Abstract
Colloidal lead halide perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) have recently emerged as a novel class of bright emitters with pure colors spanning the entire visible spectral range. Contrary to conventional quantum dots, such as CdSe and InP NCs, perovskite NCs feature unusual, defect-tolerant photophysics. Specifically, surface dangling bonds and intrinsic point defects such as vacancies do not form midgap states, known to trap carriers and thereby quench photoluminescence (PL). Accordingly, perovskite NCs need not be electronically surface-passivated (with, for instance, ligands and wider-gap materials) and do not noticeably suffer from photo-oxidation. Novel opportunities for their preparation therefore can be envisaged. Herein, we show that the infiltration of perovskite precursor solutions into the pores of mesoporous silica, followed by drying, leads to the template-assisted formation of perovskite NCs. The most striking outcome of this simple methodology is very bright PL with quantum efficiencies exceeding 50%. This facile strategy can be applied to a large variety of perovskite compounds, hybrid and fully inorganic, with the general formula APbX3, where A is cesium (Cs), methylammonium (MA), or formamidinium (FA), and X is Cl, Br, I or a mixture thereof. The luminescent properties of the resulting templated NCs can be tuned by both quantum size effects as well as composition. Also exhibiting intrinsic haze due to scattering within the composite, such materials may find applications as replacements for conventional phosphors in liquid-crystal television display technologies and in related luminescence down-conversion-based devices.
Keywords: perovskites, lead halides, defects, mesoporous, luminescence, nanocrystals
Colloidal cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals (CsPbX3 NCs, X = Cl, Br, or I) have been recently shown to possess outstanding optical properties such as bright photoluminescence (PL, QY = 50–90%) within a wide color gamut.1 Recent reports have concerned various aspects of both the photophysics (stimulated emission and lasing,2−7 light-emitting devices,8−14 and single-dot spectroscopy15−20) and chemistry (unconventional reactivity such as postsynthetic anion exchange,21−24 X-ray lithography,25 shape-engineering,26−30 up-scaling and further variations of the synthesis,29,31−33 surface chemistry,34−37 and self-assembly38) of CsPbX3 nanostructures. Considerable attention has also been devoted to hybrid perovskites–methylammonium lead halides (MAPbX3) and related compositions, in the form of colloidal and noncolloidal nanomaterials.39−53 A frequently reported feature of nanoscale perovskites is their outstanding PL. On the contrary, achieving bright PL with conventional semiconductor NCs, such as CdSe, InAs, or InP, requires electronic passivation with epitaxial layers of wider-gap semiconductors.54−56 The bright PL of nanosized perovskites coincides with other phenomenal characteristics, especially outstanding photovoltaic performance characterized by power conversion efficiencies exceeding 22%.57−60 Other studies point to a very low density of carriers (109–1011 cm–3)61−64 and low densities of traps (109–1010 cm–3),62 as well as high carrier mobilities (25–100 cm2 V–1 s–1).61,65 All of these outstanding electronic and optical characteristics are highly surprising in light of the high structural disorder present in such materials, as exemplified by a high density of vacancies (up to 1% of Schottky defects),66 unusual ionic rotations,67−69 and high ionic mobilities.70−72 Normally, structural defects in semiconductors lead to a high density of corresponding defect states inside the energy bandgap, acting as trapping states.
The rare situation wherein intrinsic defects do not act as electronic trap states—so-called defect-tolerance65,73−80—is interesting theoretically and may find numerous practical applications. For methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3), by far the most studied lead halide perovskite compound, the defect-tolerance of its electronic structure has been rationalized by Brandt et al.73 The valence band of MAPbI3 closely resembles that of idealized defect-tolerant character (Figure 1a,b). Specifically, the maximum of the valence band is formed by the antibonding orbitals, arising from hybridization between the Pb(6s) and I(5p) orbitals. The bottom of the conduction band in MAPbI3 does not meet the optimal bonding character as depicted in Figure 1a; however, strong spin–orbit effects that broaden the band play a highly beneficial role instead. This broadening shifts the bottom of the conduction band to below the Pb(6p) atomic orbital and increases the likelihood that halide vacancies will form intraconduction band states. Thus, defects formed upon the creation of vacancies or interstitial atoms will likely appear as resonances inside the bands. Based on these considerations, surface states are also not likely to form intragap states. Correspondingly, surface ligands and other means of electronic surface passivation such as epitaxial overgrowth with protective shells are not strictly required to ensure the cleanliness of the energy bandgap and, hence, the bright PL. This explains the previously observed bright PL of MAPbBr3 particles precipitated on porous alumina.81,82 From a practical viewpoint, numerous simple synthesis methods thus can be envisaged for the production of nanocrystalline, highly luminescent perovskite NCs.
Herein, we present an investigation of the growth of perovskite NCs using mesoporous silica (meso-SiO2) matrixes as templates, showing that this can serve as a facile, complementary, noncolloidal, and ligand-free preparation route. The major finding is that this simple route allows outstanding PL, with an emission peak broadly tunable in the green to near-infrared, narrow emission line widths down to 22 nm in the green (520–530 nm) and 36 nm in the red (650–660 nm) and high quantum yields (QY) of above 50%. We note that the mesoscale templating of semiconducting NCs, especially II–VI and III–V compounds, has been well documented over the last two decades83−89 using either solution-phase or gas-phase impregnation strategies. However, bright emission from such templated conventional semiconductors was not achieved, due to the quenching effect as a result of numerous midgap states as discussed above. On the contrary, we demonstrate herein that bright PL can be achieved from perovskite NCs crystallized within the pores of mesoporous silica due to their unique defect-tolerant character.
Highly concentrated solutions of the precursor salts, AX and PbX2, were inserted into the pores (of width 2.5–50 nm) of various commercially available mesoporous silica templates, exhibiting hexagonally ordered one-dimensional channels (2.5–7 nm pore widths), interconnected cubically ordered cavities (3 nm), or disordered pore networks (15–50 nm pore widths) of a specific characteristic size. These matrixes were chosen among those readily available from common vendors and, after vacuum drying, were used as received. The smaller pore (<10 nm) templates exhibit periodically arranged, well-defined pores as a result of well-known surfactant-templated, sol-gel synthesis techniques. The larger pore silica templates employed in this work are mass produced by suppliers such as W. R. Grace & Co. and have irregular pore morphologies of a specific characteristic pore size. Specifically, the following discussion refers to samples abbreviated as 50 nm-SiO2 (irregular shaped, 0.5–2 μm particles with 50 nm average pores), 30 nm-SiO2 (irregular shaped, 20 μm particles with 30 nm pores), 15 nm-SiO2 (irregular shaped, 35–75 μm particles with 30 nm pores), 7 nm-SiO2 (elongated 0.5–1 μm particles with hexagonally ordered 1D-channels of 7 nm in diameter; also known as MSU-H mesophase), 4 nm-SiO2 (200 nm spherical particles, with hexagonally ordered 1D-channels of 4 nm in diameter; also known as SBA-15 mesophase), 3 nm-SiO2 (<150 μm particles, with cubically ordered channels forming larger cavities at connection points, pore size is ∼3 nm; also known as MCM-48 mesophase), and 2.5 nm-SiO2 (0.2–0.5 μm particles with hexagonally 1D-channels of 2.5 nm in diameter; also known as MCM-41 mesophase). The dry meso-SiO2 was impregnated by a concentrated precursor solution (preheated to ∼50 °C) in excess with respect to the pore volume of the template. The mixture was stirred in inert atmosphere and impregnation was allowed to occur for 10 min at room temperature. Excess solution was then removed by damping with filter paper or by gentle vacuum filtration, thereby preventing the formation of perovskite crystals outside the pores. Finally, samples were dried under vacuum at 120 °C for CH3NH3PbX3 and CH(NH2)2PbX3 or at 150 °C for CsPbX3. During drying, the impregnated silica powder was placed between two glass cover slides in order to ensure uniform heat distribution and therefore more uniform drying (see further synthesis details in the Supporting Information and in Figure S1).
A structural analysis of several samples of meso-SiO2 (of pore sizes 7, 4, and 2.5 nm) impregnated with CsPbI3 or MAPbI3 is presented in Figure 2. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) in secondary electron (SE) imaging mode of CsPbI3 within 7 nm-SiO2 (MSU-H) shows its ordered mesoporous structure consisting of one-dimensional channels separated by ∼2.2 nm thick walls (Figure 2a). Imaging in high-angle annular dark field mode (HAADF-STEM) and area-selective energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) clearly illustrate partial filling of the pores with CsPbI3 (Figure 2b–d). Exposure to the electron beam often leads to the fragmentation of the NCs (Figure 2n–o). X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of all samples of perovskite phases grown in meso-SiO2 matrixes confirm that they consist of silica and the perovskite phase in NC form (exemplified by CH3NH3PbI3 NCs within 4 nm-SiO2 as shown in Figure 2p). The XRD reflections corresponding to the perovskite phase are significantly broadened due to the finite grain size effect. Impurities in the form of extra-pore, large-grain perovskite crystals can also be detected by HAADF-STEM and EDXS techniques (Figure S2).
Difficulties in the synthesis of CsPbX3 and MAPbX3 NCs smaller than 7–8 nm and the resulting instability of such NCs are well reported topics.2,46 The template-assisted preparation of such NCs is thus a unique route to such strongly quantum-confined systems. One of the tested templates herein, 4 nm-SiO2 (SBA-15), has a regular spherical grain morphology and grain size (200 nm, Figure 2e) and can be handled as a colloidal suspension. In particular, small CsPbI3 NCs can be rather homogeneously distributed within its porous structure throughout the entire particle (see Figure 2f–i). Even the smallest pore template, 2.5 nm-SiO2 (MCM-41), can be successfully impregnated with CsPbI3 NCs as shown in Figure 2j–m.
The template-synthesized NCs of all investigated perovskite compositions are luminescent and show pore-size-dependent PL spectra (Figure 3a–d, S9). NCs synthesized in 50 nm-SiO2 emit near the bandgaps of the corresponding bulk perovskites. The emission of NCs synthesized in the smallest pore template, 2.5 nm-SiO2, is 50–100 nm blue-shifted with respect to the bulk bandgap. Pure NCs of all studied compositions could be grown in the templates with characteristic pores sizes of 4 nm or above. In the case of 2.5 nm-SiO2, the coprecipitation of bulk material together with NCs was often observed for MAPbI3, CsPbBr3, and MAPbBr3. CsPbI3 NCs, as an exception, could be synthesized in purely NC morphology in the 2.5 nm-SiO2 template as well as those with larger pores.
Our previous investigations of colloidal CsPbX3 led to the development of techniques for the facile compositional engineering of the bandgap energy via the formation of mixed-halide solid-solutions.1,22 This possibility is also preserved within the meso-SiO2 template-assisted approach described herein, as demonstrated for mixed-halide CsPb(BrxI1–x)3 NCs in 7 nm-SiO2 (MSU-H) in Figure 3e. This enables the possibility of multivariant (through composition and size variation) adjustment of the PL wavelength, a strategy that can be employed to target specific emitters with very high accuracy. For example, to meet the recently introduced Rec.2020 color standard, the primary red color in next-generation television displays should optimally emit at 630 nm. In the cesium lead halide system, this wavelength can be reached either by CsPbI3 NCs grown in 4 nm-SiO2 or by CsPb(Br0.25I0.75)3 NCs grown in 7 nm-SiO2 (Figure 3f). However, such compositional bandgap tuning only works well for the I-rich system (red emitters), whereas further increasing the Br content often (although not reproducibly) leads to the partial segregation of the material into pure CsPbBr3 and I-rich mixed-halide perovskite NCs. Such a behavior is different from the colloidal synthesis of CsPb(BrxI1–x)3 NCs, where a broader range of solid-solutions can be achieved.1 The phase segregation apparent in meso-SiO2 synthesized mixed-halide NCs is likely rooted in the different solubility of these compositions in the precursor solution, occurring upon drying of the solvent (bromide perovskite NCs are generally less soluble than the corresponding iodide NCs).
The potential application of perovskite NCs in television display technologies requires high color purity. Typical full width at half-maximum (fwhm) values of the PL from perovskite NCs grown by the template-assisted methods described herein are similar to those of colloidal perovskite NCs.1 For red-emitting (∼630 nm) iodide-based or mixed iodide-bromide NCs, the fwhm is 50–55 nm. At longer wavelength PL, the fwhm is narrower (as low as 36 nm), especially for pure CsPbI3 NCs. For green-emitting bromide-based NCs, the fwhm is as small as 20–22 at 530 nm. This is narrower than that of state-of-the-art, commercial Cd-free NC emitters (exhibiting a fwhm of ∼40 nm).90−92
In the evaporation-induced crystallization of APbX3 NCs within meso-SiO2 described in this work, the selection of a solvent is as important as the selection of the matrix or composition of the solutes. For example, the PL spectra of 7 nm-SiO2-templated MAPbI3 NCs grown from a variety of organic solvents are presented in Figure 4a. The solvents exhibiting a higher solubility of perovskites, that is, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), N-methylformamide (MFA), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), lead to larger quantities of bulk perovskite deposited outside of the pores of the template, resulting in PL shoulders at longer wavelenghts. In contrast, solvents with lower solubility of the perovskites, such as propylene carbonate (PC), result in samples with narrower PL spectra. The fwhm of the PL of 7 nm-SiO2-templated MAPbI3 NCs is broader when DMF was the solvent (65 nm) than with PC (53 nm). The systematic difference in PL peak position between different solvents can be as high as 20 nm (Figure 4a), whereas standard sample-to-sample deviation is just 2–3 nm. Favorable wetting or higher solubility could explain more complete pore filling and therefore larger NC size. However, no convincing correlation between the PL maximum and either the solvent’s surface tension or with perovskite solubility could be found in samples investigated herein (Figures S4 and S5). Instead, the PL maximum correlates more evidently with the solvent’s ability to solvate cations. The dependence of the PL maximum on the ratio of the solvent’s acceptor number (AN) to donor number (DN) is shown in Figure 4b. These numbers represent Lewis acidity and basicity, respectively. Solvents with a higher AN/DN ratio solvate MA+ cations less efficiently and increase their activity. The same effect (achieving higher MA+ activity) can be directly accomplished simply by increasing the concentration of this cation. Indeed, even more pronounced PL peak tuning can be realized when the MAI:PbI2 ratio is varied (Figure 4c).
Previous studies have shown that colloidally synthesized, ligand-capped perovskite NCs lose their colloidal stability at sizes above 15–20 nm,1,51 attributed to strong dispersive interactions leading to aggregation. On the other hand, very small NCs are too labile for isolation and purification, showing a propensity for crystal phase transitions, shape changes, and aggregation.20 Hence, there have been no systematic studies on the size-dependence of optical properties at small sizes (below 8 nm). Template-assisted synthesis, in contrast, opens this possibility in a straightforward manner. The correlation between peak values of PL spectra (Figure 3) and characteristic NC size (Figure 4d) are determined herein for MAPbI3, CsPbI3, MAPbBr3, and CsPbBr3. Significant size-dependent effects are apparent for NCs synthesized within the pores of 2.5 nm-, 4 nm-, and 7 nm-SiO2, whereas this effect is weak (e.g., in the case of MAPbI3) or absent for samples in larger pore templates.
Time-resolved PL spectra from template-synthesized CsPbBr3 NCs show a large, nonmonotonic variation of the decay rate with pore-size (Figure 5a). NCs synthesized within 7 nm-SiO2 show a significantly slower PL decay rate compared to both smaller and larger NCs. The long average lifetime of these NCs (Figure 5b) is accompanied by the highest brightness (with PL QY = 48 ± 24%) among all templated CsPbBr3 NCs. This correlation, along with an almost monoexponential PL decay, indicates that 7 nm-SiO2-templated NCs are impacted the least by nonradiative pathways of excitonic relaxation. The measured lifetimes of CsPbBr3 NCs in 7 nm-SiO2 are noticeably longer than for colloidally synthesized CsPbBr3 NCs (Figure S6). Taking into account the cylindrical pore geometry of the 7 nm-SiO2 (MSU-H) template, this finding is consistent with previously reported shape-dependent PL lifetimes of colloidal NCs, ranging from several to tens to hundreds of nanoseconds as the shape is changed from small, nearly isotropic NCs to long 1D and large 2D NCs.29 At the same time, small 2D CsPbBr3 NC platelets exhibit PL lifetimes of a few nanoseconds, similar to the small, nearly cubic NCs.28 Together, these results imply that the PL lifetime of CsPbBr3 NCs increases when quantum confinement is drastically reduced in one or two dimensions. None of the templated CsPbBr3 NC samples show a noticeable difference in PL lifetimes under varying pumping intensities in the range of 0.25 to 25 nJ·cm–2. Only at excitation intensities above 25 nJ·cm–2, faster radiative lifetimes were observed (Figure 5c). In this respect, there is again a difference between template-synthesized (elongated) and colloidally synthesized (cubic) CsPbBr3 NCs (Figure S6). Templated NCs rather resemble the behavior of colloidal MAPbBr3 nanowires51 or compact films of colloidal MAPbBr3 and CsPbBr3 NCs.2,51 The latter examples also exhibited a strong relationship between radiative lifetime and pumping intensity, which can be explained by effective exciton delocalization and the higher probability of effects of excitonic interaction (e.g., trions and multiple exciton formation) under high pump intensity within the individual nanowire. Because the number of excitons increases with pumping fluency, the relaxation becomes faster due to additional multiexciton- and charged-exciton-(trion)-related relaxation pathways with short decay times: nonradiative (Auger recombination) and radiative (coherent emission).
All template-synthesized APbX3 NCs show bright PL under UV-excitation. For the samples emitting in the visible range, in particular in green, luminescent glowing can be clearly seen by eye even in daylight. The accurate measurement of PL QY is complicated due to strong scattering in the powders (Figure 5d). The wide standard deviation is mostly reflective of measurement accuracy rather than sample-to-sample variation. Despite this fact, the measurement systematically shows that templated NCs of bromide perovskites, (CsPbBr3, FAPbBr3 and MAPbBr3) are brighter than analogous iodides (Figure 5d). This is similar to the case of colloidal lead halide perovskite NCs1 and consistent with time-resolved (TR) PL data. The average (48 ± 24%) and highest (∼90%) measured PL QYs of CsPbBr3 NCs synthesized in 7 nm-SiO2 are comparable to the PL QYs of films of colloidal CsPbBr3 NCs, where QYs of 50–60% are only achievable with a very high content of excessive ligands. Meso-SiO2-templated CsPbBr3 and hybrid perovskite NCs also retain the same high QY after 6 days of photoannealing under the UV lamp (365 nm, 400 μW/cm2). Changes in the TR PL traces were not even observed after pulsed irradiation for 30 min, which corresponds to 1010 laser shots with an intensity of 2 μJ/cm2 (Figure S7). We emphasize that such high QYs and photostabilities are obtained for unpassivated semiconductor NCs. We are not aware of any previous templated growth of bright NCs for II–VI, IV–VI, and III–V semiconductors.
The improved processability of perovskite NCs via a template-assisted strategy might be useful in numerous applications. Large silica particles are not dispersible in solvents. Some polar solvents (e.g., MFA) are able to suspend silica particles but also completely dissolve perovskite NCs. We have found that some commonly known detergents may help to disperse silica microparticles in toluene without an effect on the perovskite NCs and their PL properties. These detergents give good dispersions for all meso-SiO2 templates investigated with mean particle sizes below 2 μm, such as 2.5 nm-SiO2 (MCM-41), 4 nm-SiO2 (SBA-15), and 7 nm-SiO2 (MSU-H). Simple conformable detergents like octadecylsilane (ODS) or octadecyltrimethoxysilane (OTMS) help to partially disperse silica particles in toluene without a noticeable drop in PL brightness even after a few days. Interestingly, bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (also known as docusate or AOT) can disperse silica microparticles completely and very quickly. Such suspensions are stable toward ultrasonication and stay well dispersed for hours after sonication (Figure 6a). This permits the mixture of perovskite-impregnated silica microparticles with toluene-soluble polymers such as polystyrene and the preparation of uniform films as demonstrated in Figure 6b. Such films show bright PL and have intrinsic haze, a potentially useful attribute for applications such as backlight sources in television displays.93
In summary, the use of mesoporous silica templates allows the inexpensive and scalable preparation of lead halide perovskite NCs. Owing to the intrinsic tolerance of the electronic structure to the defects in these compounds, the resulting templated NCs exhibit an unprecedented high quality of PL. This result stands in striking contrast to conventional semiconductors (e.g., CdSe, InP, etc.) whose PL properties deteriorate upon incorporation within a porous matrix via trapping on surface defects, except when they are rigorously surface-passivated. Future work should be performed using other mesoporous matrixes, especially those which exhibit electrical conductivity (e.g., transparent conductive oxides, porous silicon, etc.), as well as other infiltration methods (such as consecutive ion absorption or from melts and vapors, due to the low melting point of most perovskites).
Acknowledgments
We thank the European Union for financial support via ERC Starting Grant 2012 (Project NANOSOLID, GA No. 306733) and a Marie Curie Fellowship (IIF-GA-2012-330524).
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02688.
Materials and synthetic details; additional TEM images; dependence of PL on solvent properties; TR PL of colloidal CsPbBr3 NCs and template-synthesized CsPbI3 NCs; PL decay stability. (PDF)
Author Contributions
(D.N.D. and L.P.) These authors contributed equally. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Protesescu L.; Yakunin S.; Bodnarchuk M. I.; Krieg F.; Caputo R.; Hendon C. H.; Yang R. X.; Walsh A.; Kovalenko M. V. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (6), 3692–3696. 10.1021/nl5048779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yakunin S.; Protesescu L.; Krieg F.; Bodnarchuk M. I.; Nedelcu G.; Humer M.; De Luca G.; Fiebig M.; Heiss W.; Kovalenko M. V. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8056. 10.1038/ncomms9056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y.; Li X.; Song J. D.; Xiao L.; Zeng H.; Sun H. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (44), 7101–7108. 10.1002/adma.201503573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu Z.; Wang K.; Sun W.; Jinakai L.; Liu S.; Song Q.; Xiao S.. Two-photon pumped lead halide perovskite nanowire lasers. 2015, arXiv:1510.03987. arXiv.org e-Print archive. http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.03987 (accessed July 2016). [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y.; Li X.; Zhao X.; Xiao L.; Zeng H.; Sun H. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (1), 448–453. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eaton S. W.; Lai M.; Gibson N. A.; Wong A. B.; Dou L.; Ma J.; Wang L.-W.; Leone S. R.; Yang P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113 (8), 1993–1998. 10.1073/pnas.1600789113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Y.; Chen Q.; Zhang C.; Wang R.; Wu H.; Zhang X.; Xing G.; Yu W. W.; Wang X.; Zhang Y.; Xiao M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (11), 3761–3768. 10.1021/jacs.5b12662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song J.; Li J.; Li X.; Xu L.; Dong Y.; Zeng H. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (44), 7162–7167. 10.1002/adma.201502567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X.; Lin H.; Huang H.; Reckmeier C.; Zhang Y.; Choy W. C. H.; Rogach A. L. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (2), 1415–1420. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X.; Wu Y.; Zhang S.; Cai B.; Gu Y.; Song J.; Zeng H. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26 (15), 2435–2445. 10.1002/adfm.201600109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li G.; Rivarola F. W. R.; Davis N. J. L. K.; Bai S.; Jellicoe T. C.; de la Peña F.; Hou S.; Ducati C.; Gao F.; Friend R. H.; Greenham N. C.; Tan Z.-K. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (18), 3528–3534. 10.1002/adma.201600064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palazon F.; Di Stasio F.; Akkerman Q. A.; Krahne R.; Prato M.; Manna L. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28 (9), 2902–2906. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X.; Xu B.; Zhang J.; Gao Y.; Zheng Y.; Wang K.; Sun X. W. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 4595. 10.1002/adfm.201600958. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sutherland B. R.; Sargent E. H. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10 (5), 295–302. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.62. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tian Y.; Merdasa A.; Peter M.; Abdellah M.; Zheng K.; Ponseca C. S.; Pullerits T.; Yartsev A.; Sundström V.; Scheblykin I. G. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (3), 1603–1608. 10.1021/nl5041397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park Y. S.; Guo S.; Makarov N. S.; Klimov V. I. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (10), 10386–10393. 10.1021/acsnano.5b04584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swarnkar A.; Chulliyil R.; Ravi V. K.; Irfanullah M.; Chowdhury A.; Nag A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (51), 15424–15428. 10.1002/anie.201508276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu F.; Zhang H.; Sun C.; Yin C.; Lv B.; Zhang C.; Yu W. W.; Wang X.; Zhang Y.; Xiao M. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (12), 12410–12416. 10.1021/acsnano.5b05769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makarov N. S.; Guo S.; Isaienko O.; Liu W.; Robel I.; Klimov V. I. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (4), 2349–2362. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rainò G.; Nedelcu G.; Protesescu L.; Bodnarchuk M. I.; Kovalenko M. V.; Mahrt R. F.; Stöferle T. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (2), 2485–2490. 10.1021/acsnano.5b07328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akkerman Q. A.; D’Innocenzo V.; Accornero S.; Scarpellini A.; Petrozza A.; Prato M.; Manna L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (32), 10276–10281. 10.1021/jacs.5b05602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nedelcu G.; Protesescu L.; Yakunin S.; Bodnarchuk M. I.; Grotevent M. J.; Kovalenko M. V. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (8), 5635–5640. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D.; Yang Y.; Bekenstein Y.; Yu Y.; Gibson N. A.; Wong A. B.; Eaton S. W.; Kornienko N.; Kong Q.; Lai M.; Alivisatos A. P.; Leone S. R.; Yang P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (23), 7236–7239. 10.1021/jacs.6b03134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramasamy P.; Lim D. H.; Kim B.; Lee S. H.; Lee M. S.; Lee J. S. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52 (10), 2067–2070. 10.1039/C5CC08643D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palazon F.; Akkerman Q. A.; Prato M.; Manna L. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (1), 1224–1230. 10.1021/acsnano.5b06536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D.; Eaton S. W.; Yu Y.; Dou L.; Yang P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (29), 9230–9233. 10.1021/jacs.5b05404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bekenstein Y.; Koscher B. A.; Eaton S. W.; Yang P.; Alivisatos A. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (51), 16008–16011. 10.1021/jacs.5b11199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akkerman Q. A.; Motti S. G.; Srimath Kandada A. R.; Mosconi E.; D’Innocenzo V.; Bertoni G.; Marras S.; Kamino B. A.; Miranda L.; De Angelis F.; Petrozza A.; Prato M.; Manna L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (3), 1010–1016. 10.1021/jacs.5b12124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun S.; Yuan D.; Xu Y.; Wang A.; Deng Z. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (3), 3648–3657. 10.1021/acsnano.5b08193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shamsi J.; Dang Z.; Bianchini P.; Canale C.; Stasio F. D.; Brescia R.; Prato M.; Manna L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (23), 7240–7243. 10.1021/jacs.6b03166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koolyk M.; Amgar D.; Aharon S.; Etgar L. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (12), 6403–6409. 10.1039/C5NR09127F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lignos I.; Stavrakis S.; Nedelcu G.; Protesescu L.; deMello A. J.; Kovalenko M. V. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (3), 1869–1877. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X.; Peng L.; Huang K.; Shi Z.; Xie R.; Yang W. Nano Res. 2016, 9, 1994. 10.1007/s12274-016-1090-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y.; Yassitepe E.; Voznyy O.; Comin R.; Walters G.; Gong X.; Kanjanaboos P.; Nogueira A. F.; Sargent E. H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7 (45), 25007–25013. 10.1021/acsami.5b09084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Roo J.; Ibáñez M.; Geiregat P.; Nedelcu G.; Walravens W.; Maes J.; Martins J. C.; Van Driessche I.; Kovalenko M. V.; Hens Z. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (2), 2071–2081. 10.1021/acsnano.5b06295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang H.; Chen B.; Wang Z.; Hung T. F.; Susha A. S.; Zhong H.; Rogach A. L. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 5699. 10.1039/C6SC01758D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo Y.; Shoyama K.; Sato W.; Nakamura E.. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, ( (6), ), in press. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X.; Lv L.; Ji L.; Guo G.; Liu L.; Han D.; Wang B.; Tu Y.; Hu J.; Yang D.; Dong A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (10), 3290–3293. 10.1021/jacs.6b00055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt L. C.; Pertegás A.; González-Carrero S.; Malinkiewicz O.; Agouram S.; Mínguez Espallargas G.; Bolink H. J.; Galian R. E.; Pérez-Prieto J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (3), 850–853. 10.1021/ja4109209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez-Carrero S.; Galian R. E.; Perez-Prieto J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3 (17), 9187–9193. 10.1039/C4TA05878J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Horváth E.; Spina M.; Szekrényes Z.; Kamarás K.; Gaal R.; Gachet D.; Forró L. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (12), 6761–6766. 10.1021/nl5020684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang F.; Zhong H.; Chen C.; Wu X.-g.; Hu X.; Huang H.; Han J.; Zou B.; Dong Y. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (4), 4533–4542. 10.1021/acsnano.5b01154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyagi P.; Arveson S. M.; Tisdale W. A. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6 (10), 1911–1916. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez-Carrero S.; Espallargas G. M.; Galian R. E.; Perez-Prieto J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3 (26), 14039–14045. 10.1039/C5TA01765C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jang D. M.; Park K.; Kim D. H.; Park J.; Shojaei F.; Kang H. S.; Ahn J. P.; Lee J. W.; Song J. K. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (8), 5191–5199. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang H.; Susha A. S.; Kershaw S. V.; Hung T. F.; Rogach A. L.. Adv. Sci. 2015, 2, ( (9), ), in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wong A. B.; Lai M.; Eaton S. W.; Yu Y.; Lin E.; Dou L.; Fu A.; Yang P. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (8), 5519–5524. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sichert J. A.; Tong Y.; Mutz N.; Vollmer M.; Fischer S.; Milowska K. Z.; García Cortadella R.; Nickel B.; Cardenas-Daw C.; Stolarczyk J. K.; Urban A. S.; Feldmann J. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (10), 6521–6527. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dou L.; Wong A. B.; Yu Y.; Lai M.; Kornienko N.; Eaton S. W.; Fu A.; Bischak C. G.; Ma J.; Ding T.; Ginsberg N. S.; Wang L.-W.; Alivisatos A. P.; Yang P. Science 2015, 349 (6255), 1518–1521. 10.1126/science.aac7660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hassan Y.; Song Y.; Pensack R. D.; Abdelrahman A. I.; Kobayashi Y.; Winnik M. A.; Scholes G. D. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (3), 566–573. 10.1002/adma.201503461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vybornyi O.; Yakunin S.; Kovalenko M. V. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (12), 6278–6283. 10.1039/C5NR06890H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang S.; Li Z.; Kong L.; Zhu N.; Shan A.; Li L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (18), 5749–5752. 10.1021/jacs.5b13101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aharon S.; Etgar L. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (5), 3230–3235. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hines M. A.; Guyot-Sionnest P. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100 (2), 468–471. 10.1021/jp9530562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cao Y.-W.; Banin U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38 (24), 3692–3694. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mićić O. I.; Smith B. B.; Nozik A. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104 (51), 12149–12156. 10.1021/jp0021502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Burschka J.; Pellet N.; Moon S.-J.; Humphry-Baker R.; Gao P.; Nazeeruddin M. K.; Gratzel M. Nature 2013, 499 (7458), 316–319. 10.1038/nature12340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee M. M.; Teuscher J.; Miyasaka T.; Murakami T. N.; Snaith H. J. Science 2012, 338 (6107), 643–647. 10.1126/science.1228604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Research Cell Efficiency Records. http://www.Nrel.Gov/Ncpv/Images/Efficiency_Chart.Jpg (accessed May 2016).
- Noh J. H.; Im S. H.; Heo J. H.; Mandal T. N.; Seok S. I. Nano Lett. 2013, 13 (4), 1764–1769. 10.1021/nl400349b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong Q.; Fang Y.; Shao Y.; Mulligan P.; Qiu J.; Cao L.; Huang J. Science 2015, 347 (6225), 967–970. 10.1126/science.aaa5760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi D.; Adinolfi V.; Comin R.; Yuan M.; Alarousu E.; Buin A.; Chen Y.; Hoogland S.; Rothenberger A.; Katsiev K.; Losovyj Y.; Zhang X.; Dowben P. A.; Mohammed O. F.; Sargent E. H.; Bakr O. M. Science 2015, 347 (6221), 519–522. 10.1126/science.aaa2725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhumekenov A. A.; Saidaminov M. I.; Haque M. A.; Alarousu E.; Sarmah S. P.; Murali B.; Dursun I.; Miao X.-H.; Abdelhady A. L.; Wu T.; Mohammed O. F.; Bakr O. M. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 32–37. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hao F.; Stoumpos C. C.; Chang R. P. H.; Kanatzidis M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (22), 8094–8099. 10.1021/ja5033259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manser J. S.; Christians J. A.; Kamat P. V. Chem. Rev. 2016, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walsh A.; Scanlon D. O.; Chen S.; Gong X. G.; Wei S.-H. Angew. Chem. 2015, 127 (6), 1811–1814. 10.1002/ange.201409740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quarti C.; Mosconi E.; De Angelis F. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26 (22), 6557–6569. 10.1021/cm5032046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bakulin A. A.; Selig O.; Bakker H. J.; Rezus Y. L. A.; Müller C.; Glaser T.; Lovrincic R.; Sun Z.; Chen Z.; Walsh A.; Frost J. M.; Jansen T. L. C. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6 (18), 3663–3669. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brivio F.; Frost J. M.; Skelton J. M.; Jackson A. J.; Weber O. J.; Weller M. T.; Goñi A. R.; Leguy A. M. A.; Barnes P. R. F.; Walsh A. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2015, 92 (14), 144308. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.144308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang T.-Y.; Gregori G.; Pellet N.; Grätzel M.; Maier J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (27), 7905–7910. 10.1002/anie.201500014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leguy A. M. A.; Frost J. M.; McMahon A. P.; Sakai V. G.; Kochelmann W.; Law C.; Li X.; Foglia F.; Walsh A.; O’Regan B. C.; Nelson J.; Cabral J. T.; Barnes P. R. F. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7124. 10.1038/ncomms8124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mosconi E.; De Angelis F. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 182–188. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandt R. E.; Stevanović V.; Ginley D. S.; Buonassisi T. MRS Commun. 2015, 5 (02), 265–275. 10.1557/mrc.2015.26. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zakutayev A.; Caskey C. M.; Fioretti A. N.; Ginley D. S.; Vidal J.; Stevanovic V.; Tea E.; Lany S. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5 (7), 1117–1125. 10.1021/jz5001787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berry J.; Buonassisi T.; Egger D. A.; Hodes G.; Kronik L.; Loo Y.-L.; Lubomirsky I.; Marder S. R.; Mastai Y.; Miller J. S.; Mitzi D. B.; Paz Y.; Rappe A. M.; Riess I.; Rybtchinski B.; Stafsudd O.; Stevanovic V.; Toney M. F.; Zitoun D.; Kahn A.; Ginley D.; Cahen D. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (35), 5102–5112. 10.1002/adma.201502294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganose A. M.; Butler K. T.; Walsh A.; Scanlon D. O. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4 (6), 2060–2068. 10.1039/C5TA09612J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pandey M.; Rasmussen F. A.; Kuhar K.; Olsen T.; Jacobsen K. W.; Thygesen K. S. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (4), 2234–2239. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fioretti A. N.; Schwartz C. P.; Vinson J.; Nordlund D.; Prendergast D.; Tamboli A. C.; Caskey C. M.; Tuomisto F.; Linez F.; Christensen S. T.; Toberer E. S.; Lany S.; Zakutayev A. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119 (18), 181508. 10.1063/1.4948244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi H.; Ming W.; Du M.-H. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2016, 93 (10), 104108. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.104108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zakutayev A. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4 (18), 6742–6754. 10.1039/C5TA09446A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kojima A.; Ikegami M.; Teshima K.; Miyasaka T. Chem. Lett. 2012, 41 (4), 397–399. 10.1246/cl.2012.397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Longo G.; Pertegas A.; Martinez-Sarti L.; Sessolo M.; Bolink H. J. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3 (43), 11286–11289. 10.1039/C5TC02447A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Klein J. D.; Herrick R. D.; Palmer D.; Sailor M. J.; Brumlik C. J.; Martin C. R. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5 (7), 902–904. 10.1021/cm00031a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Martin C. R. Science 1994, 266 (5193), 1961–1966. 10.1126/science.266.5193.1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y.; Xu D.; Zhang Q.; Chen D.; Huang F.; Xu Y.; Guo G.; Gu Z. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11 (12), 3433–3435. 10.1021/cm9904988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Agger J. R.; Anderson M. W.; Pemble M. E.; Terasaki O.; Nozue Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102 (18), 3345–3353. 10.1021/jp972994u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Moller K.; Bein T. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10 (10), 2950–2963. 10.1021/cm980243e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hirai T.; Okubo H.; Komasawa I. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103 (21), 4228–4230. 10.1021/jp990496a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Parala H.; Winkler H.; Kolbe M.; Wohlfart A.; Fischer R. A.; Schmechel R.; von Seggern H. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12 (14), 1050–1055. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- RoHS Evaluations. QD Television Benchmarking. http://rohs.exemptions.oeko.info/fileadmin/user_upload/RoHS_Pack_10/Cd_QD_Exs__QD_Vision_e_QD_Television_Benchmarking.pdf (accessed June 2016).
- Nanograde. Cadmium-Free Quantum Dot LCD Backlight Films for Medium- and Low-Priced LCD Displays. http://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=4168 (accessed June 2016).
- Pickett N. In Cadmium-Free Quantum Dots for Display Applications, Presented at the Display Innovation China 2015, Beijing, China, October 13, 2015.
- Lee Y.-C.; Tu S.-H.. Improving the Light-Emitting Efficiency of GaN LEDs Using Nanoimprint Lithography, Recent Advances in Nanofabrication Techniques and Applications; INTECH Open Access Publisher: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.