Skip to main content
Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base logoLink to Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base
. 2018 Jan 24;79(1):91–114. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1625984

Pediatric Pituitary Adenoma: Case Series, Review of the Literature, and a Skull Base Treatment Paradigm

Avital Perry 1, Christopher Salvatore Graffeo 1, Christopher Marcellino 1, Bruce E Pollock 1, Nicholas M Wetjen 1, Fredric B Meyer 1,
PMCID: PMC5796823  PMID: 29404245

Abstract

Background  Pediatric pituitary adenoma is a rare skull base neoplasm, accounting for 3% of all intracranial neoplasms in children and 5% of pituitary adenomas. Compared with pituitary tumors in adults, secreting tumors predominate and longer disease trajectories are expected due to the patient age resulting in a natural history and treatment paradigm that is complex and controversial.

Objectives  The aims of this study were to describe a large, single-institution series of pediatric pituitary adenomas with extensive long-term follow-up and to conduct a systematic review examining outcomes after pituitary adenoma surgery in the pediatric population.

Methods  The study cohort was compiled by searching institutional pathology and operative reports using diagnosis and site codes for pituitary and sellar pathology, from 1956 to 2016. Systematic review of the English language literature since 1970 was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar.

Results  Thirty-nine surgically managed pediatric pituitary adenomas were identified, including 15 prolactinomas, 14 corticotrophs, 7 somatotrophs, and 4 non-secreting adenomas. All patients underwent transsphenoidal resection (TSR) as the initial surgical treatment. Surgical cure was achieved in 18 (46%); 21 experienced recurrent/persistent disease, with secondary treatments including repeat surgery in 10, radiation in 14, adjuvant pharmacotherapy in 11, and bilateral adrenalectomy in 3. At the last follow-up (median 87 months, range 3–581), nine remained with recurrent/persistent disease (23%).

Thirty-seven publications reporting surgical series of pediatric pituitary adenomas were included, containing 1,284 patients. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting tumors were most prevalent (43%), followed by prolactin (PRL)-secreting (37%), growth hormone (GH)-secreting (12%), and nonsecreting (7%). Surgical cure was reported in 65%. Complications included pituitary insufficiency (23%), permanent visual dysfunction (6%), chronic diabetes insipidus (DI) (3%), and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (4%). Mean follow-up was 63 months (range 0–240), with recurrent/persistent disease reported in 18% at the time of last follow-up.

Conclusion  Pediatric pituitary adenomas are diverse and challenging tumors with complexities far beyond those encountered in the management of routine adult pituitary disease, including nuanced decision-making, a technically demanding operative environment, high propensity for recurrence, and the potentially serious consequences of hypopituitarism with respect to fertility and growth potential in a pediatric population. Optimal treatment requires a high degree of individualization, and patients are most likely to benefit from consolidated, multidisciplinary care in highly experienced centers.

Keywords: pediatric pituitary adenoma, transsphenoidal surgery, radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, hypopituitarism

Introduction

Pediatric pituitary adenoma is a rare disease, representing 3% of all intracranial neoplasms in children, and ∼5% of all pituitary adenomas. 1 2 3 4 5 As compared with the adult disease, pituitary adenoma in children is predominantly comprised of secreting tumors, with prolactin (PRL), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and growth hormone (GH) secreting tumors observed most frequently. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 This contrast is most likely attributable to the slow progression of non-secreting tumors, which theoretically may not grow sufficiently in early life to induce symptoms. A combination of advances in our understanding of the underlying disease; on-going developments in radiation and endoscopic technology, and techniques; and shifting attitudes regarding the goals-of-care have cumulatively resulted in a highly nuanced clinical landscape.

Due to the combined rarity and complexity of the disease, pediatric pituitary adenoma has been infrequently studied, and recommendations regarding its optimal management are disparate, debated, and based on relatively poor evidence. Correspondingly, our objective was to report our own experience with these challenging tumors, systematically review the preceding literature, and assemble our findings into a treatment algorithm salient to the clinical practice of pediatric skull base surgery.

Methods

Patient Search, Inclusion Criteria, and Clinical Endpoints

The study cohort was compiled by searching institutional pathology and operative reports using diagnosis and site codes for pituitary and sellar pathology, from 1956 to 2016; positive results in patients aged 25 years and younger at time of treatment were cross-referenced with operative reports and surgical databases to confirm that patients underwent neurosurgical treatment at our institution for pituitary adenoma. Patients over 18 years at the time of diagnosis were excluded. Included patients underwent retrospective chart review to capture relevant clinical outcomes ( Tables 1 2 3 ). Given the complexities of pituitary adenoma care and the challenges of definitively identifying periods of true disease remission, in our series and review of the literature, we grouped all failures of primary surgical therapy as a single entity we refer to as recurrent or persistent disease, which we defined as any symptomatic, biochemical, or radiographic evidence of disease at any time following the first operation. Among patients who were identified as having recurrent or persistent disease, we documented disease cure only where explicit evidence confirmed that a patient was symptom-free, off tumor-suppressive pharmacotherapy, and with resolution of any previously documented biochemical and/or radiographic disease.

Table 1. Overview of the study cohort.

n  = 39
Age at time of diagnosis (years) 15 (8–18)
Age at time of first operation (years) 16 (9–22)
General neurologic symptoms or focal deficits
 Headache 26 (67%)
 Visual disturbance 14 (36%)
 Cranial neuropathy 5 (13%)
 Depression 5 (13%)
 Seizure 2 (5%)
 Diplopia 1 (3%)
 Stroke 1 (3%)
 Vertigo 1 (3%)
Nonspecific symptoms of pituitary dysfunction
 Arrested growth 6 (15%)
 Hypothyroidism 6 (15%)
 Apoplexy 4 (10%)
 Pubertal delay 3 (8%)
 Polyuria 1 (3%)
Symptoms suggesting hyperprolactinemia
 Amenorrhea a 11 (28%)
 Galactorrhea 7 (18%)
Symptoms suggesting hypercortisolemia
 Obesity/weight gain 16 (41%)
 Acne 12 (31%)
 Hirsutism 11 (28%)
 Moon facies 10 (26%)
 Striae 6 (15%)
 Buffalo hump 5 (13%)
 Easy bruising 5 (13%)
 Muscle weakness 4 (10%)
 Acanthosis nigricans 2 (5%)
 Pathologic fracture 1 (3%)
Symptoms suggesting hypersomatotropinemia
 Precocious growth 5 (13%)
 Acromegaly/gigantism 4 (10%)
Maximum tumor diameter on preoperative imaging (mm; median (range)) 11 (1–40)
Biochemical and pathologic diagnosis
 Prolactin secreting 15 (39%)
 ACTH secreting 14 (36%)
 GH secreting 7 (18%)
 Non-secreting 6 (15%)
 Pluri-hormonal 4 (10%)
 Atypical features 5 (13%)
 Crooke's hyaline change 4 (10%) b
Underlying genetic conditions
 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 1 (3%)
 McCune–Albright syndrome 1 (3%)

Abbreviations: ACTH; adrenocorticotropic hormone; GH, growth hormone.

a

Percentage of female patients only.

b

Percentage of ACTH-secreting adenomas.

Table 2. Surgical management and outcomes.

n  = 39
History of preoperative pharmacotherapy 13 (33%)
Microscopic TSR 37 (95%)
Endoscopic endonasal TSR 2 (5%)
Gross total resection 18 (46%)
Disease cured with TSR alone 18 (46%)
Recurrent/persistent disease after initial TSR 21 (54%)
 Any repeat operation 10 (26%)
 Any postoperative radiation 14 (36%)
 Any postoperative pharmacotherapy 11 (28%)
 Bilateral adrenalectomy 3 (21%) a
Treatment complications
 Chronic postoperative pituitary insufficiency 26 (67%)
 Postoperative CSF leak 3 (8%)
 Permanent postoperative visual dysfunction 1 (3%)
 Chronic diabetes insipidus 1 (3%)
 Radiation necrosis 1 (3%)
 Radiation-induced optic neuropathy 1 (3%)
 Radiation-induced abducens palsy 1 (3%)
 Meningitis 1 (3%)
Total clinical follow-up (mo.; median (range)) 87 (3–581)
Recurrent/persistent disease at last follow-up 9 (23%)
Mortalities 0 (0%)

Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; TSR, transsphenoidal resection.

a

Percentage of ACTH-secreting adenomas.

Table 3. Detailed treatment courses in recurrent or persistent disease.

n  = 21 a
Successfully treated recurrent/persistent tumors (after failed primary TSR) 12 (57%)
 Repeat TSR alone, cured at last follow-up 3 (14%)
 SRS alone (one patient underwent two treatments), cured at last follow-up b 4 (19%)
 Repeat TSR followed by SRS, cured at last follow-up 3 (14%)
 Repeat TSR followed by PBRT, cured at last follow-up 1 (5%)
 Repeat TSR, BAX, and EBRT, cured at last follow-up 1 (5%)
Unsuccessfully treated recurrent/persistent tumors (after failed primary TSR) 9 (43%)
 Pharmacotherapy alone, persistent disease at last follow-up 4 (19%)
 EBRT alone, persistent disease at last follow-up b 1 (5%)
 SRS alone, persistent disease at last follow-up b 1 (5%)
 Repeat TSR, BAX, and SRS, persistent disease at last follow-up 1 (5%)
 EBRT, multiple TSRs, and craniotomy, persistent disease at last follow-up b 1 (5%)
 Multiple TSRs and craniotomies; BAX; multiple SRS and EBRT treatments; persistent disease at last follow-up 1 (5%)

Abbreviations: BAX, bilateral adrenalectomy; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; PBRT, proton beam radiotherapy; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery; TSR, transsphenoidal resection.

a

Percentages of patients with recurrent/persistent disease after first TSR.

b

Patients with atypical features on pathology ( n  = 5).

Systematic Review

A search of the English language literature since 1970 was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Keywords and MeSH terms included “pituitar*” or “hypophys*” in combination with “child*,” “pediatr*,” “paediatr*,” or “adolesc*” and “adenoma” ( Fig. 1 ). Initial results after deduplication yielded 57 unique English language publications; bibliographies were screened for additional references potentially warranting inclusion, and all abstracts were independently reviewed by two authors to confirm that inclusion criteria were met (defined as case series of biochemically, radiographically, or pathologically confirmed pituitary adenoma reporting extractable treatment and outcomes data); instances of disagreement were secondarily re-reviewed and discussed for final adjudication. Thirty-seven eligible publications were identified, 11 of which reported patients treated up to 20 years-of-age , rather than diagnosed up to 18 years-of-age , which were deemed a comparable population and included to maximize yield. All 37 publications were reviewed in detail; relevant clinical outcomes were again captured ( Tables 4 5 ).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic depicting search strategy for systematic literature review

Table 4. Systematic review of surgical series of pediatric pituitary adenoma: clinical presentation and initial surgical management.

First author Year n Age range (y) Non-secreting ACTH secreting PRL secreting GH secreting Plurihormonal Prior RT failed Prior Rx failed Primary TSR Primary TCR GTR Disease cured with surgery alone
Richmond 1978 25 5–17 4 (16%) 8 (32%) 4 (16%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 23 (92%) 2 (8%) 17 (68%) 2 (23%)
Fraioli 1983 9 11–15 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 4 (22%) 4 (22%) 2 (22%) 0 (0%) 2 (22%) 9 (100%) 3 (33%) 2 (22%) 13 (89%)
Styne 1984 15 7–13 0 (0%) 15 (100%) 2 (13%) 0 (0%) 5 (33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%) 0 (0%) 13 (87%)
Fahlbusch 1986 14 <18 9 (64%)
Laws 1987 76 7–19 1 (1%) 22 (29%) 43 (57%) 9 (12%) 0 (0%) 76 (100%) 0 (0%) 76 (100%)
Ludecke 1987 26 1–18 0 (0%) 11 (42%) 8 (31%) 7 (23) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (15%) 26 (100%) 0 (0%) 19 (73%)
Maira 1990 52 7–20 19 (37%) 3 (6%) 22 (42%) 8 (15%) 0 (0%) 51 (98%) 1 (2%) 47 (90%)
Haddad 1991 16 7–17 0 (0%) 5 (31%) 13 (81%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (56%) 16 (100%) 0 (0%) 7 (44%)
Dyer 1994 66 <16 4 (6%) 36 (55%) 18 (27%) 8 (12%) 0 (0%) 66 (100%) 0 (0%) 56 (85%)
Kane 1994 56 7–18 0 (0%) 3 (5%) 56 (100%) 0 (0%) 19 (34%)
Magiakou 1994 50 4–20 0 (0%) 50 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 49 (98%) 0 (0%) 47 (94%)
Partington 1994 36 7–17 2 (6%) 16 (44%) 15 (42%) 3 (8%) 9 (25%) 0 (0%) 36 (100%) 0 (0%) 32 (89%) 21 (58%)
Leinung 1995 22 <19 0 (0%) 22 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 22 (100%) 0 (0%) 10 (45%)
Mindermann 1995 136 0–19 4 (3%) 48 (35%) 72 (53%) 12 (9%) 17 (29%) 2 (1%) 11 (8%) 136 (100%) 0 (0%)
Weber 1995 9 7–17 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (100%) 0 (0%) 6 (67%)
Devoe 1997 35 6–18 0 (0%) 35 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 35 (100%) 0 (0%) 27 (77%)
Massoud 1997 21 8–17 2 (10%) 14 (67%) 1 (5%) 2 (10%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 21 (100%) 0 (0%) 16 76%)
Abe 1998 5 12–18 5 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 4 (80%)
Artese 1998 47 14–20 2 (4%) 3 (6%) 34 (72%) 9 (17%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 16 (34%) 43 (91%) 5 (9%) 40 (85%)
Dissaneevate 1998 4 14–16 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 4 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Abe 1999 15 0–19 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%) 0 (0%) 9 (60%) 7 (47%)
Kunwar 1999 150 0–19 4 (3%) 54 (36%) 78 (52%) 12 (8%) 0 (0%) 150 (100%) 0 (0%)
Fideleff 2000 15 <19 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (80%) 7 (47%)
Tamura 2000 32 9–18 5 (16%) 6 (19%) 12 (38%) 4 (13%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 30 (94%) 2 (6%) 25 (78%)
Nishio 2001 5 10–17 3 (60%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%) 3 (60%) 3 (60%)
Abe 2002 14 14–17 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 14 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (86%) 14 (100%) 0 (0%) 10 (71%) 6 (43%)
Cannavo 2003 27 10–17 8 (30%) 2 (7%) 14 (52%) 3 (11%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 11 (41%) 20 (74%) 7 (26%) 8 (30%)
Storr 2003 18 6–17 0 (0%) 18 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 18 (100%) 0 (0%) 11 (61%)
Kanter 2005 33 5–19 0 (0%) 33 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 33 (100%) 0 (0%) 22 (67%)
Das 2007 10 12–17 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9 (90%) 1 (10%) 4 (40%)
Mehrazin 2007 21 1–18 2 (10%) 8 (38%) 7 (33%) 4 (19%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 13 (62%) 8 (38%) 9 (43%)
Webb 2008 20 5–18 1 (5%) 5 (25%) 5 (25%) 11 (55%) 2 (10%) 20 (100%) 0 (0%) 12 (60%) 11 (55%)
Locatelli 2010 12 13 a 3 (25%) 6 (50%) 3 (25%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%) 0 (0%) 12 (100%) 11 (92%)
Oliveira 2010 15 6–18 0 (0%) 15 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 (100%) 0 (0%) 13 (87%) 8 (53%)
Tarapore 2011 34 9–18 2 (6%) 10 (29%) 21 (62%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (29%) 34 (100%) 0 (0%) 26 (76%) 28 (82%)
Shah 2011 48 9–19 0 (0%) 48 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 48 (100%) 0 (0%) 25 (52%)
Zhan 2015 56 10–18 15 (27%) 6 (11%) 15 (27%) 20 (36%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 56 (100%) 0 (0%) 49 (88%) 28 (50%)
Perry 2017 39 8–18 6 (15%) 14 (36%) 15 (39%) 7 (18%) 4 (10%) 0 (0%) 13 (33%) 39 (100%) 0 (0%) 18 (46%) 18 (46%)
Summary 2017 1284 0–20 7% (89/1189) 43% (529/1228) 37% (444/1214) 12% (114/1214) 3% (114/1284) <1% (3/911) 14% (108/793) 98% (1225/1255) 3% (33/1255) 78% (283/361) 65% (603/922)

Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; GH, growth hormone; GTR, gross total resection; PRL, prolactin; RT, radiotherapy; Rx, pharmacotherapy; TCR, transcranial resection; TSR, transsphenoidal resection.

a

Mean age reported

Table 5. Systematic review of surgical series of pediatric pituitary adenoma: recurrence, complications, outcome, and follow-up.

First author Year N Recurrent/persistent disease after initial operation Any repeat surgery b Any postoperative RT b Any postoperative Rx b BAX a Chronic postoperative pituitary insufficiency Permanent visual dysfunction Chronic diabetes insipidus Postoperative CSF leak Recurrent/persistent disease at last follow-up Median follow-up (mo.) c
Richmond c 1978 25 2 (8%) 0 (0%) 10 (40%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 1 (4%) 14 c
Fraioli 1983 9 1 (11%) 6 (67%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 48
Styne 1984 15 2 (13%) 1 (50%) 0 (0%) 7 (47%) 2 (13%) 0 (0%) 32
Fahlbusch 1986 14 5 (36%) 4 (80%) 5 (36%)
Laws 1987 76
Ludecke 1987 26 7 (27%) 7 (100%) 5 (71%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%)
Maira 1990 52 5 (10%) 4 (80%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 12–108
Haddad c 1991 16 9 (56%) 3 (33%) 2 (22%) 4 (44%) 2 (12%) 6 (38%) 55 c
Dyer 1994 66 10 (15%) 6 (60%) 6 (60%) 6 (60%) 1 (2%) 4 (5%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 6 (9%) 6–168
Kane 1994 56 37 (66%) 3 (8%) 21 (57%) 19 (51%) 6 (10%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 23 (41%) 84
Magiakou c 1994 50 3 (6%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (19%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 22 c
Partington 1994 36 15 (42%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%) 5 (33%) 14 (39%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 3 (8%) 60
Leinung 1995 22 12 (55%) 6 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (14%) 5 (23%) 0 (0%) 12 (55%) 80
Mindermann c 1995 136 14 (64%) 22 (100%) 3 (6%) 24 c
Weber 1995 9 3 (33%) 0 (0%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%) 4 (44%) 3 (33%) 0 (0%) 24–128
Devoe c 1997 35 8 (23%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%) 4 (11%) 5 (14%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 86 c
Massoud 1997 21 5 (24%) 3 (60%) 2 (40% 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 10 (48%) 1 (5%) 2 (10%) 0 (0%) 96
Abe c 1998 5 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 4 (80%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 132
Artese 1998 47 7 (15%) 0 (0%) 3 (43%) 4 (57%) 1 1 6 (13%)
Dissaneevate 1998 4 4 (100%) 0 (0%) 3 (75%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 4 (100%)
Abe c 1999 15 8 (53%) 0 (0%) 4 (50%) 8 (100%) 6 (33%) 0 (0%) 3 (20%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 74 c
Kunwar 1999 150
Fideleff 2000 15 8 (53%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (63%) 3 (20%) 0 (0%)
Tamura 2000 32 7 (22%) 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 3 (43%) 2 (6%)
Nishio c 2001 5 2 (40%) 0 (0%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (40%) 0 (0%) 1 (20%) 53 c
Abe 2002 14 5 (57%) 0 (0%) 7 (88%) 8 (100%) 3 (21%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 72 c
Cannavo 2003 27 19 (70%) 0 (0%) 8 (42%) 2 (11%) 9 (33%) 13 (48%) 4 (15%) 17 (63%) 60
Storr c 2003 18 7 (39%) 0 (0%) 7 (100%) 7 (100%) 0 (0%) 83 c
Kanter 2005 33 11 (33%) 3 (37%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 10 (30%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 3 (9%) 44
Das 2007 10 6 (60%) 1 (17%) 4 (67%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 82
Mehrazin 2007 21 12 (57%) 1 (8%) 8 (67%) 10 (83%) 1 (13%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 3 (14%) 11 (52%)
Webb c 2008 20 9 (45%) 6 (67%) 2 (22%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 50 c
Locatelli c 2010 12 1 (8%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%)
Oliveira 2010 15 7 (47%) 0 (0%) 4 (57%) 2 (29%) 4 (27%) 4 (27%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 139 c
Tarapore 2011 34 6 (18%) 0 (0%) 9 (150%) 6 (100%) 1 (10%) 8 (24%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 3 (9%) 18
Shah c 2011 48 17 (35%) 1 (4%) 8 (35%) 6 (26%) 4 (8%) 0 (0%) 5 (10%) 17 (35%) 59 c
Zhan c 2015 56 28 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (7%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 2 (4%) 52 c
Perry 2017 39 21 (54%) 10 (48%) 14 (67%) 11 (52%) 3 (%) 26 (67%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 2 (5%) 9 (23%) 87 (3–581)
Summary 2017 1284 35% (319/922) 8% (87/1024) 16% (157/995) 14% (110/798) 5% (28/554) 23% (116/713) 6% (24/405) 3% (23/691) 4% (24/583) 18% (140/768) 64

Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; BAX, bilateral adrenalectomy; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; RT, radiotherapy; Rx, pharmacotherapy.

a

Percentages of ACTH-secreting adenomas.

b

Percentages of recurrent tumors.

c

Mean follow-up reported; range shown if neither median nor mean reported.

Results

Overview of the Study Cohort

Thirty-nine pediatric pituitary adenoma patients at our institution were identified; median ages at times of diagnosis and surgery were 15 and 16 years, respectively (ranges 8–18 and 9–22, respectively). Symptoms at the time of presentation were diverse and heterogeneous, with the most common complaints including headache (67%), obesity/weight gain (41%), visual disturbance (36%), acne (31%), amenorrhea (28%), hirsutism (28%), and moon facies (26%; Table 1 ). Median maximum tumor diameter on preoperative imaging was 11 mm (range 1–40 mm). Among 39 adenomas, biochemical and pathologic analyses diagnosed 15 prolactinomas (39%), 14 corticotrophs (36%), 7 somatotrophs (18%), and 4 non-secreting adenomas (10%). Four tumors were plurihormonal (10%): three were positive for PRL and GH (8%), and one was positive for ACTH and GH (3%). Five tumors demonstrated atypical pathologic features (13%), and four ACTH-secreting tumors contained Crooke's hyaline change (29%). Underlying genetic conditions were present in one patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) and one with McCune–Albright syndrome.

Surgical Management and Outcomes

An initial trial of at least one pharmacologic agent was attempted in 13 (33%) patients, typically with bromocriptine or cabergoline, as well as one trial each of pergolide, octreotide, and pegvisomant ( Table 2 ). Transsphenoidal resection (TSR) was then attempted in 39 (100%) patients, 37 (95%) via either a sublabial, transsphenoidal, or transnasal transsphenoidal microsurgical technique and 2 (5%) using a purely endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). A primary surgical cure was obtained in 18 patients, in all of whom gross total resection (GTR) was achieved (46%).

Twenty-one patients experienced recurrent or progressive disease postoperatively. Repeat surgery was undertaken in 10 (26%), radiation of any modality was used in 14 (36%), 11 received pharmacotherapy (28%), and 3 underwent bilateral adrenalectomy (31% of ACTH-secreting tumors). Cumulatively, 39 patients underwent a total of 55 TSRs, 7 craniotomies, 13 stereotactic radiosurgeries (SRS), 5 courses of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 1 proton beam radiotherapy (PBRT), and 3 bilateral adrenalectomies (BAX). Detailed treatment courses are outlined in Table 3 . Atypical pathologic features were significantly associated with recurrent or persistent disease ( p  = 0.05).

At last clinical follow-up, disease cure had been achieved in 30 (77%) patients including 12 (31%) who had been treated for recurrent or persistent disease, while 9 (25%) remained with recurrent or persistent disease ( Table 2 ). Complications from any treatment included 26 patients with chronic pituitary insufficiency requiring supplementation of at least one hormone (67%), three cases (8%) of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and one case (3%) each of permanent visual dysfunction, chronic diabetes insipidus (DI), radiation necrosis, radiation-induced optic neuropathy, radiation-induced abducens palsy, or meningitis. Median total clinical follow up was 87 months (range 3–581). There were no mortalities in our series; however, one patient has initiated palliative care and is anticipated to expire due to primary disease.

Primary Stereotactic Radiosurgery

In addition to the 39 patients described above, we separately identified 2 pediatric patients with pituitary adenoma who were treated with primary SRS, rather than TSR. In the former case, an 18-year-old with prolactinoma strongly desired to minimize risk of infertility, correspondingly refused surgery, and was offered SRS as an alternative. The treatment plan consisted of 25 Gy delivered to the 50% isodose line, to a treatment volume of 2.2 cm 3 for a maximum dose of 50 Gy. A biochemical cure was documented within 18 months, no permanent hormonal replacement therapies were required, and the patient was able to conceive as intended without fertility treatments. No recurrence has been documented in 7 years of clinical follow-up. The second patient had underlying McCune–Albright syndrome with severe fibrous dysplasia of the skull base and a radiographic adenoma that was considered GH producing by laboratory criteria, which obliterated the sphenoid sinus, precluding TSR. Correspondingly, SRS was offered, with a treatment plan of 20 Gy to the 60% isodose line to a total volume of 1.3 cm 3 , with a maximum dose of 33.3 Gy. The patient has remained symptom free off pharmacotherapy for over 5 years of follow-up, with minimal persistent supranormal elevation of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and normal GH.

Systematic Review

Literature search identified 37 English language publications reporting surgical series of pediatric pituitary adenomas meeting inclusion criteria with extractable by-patient data on the outcomes of interest, spanning 1978 to 2015 ( Table 4 ). Together with the present series, 1,284 patients have been reported with pediatric pituitary adenoma. ACTH-secreting tumors were most frequently reported (43%), followed by PRL-secreting (37%), GH-secreting (12%), and nonsecreting (7%); plurihormonal tumors were reported in 3%. Less than 1% of all tumors were radiated prior to TSR ( n  = 3), while 14% had been trialed on at least one medication. TSR was the approach of choice in 98% of patients. Extent-of-resection was only documented in 28% of cases; among those, GTR was reported in 78%. Disease was cured with primary surgery in 65%.

The remaining 35% were reported as having recurrent or persistent disease after the initial operation ( Table 5 ). Treatment paradigms were very heterogeneous, follow-up in many prior series was short, and adjuvant therapy was incompletely documented in many manuscripts; notwithstanding, among those patients with recurrent or persistent disease, at least 8% underwent repeat surgery, 16% were radiated, and 14% received postoperative pharmacotherapy. Reported complications included postoperative pituitary insufficiency requiring pharmacologic supplementation in 23%, permanent visual dysfunction in 6%, chronic DI in 3%, and postoperative CSF leak in 4%. Follow-up data was inconsistently reported, but approximate mean follow-up was 63 months (range 0–240, excluding present series). At the time of last follow-up, 18% had recurrent or persistent disease.

Discussion Part One: Lessons from the Study Cohort and Literature Review

In setting the stage for our broader survey of the topic, we reviewed our surgical series of 39 pediatric pituitary adenomas, as well as the preceding literature documenting related cohorts. Several key observations stood out, which collectively reaffirmed the disease's intrinsic challenges.

In our series and literature review, the rates of recurrent or persistent disease after primary surgery were 54% and 35%, respectively, which reflect a two- to three-fold increase from large adult series that have approximated recurrence rates for nonfunctioning, PRL-secreting, ACTH-secreting, and GH-secreting tumors at 16%, 13%, 12%, and 1.3%, respectively. 12 13 However, our finding are consistent with previous pediatric reviews, which have suggested that secretory pituitary disease is more difficult to control and prone to recurrence in children, particularly Cushing disease, which is estimated to have a 40% 10-year recurrence rate in children—although this conclusion has not been universally reproduced. 2 12 13 14 15 16 Of note, the higher recurrence rate noted in the study cohort most likely reflects the observed differences in follow-up, as well as a potential underlying reporting bias, given the established tendency for studies to under-report true long-term recurrence rates—particularly in Cushing's disease. 2 16 17 18 19

In the setting of tumor recurrence, adults also appear to be more easily managed than children are. In adults, repeat surgery is an effective first-line treatment for recurrent or persistent tumor without cavernous sinus involvement, and prior series have documented a biochemical cure in up to 57% of secreting tumors after a second TSR, which is a marked improvement compared with our pediatric results (30%). 20 By extension, the clinical trajectories in recurrent or persistent disease have the potential to be quite discouraging in children, with only 7 (33%) of 21 patients reaching a cure after a single treatment for recurrence, and 8 (38%) of 21 patients requiring treatment with at least three different modalities beyond primary TSR.

The pediatric pituitary adenoma population is also especially vulnerable to hypopituitarism, due in large part to the high incidence of recurrence and multi-modality treatments. 21 22 Although most complications in the present study were rare and comparable to those associated with adult disease, permanent pituitary replacement therapy was required in 67% of our patients, as compared with 2 to 27% in major preceding adult reviews (and up to 55% in isolated series). 23 24 This contrast is in spite of the fact that hypopituitarism is strongly associated with tumor size, but pediatric tumors are more likely to be microadenomas, with a median maximum tumor diameter of 11 mm in the study cohort (range 1–40 mm). 25 26 Although our literature review documented a lower overall rate at 23% (range 4–80%), this difference again most likely reflects our increased follow-up time, as well as the higher fraction of recurrent or progressive tumors in our cohort (54% in the study cohort, versus 35% overall), or potentially under-reporting in the literature. Regardless, the possibility that two-thirds of pediatric patients may suffer some degree of endocrine deficiency has dramatic implications, especially with respect to growth and development and fertility. 2 10 27 28 29 With this in mind, we turn to an overview of the key concepts in pediatric pituitary adenoma management.

Discussion, Part Two: Key Concepts in Pediatric Pituitary Adenoma Management

Epidemiology and Genetics

Approximately 3 to 9% of pituitary adenomas occur in children, which corresponds to 3% of all pediatric intracranial neoplasms. 2 6 7 30 The overall prevalence of pituitary adenoma may be increased among female children up to 2:1, due to the marked prolactinoma predominance in girls. 2 4 9 10 27 28 31 Sporadic pituitary adenomas have been documented to harbor a wide range of mutations involving common tumor suppressor or oncogenes, including GNAS, PTTG, HMGA2, and FGFR-4 . 28 32 33 Although clear correlations between disease phenotype and underlying genetic abnormalities remain incompletely understood, several interesting relationships have been characterized—most prominently, the 40% prevalence of GNAS- activating mutations in somatotrophic tumors. 28 34

Associations with genetic syndromes are rare, but potentially an important consideration in younger patients with pituitary adenoma. MEN-1 is the most common such association and has been reported to present with pituitary adenoma in children as young as 5 years. 28 35 The syndrome arises in patients who inherit a single mutated allele of the menin tumor suppressor gene, and subsequently acquire a “second hit.” 36 37 38 39 Individuals bearing the menin mutation have a 30 to 40% lifetime risk of pituitary adenoma; ∼60% of which secrete PRL and 20% GH. 40

A second important association is the McCune–Albright syndrome, in which a non-heritable postzygotic activating GNAS mutation yields a range of endocrinologic derangements, café au lait spots, and polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. 28 41 42 Correspondingly, pituitary surgery can be prohibitively challenging, and when undertaken, may require extensive drilling to effectively create the entire transsphenoidal working corridor. Correspondingly, SRS may be the preferred first-line treatment for these children, as in our case, described above.

Carney complex is a very rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by endocrine hyperactivity, myxomas, lentigines, schwannomas, and adenomas, which is caused by an inactivating mutation of the PKAR1A gene in 60% of patients, though the underlying mechanism in the remaining families is incompletely understood. 28 43 44 Interestingly, Carney complex patients frequently present with non-pituitary Cushing's syndrome due to primary adrenocortical neoplasms and then subsequently develop GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, which are characteristically slow-growing and difficult to identify on imaging. 28 44 45 46

Familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) is a term used to describe families with two or more first degree relatives developing pituitary adenomas that are negative for menin or PRKARIA mutations. 28 Of the 211 families described, ∼20% harbor an inactivating heterozygous germline mutation of the tumor suppressor gene AIP . 47 48 49 No definitive trends have been established regarding disease features within these patients, which may reflect the low disease penetrance. Although PRL- and GH-secreting tumors predominate, the full range of pituitary pathologies has been described.

Clinical Presentation

Pediatric pituitary adenoma presentation varies by hormonal subtype, each of which can be loosely grouped by the relative onset of symptoms. Non-secreting tumors are the least common, as they rarely have time for sufficient growth to produce symptoms while the patient remains in childhood. Correspondingly, when they do appear, these tumors generally occur in post-pubescent individuals, who are best approached and treated as young adults. 4 8 10

GH-secreting tumors are uncommon, often present in pre-pubertal children and infants, and preferentially arise in males at a 2:1 incidence with precipitous growth, acromegaly, or headaches—although pubertal arrest or primary amenorrhea may be rare presentations of a GH-secreting adenoma masquerading as a microprolactinoma. 4 6 ACTH-secreting tumors occur slightly later in childhood, with peak incidence at the onset of puberty, and an overall 3:1 female predominance. 4 6 14 50 Classic symptoms of hyperadrenocorticotrophism are prototypical and range from Cushingoid appearance to growth arrest, weight gain, amenorrhea, mental status changes, hypertension, and hyperglycemia. 14 15

Most prior reviews and textbooks have reported PRL-secreting tumors as the most common pediatric pituitary adenomas; the vast majority of which come to clinical attention during puberty, with a 5:1 female predominance. 4 51 Primary and secondary amenorrhea account for three-quarters of their presentations, while male children present with growth arrest, delayed puberty, or galactorrhea. 4 52 53 Interestingly, although PRL-secreting tumors are more common overall, as our series and review demonstrate, ACTH-secreting tumors are the largest fraction of tumors that are surgically treated. 4 27 51 54 55 This potentially attributable to a publication bias, particularly since there has been so much academic interest within the neurosurgical and endocrinologic communities regarding pediatric Cushing disease. 14 15 56 57 More likely, this trend reflects the responsiveness of prolactinomas to pharmacotherapy and the general bias against early surgery in the pediatric population. 28 53 58

In contrast to adults, children rarely present with focal neurologic signs. 2 5 55 Visual dysfunction is a hallmark of the nonfunctioning macroadenomas that dominate adult disease, but occurs in fewer than 10% children—although Webb et al documented 60% in one study of 20 children, which was also notable for a higher than average incidence of macroadenoma. 2 3 5 55 As Webb's cohort demonstrates, this difference can be attributed to the predominance of secreting tumors among children, who are also thought to be more physically and psychosocially sensitized to the effects of hyperprolactinemia. 51 52 55

Preoperative Endocrinologic Evaluation

As in adults, preoperative assessment in children incorporates diagnostic and confirmatory biochemical studies, as well as focused neuroimaging, and formal neuro-ophthalmologic examination with visual field testing. Serum studies panel of anterior pituitary hormones including PRL, ACTH, GH, TSH, LH, and FSH is requisite, both to screen for secondary subclinical abnormalities and to evaluate for possible preoperative pituitary insufficiency.

Laboratory evaluation for prolactinoma begins with a simple serum PRL assay, and although reliable reference ranges have not been definitely established in children, 5 to 25 ng/mL in girls and 5 to 15 ng/mL in boys are generally considered normal, with a peak in puberty. 58 Supranormal PRL levels below 100 ng/mL may be attributable to the so-called “stalk effect,” in which a macroadenoma compresses the pituitary infundibulum, decreasing tonic dopaminergic inhibition of PRL and producing the mild abnormality. 29 59 A normal or mildly supranormal PRL with severe symptoms should raise suspicion for the high-dose “hook effect,” especially in the setting of a large tumor. This laboratory phenomenon occurs due to an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique that depends on two-site binding (capture and signal antibodies) for a positive result, which becomes saturated in the presence of extremely high serum PRL concentrations, “hooking” the measured value downward. 60 61 62 63 Above 100 ng/mL, prolactinoma is relatively assured and certain above 200 ng/mL—although results below these thresholds do not exclude the possibility of a true, secreting prolactinoma. 53 58

Although serum GH concentration can be readily measured, it is subject to normal diurnal variations and is influenced by a wide swath of physiologic activities including exercise, stress, fasting states, and sleep, potentially resulting in a normal range from 0.5 to 30 ng/mL in a single day. 64 65 66 Correspondingly, IGF-1 has been developed as a surrogate marker that reflects the overall physiologic mean GH value during the preceding 24 to 48 hour period. 67 However, given that both GH and IGF-1 fluctuate with age and are physiologically elevated during adolescence and puberty, multiple measurements of both values are recommended in equivocal cases. 6 In parallel, the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is a highly specific confirmatory test, in which patients drink a 75 g glucose load; GH suppression to <1 ng/mL within 2 hours of ingestion indicates a normal response, whereas value >2 ng/mL is considered diagnostic, and 1 to 2 ng/mL is strongly suggestive of acromegaly. 68

Cushing's disease is suggested by hypercortisolism with elevated serum ACTH levels: concentrations from 5 to 20 pg/mL are highly consistent with an ACTH-dependent process and >20 pg/mL are diagnostic. 69 70 71 Ectopic ACTH production must subsequently be ruled out, typically using a combination of high-dose dexamethasone suppression (HDDS) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation tests. 72 In true Cushing's disease, overnight administration of oral high-dose dexamethasone will reduce 8 am cortisol to <5 mcg/dL (or below 50% of baseline), while intravenous injection of CRH results in a marked increase in both ACTH and cortisol within 45 minutes—an effect that can be potentiated by pre-treating with vasopressin, although that is rarely required in children (positive test thresholds are specific to the center and protocol). 73 74 Ectopic ACTH generally does not respond to either agent. Positive results on both HDDS and CRH is highly specific for Cushing's disease, and a positive CRH test coupled with an unambiguous adenoma on pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered diagnostic; however, absent positive imaging and conflicting results between HDDS and CRH may prompt inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) for diagnosis and lateralization.

In this test, the bilateral inferior petrosal dural venous sinuses are endovascularly canalized and sampled. ACTH values from centrally drawn samples are then compared with ones from the peripheral blood, and an ACTH gradient >2 is diagnostic of Cushing's disease, with a 95% sensitivity and 93% specificity. 75 These results can be further elevated to 95 to 100% sensitivity and specificity by administering CRH and using a diagnostic threshold >3. 76 However, minor proximal misplacement of the catheter may yield a false negative, and although the rate of serious complications is quite low, rare cerebrovascular accidents or cranial nerve palsies have been reported, and the logistics of completing the procedure in children are potentially complex. 77 78 79 Correspondingly, our practice has been to avoid subjecting children to this intervention whenever possible (it was required in 1 of 14 ACTH-secreting tumors in the study cohort). Finally, although IPSS is a potentially powerful diagnostic tool in patients with equivocal biochemistry, its use as a lateralization technique to guide hemi-hypophysectomy is more controversial. Several studies have reported successful localization resulting in biochemical cure in 71 to 74% of patients; however, others have failed to reproduce this result or improve significantly on the baseline odds of 50%. 14 76 80 81

Imaging and Ophthalmologic Assessment

Contrast-enhanced MRI with thin (1–3 mm) coronal slices through the sella is the bedrock of pituitary adenoma imaging and provides essential information for diagnosis and surgical planning ( Fig. 2 ). Arbitrarily, pituitary adenomas have been traditionally separated into micro- and macroadenomas using the 10-mm maximum diameter threshold, although both are commonly seen in children, microadenomas predominate, given the predominance of secreting lesions. 10 82 83 Prolactinomas are the exception to this principle and have a more expansive growth pattern that predisposes to macroadenoma formation—particularly in young males—as well as a tendency to present in older children who are more likely to harbor larger tumors. 28

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of the brain in the coronal and sagittal planes ( A and B ) demonstrates a hypo-enhancing eccentric left sellar masses (red arrows) surrounded by briskly enhancing normal hypophyseal tissue, characteristic of pituitary microadenoma. Pre-contrast sagittal T1-weighted and coronal MPRAGE images ( B ) demonstrate a large, well-circumscribed, sellar mass with surrounding benign bony remodeling, significant superior displacement of the optic chiasm (red arrow), and internal heterogeneity, consistent with a partially hemorrhagic pituitary macroadenoma. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted coronal and axial images ( C ) demonstrate a large, vividly enhancing sellar mass, with invasion of the bilateral cavernous sinuses, encasement of the internal carotid arteries, and significant suprasellar and middle fossa extension, suggestive of an aggressive pituitary macroadenoma. MPRAGE, magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

On routine sequences, adenomas are frequently appreciable on pre-contrast T1-weighted images as well demarcated hypointense regions when compared with normal gland—a differentiation that is augmented by the normal gland's robust gadolinium-uptake on contrast-enhanced scans. Contrast-enhanced images are particularly important in the assessment of ACTH-secreting microadenomas, which are typically the smallest lesions and the most likely to enhance. 83 84 Dynamic MR techniques rely on rapidly repeated scans, which capture the wash-in and wash-out of contrast to demonstrate a time-dependent pattern of early gland enhancement, followed by delayed adenoma enhancement, optimizing visualization of the lesion.

While microadenomas may be difficult to identify, macroadenomas are self-evident lesions that fill and frequently expand the sella or invade the cavernous sinuses and are much more likely to demonstrate internal heterogeneity due to hemorrhage or necrosis—especially if bromocriptine therapy was previously attempted. 83 85 Although not universally necessary, non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) is an important adjunct in atypical lesions where craniopharyngioma or meningioma is on the differential. In these circumstances, calcification or hyperostosis favors an alternative diagnosis, while a purely intrasellar lesion with benign bony expansion is more likely to indicate adenoma. 86

Although visual dysfunction is uncommon in children due to the low incidence of macroadenoma, ophthalmologic evaluation with visual field testing is recommended where possible. The purpose is two-fold: first, awareness and articulation of subtle visual symptoms is less reliable in children; and second, it provides formal documentation of the patient's preoperative baseline.

Medical Management and The Role of Deferred Surgery

Although TSR is the preferred first-line treatment for most pituitary tumors, prolactinomas warrant a trial of medical management with dopamine agonists before a surgical intervention is considered. Cabergoline is typically more effective and better tolerated than its pharmacologic predecessor bromocriptine, with stable biochemical remission documented in 70% of macroadenomas and 80 to 90% of microadenomas. 87 88 89 90 Cabergoline also has the advantages of a once- or twice-weekly 0.25 to 2 mg dose formulation and decreased incidence of major adverse events including hemorrhage and spontaneous CSF leak—although intolerable side effects remain the chief etiology of treatment failure. 91 92 93 Of note, female patients desiring fertility should be preferentially placed on bromocriptine, as it had a more well-characterized safety profile. 94 95 96 97 98

In some individuals, medical monotherapy may provide a sustained cure. 99 Colao et al reported 64 to 69% sustained remission at 5 years after a 2-year treatment period with cabergoline, a marked improvement over 7 to 38% described previously after cessation of bromocriptine. 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 Still other new data on pergolide, lisuride, and quinagolide have demonstrated comparable or superior efficacy to cabergoline with respect to biochemical remission and tumor regression; however, each is still awaiting the Food and Drug Administration approval, particularly with respect to the potential risk of valve disease in association with chronic exposure to these agents. 29 107 108 109 These findings are promising; however, given the elevated risk of recurrence in younger patients, extrapolations to the pediatric population are guarded.

While the majority of patients with prolactinoma will benefit from an initial trial of medical management, particularly in the pediatric population, there are several relative indications for early surgical intervention, including acute visual loss or cranial nerve palsy. 29 110 111 As these sequelae typically occur in large, invasive macroadenomas, a surgical cure may not be obtained, but decompression relieves mass effect, and tumor cytoreduction will potentiate response to anti-dopaminergic therapy. 112 113 Multi-modal therapy is often required in these patients, in particular SRS, to treat cavernous sinus disease, but TSR is almost always preferred route for acute decompression of the optic apparatus. 29 Similarly, patients who have a very low probability of tumor control with pharmacotherapy may benefit from initial surgical treatment, as dopamine agonists may increase tumor fibrosis, predisposing to a more challenging resection. 114

By contrast, the somatostatin analog octreotide has been shown to biochemically normalize GH hypersecretion in up to 55% of adults and induce a degree of radiographic tumor remission in 25 to 70%, but has not been shown to provide a durable disease cure, and the potential risks of life-long therapy in children are not established. 115 116 117 Some prior studies have demonstrated improved surgical cure rates after octreotide pretreatment; however, this has not been consistently reproduced, and neither a dose–response relationship nor an ideal duration-of-pretreatment is established. 118 119 120 Correspondingly, we do not recommend the first-line medical therapy for most children with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. 117

Transsphenoidal Surgery, Skull Base Techniques, and Special Consideration in Pediatrics

TSR is the preferred treatment for pituitary adenoma in the overwhelming majority of circumstances, particularly given that most are limited to the sellar or midline suprasellar regions. 5 11 121 122 Sellar microadenomas predominate in the pediatric population, making a large fraction potentially amendable to primary TSR; however, sphenoid sinus pneumatization has the potential to limit the operative corridor. Although first observed as early as 6 months in some children, the pneumatization process predominantly occurs during years 3 to 7, and the completion may take until the child is 9 to 12. 123 124 125

In some patients with partial pneumatization, the midline sphenoid bone can potentially be removed with a high-speed drill to provide access to the sella, which is often preferable to a transcranial approach for small, intrasellar lesions. 8 56 126 Radiology-based anatomic studies have described approximate drilling distances by age group, which can be correlated with preoperative imaging (ideally, a stereotactic CT scan). 127 128 Of note, even among the youngest children studied, clival inter-carotid distances never prohibited transsphenoidal surgery. However, pedicled nasoseptal flaps are difficult to raise in patients aged <10 years and questionable in patients 10 to 13 years, potentially limiting reconstructive options if an elevated risk of CSF leak is anticipated. 129 Finally, even modern endoscopic instruments may still be very large for safe, efficient use in smaller nares; correspondingly, a sublabial approach may be preferred in up to 39%. 130 Additionally, image guidance may be extremely helpful to guide the drilling necessary to better establish a transsphenoidal corridor.

A related technical question is centered on the comparison between microscopic and endoscopic techniques for pediatric pituitary tumor resection. In the adult population, this question has been interrogated for pituitary adenoma as well as a wide range of other midline cranial base neoplasms, with generally equivocal findings. Results have varied widely between centers and surgeons, and EEA is generally accepted as a non-inferior alternative to microsurgery. Most reports suggest EEA has improved rates of GTR and improvement of visual function and decreased rates of pituitary insufficiency but there has been concern of a higher rate of carotid artery injury. 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 Few prospective trials comparing EEA and microsurgery have been completed, with five meeting criteria for inclusion in a recent meta-analysis. 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 Although the overall evidence level and data quality were quite low, the study concluded that EEA is associated with significantly lower complication rates, but not biochemical cure, as compared with microscopic TSR. Further prospective study is clearly required to answer this question more definitively, particularly in children.

Neither prospective studies have compared the techniques in children, nor has any retrospective study specifically taken up the EEA question in pediatric pituitary adenoma. Massimi et al reviewed a 31-patient series comparing 14 sublabial microsurgical and 17 EEA operations in a mixed population of pediatric neoplasms that included adenomas, but with a majority of craniopharyngiomas. 146 Mean ages were comparable at 11.4 and 10.2 years, and there were no significant differences between the groups preoperatively. Tumor control and complication rates were not significantly different, although EEA was associated with fewer pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission, shorter hospitalizations, and lower pain scores. Rigante et al reported another mixed series comparing 11 sublabial microsurgical and 10 EEA operations from the same group, with comparable results. 147 In addition to these direct comparisons, several other authors have published self-referencing series juxtaposing newer endoscopic results to prior microsurgical series, most of which have concluded that extent-of-resection, pituitary insufficiency, and CSF leak are stable, but not significantly improved after EEA. 126 136 148 149

Advocates of EEA in the pediatric population suggest that it is associated with decreased trauma to the anterior nasopharynx (no nasal speculum) and a faster, less morbid recovery. 150 Opponents highlight longer operative times, the theoretically increased risk of carotid injury, and the need for a wider corridor, potentially mandating more extensive drilling of incompletely pneumatized sinuses. EEA was previously thought to risk disruption of the craniofacial growth plates, predisposing to deformity; although rational, this hypothesis has been disproven, with no cases of delayed disfigurement identified in the several large series publishing the first long-term perspectives on EEA in children. 48 126 148 151

A final consideration regarding EEA for pediatric pituitary adenoma is the finding that, in individual surgeons and the neurosurgical community at large, adoption of EEA has a clear learning curve, with significantly worse outcomes anticipated during the earliest phase. 152 153 154 155 156 Given the scarcity of pediatric tumors requiring TSR, the significant morbidity associated with a poor surgical outcome, and the relative youth of the approach—particularly as compared with the depth of experience among more senior practitioners of transsphenoidal microsurgery—we recommend that treatment for pediatric pituitary tumors be concentrated in centers-of-excellence and eschew the use of EEA by inexperienced surgeons.

Although uncommon in children, significant suprasellar tumor extension beyond the midline corridor and into the Sylvian fissure presents an important indication for transcranial or combined approaches. 157 158 In many of these tumors, pituitary function is already severely compromised; therefore, the endocrine risks of accessing the sella laterally are less pronounced. However, a prefixed chiasm may present a daunting obstacle; therefore, in such cases, a pterional approach is typically preferred, as it allows the shortest and most direct possible transcranial trajectory to the sub- and retrochiasmatic spaces. 159 By contrast, in patients with a postfixed chiasm and significant tumor between the optic nerves or extending anterior to the tuberculum sella, a subfrontal or transbasal approach may warrant consideration—including the unilateral subfrontal, which minimizes risk to the frontal sinus or olfactory system.

For especially large, expansive tumors and recurrences that extend along the sellar and parasellar axes, anterolateral approaches can be expanded via orbitozygomatic or orbital-optic osteotomies, allowing greater access with minimized frontal lobe retraction. 159 160 Less frequently indicated are transpetrosal or transcavernous approaches; however, they may prove useful in cases of large, invasive pituitary adenoma with significant extension throughout the retrochiasmatic, interpeduncular, or prepontine spaces. Rarely, remarkably aggressive tumors are reported with widespread posterior fossa involvement, and these lateral skull base techniques are requisite for debulking. 161 162

Focused Review of Pathologic Features

The pathologic classification of pituitary tumors is extensive, and based on a combination of features including hormonal content, cell type, and ultrastructural morphology, which collectively outline 18 specific adenoma subtypes as of the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. 163 164 165 166 Each adenoma subtype has predictable biologic patterns of behavior, with implications in terms of capacity for recurrence, overall prognosis, and response to treatment. Although these patterns have been derived from adult populations, the dominant pathologies are in parallel among children, with granulated PRL cell adenoma, densely granulated growth hormone cell adenoma, and densely granulated corticotroph adenoma comprising 27.0%, 7.1%, and 9.6%, respectively of all pituitary tumors, and therefore the overwhelming majority of secreting adenomas. 163 165 166 Characteristic corticotroph-type tumors show diffuse adenoma cells, with loss of typical reticulated nesting, and diffuse ACTH positive staining ( Fig. 3AC ).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Histopathologic photomicrographs demonstrating a corticotroph-type tumor with typical features including diffuse adenoma cells ( A , H&E, 200X), loss of typical reticulated nesting ( B , Reticulin, 200X), and diffusely positive immunohistochemical staining for ACTH ( C , ACTH, 200X). Crooke's cell adenoma, with characteristic strongly positive perinuclear CAM5.2 staining ( D and E , CAM5.2, 400X), and a corresponding haloing of perinuclear ACTH positivity ( F , ACTH, 400X). Atypical pituitary adenoma, demonstrating two mitoses (arrowheads) in a high-powered field ( G , H&E, 400X). ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Two interesting pathologic subtypes were observed at high rates among our patients: Crooke's cell adenoma and atypical adenoma. In ACTH-secreting tumors, pathologic accumulation of perinuclear cytokeratin within the suppressed normal gland cells is a common and clinically insignificant feature termed Crooke's hyaline change. However, when these changes are observed within adenoma cells, the diagnosis of a Crooke's cell adenoma is made, which is an aggressive but benign variant carrying a 60% risk of recurrence and 24% chance of multiple recurrence. 167 Characteristic pathologic features include faint perinuclear ACTH staining with correspondingly strong CAM5.2 staining ( Fig. 3DF ). Among the four patients diagnosed with Crooke's cell adenoma in our cohort, two were cured at primary TSR, one had two recurrences requiring repeat TSR followed by PBRT before a biochemical cure was established, and the final patient remained severely symptomatic in spite of multi-modality treatment including EBRT, multiple repeat TSRs, and a craniotomy, highlighting the potential for these tumors to be remarkably aggressive, particularly in recurrence-prone pediatric patients.

Atypical pituitary adenoma is defined by the presence of mitoses, K i -67 index >3%, and nuclear p53 staining with nuclear pleomorphism ( Fig. 3G ). 168 169 Adult series have approximated 3 to 15% incidence, as compared with the very rare 0.2% prevalence of pituitary carcinoma, with no clear correlation established between specific atypical features and disease phenotype. 165 166 170 171 In our series, we encountered five atypical adenomas (13%): all had complex histories requiring multi-modality treatment, and only one was ultimately cured. Taken together with the lack of reliable pathologic predictors of clinical behavior, we recommend close follow-up of all atypical lesions and prompt, aggressive treatment of any recurrence.

Management of Progression or Recurrence

Encouragingly, a significant fraction of pediatric pituitary adenomas do quite well following initial resection, with our own series and the literature review documenting a surgical cure in 46% and 65%, respectively. Notwithstanding, recurrent or persistent disease is a common, potentially morbid, and frequently often multiply occurring management challenge in pediatric patients.

The best choice for second-line therapy is very dependent on the characteristics of the recurrence and the patient. In patients with an anatomically accessible lesion, repeat surgery is typically offered, particularly if there was a period of apparent disease remission following the initial resection. Successful treatment with a second operation was observed in 14% of our patients and up to 57% in prior series of secreting tumors in adults. 20 172 However, many patients fail repeat surgery, and a large fraction have recurrent or progressive disease due to cavernous sinus involvement, which requires consideration of alternative modalities.

Pharmacotherapy is frequently trialed if repeat surgery is failed or not offered; however, patients with prolactinoma and many with GH-secreting lesions will have failed preoperative medical therapy and are unlikely to achieve durable symptomatic or biochemical disease control. Additionally, as recurrence indicates a more aggressive disease phenotype, treatment with the goal of a definitive cure is recommended. A specific exception is made for pre- or peripubertal children without severe symptoms, in whom temporizing with medication to delay radiation may be recommended—particularly if they are cabergoline- or octreotide-naïve. Combination therapies may also be effective, for example the addition of cabergoline or the GH receptor agonist pegvisomant to octreotide, which has been shown to be act synergistically in controlling recurrent GH-secreting adenomas in adults. 116 117 Of note, all anti-tumor medications should be discontinued prior to radiation if at all possible, as dopamine and somatostatin antagonist appear to confer a radio-protective effect on tumor cells. 173 174 175

In adults, non-operative pituitary recurrences respond quite favorably to radiation—in particular, SRS. Prior series have reported treatment success in 97% of nonsecreting tumors and 45 to 93% secreting adenomas, with Pollock estimating an overall success rate of durable biochemical cure in at least 60% of recurrent secreting tumors. 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 Hypopituitarism is the most common complication, with 10 to 12% of adults requiring chronic hormonal supplementation after SRS. 16 48 181 182

Data on pediatric pituitary radiotherapy is more limited, due to its infrequent use; as our literature review demonstrates, radiation of any modality was reported in only 16% of children with recurrent or persistent disease. This reflects a general attitude of reluctance given the pronounced risk of hypopituitarism, as well as the more general (but still rare) complications of radiation in a young population with benign disease. GH deficiency in particular has been reported in up to 86 to 100% of pediatric patients after radiation, with rare reports describing symptomatic post-radiation deficiencies in the full range of anterior pituitary hormones. 16 183 Although this can be managed with supplementation, most patients still do not reach mid-parental target height. 57 184 185 Complications notwithstanding, our own results and those studies that have specifically reported outcomes in pediatric secretory disease have demonstrated compelling efficacy, with local control rates of 64 to 100% after recurrence across all modalities and tumor subtypes. 14 16 130

No study has yet compared EBRT and SRS in pediatric pituitary adenoma. Thoren et al reported a landmark series on SRS as primary treatment for pediatric Cushing's disease in 1986; eight patients were treated, of whom seven were cured, while one went on to BAX for persistent disease, and all eight required chronic pituitary supplementation. 183 In our series, 5 (36%) of 14 recurrences treated with radiation failed; however, when stratified by modality, 7 (70%) of 10 SRS and 1 (100%) PBRT patient were ultimately cured, as compared with 1 (25%) of 4 EBRT treatments. Based on the available data and our clinical experience, we recommend SRS over EBRT in patients with symptomatic recurrences refractory to medical treatment whose tumors have 3-mm margin between the optic nerve and the lesion, and a treatment volume <3 cm 3 . This disposition is further augmented by extrapolations from the adult population and data on pediatric radiation in malignant disease, which suggest a significantly increased long-term risk of cognitive impairment or the development of a radiation-induced neoplasm following EBRT, as well as faster remission of endocrine symptoms after SRS. 16 130 179 182 186 187 188

Large tumors abutting the optic nerve may still be managed using SRS and careful dose planning keeping the maximum optic nerve point dose <10 to 12 Gy; however, this may reduce the chance for biochemical cure in a hormone-producing tumor, as these usually require at least 20 Gy marginal doses. Alternatively, some centers recommend fractionated SRS, IMRT, or EBRT, supported by varying degrees of evidence. 48 181 182 Overall experience with PBRT for pediatric pituitary adenoma remains quite limited at present; however, preliminary adult series have reported post-radiation hypopituitarism in as few as 30% of patients with comparable local control to SRS, suggesting that it may become an important alternative modality as access expands and costs decline. 182 186 189 190 With respect to the broader clinical picture, patients undergoing radiation are recommended to discontinue any pituitary-suppressive pharmacotherapies for 2 to 4 weeks, to promote tumor cell division and therefore radiosensitivity.

Although ACTH-secreting adenomas are often radiosensitive, severe Cushing's disease has the potential to be both disabling and treatment resistant. BAX provides durable correction of symptomatic hypercortisolemia and was previously considered a preferable alternative to radiation in children. However, the treatment requires lifelong hormonal supplementation, and the decrease in negative feedback on adenoma cells resulting from the BAX may lead to a rapid and dangerous adenoma growth known as Nelson–Salassa syndrome, which is thought to be more prevalent and aggressive among younger patients. 191 Correspondingly, radiation is recommended prior to BAX in most pediatric cases, reserving BAX for those cases that fail both repeat surgery and radiation. If BAX is required for rapid correction of severe hypercortisolemia, prophylactic SRS may be offered concurrently, which has been shown to significantly decrease the risk of Nelson–Salassa syndrome in adults. 192 However, given our previous finding that a subset of Nelson–Salassa patients experience an indolent natural history, waiting for tumor growth following BAX is our preferred approach, in radiation-naïve children. 191 192

Rarely, atypical pituitary adenomas, carcinomas, or instances of Nelson–Salassa syndrome may be refractory to multi-modality treatments, as in two of our patients. Trials of chemotherapeutic agents in pituitary disease have been disappointing, but nevertheless they represent a potential last line of defense. 170 Temozolomide, a well-tolerated deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-alkylating agent that is widely used in glioma treatment, has demonstrated better efficacy than preceding chemotherapeutic regimens, with an overall clinical or radiographic response rate of 60 to 69%. 170 193 194 195 196 197 Newer targeted therapies are also undergoing active investigation as second-line, concomitant, or alternative agents in aggressive pituitary adenoma, including the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)2 inhibitor lapatinib. 198 199 200 201 At present, data are very limited even in the adult population, and the risk–benefit calculus of trialing any chemotherapy in a child will be determined on an individualized basis—although by this point in the natural history, patients have usually aged beyond the elevated risks of pediatric care.

Major Complications and their Management

Although a broad range of complications has been documented after pituitary adenoma treatment, most are rare occurrences, with pituitary insufficiency, DI, and CSF leak comprising the majority of significant treatment consequence. As described above, symptomatic deficiencies of anterior pituitary hormones are the most frequent complications of both surgery and radiation, with chronic pharmacologic supplementation required in ∼25% after surgery, 10% after radiation, and up to two-thirds complex patients with extended follow-up, as in the study own cohort. GH deficiency is the most common, with significant implications in children with respect to overall growth potential, as well as onset and duration of puberty. Thyroid and corticotropin deficiencies occur less frequently, but management with supplementation is uncomplicated and rarely morbid; gonadotropin deficiency is rare in the absence of panhypopituitarism, but may require treatment for secondary infertility. 6 202 In women with prolactinomas who retain normal gonadotropin function, inducing biochemical remission using bromocriptine is generally sufficient to promote normal fertilization; however, conception and obstetric care for women with refractory disease is potentially complex and may require an experienced reproductive endocrinologist. 203 204

Though typically transient, DI nevertheless has the potential to be a major management challenge and potentially life threatening in its most serious iterations. Macroadenomas, invasive or aggressive lesions, and patients presenting with subclinical sodium derangements at baseline are at especially high risk, but in all patients an elevated index of suspicion is warranted if postoperative urine output is brisk. 145 148 205 Pediatric resuscitation goals vary by age and weight, but core treatment principles include early administration of oral or subcutaneous desmopressin acetate (DDAVP), urine replacement with half-normal saline, and serial serum sodium checks. 206 Most patients recover in hours-to-days; however, some undergo poly-phasic cycles of polyuria and antidiuresis, while ∼3% develop stable euvolemic disease requiring chronic DDAVP. 54

Postoperative CSF leak has been estimated in 3 to 8% of pediatric TSR cases and been reported in up to 20% in some individual series, with significant risk factors including tumors with suprasellar extension, intraoperative CSF leak, or prior treatment with surgery, radiation, or dopamine agonists. 92 136 207 208 209 General management strategies are comparable to adults, with the specific exception that children younger than 10 to 13 years may not have adequate tissue to support a vascularized nasoseptal flap. 129 Similarly, although lumbar drainage may be attempted as a first-line intervention—potentially in combination with acetazolamide—the procedure may require sedation in children, and the drain itself is more prone to inadvertent removal. Correspondingly, most leaks are better managed via exploration and repair. Simple defects may be adequately treated with abdominal fat graft; however, larger fistulas or leaks in patients who have been radiated or multiply operated are more likely to be successfully treated with a nasoseptal flap or a comparable autograft, and multi-layer repair is universally recommended. 208 209 210 211

Conclusion

Pediatric pituitary adenomas are a diverse and remarkably challenging family of tumors; the ideal management of which is subject to a broad range of potentially complicating factors including restrictive anatomy, the predominance of secretory disease, and the potentially heightened vulnerability of these children to both treatment and disease morbidity. Complicating matters further, this vulnerability to major, life-altering endocrine dysfunction, such as infertility or growth arrest, may exert its own confounding influence on treatment patterns and disease natural history. By way of example, many studies have concluded that children are at higher risk of adenoma recurrence, yet it remains unknown whether this is attributable to a true phenotypic difference in disease aggressiveness or a reflection of a subtly more conservative treatment paradigm and almost impossible to discern retrospectively.

Notwithstanding, based on the available data, we have observed that most patients respond well to surgery and experience a swift and uncomplicated recovery; however, recurrent or persistent disease appears to be more frequent in children than in adults and may be more difficult to manage and marked by serial recurrences requiring multi-modality therapy. Ultimately, the plan of care must be tailored to the individual patient and tumor; however, we have consolidated our overarching strategy, and standard practices are consolidated into a treatment algorithm that can be adapted to the demands of specific cases ( Fig. 4 ).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Treatment algorithm for pediatric pituitary adenoma. ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; BAX, bilateral adrenalectomy; CRH, corticotropin releasing hormone; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; HDDS, high-dose dexamethasone suppression; IPSS, inferior petrosal sinus sampling; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PBRT, proton beam radiotherapy; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery; TSR, transsphenoidal resection.

In general terms, prolactinomas are trialed on cabergoline, while other adenomas and prolactinomas failing medical therapy or presenting with significant neurologic symptoms are offered surgery. Recurrent or persistent tumors are offered repeat surgery where anatomically feasible. Those recurrences not amenable to surgery may be successfully temporized with medications—particularly in prepubescent patients with mild symptoms—but the majority of these patients will ultimately require radiation, typically via single-fraction SRS. Cases of severe Cushing's disease may ultimately necessitate BAX, while extremely aggressive adenomas and carcinomas are potentially candidates for chemotherapy, with the caveat that these highly complex cases will inevitably require the most tailored and potentially unconventional treatment plans. Taken together, the study cohort and literature review inform our perspective on this challenging entity, but perhaps most importantly, they highlight the need for better evidence, and the development of an adaptive framework for translating the study of a rare and highly variable disease into rational, individualized patient care.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Dr. Aditya Raghunathan for his expert input and provision of histopathologic photomicrographs.

Conflicts of interest None.

Previous Presentations

Components of this work were presented or submitted as abstracts at the NASBS 2016 and CNS 2017.

References

  • 1.Espay A J, Azzarelli B, Williams L S, Bodensteiner J B. Recurrence in pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. J Child Neurol. 2001;16(05):364–367. doi: 10.1177/088307380101600510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kane L A, Leinung M C, Scheithauer B W et al. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(04):1135–1140. doi: 10.1210/jcem.79.4.7525627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maira G, Anile C. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. Can J Neurol Sci. 1990;17(01):83–87. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100030109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mindermann T, Wilson C B.Pediatric pituitary adenomas Neurosurgery 19953602259–268., discussion 269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Partington M D, Davis D H, Laws E R, Jr, Scheithauer B W. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. Results of transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(02):209–216. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abe T, Tara L A, Lüdecke D K. Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence: features and results of transnasal surgery. Neurosurgery. 1999;45(01):1–10. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199907000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Artese R, D'Osvaldo D H, Molocznik I et al. Pituitary tumors in adolescent patients. Neurol Res. 1998;20(05):415–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dyer E H, Civit T, Visot A, Delalande O, Derome P.Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas in children Neurosurgery 19943402207–212., discussion 212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kunwar S, Wilson C B. Pediatric pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(12):4385–4389. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.12.6240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lafferty A R, Chrousos G P. Pituitary tumors in children and adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(12):4317–4323. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.12.6215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Massoud A F, Powell M, Williams R A, Hindmarsh P C, Brook C G. Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumours. Arch Dis Child. 1997;76(05):398–404. doi: 10.1136/adc.76.5.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jane J, Thapar K, Laws E. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2011. Pituitary tumors: functioning and nonfunctioning. Youmans Neurological Surgery; pp. 1476–1510. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jane J A, Jr, Laws E R., Jr The surgical management of pituitary adenomas in a series of 3,093 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(06):651–659. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01101-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Joshi S M, Hewitt R J, Storr H Let al. Cushing's disease in children and adolescents: 20 years of experience in a single neurosurgical center Neurosurgery 20055702281–285., discussion 281–285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shah N S, George J, Acharya S V et al. Cushing disease in children and adolescents: twenty years' experience in a tertiary care center in India. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(03):369–376. doi: 10.4158/EP10143.OR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Storr H L, Plowman P N, Carroll P V et al. Clinical and endocrine responses to pituitary radiotherapy in pediatric Cushing's disease: an effective second-line treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(01):34–37. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Atkinson A B, Kennedy A, Wiggam M I, McCance D R, Sheridan B. Long-term remission rates after pituitary surgery for Cushing's disease: the need for long-term surveillance. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2005;63(05):549–559. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bochicchio D, Losa M, Buchfelder M. Factors influencing the immediate and late outcome of Cushing's disease treated by transsphenoidal surgery: a retrospective study by the European Cushing's Disease Survey Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(11):3114–3120. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.11.7593411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rees D A, Hanna F W, Davies J S, Mills R G, Vafidis J, Scanlon M F. Long-term follow-up results of transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease in a single centre using strict criteria for remission. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2002;56(04):541–551. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Benveniste R J, King W A, Walsh J, Lee J S, Delman B N, Post K D. Repeated transsphenoidal surgery to treat recurrent or residual pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(06):1004–1012. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.6.1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Friedman R B, Oldfield E H, Nieman L K et al. Repeat transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. J Neurosurg. 1989;71(04):520–527. doi: 10.3171/jns.1989.71.4.0520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patil C G, Veeravagu A, Prevedello D M, Katznelson L, Vance M L, Laws E R., JrOutcomes after repeat transsphenoidal surgery for recurrent Cushing's disease Neurosurgery 20086302266–270., discussion 270–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baskin D S, Boggan J E, Wilson C B. Transsphenoidal microsurgical removal of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. A review of 137 cases. J Neurosurg. 1982;56(05):634–641. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.56.5.0634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sudhakar N, Ray A, Vafidis J A. Complications after trans-sphenoidal surgery: our experience and a review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg. 2004;18(05):507–512. doi: 10.1080/02688690400012459a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fatemi N, Dusick J R, Mattozo Cet al. Pituitary hormonal loss and recovery after transsphenoidal adenoma removal Neurosurgery 20086304709–718., discussion 718–719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nomikos P, Ladar C, Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder M. Impact of primary surgery on pituitary function in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas -- a study on 721 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004;146(01):27–35. doi: 10.1007/s00701-003-0174-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Katavetin P, Cheunsuchon P, Swearingen B, Hedley-Whyte E T, Misra M, Levitsky L L. Review: Pituitary adenomas in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2010;23(05):427–431. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2010.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Keil M F, Stratakis C A. Pituitary tumors in childhood: update of diagnosis, treatment and molecular genetics. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008;8(04):563–574. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.4.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu J K, Couldwell W T. Contemporary management of prolactinomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16(04):E2. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.16.4.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Faglia G, Spada A. Genesis of pituitary adenomas: state of the art. J Neurooncol. 2001;54(02):95–110. doi: 10.1023/a:1012988828164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nishio S, Morioka T, Suzuki S, Takeshita I, Fukui M, Iwaki T. Pituitary tumours in adolescence: clinical behaviour and neuroimaging features of seven cases. J Clin Neurosci. 2001;8(03):231–234. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2000.0758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alexander J M, Biller B M, Bikkal H, Zervas N T, Arnold A, Klibanski A. Clinically nonfunctioning pituitary tumors are monoclonal in origin. J Clin Invest. 1990;86(01):336–340. doi: 10.1172/JCI114705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spada A, Mantovani G, Lania A. Pathogenesis of prolactinomas. Pituitary. 2005;8(01):7–15. doi: 10.1007/s11102-005-5080-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Heaney A P, Melmed S. Molecular targets in pituitary tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(04):285–295. doi: 10.1038/nrc1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stratakis C A, Schussheim D H, Freedman S M et al. Pituitary macroadenoma in a 5-year-old: an early expression of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(12):4776–4780. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.12.7064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marx S J, Agarwal S K, Kester M Bet al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: clinical and genetic features of the hereditary endocrine neoplasias Recent Prog Horm Res 199954397–438., discussion 438–439 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Spada A.Genetic aspects of pituitary tumors J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 200114051213–1216., discussion 1261–1262 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Thakker R V, Bouloux P, Wooding C et al. Association of parathyroid tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with loss of alleles on chromosome 11. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(04):218–224. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198907273210403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vergès B, Boureille F, Goudet P et al. Pituitary disease in MEN type 1 (MEN1): data from the France-Belgium MEN1 multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(02):457–465. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.2.8145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Asa S L, Ezzat S. The pathogenesis of pituitary tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(11):836–849. doi: 10.1038/nrc926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Akintoye S O, Chebli C, Booher S et al. Characterization of gsp-mediated growth hormone excess in the context of McCune-Albright syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(11):5104–5112. doi: 10.1210/jc.2001-012022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Koch G, Tiwisina T. [Contribution to the heredity of acromegaly and hyperostosis generalisata with pachyderma (chromophobe hypophysis adenoma in father and son] Arztl Forsch. 1959;13:489–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Boikos S A, Stratakis C A.Carney complex: pathology and molecular genetics Neuroendocrinology 200683(3-4):189–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Boikos S A, Stratakis C A. Pituitary pathology in patients with Carney Complex: growth-hormone producing hyperplasia or tumors and their association with other abnormalities. Pituitary. 2006;9(03):203–209. doi: 10.1007/s11102-006-0265-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kurtkaya-Yapicier O, Scheithauer B W, Carney J A et al. Pituitary adenoma in Carney complex: an immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and immunoelectron microscopic study. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2002;26(06):345–353. doi: 10.1080/01913120290104656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pack S D, Kirschner L S, Pak E, Zhuang Z, Carney J A, Stratakis C A. Genetic and histologic studies of somatomammotropic pituitary tumors in patients with the “complex of spotty skin pigmentation, myxomas, endocrine overactivity and schwannomas” (Carney complex) J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(10):3860–3865. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.10.6875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Beckers A, Aaltonen L A, Daly A F, Karhu A. Familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) and the pituitary adenoma predisposition due to mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene. Endocr Rev. 2013;34(02):239–277. doi: 10.1210/er.2012-1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Guaraldi F, Storr H L, Ghizzoni L, Ghigo E, Savage M O. Paediatric pituitary adenomas: a decade of change. Horm Res Paediatr. 2014;81(03):145–155. doi: 10.1159/000357673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tichomirowa M A, Barlier A, Daly A F et al. High prevalence of AIP gene mutations following focused screening in young patients with sporadic pituitary macroadenomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(04):509–515. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fraioli B, Ferrante L, Celli P. Pituitary adenomas with onset during puberty. Features and treatment. J Neurosurg. 1983;59(04):590–595. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.4.0590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cannavò S, Venturino M, Curtò L et al. Clinical presentation and outcome of pituitary adenomas in teenagers. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2003;58(04):519–527. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01748.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dissaneevate P, Warne G L. Hyperprolactinaemia and pituitary adenomas in adolescence. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 1998;11(04):531–541. doi: 10.1515/jpem.1998.11.4.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fideleff H L, Boquete H R, Sequera A, Suárez M, Sobrado P, Giaccio A. Peripubertal prolactinomas: clinical presentation and long-term outcome with different therapeutic approaches. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2000;13(03):261–267. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2000.13.3.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Albright A L, Pollack I F, Andelson P D. New York, NY: Thieme; 2015. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Neurosurgery. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Webb C, Prayson R A. Pediatric pituitary adenomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132(01):77–80. doi: 10.5858/2008-132-77-PPA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Oliveira R S, Castro Md, Antonini S R, Martinelli C E, Jr, Moreira A C, Machado H R. Surgical management of pediatric Cushing's disease: an analysis of 15 consecutive cases at a specialized neurosurgical center. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2010;54(01):17–23. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302010000100004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Styne D M, Grumbach M M, Kaplan S L, Wilson C B, Conte F A. Treatment of Cushing's disease in childhood and adolescence by transsphenoidal microadenomectomy. N Engl J Med. 1984;310(14):889–893. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198404053101405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abe T, Lüdecke D K.Transnasal surgery for prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence Surg Neurol 20025706369–378., discussion 378–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Arafah B M, Nekl K E, Gold R S, Selman W R. Dynamics of prolactin secretion in patients with hypopituitarism and pituitary macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(12):3507–3512. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.12.8530591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Barkan A L, Chandler W F.Giant pituitary prolactinoma with falsely low serum prolactin: the pitfall of the “high-dose hook effect”: case report Neurosurgery 19984204913–915., discussion 915–916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Comtois R, Robert F, Hardy J. Immunoradiometric assays may miss high prolactin levels. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(02):173. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-2-199307150-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fleseriu M, Lee M, Pineyro M M et al. Giant invasive pituitary prolactinoma with falsely low serum prolactin: the significance of ‘hook effect’. J Neurooncol. 2006;79(01):41–43. doi: 10.1007/s11060-005-9108-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Frieze T W, Mong D P, Koops M K. “Hook effect” in prolactinomas: case report and review of literature. Endocr Pract. 2002;8(04):296–303. doi: 10.4158/EP.8.4.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chapman I M, Hartman M L, Straume M, Johnson M L, Veldhuis J D, Thorner M O. Enhanced sensitivity growth hormone (GH) chemiluminescence assay reveals lower postglucose nadir GH concentrations in men than women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(06):1312–1319. doi: 10.1210/jcem.78.6.8200931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Iranmanesh A, Grisso B, Veldhuis J D. Low basal and persistent pulsatile growth hormone secretion are revealed in normal and hyposomatotropic men studied with a new ultrasensitive chemiluminescence assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(03):526–535. doi: 10.1210/jcem.78.3.8126122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ribeiro-Oliveira A, Jr, Barkan A. The changing face of acromegaly--advances in diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(10):605–611. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stoffel-Wagner B, Springer W, Bidlingmaier F, Klingmüller D. A comparison of different methods for diagnosing acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1997;46(05):531–537. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.1430983.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Carmichael J D, Bonert V S, Mirocha J M, Melmed S. The utility of oral glucose tolerance testing for diagnosis and assessment of treatment outcomes in 166 patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(02):523–527. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Katznelson L, Bogan J S, Trob J R et al. Biochemical assessment of Cushing's disease in patients with corticotroph macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(05):1619–1623. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.5.4845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Newell-Price J, Trainer P, Besser M, Grossman A. The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome and pseudo-Cushing's states. Endocr Rev. 1998;19(05):647–672. doi: 10.1210/edrv.19.5.0346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Woo Y S, Isidori A M, Wat W Z et al. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of adrenocorticotropin-secreting macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(08):4963–4969. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Grossman A B, Howlett T A, Perry L et al. CRF in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: a comparison with the dexamethasone suppression test. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1988;29(02):167–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1988.tb00258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dickstein G, DeBold C R, Gaitan D et al. Plasma corticotropin and cortisol responses to ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), arginine vasopressin (AVP), CRH plus AVP, and CRH plus metyrapone in patients with Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(08):2934–2941. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.8.8768855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Orth D N, DeBold C R, DeCherney G S et al. Pituitary microadenomas causing Cushing's disease respond to corticotropin-releasing factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982;55(05):1017–1019. doi: 10.1210/jcem-55-5-1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kaltsas G A, Giannulis M G, Newell-Price J D et al. A critical analysis of the value of simultaneous inferior petrosal sinus sampling in Cushing's disease and the occult ectopic adrenocorticotropin syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(02):487–492. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.2.5437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Oldfield E H, Doppman J L, Nieman L K et al. Petrosal sinus sampling with and without corticotropin-releasing hormone for the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(13):897–905. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109263251301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gandhi C D, Meyer S A, Patel A B, Johnson D M, Post K D. Neurologic complications of inferior petrosal sinus sampling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(04):760–765. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lefournier V, Gatta B, Martinie M et al. One transient neurological complication (sixth nerve palsy) in 166 consecutive inferior petrosal sinus samplings for the etiological diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(09):3401–3402. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.9.6011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Miller D L, Doppman J L, Peterman S B, Nieman L K, Oldfield E H, Chang R. Neurologic complications of petrosal sinus sampling. Radiology. 1992;185(01):143–147. doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.1.1523298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.López J, Barceló B, Lucas T et al. Petrosal sinus sampling for diagnosis of Cushing's disease: evidence of false negative results. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1996;45(02):147–156. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.d01-1550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tabarin A, Greselle J F, San-Galli F et al. Usefulness of the corticotropin-releasing hormone test during bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling for the diagnosis of Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73(01):53–59. doi: 10.1210/jcem-73-1-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tien R D, Kucharczyk J, Bessette J, Middleton M. MR imaging of the pituitary gland in infants and children: changes in size, shape, and MR signal with growth and development. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158(05):1151–1154. doi: 10.2214/ajr.158.5.1566682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yousem D M, Grossman R I. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby/Elsevier; 2010. Neuroradiology: The Requisites. 3rd ed. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Batista D, Courkoutsakis N A, Oldfield E H et al. Detection of adrenocorticotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas by magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents with cushing disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(09):5134–5140. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yousem D M, Arrington J A, Zinreich S J, Kumar A J, Bryan R N.Pituitary adenomas: possible role of bromocriptine in intratumoral hemorrhage Radiology 1989170(1 Pt 1):239–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zimmerman R A. Imaging of intrasellar, suprasellar, and parasellar tumors. Semin Roentgenol. 1990;25(02):174–197. doi: 10.1016/0037-198x(90)90048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Casanueva F F, Molitch M E, Schlechte J A et al. Guidelines of the Pituitary Society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;65(02):265–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.dos Santos Nunes V, El Dib R, Boguszewski C L, Nogueira C R. Cabergoline versus bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis. Pituitary. 2011;14(03):259–265. doi: 10.1007/s11102-010-0290-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Molitch M E, Elton R L, Blackwell R E et al. Bromocriptine as primary therapy for prolactin-secreting macroadenomas: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;60(04):698–705. doi: 10.1210/jcem-60-4-698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Webster J, Piscitelli G, Polli A, Ferrari C I, Ismail I, Scanlon M F; Cabergoline Comparative Study Group.A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea N Engl J Med 199433114904–909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.De Bellis A, Colao A, Savoia A et al. Effect of long-term cabergoline therapy on the immunological pattern and pituitary function of patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia positive for antipituitary antibodies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008;69(02):285–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Perry A, Graffeo C S, Copeland W R, III et al. Delayed Cerebrospinal Fluid rhinorrhea after gamma knife radiosurgery with or without preceding transsphenoidal resection for pituitary pathology. World Neurosurg. 2017;100:201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Schlechte J A, Sherman B M, Chapler F K, VanGilder J. Long term follow-up of women with surgically treated prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;62(06):1296–1301. doi: 10.1210/jcem-62-6-1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Molitch M E.Management of prolactinomas during pregnancy J Reprod Med 199944(12, Suppl)1121–1126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Molitch M E. Pregnancy and the hyperprolactinemic woman. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(21):1364–1370. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198505233122106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Schlechte J A. Clinical practice. Prolactinoma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(21):2035–2041. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp025334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Skrabanek P, McDonald D, Meagher D et al. Clinical course and outcome of thirty-five pregnancies in infertile hyperprolactinemic women. Fertil Steril. 1980;33(04):391–395. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44655-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Weiss M H. Medical and surgical management of functional pituitary tumors. Clin Neurosurg. 1981;28:374–383. doi: 10.1093/neurosurgery/28.cn_suppl_1.374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Colao A, Di Sarno A, Cappabianca P, Di Somma C, Pivonello R, Lombardi G. Withdrawal of long-term cabergoline therapy for tumoral and nontumoral hyperprolactinemia. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(21):2023–2033. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Johnston D G, Hall K, Kendall-Taylor P, Patrick D, Watson M, Cook D B.Effect of dopamine agonist withdrawal after long-term therapy in prolactinomas. Studies with high-definition computerised tomography Lancet 19842(8396):187–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Liuzzi A, Dallabonzana D, Oppizzi G et al. Low doses of dopamine agonists in the long-term treatment of macroprolactinomas. N Engl J Med. 1985;313(11):656–659. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198509123131103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.van 't Verlaat J W, Croughs R J. Withdrawal of bromocriptine after long-term therapy for macroprolactinomas; effect on plasma prolactin and tumour size. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1991;34(03):175–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1991.tb00289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Wang C, Lam K S, Ma J T, Chan T, Liu M Y, Yeung R T. Long-term treatment of hyperprolactinaemia with bromocriptine: effect of drug withdrawal. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1987;27(03):363–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb01163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Warfield A, Finkel D M, Schatz N J, Savino P J, Snyder P J. Bromocriptine treatment of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas may restore pituitary function. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101(06):783–785. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-6-783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wu Z R, Zhang Y, Cai L et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of invasive giant prolactinomas after a mean ten-year followup. Int J Endocrinol. 2016;2016:8.58075E6. doi: 10.1155/2016/8580750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zárate A, Canales E S, Cano C, Pilonieta C J. Follow-up of patients with prolactinomas after discontinuation of long-term therapy with bromocriptine. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1983;104(02):139–142. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1040139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Orrego J J, Chandler W F, Barkan A L. Pergolide as primary therapy for macroprolactinomas. Pituitary. 2000;3(04):251–256. doi: 10.1023/a:1012836331506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Webster J. Cabergoline and quinagolide therapy for prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2000;53(05):549–550. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.01147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Webster J. A comparative review of the tolerability profiles of dopamine agonists in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia and inhibition of lactation. Drug Saf. 1996;14(04):228–238. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199614040-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Amar A P, Couldwell W T, Chen J C, Weiss M H. Predictive value of serum prolactin levels measured immediately after transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(02):307–314. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Tyrrell J B, Lamborn K R, Hannegan L T, Applebury C B, Wilson C B.Transsphenoidal microsurgical therapy of prolactinomas: initial outcomes and long-term results Neurosurgery 19994402254–261., discussion 261–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Thorner M O. Prolactinoma. West J Med. 1983;139(05):703–705. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Vance M L, Thorner M O. Prolactinomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1987;16(03):731–753. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Bevan J S, Webster J, Burke C W, Scanlon M F. Dopamine agonists and pituitary tumor shrinkage. Endocr Rev. 1992;13(02):220–240. doi: 10.1210/edrv-13-2-220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Abe T, Lüdecke D K. Effects of preoperative octreotide treatment on different subtypes of 90 GH-secreting pituitary adenomas and outcome in one surgical centre. Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;145(02):137–145. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1450137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Fleseriu M, Hoffman A R, Katznelson L; AACE Neuroendocrine and Pituitary Scientific Committee.Pituitary scientific C: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Disease State clinical review: management of acromegaly patients: what is the role of pre-operative medical therapy? Endocr Pract 20152106668–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Katznelson L, Atkinson J L, Cook D M, Ezzat S Z, Hamrahian A H, Miller K K; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly—2011 update Endocr Pract 201117041–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Carlsen S M, Lund-Johansen M, Schreiner T et al. Preoperative octreotide treatment in newly diagnosed acromegalic patients with macroadenomas increases cure short-term postoperative rates: a prospective, randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(08):2984–2990. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Losa M, Mortini P, Urbaz L, Ribotto P, Castrignanó T, Giovanelli M. Presurgical treatment with somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly: effects on the remission and complication rates. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(06):899–906. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.6.899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Mao Z G, Zhu Y H, Tang H L et al. Preoperative lanreotide treatment in acromegalic patients with macroadenomas increases short-term postoperative cure rates: a prospective, randomised trial. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;162(04):661–666. doi: 10.1530/EJE-09-0908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Laws E R, Scheithauer B W, Groover R V. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. Prog Exp Tumor Res. 1987;30:359–361. doi: 10.1159/000413694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Tarapore P E, Sughrue M E, Blevins L, Auguste K I, Gupta N, Kunwar S. Microscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary adenomectomy in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;7(05):501–509. doi: 10.3171/2011.2.PEDS10278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Fujioka M, Young L W. The sphenoidal sinuses: radiographic patterns of normal development and abnormal findings in infants and children. Radiology. 1978;129(01):133. doi: 10.1148/129.1.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Jang Y J, Kim S C. Pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus in children evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Rhinol. 2000;14(03):181–185. doi: 10.2500/105065800782102771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Szolar D, Preidler K, Ranner G et al. Magnetic resonance assessment of age-related development of the sphenoid sinus. Br J Radiol. 1994;67(797):431–435. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-797-431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Locatelli D, Massimi L, Rigante M et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for sellar tumors in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74(11):1298–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Banu M A, Rathman A, Patel K Set al. Corridor-based endonasal endoscopic surgery for pediatric skull base pathology with detailed radioanatomic measurements Neurosurgery 20141002273–293., discussion 293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Tatreau J R, Patel M R, Shah R N et al. Anatomical considerations for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in pediatric patients. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(09):1730–1737. doi: 10.1002/lary.20964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Shah R N, Surowitz J B, Patel M R et al. Endoscopic pedicled nasoseptal flap reconstruction for pediatric skull base defects. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(06):1067–1075. doi: 10.1002/lary.20216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Kanter A S, Diallo A O, Jane J A, Jret al. Single-center experience with pediatric Cushing's disease J Neurosurg 2005103(5, Suppl)413–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Berker M, Hazer D B, Yücel T et al. Complications of endoscopic surgery of the pituitary adenomas: analysis of 570 patients and review of the literature. Pituitary. 2012;15(03):288–300. doi: 10.1007/s11102-011-0368-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Bokhari A R, Davies M A, Diamond T. Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a single surgeon experience and the learning curve. Br J Neurosurg. 2013;27(01):44–49. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2012.709554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Cappabianca P, Alfieri A, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the sella: towards functional endoscopic pituitary surgery (FEPS) Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1998;41(02):66–73. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Charalampaki P, Ayyad A, Kockro R A, Perneczky A. Surgical complications after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16(06):786–789. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Halvorsen H, Ramm-Pettersen J, Josefsen R et al. Surgical complications after transsphenoidal microscopic and endoscopic surgery for pituitary adenoma: a consecutive series of 506 procedures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156(03):441–449. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1959-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Kassam A B, Prevedello D M, Carrau R L et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(06):1544–1568. doi: 10.3171/2010.10.JNS09406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Prevedello D M, Doglietto F, Jane J A, Jr, Jagannathan J, Han J, Laws E R., Jr History of endoscopic skull base surgery: its evolution and current reality. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(01):206–213. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/07/0206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Yano S, Hide T, Shinojima N. Efficacy and complications of endoscopic skull base surgery for giant pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg. 2017;99:533–542. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Bastos R V, Silva C M, Tagliarini J V et al. Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in the treatment of pituitary tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60(05):411–419. doi: 10.1590/2359-3997000000204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Cho D Y, Liau W R.Comparison of endonasal endoscopic surgery and sublabial microsurgery for prolactinomas Surg Neurol 20025806371–375., discussion 375–376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Enseñat J, Quesada J L, Aparicio Jet al. Comparación del abordje transesfenoidal microquirúrgico frente al abordaje endonasal transesfenoidal endosócpico. Estudio prospectivo de 50 pacientes Neurocirugia (Astur) 20092004335–344., discussion 344–345 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Jain A K, Gupta A K, Pathak A, Bhansali A, Bapuraj J R. Excision of pituitary adenomas: randomized comparison of surgical modalities. Br J Neurosurg. 2007;21(04):328–331. doi: 10.1080/02688690701395447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Kahilogullari G, Beton S, Al-Beyati E S et al. Olfactory functions after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: endoscopic versus microscopic approach. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(09):2112–2119. doi: 10.1002/lary.24037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Little A S, Chapple K, Jahnke H, White W L. Comparative inpatient resource utilization for patients undergoing endoscopic or microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(01):84–90. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.JNS132095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Storr H L, Drake W M, Evanson J et al. Endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: early experience and outcome in paediatric Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2014;80(02):270–276. doi: 10.1111/cen.12275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Massimi L, Rigante M, D'Angelo L et al. Quality of postoperative course in children: endoscopic endonasal surgery versus sublabial microsurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153(04):843–849. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0929-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Rigante M, Massimi L, Parrilla C et al. Endoscopic transsphenoidal approach versus microscopic approach in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(09):1132–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Chivukula S, Koutourousiou M, Snyderman C H, Fernandez-Miranda J C, Gardner P A, Tyler-Kabara E C. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;11(03):227–241. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.PEDS12160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Zhan R, Xu G, Wiebe T M, Li X. Surgical outcomes of the endoscopic transsphenoidal route to pituitary tumours in paediatric patients >10 years of age: 5 years of experience at a single institute. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(08):774–778. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Snyderman C H, Pant H, Carrau R L, Prevedello D, Gardner P, Kassam A B. What are the limits of endoscopic sinus surgery?: the expanded endonasal approach to the skull base. Keio J Med. 2009;58(03):152–160. doi: 10.2302/kjm.58.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.AlQahtani A, Turri-Zanoni M, Dallan I, Battaglia P, Castelnuovo P. Endoscopic endonasal resection of sinonasal and skull base malignancies in children: feasibility and outcomes. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28(11):1905–1910. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-1866-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.D'Haens J, Van Rompaey K, Stadnik T, Haentjens P, Poppe K, Velkeniers B. Fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for functioning pituitary adenomas: a retrospective comparison with traditional transsphenoidal microsurgery in the same institution. Surg Neurol. 2009;72(04):336–340. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Dehdashti A R, Ganna A, Karabatsou K, Gentili F.Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series Neurosurgery 200862051006–1015., discussion 1015–1017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Graffeo C S, Dietrich A R, Grobelny B et al. A panoramic view of the skull base: systematic review of open and endoscopic endonasal approaches to four tumors. Pituitary. 2014;17(04):349–356. doi: 10.1007/s11102-013-0508-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Higgins T S, Courtemanche C, Karakla D et al. Analysis of transnasal endoscopic versus transseptal microscopic approach for excision of pituitary tumors. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(06):649–652. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.O'Malley B W, Jr, Grady M S, Gabel B C et al. Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas: single-surgeon experience and the learning curve. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25(06):E10. doi: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.12.E10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Buchfelder M, Kreutzer J. Transcranial surgery for pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2008;11(04):375–384. doi: 10.1007/s11102-008-0120-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Dolenc V V.Transcranial epidural approach to pituitary tumors extending beyond the sella Neurosurgery 19974103542–550., discussion 551–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Couldwell W T.Transsphenoidal and transcranial surgery for pituitary adenomas J Neurooncol 200469(1-3):237–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Jane J A, Park T S, Pobereskin L H, Winn H R, Butler A B. The supraorbital approach: technical note. Neurosurgery. 1982;11(04):537–542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Iwai Y, Hakuba A, Katsuyama J et al. A case of ectopic large pituitary adenoma. No Shinkei Geka. 1990;18(01):71–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Ohata K, Takami T, Goto T, Hara M. Transpetrosal look-up approach for retrochiasmatic suprasellar tumors. Skull Base. 2005;15:B-9. [Google Scholar]
  • 163.DeLellis R A. Lyon, France: IARC; 2004. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Endocrine Organs. vol 8. [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Figarella-Branger D, Trouillas J. The new WHO classification of human pituitary tumors: comments. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;111(01):71–72. doi: 10.1007/s00401-005-1099-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Saeger W, Honegger J, Theodoropoulou M et al. Clinical impact of the current WHO classification of pituitary adenomas. Endocr Pathol. 2016;27(02):104–114. doi: 10.1007/s12022-016-9418-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Scheithauer B W, Gaffey T A, Lloyd R Vet al. Pathobiology of pituitary adenomas and carcinomas Neurosurgery 20065902341–353., discussion 341–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.George D H, Scheithauer B W, Kovacs K et al. Crooke's cell adenoma of the pituitary: an aggressive variant of corticotroph adenoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(10):1330–1336. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200310000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Pernicone P J, Scheithauer B W, Sebo T J et al. Pituitary carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 15 cases. Cancer. 1997;79(04):804–812. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970215)79:4<804::aid-cncr18>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Thapar K, Yamada Y, Scheithauer B, Kovacs K, Yamada S, Stefaneanu L. Assessment of mitotic activity in pituitary adenomas and carcinomas. Endocr Pathol. 1996;7(03):215–221. doi: 10.1007/BF02739924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Di Ieva A, Rotondo F, Syro L V, Cusimano M D, Kovacs K. Aggressive pituitary adenomas--diagnosis and emerging treatments. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(07):423–435. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Zada G, Woodmansee W W, Ramkissoon S, Amadio J, Nose V, Laws E R., Jr Atypical pituitary adenomas: incidence, clinical characteristics, and implications. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(02):336–344. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS10290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Ram Z, Nieman L K, Cutler G B, Jr, Chrousos G P, Doppman J L, Oldfield E H. Early repeat surgery for persistent Cushing's disease. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(01):37–45. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.1.0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Landolt A M, Haller D, Lomax N et al. Octreotide may act as a radioprotective agent in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(03):1287–1289. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.3.6464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Landolt A M, Haller D, Lomax N et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent surgically treated acromegaly: comparison with fractionated radiotherapy. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(06):1002–1008. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.6.1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Pollock B E, Nippoldt T B, Stafford S L, Foote R L, Abboud C F. Results of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: factors associated with endocrine normalization. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(03):525–530. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.3.0525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Goffman T E, Dewan R, Arakaki R, Gorden P, Oldfield E H, Glatstein E. Persistent or recurrent acromegaly. Long-term endocrinologic efficacy and neurologic safety of postsurgical radiation therapy. Cancer. 1992;69(01):271–275. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920101)69:1<271::aid-cncr2820690145>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Pollock B E, Carpenter P C.Stereotactic radiosurgery as an alternative to fractionated radiotherapy for patients with recurrent or residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas Neurosurgery 200353051086–1091., discussion 1091–1094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Rutkowski M J, Flanigan P M, Aghi M K. Update on the management of recurrent Cushing's disease. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(02):E16. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.FOCUS14703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Sheehan J M, Vance M L, Sheehan J P, Ellegala D B, Laws E R., Jr Radiosurgery for Cushing's disease after failed transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(05):738–742. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.5.0738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Sheehan J P, Kondziolka D, Flickinger J, Lunsford L D.Radiosurgery for residual or recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma J Neurosurg 200297(5, Suppl):408–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Loeffler J S, Shih H A. Radiation therapy in the management of pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(07):1992–2003. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Sheehan J P, Xu Z, Lobo M J. External beam radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2012;23(04):571–586. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2012.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Thorén M, Rähn T, Hallengren B et al. Treatment of Cushing's disease in childhood and adolescence by stereotactic pituitary irradiation. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1986;75(03):388–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1986.tb10219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Devoe D J, Miller W L, Conte F A et al. Long-term outcome in children and adolescents after transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(10):3196–3202. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.10.4290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Magiakou M A, Mastorakos G, Oldfield E H, Gomez M T, Doppman J L, Cutler G B, Jr et al. Cushing's Syndrome in Children and Adolescents–Presentation, Diagnosis, and Therapy. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:629–636. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199409083311002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Ding D, Starke R M, Sheehan J P. Treatment paradigms for pituitary adenomas: defining the roles of radiosurgery and radiation therapy. J Neurooncol. 2014;117(03):445–457. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1262-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Estrada J, Boronat M, Mielgo M et al. The long-term outcome of pituitary irradiation after unsuccessful transsphenoidal surgery in Cushing's disease. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(03):172–177. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701163360303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Jennings A S, Liddle G W, Orth D N. Results of treating childhood Cushing's disease with pituitary irradiation. N Engl J Med. 1977;297(18):957–962. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197711032971801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Petit J H, Biller B M, Yock T I et al. Proton stereotactic radiotherapy for persistent adrenocorticotropin-producing adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(02):393–399. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Ronson B B, Schulte R W, Han K P, Loredo L N, Slater J M, Slater J D. Fractionated proton beam irradiation of pituitary adenomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(02):425–434. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Graffeo C S, Perry A, Carlstrom L P et al. Characterizing and predicting the Nelson-Salassa syndrome. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(06):1277–1287. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Pollock B E, Young W F., Jr Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with ACTH-producing pituitary adenomas after prior adrenalectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54(03):839–841. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02975-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Heaney A P. Clinical review: Pituitary carcinoma: difficult diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):3649–3660. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Losa M, Bogazzi F, Cannavo S et al. Temozolomide therapy in patients with aggressive pituitary adenomas or carcinomas. J Neurooncol. 2016;126(03):519–525. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1991-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.McCormack A I, Wass J A, Grossman A B. Aggressive pituitary tumours: the role of temozolomide and the assessment of MGMT status. Eur J Clin Invest. 2011;41(10):1133–1148. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02520.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Ortiz L D, Syro L V, Scheithauer B W et al. Temozolomide in aggressive pituitary adenomas and carcinomas. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2012;67 01:119–123. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(Sup01)20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Raverot G, Castinetti F, Jouanneau E et al. Pituitary carcinomas and aggressive pituitary tumours: merits and pitfalls of temozolomide treatment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2012;76(06):769–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Fukuoka H, Cooper O, Ben-Shlomo A et al. EGFR as a therapeutic target for human, canine, and mouse ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(12):4712–4721. doi: 10.1172/JCI60417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Fukuoka H, Cooper O, Mizutani J et al. HER2/ErbB2 receptor signaling in rat and human prolactinoma cells: strategy for targeted prolactinoma therapy. Mol Endocrinol. 2011;25(01):92–103. doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Jouanneau E, Wierinckx A, Ducray F et al. New targeted therapies in pituitary carcinoma resistant to temozolomide. Pituitary. 2012;15(01):37–43. doi: 10.1007/s11102-011-0341-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Ortiz L D, Syro L V, Scheithauer B W et al. Anti-VEGF therapy in pituitary carcinoma. Pituitary. 2012;15(03):445–449. doi: 10.1007/s11102-011-0346-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Katznelson L, Klibanski A. Prolactinomas. Cancer Treat Res. 1997;89:41–55. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6355-6_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Rasmussen C. Hyperprolactinaemia--a clinical study with special reference to long-term follow-up, treatment with dopamine agonists, and pregnancy. Ups J Med Sci. 1990;95(01):1–29. doi: 10.3109/03009739009178573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Rasmussen C, Bergh T, Nillius S J, Wide L. Return of menstruation and normalization of prolactin in hyperprolactinemic women with bromocriptine-induced pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1985;44(01):31–34. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48673-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Gsponer J, De Tribolet N, Déruaz J P et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of pituitary tumors and other abnormal intrasellar masses. Retrospective analysis of 353 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 1999;78(04):236–269. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199907000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Hoorn E J, Zietse R. Water balance disorders after neurosurgery: the triphasic response revisited. NDT Plus. 2010;3(01):42–44. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfp117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Das N K, Lyngdoh B T, Bhakri B Ket al. Surgical management of pediatric Cushing's disease Surg Neurol 20076703251–257., discussion 257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Kassam A, Thomas A J, Snyderman Cet al. Fully endoscopic expanded endonasal approach treating skull base lesions in pediatric patients J Neurosurg 20071062, Suppl):75–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Tamasauskas A, Sinkūnas K, Draf W et al. Management of cerebrospinal fluid leak after surgical removal of pituitary adenomas. Medicina (Kaunas) 2008;44(04):302–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Garcia-Navarro V, Anand V K, Schwartz T H. Gasket seal closure for extended endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery: efficacy in a large case series. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(05):563–568. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Kassam A B, Thomas A, Carrau R Let al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap Neurosurgery 2008630101ONS44–ONS52., discussion ONS52–ONS53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Richmond I L, Wilson C B. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. J Neurosurg. 1978;49:163–168. doi: 10.3171/jns.1978.49.2.0163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder M, Muller O A. Transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. J R Soc Med. 1986;79:262–269. doi: 10.1177/014107688607900504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Lüdecke D, Herrmann H-D, Schulte F.Special problems with neurosurgical treatment of hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in childrenIn:New York, NY: Karger Publishers; 1987362–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Haddad S F, VanGilder J C, Menezes A H. Pediatric pituitary tumors. Neurosurgery. 1991;29:509–514. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199110000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Leinung M C, Kane L A, Scheithauer B W, Carpenter P C, Laws E R, Jr., Zimmerman D. Long term follow-up of transsphenoidal surgery for the treatment of Cushing's disease in childhood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:2475–2479. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.8.7629245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Abe T, Ludecke D K, Saeger W.Clinically nonsecreting pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence Neurosurgery 199842744–750.; discussion 750–741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES