18.9 mW/cm2, ΔR was ~200 MΩ, and T90-res was ~475 s. At a higher light intensity of 149.7 mW/cm2, ΔR was ~30 MΩ, and T90-res was ~110 s. Ra, Rg and ΔR had slight variances across the three test cycles. The samples provided highly reproducible results at all the investigated light intensities, even though the sensors provided slightly more reproducible results under high-intensity light than under low-intensity light.
This is probably because the dynamic equilibrium (i.e., the adsorption and desorption of gas molecules from the IGZO sensor) is rapid and stable under high-intensity light. Figure 7 shows the relation between sensor sensitivity and light intensity. The sensitivity was obtained from Figure 6. The variance in sensitivity at low intensity was larger than that at high intensity, at a low ozone concentration of 500 ppb.
4. Conclusions
An IGZO ozone sensor successfully detected ozone concentrations ranging from 500 to 5 ppm. The results show good consistency for the recorded values of Ra, Rg and ΔR. Both ΔR and S exhibited a linear dependence on ozone concentration. T90-res, T90-rec and τ showed first-order exponential decay with increasing ozone concentration. The rate of resistance change linearly increased with increasing ozone concentration. The maximum value of the first derivative of the resistance curve was also dependent on the ozone concentration. The results show that dRg/dt, T90-res, T90-rec and τ can be used to determine the ozone concentration. For a given ozone concentration, the time of the first derivative function of resistance is shorter than other parameters, including T90-res, T90-rec and τ. In the low-concentration range (0.5 ppm), the maximum values of dRg/dt were between ~45 KΩ/s; this difference is considerable. Therefore, this method can be used to sense ozone at several ppb levels.
The value of ΔR recorded under low-intensity light was larger than that recorded under high-intensity light; however, compared with low-intensity light, the time required to reach a stable level of ozone absorption onto the IGZO sensor was reduced in high-intensity light. The variance in sensor sensitivity was higher under low-intensity light than that under high-intensity light. It is better to sense a low ozone concentration using a high-intensity light. Thus, IGZO is a promising candidate for use as an ozone sensor.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 106-2112-M-005-003).
Author Contributions
Chiu-Hsiien Wu conceived and designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript; Guo-Jhen Jiang, Kai-Wei Chang, Zu-Yin Deng, and Yu Ning Li performed the experiments; Kuen-Lin Chen and Chien-Chung Jeng analyzed and discussed the data.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Aswal D.K., Gupta S.K. Science and Technology of Chemiresistor Gas Sensors. Nova Publishers; Hauppauge, NY, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baraton M.-I. Sensors for Environment, Health and Security: Advanced Materials and Technologies. Springer Science & Business Media; Berlin, Germany: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Korotcenkov G. Handbook of Gas Sensor Materials. Springer; Berlin, Germany: 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Korotcenkov G., Brinzari V., Cho B.K. In2O3- and SnO2-Based Thin Film Ozone Sensors: Fundamentals. J. Sens. 2016;38:16094. doi: 10.1155/2016/3816094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu X., Cheng S., Liu H., Hu S., Zhang D., Ning H. A Survey on Gas Sensing Technology. Sensors. 2012;12:9635–9665. doi: 10.3390/s120709635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wetchakun K., Samerjai T., Tamaekong N., Liewhiran C., Siriwong C., Kruefu V., Wisitsoraat A., Tuantranont A., Phanichphant S. Semiconducting metal oxides as sensors for environmentally hazardous gases. Sens. Actuators B. 2011;160:580–591. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.08.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Galatsis K., Li Y.X., Wlodarski W., Comini E., Sberveglieri G., Cantalini C., Santucci S., Passacantando M. Comparison of single and binary oxide MoO3, TiO2 and WO3 sol-gel gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B. 2002;83:276–280. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)01072-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zavabeti A., Ou J.Z., Carey B.J., Syed N., Orrell-Trigg R., Mayes E.L.H., Xu C., Kavehei O., O’Mullane A.P., Kaner R.B., et al. A liquid metal reaction environment for the room-temperature synthesis of atomically thin metal oxides. Science. 2017;358:332–335. doi: 10.1126/science.aao4249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Carey B.J., Ou J.Z., Clark R.M., Berean K.J., Zavabeti A., Chesman A.S., Russo S.P., Lau D.W.M., Xu Z.-Q., Bao Q., et al. Wafer-scale two-dimensional semiconductors from printed oxide skin of liquid metals. Nat. Commun. 2018;8:14482. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang Q., Yu Y., Liu J. Preparations, Characteristics and Applications of the Functional Liquid Metal Materials. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2017:1700781. doi: 10.1002/adem.201700781. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu C.H., Jiang G.J., Chang K.W., Lin C.W., Chen K.L. Highly sensitive amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O films for ppb-level ozone sensing: Effects of deposition temperature. Sens. Actuators B. 2015;211:354–358. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.01.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen K.L., Jiang G.J., Chang K.W., Chen J.H., Wu C.H. Gas sensing properties of indium-gallium-zinc-oxide gas sensors in different light intensity. Anal. Chem. Res. 2015;4:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ancr.2015.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Somiya S. Handbook of Advanced Ceramics: Materials, Applications, Processing, and Properties. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yagi N., Egami N., Shimidzu N., Haseyama M. A Review of Broadcasting Technology. ITE Trans. MTA. 2013;1:10–19. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jeong H., Kong C.S., Chang S.W., Park K.S., Lee S.G., Ha Y.M., Jang J. Temperature Sensor Made of Amorphous Indium-Gallium-Zinc Oxide TFTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013;34:1569–1571. doi: 10.1109/LED.2013.2286824. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Du X., Li Y., Motley J.R., Stickle W.F., Herman G.S. Glucose Sensing Using Functionalized Amorphous In−Ga−Zn−O Field-Effect Transistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:7631–7637. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yang D.J., Whitfield G.C., Cho N.G., Choa P.-S., Kim I.D., Saltsburg H.M., Tuller H.L. Amorphous InGaZnO4 films: Gas sensor response and stability. Sens. Actuators B. 2012;171:1166–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kang D., Lim H., Kim C., Song I., Park J. Amorphous gallium indium zinc oxide thin film transistors: Sensitive to oxygen molecules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007;90:192101. doi: 10.1063/1.2723543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zan H.-W., Li C.-H., Yeh C.-C., Dai M.-Z., Meng H.-F., Tsai C.-C. Room-temperature-operated sensitive hybrid gas sensor based on amorphous indium gallium zinc oxide thin-film transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011;98:253503. doi: 10.1063/1.3601488. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jeng C.-C., Chong P.J.H., Chiu C.-C., Jiang G.-J., Lin H.-J., Wu R.-J., Wu C.-H. A dynamic equilibrium method for the SnO2-based ozone sensors using UV-LED continuous irradiation. Sens. Actuators B. 2014;195:702–706. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.01.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wu C.-H., Jiang G.-J., Chiu C.-C., Chong P., Jeng C.-C., Wu R.-J., Chen J.-H. Fast gas concentration sensing by analyzing the rate of resistance change. Sens. Actuators B. 2015;209:906–910. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.12.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carotta M.C., Cervi A., Fioravanti A., Gherardi S., Giberti A., Vendemiati B., Vincenzi D., Sacerdoti M. A novel ozone detection at room temperature through UV-LED-assisted ZnO thick film sensors. Thin Solid Films. 2011;520:939–946. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.04.173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wu R.-J., Chen C.-Y., Chen M.-H., Sun Y.-L. Photoreduction measurement of ozone using Pt/TiO2-SnO2 material at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007;123:1077–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.11.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mills S., Lim M., Lee B., Misra V. Atomic layer deposition of SnO2 for selective room temperature low ppb level O3 sensing. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2015;4:S3059–S3061. doi: 10.1149/2.0111510jss. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.David M., Ibrahim M.H., Idrus S.M., Azmi A.I., Ngajikin N.H., Marcus T.C.E., Yaacob M., Salim M.R., Aziz A.A. Progress in Ozone Sensors Performance: A Review. J. Teknol. 2015;73:23–29. doi: 10.11113/jt.v73.4402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Katsarakis N., Bender M., Cimalla V., Gagaoudakis E. Ozone sensing properties of DC-sputtered, c-axis oriented ZnO films at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2003;96:76–81. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00488-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Korostynska O., Arshak K., Hickey G., Forde E. Ozone and gamma radiation sensing properties of In2O3: ZnO:SnO2 thin films. Microsyst. Technol. 2008;14:557–566. doi: 10.1007/s00542-007-0477-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li M., Zhang W., Shao G., Kan H., Song Z., Xu S., Yu H., Jiang S., Luo J., Liu H. Sensitive NO2 gas sensors employing spray-coated colloidal quantum dots. Thin Solid Films. 2016;618:271–276. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.08.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]